EPTTitanic Mini Mafia! - Page 8
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 29 2013 10:02 Vivax wrote: Cause I know I'm not scum, and cause I feel I did the right thing, albeit it ended up not accomplishing anything. Plus, I would like if people judged me on my overall play and not just that stunt. I do crazy shit as both town and scum, and while this was crazy from the point of view of my own safety, I feel that accomplishing a no lynch would have been the right thing. What exactly does a no lynch accomplish in this situation? We have a possible 1 mislynch to spare to make it an odd number of player. It might very well be we lose out on a lynch by taking a no lynch if there is a doctor or a vig. If we don't lynch papers, where does that put us at day 2? | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 29 2013 11:49 Koshi wrote: Here is the small mistake hzflank made. Here in this comment hz somewhat admits that he knows that paper is town, and he is being scared that when this flip happens, Koshi will use it to prove he is scum. This comment is full off scared scum. No fucking townie would be on the paper wagon so long and make this comment. Why would a townie suddenly doubt himself? Or suddenly be so scared to be lynched for being wrong? hzflank was also lurking during the heat of the lynch. That's another scumtell. Because nothing feels so good as scum to see the bickering of town when they are about to lynch another townie. I know the feeling from nuclear. It's 5 am and I got to go to work in 2.5 hours. Been a while since I woke up i nthe middle of the night and solved a problem. really good find | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 29 2013 23:19 Vivax wrote: And you think bad tunneling townies forget their reasons for calling someone scum like that? How is it tunneling anyway if he throws away his case to weaken his own read of PS? He could have gone like: "Joke post or not, he's still scum for the other reasons I mentioned". That would have been tunneling townie. Instead he doesn't care about his OWN REASONS. How is that even tunneling townie. Jesus christ, Oats. How do you explain he's ignoring Vayne for posting trash when saying this: Vayne made a couple of non trash posts at the time of this post. I didn't really have a problem with Vayne until he started saying that he didn't want to give scum reads. Also the one quote "posting some fluff for the sake of posting" was directed at koshi. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
I lessened my scum read on papers when he posted that his entire day of posts was a joke. The higher the chance I think he was actually joking the whole time, then, the less scummy I deem his posts. However, the next time he comes to the thread, he goes back on the fact that his entire day was a joke. He said that he was trying to get a read from me. Is trying to get a read from someone a joke? The rest of his day's posts were poor too. That is what reinforced my read on him as a scum. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 29 2013 23:51 hzflank wrote: Just to be clear here, are you saying that this is what made Paper's look less scummy to you? Personally I thought that was the scummiest thing that Paper had posted up until that point. It weakens my case against him IF he's telling the truth. So yea I guess it does make him less scummy to me at that particular time. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
Is it basically, my arguments against paper were poor? Why didn't you make this accusation on Day 1. It is because paper flipped town? 7 other people voted paper just so you know. Once paper said that he was joking I stopped using his day early Day 1 as my "case" against him. It is only after he states he was actually voting me NOT AS A JOKE but to put pressure on me. Joke vote != putting pressure on someone. Once he makes this statement, I can use his Day 1 again, as I am NOT convinced he was joking in Day 1A. How is this not logical for a townsperson. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 30 2013 03:25 Vivax wrote: If you spent more time arguing on why somebody is scum it would lend more strength to your cause rather than complaining all the time that I have a scumread on you, cause that's what you have been doing this night phase. What's your take on Vayne, Rayn, Clarity, Koshi etc etc., what are your current scumreads? complaining all the time? you asked me to explain this and that. I've made 3 posts to you explaining what I did. This is complaining? WTF. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
Koshi's find on hzflank is pretty good. I'm trying to look at it from hzflank's point of view as town and see if it's possible. It is possible in a weird sort of logic. Let's pretend hzflank is town and not that confident on paper but still more confident than anyone else. basically better than 4/13 chance of scum. He could be trying to say in case papers is town, koshi's scum vote to town paper could be an attempt to get a mislynch on him day2. So basically it comes down to how confident hzflank was that papers is town at the present time. I will re-read this and form a better opinion soon. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 30 2013 03:49 raynpelikoneet wrote: This is stupid. Being town does not mean you are right, especially if you get lynched. You're right. He's not guaranteed to be right. But you don't think a confirmed town's opinion is worthwhile? | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 30 2013 03:49 raynpelikoneet wrote: exarezee; Also if you think that's important, why don't you go over his posts and see what's in there? Vivax, can you please talk to me. I Have looked. I'm wondering why nobody fucking else has. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 30 2013 03:52 raynpelikoneet wrote: So what did you find out that is important? That's not the point. You're trying to twist my argument into something else. The point is NOBODY has looked. And this I find troubling. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 30 2013 03:59 VayneAuthority wrote: why are we looking over some one who got lynched again? You look at the filters of people that got nightkilled not lynched. Huh? | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
Night kills are also a bit tougher to look at. Was he killed because mafia thinks he's seer? Was he killed because mafia wants to kill him to get a mislynch next day? Was he killed by rand? There is a lot more variables going on . In this situation, we can look at reads from a guaranteed town. Of course his reads aren't necessarily right, but there is the fact that we know he was genuine in his reads and thoughts. | ||
| ||
