/in
I have been doing terrible, terrible things to satisfy my mafia urges.
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
/in I have been doing terrible, terrible things to satisfy my mafia urges. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
For example, let's say that Player A is going to be lynched. He knows for sure that he will die. Right before he dies, he posts a giant case against Player X. Player A flips as mafia. What does this say about Player X? Is he more likely town or mafia now? (someone else correct me if I'm off) | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 11:02 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone Well, it's hard to decide whether the "hey" part or the "everyone" part is scummier. Really a toss up. What could you possibly expect me to explain? You're taking this awfully seriously. Why did you take so long to reply if you were in the thread? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 11:17 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:13 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 11:02 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone Well, it's hard to decide whether the "hey" part or the "everyone" part is scummier. Really a toss up. What could you possibly expect me to explain? You're taking this awfully seriously. Why did you take so long to reply if you were in the thread? Not taking it super seriously, just busting you back. I posted in the thread then went back to reddit. Checked the thread again after a few minutes. I'll be around tonight and early tomorrow morning. And hey Xzavier. Hmm. In both other newbie games, you started out with a policy post about lurkers. Any particular reason why you changed for this game? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 11:20 Xzavier wrote: yup, im watching fullmetal alchemist then between episodes or every 5-10 min refreshing this. Okay i lie, i have 2 windows open and im spamming F5 on this page. Right now conversation is just picking up. Its smalltalk lol, then somebody is like: HEY FUCK YOU ##VOTE then shit gets real Why did you feel the need to say what you're doing right now? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 11:38 Xzavier wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:36 Chromatically wrote: Alright, I see. What do you think of Xzavier so far? hes the sexiest motherfucker alive. obviously. also town. Of course, he's the second sexiest. What do you think about our other friend Spicy? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 11:43 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:25 Chromatically wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 24 2013 11:17 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:13 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 11:02 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone Well, it's hard to decide whether the "hey" part or the "everyone" part is scummier. Really a toss up. What could you possibly expect me to explain? You're taking this awfully seriously. Why did you take so long to reply if you were in the thread? Not taking it super seriously, just busting you back. I posted in the thread then went back to reddit. Checked the thread again after a few minutes. I'll be around tonight and early tomorrow morning. And hey Xzavier. Hmm. In both other newbie games, you started out with a policy post about lurkers. Any particular reason why you changed for this game? I noticed that too. This is Spicy's first post in his previous game, where he was town: Show nested quote + On June 06 2013 10:47 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone, I'll get the ball rolling. One of the most important things I've learned about day 1 is to make sure that town is active and posting USEFUL information and not just fluff. Lurkers do nothing to help town and are scummy. As such, I will and I encourage others, to pressure lurkers to post. That is quite a lot more content than his first post in this thread: You don't buy his explanation? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
HS, if a nosy neighbor claims, then scum can either nk them (and thus waste the tracker's action), or treat it as a VT claim and have a reduced pool of possible blues to snipe. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
HS, who's scum? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 12:10 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Alright, it appears that my plan has oversights that are unacceptable risks at this juncture. Thank you to the veteran players (or just simply better players) who found them so quickly. Personally, I'm more concerned about Chromatic's point (regarding letting mafia call their shot on blues) than the risk of a mafia-tracker claiming NN, but I will not protest if we continue the scum-hunt without regard for my posted plan. To me, everyone who is posting one-liners looks spammy to me, but I think the 'everyone is scum until they convince me otherwise' mentality isn't the worst thing in the world. Spicy and Xzavier are on my radar for the fluff and nonsense at the beginning. Chromatically and FirmTofu seem the most town as they were very quick to point out what were (in their view) flaws in a plan to move forward that may have compromised the town. What sort of "fluff and nonsense" do you see from them? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 13:12 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Chromatically, do you have any scumreads? Right now, I'm looking at Xzavier and hzflank. Both have posted a bit, but neither have been scumhunting. hz's recent post makes me feel a little better, but it did only come when I specifically asked him and I don't really agree with it. That doesn't necessarily make him scum though. There are also some other small things that bother me, but I'll elaborate on those later. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 13:28 Aquanim wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 12:30 FirmTofu wrote: Quoted Player List for reference: On June 18 2013 14:22 geript wrote: The Players
We still have yet to hear from Onegu, fyfy, Alakaslam, and LoneMeow. You wound me. Regarding claims I'm of the opinion that the Nosy Neighbour/Alpha 5 should claim now. This role is similar to a Miller in that it isn't useful for town at all, and could seriously backfire if they are watched/tracked/whatever by a townie. I don't see any downside to a Nosy Neighbour claiming, the worst case is that they play obvtown, get shot, and draw a shot away from actual town power roles. The biggest reason a Nosy Neighbour should claim now is that it eliminates the possibility of a scum fake-claiming it later if he is caught shooting/using a PR on someone. If we establish that a Nosy Neighbour should claim now, anyone claiming it later is caught scum. Obviously, scum can claim Nosy Neighbour so whoever claims it isn't confirmed town by any means. No other power roles should claim, that would be daft. (However, scum should feel free to claim their roles.) Regarding scum Current scumread is Chromatically for two reasons. 1) I don't like the feel of his initial posts. Making troll-cases to get the game rolling is fine, I have no objection to that in as of itself, but there's a certain nit-picking quality to his posts that feels wrong to me. Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:13 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 11:02 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone Well, it's hard to decide whether the "hey" part or the "everyone" part is scummier. Really a toss up. What could you possibly expect me to explain? You're taking this awfully seriously. Why did you take so long to reply if you were in the thread? Trying to read something into someone not posting for five minutes is ludicrous. 2) He's been doing a lot of asking other people for their reads while offering nothing even approaching one of his own. ##Vote: Chromatically Aqua, are you scum? Both of these things are towntells. Explain to me the scum motivation in getting discussion rolling early day 1, which was OBVIOUSLY the reason that I pressured Spicy (and it worked). Sorry, if you thought that it was "ludicrous", but it doesn't make me scum and you know it. If you wanted to know about someone, you could just asked me. I'm not just going to randomly post reads if I'm not going to push for their lynch, but I'll definitely tell you what I think of someone or who my scumreads are. Why wouldn't you ask me for my scumreads if you wanted them? Probably because that's not actually what you want at all. Someone else asked me for scumreads, and I posted mine right below your post, but you haven't reacted to that at all. Does this point still stand even after I've posted my scumreads? Or did your opinion not change at all for some reason? You also said: On June 24 2013 17:04 Aquanim wrote: This doesn't feel to me like the town Chromatic which I played with in Newbie XXXIII. Oh, this feels more like the scum Chromatic from XXXI? I am very, very uncomfortable with you, Aqua, because you are usually very town from your first post. This game, you've done a lot of shitting up the thread with stuff about claims and NNs. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 21:08 Aquanim wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 20:43 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 13:28 Aquanim wrote: On June 24 2013 12:30 FirmTofu wrote: Quoted Player List for reference: On June 18 2013 14:22 geript wrote: The Players
We still have yet to hear from Onegu, fyfy, Alakaslam, and LoneMeow. You wound me. Regarding claims I'm of the opinion that the Nosy Neighbour/Alpha 5 should claim now. This role is similar to a Miller in that it isn't useful for town at all, and could seriously backfire if they are watched/tracked/whatever by a townie. I don't see any downside to a Nosy Neighbour claiming, the worst case is that they play obvtown, get shot, and draw a shot away from actual town power roles. The biggest reason a Nosy Neighbour should claim now is that it eliminates the possibility of a scum fake-claiming it later if he is caught shooting/using a PR on someone. If we establish that a Nosy Neighbour should claim now, anyone claiming it later is caught scum. Obviously, scum can claim Nosy Neighbour so whoever claims it isn't confirmed town by any means. No other power roles should claim, that would be daft. (However, scum should feel free to claim their roles.) Regarding scum Current scumread is Chromatically for two reasons. 1) I don't like the feel of his initial posts. Making troll-cases to get the game rolling is fine, I have no objection to that in as of itself, but there's a certain nit-picking quality to his posts that feels wrong to me. On June 24 2013 11:13 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 11:02 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone Well, it's hard to decide whether the "hey" part or the "everyone" part is scummier. Really a toss up. What could you possibly expect me to explain? You're taking this awfully seriously. Why did you take so long to reply if you were in the thread? Trying to read something into someone not posting for five minutes is ludicrous. 2) He's been doing a lot of asking other people for their reads while offering nothing even approaching one of his own. ##Vote: Chromatically Aqua, are you scum? Both of these things are towntells. Explain to me the scum motivation in getting discussion rolling early day 1, which was OBVIOUSLY the reason that I pressured Spicy (and it worked). Sorry, if you thought that it was "ludicrous", but it doesn't make me scum and you know it. Oh, I don't have a problem with you starting the discussion - but the way in which you chose to do it made me feel uneasy. Calling somebody out for leaving for five minutes? Really? A very slight gut read was really all that ever boiled down to. Show nested quote + If you wanted to know about someone, you could just asked me. I'm not just going to randomly post reads if I'm not going to push for their lynch, but I'll definitely tell you what I think of someone or who my scumreads are. Why wouldn't you ask me for my scumreads if you wanted them? Probably because that's not actually what you want at all. Someone else asked me for scumreads, and I posted mine right below your post, but you haven't reacted to that at all. Does this point still stand even after I've posted my scumreads? Or did your opinion not change at all for some reason? Those reads were pretty weak, I'd like to see more from you. Show nested quote + You also said: On June 24 2013 17:04 Aquanim wrote: This doesn't feel to me like the town Chromatic which I played with in Newbie XXXIII. Oh, this feels more like the scum Chromatic from XXXI? No, it didn't feel like either of them, but I don't expect your scumgame to be the same as XXXI - you have learned a lot since then, I think. Show nested quote + I am very, very uncomfortable with you, Aqua, because you are usually very town from your first post. This game, you've done a lot of shitting up the thread with stuff about claims and NNs. I kept getting asked about and called scum over the NN stuff, I would really have preferred for that not to drag out the way it did. tl;dr I had uneasy feelings about you but I feel a lot better after reading this post. My vote was fundamentally to draw reactions from you (to clarify my read) and other people, and to start some meaningful discussion (I don't think anything is accomplished in a thread until somebody's thrown down a vote). Go find some scum. ##Unvote I did a reread, and I can see where you're coming from on most of these things. I still don't see how the Spicy thing is scummy, but it's not a big deal if it's just a "slight gut read". I'm feeling better about Xzav now. He's basically been saying useless stuff, but it reads like a very "hyper" townie who's just saying everything who's just saying whatever comes to mind. He did say that he'd be changing up his posting style. That wouldn't be that hard to fake as scum however, so I'm counting on future contributions from him. That all pretty much goes for Alakaslam too. I need to see some real stuff from both. Stay tuned for more live scumhunting action, after this commercial break. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- hz is trying hard to appear as a contributer, without actually contributing. On June 24 2013 11:43 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:25 Chromatically wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 24 2013 11:17 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:13 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 11:02 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone Well, it's hard to decide whether the "hey" part or the "everyone" part is scummier. Really a toss up. What could you possibly expect me to explain? You're taking this awfully seriously. Why did you take so long to reply if you were in the thread? Not taking it super seriously, just busting you back. I posted in the thread then went back to reddit. Checked the thread again after a few minutes. I'll be around tonight and early tomorrow morning. And hey Xzavier. Hmm. In both other newbie games, you started out with a policy post about lurkers. Any particular reason why you changed for this game? I noticed that too. This is Spicy's first post in his previous game, where he was town: Show nested quote + On June 06 2013 10:47 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone, I'll get the ball rolling. One of the most important things I've learned about day 1 is to make sure that town is active and posting USEFUL information and not just fluff. Lurkers do nothing to help town and are scummy. As such, I will and I encourage others, to pressure lurkers to post. That is quite a lot more content than his first post in this thread: This is his first post in the thread. While it might not seem like a big deal, I don't like that he doesn't have a casual opening post. He was present at the beginning of the game, so why wouldn't he post something like everyone else did? It indicates that he is uncomfortable in the thread. To avoid being seen as a lurker, hz siezes on the first thing that he can: he basically repeats what I said about Spicy. He's posting just for the sake of posting, because this post is purely a restatement of what has already been said. He does this again later, in the NN/claim clusterfuck, even though I had already said all of this: On June 24 2013 12:24 hzflank wrote: Another reason why I do not think NN should claim is that the scum ideally want to kill good town roles and the last townie they want to kill is the NN. While the NN does not claim they may be targeted for a night kill, and I would much prefer NN to be night killed that for a tracker etc to be night killed. On June 24 2013 12:01 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:55 Chromatically wrote: Or a framer/scum tracker not carrying the hit can claim NN if they see that no one else has done so, and become "confirmed town". HS, who's scum? That would be a risky claim though, as if we do end up lynching town I would rather lynch NN than any other town member. This is also why I do not think that NN should claim though. What's the point of this post? Seriously, look at this from a town perspective and find the point that this post makes. It literally says nothing. He posts stuff that has already been said because he's trying hard to look for any way to post without actually contributing. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Also note the subtle playing of the "noob card" here: On June 24 2013 12:18 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:53 Spicydinosaur wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 24 2013 11:43 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:25 Chromatically wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 24 2013 11:17 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:13 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 11:02 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone Well, it's hard to decide whether the "hey" part or the "everyone" part is scummier. Really a toss up. What could you possibly expect me to explain? You're taking this awfully seriously. Why did you take so long to reply if you were in the thread? Not taking it super seriously, just busting you back. I posted in the thread then went back to reddit. Checked the thread again after a few minutes. I'll be around tonight and early tomorrow morning. And hey Xzavier. Hmm. In both other newbie games, you started out with a policy post about lurkers. Any particular reason why you changed for this game? I noticed that too. This is Spicy's first post in his previous game, where he was town: Show nested quote + On June 06 2013 10:47 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone, I'll get the ball rolling. One of the most important things I've learned about day 1 is to make sure that town is active and posting USEFUL information and not just fluff. Lurkers do nothing to help town and are scummy. As such, I will and I encourage others, to pressure lurkers to post. That is quite a lot more content than his first post in this thread: Sheeping off of others opinions already? Also heres the QT chat i was referring too. Though i dont know how to post to a specific QT box Heres the QT: http://www.quicktopic.com/50/H/YXgCU77iVMsa and its posts: 11, 16, 21. Spicydinosaur http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18810769 + Show Spoiler + Fluffity fluff fluff fluff, I will, Fluffity fluff. vote spicy as not the towniest MOFU in thread. umasi xzav and yvanna are town random guy that thinks hes better than he is and fferyl are probably town but not that much i'd lynch firere and spicy for now not sure about the third spicy should be killed with fire Furthermore you should look back at my other 2 games if you want to see what my openings were. They too were different. Fair enough. To be honest I am surprised that you got those negative comments for your first post in that thread, but then what do I know? I do not think that talk of sheeping (I had already started my post when he posted his) on day one is useful, but I do believe you as to why your first post was just the two words. "Oh, remember that I'm just a noob, so don't mind me if I don't try to find scum at all." Not inconceivable from town, but more likely from scum. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posting without really saying anything = scum ##Vote: hzflank | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
His opinion about meta is really wierd, but I think it's town-based. Would scum be willing to stand out and draw so much attention to themselves for no reason by espousing an unpopular opinion? I don't think so. I don't like how conciliatory he is about his read on you ("I am not saying you are definitely scum or anything like that."), that feels like he's trying not to cause waves. In general though, he seems comfortable in-thread and he's freely posting. Also, On June 24 2013 12:36 FirmTofu wrote: I actually do believe Spicydinosaur is scummy, but not for the reasons that Hurricane Sponge states. In all of his posts, he is extremely defensive. At the slightest mention of someone accusing him of anything, he flares up in his own defense. This could be due to his personality or it could be that he is extremely afraid of getting lynched. If it is indeed the latter, he is likely to be a powerful role, town or mafia. This is my preliminary assessment. (It's funny that this real analysis is in agreement with my fluff analysis at the beginning of the game) I think the first sentence shows a clear town urge to find scum. As scum, it would be easy to sheep Sponge's read on you. He feels that it's necessary to clarify his personal reasoning, though, which means that he's honestly thinking about who is scum. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 25 2013 01:57 Onegu wrote: Town at this point he doesnt have many posts but what he does post are scum hunts and his view on the NN idea, not much fluff amd not any sheeping. What do you mean "not much fluff and not any sheeping"? That's pretty much the whole case. He's posted things that I've already said (sheeping) and he's posting things that say nothing (fluff). It's totally scum-motivated. The NN thing is not alignment-based, which is why I'd prefer if we stopped talking about it. It's very easy for scum to comment on, but it's possible for town to comment as well, so you can't determine anything. On June 25 2013 02:08 Spicydinosaur wrote: Just got done reading it. I completely agree on your first point as I had a similar feeling. The one thing I've been liking out of him was his conversation with tofu. He really seems to be trying to push tofu and actually getting a good reaction out of him. Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 13:52 hzflank wrote: On June 24 2013 13:34 FirmTofu wrote: On June 24 2013 13:22 hzflank wrote: On June 24 2013 13:00 Chromatically wrote: hz, do you have any scumreads? At the moment I am looking at FirmTofu. His chain of attack and defense looks like: Attack Chromatically Attack Xzavier Attack Hurricane Attack Spicy Defend Hurricane Defend Xzavier Attack Spicy For some reason the defenses seem a little out of place to me, especially the defense on Xzavier. On the other hand I believe Hurricane to be town as if he were scum then he is very brave to make the first post that he did. I am also very aware that I made an slightly extended attack on Spicy, who now seems to be FirmTofu's main target. I am wondering if he thinks Spicy is a good lynch target because he can count on my vote.(1) He has also said twice that we should only use information from this game and not previous games. I think town should have access to as much information as possible in order to lynch scum. Therefore to me, FirmTofu is currently the scummiest player.(2) You are taking an extremely simplified approach to analyze my actions. I am not "attacking" or "defending" anyone. I am stating my opinions on how various people are behaving. If you can't distinguish between the two, we have a serious problem here. You can't say that my "defenses" are out of place without even looking at the context of the situation. Read my quote, see if it makes sense to you, and form an opinion based on that. Furthermore, this post is as scummy as scummy gets. You state that you can side with me as I pursue a lynch on Spicy(see 1), but you also consider me to be the scummiest player(see 2). How are these two chain of thoughts compatible? Maybe you prefer the term Poking to Attacking, it makes no difference to me as I am an RTS player by nature and so I attack for information. I read your filter several times, so it is not a case of me being lazy with my reading. I did not say that you can count on my vote on Spicy. I will rephrase what I said to make it less ambiguous: I am wondering if Firm thinks that he can count on my vote on Spicy, and therefore thinks that Spicy is a good lynch target. Got a null read atm. Fair enough, but I'm not convinced by his attack on Tofu. It came only after I specifically asked him, and he doesn't push it at all. He's not even convinced enough to vote him. In addition, look at this post: On June 24 2013 12:07 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 12:01 FirmTofu wrote: As an aside, I would prefer if the accusations remained within the confines of this game and this game only. That is to say, judging people on the differences between their past games and this one is a rather boring way to play the game. But on day one, is that not all we have to go off of? Just a few posts later, hz says that Tofu is his scumread. But does this post sound like hz is talking to his scumread? It's phrased in a non-confrontational manner. It sounds like he's talking to someone he thinks is town, even though he's claiming that it's his scumread. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 25 2013 02:12 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 01:23 Chromatically wrote: I've been feeling Tofu as town. His opinion about meta is really wierd, but I think it's town-based. Would scum be willing to stand out and draw so much attention to themselves for no reason by espousing an unpopular opinion? I don't think so. I don't like how conciliatory he is about his read on you ("I am not saying you are definitely scum or anything like that."), that feels like he's trying not to cause waves. In general though, he seems comfortable in-thread and he's freely posting. Also, On June 24 2013 12:36 FirmTofu wrote: I actually do believe Spicydinosaur is scummy, but not for the reasons that Hurricane Sponge states. In all of his posts, he is extremely defensive. At the slightest mention of someone accusing him of anything, he flares up in his own defense. This could be due to his personality or it could be that he is extremely afraid of getting lynched. If it is indeed the latter, he is likely to be a powerful role, town or mafia. This is my preliminary assessment. (It's funny that this real analysis is in agreement with my fluff analysis at the beginning of the game) I think the first sentence shows a clear town urge to find scum. As scum, it would be easy to sheep Sponge's read on you. He feels that it's necessary to clarify his personal reasoning, though, which means that he's honestly thinking about who is scum. The bolded part what bothers me. Trying not to make waves is a perfect way to go unnoticed in a game. Too much activity and everyones looking at you, too little and your a lurker who gets a big spotlight on you. Yeah, that's the part that I agree with you on; it's what bothers me most about him so far. I think that overall the townie stuff outweighs it (for now, at least). | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
Now explain to me why this master scum plot is more likely than us both being town. Example: He closed by saying that if Chrom starts to play a good town game then he will move his vote to someone else, which in this case will be the person that Chrom votes for because they are scumbuddies. Or maybe his read actually will change if I start playing like town? You have absolutely no reason to believe that (unless you don't actually believe it). Why are you so confident that both of us are scum, if you haven't actually pointed out anything scummy that we've did? It makes no sense. I don't like your strawman on my case. You've chosen the weakest part to point out (no casual opening), but ignored the rest. It's most definitely not a flimsy case, especially compared to what you have here. Maybe you should go through it and answer my specific points. Why did you feel the need to repeat things that I had said? Most importantly, why are you so confident in calling Tofu town when he was YOUR SCUMREAD THAT YOU PRESSURED.+ Show Spoiler + On June 24 2013 13:22 hzflank wrote: At the moment I am looking at FirmTofu. His chain of attack and defense looks like: Attack Chromatically Attack Xzavier Attack Hurricane Attack Spicy Defend Hurricane Defend Xzavier Attack Spicy For some reason the defenses seem a little out of place to me, especially the defense on Xzavier. On the other hand I believe Hurricane to be town as if he were scum then he is very brave to make the first post that he did. I am also very aware that I made an slightly extended attack on Spicy, who now seems to be FirmTofu's main target. I am wondering if he thinks Spicy is a good lynch target because he can count on my vote. He has also said twice that we should only use information from this game and not previous games. I think town should have access to as much information as possible in order to lynch scum. Therefore to me, FirmTofu is currently the scummiest player. I am very comfortable with where my vote is. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 25 2013 02:46 Onegu wrote: About Hz he doesnt post alot of fluff unless you want to count the NN posts, I also just filtered him when you asked and saw him make scum reads. Some of it maybe sheeping but I dont think scum would do that to much, at least he is creating scum reads with some thought behind them. I see newbie town who isnt confident in his reads. Really? Here's some fluff: + Show Spoiler + On June 24 2013 11:48 hzflank wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 24 2013 11:47 Chromatically wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:43 hzflank wrote: On June 24 2013 11:25 Chromatically wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 24 2013 11:17 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:13 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 11:02 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone Well, it's hard to decide whether the "hey" part or the "everyone" part is scummier. Really a toss up. What could you possibly expect me to explain? You're taking this awfully seriously. Why did you take so long to reply if you were in the thread? Not taking it super seriously, just busting you back. I posted in the thread then went back to reddit. Checked the thread again after a few minutes. I'll be around tonight and early tomorrow morning. And hey Xzavier. Hmm. In both other newbie games, you started out with a policy post about lurkers. Any particular reason why you changed for this game? I noticed that too. This is Spicy's first post in his previous game, where he was town: On June 06 2013 10:47 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone, I'll get the ball rolling. One of the most important things I've learned about day 1 is to make sure that town is active and posting USEFUL information and not just fluff. Lurkers do nothing to help town and are scummy. As such, I will and I encourage others, to pressure lurkers to post. That is quite a lot more content than his first post in this thread: On June 24 2013 11:02 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone You don't buy his explanation? I am reading through the obs for that game now. I am very new to Mafia and used the recent Roulette game as my introduction to forum mafia, so I did not follow the previous newbie games. I will post again when I have spent more time reading that obs. On June 24 2013 11:49 hzflank wrote: Grr I need to preview before I post, messed that quote up. I am so used to being able to edit ![]() On June 24 2013 12:01 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:55 Chromatically wrote: Or a framer/scum tracker not carrying the hit can claim NN if they see that no one else has done so, and become "confirmed town". HS, who's scum? That would be a risky claim though, as if we do end up lynching town I would rather lynch NN than any other town member. This is also why I do not think that NN should claim though. On June 24 2013 11:43 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:25 Chromatically wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 24 2013 11:17 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:13 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 11:02 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone Well, it's hard to decide whether the "hey" part or the "everyone" part is scummier. Really a toss up. What could you possibly expect me to explain? You're taking this awfully seriously. Why did you take so long to reply if you were in the thread? Not taking it super seriously, just busting you back. I posted in the thread then went back to reddit. Checked the thread again after a few minutes. I'll be around tonight and early tomorrow morning. And hey Xzavier. Hmm. In both other newbie games, you started out with a policy post about lurkers. Any particular reason why you changed for this game? I noticed that too. This is Spicy's first post in his previous game, where he was town: Show nested quote + On June 06 2013 10:47 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone, I'll get the ball rolling. One of the most important things I've learned about day 1 is to make sure that town is active and posting USEFUL information and not just fluff. Lurkers do nothing to help town and are scummy. As such, I will and I encourage others, to pressure lurkers to post. That is quite a lot more content than his first post in this thread: On June 24 2013 12:18 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:53 Spicydinosaur wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 24 2013 11:43 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:25 Chromatically wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 24 2013 11:17 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 11:13 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 11:02 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone Well, it's hard to decide whether the "hey" part or the "everyone" part is scummier. Really a toss up. What could you possibly expect me to explain? You're taking this awfully seriously. Why did you take so long to reply if you were in the thread? Not taking it super seriously, just busting you back. I posted in the thread then went back to reddit. Checked the thread again after a few minutes. I'll be around tonight and early tomorrow morning. And hey Xzavier. Hmm. In both other newbie games, you started out with a policy post about lurkers. Any particular reason why you changed for this game? I noticed that too. This is Spicy's first post in his previous game, where he was town: Show nested quote + On June 06 2013 10:47 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey everyone, I'll get the ball rolling. One of the most important things I've learned about day 1 is to make sure that town is active and posting USEFUL information and not just fluff. Lurkers do nothing to help town and are scummy. As such, I will and I encourage others, to pressure lurkers to post. That is quite a lot more content than his first post in this thread: Sheeping off of others opinions already? Also heres the QT chat i was referring too. Though i dont know how to post to a specific QT box Heres the QT: http://www.quicktopic.com/50/H/YXgCU77iVMsa and its posts: 11, 16, 21. Spicydinosaur http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18810769 + Show Spoiler + Fluffity fluff fluff fluff, I will, Fluffity fluff. vote spicy as not the towniest MOFU in thread. umasi xzav and yvanna are town random guy that thinks hes better than he is and fferyl are probably town but not that much i'd lynch firere and spicy for now not sure about the third spicy should be killed with fire Furthermore you should look back at my other 2 games if you want to see what my openings were. They too were different. Fair enough. To be honest I am surprised that you got those negative comments for your first post in that thread, but then what do I know? I do not think that talk of sheeping (I had already started my post when he posted his) on day one is useful, but I do believe you as to why your first post was just the two words. On June 24 2013 12:24 hzflank wrote: Another reason why I do not think NN should claim is that the scum ideally want to kill good town roles and the last townie they want to kill is the NN. While the NN does not claim they may be targeted for a night kill, and I would much prefer NN to be night killed that for a tracker etc to be night killed. All of these posts are either repeating me or just plain useless. They make up over half of his posting. Do you still think that he's unconfident noob town after his conspiracy theory? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 25 2013 04:06 FirmTofu wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 03:41 Chromatically wrote: What's really bizarre is how quickly Tofu agreed with this case. You'd better explain yourself too. I agreed with it in the sense that it was a plausible theory, not that it was particularly likely. For the record I have you both pegged as town and I think you are both wasting precious time accusing one another. His conspiracy idea arose mainly because you accused him of being scum. I see his post as a long-winded retaliation against your credibility to ensure that no one bandwagons him to oblivion. Why do you think that he is town? Did you read my case? Where's the town motivation in making up a story purely to hurt my credibility? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
I assume that you're busy right now answering my other questions about your case, so in addition: On June 25 2013 04:17 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 04:06 FirmTofu wrote: On June 25 2013 03:41 Chromatically wrote: What's really bizarre is how quickly Tofu agreed with this case. You'd better explain yourself too. I agreed with it in the sense that it was a plausible theory, not that it was particularly likely. For the record I have you both pegged as town and I think you are both wasting precious time accusing one another. His conspiracy idea arose mainly because you accused him of being scum. I see his post as a long-winded retaliation against your credibility to ensure that no one bandwagons him to oblivion. While I may obviously be incorrect, it was not retaliation. Before Chrom voted for me I had already decided that if Aqua moves his vote off of Chrom and then Chrom makes a case against me then they are working together. When did you decide this? Right when you saw Aqua's case on me? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 25 2013 05:06 hzflank wrote: I started out by coming to the conclusion that you were either both town or both scum. Aqua's first post looked like a weak poke on a Chrom that he perceived to be town. It was like he had already decided that you were of the same alignment as he was, so I thought he either had a town read that he was trying to confirm, or he knew that you were scum. I already thought that the first part of Aqua's post was a bit scummy, so I hoped to see some interaction between you and him. Why would Aqua make a case on me and put down the first vote if he thought that I was town? Or at least, why don't you think that he thought I was scum? It was weak, yes, but he pursued it for a bit and asked others what they thought of it. Now, at this point what do you think Aqua's reply should be? Your scum read post did not really contain anything substantial and in fact I would say that I was in fact scum hunting (I had poked several people). I thought to myself: If Aqua takes his vote off of Chrom before asking Chrom for more info on his reads, then it is because Aqua does not need to know Chrom's reads. Aqua even says this himself in his next post: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 21:08 Aquanim wrote: Those reads were pretty weak, I'd like to see more from you. And then in that same post he says: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 21:08 Aquanim wrote: tl;dr I had uneasy feelings about you but I feel a lot better after reading this post So Aqua does not get what he wants from you, but for some reason feels better about you, which is why I do not think that you are both town. If you were both town then that exchange should not of ended so easily. This is a fair point, but I'm not sure how it applies to me instead of just Aqua. Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 04:27 Chromatically wrote: Your explanation's fair. It still doesn't excuse the large amount of fluff and general bad feel I get from your early posting (not that's really explainable). I assume that you're busy right now answering my other questions about your case, so in addition: On June 25 2013 04:17 hzflank wrote: On June 25 2013 04:06 FirmTofu wrote: On June 25 2013 03:41 Chromatically wrote: What's really bizarre is how quickly Tofu agreed with this case. You'd better explain yourself too. I agreed with it in the sense that it was a plausible theory, not that it was particularly likely. For the record I have you both pegged as town and I think you are both wasting precious time accusing one another. His conspiracy idea arose mainly because you accused him of being scum. I see his post as a long-winded retaliation against your credibility to ensure that no one bandwagons him to oblivion. While I may obviously be incorrect, it was not retaliation. Before Chrom voted for me I had already decided that if Aqua moves his vote off of Chrom and then Chrom makes a case against me then they are working together. When did you decide this? Right when you saw Aqua's case on me? Right when Aqua said he felt better about you (above). I read that at the same time as I read your previous post. The exchange just did not go as I would expect it to between two town members. When did your read on Tofu change from scum to strong town? Is your town read on him totally dependent on associations between me and Aqua? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 12:07 hzflank wrote: Can I change my TL post timestamps to EST, so they match with the ones from previous QTs? If so, how? Why do you want your timestamps to match QTs? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
His theory is really quite ridiculous, and I had a hard time thinking that he actually believed in his case. This post is so, so town, though: On June 25 2013 05:06 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 03:41 Chromatically wrote: lol 10/10 conspiracy theory of the century Now explain to me why this master scum plot is more likely than us both being town. It is a conspiracy theory, which we both know means that I have a lot riding on it as I stand to look like a fool if it all goes wrong. I started out by coming to the conclusion that you were either both town or both scum. Aqua's first post looked like a weak poke on a Chrom that he perceived to be town. It was like he had already decided that you were of the same alignment as he was, so I thought he either had a town read that he was trying to confirm, or he knew that you were scum. I already thought that the first part of Aqua's post was a bit scummy, so I hoped to see some interaction between you and him. Your first post in response contained this: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 20:43 Chromatically wrote: If you wanted to know about someone, you could just asked me. I'm not just going to randomly post reads if I'm not going to push for their lynch, but I'll definitely tell you what I think of someone or who my scumreads are. Why wouldn't you ask me for my scumreads if you wanted them? Probably because that's not actually what you want at all. Someone else asked me for scumreads, and I posted mine right below your post, but you haven't reacted to that at all. Does this point still stand even after I've posted my scumreads? Or did your opinion not change at all for some reason? In the above quote you referred to your previous post here: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 13:29 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 13:12 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Chromatically, do you have any scumreads? Right now, I'm looking at Xzavier and hzflank. Both have posted a bit, but neither have been scumhunting. hz's recent post makes me feel a little better, but it did only come when I specifically asked him and I don't really agree with it. That doesn't necessarily make him scum though. There are also some other small things that bother me, but I'll elaborate on those later. Now, at this point what do you think Aqua's reply should be? Your scum read post did not really contain anything substantial and in fact I would say that I was in fact scum hunting (I had poked several people). I thought to myself: If Aqua takes his vote off of Chrom before asking Chrom for more info on his reads, then it is because Aqua does not need to know Chrom's reads. Aqua even says this himself in his next post: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 21:08 Aquanim wrote: Those reads were pretty weak, I'd like to see more from you. And then in that same post he says: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 21:08 Aquanim wrote: tl;dr I had uneasy feelings about you but I feel a lot better after reading this post So Aqua does not get what he wants from you, but for some reason feels better about you, which is why I do not think that you are both town. If you were both town then that exchange should not of ended so easily. Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 04:27 Chromatically wrote: Your explanation's fair. It still doesn't excuse the large amount of fluff and general bad feel I get from your early posting (not that's really explainable). I assume that you're busy right now answering my other questions about your case, so in addition: On June 25 2013 04:17 hzflank wrote: On June 25 2013 04:06 FirmTofu wrote: On June 25 2013 03:41 Chromatically wrote: What's really bizarre is how quickly Tofu agreed with this case. You'd better explain yourself too. I agreed with it in the sense that it was a plausible theory, not that it was particularly likely. For the record I have you both pegged as town and I think you are both wasting precious time accusing one another. His conspiracy idea arose mainly because you accused him of being scum. I see his post as a long-winded retaliation against your credibility to ensure that no one bandwagons him to oblivion. While I may obviously be incorrect, it was not retaliation. Before Chrom voted for me I had already decided that if Aqua moves his vote off of Chrom and then Chrom makes a case against me then they are working together. When did you decide this? Right when you saw Aqua's case on me? Right when Aqua said he felt better about you (above). I read that at the same time as I read your previous post. The exchange just did not go as I would expect it to between two town members. The logic is convoluted and wrong, but I have a hard time believing that scum hz made it all up. A scum hz would have to: 1) come up with this theory (even though they're not scumhunting) 2) explain his reasoning in a clear way that "makes sense" from a town perspective I can't see a way that scum hz develops this reasoning, so clearly from a town perspective, while actually being scum. His next post: On June 25 2013 05:37 hzflank wrote: Aqua asked Tofu twice for his opinions on you. This means that if I assume that you and Aqua are scum, then Tofu must be town. There is no way that one scum would insist on an opinion of another scum from the third scum. Also, I would think that Aqua and Toku are not scumbuddies, since Tofu's opinion on you seemed important to Aqua. My take on the reason for that was to establish that Tofu thinks you (Chrom) town. Since Tofu is one of the more active posters so far, if he thinks you town he would be easier to get on my wagon and may even make some good posts to convince others. So as you suggested, my strong town read on Tofu is dependent on my scum read on you and Aqua. This is some of the most convoluted association logic I've ever heard (coming from me). Once again, I can't see scum coming up with this reasoning just in order to justify their read change. A scum hz could have just said that "it was the only way my theory worked" or something and been fine, but this logic is done from a town perspective, I think. ##Unvote However, I encourage you to look through XXXIII if you have the time (my profile). I tunneled two townies all game long and lead a voteswitch off of the GF because I was convinced that they were scum together. Not so much based on their individual actions, but more on the preflip associations I thought that I saw. The lesson I learned was that preflip association cases are really, really, bad. Your case is 100% preflip associations, but they never work out. I would be very interested in hearing a case on Aqua based on his actions alone, if you really think that he's scum. If Aqua flips red, then that's a good time to go look for his associations to others. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
I'm looking more towards the Xzav/Alaka/Stim/Meow semi-/lurker area. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
Also: this giant shitfight between the two of you is really town from both sides. It draws a very large amount of attention to yourselves, definitely not something that scum wants to do. I'm far more interested in the people who disappear when they're not the focus of attention, aka not the four main contributors of today. I think that Xzavier is actually the one I want to lynch today. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 25 2013 08:59 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 05:54 Chromatically wrote: Okay, last question: On June 24 2013 12:07 hzflank wrote: Can I change my TL post timestamps to EST, so they match with the ones from previous QTs? If so, how? Why do you want your timestamps to match QTs? Why did you ask the above question to me? I was just wondering if you really wanted your timestamps to match the scum QTs, since I couldn't think of any other reason why you'd want to match QT times with thread times. Just fishing, really, didn't expect to get anything. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 12:35 Xzavier wrote: Fuck me, i just typed somethign really nice all out and accidentally switched windows. Take two: First actual post of this game: This is my first game involving tracker/watcher/ect. Okay, from what iv learned so far is that town has some borderline useless roles (tracker watcher) The opprotunities where they would be beneficial are so rare that its hardly useful, and with the exisance of a NN it could all be BS. So there really is barely any information to gain, and if you do get any of this slightly more than useless info, its unreliable. But, the flipside. We have Parity cop who can effectively check two people every night. He shouldnt claim. Unless he is getting lynched (and we will still lynch you, mind this) You should say who you have found as scum, or confirmed town. You can take your strongest town read and then strongest scum read, and compare them. if the are two different alignments, its pretty obvious who is who. IF you REALLY want to play like a traditional cop. then select one of the two names as yourself, this way you can see if they are the same alignment as you (town) or not (scum) Seriously OP imo ^^ we also hav veteran/vigi who are strong roles as well. And as shown by last game, JK can be stupidly good as well. I like this setup for town, Framer does make things tricky, but the cop check is still reliable (odds of you two picking same target are rare, this is why you shouldnt claim if you think you have found 1 scum alone anyway, IF he was fraimed: our cop is dead and we lose a townie). Framer is actually a rather strong role in and of itself. I still like this setup. basically all the tracker/watcher/NN stuff looks borderline useless to me, as iv already stated. Obviously nobody should claim. But they arnt the strongest of roles. Here he actually admits that his other posting has been useless, but then adds yet another useless post talking about how "strong" the town roles are by saying a lot of self-evident stuff. He's posting for the sake of posting. I especially like the part where he says that he'd lynch a claimed parity cop. On June 24 2013 13:37 Xzavier wrote: If i was parity cop i would claim NN lol. be the best fucking play. But seriously dont do this. Im just reading from phone now. will post a case or two in the morning. Whens the deadline? The other noteworthy post where he literally says nothing. The first sentence is meaningless. He promises more activity later, which I never really like to see, particularly when that activity doesn't occur. Maybe it didn't happen because there was no pressure on him? He ends with a question that doesn't matter because he knows that the deadline is about 2 days away. The exact time doesn't matter at all. I can see a scum Xzav posting this in order to "interact" a little without doing anything. Everything else in his filter is spam. Look at it yourselves. ##Vote: Xzavier Keep in mind, as you read Xzav, that this is not a total noob player. I don't want to rely on meta heavily (at all, really), but at least observe the fact that he does know what he's doing as town. He played a strong town game in XLII, but he is anything but that this game. At the very least, he is certainly experienced enough to know not to lynch a claimed blue. The "noob town" defense doesn't hold water with Xzav because he's clearly capable of being a strong townie. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 25 2013 11:00 Aquanim wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 10:44 Chromatically wrote: I think that Xzavier is actually the one I want to lynch today. Is there anything in particular that makes you want to lynch Xzavier over Onegu? Their posting to date seems to be of a similar character to me, except that Onegu has been in the thread while interesting things have happened and still hasn't contributed much. What I like about Onegu is that he's offered his opinions on people and cases without being prompted. There's been absolutely no pressure on him all game, but he's still contributed a bit. He has a lot of "coaching" type posts where he gives people advice. These feel slightly town to me when they're coupled with his scumhunting because it sounds like he's trying to improve town atmosphere. Filtering him, there's not as much as I thought there was, but the timing of his posts even with the total lack of attention on him is town to me. I would definitely like to see more from him so I can upgrade him to a town read. He's said that he'll post stuff in a few hours, so I'll assume that he's going to follow through on that for now. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 25 2013 11:09 Xzavier wrote: okay, i just want to say that half of you are fucking retarded, now, im watching day9. after him, im going to show you all how fucking retarded you are. Wow, you replied quickly for someone who has been mysteriously absent all day. Also very, very defensive. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
And Aqua, who's your top read? Everyone, Xzav? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
I'm not used to prompting you for reads and opinions. Don't you have any thoughts on the events of today? hz/Spicy/Tofu? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
My point about you being strong town was just that you know how to scumread. It doesn't matter if you were wrong before, I saw how you know what scumhunting looks like and how to do it. Are you planning on not scumhunting at all this game because it "didn't work out for you" last game? I sure hope not. Your scumread on Aqua is weakly reasoned. You accuse him of posting nothing and shopping thread sentiment, when you posted nothing and then dropped thread sentiment. If someone could tell me the actual points against Aqua, that would be nice, because he really doesn't look like the best lynch for today. Everyone with their vote not on Xzav should move it there or explain why. He's posted fluff when he's clearly capable of scumhunting, and only now comes in with a bad read on Aqua sheeping thread sentiment. He's being extremely defensive in an unnecessary way after one vote on him. Not to mention how he was clearly active lurking when he responded 5 minutes after my case on him after posting nothing all day. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
The point was just that you are capable of scumhunting. You're not doing it. Why? If you really think that Aqua is scum, put some real reasons up. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
However, if someone has demonstrated a capability for making cases/scumhunting/not being utterly useless/etc. there is no reason why that capability should disappear. I won't magically choose to start playing worse just for the sake of changing my playstyle. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
I'll do another case on Xzav soon that hopefully clearly demonstrates why he's by far the best lynch. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
He's mad that we're suspicious of him. We're suspicious of him because he's been posting without scumhunting. He's still not scumhunting. His only scumread is Aqua (who happens to be the easiest mislynch right now), based on one post . He hasn't given any good reasons. If he was town, he would be scumhunting and honestly showing us that he wants to help town. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
WHAT | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
I think that Stim's "meta" helps him in this case. The only real point that it's possible to bring against him right now is that he's hardcore lurking (which is pretty bad). However, it really is the standard lurker lynch coinflip. Stim has already shown that he lurks as town. He's lurking harder this game, sure, but Stim isn't a contributor as town or scum. He'd make a great vigi shot, though. The thing is, Stim isn't even trying to act like he's contributing. He's doing nothing, but he's not posting fluff to make it seem like he's contributing. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
It's one thing to be more cautious after a game, it's another to not scumhunt at all. If he were a truly panicked scum i would think he would listen to everyone and start making cases, not go crazy. The whole "If Xzav were scum, he would do x" argument is WIFOM. Maybe he would do that as scum. Maybe he's not and he's trying to trick us. Maybe he's not doing it anyway because he doesn't know how to. He might not be making cases because it's hard to scumhunt as scum. He might not be making cases so people think that it's a "genuine townie reaction". He might not be making cases so that you make the exact argument you're making now. There are a number of reasons why he would react the way he has, and it doesn't make him townier at all. That sort of argument is what makes up most of his defense and now your defense of him, which is why I found his defense thoroughly unconvincing. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 00:41 Hurricane Sponge wrote: For me, Xzavier is definitely something big. Could be SK, could be scum, could be... big. He has veiled references that he will be useful Day 2. If his play doesn't shape up in Day 2, I'd be for a Xzavier lynch, but I'm willing to give him that chance. But why aren't you on board for a Xzav lynch today if you think that he's scum or SK? It's very easy for scum to promise future contributions. Xzav has already did this once, but no one said anything when he didn't deliver. Delaying contribution until pressure has subsided is useful for scum. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
The Case for Stim He's a lurker. Lurking is scummy. He lurked as town last game. But he still might be scum. He was active in the pregame, but hasn't contributed. + Show Spoiler + Xzavier was also active in the pregame, but he hasn't contributed. He's also been acting like he contributes when he really hasn't. So it's pretty much a coinflip, but you should just vote Stim anyway. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
The Xzavier Saga --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Episode I: The Xzavier Menace Early game, Xzavier posts fluff that helps him blend in with the town, without doing any sort of scumhunting. The scum motivation for this is to blend in, look like he's contributing, and avoid attention without trying to find scum. I'll just repost my previous case on him, focusing on this part of his play: On June 25 2013 11:05 Chromatically wrote: Most of the Xzavier stuff is really obvious: look at early day 1 and his filter. He spams a lot, posts things that are meaningless, etc. His posts feel loose and casual, but that could easily be an act. Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 12:35 Xzavier wrote: Fuck me, i just typed somethign really nice all out and accidentally switched windows. Take two: First actual post of this game: This is my first game involving tracker/watcher/ect. Okay, from what iv learned so far is that town has some borderline useless roles (tracker watcher) The opprotunities where they would be beneficial are so rare that its hardly useful, and with the exisance of a NN it could all be BS. So there really is barely any information to gain, and if you do get any of this slightly more than useless info, its unreliable. But, the flipside. We have Parity cop who can effectively check two people every night. He shouldnt claim. Unless he is getting lynched (and we will still lynch you, mind this) You should say who you have found as scum, or confirmed town. You can take your strongest town read and then strongest scum read, and compare them. if the are two different alignments, its pretty obvious who is who. IF you REALLY want to play like a traditional cop. then select one of the two names as yourself, this way you can see if they are the same alignment as you (town) or not (scum) Seriously OP imo ^^ we also hav veteran/vigi who are strong roles as well. And as shown by last game, JK can be stupidly good as well. I like this setup for town, Framer does make things tricky, but the cop check is still reliable (odds of you two picking same target are rare, this is why you shouldnt claim if you think you have found 1 scum alone anyway, IF he was fraimed: our cop is dead and we lose a townie). Framer is actually a rather strong role in and of itself. I still like this setup. basically all the tracker/watcher/NN stuff looks borderline useless to me, as iv already stated. Obviously nobody should claim. But they arnt the strongest of roles. Here he actually admits that his other posting has been useless, but then adds yet another useless post talking about how "strong" the town roles are by saying a lot of self-evident stuff. He's posting for the sake of posting. I especially like the part where he says that he'd lynch a claimed parity cop. Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 13:37 Xzavier wrote: If i was parity cop i would claim NN lol. be the best fucking play. But seriously dont do this. Im just reading from phone now. will post a case or two in the morning. Whens the deadline? The other noteworthy post where he literally says nothing. The first sentence is meaningless. He promises more activity later, which I never really like to see, particularly when that activity doesn't occur. Maybe it didn't happen because there was no pressure on him? He ends with a question that doesn't matter because he knows that the deadline is about 2 days away. The exact time doesn't matter at all. I can see a scum Xzav posting this in order to "interact" a little without doing anything. Everything else in his filter is spam. Look at it yourselves. ##Vote: Xzavier Keep in mind, as you read Xzav, that this is not a total noob player. I don't want to rely on meta heavily (at all, really), but at least observe the fact that he does know what he's doing as town. He played a strong town game in XLII, but he is anything but that this game. At the very least, he is certainly experienced enough to know not to lynch a claimed blue. The "noob town" defense doesn't hold water with Xzav because he's clearly capable of being a strong townie. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Episode II: Attack of the Townies Xzavier disappears all day long when the pressure is off of him. This shows scum motivation because he doesn't contribute to town as long as no one is paying attention to him. Xzavier shows up again only when the pressure is on him, because he only cares about defending himself. Not much to say here. It's theoretically possible that he was busy the entire time, and just happened to pop in and start posting right after the pressure was on, but I think that's unlikely. A more likely scenario was that he was active lurking, and only started posting when he needed to deflet suspicion off of him. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Episode III: Revenge of the Xzavier Xzavier's return is extremely agressive at first, but his agression is being faked. He posts EVEN MORE FLUFF, and no scumhunting. His vote goes on Aquanim, who was at the time the most suspicious player to the town. He has minimal reasoning for voting Aqua, showing that he is still not interested in scumhunting and just wants to deflect suspicion. On June 25 2013 11:09 Xzavier wrote: okay, i just want to say that half of you are fucking retarded, now, im watching day9. after him, im going to show you all how fucking retarded you are. Wow, if we're all so retarded, you must have some really good reasons why you're town, right? Nope. So why would a town Xzav honestly think that the suspicion on him is stupid if he doesn't have a good defense? Scum often act like this to make themselves seem genuine and that the suspicion on them is misplaced (see: Kickstart in XXXI). Here's his amazing return post: everything everybody has said about NN has meant nill to me right now, except for the people asking for him to claim. Because him being alive benefits scum more than town, because even if we know who he is, scum can still claim that it was NN and we wouldnt know different, unless you wanted to tail this guy the entire game, essentially wasting a blue role. im lynching somebody if they claim NN. im sorry, i just am. because it doesnt benefit anything, even if your are NN, thats unfortunate, your dead. its like miller, you can claim it all you want, but on my list scum would claim miller too, so it isnt a defense, its just unfortunate circumstances. More policy/claim garbage? This is the least helpful thing that he could possibly be saying. Okay, last game during day1 i went holy fucking shit hard, made a few big blunders, almost got a town lynched over a scum, and that seriously hurt my confidence going into the rest of the game. I dont want to be the center of attention trying to direct town discussion if i cant handle it (as shown last game) It would be much better for me to analyze people, call them bad, and find scum. then to try to be mr. sheriff and totally fuck up the game. Also, posting the list that is located on page 1 is scummy as shit to me, that is useless contribution, because its so much easier to open up page 1 in a new tab to find filters, it literally doesnt benefit anything at all. IF i WAS scum this game, i would try to do exactly what i did last game, because if i made town-bandwagons it would look like last game where i was town, and everybody would just call me a bad townie. First, he tries to excuse his lack of contribution. Then, he repeats an easy suspicion that has already been stated several times. And then he uses the "If I were scum..." argument. This argument is WIFOM, as I've already said, but it also is very easy for scum to use (I should know, I've used it myself as scum). Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 07:05 LoneMeow wrote: Xzavier, I still don't like your filter. Practically just setup speculation, no scum hunting or reads. I want to lynch you. I'm not all that comfortable with lynching hzflank, in fact I'd rather not. I read him as town-ish. StiMaDDict, start participating in some way. Who's your top scum read, why? fyfy, you say you'd "rather lynch someone scummier", tell me who'd that be? ##Vote: Xzavier The bold is kinda bullshit? it would be one thing if you said "i kinda just want to lynch you because your lurking hardcore and didnt do that last game!" then i woulda been okay with it, but because you didnt it makes me wonder. What scumhunting was their to do when everybody has 1-2 posts that they most probably arnt going to give away anything. seriously, how bad would somebody have to be to fuck up their first post? misread there role pm? I really dont think thats enough to vote somebody, Asking for fyfy who they would rather lynch instead of encouraging the person your voting for also seems strange. its like saying this is a pressure vote, then taking off the pressure. Its like your trying to pressure somebody but you dont want to commit yourself, like your afraid of making too many people upset. That or your trying to pressure like three people at once, which is impossible with only 1 vote. T.T to me you seem like your trying to press as many buttons as possible and hoping to hit something, in essence thats the plan, but you cant do it all at the same time. A completely noncomittal "scumread". He says things like "kinda bullshit", "it makes me wonder", "It's like your trying to", etc. He's lightly throwing suspicion, but he never actually calls meow scum. Note how he leaves the out at the end, incase he ever needs to artifically switch his read to town. This is a classic wishy-washy scum post. It leaves it open for him to vote Meow later, if that helps him, or to call him town, without arousing suspicion. Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 12:36 Aquanim wrote: On June 25 2013 12:25 Chromatically wrote: Nothing else to say, Aqua? I'm not used to prompting you for reads and opinions. Don't you have any thoughts on the events of today? hz/Spicy/Tofu? I'm not interested in lynching any of those three today, if that's what you're asking. I can see the thought process of all three and I can easily see all of it coming from a town mindset, even if I don't agree with a lot of it. My current suspicions lie with Onegu and Xzavier, since they have posted a fair bit but actually said little to nothing of value. This post just moved Aqua to my number 1 scum list. ##VOTE Aquanim uhhh. dude, this is your first post in 12 hours, and all you did was a gree with everybody, and say whats already been said. your filter isnt that impressive and you havnt reacted or responded to pressure. you talked alot when it was about the NN meta, which all iv gleaned from is lynch anybody who claims NN at any point in the game. Because it means that they are scum, if they WERE Noisy neighbor, then they would be okay getting lynched, post all of their biggest cases before they died, become confirmed (and dead) town. We re-read his case. If its strong we lynch who he suspects and win. That would be the best way to play noisy neighbor. Claiming NN to stay alive is pretty pointless, you can say it, but it wont keep you alive. So you pretty much were encouraging a useless may as well be spam topic. you havnt actually done anything pro-town, and are using the heat on me and Onegu as a cover in order to not make a splash and still get a mislynch. And this is where he votes for Aqua. Coincidentally, Aqua happened to be under the most pressure at that time, even though no one had actually given reasons. Xzav doesn't have reasons either (legit reasons, at least). This post is a pure sheep onto town sentiment. I also think it's interesting that the first sentance applies totally to Xzav. If Xzav thinks those things are scummy, he should realize how scummy he looks. But he doesn't think that he looks scummy, because We're all "fucking retards" for voting him. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Episode IV: A New Lynch Xzav is clearly the scummiest person in this game. He tried to blend in early game, and didn't try to find scum at all. He dropped out when the pressure was off of him, and only showed up again when there was a case on him. And his defense is only more fluff and trying to redirect suspicion without having any real scumreads by bandwagoning on town sentiment. Lynch him. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
I do think that Spicy can be convinced to switch to Xzavier, so we should be fine if Onegu moves to Aqua (which is what it looks like he'll do). I still haven't heard any points for why Aqua is scum from anyone on his wagon. Can we have an official Votecount? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 04:00 Xzavier wrote: Also im not posting town reads. I dont want to inject wifom. Is this a scumslip? Check my thinking here. There's nothing WIFOM at all about townies posting all their reads before death. Scum Xzav might have thought about posting his "town reads", realized he wasn't sure how he should read his buddies, and then said this without thinking. @Xzavier What's WIFOM about posting town reads? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
Not sure what it means until I see the flip, but not having an opinion on either of these candidates is weird. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
What do you think about Onegu? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
It helps that I have a town read on everyone on the Xzav wagon, so I really don't think that scum is pushing this wagon at all. I'd be surprised if there are no scum at all on a town wagon. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
And if you put your vote on someone random, and then don't push their lynch at all, you are wasting your vote. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=417692¤tpage=25#495 I don't see how that's at all "silly probably purposefully bad logic". | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
If we were to do some voteswitch shennanies, I assume that you'd want to switch to Onegu? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
Your case only looks at his early posting, but look at his recent posting, because that's where the towniness is. When I said "my case on Xzav", I meant this one: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=417692¤tpage=25#495 Has everyone read this? I'm getting the feeling that it was missed. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 09:24 Aquanim wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 09:19 Chromatically wrote: I also like the part where he said that I was letting you do all of the posting. If we were to do some voteswitch shennanies, I assume that you'd want to switch to Onegu? Not any more. I'd prefer to let him post for another day and improve my read on him, I can still believe his play from town or from scum at this point. If we absolutely had to switch, I'd say Alakaslam or StiMaDDict, but they would basically be policy lynches for me. I don't think this thread is going to progress much until Xzavier flips though, so I'm very much opposed to shenanigans at this point. Let's face it, if we don't lynch him today, we'll spend tomorrow deciding whether to lynch him too. I'd prefer to move on. That's a good point about "moving on" thread-wise that I hadn't thought of. I wasn't really seriously considering switching, just thinking about what would be possible if I had a sudden mind change. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 09:49 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 09:27 Chromatically wrote: Your case on Sponge? I have Sponge (and you) as strong town. I didn't much like Sponge's early game policy stuff either, but his recent posting is really townie. Look at page 2-3 of his filter particularly. He's freely offering opinions, posting a lot, interacting with others in a very townie way. Your case only looks at his early posting, but look at his recent posting, because that's where the towniness is. When I said "my case on Xzav", I meant this one: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=417692¤tpage=25#495 Has everyone read this? I'm getting the feeling that it was missed. I dont like the vote for the lurker as it seemed an easy cop out. Then his switch to xzavier doesnt help as i think xzavier isnt scum. He has picked up commenting about cases a lot more, but that's to be expected when accused. There was a huge shift in his play style before and after my vote on him. Perhaps he became more active to push the mislynch? I honestly dont know but looking at his filter it just feels scummy. And your new case didnt really add anything new, just commented on xzaviers posts. At this point xzavier is going to be lynched barring some big last minute vote switches. When accused, scum want to push suspicion off of themselves at all costs. That's not what I see as the purpose of his posting. He's honestly scumhunting and interacting with the thread in a very townie way. The Xzavier-style return is worse because Xzavier's focus is clearly not on finding scum, it's on defending himself. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 09:41 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 09:11 Chromatically wrote: Spicy and hz, did you read my case? It didn't convince you at all? And if you put your vote on someone random, and then don't push their lynch at all, you are wasting your vote. I read it and it did not convince me. I will respect your time and go back to read it again though. Currently I have read some parts of the thread many times but other parts only once or twice. I put my vote on someone who I thought more scummy than Xzavier. I still think that, but you can see above what my reasons for now voting Xzavier are. What about Xzavier's actions makes you think that he is town? I read how you think that scum would be pushing for someone else right now, but I'd like to see what things he's done that make you read town. I realize that you've already voted Xzav (although I disagree with your reasons for switching), but I'm interested in hearing more of your thoughts and more arguments for Xzav being town. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 10:01 Alakaslam wrote: Well, Chromatically, I do find you have accused a lot of people. Which is good, but then you don't say why you have dropped someone. Just read your filter, but then I may have missed. Do you still think hzflank is scum? On June 25 2013 06:31 Chromatically wrote: I am far more comfortable with hz now. His theory is really quite ridiculous, and I had a hard time thinking that he actually believed in his case. This post is so, so town, though: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 05:06 hzflank wrote: On June 25 2013 03:41 Chromatically wrote: lol 10/10 conspiracy theory of the century Now explain to me why this master scum plot is more likely than us both being town. It is a conspiracy theory, which we both know means that I have a lot riding on it as I stand to look like a fool if it all goes wrong. I started out by coming to the conclusion that you were either both town or both scum. Aqua's first post looked like a weak poke on a Chrom that he perceived to be town. It was like he had already decided that you were of the same alignment as he was, so I thought he either had a town read that he was trying to confirm, or he knew that you were scum. I already thought that the first part of Aqua's post was a bit scummy, so I hoped to see some interaction between you and him. Your first post in response contained this: On June 24 2013 20:43 Chromatically wrote: If you wanted to know about someone, you could just asked me. I'm not just going to randomly post reads if I'm not going to push for their lynch, but I'll definitely tell you what I think of someone or who my scumreads are. Why wouldn't you ask me for my scumreads if you wanted them? Probably because that's not actually what you want at all. Someone else asked me for scumreads, and I posted mine right below your post, but you haven't reacted to that at all. Does this point still stand even after I've posted my scumreads? Or did your opinion not change at all for some reason? In the above quote you referred to your previous post here: On June 24 2013 13:29 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 13:12 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Chromatically, do you have any scumreads? Right now, I'm looking at Xzavier and hzflank. Both have posted a bit, but neither have been scumhunting. hz's recent post makes me feel a little better, but it did only come when I specifically asked him and I don't really agree with it. That doesn't necessarily make him scum though. There are also some other small things that bother me, but I'll elaborate on those later. Now, at this point what do you think Aqua's reply should be? Your scum read post did not really contain anything substantial and in fact I would say that I was in fact scum hunting (I had poked several people). I thought to myself: If Aqua takes his vote off of Chrom before asking Chrom for more info on his reads, then it is because Aqua does not need to know Chrom's reads. Aqua even says this himself in his next post: On June 24 2013 21:08 Aquanim wrote: Those reads were pretty weak, I'd like to see more from you. And then in that same post he says: On June 24 2013 21:08 Aquanim wrote: tl;dr I had uneasy feelings about you but I feel a lot better after reading this post So Aqua does not get what he wants from you, but for some reason feels better about you, which is why I do not think that you are both town. If you were both town then that exchange should not of ended so easily. On June 25 2013 04:27 Chromatically wrote: Your explanation's fair. It still doesn't excuse the large amount of fluff and general bad feel I get from your early posting (not that's really explainable). I assume that you're busy right now answering my other questions about your case, so in addition: On June 25 2013 04:17 hzflank wrote: On June 25 2013 04:06 FirmTofu wrote: On June 25 2013 03:41 Chromatically wrote: What's really bizarre is how quickly Tofu agreed with this case. You'd better explain yourself too. I agreed with it in the sense that it was a plausible theory, not that it was particularly likely. For the record I have you both pegged as town and I think you are both wasting precious time accusing one another. His conspiracy idea arose mainly because you accused him of being scum. I see his post as a long-winded retaliation against your credibility to ensure that no one bandwagons him to oblivion. While I may obviously be incorrect, it was not retaliation. Before Chrom voted for me I had already decided that if Aqua moves his vote off of Chrom and then Chrom makes a case against me then they are working together. When did you decide this? Right when you saw Aqua's case on me? Right when Aqua said he felt better about you (above). I read that at the same time as I read your previous post. The exchange just did not go as I would expect it to between two town members. The logic is convoluted and wrong, but I have a hard time believing that scum hz made it all up. A scum hz would have to: 1) come up with this theory (even though they're not scumhunting) 2) explain his reasoning in a clear way that "makes sense" from a town perspective I can't see a way that scum hz develops this reasoning, so clearly from a town perspective, while actually being scum. His next post: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 05:37 hzflank wrote: Aqua asked Tofu twice for his opinions on you. This means that if I assume that you and Aqua are scum, then Tofu must be town. There is no way that one scum would insist on an opinion of another scum from the third scum. Also, I would think that Aqua and Toku are not scumbuddies, since Tofu's opinion on you seemed important to Aqua. My take on the reason for that was to establish that Tofu thinks you (Chrom) town. Since Tofu is one of the more active posters so far, if he thinks you town he would be easier to get on my wagon and may even make some good posts to convince others. So as you suggested, my strong town read on Tofu is dependent on my scum read on you and Aqua. This is some of the most convoluted association logic I've ever heard (coming from me). Once again, I can't see scum coming up with this reasoning just in order to justify their read change. A scum hz could have just said that "it was the only way my theory worked" or something and been fine, but this logic is done from a town perspective, I think. ##Unvote However, I encourage you to look through XXXIII if you have the time (my profile). I tunneled two townies all game long and lead a voteswitch off of the GF because I was convinced that they were scum together. Not so much based on their individual actions, but more on the preflip associations I thought that I saw. The lesson I learned was that preflip association cases are really, really, bad. Your case is 100% preflip associations, but they never work out. I would be very interested in hearing a case on Aqua based on his actions alone, if you really think that he's scum. If Aqua flips red, then that's a good time to go look for his associations to others. In short, no. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 10:10 hzflank wrote: I'm actually in quite a good position. If Xzavier flips town then I don't look scummy. If Xsavier flips red then a day 2 case against me is beneficial anyway, since there are only 3 other likely scum targets and I can just aim at one of them for my defense. Even if I get lynched day 2, as long as the power roles are being used on the 4 main scum targets then you are likely to get a scum lynch on day 3. In short: a super late day 1 wagon on me would be a terrible idea for the town. (Not that it was suggested). ..what? Why are you thinking about what makes you look scummy? Why aren't you lynching based on who you actually think is scum? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 10:20 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 10:12 Chromatically wrote: On June 26 2013 10:10 hzflank wrote: I'm actually in quite a good position. If Xzavier flips town then I don't look scummy. If Xsavier flips red then a day 2 case against me is beneficial anyway, since there are only 3 other likely scum targets and I can just aim at one of them for my defense. Even if I get lynched day 2, as long as the power roles are being used on the 4 main scum targets then you are likely to get a scum lynch on day 3. In short: a super late day 1 wagon on me would be a terrible idea for the town. (Not that it was suggested). ..what? Why are you thinking about what makes you look scummy? Why aren't you lynching based on who you actually think is scum? Because it is not a one day game. I am lynching based on which lynch I think is most beneficial to the town, as I said when I voted. In fact, at this point I think it would be bad for the town for me to try to get people to vote for the people who I think have the most chance of flipping red. The town wincondition is based on lynching scum. (Note that it's not at all based on whether you die or not.) Voting and pushing a scum lynch is the only way to achieve that. You are arguing that it's more beneficial to vote for people who you think are town. This doesn't make sense. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
As opposed to just lynching who you think will flip scum, and then worrying about the other scum later. If we lynch scum day 1, town has a massive, massive advantage. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 10:44 hzflank wrote: It's not like Xzav is a hundred time less likely to be scum than others. Additionally, I did not want to put a lot of effort into creating the late counter-wagon because I was hoping that some other people would get moving with it. I tried to stimulate that conversation a few hours ago but no one moved on it. The reason that I should not of been the one to start the other wagon is that even if I did and Xzav flips red, or the other wagon flips green, that gives me no information as to who the scumbuddies are and no be honest I don't think it would of given the town enough info either. If someone else had been more proactive in starting the counter wagon then it would of given better scum reading material. Don't you have a townread on Xzav? You were defending him not too long ago. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
hz looks pretty town despite his wierd logic because there's really no reason for scum to draw suspicion to themselves by switching that late as the lynch was already secure. Same thing for Alaka, less confident on that. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 11:04 StiMaDDict wrote: God damn it, I I didn't even fucking finished writing everything.. @Chromatically: Dude, calm down. Why are you going around asking everyone what their read is on you? I'm not just going to give you my gut feel or a couple of short paragraphs pretending I know who you are. I would rather post something that is of some substance with proper analysis. To put it simply, I refuse your request. You have no idea at all of whether I'm town? There's no reason not to say that, it just gives town more information. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 02:23 Onegu wrote: Between xzavier and Aqua. Except just a few posts earlier, he says that he has a null read on Xzav and a scum read on Aqua: On June 26 2013 02:19 Onegu wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 02:01 FirmTofu wrote: Even now, it is still possible that Xzavier lives because we only have 5 votes. We should try convincing hzflank or Alakaslam to switch their votes. As I suspect the Mafia team is as follows... Xzavier SpicyDinosaur Onegu They are trying not to make it obvious that they want to keep Xzavier alive. You can see how they are frantically looking for other scapegoats to shift attention off of Xzavier, but don't have much of a case. Furthermore, my preliminary assessment of Alakaslam speaks to an SK mindset. I will go into further detail when it becomes applicable on Day 2. To be honest I dont care who is killed if Xzavier flips town my vote will go on aquanim and if he flips scum I will vote Spicydinosaur. My current read on Xzavier is null with scum reads on alakaslam and aqua. With every post Alakaslam makes he looks more and more like noob scum to me. So he doesn't care about the lynch, even though he thinks that Aqua is scummier. Why wouldn't he vote Aqua, and why doesn't a townie care about the lynch in the first place? If Onegu was scum, however, he wouldn't care whether Aqua or Xzav are lynched as he knows that they're both town. He also wouldn't want to have his vote on one of them when they flipped because it would draw suspicion to himself. Side note: this works just as well if Aqua is scum. Onegu wouldn't want to vote Aqua because they're scumbuddies and doesn't want to be on the mislynch wagon. Thoughts? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
I'm going to have another long look at Spicy and see if I can find some good reasons why he wasn't voting Xzav. It's possible that he might have been avoiding that for no reason to avoid suspicion. I'm off the mind that the Xzav lynch had good reasoning behind it. Knowing what we knew, I would lynch him again (and a lot of strong town agreed with the reasoning, it seems). | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
I'd still recommend a vigi shot in Stim. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 12:50 FirmTofu wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 12:43 Chromatically wrote: Interestingly enough, it's very much not impossible that none of the scum were voting for Xzav. I'd still recommend a vigi shot in Stim. I disagree. vigi should shoot the target most likely to flip scum, and that is most definitely Onegu at this point. P.S. I wouldn't mind Spicy either *wink wink* It's obviously possible to read Onegu, and there's good discussion that can be had about whether to lynch him and why, and it would give information on others. Stim, on the other hand, is lurky and impossible to read if he doesn't post more. There's almost no discussion that can be had about him, so a lynch on him would probably result in a day with minimal discussion, bad for town. Worse case scenario for Stim is that we lose a player who wasn't going to post anyway, whereas worst case for Onegu is we lose a townie who could be helpful. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 13:01 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Humor me. What's the difference between StiM and LoneMeow? A vacation? Lonemeow is more actively looking for scum, albeit in a lurky way. You can see that he's pressured some people and interacted with the thread a bit. Stim is more opportunistic. He votes Aqua as the wagon is building up, and comes up with a weak case on him later. Not super strong reads on either of them (because lurk), but Stim is scummier. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 26 2013 16:22 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 11:02 Chromatically wrote: I am very surprised that both of them flipped as town. I have a lot of strong town reads, but I clearly need to rethink some of them as a) there was probably scum on the Xzav lynch and b) there's not enough people left that are in my null-scum area. hz looks pretty town despite his wierd logic because there's really no reason for scum to draw suspicion to themselves by switching that late as the lynch was already secure. Same thing for Alaka, less confident on that. I don't follow. hz looks town because he did something suspicious? We can save this discussion for Day 2 if you think the information is sensitive, but don't let me forget this point, Chromatically. On June 26 2013 16:42 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Just finished hz's filter. The town consensus is that he's very pro-town. I don't see it as quite that clear-cut, but I will defer to the town's judgement. He had some pro-town stuff leading up to the Xzavier lynch, but he's also had a couple of real head-scratchers. I won't quote them unless asked, because I want to reiterate that I don't think he's scum and I don't think investigating hz is a productive use of our time right now. I have yet to go over Onegu's filter, but his upcoming morning mega-post will go a long way in helping me decide his alignment. I'm not ready to crucify him JUST for saying he thinks Alakaslam is the scummiest player on the board while Xzavier and Aqua were also Top 3 (which is what his apathy regarding the Day One vote boiled down to). His reads will help me decide. My thoughts about hz and Onegu (vote-wise) are related. Scum's objective is to blend in and not draw attention to themselves. When scum sees a mislynch wagon forming, they have two options: 1) Sheep the wagon and otherwise push it to make sure that it goes through. Scum only needs to do this if the wagon might fail. This is probably not what happened yesterday. Most likely, there was no scum in danger of being lynched because Xzav was the clear, clear, forerunner. There was no need for scum to draw attention to themselves by sheeping that wagon because it would (and did) go through anyway. 2) Avoid the wagon and call the lynchee town a lot so that they look good after the flip. Scum will only do this is the wagon will go through without them and there's no danger of a scum lynch. This is the most likely scenario for yesterday's lynch. Scum sees that the wagon will go through and starts resisting it for town cred after a flip. It's important to distinguish between townies that honestly thought that the wagon was bad (they have shown their reasoning) and scum who artificially called the wagon bad (they have no reasoning). hz chose option 1 by sheeping the wagon. There was no scum motivation for this because the wagon was clearly going to succeed. Onegu chose option 2 by avoiding voting entirely. The scum motivation is to avoid being on the mislynch for town cred afterwards. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
It's hard to tell if his reasons for not voting Xzav are legit, given that I disagreed with them. They could be real or artificial as far as I can tell, I can't get anything from that. What I don't like (and this is a general statement about Spicy, Stim, and Onegu) is that when your vote is not on a leading wagon, you should be doing your ABSOLUTE BEST to push your read. This is especially true if you have a town read on the leader. A townie would do everything that they can to prevent a mislynch. Spicy defends Xzav a little, but then drops it with this post: On June 26 2013 09:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 09:11 Chromatically wrote: Spicy and hz, did you read my case? It didn't convince you at all? And if you put your vote on someone random, and then don't push their lynch at all, you are wasting your vote. I read it and wasnt convinced. I had spent most of my time after the case posted defending my defense of Xzavier and then had work. I did update the case based off of his then vote on stim. No one else has commented on my case and 1/2 the thread thinks im scum for defending xzavier so theres nothing i can do at this point. I'd like your comment on my case. He backs off of defending Xzav because "1/2 the thread thinks im scum" for it. This is a clear exaggeration. At most, ONE person had called him scum for defending Xzavier. Is this overstatement a sign of a scum persecution complex? Maybe. I also really don't like how he gave up on Xzav so easily. Maybe it's just a playstyle difference, but if I think someone is about to be mislynched, I would be posting a TON, urging voteswitches, and aggressively trying to move the lynch. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 27 2013 01:00 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 27 2013 00:47 Chromatically wrote: About Spicy It's hard to tell if his reasons for not voting Xzav are legit, given that I disagreed with them. They could be real or artificial as far as I can tell, I can't get anything from that. What I don't like (and this is a general statement about Spicy, Stim, and Onegu) is that when your vote is not on a leading wagon, you should be doing your ABSOLUTE BEST to push your read. This is especially true if you have a town read on the leader. A townie would do everything that they can to prevent a mislynch. Spicy defends Xzav a little, but then drops it with this post: On June 26 2013 09:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: On June 26 2013 09:11 Chromatically wrote: Spicy and hz, did you read my case? It didn't convince you at all? And if you put your vote on someone random, and then don't push their lynch at all, you are wasting your vote. I read it and wasnt convinced. I had spent most of my time after the case posted defending my defense of Xzavier and then had work. I did update the case based off of his then vote on stim. No one else has commented on my case and 1/2 the thread thinks im scum for defending xzavier so theres nothing i can do at this point. I'd like your comment on my case. He backs off of defending Xzav because "1/2 the thread thinks im scum" for it. This is a clear exaggeration. At most, ONE person had called him scum for defending Xzavier. Is this overstatement a sign of a scum persecution complex? Maybe. I also really don't like how he gave up on Xzav so easily. Maybe it's just a playstyle difference, but if I think someone is about to be mislynched, I would be posting a TON, urging voteswitches, and aggressively trying to move the lynch. That last part you quoted was in reference to pushing hurricane, not defending xzavier as the previous sentence was talking about hurricane's case. Immediately after i posted a defense of xzavier i got replies from you, lone, onegu, and tofu. Perhaps its because i was on the defensive most of D1 so the quick replies by a bunch of people got me into that feeling. I tried my best to counter but it went nowhere. My defense of xzavier was based off of meta, and people didnt agree with it, so what else could i have said? I would just be repeating myself. It feels weird that it looks scummy that i didnt defend xzavier enough and yet i look scummy for tofu for defending too much (or at all). Also please look at my recent post about tofu about not pushing scum reads. Was your townread on Xzav solely based on meta? The problem that Tofu and I have with your defense of Xzav is the same. A Townie would: 1) Vote Xzav if they think that he's scum. 2) Vote someone else and push them really hard if they think that Xzav is scum, but someone else is worse. 3) Defend Xzav really hard if they have a townread. Scum would: 5) Defend Xzav a little, but not enough to move the vote, for town cread. Your defense of Xzav looks much more like Scum option 5 than it does Townie option 2 or 3 because you weren't pushing Sponge hard and you didn't defend Xzav hard. You're defending Xzav just enough to look good after the flip, but not enough to actually move the lynch. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
He thought that you were scummier, but after pushing you he saw that no one else was willing to vote you. Instead of wasting his vote on someone who wouldn't be lynched (you), he moves to his second-best scumread (Xzav). | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 27 2013 01:31 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 27 2013 01:23 Chromatically wrote: Spicy, I think that Tofu's actions around the lynch were fine. He thought that you were scummier, but after pushing you he saw that no one else was willing to vote you. Instead of wasting his vote on someone who wouldn't be lynched (you), he moves to his second-best scumread (Xzav). please look at what i wrote again. It is clear he said his second best read was stim Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 01:03 FirmTofu wrote: I've skimmed through the thread to get a handle on where people are leaning. Scenario 1: Xzavier is town Mafia should be distancing themselves from the lynch and somewhat defending him. Scenario 2: Xzavier is mafia Mafia should be vehemently arguing in his defense while also trying to distance themselves from him. It's a balancing act that is hard to do. Keep an eye out for people who fall into the latter category for now. On another note, I agree with Hurricane that StiM is the best lynch for today. However, letting Aqua die is simply not an option. We only lynch StiM if we know we can get enough votes. He then does nothing with trying to get stim lynched and just sheeps onto xzavier. Oh yeah, that's a good point that I missed. Just a few posts later he says: + Show Spoiler + On June 26 2013 02:01 FirmTofu wrote: Even now, it is still possible that Xzavier lives because we only have 5 votes. We should try convincing hzflank or Alakaslam to switch their votes. As I suspect the Mafia team is as follows... Xzavier SpicyDinosaur Onegu They are trying not to make it obvious that they want to keep Xzavier alive. You can see how they are frantically looking for other scapegoats to shift attention off of Xzavier, but don't have much of a case. Furthermore, my preliminary assessment of Alakaslam speaks to an SK mindset. I will go into further detail when it becomes applicable on Day 2. Stim isn't even in his proposed scumteam. Tofu, can you clarify this situation? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 27 2013 01:29 hzflank wrote: Chrom, is there anyone besides Spicy whose actions around the lynch seemed scummy? On June 26 2013 11:59 Chromatically wrote: I think that Onegu comes off worst after this lynch. He blatantly didn't care about whether Aqua or Xzav was lynched: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 02:23 Onegu wrote: On June 26 2013 02:22 Chromatically wrote: You don't care who is killed? Between xzavier and Aqua. Except just a few posts earlier, he says that he has a null read on Xzav and a scum read on Aqua: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 02:19 Onegu wrote: On June 26 2013 02:01 FirmTofu wrote: Even now, it is still possible that Xzavier lives because we only have 5 votes. We should try convincing hzflank or Alakaslam to switch their votes. As I suspect the Mafia team is as follows... Xzavier SpicyDinosaur Onegu They are trying not to make it obvious that they want to keep Xzavier alive. You can see how they are frantically looking for other scapegoats to shift attention off of Xzavier, but don't have much of a case. Furthermore, my preliminary assessment of Alakaslam speaks to an SK mindset. I will go into further detail when it becomes applicable on Day 2. To be honest I dont care who is killed if Xzavier flips town my vote will go on aquanim and if he flips scum I will vote Spicydinosaur. My current read on Xzavier is null with scum reads on alakaslam and aqua. With every post Alakaslam makes he looks more and more like noob scum to me. So he doesn't care about the lynch, even though he thinks that Aqua is scummier. Why wouldn't he vote Aqua, and why doesn't a townie care about the lynch in the first place? If Onegu was scum, however, he wouldn't care whether Aqua or Xzav are lynched as he knows that they're both town. He also wouldn't want to have his vote on one of them when they flipped because it would draw suspicion to himself. Side note: this works just as well if Aqua is scum. Onegu wouldn't want to vote Aqua because they're scumbuddies and doesn't want to be on the mislynch wagon. Thoughts? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 27 2013 01:54 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 06:36 Chromatically wrote: It helps that I have a town read on everyone on the Xzav wagon, so I really don't think that scum is pushing this wagon at all. I'd be surprised if there are no scum at all on a town wagon. Before the flip you suspected Onegu for the reasoning behind his voting. While the flip does not change his reasoning, I expected it to cause you to reconsider more. Although Meow was the first to vote for Xzavier, with the way it happened I consider you to be the starter of the Xzavier wagon. Therefore, your insight into the votes that your wagon gathered will be very useful. There is no rush, we have 48 hours, but I was just surprised that you started with Onegu and Spicy. I don't know where you're going with these. Not caring about the lynch looks bad no matter what the flip is, that's what I said before the flip. Now that we know both wagons were likely town, there is clear scum motivation to not vote for either. I've stated my reasoning about why Aqua and Spicy look bad, do you disagree? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 27 2013 03:18 Onegu wrote: Show nested quote + On June 27 2013 03:04 Hurricane Sponge wrote: On June 27 2013 02:59 Onegu wrote: I had no qualms about voteing aqua and was planning on voteing him today until the firmtofu case came up. As I said it didnt matter to me who was killed because I had a scum read on Aqua and a null read on xzavier but depending on how he fliped would focus my day 2 targets, I have said all along I want to lynch Aqua and still do. I cannot make a good case on him but I am trying and keep looking things over. But saying I didnt vote him because I am scum buddies is dumb, If not tofu today and it is between anyone and aqua my vote will go on aqua. But at this point firmtofu I can make a much stronger case on him. I don't think you're scumbuddies. I think Aqua is town. I'm confused by your actions. If I saw two wagons forming, one on a Townie and one on someone I thought was Scum, I'd get on that Scum bandwagon no matter what it looked like to make sure the right man dies. I can say this with confidence because it's exactly what I did. If you were town, that's the behavior I'd expect. I could see how maybe if you thought both xzavier and aqua were town or both were scum you could justify your apathy. But having different reads on the two main wagons, and just letting them roll by you baffles me. In a bad way. I only had slightly different reads it would not have supprised me if xzavier flipped scum, and it didnt suprise me he flipped town. That being said if I had a town read on him what you say is correct and I would have put my vote back on aqua. As it was I put my vote on my best case made a good case for him and when I was going to sleep 8 hours before the deadline it didnt matter much to me who was killed, and it was also possible people would have read my arguement and voted alakaslam also. The problem where I stay is I am usally not up for the deadline so I have to make a vote and decision well in advance of everyone else. This part still doesn't make sense. If you have to place your vote ahead of time, then you can't push your preferred wagon at all. There was a near 0% chance that Alaka gets lynched as you sleep. The only move that makes sense if you can't be around for deadline is to put your vote on the wagon who is scummiest. Even now, you think that Aqua is really scummy. Why didn't you put your vote on him? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 27 2013 03:25 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 27 2013 03:16 Chromatically wrote: On June 27 2013 01:54 hzflank wrote: On June 26 2013 06:36 Chromatically wrote: It helps that I have a town read on everyone on the Xzav wagon, so I really don't think that scum is pushing this wagon at all. I'd be surprised if there are no scum at all on a town wagon. Before the flip you suspected Onegu for the reasoning behind his voting. While the flip does not change his reasoning, I expected it to cause you to reconsider more. Although Meow was the first to vote for Xzavier, with the way it happened I consider you to be the starter of the Xzavier wagon. Therefore, your insight into the votes that your wagon gathered will be very useful. There is no rush, we have 48 hours, but I was just surprised that you started with Onegu and Spicy. I don't know where you're going with these. Not caring about the lynch looks bad no matter what the flip is, that's what I said before the flip. Now that we know both wagons were likely town, there is clear scum motivation to not vote for either. I've stated my reasoning about why Aqua and Spicy look bad, do you disagree? Did anyone actually care about the lynch? Sure, you and Tofo pushed hard to get people onboard when it was tight between Xz and Aqua but as soon as Xz was highly likely to be lynched everyone stopped caring. People who were not on the wagon jumped on. People who were on the wagon discussed moving there vote. Not to mention that we currently have a better chance working out which passenger was scum than we do of working out which non-passenger was scum. Your case on Onegu is severely hampered by all the other talk about Onegu being scummy. If you were scum, which you very well might be, then the obvious move was to pressure Onegu once Xz flipped green. There was loads of preparation done for this move pre-flip, when most of us did not even know that xZ would flip green. On June 27 2013 03:25 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Show nested quote + On June 27 2013 03:24 FirmTofu wrote: hzflank, you keep repeating that someone on the wagon must be scum. Why do you believe that is the case? Does it necessarily have to be true, or do you think you are assuming it should be true because Xzavier flipped town? Because if everyone on the Xzavier wagon was town, then the mafia team is Onegu, Spicy and Stim. What are both of you talking about? We don't know whether there was 0, 1, 2, 3 scum on the wagon. For all I know, the team could be Onegu/Spicy/Stim. The full team doesn't matter now anyway. hz, I have no idea what you mean by the bold. There are a lot of good reasons why Onegu is scummy. We're still just trying to find scum. I'm looking at who looks worst from the flip. I'm not going to ignore people off the wagon because you think, for some reason, that they're less likely to be scum. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 27 2013 03:40 hzflank wrote: My problem is that Chromatically, Tofu and Hurricane have not pressured each other since the flip. The flip made you all look guilty for different reasons. I expected you to defend yourselves by investigating each other. You are better placed to investigate each other than I am, because you know if you are town. The best way for the town to get a correct read on which of you is scum (if any) is if you look for guilt in each other. Why don't you explain how the flip made each of us look bad? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 27 2013 03:50 hzflank wrote: Show nested quote + On June 27 2013 03:43 Chromatically wrote: On June 27 2013 03:40 hzflank wrote: My problem is that Chromatically, Tofu and Hurricane have not pressured each other since the flip. The flip made you all look guilty for different reasons. I expected you to defend yourselves by investigating each other. You are better placed to investigate each other than I am, because you know if you are town. The best way for the town to get a correct read on which of you is scum (if any) is if you look for guilt in each other. Why don't you explain how the flip made each of us look bad? Why don't you do some scum hunting? Really? I've clearly explained why I think that Onegu looks the worst from the lynch. I also don't like how Spicy looks, which I've explained. I'm obviously not going to waste time pressuring people who I think are town. If you think that we look bad, it's your job to do the pressuring. I don't think that either of them look bad. So why don't you do some scum hunting? | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
There's no way for town to tell if you're a lying townie or scum who's trying to cover up a mistake. I will be sorely, sorely tempted to policy lynch you if you lie again. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
The Tofu lying thing bothers me a bit, but I'm willing to overlook it on account of a) the fact that his explanation holds together and b) the sheer amount of TOWN in his filter. I think that these reads should be pretty obvious to anyone who looks through their filters. The mindset that their posts come from is clearly town. Spicy, hz, Aqua, and Alaka (in rough order of decreasing town) are all unlikely scum. I'm almost certainly wrong on at least one of them, but I have no idea who. Spicy in particular might look wierd here, as I was on him for his voting, but his Xzav read looks genuine if you look at his filter. He has several reasons for not voting Xzav, and he sticks to those reasons in the face of aggression from the town. It would have been very possible for scum Spicy to avoid drawing attention here by simply giving in, but he sticks to his read. He even backs down from one of his points when I argue him on it, but still explains why he has the read. That's very town to me + Show Spoiler + On June 26 2013 00:38 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 26 2013 00:25 Chromatically wrote: Spicy It's one thing to be more cautious after a game, it's another to not scumhunt at all. If he were a truly panicked scum i would think he would listen to everyone and start making cases, not go crazy. The whole "If Xzav were scum, he would do x" argument is WIFOM. Maybe he would do that as scum. Maybe he's not and he's trying to trick us. Maybe he's not doing it anyway because he doesn't know how to. He might not be making cases because it's hard to scumhunt as scum. He might not be making cases so people think that it's a "genuine townie reaction". He might not be making cases so that you make the exact argument you're making now. There are a number of reasons why he would react the way he has, and it doesn't make him townier at all. That sort of argument is what makes up most of his defense and now your defense of him, which is why I found his defense thoroughly unconvincing. Fair point the on WIFOM. For me it just comes down to the fact that i dont see this as a scum xzavier given his last game play and self reflection afterwards with his bad reads. I just don't buy a scum xzavier not having some type of read or questions about cases out by the time of the vote. The rest of his filter is townie, as I've said before. He has active conversations with the thread, his reads change in genuine ways, and he doesn't really look to be blending in. In particular, the shitfight with Tofu isn't something that scum would want to get into. It puts the spotlight on Spicy, but he kept up with his logic the whole time and didn't resort to emotional attacks or backing down and sulking away. hz has been making some wierd and nonsensical arguments, but he's active in the thread and feels genuine and townie (in addition to what I've said in the past). Alaka has been posting a lot of nonsense. This gives me town feels because he is not being careful AT ALL. He's done the opposite of blending in, he's drawn so much attention to himself that I can't believe a scum would willingly do. He's been asking for people to vote him off, which is pretty risky to do as scum because it's so frowned upon. All of this makes me really think that he is just town that has an extremely odd way of playing the game. The reason that he's so low on this list is that it's possible that he's actually SCUM with a really wierd way of playing the game. Stim and Meow (in order of decreasing town) are likely scum. I was thinking that Meow was town day 1, but a reread of him makes this less likely for a few reasons. First, he's pretty much the definition of "blending in". He posts the bare minimum so that he's not noticed, and it's been working very well. Compared to Stim, Meow has been virtually unnoticed (partially my fault, I know). His reads completely echo town sentiment. What I saw as "looking for scum" earlier really is just him asking some random questions in one post and never following up on them. He's also been completely absent post-lynch and for this whole night phase. I'll continue on this in a separate post. Onegu is probably scum. I (and Tofu) have already said why. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 24 2013 14:43 LoneMeow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 12:30 FirmTofu wrote: Quoted Player List for reference: On June 18 2013 14:22 geript wrote: The Players
We still have yet to hear from Onegu, fyfy, Alakaslam, and LoneMeow. There's this thing called timezones - it's now 07:43 in my current local time... Regarding to claiming, I'd like to ask that nobody claims. Day 1 claiming is generally not a great idea. Show nested quote + On June 24 2013 13:29 Chromatically wrote: On June 24 2013 13:12 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Chromatically, do you have any scumreads? Right now, I'm looking at Xzavier and hzflank. Both have posted a bit, but neither have been scumhunting. hz's recent post makes me feel a little better, but it did only come when I specifically asked him and I don't really agree with it. That doesn't necessarily make him scum though. There are also some other small things that bother me, but I'll elaborate on those later. I'd like to note that largely with the exception of this post, you haven't done much scumhunting yourself. Would you care to elaborate on those small things for me? I do agree about Xzavier feeling scummy though. It first felt like a bit of meta case, as I remember him being very actively townie during day 1 in our last game, but reading through what he's said so far he hasn't really done any hunting so it seems objectively scummy, too. This post seems like Meow really doesn't want to rock the boat at all and draw attention to himself. He pressures me in the most non-confrontational possible way, and then agrees with me on Xzavier. He doesn't offer any original opinions (or any other opinions at all). This is a theme throughout his posting. On June 25 2013 07:05 LoneMeow wrote: Xzavier, I still don't like your filter. Practically just setup speculation, no scum hunting or reads. I want to lynch you. I'm not all that comfortable with lynching hzflank, in fact I'd rather not. I read him as town-ish. StiMaDDict, start participating in some way. Who's your top scum read, why? fyfy, you say you'd "rather lynch someone scummier", tell me who'd that be? ##Vote: Xzavier This vote has very, very little reasoning behind it. Xzav happened to be, even at this point, the closest thing that town had to a consensus on a scumread. I had started pressuring hz right before this post, so Meow calls him town (leaving wiggle room, of course) because that was what everyone besides me was saying. He doesn't offer a single original opinion here. He doesn't offer any opinions at all, in fact, other than the ones that were widely agreed upon. He asks some questions to the other lurkers, but never follows up on them. This really shows that he's not actually interested in what they say. He's only doing it to look like he's interacting with the town. On June 25 2013 23:48 LoneMeow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 23:11 Spicydinosaur wrote: I'm not liking Xzavier as a D1 lynch but i see why others are voting him. Before chrom threw a vote down on him he did 0 scum hunting and his posts were just policy and/or fluff. With that i can clearly see a vote. However what he has done since the votes started piling on has convinced me he's town. An unproductive town before the vote, but a townie no less. Have you looked at it from the perspective that he might be scum that panicked once he had votes on him and only then started doing something to look more towny? Even now his filter is "plenty of posts, little content", which I find very troublesome, though it I admit I don't feel as sure about this lynch as I did earlier. Also I see that some of my town reads are not on his case or are defending him, which is worrying. This is posted when the Xzav lynch is uncertain (only Meow, me, and Aqua onboard). Several people were defending Xzav at this point. Meow makes sure to leave an out, so that way he can switch off easily if need be ("I wasn't as sure and my town reads were defending him"). On June 26 2013 01:10 LoneMeow wrote: Stim lynch with the info we have right now would be too much of a coin flip I think, however if he doesn't come back and elaborate as he promised I am ready to see him hang. And unless something truly game changing happens my vote will be on Xzavier or Stim - definitely not Aquanim. Right as the case on Stim is posted, and a Stim wagon is a very real possibility, Meow comes in and says that he'd be willing to switch. Notice how he's continually leaving his options open: he has an excuse to either stay on Xzav or switch to Stim if necessary. Both of these reads are carbon copies of the town sentiment. That's almost all of his posts. Remember how he just said that he'd switch to Stim if he never came back? Didn't happen. Meow never mentions Stim again after this, because the wagon on Stim doesn't happen. Literally every read that he has is exactly what the town is thinking. He doesn't offer his own opinion on anyone besides the centers of attention, Xzav/Stim (and a little hz). He also leaves his options wide open just in case he needs to move. He posts just enough so that he's seen as the most town of the lurkers, but that's exactly what scum would do as a lurker. Meow has been blending in and not drawing attention to the max, the ESSENTIAL characteristic of scum play. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On June 27 2013 10:23 Aquanim wrote: @Chromatically: What makes you think that "mostly agrees with you, but doesn't have time to fully flesh out his ideas and make his own thread impact" isn't a reasonable explanation for LoneMeow's play to date? Also, I think Spicy would have looked a LOT worse if he'd backflipped on his Xzavier read. In fact I can't see any reason why he'd vote Xzavier if he was scum. In theory, there's a somewhat plausible town explanation for every scum action. That doesn't mean that it's likely. I think that Meow has been trying to stay under the radar too much to by town (by completely sheeping town sentiment and leaving his lynch options open). I disagree with most of your reasoning on Spicy. First of all, I'm not looking at his meta. According to Xzav's meta, he was scum. I could make an argument that you're scum based on meta, because you're not as much of a town leader that you were in XXXIII. You could make a meta argument that I'm scum because I haven't used associations and I opened differently. Meta is not useful in newbie games. His stance on Xzav wasn't wishy-washy at all, it was that Xzav was town. He believed this enough to argue it against me, and logically stand his ground. Spicy might have looked worse if he had switched to Xzav, but if you read his reasoning, there's no reason to think that it's fake because it looks very genuine. I'm surprised that you see nothing townie in his filter. Look at the giant fight he had with Tofu, look at how he interacts with me about my cases and his cases. I think he's town. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
Like the Kenpachi rule. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
July 05 2013 20:39 GMT
#1887
It sounds like analysis is coming, but if anyone has advice on how to improve, I would really love to hear it. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
July 05 2013 20:49 GMT
#1891
"You have to remember that scum have a tracker" ==> "You have to remember that scum could have a tracker" and the rest of his point works just as well. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
July 05 2013 21:16 GMT
#1909
On July 06 2013 05:55 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On July 06 2013 05:49 Chromatically wrote: I still think that "scumslip" could just as easily be a miswording from a townie. "You have to remember that scum have a tracker" ==> "You have to remember that scum could have a tracker" and the rest of his point works just as well. yeah except it was a proper slip. it COULD have been a miswording, but likelihood is that it isn't, probably. Further it wasn't the only time on day 1 he slipped something like that. Once it happens twice... well, yeah ^^ It happened twice? Totally missed that :/ I was thinking of a scumslip as "instalynch gg no filterreading needed", but scumslips are just more evidence, not proof (right?). I ignored it when I read it because it could have come from town, but I never brought it up later when I was suspicious of Onegu because I had crossed it off as invalid in my mind. | ||
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
July 06 2013 03:10 GMT
#1935
On June 24 2013 11:04 Chromatically wrote: Why so scummy, Spicy? | ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2![]() ![]() Jaedong ![]() PianO ![]() Mini ![]() GuemChi ![]() Stork ![]() Last ![]() JulyZerg ![]() ZerO ![]() Rush ![]() [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War League of Legends |
OSC
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
Maru vs TriGGeR
Rogue vs NightMare
The PondCast
Replay Cast
OSC
Online Event
SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Invitational
[ Show More ] SC Evo League
WardiTV Invitational
Chat StarLeague
PassionCraft
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Chat StarLeague
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Wardi Open
PiGosaur Monday
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
|
|