I Swear This Is Normal Mini Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 09 2013 13:30 AxleGreaser wrote: Not until I know your alignment and probably/possibly/maybe what the powers restrictions are or even know who will know what about them when. In the absence of all knowledge, I already chose the optimal course. Even then there may be other candidates I'd prefer based on capability generating a better risk benefit tradeoff. If I had enough information I might even prefer a candidate other than me. We are getting late enough in the day now that experience tells me, that other tzs likely wont be checking in. hence we lose a fraction of the day do you have suggestion of what we can do profitably? AFAIK 1v1 mafia doesn't work that well. aka speak words now. Pretty sure you can tell from my track record that I really only roll non-VT when I force myself into a themed game ![]() Also, we won't know what these powers/restrictions are until the election is over so there's no real point trying to work it out. In which case everyone ends up voting themselves as the 'optimal' route? We have quite a few people in for discussion now, but what is there to discuss at the moment.. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 09 2013 14:32 Hapahauli wrote: @ Sylencia Why do you want to be elected mayor? I like it when people run campaigns, but I detest joke campaigns. Obviously none of this is remotely sufficient rationale to vote for you. Hard for me to tell what you consider a serious campaign vs a joke campaign. Does someone who does a post like ShiaoPi's count as a serious campaign or not? If so, it's hard for me to take your vote for mayor seriously. In all honesty, I'm not going to push for myself to be the mayor, I haven't had enough experience to really know how to use these roles well and it'd be more suited to another. On June 09 2013 14:33 AxleGreaser wrote: >We have quite a few people in for discussion now, but what is there to discuss at the moment.. We grasp at straws. I already voted Oats because ... Now when I say: > Not until I know your alignment and probably/possibly/maybe what the powers restrictions are or even know who will > know what about them when. In the absence of all knowledge, I already chose the optimal course. Which mentions both determining alignments and setup speculation Sylencia: < "Also, we won't know what these powers/restrictions are until the election is over so there's no real point trying to < work it out. In which case everyone ends up voting themselves as the 'optimal' route?" Which seems to have overlooked finding out alignments, the important bit. If you already knew them that would explain that assumption. That's what I do. Now I see what you do. Also do remember, while we do this, to notice what other people are not doing. Are you saying we're working out alignments to ensure we've got a Town Mayor? I thought that was a given. On June 09 2013 14:46 ShiaoPi wrote: @Sylencia: Where did you went off to? More than enough to discuss here! (Also cookies if you do the right thing!) Went off to stream dota <.< In terms of mayor voting, I'll hold off for now. On June 09 2013 15:00 Hapahauli wrote: ##Lynch VayneAuthority Was this vote purely because he mayor voted for someone you didn't want to be mayor? You've mentioned having a mayor vote on someone who isn't seriously running for it to be bad, but does that make him scum? I'd like to see the link in reasoning for that. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 09 2013 15:22 ShiaoPi wrote: I am intersted in getting sylencia back here right now. What is your stance on my campaign? I'm pretty neutral about it, you're the only one who's really put up their hand for being mayor (I have but semi-in jest, and I'm not sure if Axle's is serious or not). Would you say you're the best fit for mayor even if everyone else wanted to be mayor too? | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 09 2013 23:09 Oatsmaster wrote: I mean, this is the reason Vayne's vote Yeah thats a vote that isnt on Shiao for the sake of it. So he doesnt appear too sheepy or compliant of whatever. Not cause he thinks you are a better mayor. Bad. Everyone who's put a mayor vote on Shiao looks super sheepy anyways, why would that matter if he sheeped onto the Shiao vote? On June 09 2013 23:26 ShiaoPi wrote: I am the best fit for mayor, since I am giving out cookies. In all seriousness, I say I am best fit for mayor simply because I know that I am town. Rest is of course unsure. Since I do want double vote and whatever other power the mayor gets to be in good hands, I think yes, I am the best fit. @Oats: Since I am cool, vote me! You can even get a oatmeal cookie if you want one. Great reasoning. . . . .. .. . .. . .. . . On June 10 2013 00:51 Oatsmaster wrote: If you dont think he is scum, why are you against him being mayor?? ??? Maybe stutters is too shy to say he wants mayor :D | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 10 2013 02:53 Hapahauli wrote: @ Sylencia and Stutters Since you're both hesitant about Shaio's candidacy, some questions: 1) What qualities would you consider "ideal" mayoral qualities? 2) If you were to pick anyone in this town to run (regardless of if they want to run or not), who would you vote based on the thread so far? 1) Someone who has decent reasoning. The primary area where this should be shown is the reasoning in why they should be leader. Shiao's reasoning is not a reason to be mayor ("I know I'm town and I want double vote, so I want mayor"), and that's why I don't really fancy the idea of voting him for mayor. 2) I would've said Oats - he's brought up similar issues with Vayne that you did, but he explained it in a more reasonable manner and came off as being a lot less hostile than how you handled it. Two "serious" mayor candidates have come out since that post though - Hapa's one is the kind of reasoning I was looking for, and Gravity's counter-candidate speech is interesting but I can't take it that seriously -_-;; On June 10 2013 11:37 VayneAuthority wrote: there's no contradiction here. Posting like this makes scum keep me alive so I can continue playing the game, while being mayor would make them want to kill me more. also not that I think axlegreaser is scum, I meant more that I do not trust him to be mayor as I can't understand half his posts so it wouldn't be in my best interest. If you're posting with survival in mind, it's a pretty bad mindset to be in - especially so early on. Since the way you're explaining it makes it sound like you're acting slightly scummy just to be off the NK radar. You and GravityMan discuss this after this post so I won't bother with it further but pretty sure it's better you get killed Night 1 and provide a lot of information town can use rather than nothing at all and getting endgamed (I'm guilty of this quite often.. though I just get lynched half way anyways) On June 10 2013 12:48 VayneAuthority wrote: I can't reveal everything about my play or scum will be able to hide too easily, let's just say it has a purpose though I don't even understand what this post means? What could you possibly be hiding that could make things EASIER for scum? | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 10 2013 23:29 Oatsmaster wrote: And the fact that he KEEPS saying that he is town, check his meta, bla bla. I don't think it's a tell when people do that - I tried calling rayn out in LXI for that and he was town in the end iirc. I'm more up for lynching Vayne today though - his apparent reasoning for his weird posts, which is for survival (but in a sense that the posts are scummy enough that scum have a reason to keep him alive) is a pretty weak reason and having some sort of hidden agenda behind his play? If he had a hidden agenda, why would be tell us so? If it's something to use in the future to find scum, well now they're more wary and more likely to target Vayne, which is the exact opposite of what he wanted to do (survive). ##Vote Vayne | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
![]() ##unvote is the obvious first move GravityMan: On June 11 2013 01:14 GravityMan wrote: Sylencia. Hello. If you are not currently otherwise occupied, I have some queries for you that I feel would help me gain a better understand of you. If you would answer them I would be greatly pleased. Do you have any reads on scum other than this VayneAuthority? What do you make of the altercation between the Oatsmaster and this Blazinghand? You mention that you are often lynched early in other games. Why is this? 1) No, not really, everyone is acting really erratically this game and it's making things kind of difficult to work out. 2) That argument was actually rather annoying - flamefests just spam up the thread uselessly and demoralises the town side most of the time. I don't even feel like there was anything productive that came from it... 3) Lurkerish, lynchbait, scum jump on my weak cases etc. etc. Unless Jampi shows up soon (he said he would be here around now right?), I'm going to put a vote on him going mostly on Hapa's reasoning. ##vote Jampi | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 11 2013 10:58 jampidampi wrote: I can get behind that for self preservation You're backing someone who you were finding suspicious yesterday, what makes him null now (according to your list) | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
Here is what I meant about erratic behaviour: - BH starts out the game lurker style but then comes out guns blazing against Oats in a flamefest war which I frankly don't understand the point of. Neither of them really got their point to each other. - Hapa attacks Vayne then goes 'nah all cool' and moves on like nothing happened. Vayne is pretty much confirmed town at this point, but at the time when it happened I had no idea what to make of it. - Stutter's lurkiness is similar to LXI, hard to make out anything from it - this is probably the most normal thing about this town during D1. - Vayne goes scum style posting into blue claim, weirdest play to date (I missed the hints, but apparently everyone did) - Axle is actually making sense for once, which is the weirdest thing unless I haven't played with him long enough for him to be more normal like this? - I don't think I've played a game with Hapa before, but he's probably the most level headed player in this group from what I've seen. None of this actually really helps in the end with scumhunting, but it just threw me off guard to see these changes. For tonight, about the potential shot, probably best not to use it if you're not sure Hapa. If things go wrong and we're looking at an SK or something in the mix, town numbers could be at an all time low in just 1 day/night cycle. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 12 2013 01:12 VayneAuthority wrote: it's not very weird at all scummy posting doesnt get you night killed so i usually make good use of blue roles. the circumstances and such a fast bandwagon from a group of lurkers made this not possible. How does it help when you force yourself to claim to survive? Blue roles have no power if they are dead before they get results. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 12 2013 01:18 VayneAuthority wrote: yea because i really wanted to claim...This happened because town like jampi just jumped into the thread and didnt read shit and bandwagoned. if you want to blame me for half the game lurking and forcing me to claim then fine. Alternatively you can avoid this completely by just being town in the first place and thus having 0 votes on you - magic, no need to claim. @Oats: If GK doesn't have anything in the next 24 hours, I'd be willing to put money on a lurker scum team - something like him + stutters (maybe +1 if there's a third). The only one that sticks out is Blazinghand for causing chaos for no reason but idk if that's his playstyle - please fill me in there. Reasoning is everything has run too smoothly and there haven't felt like there have been any sort of misdirections so far. We had a blue claim on day 1, so having some sort of mayor takeover would be a pretty good idea in Day 1 for scum to take, as they can reliably target Vayne with no consequence. If he dies, he dies. If he doesn't, everyone just says someone protected him, and no one suspects the mayor. None of this happened, so unless Hapa is scum, everyone active seems town. Any problem with my reasoning? | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 12 2013 01:26 VayneAuthority wrote: yes next game i will just never post, that seems to be how to be town in this game Can you not think of the game in terms of your own self preservation and about how to actually benefit town in the case you get mislynched? Getting killed/mislynched but providing town vital information at death isn't necessarily fun for you, but you would actually be trying to go towards the goal of finding all scum and eliminating them. Is that not better than reaching all the way down to 3 man mafia and having no information at all because everyone's playing for self preservation thus so much information is withheld until that point? Anyways, I'm done for the night, I'll be back before the deadline though. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
![]() | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
![]() | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
gg hapa Anyways, I'm interested in ShiaoPi's reads atm, as I said Stutters post is pretty good and so I'm willing to go with that for now. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 12 2013 11:24 VayneAuthority wrote: btw if BH needlessly tries to start an argument again ill probably shoot him due to his spammy/useless playstyle as scum. He keeps trying to drive away reason in favor of bitchfights #OneManHoldsAllThePowers Don't shoot randomly thanks. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 12 2013 16:47 goodkarma wrote: I said you were flying under the radar, and that when you are here you seem to be content to agree with a stance here and there and not really add anything. It's not about your "lurkiness," but what you aren't doing when you are here. I'm assuming from what Vayne has said he plans to use his vig shot today. Therefore, we need to determine two scum candidates for this cycle. None of this really is that difficult to understand. While you're here, would you mind providing an opinion on anything? Or more specifically, perhaps elaborate on your top scumread? If Vayne wants to use it as a shot, why aren't we lynching a top suspect first, and shooting during the night? Unless there's some sort of claim that can only be checked by death, I don't see a reason why it should be rushed so. (I'm not reading the power wrong, right?) My top read at the time you posted was ShiaoPi, as I said I agreed with a lot of the points made by Stutters. I made that clear end of last night. I haven't fully digested ShiaoPi's response yet, but if I'm wrong on that account, my previous statement feels good: On June 12 2013 01:24 Sylencia wrote: @Oats: If GK doesn't have anything in the next 24 hours, I'd be willing to put money on a lurker scum team - something like him + stutters (maybe +1 if there's a third). The only one that sticks out is Blazinghand for causing chaos for no reason but idk if that's his playstyle - please fill me in there. Reasoning is everything has run too smoothly and there haven't felt like there have been any sort of misdirections so far. We had a blue claim on day 1, so having some sort of mayor takeover would be a pretty good idea in Day 1 for scum to take, as they can reliably target Vayne with no consequence. If he dies, he dies. If he doesn't, everyone just says someone protected him, and no one suspects the mayor. None of this happened, so unless Hapa is scum, everyone active seems town. Any problem with my reasoning? For catching up, only having an analysis of 4 players (2 of which seem like afterthoughts), and a weak scumread based a lot on meta is pretty bad. I've heard from BH enough that you have slow starts, but idk define slow start, how long is it going to take to get the ball rolling, and out of all the players how is it that you've got thoughts on 2 lurky players over someone with a lot more points to consider such as Grav/WoS and Oats? About GravityMan - I am also missing what is obvious about him that makes him scum according to BH, but the only point i"ll take from it is that he is the only one who disrupted Hapa's mayoral campaign with a sort of smear campaign against him. You can make reasons for why he did it if he's scum (potentially take power, and make hapa a suspect), but since that failed, would scum have chosen Hapa as the target of the NK over Vayne to clearly show that? Food for thought, seeing as that was the only real 'major' event that happened regarding mayoral campaigns. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 13 2013 09:07 goodkarma wrote: Catching up with the thread now. The first thing I'd like to address is this Syl post: First of all, the entire point of mentioning a good vigishot for Vayne is we should be treating this cycle like a doublelynch, as Hapa originally suggested. Even if Vayne opts to wait until the night to shoot, by discussing this now we have that much more information to go on in later cycles. For that reason, everyone should be doing this. So you can't be bothered to review the latest posting of your top scumread, and you fall back on proposing a lurker scumteam if your top read convinces you he's town??? Explain to me how that isn't scum-motivated behavior? Further, I provided a read on Grav in the post you're referencing, so it's clear you aren't reading the thread very closely. This is the kind of disinterest I'd expect from scum. I still believe you'd be a good vigi shot. The fact I can actually rely on something which I believed to have been true from the night before shows the actual lack of contribution that you had brought to the table to this point. If I say you're scummy during N1, and you do nothing to change that view in D2, you're saying it's scum oriented for me to say I still think you're scum? Also yes, turns out I ended up thinking you did an analysis on GK which is yourself (it made perfect sense at the time somehow -_-). In any case: - Axle: How has this guy been able to fly under the radar this entire game? As far as I've read there's been very little suspicious cast on him, he's been questioned about his reads in which he's tip toed around the problem: On June 13 2013 08:23 AxleGreaser wrote: There is the obvious list, of people who have not contributed much. There is the obvious list of turning Hapas list upside down and saying that. One thing i dont want to do is get all in a low post count townies face, and shut them down. So I wont be doing that. The least clear intention I have is you. I see what "looks" like a tendency to Lynch BH for being BH. I see posts that could well inflame him and make his ego come to the fore as town or scum. This could have been their intention, or not. It alludes to him suspecting GM (pretty much confirmed to be saying he suspects GM next post), but he doesn't push it at all. He said he doesn't want to shut a lurker down, but GM is far from a lurker, so why wouldn't he push a case there? If there's someone in this game who is a prime example of being neutral on pretty much everything, it's Axle. BH has been doing a lot of talking without a lot of pushing, but I'm pretty sure that Axle is a better option over BH. After a slow first half of Day 1, I think if BH was scum he'd easily adapt into a less active role in the game. He brings up points I don't think anyone else would be doing otherwise (possible VA fakeclaim etc.) and just by doing that I feel it's enough to justify keeping him around for longer. Without BH this town will be a dead town, with little to no deviation in thoughts. GK I'm still willing to put my vote on him, idk how slow a start can be, but even his vote on BH didn't have any substance to it. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
@Shiao: Stutters is fine, his end of n1/d2 play has been pretty solid. I'm pretty null on you though. @Oats, what are you thoughts on Axle, and why not push GK more rather than switching to GM? I feel more towards voting for GK than GM personally | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 13 2013 23:04 Oatsmaster wrote: Im talking to GK about lynching someone today. He wouldnt want to lynch himself right? I want GK to die. But no one seems to be interested ![]() Axle has been way more relevent than in the one scum game Ive played with him and he has been almost the most active person in the game with occasional good insights. Im not lynching him ever. Oh right, and idk, does Blazinghand not take the most active award with occasional good insights? | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
As for you, why were you so hesistant to just outright say who you suspected when asked, it looks suspicious on your part because there's no reason to dodge as town, despite what you said about not wanting the quieter members to be quiet. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 14 2013 00:38 GravityMan wrote: This is terrible honestly. Axle seems like the towniest town that ever towned, and this case misrepresents him entirely. I'm not sure why people are letting this go. He votes him based on the fact that Axle has been flying under the radar, and that he supposedly calls me a lurker? (hint: he's not referring to me) That's his entire reasoning. The whole thing in that one post. Why is Sylencia getting away with that exactly? I mean I'm not a fan of Axle right now because he's tunneled me for about half the game but at least he's doing it in a reasonable way' I don't see scum pushing a read like he has with the analysis that he's done, and I've played with scum Axle before. Now I have to get to Axle's case on me....sigh. I completely understand he wasn't referring to you. I explained that because the lurker statement was irrelevant to you, why would he have to hold back on unleashing any sort of case on you? You don't feel like he was holding back at all when he made that post? | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
Oatsmaster Blazinghand Stutters695 VayneAuthority GravityMan ShiaoPi AxleGreaser Goodkarma Town->scum order for me is some sort of rough order like this, a lot of them are close though. The fact Vayne is so damn low for a cop claim is pretty retarded though. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
Vayne should be higher, but man, honestly if you take away his cop claim I don't feel anything from him. Anyways I'm off for the night | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
As for what to add, I'm still sticking by BH being a bad lynch choice. | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
also told you guys | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
![]() | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
![]() | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
That said though, I do hope it's only a 2 man scum team since I want to believe Stutters is town (and a vig at that!) | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On June 14 2013 01:04 Sylencia wrote: Because it's fairly clear that I'm the only one who had thought of Axle that way pretty quickly. I'm still putting him in the possible scum pile though. Oatsmaster Blazinghand Stutters695 VayneAuthority GravityMan ShiaoPi AxleGreaser Goodkarma Town->scum order for me is some sort of rough order like this, a lot of them are close though. The fact Vayne is so damn low for a cop claim is pretty retarded though. I'll just leave this here cause I'm so mad right now, not even being town and I got everything correct at that stage -_____- | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
- GK was easy enough, a lurker calling out for a vig shot on another lurker raised alarm bells for me, and his activity never really improved that much. His case on BH was really weak and looked like it was a forced case - Axle because as I said he was asking all these questions but never really really did anything with it. He didn't ever really push a case on GM that hard when he said that he suspected it, he just kept asking questions. Apparently that was super townie though so I'll just say you guys are all crazy. - ShiaoPi was probably the one that was just based on eliminating the rest of town to figure out the last member. I had suspicions on him early on in the game, but I had pretty much pinned Oats, BH and stutters as town. I was a bit hesistant on Vayne, and I wasn't really seeing that much scumplay from GravMan | ||
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
| ||