EPTIf you want to kill me, whatever, I don't actually care about this game anymore. I'm with McGann on this. Barely anyone is reading, it's almost pointless to keep posting.
Smurf Mini Mafia - Page 37
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Let's play a game... | ||
|
TomB4
61 Posts
If you want to kill me, whatever, I don't actually care about this game anymore. I'm with McGann on this. Barely anyone is reading, it's almost pointless to keep posting. | ||
|
PTroughton2
82 Posts
On June 07 2013 08:03 SMcCoy wrote: What bothers me a lot is still the post with which HW joined the DrT bandwagon, since he kept himself the backdoor open to switch to Trout. If he was scum it was the obvious best choice for him to vote his scumbuddy first, and then switch when he'd have gotten any chance to. To be honest I'd rather lynch H3 and HW first, Tom at least will surely keep posting something we can go with. I apologize if I'm not very directional on this lynch but I detest that we have no vigi for the two and I would gladly use the lynch as such, they both are guilty of scummy things, they just don't have as many cause they keep their heads down on purpose. You believe that two of H3, HW, and Tom are scum, then? Like I mentioned earlier, H3 is on my radar for how he's been playing, or I guess I should say not playing this game so far. Tom fuck-it voted for HW, do you think he did this to reduce suspicion on HW after he flips and that he is scum together with HW so we could waste time going back and forth about it later after he flips? | ||
|
SMcCoy
228 Posts
Or post a case on Eccleston. He is your scumread and you martyr like that? Eccleston is right here, you can talk, talk to your scumread, isn't that cool? | ||
|
PTroughton2
82 Posts
On June 07 2013 08:07 TomB4 wrote: Why is HW getting a free pass? If you want to kill me, whatever, I don't actually care about this game anymore. I'm with McGann on this. Barely anyone is reading, it's almost pointless to keep posting. I haven't deeply read HW yet, although I did briefly discuss him after bringing up my earlier points in the game against H3. I'm more convinced of H3 than HW and you are voting for HW so I'm not sure what to make of that right now. There seems to be general consensus among those who are here that H3 needs to go, are you willing to vote for H3? | ||
|
SMcCoy
228 Posts
Here: Note that "there's a fair chance of DrT being scum". It's not saying he is scum, in case he flips town, this post only looks like a foolish guess. If he flips scum (which he did), then Eccleston can look like he successfully found a scum without actually having the conviction to go through with it. And the second half looks needlessly drawn out. He's assuming scum would post something about their scumbuddy for the case they flip town? Combine that with the way he portrayed Eccleston questioning H3 as soft-defense of DrT and you get the feeling that he's just flinging whatever could be construed as scummy. | ||
|
SMcCoy
228 Posts
Here's the post in question: On June 05 2013 11:30 HartnellWill wrote: Eccleston is now up to 17 posts from 14. Let's rattle off his updated posts (from Eccleston 2.0) that weren't in my original case: 1 post introducing himself, 1 post claiming he is potentially blue but definitely not red (what does this prove? anyone can make this claim), and 1 post saying he's catching up. So now let's look at the 14 again: The /in post written by GMarshal, nothing to see here. On to Posts 2-5: If he is scum, Eccleston wants people to discuss the setup straightaway in case the names weren't RNGed and there is some clue giving him away. Note that MS1 labelled him, Davison and H3 as scum. But this is innocent unto itself and I skimmed the first 8 pages of the thread. So this by itself is not indicative of anything + Show Spoiler + Or maybe the first 27. Who knows Next two posts attempt to generate setup discussion. And then MS1 called him out having just as much evidence to accuse someone of shenaniganry as MS1 himself. Normal D1 discussion seeds by any account. Post 6 has this gem: Note that "there's a fair chance of DrT being scum". It's not saying he is scum, in case he flips town, this post only looks like a foolish guess. If he flips scum (which he did), then Eccleston can look like he successfully found a scum without actually having the conviction to go through with it. And the second half looks needlessly drawn out. Next is 7, 8, and 13: His only solid read this game was PT2 and even then he flip flopped. There's no pressure involved in this read and the speculation doesn't serve to advance the game since by constantly redacting his case he's just spinning around in circles. Post 9 is simply a clarification of Post 8. 10-12 is accusing Hurn for sheeping PT2 and the friendly chat that follows: And after sheeping DrT in Post 13, he does this: Soft defense of the dude he's voting for. Something I wouldn't do unless I was foolishly trying to buy some street cred for my scumbuddy before he gets lynched. Time to /lurk  | ||
|
PTroughton2
82 Posts
On June 07 2013 08:19 SMcCoy wrote: I'd much rather have HW go first just for writing that thing about Eccleston. It really showed how he was trying to find ANY argument to use against him, regardless of the validity. Here: He's assuming scum would post something about their scumbuddy for the case they flip town? Combine that with the way he portrayed Eccleston questioning H3 as soft-defense of DrT and you get the feeling that he's just flinging whatever could be construed as scummy. Need to see if the troops are here to be rallied. I can see hints of HW posting for the sake of letting people know he's around, but not really doing anything constructive: On June 06 2013 10:09 HartnellWill wrote: Just got home, be right back On June 06 2013 10:29 HartnellWill wrote: I feel like Davison is more believable, given that Tom's defense wasn't too compelling. It's full of spite for someone accusing him of being scum, and it treats Eccleston and Eccleston 2.0 as polar opposites. Checking in, followed by making a single post that weighs in on on the current topic, and barely pushing for his main scum read to be lynched or discussing it with others whatsoever: On June 06 2013 04:42 HartnellWill wrote: Goddamn I would have no problem sheeping that TomB4 case. I still feel Eccleston is scum though. Maybe both are. Lynch one and shoot the other? On June 07 2013 05:26 HartnellWill wrote: I'm not pushing TD at all. Seems like TD 1.0 was just misunderstood. I believe TD 2.0. Ecc is not a mislynch. Ecc is scum. We should all vote for him. This seems to be a consistent theme with him, he even boldly claims in the thread that he is lurking and makes fun of himself with his "lurker den" comment. Hrm. And McCoy just quoted the post in question, which by virtue of being ridiculous for mafia to do, seems to be a tactic he uses to get town credit without assisting the town in discourse. | ||
|
TomB4
61 Posts
| ||
|
PTroughton2
82 Posts
On June 07 2013 08:51 TomB4 wrote: Isn't lynch in 2 hours? I'm leaving the house in 10 minutes, I won't be around for deadline. I don't know that 10 minutes is enough time to have a discussion but show me your points on HW and anyone else you can while you're here. | ||
|
SMcCoy
228 Posts
I wish we could activate triple-lynch. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Eccleston: (2)HartnellW, Baker, TomB4: (4)TheDavison, Eccleston, otherH, McCoy, Trought HartnellW: (1)TomB4 OtherH: (1)AdamMcGann Tom is set to be lynched. Day ends in 1 hour 20 minutes If there are errors in this votecount, pm me please | ||
|
TheDavison
157 Posts
ANd soon | ||
|
SMcCoy
228 Posts
| ||
|
TheDavison
157 Posts
Tom is my primary and has 5 votes. Why try to move elsewhere when we can obtain consolidation. FRankly I am not sold on hartnell. I think his case on eccle is easy to write as a tunneled townie. I am choosing to treat him as bad town. And I felt the points u raised against him arentn valid because as a townie I could picture myself making simlar connections he did in a tunneled state. There has already been analysis which showsnhe coild have affected the dr.t lynch. Instead he chose to sreengthen it. I refuse to believe scum bussed so early. So in that regard both tom and H3 fit the bill. Tom is vote leader so stick with him is my suggestion | ||
A McGann
81 Posts
Not interested in consolidating on toms. I'd rather no lynch than mislynch someone I believe to be town. | ||
|
TheDavison
157 Posts
What have you done this cycle to justify your high horse position. All I recall is OMGUS on me with zero analysis. If You are town you should be ensuring a lynch occurs. This game in general has too much driftwood/dead weight and we need to eradicate it. ALl tom does is create barriers to a lynch. But when it comes to pushing one he is very short on substance. Dead weight | ||
|
A McGann
81 Posts
I think he's town, therefore I'm not voting for him. | ||
|
TheDavison
157 Posts
BUt it is a high horse because you havent contributed anything significant this cycle and now have the power to derail any lynch from occuring. You are potentially the keystone to preventing a no lynch. And whilst i can respect that you tjink tom is town. I cant reconcile the lack of effort to produce a better alternative | ||
|
Eccleston
75 Posts
| ||
|
Eccleston
75 Posts
| ||
| ||
