On May 14 2013 03:06 s0Lstice wrote:
two steps forward, two steps back
two steps forward, two steps back

<3
/in
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 14 2013 03:06 s0Lstice wrote: two steps forward, two steps back ![]() <3 /in | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 15 2013 01:11 Promethelax wrote: I have only played 16 I think. You crazy! no u | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 17 2013 01:13 WaveofShadow wrote: God help me /confirm. tunnel-mode engaged <3 | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 17 2013 15:16 Ange777 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 17 2013 10:14 cDgCorazon wrote: Yeah that deadline is terrible for me. Any chance that gets changed? If not I doubt I can play. Depends on what kind of deadline would you need? A later one | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 17 2013 21:23 iamperfection wrote: Show nested quote + On May 17 2013 21:01 marvellosity wrote: The time is basically way too early because it doesn't allow Americans to get stuck in before deadline. brit overlord trying to speak for us Americans. Deadline doesn't bother me I thought it was more polite than saying 'yamato is a lazy shit who should learn what a morning is' ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 17 2013 23:00 iamperfection wrote: Show nested quote + On May 17 2013 22:59 marvellosity wrote: no, because the deadline will be changed, I guarantee it. why there have been only really one and 1/2 complaints. That's 1 1/2 more complaints than there are about shifting the deadline somewhat later ![]() edit: got ninjad by Prome. On May 17 2013 22:59 marvellosity wrote: the deadline will be changed, I guarantee it. On May 17 2013 23:00 iamperfection wrote: Show nested quote + On May 17 2013 22:59 marvellosity wrote: no, because the deadline will be changed, I guarantee it. why there have been only really one and 1/2 complaints. On May 17 2013 23:01 Promethelax wrote: Deadline will be changed. motherfucking marvellosity right here. *giggles* | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
00:00 GMT (+00:00) is perfect for me but I'm pretty flexible. There's no perfect time for asia + US + Europe, but Americans make up the large majority of the playerbase so realistically they need to be catered for the most | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 02:33 DarthPunk wrote: Iamp: I don't know who is scum the Game just started. WoS: Well I am totes town Iamp thanks for asking! Iamp: Let's be friends! WoS: RAINBOWS! Enter DP Dp: This is fucking retarded. Enter Marvellosity Marv: Don't listen to DP he is bad Entire Town: Sheep marv! THE END. I see that I don't really have to post for most of Day 1. Excellent. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
This does mean, however, that I'll still be outposting the large majority of you, so never fear. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 03:21 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 03:07 iamperfection wrote: alright im off to the gym you guys are boring me and bh is making me angry. back in a few hours how am i making you angry when you're the one shitting up the thread How is he doing that, dear? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 03:29 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 03:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 03:21 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 03:07 iamperfection wrote: alright im off to the gym you guys are boring me and bh is making me angry. back in a few hours how am i making you angry when you're the one shitting up the thread How is he doing that, dear? flaming Looks like typical iamp aggression to me, wouldn't you say? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 03:33 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 03:24 Spicydinosaur wrote: On May 18 2013 03:21 s0Lstice wrote: On May 18 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote: On May 18 2013 03:01 s0Lstice wrote: the fact that i've only ever played town is a pretty important piece of information to share for people who don't know me/haven't played with me. getting my share on, don't hate Maybe I'm reading to much into this but I'm wondering why you want people to focus on your meta? Let's say I tell you this is like my 13th game without rolling scum. What does that tell you about my play this game that you'd consider important at all right now? it's pretty simple dude....I just updated it last night so it's a brand new convenience for those who want to use it. that's all. You did not post it merely for people's convenience, you posted to specifically point out that you were always town. On May 18 2013 03:01 s0Lstice wrote: the fact that i've only ever played town is a pretty important piece of information to share for people who don't know me/haven't played with me. Oh wow actually, that is pretty interesting. I'm trying to think of the mindset of when I normally do it and I'm not sure if that would come from the same place or not. Solstice, what else do you think people should know about you for those who haven't played with you before? I feel obliged to say that you did almost the exact same thing in Ego mafia, and in a much more 'scummy' way, and you were town. Surely you should understand his mindset? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 03:35 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 03:31 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 03:29 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 03:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 03:21 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 03:07 iamperfection wrote: alright im off to the gym you guys are boring me and bh is making me angry. back in a few hours how am i making you angry when you're the one shitting up the thread How is he doing that, dear? flaming Looks like typical iamp aggression to me, wouldn't you say? nope Explain the difference then. I'm bored of how you're posting. ##Vote: BlazingHand | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 03:38 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 03:37 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 03:35 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 03:31 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 03:29 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 03:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 03:21 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 03:07 iamperfection wrote: alright im off to the gym you guys are boring me and bh is making me angry. back in a few hours how am i making you angry when you're the one shitting up the thread How is he doing that, dear? flaming Looks like typical iamp aggression to me, wouldn't you say? nope Explain the difference then. I'm bored of how you're posting. ##Vote: BlazingHand i wouldn't say because i don't know his meta. he's posting like dick, i vote him, he ragequits thread. are you voting me because of other factors here or just cause you're mad or do you think i'm scum I think you're posting like a douchebag, and usually when you post like a douchebag (say, The Game) you're mafia, and when you give me warm fuzzy feelings you're town. Currently I'm feeling the douchebag washing over me. You've also played with iamperfection multiple times (just off the top of my head, Rock Band, and Themed Game) so your excuse about not knowing his meta is extraordinarily bad. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
So what's your excuse for saying you don't know iamp's meta, despite having played with him multiple times? Go on, I'm listening. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() back later/tomorrow. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 05:07 Blazinghand wrote: just to be totally clear, Marv's so-called scum read on me is crap. Hus substantiating evidence is non evidence and he would never try to pull something like this as town. I am a generally abrasive player and his choice to vote me because of a few highly typical posts is based mostly on the fact that he knows I am in three n games and hosting one. he thinks u won't be able to defend myself or see through him. he is wrong. I've browsed the thread very quickly, and basically ignored everything except this post. You seem to be under some gross misapprehension of what I would/wouldn't do as town. Simply put, and I'm about to paraphase, you've made several posts which look like this: "you suck" "gonna vote you you flame" "no" "this is shit" "flaming poohead" Now, I'm aware you're currently hosting a game, and playing another, especially since I was so fucking sexy in that other game I just got killed on the first day. My point is, posts such as the above are not the usual quality I'm used to from Blazinghand. I'm used to ridiculous meta cases, tryhard shit, and perceptive humbo jumbo. Not "you flame lolololol vote lolol". Now, forgive me if I'm wrong, but such posts I don't actually think are typical of you, usually they're backed up with pretty solid reasoning, quotes from wherever, evidence. I don't think I'm unfair in saying this. What I actually find most suspicious out of everything you've been saying is this "marv knows how to use meta, he wouldn't do this as mafia" (yes, I know how to use meta, and the fact I have certain feelings from you as either alignment is not something you can jump on, try again) or "i can defend myself, i can see right through him" - I'm entirely transparent, and trying to paint what I'm doing as some kind of consipiracy is quite ridiculous. If you're town, I'm pretty happy to work with you, and I respect your opinion (as you well know), but this absurd rhetoric isn't going to cut it. Are we clear on what's happening? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
the gist is there :d | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Blazing, what makes vayne mafia this game when he was town this game? what has he done this game that he didn't do last game? thanks! | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 06:18 marvellosity wrote: Anyway, I've said my piece, so let's go again: Blazing, what makes vayne mafia this game when he was town this game? what has he done this game that he didn't do last game? thanks! edit: shit i've had a bit to drink. *when vayne was town last game (Carnival). if you're alive in that game still, please tell me to shut up and go away. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 06:18 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 06:13 goodkarma wrote: It's worth noting that Vayne proposed a no lynch as town in his last newbie game that just finished up. He also hesitated to give reads that game too... I don't feel he's a good lynch right now since his play (though bad) is consistent with what I've seen him do as town before. As someone who was in the last newbie game, Vayne is playing quite similar. D1 he prodded a little and got a good number of people pissed at him then D2 he went quiet. He had a some suspicions on people but held back for the most part on revealing them. I did not like his play style that game as I felt the more information we had out, the better. Slightly sideways question - do you know anything of me? Whether the answer is yes or no, what do you make of my posting so far? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
All these questions sound pretty loaded, but actually I just want to know what you think. ta. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 06:13 VayneAuthority wrote: lol you havent played in a game with me yet so ill fill you in. I always garner massive day 1 attention because my "shitty" analysis is pretty accurate. Scum want me gone early. There's no WIFOM when were talking a difference in playstyles here. I was just browsing filters and I found this hilarious. This is a totally useless post, but I really did find this hilarious. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 06:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:13 VayneAuthority wrote: lol you havent played in a game with me yet so ill fill you in. I always garner massive day 1 attention because my "shitty" analysis is pretty accurate. Scum want me gone early. There's no WIFOM when were talking a difference in playstyles here. I was just browsing filters and I found this hilarious. This is a totally useless post, but I really did find this hilarious. whats the joke so that I may appease to your funny bone more easily chap? I just saw you throw your newbie game because you were too much of a pussy to follow your instincts. this does not translate to = scum want me gone early (you were left alive to lylo) hopefully this doesn't sound like a massive putdown, but... um... yeah. I mean, maybe you're feared on mafiascum, but don't make claims about how you're feared here until you have a legitimate reason to think so. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 06:31 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 06:28 marvellosity wrote: Do you think I've been unfair in anything I've written about him so far? Not particularly, no. But this question is weird. I've never seen you care so much about your image. you misinterpret my question, because it's not about my image, it's about how valid my pursuit is. I've pursued BH to a degree, and it's useful for me to get your feelings on what I've done. take it or leave it ^^ I'm pretty sure you can understand I have absolutely no use in you validating me as I'm mafia. Not that it proves me town, but if i were mafia, i really don't give a shit what you think about me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 06:36 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 06:32 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 18 2013 06:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:13 VayneAuthority wrote: lol you havent played in a game with me yet so ill fill you in. I always garner massive day 1 attention because my "shitty" analysis is pretty accurate. Scum want me gone early. There's no WIFOM when were talking a difference in playstyles here. I was just browsing filters and I found this hilarious. This is a totally useless post, but I really did find this hilarious. whats the joke so that I may appease to your funny bone more easily chap? I just saw you throw your newbie game because you were too much of a pussy to follow your instincts. this does not translate to = scum want me gone early (you were left alive to lylo) hopefully this doesn't sound like a massive putdown, but... um... yeah. I mean, maybe you're feared on mafiascum, but don't make claims about how you're feared here until you have a legitimate reason to think so. I threw the game? The other townie came in and voted at the last second for me. Why the fuck would it have mattered? I made it to lylo because I played my part as town perfectly, suspicious enough to stay alive and not bad enough to get lynched. you made it to lylo because mafia didn't deem you worth killing. I know this because I was coaching mafia. At lylo, you said "i think dude B is mafia, but the dead townie thought dude A was mafia, so i'll vote for him". This was about 36 hours before the remaining townie voted for you. Further, staying alive is not a success in mafia, it means you were too shit to kill. Look, dude, I don't care where your ego is at or what you think, but don't bullshit in this game. MY game. I coached your last game and you were fucking easy meat because you were a coward. Argue it all you like but that's what it was. when you're ready to use honesty, then comment on this game. Otherwise everything you say just feels like bullshitting. Don't type fucking bullshit like "mafia want me dead early" because no, from what I've seen, mafia very much want you alive. Do we understand each other? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 06:42 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 06:40 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:36 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 18 2013 06:32 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 18 2013 06:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:13 VayneAuthority wrote: lol you havent played in a game with me yet so ill fill you in. I always garner massive day 1 attention because my "shitty" analysis is pretty accurate. Scum want me gone early. There's no WIFOM when were talking a difference in playstyles here. I was just browsing filters and I found this hilarious. This is a totally useless post, but I really did find this hilarious. whats the joke so that I may appease to your funny bone more easily chap? I just saw you throw your newbie game because you were too much of a pussy to follow your instincts. this does not translate to = scum want me gone early (you were left alive to lylo) hopefully this doesn't sound like a massive putdown, but... um... yeah. I mean, maybe you're feared on mafiascum, but don't make claims about how you're feared here until you have a legitimate reason to think so. I threw the game? The other townie came in and voted at the last second for me. Why the fuck would it have mattered? I made it to lylo because I played my part as town perfectly, suspicious enough to stay alive and not bad enough to get lynched. you made it to lylo because mafia didn't deem you worth killing. I know this because I was coaching mafia. At lylo, you said "i think dude B is mafia, but the dead townie thought dude A was mafia, so i'll vote for him". This was about 36 hours before the remaining townie voted for you. Further, staying alive is not a success in mafia, it means you were too shit to kill. Look, dude, I don't care where your ego is at or what you think, but don't bullshit in this game. MY game. I coached your last game and you were fucking easy meat because you were a coward. Argue it all you like but that's what it was. when you're ready to use honesty, then comment on this game. Otherwise everything you say just feels like bullshitting. Don't type fucking bullshit like "mafia want me dead early" because no, from what I've seen, mafia very much want you alive. Do we understand each other? Nope, my reads were correct, your wrong, peace. you lost. ggnore. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 06:43 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 06:42 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:42 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 18 2013 06:40 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:36 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 18 2013 06:32 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 18 2013 06:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:13 VayneAuthority wrote: lol you havent played in a game with me yet so ill fill you in. I always garner massive day 1 attention because my "shitty" analysis is pretty accurate. Scum want me gone early. There's no WIFOM when were talking a difference in playstyles here. I was just browsing filters and I found this hilarious. This is a totally useless post, but I really did find this hilarious. whats the joke so that I may appease to your funny bone more easily chap? I just saw you throw your newbie game because you were too much of a pussy to follow your instincts. this does not translate to = scum want me gone early (you were left alive to lylo) hopefully this doesn't sound like a massive putdown, but... um... yeah. I mean, maybe you're feared on mafiascum, but don't make claims about how you're feared here until you have a legitimate reason to think so. I threw the game? The other townie came in and voted at the last second for me. Why the fuck would it have mattered? I made it to lylo because I played my part as town perfectly, suspicious enough to stay alive and not bad enough to get lynched. you made it to lylo because mafia didn't deem you worth killing. I know this because I was coaching mafia. At lylo, you said "i think dude B is mafia, but the dead townie thought dude A was mafia, so i'll vote for him". This was about 36 hours before the remaining townie voted for you. Further, staying alive is not a success in mafia, it means you were too shit to kill. Look, dude, I don't care where your ego is at or what you think, but don't bullshit in this game. MY game. I coached your last game and you were fucking easy meat because you were a coward. Argue it all you like but that's what it was. when you're ready to use honesty, then comment on this game. Otherwise everything you say just feels like bullshitting. Don't type fucking bullshit like "mafia want me dead early" because no, from what I've seen, mafia very much want you alive. Do we understand each other? Nope, my reads were correct, your wrong, peace. you lost. ggnore. oh wow I lost in a game with 2 modkills on towns, you must be such a good coach bro. Oh wait mafia got railed and you got bailed out by modkills l0l. just stop talking you look like a moron. you've got a lot to learn. you were alive at a 2-1 lylo and you voted for a townie. I've never done that. you specifically said in this thread "mafia like to kill me early". No, mafia love to leave you alive because at lylo you'll vote for townies. You can rage at me all you like, but are you going to play the game, or talk about how awesome you are? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 06:46 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 06:45 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:43 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 18 2013 06:42 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:42 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 18 2013 06:40 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:36 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 18 2013 06:32 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 18 2013 06:25 marvellosity wrote: [quote] I was just browsing filters and I found this hilarious. This is a totally useless post, but I really did find this hilarious. whats the joke so that I may appease to your funny bone more easily chap? I just saw you throw your newbie game because you were too much of a pussy to follow your instincts. this does not translate to = scum want me gone early (you were left alive to lylo) hopefully this doesn't sound like a massive putdown, but... um... yeah. I mean, maybe you're feared on mafiascum, but don't make claims about how you're feared here until you have a legitimate reason to think so. I threw the game? The other townie came in and voted at the last second for me. Why the fuck would it have mattered? I made it to lylo because I played my part as town perfectly, suspicious enough to stay alive and not bad enough to get lynched. you made it to lylo because mafia didn't deem you worth killing. I know this because I was coaching mafia. At lylo, you said "i think dude B is mafia, but the dead townie thought dude A was mafia, so i'll vote for him". This was about 36 hours before the remaining townie voted for you. Further, staying alive is not a success in mafia, it means you were too shit to kill. Look, dude, I don't care where your ego is at or what you think, but don't bullshit in this game. MY game. I coached your last game and you were fucking easy meat because you were a coward. Argue it all you like but that's what it was. when you're ready to use honesty, then comment on this game. Otherwise everything you say just feels like bullshitting. Don't type fucking bullshit like "mafia want me dead early" because no, from what I've seen, mafia very much want you alive. Do we understand each other? Nope, my reads were correct, your wrong, peace. you lost. ggnore. oh wow I lost in a game with 2 modkills on towns, you must be such a good coach bro. Oh wait mafia got railed and you got bailed out by modkills l0l. just stop talking you look like a moron. you've got a lot to learn. you were alive at a 2-1 lylo and you voted for a townie. I've never done that. you specifically said in this thread "mafia like to kill me early". No, mafia love to leave you alive because at lylo you'll vote for townies. You can rage at me all you like, but are you going to play the game, or talk about how awesome you are? Don't quote something if you're just going to dodge it. Im playing the game just stopped to take out some trash. After you buddy. If you've never voted for a townie at lylo then you've probably played 10 games max, nice credit loss bud. click the "profile" button on any of my posts. now weep and learn. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 06:48 s0Lstice wrote: yea I'm not down with a Vayne lynch right now. at this moment, I could lynch Stutters though. call it OMGUS if you want, but pulling punches on your initial pressure looks a little weird...see below Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote: On May 18 2013 03:01 s0Lstice wrote: the fact that i've only ever played town is a pretty important piece of information to share for people who don't know me/haven't played with me. getting my share on, don't hate Maybe I'm reading to much into this but I'm wondering why you want people to focus on your meta? Let's say I tell you this is like my 13th game without rolling scum. What does that tell you about my play this game that you'd consider important at all right now? also don't like how he jumped on Vayne, seemed almost reflexive ##Vote Stutters695 s0lstice, I'm reading very little into this. what are you seeing that makes you so comfortable to make a vote? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 06:57 Blazinghand wrote: So, new rule: Vayne is a VI. Ignore him, check him if you are a DT or vig him if you are a vigi, policy lynch him before lylo if he's still alive. There's a possibility he also rolled scum but judging by his last game and this one there's no real way to tell. Not a worthwhile D1 lynch. I'm SO very tempted to agree, but Vayne is 1/16 of the players here. Vayne - I know you think s0listice's original meat claims were suspicious, what do you make of his subsequent explanations? Do you like them, do you feel they incriminate him more? Whichever way, why? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 07:03 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 06:58 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 06:57 Blazinghand wrote: So, new rule: Vayne is a VI. Ignore him, check him if you are a DT or vig him if you are a vigi, policy lynch him before lylo if he's still alive. There's a possibility he also rolled scum but judging by his last game and this one there's no real way to tell. Not a worthwhile D1 lynch. I'm SO very tempted to agree, but Vayne is 1/16 of the players here. Vayne - I know you think s0listice's original meat claims were suspicious, what do you make of his subsequent explanations? Do you like them, do you feel they incriminate him more? Whichever way, why? Alright first I want to apologize as I also did to Prome in the other thread by way of PM, once I get into an argument I become a pathetic piece of shit. Second, I want to say that its a sort of softclaim by s0lstice that him and stutters are mafia together. Seems like a bus to me, and yes it incriminates him more. Still wouldnt want to lynch today but if you guys are going to force me to either of them would be my vote. I've been reading LXI and basically you think in a way that I don't understand at all, but that's fine. What did s0lstice say that incriminated him? What incriminates him more? Why don't you want to lynch him today? I literally don't understand your point of view at all, so I need you to explain it to me so I can understand how you think. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
points 1 and 2 don't hold up. especially because lurking is a bad thing for maifa, and encouraging anyone to post can be pretty town motivated. point 3 could be valid though. the vote on stutters looks pretty weak. I can't see any good reason for s0lstice to want to kill stutters, it all looks a little contrived. Not sure what to make of it all, I don't get massively strong feelings about any of it either way. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 07:16 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 07:15 VayneAuthority wrote: Also I dont want to lynch him because I hate lynching day one, accidentally bringing out a PR role is literally such a bad start that it can be almost impossible to recover from if its a strong role. Also take into account simple probability, whats the chances of us finding scum based on no real evidence? 25%. I would never take those chances would you? see how could you possibly lynch a guy who legitimately thinks this is an ok post to make? There's no heuristic that could possibly distinguish scum VA from town VA. everyone should unvote this guy it's not really worth talking about, but he doesn't realise that on TL we're skilled enough to find mafia day 1 fairly regularly :p | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 07:21 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 07:20 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 07:16 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 07:15 VayneAuthority wrote: Also I dont want to lynch him because I hate lynching day one, accidentally bringing out a PR role is literally such a bad start that it can be almost impossible to recover from if its a strong role. Also take into account simple probability, whats the chances of us finding scum based on no real evidence? 25%. I would never take those chances would you? see how could you possibly lynch a guy who legitimately thinks this is an ok post to make? There's no heuristic that could possibly distinguish scum VA from town VA. everyone should unvote this guy it's not really worth talking about, but he doesn't realise that on TL we're skilled enough to find mafia day 1 fairly regularly :p its more the fact that I come from playing on a site where EVERY DAY is mylo until its lylo. then you play on a stupid site. because that means one mislynch means town loses, which is extraordinarily dumb. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
vayne is probably town because he's constantly answered me in a pretty consistent manner. this isn't a certain read, but meh, maybe we should be looking somewhere else today. he seems to be saying some really weird shit that he genuinely believes in without being scared of it. yes? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 07:31 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 07:27 marvellosity wrote: Ok. btw people can semi-ignore me until tomorrow when I'm more sober, but my current thought is this: vayne is probably town because he's constantly answered me in a pretty consistent manner. this isn't a certain read, but meh, maybe we should be looking somewhere else today. he seems to be saying some really weird shit that he genuinely believes in without being scared of it. yes? I said this pages ago. But yeah, it's nice you seem to agree. yeah. but i'm more thorough than you ![]() ok, you and bh agree. this time spent was worthwhile. let's focus on some other no-hoper. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
thanks! | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
##unvote '##vote: dandel ion | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 07:46 Dandel Ion wrote: "Usual bullshit" "Usual" hi You know I really want you dead every game too since your voice grates my ears, so I'mma be over here and try that real quick. ##Unvote ##Vote marv Cool townclaim btw. yeah, i know you're a cunt, and i know you think i'm a cunt. yet in personality 2, you got over your feelings and somehow protected me when we were both town. so your explanation is insufficient. try again. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 07:48 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 07:46 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 07:46 Dandel Ion wrote: "Usual bullshit" "Usual" hi You know I really want you dead every game too since your voice grates my ears, so I'mma be over here and try that real quick. ##Unvote ##Vote marv Cool townclaim btw. yeah, i know you're a cunt, and i know you think i'm a cunt. yet in personality 2, you got over your feelings and somehow protected me when we were both town. so your explanation is insufficient. try again. Yeah but it also taught me to not protect you ever again. Now this is as pointless as the previous shitfest(s), so I'mma get to reading I s'ppose no, that's COMPLETELY irrelevant as to whether i'm town or mafia. that's me playing badly or well. i'm 14-2 as town recently, and personality was one of that 2. please come up with an actual reason i'm mafia. thank you. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 07:55 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 07:43 marvellosity wrote: my conclusion is that i'll vote you for being a troll, because despite your usual bullshit i know you like to try to win. ##unvote '##vote: dandel ion Marv, I want to talk to you about this, because you doing this is not what I expect from town Marv. You know well that Dandel trolls as either alignment. aren't you reading at all? In personality, dandel specifically protected me as his protection target, which he had to protect ONE OF, all game long, because he was certain i was town. i was fucking useless in personality. it's my worst game by far. and yet a town dandel protected me becuase he was sure i was town. dandel does not "troll as either alignment" the fact you're saying this shows a remarkable lack of understanding of how dandel plays. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
blackmail? bullshit? totally. that's how strongly i feel about it. his play here is total nonsense. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 07:58 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 07:56 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 07:55 yamato77 wrote: On May 18 2013 07:43 marvellosity wrote: my conclusion is that i'll vote you for being a troll, because despite your usual bullshit i know you like to try to win. ##unvote '##vote: dandel ion Marv, I want to talk to you about this, because you doing this is not what I expect from town Marv. You know well that Dandel trolls as either alignment. aren't you reading at all? In personality, dandel specifically protected me as his protection target, which he had to protect ONE OF, all game long, because he was certain i was town. i was fucking useless in personality. it's my worst game by far. and yet a town dandel protected me becuase he was sure i was town. dandel does not "troll as either alignment" the fact you're saying this shows a remarkable lack of understanding of how dandel plays. I got railed on as scum in RTP because of this exact argument, and I was wrong. Marv, what the fuck. you're an idiot. later. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
you're really making that comparison? didn't think so. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
there's nothing else to say. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
The only thing that drives me is a desire to win. Witness: Rock Band Mini Mafia: town - win Liquid City: mafia - win Your Clothes, Give them to me Mafia: town - win Mario Mini Mafia: town - win Chrono Trigger: town - win Paranoia Mafia: town - win Hero Mini Mafia: mafia - win TL Mafia LVIII: town - loss TL Mafia LIX: town - win MTG Mafia II: town - win Fruity Mafia: town - win This Town Aint Big Enough Mafia: town - win Hydra Mini Mafia: town - win Personality 2: town - loss (horrendous) Red Team's Prize: town - win Ego Mini Mafia: town - win Hydra Mini Mafia II: town - win This is my recent town record. Pretty fucking stellar you might say. Let's analyse the losses: TLVIII - I ragequit like a useless noob. ok. Personality 2? I was totally useless and I lost (even though DANDEL READ ME AS TOWN). fine. Other than that I basically win all the time. i am a winner. In this case, Dandel is purposefully antagonising me, for no good reason. There is literally no reason for it at all. I'm convinced he's mafia, and like my other games like I always win, I'm putting my vote where my mouth is. You can join me in my extraordinarily good record, or you can join the troll who wants to antagonise me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:10 Dandel Ion wrote: Yes now tell me why that is alignment indicative in any way at all. because you have at least a basic understanding of how to read me, as witnessed in personality when you read me as town early, yet you antaogonise me here. thanks. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:11 iamperfection wrote: yeah but how does him antagonizing you make it a scum claim? Scum dandel is going to come in here and atagonize a town marv? For what purpose? How does it accomplish his goals as scum? because i'm well known to go fucking nuts when i'm accused for terrible reasons? do you think i've come across as even slightly scummy so far? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:15 iamperfection wrote: but no i dont think you have been scummy at all so far Right, so we have a couple of really, really basic facts: 1) i was shit in personality, dandel decided to protect me really really early because he was sure i was town 2) see 1 3) again, have you seen how shit i am when under pressure? (LVIII - modkill) is the best example 4) maybe i occasionally throw games as town, but again, my recent record is literally 87.5% as town. I'm fucking pulling this record in. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
seriously. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:19 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:11 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 08:10 Dandel Ion wrote: Yes now tell me why that is alignment indicative in any way at all. because you have at least a basic understanding of how to read me, as witnessed in personality when you read me as town early, yet you antaogonise me here. thanks. I still fail to see what that has to do with my alignment. If you want though, I can dig up the games where I misread your townplay as scumplay, I think there should be around two of those. I wasn't scum in them either. I don't like using that since it makes me sound dumb even though I'm a really smart chap, but there you go. Now tell me since when do you think I'm actually good enough at this game that the accuracy of my reads reflects on my alignment, because I know that you don't actually think I'm good enough at this game for that to hold water. And that's a serious jump in mentality, and I have not seen a single reason for it to occur. please find those games, that would be appreciated. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Personally I don't remember it happening but I understand I can be blinded by my rage. So yeah, feel free. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:21 iamperfection wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:18 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 08:15 iamperfection wrote: but no i dont think you have been scummy at all so far Right, so we have a couple of really, really basic facts: 1) i was shit in personality, dandel decided to protect me really really early because he was sure i was town 2) see 1 3) again, have you seen how shit i am when under pressure? (LVIII - modkill) is the best example 4) maybe i occasionally throw games as town, but again, my recent record is literally 87.5% as town. I'm fucking pulling this record in. i would say rockband is your best example of being under pressure and how i would expect you to react as town. Which is somewhat how your reacting here. What do you think of sputnick? I have zero opinion of sputnik right now. from what i remember he posted uselessly a couple of times with fluff. I'm willing to see what he comes up with tomorrow. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:21 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:19 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 08:19 Dandel Ion wrote: On May 18 2013 08:11 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 08:10 Dandel Ion wrote: Yes now tell me why that is alignment indicative in any way at all. because you have at least a basic understanding of how to read me, as witnessed in personality when you read me as town early, yet you antaogonise me here. thanks. I still fail to see what that has to do with my alignment. If you want though, I can dig up the games where I misread your townplay as scumplay, I think there should be around two of those. I wasn't scum in them either. I don't like using that since it makes me sound dumb even though I'm a really smart chap, but there you go. Now tell me since when do you think I'm actually good enough at this game that the accuracy of my reads reflects on my alignment, because I know that you don't actually think I'm good enough at this game for that to hold water. And that's a serious jump in mentality, and I have not seen a single reason for it to occur. please find those games, that would be appreciated. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=389088 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=403256 when did you find me scum in red team? i don't remember that at all. magic i'm discarding because you were with acro, but if you genuininly thought so in red team, that kinda makes a difference. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
i think i've been a qtpie so far. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:24 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:23 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 08:21 Dandel Ion wrote: On May 18 2013 08:19 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 08:19 Dandel Ion wrote: On May 18 2013 08:11 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 08:10 Dandel Ion wrote: Yes now tell me why that is alignment indicative in any way at all. because you have at least a basic understanding of how to read me, as witnessed in personality when you read me as town early, yet you antaogonise me here. thanks. I still fail to see what that has to do with my alignment. If you want though, I can dig up the games where I misread your townplay as scumplay, I think there should be around two of those. I wasn't scum in them either. I don't like using that since it makes me sound dumb even though I'm a really smart chap, but there you go. Now tell me since when do you think I'm actually good enough at this game that the accuracy of my reads reflects on my alignment, because I know that you don't actually think I'm good enough at this game for that to hold water. And that's a serious jump in mentality, and I have not seen a single reason for it to occur. please find those games, that would be appreciated. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=389088 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=403256 when did you find me scum in red team? i don't remember that at all. magic i'm discarding because you were with acro, but if you genuininly thought so in red team, that kinda makes a difference. Eh, early on i think. Probably. I remember I drew a picture about it. I just checked it out. You did call me scum in that game, for no reason as per usual. That does mean i shouldn't find it that unusual in this game. it still stinks though. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
We're all bitching at each other, which is lovely. Who are we letting get a free pass? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:29 iamperfection wrote: so you dont remember this? Show nested quote + On November 21 2012 08:08 Blazinghand wrote: So I'm dropping a made meta read on Iamp for his scum play in GSL Mini III and his town play in Liquid City. Iamperfections' meta as scum is lurking and big gaps between small posts, besides defending himself. As Town he tends to flood with smaller posts but he's always in the thread and interacting with people. Bearing in mind GSL Mini III is an unusually extreme version of Iamperf's meta, it's still indicative-- in fact, Hapa catches him as scum that game based on meta with extreme ease (link). In this game Iamperfection is doing his typical "bury them in a mountain of posts!" style town play. He has periods of 2-3 hours where he'll post like 10 times, then he'll go away for ~8 hours then come back and do the same. This is how he plays as town. n terms of associative tells, he interacts with Hapa in a natural way that doesn't seem like they're scum together. I also like this read he makes on kickstart early on (link) that as scum he wouldn't want to. His suspicions of Hapa (link) tie in well with his willingness to last-minute votehop (link). Although he does defend crossfire here (link) I view that as more a point in his favor than against him, as Crossfire was a liability for the scumteam and was inevitably gonna be lynched. In particular his interaction with marv here (link) and his attempts to get crossfire to play the damn game here (link) and here (link) make it seem like he really genuinely think crossfire is town. Basically I don't see scum making a post like this: (link) or like this: (link). This is all consistent with a legitimate town-read on cross, which, given the scenario, is a bad move as scum. Cross WAS going to flip eventually and bussing him was optimal scum play. I'm liking this a lot. Just sayin' | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
1) blazing makes a shitload of effort to look at iamp's meta, having played with iamp before 2) blazing makes no effort to look at iamp's meta, despite having played with iamp's meta before i'm liking the difference between 1 and 2 right now | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
##vote: blazinghand | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:37 iamperfection wrote: blazinghand does have a point about jar jar he looks kind of tera bad agreed, the biggest issue is that blazing is voting stutters, and not jarjar. do you see what i'm saying? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
i've seen you in recent games say "if you can't support this case with meta, your case sucks". can you? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:39 iamperfection wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:37 marvellosity wrote: blazing, i kinda feel ok about a Jarjar vote instead. how does that feel? Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:37 iamperfection wrote: blazinghand does have a point about jar jar he looks kind of tera bad I feel very good about a town marv now this has happened before. and i feel very good about you saying this. can we have sex now? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:40 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:39 marvellosity wrote: Let's put it this way Blazing. Stutters is always a useless pile of shit. literally always. i've seen you in recent games say "if you can't support this case with meta, your case sucks". can you? if he's a kushm4sta, then my case on him isn't valid. I'll go dive some meta then. I don't like this, Blazing. i'm not going to shout at you, because I don't feel it's... productive. I know you're "up" on the TL scene to know enough that Stutters is generally an extremely lurky mofo. he has played 10 town games or so and always been lurky/useless in all of them. I don't like how much you generally like meta and how little you're willing to look into Stutters' meta. Do you understand my concerns? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
:/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
not because i think you're town, but because... you might be town. i give NOT ONE SHIT about what other games you're in. my only concern is this game. that's how i'm operating going forwards. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
it's really easy to look terrible in these conversations. the real trick is, who is avoiding them. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
grush hasn't given us starsenses. i'd kinda like to lynch him for that tbh. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
LOOK AT GRUSH PLEASE PEOPLE, I COULD KILL HIM TOO. ##vote: JJD | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:51 iamperfection wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:51 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 08:50 marvellosity wrote: jarjar would. but so would others? grush hasn't given us starsenses. i'd kinda like to lynch him for that tbh. does he really claim town as towna nd not claim town as scum yes yes. 100% | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:52 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:52 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 08:51 iamperfection wrote: On May 18 2013 08:51 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 08:50 marvellosity wrote: jarjar would. but so would others? grush hasn't given us starsenses. i'd kinda like to lynch him for that tbh. does he really claim town as towna nd not claim town as scum yes yes. 100% wait, really 100%? >.> In my experience, literally 100%, yes. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
##Vote: grush57 | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:54 Dandel Ion wrote: Wait why are you voting grush now? Just cause no starsenses? Or can you actually read him just cos no starsenses. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:55 iamperfection wrote: we can just wait on grush he isn't a concern. mafia is always a concern. plus, he spoke to me as mason in LIX, which gives me some kinda insight (hopefully) | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:58 iamperfection wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:56 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 08:55 iamperfection wrote: we can just wait on grush he isn't a concern. mafia is always a concern. plus, he spoke to me as mason in LIX, which gives me some kinda insight (hopefully) what do you mean we literally know he will confirm himself one way or the other. 1. He wont come back lynch him 2. He comes back no starsenses lynch him 3 he posts starsenses dont lynch him well, yes. that's the easy way of looking at it. i can't disagree. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
apologies to anyone i riled and vice versa, but i think it came in useful. i think we have some really good targets for tomorrow. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 14:04 s0Lstice wrote: All the same...do you know what I would do if I was in Marv's shoes? After all these games, the victories, the early NKs as town, the high win percentage as scum...with that Hapa case floating around out there, and (this is important) people around me itching to lynch me as the game goes on regardless of how I've played because as town I'm so rarely alive late into games.. I might be just fine with artificially tantruming, simply to have something to point to when the inevitable 'why is marv still alive' questions start to pop up. I'm not saying this is definitely what was going on, but I'm keeping it around to chew on for awhile. Oh and Marv improves town atmosphere no matter what his alignment is. Reading the thread atm. I'd quite like to know where you're going with this, because it's an awfully passive-aggressive way of trying to put suspicion on me. Your argument boils down to "marv was more polite than i expected" and you've managed to drag that out over numerous posts and paragraphs. You're also basically completely making up a narrative for a player who isn't you, and for a player you can't possibly understand. What gives? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 15:58 yamato77 wrote: GK is obviously town. You don't get to make statements like this. In LXI you called Giggles "obviously" or "blatantly" town. He flipped mafia. You have to explain yourself. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 16:28 yamato77 wrote: I really hate reading Marv's filter. So much of it is devoted to being a complete dick, it's hard to discern his true alignment. I like his pursuit of BH, but he hasn't had the balls to stick to it for any lengthy amount of time. His fight with Dandel was completely stupid, based off of ass reasoning, and ultimately went nowhere. Other than that, he seems overly preoccupied with how people perceive how he's playing so far and rather sheepish in his most recent voting. Maybe we're seeing Marv from Personality rear his ugly head again, but I feel like he's playing like shit. I don't think scum Marv would play this way, however, so I guess he's town. I really don't like that this is the case. fuck off, yamato. you little twat. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 17:42 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 17:39 yamato77 wrote: On May 18 2013 17:36 DarthPunk wrote: On May 18 2013 17:31 yamato77 wrote: Yeah, when I was reading that part of his filter, I was feeling a bit suspicious of him. What do you make of him claiming he was drunk? Do you think that's a possible explanation for his erratic play? I already posted about that previously. Shit like that makes me suspicious because you are already trying to absolve yourself of responsibility from the things you say whilst you are saying them. Why bother saying anything at all then? I don't feel like scum Marv would claim being drunk just to act like an idiot in the thread. he totally would no, I wouldn't. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
DP, do you ever learn? ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 18:19 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 18:13 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 16:28 yamato77 wrote: I really hate reading Marv's filter. So much of it is devoted to being a complete dick, it's hard to discern his true alignment. I like his pursuit of BH, but he hasn't had the balls to stick to it for any lengthy amount of time. His fight with Dandel was completely stupid, based off of ass reasoning, and ultimately went nowhere. Other than that, he seems overly preoccupied with how people perceive how he's playing so far and rather sheepish in his most recent voting. Maybe we're seeing Marv from Personality rear his ugly head again, but I feel like he's playing like shit. I don't think scum Marv would play this way, however, so I guess he's town. I really don't like that this is the case. fuck off, yamato. you little twat. Look, I don't think you're scum, so we can quit with the being angry shtick. yeah, if you quit posting things like a twat, sure. You basically insult my play before making a case on the same conclusion on BH's pursuit of iamp that I'd already made. It's rude and I don't like it. you can't say i'm playing like shit (I am not playing like shit) and then steal my case. Now, I don't care that you stole and expanded my case, that's great and all, but it does seem rather ridiculous. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 18:24 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 18:23 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 18:19 yamato77 wrote: On May 18 2013 18:13 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 16:28 yamato77 wrote: I really hate reading Marv's filter. So much of it is devoted to being a complete dick, it's hard to discern his true alignment. I like his pursuit of BH, but he hasn't had the balls to stick to it for any lengthy amount of time. His fight with Dandel was completely stupid, based off of ass reasoning, and ultimately went nowhere. Other than that, he seems overly preoccupied with how people perceive how he's playing so far and rather sheepish in his most recent voting. Maybe we're seeing Marv from Personality rear his ugly head again, but I feel like he's playing like shit. I don't think scum Marv would play this way, however, so I guess he's town. I really don't like that this is the case. fuck off, yamato. you little twat. Look, I don't think you're scum, so we can quit with the being angry shtick. yeah, if you quit posting things like a twat, sure. You basically insult my play before making a case on the same conclusion on BH's pursuit of iamp that I'd already made. It's rude and I don't like it. you can't say i'm playing like shit (I am not playing like shit) and then steal my case. Now, I don't care that you stole and expanded my case, that's great and all, but it does seem rather ridiculous. I already told you your case was good before. My problems with your play was your unwarranted aggression and erratic play once Dandel entered the thread. It was difficult to read. I apologize for bruising your ego, but I have to read your posts to discern your alignment, you know. yes, but perhaps best not to antagonise me by saying i'm being a "complete dick" and "playing like shit", eh? ![]() I literally can't remember anything WoS has posted, so I'll have to read up on him. I don't remember getting bad vibes but I'll check it out. WoS likes to get in trouble every day 1, and I did promise him some tunnel-mode. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Couple of other things: I don't like how grush had to be pushed into the starsenses thing. Usually he's very happy to jump on it immediately when prodded. If I recall, DP found an example where he didn't use it early once, so meh. I'm not sold on him being town but I don't know if I can be convinced that he's mafia at this point either. Secondly, JJD. I don't like him being excused for being in 'big boy' games. In his newbie games, he was *significantly* lurkier as mafia. He was mafia in the game I hosted, and he spent lots of time posting in the scumQT, and no time posting in the thread. As town he's much more forthcoming. I think he's a pretty decent lynch right now. ##unvote ##vote: Jarjar | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 20:51 JarJarDrinks wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 19:16 marvellosity wrote: Secondly, JJD. I don't like him being excused for being in 'big boy' games. In his newbie games, he was *significantly* lurkier as mafia. He was mafia in the game I hosted, and he spent lots of time posting in the scumQT, and no time posting in the thread. As town he's much more forthcoming. I think he's a pretty decent lynch right now. [b] In all the game's I've been in, I'd imagine the majority of my posts came during the week while I was @ work. Don't want to make an excuse but I'm always gonna be a little less active on the weekend. Last game I got lynched day 1 and a big part of the reasoning was because I went inactive for a portion of the day. Just get stuck in. I love lynching dem lurkers on day 1 and at the moment you fit the bill. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 04:26 sputnik.theory wrote: People who have yet to offer any input in no particular order: cDgCorazon raynpelikoneet yamato77 - posted first popcorn and nothing since VayneAuthority - his birthday prolly busy :D goodkarma somehow i missed this at the time. what is this bullpoop? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
##Vote: sputnik He looks worse. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 18 2013 22:03 iamperfection wrote: marv do you think jarjar would try to throw dirt on bh if bh is town and jarjar were scum? Maybe? I understand what you're getting at, but I'm ambivalent about it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
WoS, your panties are in quite the twist. People are suspicious of you because basically you berated people for voting grush who only very reluctantly used his starsenses. It seemed way too sure. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 00:41 iamperfection wrote: spicy going against what town thinks right now makes me think he is more likely to be town. Spicy is probably town because basically he had a ready made case on s0lstice that he'd already written, but then decided to finish it off by telling us his posting had improved and he doesn't think he's mafia. Would have been so much easier just to go on and vote s0lstice at that stage (unless they're mafia together) | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 00:45 iamperfection wrote: Show nested quote + On May 19 2013 00:44 marvellosity wrote: On May 19 2013 00:41 iamperfection wrote: spicy going against what town thinks right now makes me think he is more likely to be town. Spicy is probably town because basically he had a ready made case on s0lstice that he'd already written, but then decided to finish it off by telling us his posting had improved and he doesn't think he's mafia. Would have been so much easier just to go on and vote s0lstice at that stage (unless they're mafia together) my reason is simpler therefore it is better yeah like that time zarepath was scum because he made a listpost except no. <3 | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
What is grush doing that's outside his usual town meta, that I'm sure you're taking into account? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
rayn - I'd had quite a bit to drink. So I wasn't very controlled in general last night. Wave - I find GK exceptionally hard to read day 1, and probably in general. His style is pretty aloof and standoffish (how he writes, rather than how he is) so I find it difficult to discern sincerity in his posts. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 05:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: I'm here now mofo, so, tell me why did you call my play scummy? say what? You're interrupting my Eurovision watching, bitch. I called your absence scummy. I'm not sure what to make of you since you've been here, you're decisively calling a lot of people mafia. The reasons aren't terrible but I'm having problems being that decisive about anyone, let alone multiple peoples. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 05:38 raynpelikoneet wrote: marv, i call people mafia for a reason, do you disagree with me? that's the 'reasons aren't terrible' bit. Like, take Dandel for example. you're outright calling him mafia for one post which may not be great, but is it really justified in being that decisive about? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I'm pretty obviously town to anyone who knows how I play, so I'm not going to entertain you on that one dear. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 05:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: I also wanna know where i'm lurky (meta) as scum as GK proposes? What do you think of GK marv? I already gave my extremely non-committal read of GK. Ask me better questions please, your current ones are boring and repetitive ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 02:25 goodkarma wrote: EBWOP: Rayne also belongs in the lurker / should be vigi shot category too, except from what I've just seen glimpsing into some of his past games, he actually has been more active as town than he has as scum. So he might be a good lynch candidate today too (definitely better than JJD and Sputnik) if he continues to lurk. Have you rolled scum apart from your newbie game? If not, then this really is a complete fabrication. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I'd like an explanation from GK on that one. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Apologies everyone for posting a bunch in a row :/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 05:57 raynpelikoneet wrote: I can get on a sputnik lynch aswell. EASY! lol. Somehow I have no idea whatsoever if what we've been talking about or done in this last page has been productive or not. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 06:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: yo marv, WoS is town. wasn't asking you, bitch <3 | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 06:45 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 19 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Vayne, i do not think your case is good. At all. One point why you call him suspicious: Suspicious. sums up the thread (completely useless) and then says he will just be waiting to see what happens, probably so he can drop a vote on the bandwagon late at night. A pretty mediocre read, so ill just keep an eye on him for now. Can you see what you are doing? I am being unsure of myself, but thats because im new to this whole lynch the fuck out of some one with PR roles still in play. I am doing my best. vayne, can you explain this better to me please? you've played twice on this forum before this game, where both times there was a lynch day 1, and there was no question of a no-lynch. why are you so surprised about our eagerness to lynch on day 1 given your experiences on this forum so far? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
In this game, in the first 2 days, town had massive problems with consolidation, despite it being plurality lynch. Votes were spread all over the place. Only on day 3 did GK understand the value of consolidation (even in plurality). So that point doesn't ring true to me, just because I know goodkarma was taught a serious lesson about consolidation. You can go read his filter from there, or perhaps you could read my post-game analysis there where I touch on the same things. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 06:56 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 19 2013 06:53 marvellosity wrote: On May 19 2013 06:45 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 19 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Vayne, i do not think your case is good. At all. One point why you call him suspicious: Suspicious. sums up the thread (completely useless) and then says he will just be waiting to see what happens, probably so he can drop a vote on the bandwagon late at night. A pretty mediocre read, so ill just keep an eye on him for now. Can you see what you are doing? I am being unsure of myself, but thats because im new to this whole lynch the fuck out of some one with PR roles still in play. I am doing my best. vayne, can you explain this better to me please? you've played twice on this forum before this game, where both times there was a lynch day 1, and there was no question of a no-lynch. why are you so surprised about our eagerness to lynch on day 1 given your experiences on this forum so far? I am more surprised about everyone jumping down my throat when I want to no lynch everytime so I am changing my playstyle so I am not a detriment to the town cause I want to win. does that make sense? Did you claim you want to no-lynch in those games? I guess I'll have to go look for myself. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 07:01 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 19 2013 06:58 marvellosity wrote: Wave - I hosted goodkarma's first (I think?) newbie game, number 24. In this game, in the first 2 days, town had massive problems with consolidation, despite it being plurality lynch. Votes were spread all over the place. Only on day 3 did GK understand the value of consolidation (even in plurality). So that point doesn't ring true to me, just because I know goodkarma was taught a serious lesson about consolidation. You can go read his filter from there, or perhaps you could read my post-game analysis there where I touch on the same things. Alright I suppose I can understand this then...sort of....but then why question it yourself at the same time I did? there's a reason i didn't make a case of it, dear. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 07:01 yamato77 wrote: I don't see anything in GK's filter that makes him scum. Marv, you said you don't like a WoS lynch anymore, why? he seems active and involved, and he doesn't look that different to any of his other games. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Your own words here "Wos' aggressiveness and decisiveness" - you think that's how a first-time mafia player would come across, when it's been pretty clear from past games he's shit-scared of rolling mafia? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 07:16 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + 9. s0Lstice-town for now- Since he dislikes sputnik and gk that seems good to me. 16. raynpelikoneet-null- wants to kill gk and sputnik makes him ok in my book bad activity though Okay, this guy claimed scum. ##Unvote; ##Vote: iamperfection ggyo this is spectacularly awful. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 07:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: okay, maybe you all are too retarded to see anything. when i flip town, kill iamp. kthxbye. this attitude is completely unaccepatble. you've called 4 or 5 players scum now. I think you've called more players scum than there are mafia. If you're town, take a step back, and play the game properly. I fucking LOVE to kill martyrs. You're no exception. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 07:24 raynpelikoneet wrote: okay, kill me, then kill iamp, you got a 1-1 trade. Totally incorrect. Because I will kill you, and I will call iamp town. Get a fucking grip. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Dying does nothing to validate your reads. It just makes us think you were retarded as town, not as mafia. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 07:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On May 19 2013 07:27 marvellosity wrote: the point is this, rayn. Dying does nothing to validate your reads. It just makes us think you were retarded as town, not as mafia. Yeah but i know what im doing, whether or not you believe it. No, this isn't a reason. the only reason to martyr as town (there isn't actually a real reason) is to try to validate your reads. I'm pointing out that you flipping does nothing to validate your reads. So do something else. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 07:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: iamp, yamato, marm; i am involved, i am voting for iamp atm. he is calling one gut town and one guy null for same reasons. that is bullshit imo. and marv. do not talk about martyring, you are the king of it. end of discussion. how am I the king of martyring? I've never martyred. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 10:22 GMT
#1050
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 10:26 GMT
#1051
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 11:07 GMT
#1053
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 11:21 GMT
#1057
Also, regarding Spicy, how do you take into account the reads that iamp and I made on him? have you factored this in? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 11:41 GMT
#1061
As mafia, why bother including this change of heart? Seems an easy opportunity just to plop a vote down. The thing with rayn is that he was super-active in his scum newbie game, which not only makes the meta weaker, but potentially flat-out incorrect. Hopefully you'll be back before deadline. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 12:06 GMT
#1064
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 12:09 GMT
#1066
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 14:35 GMT
#1079
On May 19 2013 22:28 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 19 2013 22:20 iamperfection wrote: On May 19 2013 22:17 DarthPunk wrote: On May 19 2013 22:15 iamperfection wrote: BH what did you claim mason ic? What is that Town blazinghand. i've seen him in situations like this before. See Mario Mini. There is a difference between claiming mason and jk. I don't know if I believe bh Well it is possible to verify if he is a mason. just tell him who to mason with and verify that. It IS possible he is a scum aligned mason. but i am not sure how likely that is in a mini. Either way i think it is best to wait and see when it comes to BH. I would like to hear more from marv to be honest. Marv what do you think of blazinghand? Blazing is pretty hard to read. Usually at some point as mafia he picks someone to tunnel and rides it until the cows come home. He did it in The Game, and he did very similar in Carnival. Here he's much more indecisive, which makes me think he's more likely to be town; for a player like Blazing especially it's pretty easy to tunnel someone, it's what he's good at. I also agree with you that a scum mason in a normal mini doesn't seem that likely. So for now, I'm gonna tentatively put him down as town. We can worry about him another day. On May 19 2013 23:27 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On May 19 2013 12:48 JarJarDrinks wrote: On May 19 2013 11:19 Spicydinosaur wrote: Jarjar on the other hand has posted some content, though very little. He's been the subject of attack a number of times but he has yet defended himself properly. Whether his in-activeness is due to RL or deliberate scum, I don't like it. I get the feeling he tried coasting D1 and got caught and really doesn't know what to do. His posts contain a lot of excuses which is scummy. I'm putting my vote on him. ##vote jarjardrinks I've said that I cant really be that active on the weekends. I don't know how that means my "posts contain a lot of excuses" And like, you're saying that I've yet to defend myself properly. Well the only real case against me is that I've been lurking. Anything I can say to defend myself I'm sure is gonna sound like more excuses to you. Is there something specific that you or someone is accusing me of that I should post a defense for? Your lurking is a huge problem and it seems you don't really care that people are upset that you are. Even if you have limited time, why not spend it filtering a player and getting an opinion on him off. This post feels like a delay of anything substantive. The best way you can defend yourself is to give me thoughts/opinions on the other players. vote is staying on you. I pretty much agree with this. GK's list post doesn't look too bad to me actually, the various gradients he has people in aren't massively far off where I have people, with one or two exceptions (of which Spicy is one). Overall I have quite a lot of slightly town reads, and not enough scumreads. Which gives me more confidence in lynching into one of JJD/sputnik. It'd be pretty nice if either of them created some content in the next few hours really. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 14:35 GMT
#1080
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 14:37 GMT
#1082
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 14:38 GMT
#1083
On May 19 2013 23:37 iamperfection wrote: Want to kill Sputnik Marv? well, my vote *is* currently on him dear. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 14:41 GMT
#1085
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 14:47 GMT
#1088
On May 19 2013 23:41 iamperfection wrote: You don't think scum mason is likely? What do you think would be the likely amount of blues in a 16 man and do you think there could be two town masons? I don't think I've ever seen a scum mason in a game classed as a normal mini? Granted this is a closed setup, so it's certainly possible, but I don't think I've ever seen it. If I'm understanding BH's role, he's a mason recruiter... so having 2 mason recruiters would seem pretty odd. Further, mason recruiter isn't actually that common of a role either in normal minis... so, mm. Number of blues in a 16 man? I'm assuming a 12-4 or an 11-4-1 distribution, and it kinda depends on the strength of the mafia roles, but I'd guess at 4 blues perhaps, depending on their strength. You want to kill BH, don't you? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 14:52 GMT
#1090
On May 19 2013 23:49 iamperfection wrote: We can kill sputnik today see if BH pulls his head out of his ass. what makes you favour sputnik over JJD so much? Just the fact he's been even more useless? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 16:34 GMT
#1110
On May 20 2013 01:32 JarJarDrinks wrote: Show nested quote + I like how you turn it around and say I'm making excuses and not calling you out for lying.On May 20 2013 01:25 DarthPunk wrote: On May 20 2013 01:22 JarJarDrinks wrote: On May 20 2013 00:49 DarthPunk wrote: Stop Lying. I'm KNOWN to lurk on the weekends. The last game I played started on the weekend. I was town and got voted off day 1 because of lurking. My activity is always gonna be alot better during the week once I'm sitting in front of a computer for 8 hours.Look at it this way. JJD is KNOWN to lurk as scum and not lurk as town. It is more likely that if he is lurking he is scum. I coached your scum game. Marv hosted it. I think we know what we are talking about. any quit with the excuses and make a case on someone that isn't blazinghand. You said that I'm known to not lurk as town. I pointed out how my last game I was voted out as town for lurking. So no, you don't know what you're talking about. Or you're purposefully misrepresenting the facts. So what do you make of BH's claim? Who do you want to kill today if not BH? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 16:44 GMT
#1113
In the game in the database, he made one, er, "trolly/fun" (? bad description maybe) post but then all of his subsequent posts were on the ball, talking about the game, calmly written. He asked about mayors running, he gave his preference (none :p) on the candidates, he gave his opinion. In this game he's yapped around in some weird Les Mis character I guess and offered no opinions on anything, other than a silly little list post. I think the use of meta here to clear his play is completely incorrect. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 16:49 GMT
#1118
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 16:56 GMT
#1122
On May 20 2013 01:53 JarJarDrinks wrote: Show nested quote + Obviously I think he's lying, otherwise I wouldn't still be voting vor him. He claimed after everyone started voting him to try and save himself. I'd assume that's a standard scum play.On May 20 2013 01:34 marvellosity wrote: So what do you make of BH's claim? Who do you want to kill today if not BH? If I had to choose for someone else to be lynched, I'd pick grush. Here's a slight case I posted against him: + Show Spoiler + On May 18 2013 21:09 JarJarDrinks wrote: So, in case I'm missing anything: this STARSENSES thing: I get that it's something grush usually says and didn't this game. Is there more to it than that or is that about it? I'd think that'd be a pretty dumb scum mistake if that's all it is. Though he'd obviously know all that so I don't think I'd read anything into it. HOWEVER, looking @ his filter, I'm trying to see if there's anything that looks townie about him. First he tells sputnik that he's playing textbook scum but when I ask about it he says he sounds noob town. The only other insight he offered was jumping on vayne. Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 04:45 JarJarDrinks wrote: On May 18 2013 04:28 grush57 wrote: damnit sputnik you're playing textbook scum You're saying that as if you're upset about it. Are you actually reading him as scum right now? The reason I questioned him here is it just sounds like he knows sputnik is town and playing bad. Not quite as sure about him as I am BH, but he's my second choice. BH has claimed at an even dumber point in the game before, back in Mario Mini Mafia when he had like 3 votes on him and he claimed because he was short of time. Turns out he was town there. Makes me pretty unsure about this claim. Not interested in sputnik? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 17:26 GMT
#1130
On May 20 2013 02:13 s0Lstice wrote: Marv, what do you think of yamato? I think yamato looks ok. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 19:49 GMT
#1186
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 19:54 GMT
#1189
For example, click this: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=mafia&t=ct&f=31&u=raynpelikoneet&gb=date&d= | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 19:56 GMT
#1193
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 19:58 GMT
#1195
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:02 GMT
#1196
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:04 GMT
#1199
I need you to explain to me why your explanation makes no sense :/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:05 GMT
#1200
On May 20 2013 05:03 grush57 wrote: I guess I'll vote spicy. ##Vote: Spicydinosaur If I wanted you to vote sputnik, would you do so? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:08 GMT
#1203
On May 20 2013 05:07 grush57 wrote: If you truly believe so marv, but I think he is a nub. A nub isn't an alignment though. Why are you voting Spicy? What is it that convinces you? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:15 GMT
#1208
On May 20 2013 05:14 iamperfection wrote: ![]() bet you a billion we're thinking exactly the same thing right now. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:24 GMT
#1218
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:31 GMT
#1227
yes? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:33 GMT
#1234
On May 20 2013 05:32 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 05:32 WaveofShadow wrote: Like is spicy actually liable to get lynched today based on this last minute pressure? unlikely. I'm not voting for him and neither is Marv, and we are this game's Power Couple incorrect, that's me and iamp. no, I'm talking about sputnik. I wanna kill him. It's been impossible to get a bunch of decent votes on him all game, which is a good sign. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:35 GMT
#1239
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:38 GMT
#1248
He hasn't backed down from anything he's said, he's fighting his corner. I remember him being much more aloof as mafia (LVII). This isn't a certain townread but I don't think he's done enough to be lynched today given his effort. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:41 GMT
#1254
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:42 GMT
#1257
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:43 GMT
#1258
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:45 GMT
#1261
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:46 GMT
#1267
On May 20 2013 05:45 raynpelikoneet wrote: They could be both scum, but GK fucking is scum. If someone puts a lot of "effort" to the game that does not mean he is town. You should lynch scum, not people who are bad/useless. I agree that sputnik is scummy, but he is just useless and i would expect more from GK at this point. Fortunately we get more than one lynch in the game | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:48 GMT
#1275
On May 20 2013 05:47 yamato77 wrote: If sputnik is town, he sure didn't try very hard to show us, did he? i thought you hated lynching lurkers. I mean i love lynching lurkers, but you hate it, no? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:50 GMT
#1277
On May 20 2013 05:50 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 05:48 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 05:47 yamato77 wrote: On May 20 2013 05:46 raynpelikoneet wrote: fuck you all if sputnik is town.. If sputnik is town, he sure didn't try very hard to show us, did he? i thought you hated lynching lurkers. I mean i love lynching lurkers, but you hate it, no? Did I not try to get us to lynch anyone else today? I'd still prefer Dandel, but I can't argue that sputnik is total trash. He's not a bad D1 lynch by any standard. ok, ok. Just thought I'd prod you and see what happened. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:56 GMT
#1286
If goodkarma is actually mafia, he'll still be mafia tomorrow and he'll actually still be posting enough for us to continue to develop our read on him. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 20:59 GMT
#1290
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:00 GMT
#1292
On May 20 2013 05:59 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 05:58 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 20 2013 05:56 marvellosity wrote: Day 1s, when we have the least information, is the best day to try to pick out mafia from the low-posters. I almost always follow this philosophy. If goodkarma is actually mafia, he'll still be mafia tomorrow and he'll actually still be posting enough for us to continue to develop our read on him. good point but this sputnik lynch is bullshit, its exactly what I said to watch out for earlier. A massive bandwagon at the last second. massive last second bandwagons are always good. shenannies for life true story. we just played in a game where we had a rather delightful one, and it was much more last minute than this. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:05 GMT
#1296
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:06 GMT
#1297
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:09 GMT
#1303
We'll get a mafia lynch tomorrow. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:32 GMT
#1320
On May 20 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 06:28 iamperfection wrote: On May 20 2013 06:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay so you are probably town, or both of you are scum. Which will be revealed at some point too, as one of you (if town) is gonna get killed. Can you now comment on GK, i remember you being useless in Carnival cruise, and you seem to follow the pattern here. marv, please post the mason logs before N1 ends. lol why is it only possible for them to be both town or both scum masons cant mason mafia One cant lie without the other knowing. Therefore they are mafia faking masons, or are both actually town. Sorry, what? Why can't BH be town and me mafia, or BH mafia and me town? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:37 GMT
#1323
On May 20 2013 06:34 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 06:32 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 20 2013 06:28 iamperfection wrote: On May 20 2013 06:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay so you are probably town, or both of you are scum. Which will be revealed at some point too, as one of you (if town) is gonna get killed. Can you now comment on GK, i remember you being useless in Carnival cruise, and you seem to follow the pattern here. marv, please post the mason logs before N1 ends. lol why is it only possible for them to be both town or both scum masons cant mason mafia One cant lie without the other knowing. Therefore they are mafia faking masons, or are both actually town. Sorry, what? Why can't BH be town and me mafia, or BH mafia and me town? because if you are actually both masons now then BH would have died if you were mafia, also known as a mismason. So he cannot be town and you mafia. If BH was mafia and said he masoned you, you would find out very quickly that he actually did not mason you. So BH mafia and you town is out the window too. Already explained why both of you mafia or both of you town is all that can happen. Why are you assuming things about mechanics? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:39 GMT
#1327
On May 20 2013 06:39 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 06:32 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 20 2013 06:28 iamperfection wrote: On May 20 2013 06:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay so you are probably town, or both of you are scum. Which will be revealed at some point too, as one of you (if town) is gonna get killed. Can you now comment on GK, i remember you being useless in Carnival cruise, and you seem to follow the pattern here. marv, please post the mason logs before N1 ends. lol why is it only possible for them to be both town or both scum masons cant mason mafia One cant lie without the other knowing. Therefore they are mafia faking masons, or are both actually town. Sorry, what? Why can't BH be town and me mafia, or BH mafia and me town? Do you really think the bolded part is possible? why not? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:40 GMT
#1328
On May 20 2013 06:38 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 06:37 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:34 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 20 2013 06:32 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 20 2013 06:28 iamperfection wrote: On May 20 2013 06:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay so you are probably town, or both of you are scum. Which will be revealed at some point too, as one of you (if town) is gonna get killed. Can you now comment on GK, i remember you being useless in Carnival cruise, and you seem to follow the pattern here. marv, please post the mason logs before N1 ends. lol why is it only possible for them to be both town or both scum masons cant mason mafia One cant lie without the other knowing. Therefore they are mafia faking masons, or are both actually town. Sorry, what? Why can't BH be town and me mafia, or BH mafia and me town? because if you are actually both masons now then BH would have died if you were mafia, also known as a mismason. So he cannot be town and you mafia. If BH was mafia and said he masoned you, you would find out very quickly that he actually did not mason you. So BH mafia and you town is out the window too. Already explained why both of you mafia or both of you town is all that can happen. Why are you assuming things about mechanics? im not assuming, I KNOW my mechanics. I base my entire fucking play off of mechanics and PRs. Mechanics change from game to game, so you can't "know" your mechanics. On TL it's totally standard for masons of either alignment to be able to successfully mason anybody. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:41 GMT
#1330
On May 20 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why would BH mason you as scum mason if you are town? Why take a risk? Because if he doesn't mason me, it's clear he's dodging. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:41 GMT
#1332
Quick example: Mad Men Mafia. I replaced in and VE mafia felt compelled to use his mason power to mason me, because he knew I'd find it suspicious as fuck if he didn't. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:42 GMT
#1333
On May 20 2013 06:41 VayneAuthority wrote: http://wiki.epicmafia.com/index.php?title=Mason this is what I know a mason to be. If people just change the meaning of roles freely on here then whatever, im wrong. yes, we're not epicmafia or mafiascum, we're TL ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:44 GMT
#1336
On May 20 2013 06:43 VayneAuthority wrote: Guess I will just stop talking then, like the 3rd time I have spammed the thread with useless stuff. be back when night kills flip. don't worry about it, you're just used to different shit than we are. No reason to abandon the thread broski <3 | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:45 GMT
#1337
On May 20 2013 06:44 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 06:41 marvellosity wrote: if BH is town, I am clearly the most obvious target to mason, by a stretch. so by extension, the same is true if he's mafia. Quick example: Mad Men Mafia. I replaced in and VE mafia felt compelled to use his mason power to mason me, because he knew I'd find it suspicious as fuck if he didn't. If BH is mafia, in your scenario here, i think his whole claiming a mason falls apart. It makes no sense. explain? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:54 GMT
#1342
On May 20 2013 06:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 06:45 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:44 raynpelikoneet wrote: On May 20 2013 06:41 marvellosity wrote: if BH is town, I am clearly the most obvious target to mason, by a stretch. so by extension, the same is true if he's mafia. Quick example: Mad Men Mafia. I replaced in and VE mafia felt compelled to use his mason power to mason me, because he knew I'd find it suspicious as fuck if he didn't. If BH is mafia, in your scenario here, i think his whole claiming a mason falls apart. It makes no sense. explain? Okay, let's say you are town and BH mafia: - BH unnecessarily claims mason. That will be confirmed at some point. - You say BH knows he needs to mason you. Makes sense. - If he is scum mason, why claim mason when he is not even really lynched yet? You can figure out his alignment on N1, you can figure out his scumbuddies. - Why not just buss a lesser scum (as BH is kinda good as scum right?) and earn credit for someone if you are "about to get lynched", as opposed to possibly outing more than one scum on N1? Claiming mason when he did was suboptimal from either a mafia or town perspective. Yet you're discounting one and not the other. What's the town explanation for BH claiming mason? He panicked and wanted the votes off him. What's the mafia explanation for BH claiming mason? He panicked and wanted the votes off him. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 21:59 GMT
#1349
On May 20 2013 06:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 06:54 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: On May 20 2013 06:45 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:44 raynpelikoneet wrote: On May 20 2013 06:41 marvellosity wrote: if BH is town, I am clearly the most obvious target to mason, by a stretch. so by extension, the same is true if he's mafia. Quick example: Mad Men Mafia. I replaced in and VE mafia felt compelled to use his mason power to mason me, because he knew I'd find it suspicious as fuck if he didn't. If BH is mafia, in your scenario here, i think his whole claiming a mason falls apart. It makes no sense. explain? Okay, let's say you are town and BH mafia: - BH unnecessarily claims mason. That will be confirmed at some point. - You say BH knows he needs to mason you. Makes sense. - If he is scum mason, why claim mason when he is not even really lynched yet? You can figure out his alignment on N1, you can figure out his scumbuddies. - Why not just buss a lesser scum (as BH is kinda good as scum right?) and earn credit for someone if you are "about to get lynched", as opposed to possibly outing more than one scum on N1? Claiming mason when he did was suboptimal from either a mafia or town perspective. Yet you're discounting one and not the other. What's the town explanation for BH claiming mason? He panicked and wanted the votes off him. What's the mafia explanation for BH claiming mason? He panicked and wanted the votes off him. Claiming mason is not relevant. If he was town/scum he probably thought he was gonna get lynched and that does not tell anything about his alignment. There is no other reason to claim mason when he did. What i said after that first line is however relevant. No, all your subsequent lines are "why did he claim mason instead of doing something else" because he panicked. same for both alignments. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 22:00 GMT
#1350
On May 20 2013 06:57 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 06:54 iamperfection wrote: but why did he vote sputnik he didn't need to and would know he was town if dandel were scum You mean DI? I know why, because GK is scum. That's a terrible reason, sputnik was lynched with or without Dandel's vote. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 22:03 GMT
#1353
On May 20 2013 07:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 06:59 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: On May 20 2013 06:54 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: On May 20 2013 06:45 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:44 raynpelikoneet wrote: On May 20 2013 06:41 marvellosity wrote: if BH is town, I am clearly the most obvious target to mason, by a stretch. so by extension, the same is true if he's mafia. Quick example: Mad Men Mafia. I replaced in and VE mafia felt compelled to use his mason power to mason me, because he knew I'd find it suspicious as fuck if he didn't. If BH is mafia, in your scenario here, i think his whole claiming a mason falls apart. It makes no sense. explain? Okay, let's say you are town and BH mafia: - BH unnecessarily claims mason. That will be confirmed at some point. - You say BH knows he needs to mason you. Makes sense. - If he is scum mason, why claim mason when he is not even really lynched yet? You can figure out his alignment on N1, you can figure out his scumbuddies. - Why not just buss a lesser scum (as BH is kinda good as scum right?) and earn credit for someone if you are "about to get lynched", as opposed to possibly outing more than one scum on N1? Claiming mason when he did was suboptimal from either a mafia or town perspective. Yet you're discounting one and not the other. What's the town explanation for BH claiming mason? He panicked and wanted the votes off him. What's the mafia explanation for BH claiming mason? He panicked and wanted the votes off him. Claiming mason is not relevant. If he was town/scum he probably thought he was gonna get lynched and that does not tell anything about his alignment. There is no other reason to claim mason when he did. What i said after that first line is however relevant. No, all your subsequent lines are "why did he claim mason instead of doing something else" because he panicked. same for both alignments. Yes but if he panicked as scum he would not claim mason if you were town. He would do something else. There is literally no reason (if he thought he, or other scum was gonna get lynched on D1) to make the game harder for your team. Just accept your fate and hope you play better next time. Damn you marv, you are supposed to be good at this shit, why are you so bad now? Your alternative was "bus a scumbuddy". That's not a good alternative. People always call me bad in arguments like this and it's rarely because I'm being bad. Just saying. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 22:09 GMT
#1356
On May 20 2013 07:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 07:03 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 07:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: On May 20 2013 06:59 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: On May 20 2013 06:54 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: On May 20 2013 06:45 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 06:44 raynpelikoneet wrote: On May 20 2013 06:41 marvellosity wrote: if BH is town, I am clearly the most obvious target to mason, by a stretch. so by extension, the same is true if he's mafia. Quick example: Mad Men Mafia. I replaced in and VE mafia felt compelled to use his mason power to mason me, because he knew I'd find it suspicious as fuck if he didn't. If BH is mafia, in your scenario here, i think his whole claiming a mason falls apart. It makes no sense. explain? Okay, let's say you are town and BH mafia: - BH unnecessarily claims mason. That will be confirmed at some point. - You say BH knows he needs to mason you. Makes sense. - If he is scum mason, why claim mason when he is not even really lynched yet? You can figure out his alignment on N1, you can figure out his scumbuddies. - Why not just buss a lesser scum (as BH is kinda good as scum right?) and earn credit for someone if you are "about to get lynched", as opposed to possibly outing more than one scum on N1? Claiming mason when he did was suboptimal from either a mafia or town perspective. Yet you're discounting one and not the other. What's the town explanation for BH claiming mason? He panicked and wanted the votes off him. What's the mafia explanation for BH claiming mason? He panicked and wanted the votes off him. Claiming mason is not relevant. If he was town/scum he probably thought he was gonna get lynched and that does not tell anything about his alignment. There is no other reason to claim mason when he did. What i said after that first line is however relevant. No, all your subsequent lines are "why did he claim mason instead of doing something else" because he panicked. same for both alignments. Yes but if he panicked as scum he would not claim mason if you were town. He would do something else. There is literally no reason (if he thought he, or other scum was gonna get lynched on D1) to make the game harder for your team. Just accept your fate and hope you play better next time. Damn you marv, you are supposed to be good at this shit, why are you so bad now? Your alternative was "bus a scumbuddy". That's not a good alternative. People always call me bad in arguments like this and it's rarely because I'm being bad. Just saying. Blarf... What are you doing. First you say "BH panicked". Now you say "bussing a scumbuddy is no good alternative". If BH panicked, he thought he was gonna get lynched right? BH is supposed to be a good scum player right? Why is bussing not a good alternative? Because losing a mafia is never a good alternative unless absolutely necessary. If he's scum mason, he can claim mason and his alignment isn't provable one way or another, and it averts the lynch like it absolutely did. No-one has ever called BH a good scumplayer btw. He's always dead by day 2-3 latest. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 22:13 GMT
#1357
I'm just saying that BH could plausibly have done what he did as either alignment. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 22:17 GMT
#1359
On May 20 2013 07:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: What i am trying to say is this: Try to look at this from his perspective. If he is scum, he clearly panicked and claimed his role because he thought he was gonna get lynched (as otherwise there is no reason to claim). He knows he needs to mason you on N1. That is a big big nono if you are town (which BH would know if he is scum and you town) as you might be able to catch not one, but more scum on that phase. Why the fuck would BH claim mason if he is mafia and you are town? You say people do not call him a good scum player, even more reasons to not get in a one phase debate with you dontcha think? You're attributing a level of foresight and thought to someone who panic-claimed. see the issue? If you're panicking and roleclaiming when it absolutely isn't even necessary, it's highly unlikely you're thinking "if i do this, i'll have to mason marv night 1 and talk to him there and it'll be really difficult". Because if he was capable of making that logical train of thought in that moment he wouldn't have been claiming at all (as either alignment!) | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 22:24 GMT
#1362
On May 20 2013 07:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 07:17 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 07:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: What i am trying to say is this: Try to look at this from his perspective. If he is scum, he clearly panicked and claimed his role because he thought he was gonna get lynched (as otherwise there is no reason to claim). He knows he needs to mason you on N1. That is a big big nono if you are town (which BH would know if he is scum and you town) as you might be able to catch not one, but more scum on that phase. Why the fuck would BH claim mason if he is mafia and you are town? You say people do not call him a good scum player, even more reasons to not get in a one phase debate with you dontcha think? You're attributing a level of foresight and thought to someone who panic-claimed. see the issue? If you're panicking and roleclaiming when it absolutely isn't even necessary, it's highly unlikely you're thinking "if i do this, i'll have to mason marv night 1 and talk to him there and it'll be really difficult". Because if he was capable of making that logical train of thought in that moment he wouldn't have been claiming at all (as either alignment!) And we come back to my original argument: 1) BH is town and you are town - makes sense, townies do dumb stuff/posts/claims more likely than mafia 2) BH is town and you are mafia - makes sense as above 3) BH is mafia and you are mafia - brilliant scum play, and btw, you need to post the mason logs before N1 ends 4) BH is mafia and you are town - mafia has time to think about their actions. claiming is an action that is well-thought out, at least if you are not a complete newb. Who is to say BH (if mafia) did not think about what he is doing before doing so? I see this #4 scenario is impossible, because he is hurting his team with his action. this is where it's breaking down. with the greatest of respect to BH, who I don't actually think is a particularly terrible scumplayer, I also absolutely think he's capable of panicking as mafia and doing what he did, and you don't, and that's what it boils down to. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 22:26 GMT
#1363
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 22:32 GMT
#1366
GK and Dandel I'll work more on this nightphase. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 22:32 GMT
#1367
On May 20 2013 07:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: EBWOP: Show nested quote + But after all, i do not think BH would claim when he did if he was mafia and you were town. ..because he would at least have discussed with his team how to handle the situation if it seemed like a situation where there is no outs other than a claim. not if he was panicking. see how circular this is? ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 19 2013 22:39 GMT
#1369
:OOOOOO Anyway, people I'm reasonably confident are town at this stage are me, iamp, DP, yamato, and probably you. Secondary townreads are Vayne, Spicy, grush, maybe Wave? Realistically anyone not in the initial few names are fair game, and the alive ones I've not mentioned are even more fair game. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 09:37 GMT
#1534
On May 20 2013 13:29 s0Lstice wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 13:24 Blazinghand wrote: On May 20 2013 13:22 s0Lstice wrote: On May 20 2013 13:15 DarthPunk wrote: On May 20 2013 13:08 s0Lstice wrote: On May 20 2013 13:07 DarthPunk wrote: On May 20 2013 13:05 s0Lstice wrote: DP, trying to think through this. You are saying this slip means BH is a scum masoner? Yep. Why would he then say that he would be confirmed town after X nights when he knows that we are all aware that this is a closed set-up with the possibility of any role in play...even scum masoner? Because scum masoners are rare and he is trying to leverage his role into town cred. Remember his mason claim is all that saved him and most of us were operating under the assumption that he was town mason. Also people say confirmed town all the time for stupid reasons. I choose to view it as meaningless posturing. Yea I get the leverage argument...but I'm saying there is no leverage to be had since we all have discussed the closed set-up. Rare or not, its in play, so the town has to consider it. Like, we already have talked about how the mason claim isn't alignment indicative. I suppose it makes sense though. It also proves BH hasn't been reading the thread. If he had been diving filters, he'd know there aren't just 12 players (and hence 3 scum as per normal), and that assumption would not have arisen. Assuming I'm town, it proves I haven't been reading the thread. If you think it's a legit scumslip, it says nothing about whether or not I'm reading the thread. Yes it does. Scum BH would not have claimed to be confirmed town after 3 nights if he had been reading the thread. We are all factoring in the possibility of a scum mason. Just catching up on all this now. I disagree with this in particular. Another player on this forum, Toadesstern, is legendary for claiming 'confirmed town' status for his non-alignment indicative power roles and/or pushes. It's something he almost exclusively does as town, so characterising this in particular as a mafia trait seems not correct. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 09:44 GMT
#1535
On May 20 2013 17:31 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 17:26 yamato77 wrote: You forgetting about the scum masoner possibility does seem like something a scum player wouldn't do. I want to know more about your reads before I write you off. For starters, tell me why you masoned marv. Basically, I came into night 1 with 3 big townreads: DP, Marv, and (to an extent) Iamp. I decided I needed to mason someone who A) is almost certainly town and B) I can work well with. A) is because I want it to be clear I was in fact a masoner. B) is so that, well, I'm using my skill in a worthwhile way. I decided that since the Iamp read is based on meta, and DP and I rarely interact well, I'd be best off going with Marv. Admittedly there was a risk to it since Marv and I have clashed once or twice recently (LXI), but Marv likes winning games of mafia more than he likes fighting with me, so I figured it was my best bet. +1, that IS basically my philosophy. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 09:53 GMT
#1536
Especially as earlier in the thread I specifically gave 12-4 and 11-4-1 as my assumptions. Like, in black and white like that. There's very little point in BH defending himself on this, because there isn't really a satisfactory explanation, he just has to try find mafia and that's it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:07 GMT
#1538
+ Show Spoiler + On May 16 2013 21:53 Vivax wrote: I'm currently looking at B and J and they are close to each other, they are basically already in a pair, any idea on how they should move ideally? On May 16 2013 21:58 marvellosity wrote: What? How does it even matter when people don't know what letter they are? ...... On May 16 2013 21:59 marvellosity wrote: is that a scumslip? On May 17 2013 06:06 Crossfire99 wrote: Vivax the Weeping Angel has been lynched! | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:08 GMT
#1539
On May 20 2013 19:07 DarthPunk wrote: So marv. You think he slipped or not? I think so, but I don't have your legendary decisiveness ![]() Given BlazingHand has made a 1000 word case on his confirmed town mason partner before, I don't put it past him as town either. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:18 GMT
#1542
The problem with it is as you mention; it's actually not mindboggling weird or dumb, it's just 'off' and implies extra information. But could a town Blazing also have gone "derp it's a mini, there's 3 mafia"? maybe too. I'm going to not think about Blazing's alignment for the rest of night 1 / first half of day 2 (if I'm alive, naturally) and try to find mafia in the rest of the people. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:19 GMT
#1543
On May 20 2013 19:18 DarthPunk wrote: Just as an aside. I'd like a medic to flip a coin and then prot one of myself or marv. yeah, that's how i always end up dying day 1. :< I think the only time i've ever been protected on day 1 was a) when I'm mafia or b) Personality 2. ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:32 GMT
#1547
On May 20 2013 19:31 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 19:28 DarthPunk wrote: On May 20 2013 19:18 marvellosity wrote: It's funny, but you rather get my point. Sometimes Blazing catches a bunch of mafia, sometimes he does something so mindblowing you can't even comprehend it. The problem with it is as you mention; it's actually not mindboggling weird or dumb, it's just 'off' and implies extra information. But could a town Blazing also have gone "derp it's a mini, there's 3 mafia"? maybe too. I'm going to not think about Blazing's alignment for the rest of night 1 / first half of day 2 (if I'm alive, naturally) and try to find mafia in the rest of the people. It's not just the slip. It's the posts immediately after that. He is scum and needs to die. No question. No excuses. Just lynch the shit out of him. On May 20 2013 19:19 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 19:18 DarthPunk wrote: Just as an aside. I'd like a medic to flip a coin and then prot one of myself or marv. yeah, that's how i always end up dying day 1. :< I think the only time i've ever been protected on day 1 was a) when I'm mafia or b) Personality 2. ![]() I died in 24 hours in my last game. I want that medic prot. Both you and I are a good save though. Like the fact that I am pretty chill and casual and also advocate strongly for my beliefs is not imo a scumtell. Everything I've posted has had a reasonable or hilarious explanation that is as or more reasonable than the scum-based explantion you're been pushing. If you want to refute my individual points, I'll be glad to argue this again with you after I get some sleep. But really man I don't think you have a leg to stand on there. No. I only want to know who is mafia, another argument about it will achieve literally nothing. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:34 GMT
#1549
I can't bear reading another 5 pages that will say exactly the same things as the past 5 we had on the matter. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:36 GMT
#1553
plz ermahgerrd stahp | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:36 GMT
#1555
On May 20 2013 19:36 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 19:34 marvellosity wrote: Fine. DP, stop prodding BH and let him do his thing. I can't bear reading another 5 pages that will say exactly the same things as the past 5 we had on the matter. I'm not even talking to blazinghand. I am talking to you. Because if I die I want you to fucking lynch him. And if you die I will fucking lynch him. Well, then talk to me when BH is in bed ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:37 GMT
#1556
i'm stifling a giggle at work at the thought. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:43 GMT
#1558
On May 20 2013 19:40 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 19:37 marvellosity wrote: lol DP. you always "fucking" lynch someone. i'm stifling a giggle at work at the thought. Yeah. I swear to much. I'm Australian. you look so cute and cuddly in your skype pic too. <3 | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:51 GMT
#1561
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 10:57 GMT
#1565
On May 20 2013 19:57 DarthPunk wrote: Hey marv. Are you scum? Of course. What took you so long? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 11:03 GMT
#1567
On May 20 2013 20:01 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 19:57 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 19:57 DarthPunk wrote: Hey marv. Are you scum? Of course. What took you so long? OK the only game I can remember marv and I NOT going at each others throats in is GSL III in which marv was scum. Every other game that marv and I have been into together we have fought tooth and nail and marv has been town. Like I do have a town read on marv. But why are we not fighting constantly? Because I almost made you quit mafia? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 11:05 GMT
#1568
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 11:06 GMT
#1570
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 11:36 GMT
#1572
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 11:44 GMT
#1574
On May 20 2013 20:41 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't think he has done much overall.. A lot of one liners and chatting which is not game relevant (or at least finding scum -relevant). The only thing he has is his list, where he calls solstice town and me null when we have same scumreads. I still fail to see how my/his activity has anything to do with that? The point of the game is telling who is mafia and lyncihng them. You don't need a 10 page filter to do so as iamp seems to assume you do. iamp plays mafia very simply. Are they trying? Are they scumhunting? In his opinion s0lstice had been trying harder than you, which is a tick in the town box that you didn't have. There's a reason only you seem to give a shit about this point. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 12:05 GMT
#1576
iamp is also pretty scared as mafia and I find it close to impossible he'd have 10 pages of activity so far if he were mafia. You should look somewhere else because you're on the wrong path here. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 12:20 GMT
#1581
On May 20 2013 19:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: I'm all in for lynching BH. His post about 3 scum seems like a slip and i can't see his follow up after that coming from a townie. Also this is a post that raised red flags on him earlier: By the way, doesn't this mean that my theory you were arguing against earlier is likely correct? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 12:28 GMT
#1583
On May 20 2013 21:25 raynpelikoneet wrote: What do you mean? It means that BH is mafia and panicked claiming mason and was forced to mason me, which you were telling me was stupid. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 13:19 GMT
#1588
On May 20 2013 22:14 s0Lstice wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 18:37 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 13:29 s0Lstice wrote: On May 20 2013 13:24 Blazinghand wrote: On May 20 2013 13:22 s0Lstice wrote: On May 20 2013 13:15 DarthPunk wrote: On May 20 2013 13:08 s0Lstice wrote: On May 20 2013 13:07 DarthPunk wrote: On May 20 2013 13:05 s0Lstice wrote: DP, trying to think through this. You are saying this slip means BH is a scum masoner? Yep. Why would he then say that he would be confirmed town after X nights when he knows that we are all aware that this is a closed set-up with the possibility of any role in play...even scum masoner? Because scum masoners are rare and he is trying to leverage his role into town cred. Remember his mason claim is all that saved him and most of us were operating under the assumption that he was town mason. Also people say confirmed town all the time for stupid reasons. I choose to view it as meaningless posturing. Yea I get the leverage argument...but I'm saying there is no leverage to be had since we all have discussed the closed set-up. Rare or not, its in play, so the town has to consider it. Like, we already have talked about how the mason claim isn't alignment indicative. I suppose it makes sense though. It also proves BH hasn't been reading the thread. If he had been diving filters, he'd know there aren't just 12 players (and hence 3 scum as per normal), and that assumption would not have arisen. Assuming I'm town, it proves I haven't been reading the thread. If you think it's a legit scumslip, it says nothing about whether or not I'm reading the thread. Yes it does. Scum BH would not have claimed to be confirmed town after 3 nights if he had been reading the thread. We are all factoring in the possibility of a scum mason. Just catching up on all this now. I disagree with this in particular. Another player on this forum, Toadesstern, is legendary for claiming 'confirmed town' status for his non-alignment indicative power roles and/or pushes. It's something he almost exclusively does as town, so characterising this in particular as a mafia trait seems not correct. I wasn't arguing for it as a mafia trait... BH claimed to be confirmed town after three nights. I said in that quote that scum BH would not have claimed to be confirmed town after 3 nights. At that point we were arguing about whether it proves, as either alignment, that BH wasn't reading the thread. I said it proves scum BH hasn't been reading the thread because a scum mason should be keenly aware of what confirms and doesn't confirm him. He wouldn't attempt to dictate to the rest of the thread something that in fact would NOT confirm him, especially considering we have been actively talking about the closed set-up and the possibility of scum masons. Whether you agree with that or not is a different story (but I'll guess no ;D ). I'm slightly confused and it's probably not very important, so good stuff, sir. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 13:46 GMT
#1591
On May 20 2013 22:39 JarJarDrinks wrote: All caught up. So BH scumslipped? I'm shocked. /end sarcasm FWIW, I don't it's unreasonable to think that DP is bussing here. He's trying to gain town cred for a lynch that almost happened yesterday. If they thought that BH was most likely gonna get lynched or vigged, it'd be a pretty good scum play IMO. I'm not saying I definately think it's true, but DP "catching" BH in scumslip when there are already several people suspecting BH doesn't make me think DP is any more likely to be town. Why on earth would you put forward the theory that DP is bussing? There's zero indication in your filter thus far that you think DP is suspicious. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 14:05 GMT
#1594
On May 20 2013 22:56 JarJarDrinks wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 22:46 marvellosity wrote: On May 20 2013 22:39 JarJarDrinks wrote: All caught up. So BH scumslipped? I'm shocked. /end sarcasm FWIW, I don't it's unreasonable to think that DP is bussing here. He's trying to gain town cred for a lynch that almost happened yesterday. If they thought that BH was most likely gonna get lynched or vigged, it'd be a pretty good scum play IMO. I'm not saying I definately think it's true, but DP "catching" BH in scumslip when there are already several people suspecting BH doesn't make me think DP is any more likely to be town. Why on earth would you put forward the theory that DP is bussing? There's zero indication in your filter thus far that you think DP is suspicious. Well for starters I've been trying to push for a BH lynch all game. But DP still has me as a top scumread despite basically saying that he's 100% sure BH is scum. He earlier accused me of being a scummie that's too attached to my badwagon. You would think he'd back off me a bit since he supposedly believes that the guy I've been bandwagoning is scum. So if DP is potentially mafia bussing BH, same could be true of you on Day 1, right? Like "gosh darnit, everyone believes the claim, but I still think he's mafia!" Looks good if BH later flips mafia, right? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 14:40 GMT
#1605
On May 20 2013 23:37 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 22:39 JarJarDrinks wrote: All caught up. So BH scumslipped? I'm shocked. /end sarcasm FWIW, I don't it's unreasonable to think that DP is bussing here. He's trying to gain town cred for a lynch that almost happened yesterday. If they thought that BH was most likely gonna get lynched or vigged, it'd be a pretty good scum play IMO. I'm not saying I definately think it's true, but DP "catching" BH in scumslip when there are already several people suspecting BH doesn't make me think DP is any more likely to be town. This guy knows BH is scum. There is no doubt. and he is trying to make me look bad or something when BH flips red. I don't give a fuck if it's association before the flip. Lynch this guy after BH. also. Since when does JJD say FWIW. I know blazinghand says that though. This is almost as silly as me saying you were making the wrong jokes | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 14:42 GMT
#1607
On May 20 2013 23:41 DarthPunk wrote: Also I don't care who you have/haven't pushed you are independently scummy despite blazing hands alignment. You think JJD came out of the gate bussing his experienced mafiabuddy? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 14:57 GMT
#1620
On May 20 2013 23:57 Dandel Ion wrote: No, it's accurate There's been a lot going on since you last posted... | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 15:12 GMT
#1631
On May 21 2013 00:11 WaveofShadow wrote: ohai guise, I back. DP why are we lynching BH tomorrow and not Dandel? I suggest you read the thread before asking inane questions | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 15:26 GMT
#1637
On May 21 2013 00:15 WaveofShadow wrote: No I read the slip, but despite BH's actions the fact that you are still completely 100% sure that he is scum doesn't make sense to me when we fucking Dandel just fucking taunting us all game. Do you think taunting is a good mafia tactic? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 15:35 GMT
#1643
On May 21 2013 00:29 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 00:26 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 00:15 WaveofShadow wrote: No I read the slip, but despite BH's actions the fact that you are still completely 100% sure that he is scum doesn't make sense to me when we fucking Dandel just fucking taunting us all game. Do you think taunting is a good mafia tactic? Do you think his behaviour has in any way indicated that he is playing for the town? wasn't my question | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 15:38 GMT
#1645
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 16:00 GMT
#1650
On May 21 2013 00:45 WaveofShadow wrote: Helpful, thanks. So you feel that shutting down my line of questioning is the most effective way to be playing right now? That's either scum action right there or you have some other reason for finding my questioning useless. I assume you're not going to explain what that is, either? Why are you afraid to engage me in discussion, marv? Sweetie, I'll never be afraid to engage you in discussion. My point is "is he being a good little townie" is a different question to "is this guy mafia". That's the distinction I was trying to get at with my question (which you didn't understand by your counter-question). If you're struggling to see the town motivation in 'taunting' town as town, there's very little mafia motivation for it either, because it brings attention on yourself. Typical mafia MO is to blend in using whatever chosen method; usually "taunting" is not one, but your post said (to paraphrase) "why aren't we lynching dandel for taunting us, the taunting is more convincing as a mafia trait than BH's scumslip + reactions". If all townies always played proper town-like, the game of mafia would be exceptionally easy. Ok? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 16:11 GMT
#1653
On May 21 2013 01:05 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 01:00 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 00:45 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 21 2013 00:38 marvellosity wrote: Probably not, no. Helpful, thanks. So you feel that shutting down my line of questioning is the most effective way to be playing right now? That's either scum action right there or you have some other reason for finding my questioning useless. I assume you're not going to explain what that is, either? Why are you afraid to engage me in discussion, marv? Sweetie, I'll never be afraid to engage you in discussion. My point is "is he being a good little townie" is a different question to "is this guy mafia". That's the distinction I was trying to get at with my question (which you didn't understand by your counter-question). If you're struggling to see the town motivation in 'taunting' town as town, there's very little mafia motivation for it either, because it brings attention on yourself. Typical mafia MO is to blend in using whatever chosen method; usually "taunting" is not one, but your post said (to paraphrase) "why aren't we lynching dandel for taunting us, the taunting is more convincing as a mafia trait than BH's scumslip + reactions". If all townies always played proper town-like, the game of mafia would be exceptionally easy. Ok? What, then, are your thoughts on Dandel right now? We have so much shit in this town doing nothing and the only one you seem to find it in your heart to defend is Dandel. Is it because you believe him to be town? I feel like I have no idea what you're up to, marv. You do engage people in discussion and ask all sorts of questions but I don't know what you think of people. The irony of it is, if it *wasn't* Dandel, I'd be quite confident his slot was town, because antagonistic, blaze players are usually town. But because it is Dandel, I'm not so sure about that read. I went over his filter earlier, and other than the weird shit-fest with me, I didn't find much particularly upsetting. His reads kinda make sense, and they are actually evolved and explained if you look past some of the weirdness. Quite a lot depends on how he performs on Day 2 I guess. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 16:49 GMT
#1659
On May 21 2013 01:45 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 01:11 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 01:05 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 21 2013 01:00 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 00:45 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 21 2013 00:38 marvellosity wrote: Probably not, no. Helpful, thanks. So you feel that shutting down my line of questioning is the most effective way to be playing right now? That's either scum action right there or you have some other reason for finding my questioning useless. I assume you're not going to explain what that is, either? Why are you afraid to engage me in discussion, marv? Sweetie, I'll never be afraid to engage you in discussion. My point is "is he being a good little townie" is a different question to "is this guy mafia". That's the distinction I was trying to get at with my question (which you didn't understand by your counter-question). If you're struggling to see the town motivation in 'taunting' town as town, there's very little mafia motivation for it either, because it brings attention on yourself. Typical mafia MO is to blend in using whatever chosen method; usually "taunting" is not one, but your post said (to paraphrase) "why aren't we lynching dandel for taunting us, the taunting is more convincing as a mafia trait than BH's scumslip + reactions". If all townies always played proper town-like, the game of mafia would be exceptionally easy. Ok? What, then, are your thoughts on Dandel right now? We have so much shit in this town doing nothing and the only one you seem to find it in your heart to defend is Dandel. Is it because you believe him to be town? I feel like I have no idea what you're up to, marv. You do engage people in discussion and ask all sorts of questions but I don't know what you think of people. The irony of it is, if it *wasn't* Dandel, I'd be quite confident his slot was town, because antagonistic, blaze players are usually town. But because it is Dandel, I'm not so sure about that read. I went over his filter earlier, and other than the weird shit-fest with me, I didn't find much particularly upsetting. His reads kinda make sense, and they are actually evolved and explained if you look past some of the weirdness. Quite a lot depends on how he performs on Day 2 I guess. I very clearly pointed out how this is blatantly not true, Marv. You got some 'splainin' to do. No, you made a post trumpeting your own opinion which you now hold to be 100% true even though it's totally subjective to you and contains gems such as "dandel doesn't sheep" when he sheeps multiple times each game as town. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 17:00 GMT
#1664
On May 21 2013 01:55 yamato77 wrote: I mean, if Dandel were town, wouldn't you expect him to be playing differently? Doesn't Dandel usually have strong opinions as town? I'm not saying he never sheeps, but doesn't it seems off to you that he's been playing "follow the Marv" the whole game? Do you think he's been playing "follow the marv"? He had GK as a scumread when I never did, and I had vague suspicions of JJD, but his were significantly more explained than mine ever were (which were general meta activity). How did Dandel make his scumreads in British 2? I would say he's explained his scumreads here quite a bit more than he did there. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 17:17 GMT
#1666
On May 21 2013 02:10 yamato77 wrote: His suspicion on JJD is not well-explained by any stretch of the imagination. Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:46 Dandel Ion wrote: JJD looks like a decent lynch. I'd sheep that. Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 09:55 Dandel Ion wrote: I'm mainly interested in lynching jjd and gk atm. What has been said about jdd has been said, and he hasn't said anything. Yeah, no. This struck me as a valid point (perhaps because he was partially agreeing with me...) On May 18 2013 20:31 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 19:18 marvellosity wrote: One other thing - something I don't like that both WoS and JarJar are doing is complaining about thread activity. That riles me quite a bit. Especially with WoS, given how posty he usually is himself. This actually interesting, since they do it only 10 minutes apart from each other. I think if they were both scum, they'd be more self-conscious about things like that and, if not not say it at all (since it sounds scummy as hell), at least space it out a little? That's a scumtell on JJD mainly, I'd say. He's hinding his scummery behind the posts of somebody else. He also made it sound like he's not complaining when he totally was complaining. And this is a pretty devious post construction if he's mafia: On May 19 2013 21:00 Dandel Ion wrote: I found it weird people were backing off jjd for no good reason/while keeping him in their "scum/would lynch" pile, so, trying to make sense of shit I decided to do a jjd counter! JJD Counter: Spicy voting him and confusing his name with WoS solstice defending him BH saying he would lynch jjd ^DP trying to lynch BH for that everyone else deflecting on BH GK saying he would like to lynch jjd, yet votes BH in accordance with ^ JJD COUNTER DISCONTINUED BECAUSE GK CLAIMED SCUM GG ##Unvote ##Vote Goodkarma | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 17:24 GMT
#1668
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 18:57 GMT
#1680
On May 21 2013 03:55 raynpelikoneet wrote: The problem is if marv is scum nobody has balls to lynch him other than me & yamato. yes, this is a very silly post. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 19:14 GMT
#1686
On May 21 2013 04:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 03:57 iamperfection wrote: if there's anyone who wouldn't take more pleasure in lynching a scum marv it would be me. Dandel would love doing bh would love doing it. Signs point to a town marv at this moment he should be protected. There is noone in thread that can't possibly be scum other than yamato for me. And i remember Dandel's retarded comments from Red where he stated that marv can't be lynched on D1 so it's not worth looking into him. So no, i don't think Dandel would lynch marv. Dunno about you and BH. You however have a point in marv/BH mason thing (i guess you are referring to that?). Assuming BH is scum marv would be valuable as town, but still.. yamato is the towniest guy in thread. so you made a completely baseless assertion? excellent. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 19:17 GMT
#1689
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 19:36 GMT
#1695
Here's his 2nd post in the game here, which I'll spoiler: + Show Spoiler + On May 18 2013 06:47 goodkarma wrote: I feel that Stutters's play so far has been scummy. First, he completely contradicts himself about his thoughts on meta: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote: On May 18 2013 03:01 s0Lstice wrote: the fact that i've only ever played town is a pretty important piece of information to share for people who don't know me/haven't played with me. getting my share on, don't hate Maybe I'm reading to much into this but I'm wondering why you want people to focus on your meta? Let's say I tell you this is like my 13th game without rolling scum. What does that tell you about my play this game that you'd consider important at all right now? So he doesn't feel meta's important here. But: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 03:19 Stutters695 wrote: On May 18 2013 03:07 DarthPunk wrote: On May 18 2013 03:06 s0Lstice wrote: On May 18 2013 03:04 DarthPunk wrote: On May 18 2013 03:02 s0Lstice wrote: stutters, you got any scum games you can quickly point me to save me some time? OOHHH Let me. As town, He lurks but sometimes says useful things. As scum, He lurks. Ohhh but not this time, according to him. Stutters you are forbidden to lurk. Not the first, nor the last time that phrase will be heard in this forum. Excellent summary of my town play. That fabled scum game is still waiting to happen though. When it comes to excusing his lurky play, it matters. Also, I found this to be scummy: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 06:00 Stutters695 wrote: Right now I could get behind a Vayne lynch. vayne how many games have you played (on TL and in general if you've played on other sites)? In other words, he's ready to sheep onto a Vayne lynch bandwaggon if it gains momentum. But he doesn't want to draw atttention to himself by putting down a vote. #Vote: Stutters I look forward to Stutters's response. If it is to be believed he's sometimes useful as town, then that's another scumtell as he's been nothing but useless thus far. Here's a couple of things he said in The Game. On March 17 2013 05:31 goodkarma wrote: @Mr. Wiggles: Show nested quote + On March 17 2013 04:32 Mr. Wiggles wrote: On March 17 2013 03:53 goodkarma wrote: On March 17 2013 02:46 Coagulation wrote: The sast thing was clearly a joke. It was like an hour into day 1 and there was no one posting. You can just expect to be nailing scum 1 hour into day 1 when 90% of players havnt posted. thats fucking absurd. so omg someone makes a joke post to pass the time. Okay. I can understand it was early. But if we were to look in the here and now you still haven't provided anything that suggests who you think could be scum. I think what peashooter, and others here are getting at, is either post something that helps us scumhunt, or don't post at all. I am less inclined than others here to just policy lynch you. But you make it hard for us when you continue to spam the thread with emotional OMGUS responses. Hopefully you see where we're coming from. I would be most interested in hearing about your read on Grey. What are your own reads for scum? You've mentioned twice the need to scumhunt, and here you're chiding Coag for not providing anything in regards to who he thinks is scum, when you yourself have done the same. It's just more of the same general game play talk with no actual stances taken in regards to your own opinions. ##Vote: goodkarma Convince me you're not scum. Sowy, but I'm not giving you any scumreads until I'm ready to. You claim I haven't been scumhunting, but if you were to look at my posting so far I have: 1) Worked towards establishing a pro-town atmosphere, a reasonable early goal 2) Been pushing others for reads to get a better understanding of their motives and thought process, which is very important to getting scumreads As far as cases go, which aren't the only component of scumhunting: As I said, when I'm ready. And I promise you it will be long before the end of the day. But what I'd recommend you to do right now is to focus some of your energies on getting others to participate (not everyone has even posted yet!), and pursue some of your other scumreads. Because tunneling one read, and going into lurker mode thereafter is in itself pretty scummy... On March 17 2013 09:15 goodkarma wrote: I will be presenting my own case before the evening's done, so everyone has a solid 24ish hours to look at it. But I typically don't like to jump into cases as quickly as some here. Call that scummy if you want, but it's my playstyle. Highlights in bold and red are mine. The bolds are self-explanatory, and I bolded the red to explain it slightly - goodkarma is saying in this passage that it's important to push people for their motivations and thought processes, and thinks it's very important. Here he makes an early case on Stutters (despite saying last town-game he doesn't make early cases) and he never talked to him first about his thought processes. I would note at the end of his post in this thread he says "I look forward to Stutters response". But if we're to take his posts in The Game at face value, goodkarma likes to play by getting responses FIRST, voting LATER. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 19:52 GMT
#1698
On May 21 2013 04:47 WaveofShadow wrote: Marv what would you suggest we do about GK if it seems BH is still mainly on the block tomorrow? Do you think its worth waiting some more to see what he comes up with or is he vig fodder? I don't think he's done anything since before the shitstorm with BH last night. I dunno. I think GK is mafia now though. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 19:53 GMT
#1699
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 20:22 GMT
#1703
On May 21 2013 05:15 Stutters695 wrote: Marv, although you're an obvious prot target, can we still expect your opinion of BH because of the mason QT before the flip? Very little has gone on there. I'll probably just copy/paste it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 20:27 GMT
#1706
On May 21 2013 05:25 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 05:22 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 05:15 Stutters695 wrote: Marv, although you're an obvious prot target, can we still expect your opinion of BH because of the mason QT before the flip? Very little has gone on there. I'll probably just copy/paste it. I somehow thought that was going to be the case at the start of the night phase. And i still don't get why people assume it's better to mason a townread of yours instead of scum/null if you are town. Townies are more likely to share their opinion in thread, you can basically interact with them in thread. Scum are likely to slip up when they have to deal with the thread/scum QT/mason QT. As a general point, it's nice to be able to talk freely with someone you can trust. That's why I enjoy masoning anyways. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 20:28 GMT
#1707
On May 21 2013 05:24 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 05:22 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 05:15 Stutters695 wrote: Marv, although you're an obvious prot target, can we still expect your opinion of BH because of the mason QT before the flip? Very little has gone on there. I'll probably just copy/paste it. Are you allowed? For some reason I have a recollection of being told we were allowed, but I can't remember how or by who, because I don't see it in DontFearThePoster's filter. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 20:33 GMT
#1708
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 20:41 GMT
#1709
+ Show Spoiler + marvellosityPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 06:35 AM ET (US) Edit Delete yeah, i understand. go to bed and work with me later, i'll be around in the hours up to deadline. 25 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 06:33 AM ET (US) Come on man look I know you want to talk about other stuff, but the fact of the matter is, I can't NOT respond to DP's shit. It's not in my nature. 24 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 06:32 AM ET (US) Well, I should really get to bed. I'll be back several hours before deadline and vindicate myself with amazing cases, shooting down DP's arguments, and so on. 23 marvellosityPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 06:30 AM ET (US) Edit Delete yes but it still makes me giggle, which is all that matters. 22 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 06:29 AM ET (US) MISTAKES WERE MADE 21 marvellosityPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 06:27 AM ET (US) Edit Delete said mason case game ![]() 20 marvellosityPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 06:27 AM ET (US) Edit Delete you played in paranoia which was a mini and had 4 mafia 19 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 06:26 AM ET (US) also, seriously what kind of mini has 4 scum, 16 players is that even a mini 18 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 06:26 AM ET (US) man I really hope there isn't an SK, cause I'm gonna look bad as shit if two flips happen with the daypost. 17 marvellosityPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 05:41 AM ET (US) Edit Delete "because it's a mini". Blazing ![]() yes, case of the year, because that 3 scum thing smells really bad, sweetheart. 16 marvellosityPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 05:30 AM ET (US) Edit Delete so why WERE you assuming there were 3 mafia total? it makes no sense as an assumption 15 marvellosityPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 05:21 AM ET (US) Edit Delete had to go to bed :p 14 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 04:49 AM ET (US) Okay, now I just need to write the fucking case of the year on someone and I'll make it through tomorrow. It no longer looks like I'll be scum's NK tonight, which is unfortunate. I've really derped this up lol 13 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-20-2013 12:34 AM ET (US) "Not that any of this is relevant to proving that I'm town, but you're wrong and you need to be informed that you're wrong." to be saved for eva 12 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-19-2013 11:44 PM ET (US) actually, at least after I flip he will be very convinced 11 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-19-2013 11:40 PM ET (US) god more of this "look, a scumslip" bullshit. looks like I gotta convince DP scumslips don't exist 10 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-19-2013 11:23 PM ET (US) I'm around, by the way, and checking this thread. 9 marvellosityPerson was signed in when posted 05-19-2013 05:29 PM ET (US) Edit Delete sure thing, I'll be up for about 3 hours from now. and slacking at work tomorrow. :p 8 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-19-2013 05:27 PM ET (US) I've actually got work for about 2 hours, but after that I'll do my best to make up for my earlier low-tier play and get some stuff done tonight. Despite my general shittiness, there's a non-zero chance scum will shoot me tonight so I have to make good on my time. 7 marvellosityPerson was signed in when posted 05-19-2013 05:25 PM ET (US) Edit Delete fair point. now we're masoned it actually means I have to do work this cycle. damn 6 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-19-2013 05:24 PM ET (US) They're not scum, I don't think there's anything to gain by masoning those two. 5 marvellosityPerson was signed in when posted 05-19-2013 05:23 PM ET (US) Edit Delete you don't think iamp and DP are townier than me? ![]() 4 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-19-2013 05:21 PM ET (US) Seriously though since you're like the towniest player in the thread, by masoning you I assure that people don't say "oh BH is masoning his scumbuddy who has fakeclaimed being masoned". Also we have more to gain putting our heads together than a typical pair would. 3 marvellosityPerson was signed in when posted 05-19-2013 05:15 PM ET (US) Edit Delete Interesting. hello ![]() 2 BlazinghandPerson was signed in when posted 05-19-2013 05:15 PM ET (US) yo so what's new my homie. i can only mason for nights. I picked you since you're the man | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 20:58 GMT
#1714
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 21:11 GMT
#1722
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 21:18 GMT
#1725
On May 21 2013 06:16 goodkarma wrote: So I'm around. If someone can summarize the casepoints standing against me I would appreciate it. I'll start by trying to fetch out Spicy's stuff, since that seemed to be a piece of it. I posted something a couple of pages ago that's kinda important. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 21:31 GMT
#1728
On May 21 2013 06:27 Stutters695 wrote: More importantly, what do you make of these NKs Vayne? lol I like this, thanks stutters. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 22:02 GMT
#1734
On May 21 2013 06:59 Dandel Ion wrote: Why would a team around scum-BH shoot iamperfection, directly implicating him further? Basically, that assumes that either a SK shot iamp, or he's getting bussed all the way. Otherwise it just makes no sense. Because both iamp and I know that iamp is mason already, it's not a secret. There is literally zero chance the entire thread isn't reading iamp as the town mason in this scenario, so may as well take out a blue. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 22:02 GMT
#1735
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 22:11 GMT
#1738
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 23:11 GMT
#1751
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 23:14 GMT
#1753
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 23:19 GMT
#1758
Blazing's assumption that it means 3p is certainly not a good one. When I was last mafia in a 16 player mini, we had a mafia vigi (Hero Mini Mafia). If town has a vigi he might not have shot last night. Who knows. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 23:21 GMT
#1759
On May 21 2013 08:17 Stutters695 wrote: Marv, what are the odds of BH being a town mason in your opinion? pretty low, he's constantly put off scumhunting + making cases, despite promising to do so last night. He didn't use our mason QT as a chance to get anything done like he said he would either. Further his opening couple of posts in said QT came off rather as overjustification for masoning me (I talk about this in the iamp QT too) | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 23:29 GMT
#1765
On May 21 2013 08:28 goodkarma wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 08:11 marvellosity wrote: GK: so you're proposing you play differently when you don't know your alignment to when you know you're town? I've already explicitly described my thought process behind what I did day one in my filter. You should read that more closely.: Show nested quote + On May 19 2013 13:07 goodkarma wrote: If you want to lynch me, suit yourself. Just know this: Day 1 I don't check my role PM. So you're basically random lynching. I've resolved to do my best to help town, regardless of alignment, day one. Even as scum, if I were to lynch a teammate I figured I'd just be removing a liability. It was the fruit of all the bitterness of having people down my throat every day one as town. And if you don't believe me, check hydra mini mafia II obsQT. The only reason I knew my alignment early there was because of my partner peaked. I've honestly become very tired of putting up with this shit every day one. So feel free to lynch me. I've put it out there. I'll check my alignment closer to the deadline... And hopefully you'll have enough sanity to go after the obvious people that should be looked into for lynching (BH / JarJar) instead of the guy that's being a tryhard. So you're playing for town, which you were pretty insistent in The Game meant you were taking it slow and not making premature cases, wanting to interact before voting etc. You can't use not reading your role PM as part of your defence but then say you'd be playing as you would as town. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 23:30 GMT
#1766
On May 21 2013 08:25 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 08:24 Blazinghand wrote: On May 21 2013 08:21 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 08:17 Stutters695 wrote: Marv, what are the odds of BH being a town mason in your opinion? pretty low, he's constantly put off scumhunting + making cases, despite promising to do so last night. He didn't use our mason QT as a chance to get anything done like he said he would either. Further his opening couple of posts in said QT came off rather as overjustification for masoning me (I talk about this in the iamp QT too) but you asked me in fact, when i gave a short explanation, you asked for more explanation afterwards, which i provided wtf I'm talking about posts 2 and 4, which you posted totally unprompted, so no. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 23:34 GMT
#1767
On May 21 2013 08:28 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 08:19 marvellosity wrote: I don't know which I find more likely. Maybe I'll muse on which Les Mis character would likely be SK. Tenardier perhaps? :> Blazing's assumption that it means 3p is certainly not a good one. When I was last mafia in a 16 player mini, we had a mafia vigi (Hero Mini Mafia). If town has a vigi he might not have shot last night. Who knows. Well I require some insight if you will as I have never rolled scum or any sort of NK role. Do people often wait to use vigi shots if town/scum? I think most if not all of the games I've seen with one-shot vigs (although apparently there's other types of vigs like infinite shot? I've only ever seen one-shot i think) they tend to shoot pretty much as soon as they can? As far as shot reasoning, from what I understand: Mafia vig - shoot to remove extra threats, or cause confusion amongst town Town vig - shoot to remove lurkers, or if you're REALLY sure someone is scum? The Rayn kill obviously doesn't fit in my understanding of what a townvig should be doing (even though he lurked slightly more than usual for him, doesn't compare to other people in this thread) therefore it must have been mafia vig or 3P. I know in LXI Grush was shot by Ace because STARSENSES and he was a low profile player---likely to cause confusion as to who shot him and why (though in the end I think he really gave away that it wasn't a mafia shot because no mafia would ever shoot grush lol) so it makes me wonder if a 3P were choosing a similar strategy to Ace why not either shoot Grush to cause that confusion once more or a similarly useless player? Why Rayn? I would say town vigis usually shoot on night 1s (even though they shouldn't in minis especially, they should wait). I rolled vigi 3 times, shot twice first night and once 2nd night. Then again I don't expect to live to use my shot. Shooting grush causes no confusion (at least not to a town with me alive). Either town vigi claims his bad shot and I shout at them, or it's 3p, because on night 1 especially it sure as hell isn't a mafia shot. If I were 3p, I would leave enough weirdish, unreadable-ish players around like grush, stutters etc around as much as possible, because they never bring clarity to a game. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 20 2013 23:38 GMT
#1769
On May 21 2013 08:37 Blazinghand wrote: well it seemed like a good idea. huh? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:02 GMT
#1772
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:04 GMT
#1774
##Vote: BlazingHand less QQ, more pewpew | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:07 GMT
#1776
On May 21 2013 09:04 goodkarma wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 08:29 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 08:28 goodkarma wrote: On May 21 2013 08:11 marvellosity wrote: GK: so you're proposing you play differently when you don't know your alignment to when you know you're town? I've already explicitly described my thought process behind what I did day one in my filter. You should read that more closely.: On May 19 2013 13:07 goodkarma wrote: If you want to lynch me, suit yourself. Just know this: Day 1 I don't check my role PM. So you're basically random lynching. I've resolved to do my best to help town, regardless of alignment, day one. Even as scum, if I were to lynch a teammate I figured I'd just be removing a liability. It was the fruit of all the bitterness of having people down my throat every day one as town. And if you don't believe me, check hydra mini mafia II obsQT. The only reason I knew my alignment early there was because of my partner peaked. I've honestly become very tired of putting up with this shit every day one. So feel free to lynch me. I've put it out there. I'll check my alignment closer to the deadline... And hopefully you'll have enough sanity to go after the obvious people that should be looked into for lynching (BH / JarJar) instead of the guy that's being a tryhard. So you're playing for town, which you were pretty insistent in The Game meant you were taking it slow and not making premature cases, wanting to interact before voting etc. You can't use not reading your role PM as part of your defence but then say you'd be playing as you would as town. I definitely can. If I were to not PM peek and then later look and find out I'm scum, I wouldn't have bias in my posts until after that point. And that's very relevant to your case at hand, and what originally made you so irked, no? This is very much about you not believing that claim, so don't pretend it isn't. My play here is a little different from my prior games, and I've already highlighted those differences. I've also shown you how meta analyzing me based on my prior scumgames is pretty bad. That leaves my reads, so I'd like to ask you: what about them do you disagree with? That is my strength, and where the discussion should be. In particular, I'd be interested in hearing what you have to say about what I recently posted about Dandel. This is all missing the point. You claim that by not looking at your PM, you'd be playing for town. So, in The Game, where you were town, you had a set of principles you followed, that you didn't follow this game. Therefore your contention is that you playing for town is different from knowing you're town and that it explains the differences between the game where you read your town role PM and the game that you were merely playing in town's interests. And this point is nothing to do with your scumgames, which I've not attempted to draw parallels too? So I have no idea what that part was about anyways. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:08 GMT
#1778
On May 21 2013 09:04 s0Lstice wrote: Marv, do you believe that GK didn't check his role PM? don't know. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:09 GMT
#1779
On May 21 2013 09:07 s0Lstice wrote: also, Marv I'd like to hear about this some more: It's players like s0lstice we need to keep our eyes on. from the QT with iamp. What exactly is your read on me? Similar to iamp, you're in the murky middle. You're almost the definition of murky middle. You've not been massively townie, but you've not set scumbells off particularly either, and often these dudes are scum. If I was forced to choose an alignment for you right now, I'd say town, but I'm not very decisive about it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:24 GMT
#1787
On May 21 2013 09:16 s0Lstice wrote: To make this post... Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 02:17 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 02:10 yamato77 wrote: His suspicion on JJD is not well-explained by any stretch of the imagination. On May 18 2013 08:46 Dandel Ion wrote: JJD looks like a decent lynch. I'd sheep that. On May 18 2013 09:55 Dandel Ion wrote: I'm mainly interested in lynching jjd and gk atm. What has been said about jdd has been said, and he hasn't said anything. Yeah, no. This struck me as a valid point (perhaps because he was partially agreeing with me...) On May 18 2013 20:31 Dandel Ion wrote: On May 18 2013 19:18 marvellosity wrote: One other thing - something I don't like that both WoS and JarJar are doing is complaining about thread activity. That riles me quite a bit. Especially with WoS, given how posty he usually is himself. This actually interesting, since they do it only 10 minutes apart from each other. I think if they were both scum, they'd be more self-conscious about things like that and, if not not say it at all (since it sounds scummy as hell), at least space it out a little? That's a scumtell on JJD mainly, I'd say. He's hinding his scummery behind the posts of somebody else. He also made it sound like he's not complaining when he totally was complaining. And this is a pretty devious post construction if he's mafia: On May 19 2013 21:00 Dandel Ion wrote: I found it weird people were backing off jjd for no good reason/while keeping him in their "scum/would lynch" pile, so, trying to make sense of shit I decided to do a jjd counter! JJD Counter: Spicy voting him and confusing his name with WoS solstice defending him BH saying he would lynch jjd ^DP trying to lynch BH for that everyone else deflecting on BH GK saying he would like to lynch jjd, yet votes BH in accordance with ^ JJD COUNTER DISCONTINUED BECAUSE GK CLAIMED SCUM GG ##Unvote ##Vote Goodkarma You have to have a solid opinion on whether he actually checked his role PM or not at the time you made it, correct? sorry, I don't understand what that post has to do with GK checking his role PM? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:25 GMT
#1788
On May 21 2013 09:19 s0Lstice wrote: Oh, whoops, quoted the wrong post Marv, my bad. This is the one I meant: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 04:36 marvellosity wrote: Hmm, I found something that doesn't make GK look too hot. Here's his 2nd post in the game here, which I'll spoiler: + Show Spoiler + On May 18 2013 06:47 goodkarma wrote: I feel that Stutters's play so far has been scummy. First, he completely contradicts himself about his thoughts on meta: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote: On May 18 2013 03:01 s0Lstice wrote: the fact that i've only ever played town is a pretty important piece of information to share for people who don't know me/haven't played with me. getting my share on, don't hate Maybe I'm reading to much into this but I'm wondering why you want people to focus on your meta? Let's say I tell you this is like my 13th game without rolling scum. What does that tell you about my play this game that you'd consider important at all right now? So he doesn't feel meta's important here. But: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 03:19 Stutters695 wrote: On May 18 2013 03:07 DarthPunk wrote: On May 18 2013 03:06 s0Lstice wrote: On May 18 2013 03:04 DarthPunk wrote: On May 18 2013 03:02 s0Lstice wrote: stutters, you got any scum games you can quickly point me to save me some time? OOHHH Let me. As town, He lurks but sometimes says useful things. As scum, He lurks. Ohhh but not this time, according to him. Stutters you are forbidden to lurk. Not the first, nor the last time that phrase will be heard in this forum. Excellent summary of my town play. That fabled scum game is still waiting to happen though. When it comes to excusing his lurky play, it matters. Also, I found this to be scummy: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 06:00 Stutters695 wrote: Right now I could get behind a Vayne lynch. vayne how many games have you played (on TL and in general if you've played on other sites)? In other words, he's ready to sheep onto a Vayne lynch bandwaggon if it gains momentum. But he doesn't want to draw atttention to himself by putting down a vote. #Vote: Stutters I look forward to Stutters's response. If it is to be believed he's sometimes useful as town, then that's another scumtell as he's been nothing but useless thus far. Here's a couple of things he said in The Game. On March 17 2013 05:31 goodkarma wrote: @Mr. Wiggles: On March 17 2013 04:32 Mr. Wiggles wrote: On March 17 2013 03:53 goodkarma wrote: On March 17 2013 02:46 Coagulation wrote: The sast thing was clearly a joke. It was like an hour into day 1 and there was no one posting. You can just expect to be nailing scum 1 hour into day 1 when 90% of players havnt posted. thats fucking absurd. so omg someone makes a joke post to pass the time. Okay. I can understand it was early. But if we were to look in the here and now you still haven't provided anything that suggests who you think could be scum. I think what peashooter, and others here are getting at, is either post something that helps us scumhunt, or don't post at all. I am less inclined than others here to just policy lynch you. But you make it hard for us when you continue to spam the thread with emotional OMGUS responses. Hopefully you see where we're coming from. I would be most interested in hearing about your read on Grey. What are your own reads for scum? You've mentioned twice the need to scumhunt, and here you're chiding Coag for not providing anything in regards to who he thinks is scum, when you yourself have done the same. It's just more of the same general game play talk with no actual stances taken in regards to your own opinions. ##Vote: goodkarma Convince me you're not scum. Sowy, but I'm not giving you any scumreads until I'm ready to. You claim I haven't been scumhunting, but if you were to look at my posting so far I have: 1) Worked towards establishing a pro-town atmosphere, a reasonable early goal 2) Been pushing others for reads to get a better understanding of their motives and thought process, which is very important to getting scumreads As far as cases go, which aren't the only component of scumhunting: As I said, when I'm ready. And I promise you it will be long before the end of the day. But what I'd recommend you to do right now is to focus some of your energies on getting others to participate (not everyone has even posted yet!), and pursue some of your other scumreads. Because tunneling one read, and going into lurker mode thereafter is in itself pretty scummy... On March 17 2013 09:15 goodkarma wrote: I will be presenting my own case before the evening's done, so everyone has a solid 24ish hours to look at it. But I typically don't like to jump into cases as quickly as some here. Call that scummy if you want, but it's my playstyle. Highlights in bold and red are mine. The bolds are self-explanatory, and I bolded the red to explain it slightly - goodkarma is saying in this passage that it's important to push people for their motivations and thought processes, and thinks it's very important. Here he makes an early case on Stutters (despite saying last town-game he doesn't make early cases) and he never talked to him first about his thought processes. I would note at the end of his post in this thread he says "I look forward to Stutters response". But if we're to take his posts in The Game at face value, goodkarma likes to play by getting responses FIRST, voting LATER. oh ninjad. Well as per my post last page, he's either claiming to be town, or that he didn't read his role PM and that he was playing for town. so whatever really. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:33 GMT
#1791
On May 21 2013 09:27 s0Lstice wrote: What I'm saying is this. If you believe that GK did not check his PM, then you really can't treat anything he did before he said that as alignment indicative, right? Therefore, you should not be citing posts before that point. If you believe GK lied and did check the PM, then you should be calling for his lynch at the top of your lungs because there is no town motivation to lie about that. Ergo, if you are citing his posts that came before he said he didn't check his PM, an opinion is required on whether he was being truthful or not. you're not reading, or understanding, because i explained this in one of my responses to GK already. On May 19 2013 13:07 goodkarma wrote: If you want to lynch me, suit yourself. Just know this: Day 1 I don't check my role PM. So you're basically random lynching. I've resolved to do my best to help town, regardless of alignment, day one. Even as scum, if I were to lynch a teammate I figured I'd just be removing a liability. It was the fruit of all the bitterness of having people down my throat every day one as town. And if you don't believe me, check hydra mini mafia II obsQT. The only reason I knew my alignment early there was because of my partner peaked. I've honestly become very tired of putting up with this shit every day one. So feel free to lynch me. I've put it out there. I'll check my alignment closer to the deadline... And hopefully you'll have enough sanity to go after the obvious people that should be looked into for lynching (BH / JarJar) instead of the guy that's being a tryhard. his contention is that he was playing for town. ergo, i'm going to draw comparisons between how i expect him to behave when he's playing for town and 'knows' he's town or whatever. basically 1) if he's lying about his role PM he should die 2) if he's telling the truth, he still didn't behave like i'd expect a town GK (or a GK 'resolving to do his best to help town') to do, which was my original point. it's really not complicated. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:39 GMT
#1795
On May 21 2013 09:33 s0Lstice wrote: Show nested quote + On May 19 2013 19:22 marvellosity wrote: Just caught up on 8 pages and my mind's all blank because I'm still absolutely fuming about the GK role PM thing. I kinda feel like Marv should have had an opinion on whether he was lying or not, if he was fuming about it. The quote I just posted implies that Marv thinks posts prior to GKs claim are alignment indicative-->so he therefore must think he is lying-->and therefore should really be telling us to lynch the liar for lying. I think not reading your role PM goes completely against the spirit of the game and I find it absolutely disgusting. In Red Team I joined Hapa's policy lynch on OO for a while when he said he didn't read his role PM without saying much about it before leaving it alone and not talking about it. I'm not wasting my time thinking about something that's basically the height of unsportsmanship. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:40 GMT
#1796
On May 21 2013 09:39 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 09:33 s0Lstice wrote: On May 19 2013 19:22 marvellosity wrote: Just caught up on 8 pages and my mind's all blank because I'm still absolutely fuming about the GK role PM thing. I kinda feel like Marv should have had an opinion on whether he was lying or not, if he was fuming about it. The quote I just posted implies that Marv thinks posts prior to GKs claim are alignment indicative-->so he therefore must think he is lying-->and therefore should really be telling us to lynch the liar for lying. I think not reading your role PM goes completely against the spirit of the game and I find it absolutely disgusting. In Red Team I joined Hapa's policy lynch on OO for a while when he said he didn't read his role PM without saying much about it before leaving it alone and not talking about it. I'm not wasting my time thinking about something that's basically the height of unsportsmanship. well, maybe the 2nd height, after posting post-death. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:43 GMT
#1799
On May 21 2013 09:43 s0Lstice wrote: So you didn't think at all about whether he was lying or not? Just got angry about it? It was good enough to policy lynch there, but not here? stop asking me stupid questions, it's really irritating. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:48 GMT
#1801
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:52 GMT
#1803
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 00:58 GMT
#1806
On May 21 2013 09:56 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 09:52 marvellosity wrote: I did post my read on s0lstice, probably within the last page, dear. Ok you're right. Missed it 'cause posting. I'm actually kinda surprised at that read...you compare him to iamp? You didn't find iamp towny despite him masoning you? Also why the fuck are all of my scumreads avoiding me. /sort of sarcasm Where the fuck are GK and Dandel ragerageragerageragerage no no, I meant iamp's read on him in his will post. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 01:04 GMT
#1809
On May 21 2013 10:03 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 09:58 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 09:56 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 21 2013 09:52 marvellosity wrote: I did post my read on s0lstice, probably within the last page, dear. Ok you're right. Missed it 'cause posting. I'm actually kinda surprised at that read...you compare him to iamp? You didn't find iamp towny despite him masoning you? Also why the fuck are all of my scumreads avoiding me. /sort of sarcasm Where the fuck are GK and Dandel ragerageragerageragerage no no, I meant iamp's read on him in his will post. Oh lol I knew that was weird. Alright carry on. Man since you're around I feel like we should discuss something but I don't know if I have anything left to ask you. I need a break from this. That's fine, bed time is around now for me anyways ^_^ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 01:07 GMT
#1810
On May 21 2013 10:03 s0Lstice wrote: WoS, since marv is doing the electronic equivalent of sticking his fingers in his ears and going 'nah nah nah nah can't hear you'...I'll ask you. Are you following my reasoning here? Making a post painting GK in a bad light that cites posts that come prior to his claim of not reading his role PM requires SOME opinion on whether he checked his role PM. Citing those posts carries with it an assumption that GK was being truthful in his claim. I'm just not seeing how one could pursue GK without considering it, as it directly affects whether certain of his posts are alignment indicative. Why are you lying? I answered that question, I just stopped when you started asking me dumb questions about my reactions in Red team. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 01:14 GMT
#1812
On May 21 2013 10:11 s0Lstice wrote: I wouldn't have asked you the question I just asked him ![]() But you can go now. /ignore? really? just lol i have a very low tolerance for stupidity. anyway i'll draw you a little tree GK's claim. If false -----> lynch If true ------> lynch if analysis lines up with lynching him Now I'm not going to spend time thinking about whether he's telling the truth, because it's dumb. So to lynch GK, I have to work on the 'If true' part of the equation, because the If False one is already dealt with. Now go back and read my posts and actually understand the analysis instead of nitpicking on something completely irrelevant. Assume we're working on the 'If true' tree, which is part of my argument. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 08:46 GMT
#1836
On May 21 2013 17:08 Blazinghand wrote: You don't really think I'm scum, though, and you don't want to say it-- you can't. That's okay, though. I'll see if I can't do something to make your belief justified. You'd have done something by now, that's the point. You promised awesomeness 24 hours ago! That's a long delay. You've whined about why couldn't there be 2 town masons (there could! but it's irrelevant) and generally not done what I'd expect a town BH to do in this respect, which is to be the towniest town of townington. Your play has tonnes of similarities to mine, BH, and if I'd made a slip that wasn't a slip as town, I'd be shitting fucking townie rainbows in the thread because GODDAMNIT motherfucking marvellosity (insert BH as appropriate) is not getting lynched for something so fucking stupid, and motherfucking marvellosity is gonna catch the god-damn mafia and you'll all bloody see how townie I am. Instead all we see is this apathetic whining and resignation to die with a "last will". Yuk. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 08:54 GMT
#1838
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 09:22 GMT
#1839
On May 21 2013 11:02 s0Lstice wrote: I think that may have ended up being a violent agreement. Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 09:39 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 09:33 s0Lstice wrote: On May 19 2013 19:22 marvellosity wrote: Just caught up on 8 pages and my mind's all blank because I'm still absolutely fuming about the GK role PM thing. I kinda feel like Marv should have had an opinion on whether he was lying or not, if he was fuming about it. The quote I just posted implies that Marv thinks posts prior to GKs claim are alignment indicative-->so he therefore must think he is lying-->and therefore should really be telling us to lynch the liar for lying. I think not reading your role PM goes completely against the spirit of the game and I find it absolutely disgusting. In Red Team I joined Hapa's policy lynch on OO for a while when he said he didn't read his role PM without saying much about it before leaving it alone and not talking about it. I'm not wasting my time thinking about something that's basically the height of unsportsmanship. I see exactly what you are saying Marv, but I was concerning myself with his claim and you weren't. That was the rub. Alright, ok. Although I'm not sure we fully understand each other, but hopefully we understand enough that you don't need to argue with me about it anymore. The reason I was annoyed is because whatever you're getting at, it means literally nothing for my alignment or anything else I can think of, it's a semantics/viewpoint issue (which you seem to understand?). At any rate, the only thing I take from it is that you probably look a bit more townie for picking such a weird fight with me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 11:38 GMT
#1841
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 11:54 GMT
#1844
On May 21 2013 20:47 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 16:15 yamato77 wrote: I really don't understand the Rayn shot. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me as a scum kill. Seems more like a 3P kill, given that there were more dangerous players alive who seemed more universal as townreads. If we flip BH, it practically confirms this suspicion, and it does make BH look quite terrible if I trust my analysis. IDK man, this game is hard. If BH flips town I'm really going to be upset. My feeling on the rayn kill is that it if it was a 3P kill, then GK is a highly likely to be the 3P killer. Rayne's posts D1 moved around a bit but a large portion was written dealing with GK. It's the only thing that could possibly justify the kill aside from the vig shots. The other possible interpretation I was thinking was that it was a mafia vig shot and they shot rayne because they thought the better targets had docs on them that night. From the knowledge I have of a couple of serial killers, there's not necessarily a massive amount of thought that goes into a specific kill, especially night 1. But you might be right. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 12:48 GMT
#1848
On May 21 2013 21:40 JarJarDrinks wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 09:42 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 21 2013 09:26 Stutters695 wrote: On May 21 2013 09:19 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 21 2013 09:07 s0Lstice wrote: also, Marv I'd like to hear about this some more: It's players like s0lstice we need to keep our eyes on. from the QT with iamp. What exactly is your read on me? I'd be interested to hear this too. And actually solstice your other post reminds me, where the FUCK is Dandel? ##Vote: Dandel Ion I am aware I have other scumreads to push today but Dandel seems a good one as any to begin with; I can't simply go on marv's read of him alone. Dandel if you want to live through the day, fucking talk to me. So what makes you vote DI over BH. Do you not feel BH is nearly confirmed scum after finding out iamp is a mason? I can't honestly say how I feel about it. I have experienced scum BH before and as I've mentioned before some of it feels like it fits but not exactly. This could also very well be an easy frame attempt from mafia, or it could be exactly what it looks like and BH is scum. I am more than happy to consolidate on a BH lynch later on but considering the entire town is already down his throat, one extra person pushing him is one more person not trying to find other scum. am I the only one that reads this as "I'll vote for BH if he's already dead but if there's a chance I can get someone else lynched I will"? And what do you mean by "an easy frame attempt from mafia"? Doesn't frame imply that mafia did something to put suspicion on him? Where's the frame? Remind me to talk about this in 24 hours or so. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 13:17 GMT
#1851
On May 21 2013 22:13 s0Lstice wrote: Marv- we were at the same endpoint. I was just trying to put the cart before the horse, and erroneously expecting you to do the same. JarJar, we are well into the week now. After BH, are you still maintaining that DP is scum? Splendid. So now we're heading due forwards, what do you think of the merit of the original argument I was making before we got distracted? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 13:24 GMT
#1852
On May 21 2013 22:15 JarJarDrinks wrote: YOU, Darthpunk and probably Grush You - based on the CnP fail as well as just being inconsistant in your explaination for it. DP - reasons already stated. Grush - for not posting any real opinion yet this game. What else do you find suspicious about Spicy? Various players in this game are of the opinion that a mistake like that is more likely to come from a townie, why in particular do you disagree? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 14:39 GMT
#1858
On May 21 2013 23:38 Spicydinosaur wrote: I should add that I think jarjar is a lot lower on my scum list now since I voted for him. Mind explaining why? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 14:53 GMT
#1861
On May 21 2013 23:49 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 23:39 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2013 23:38 Spicydinosaur wrote: I should add that I think jarjar is a lot lower on my scum list now since I voted for him. Mind explaining why? One of my biggest problems with him was his lack of post/excuse for postings which he has improved on. I thought his asking for town credit didn't feel scummy. He was taking a lot of heat D1 and when the BH slip happened, his response felt like a "i told you so!" Just felt like a new player reaction more than a scum. I also found it extremely unlikely that jarjar was bussing BH from the beginning, so if BH flips scum, I'd doubt that jarjar would also. The other reason is that others have jumped out more. BH with the slip, dandel not giving a fuck and the last second vote still annoys me, and then GK for his no reading role pm, his flimsy arguments and for possibly being the 3P killer. I thought the same yesterday about the BH thing, today I'm not so convinced on it. I also checked out JarJar's newbie games; in 2 he didn't make any activity excuses at all, in 1 he made several. Guess the alignments? His general tone is bugging me too, but I don't know how to explain that one very well. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 15:20 GMT
#1864
The frame? what? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 15:27 GMT
#1867
On May 22 2013 00:24 WaveofShadow wrote: My thoughts on whether or not BH was framed. Are you 100% sure he is mafia? Because I'm not. Cute trap you appear to be trying to set though. Framed by what? ??? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 15:35 GMT
#1871
On May 22 2013 00:31 WaveofShadow wrote: Do we have different understandings of the meaning of the word or something? My thoughts at the time were, either BH is mafia and everything is exactly as it seems, or mafia killed iamp to make it look even more so that BH is mafia for reasons I explained to JJD, hence FRAMING him. I don't know what is so hard to understand here. Well framing is typically done by a framer. I've mentioned this before, but iamp doesn't have to die for him to stop being a town mason. 90%+ of the game thought iamp was strongly town (silly rayn), so if iamp and/or me are alive tomorrow producing those logs with the existing reads of town, what difference is it? Do you really think if iamp were alive, there'd be enough doubt about his alignment for it to make a substantial difference? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 15:44 GMT
#1874
On May 22 2013 00:38 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 20:38 marvellosity wrote: Hey DP, some input on this GK stuff? Talk to me, I'm bored. Sorry I missed this been busy with the computing society at uni. GK needs to contribute more or die. IMO. I want to see townie goodkarma from that newbie where he raped the scum team at lylo. That's not a very interesting or thoughtful response. I brought up specific points and GK made specific responses. I want to know what you think about them. Not some general waffle. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 15:48 GMT
#1875
On May 22 2013 00:41 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2013 00:35 marvellosity wrote: On May 22 2013 00:31 WaveofShadow wrote: Do we have different understandings of the meaning of the word or something? My thoughts at the time were, either BH is mafia and everything is exactly as it seems, or mafia killed iamp to make it look even more so that BH is mafia for reasons I explained to JJD, hence FRAMING him. I don't know what is so hard to understand here. Well framing is typically done by a framer. I've mentioned this before, but iamp doesn't have to die for him to stop being a town mason. 90%+ of the game thought iamp was strongly town (silly rayn), so if iamp and/or me are alive tomorrow producing those logs with the existing reads of town, what difference is it? Do you really think if iamp were alive, there'd be enough doubt about his alignment for it to make a substantial difference? I don't really understand the bolded part of your statement. As for the second, I suppose not. You think that there was no particular reason other than blue/iamp was towny for the kill last night? Again I have to ask, but in recent games I have played there appear to be (at least to me) obvious attempts to make me look like scum by scum killing townies I may have suspected or whom suspect me (usually the second). Is this or is it not something scum are likely to do, or is it me being a conspiracy theorist again? (I just can't fucking help myself) The bolded bit is really just my poor english which is subsequently explained ![]() iamp looked very town, and he outright claimed blue in the thread, while not being the most obvious medic target (DP and yamato were clamouring for that, iamp was telling the medic to protect me). You're overthinking things if you're looking deeply into the reasons why a strong very townie-looking player who blue-claimed was nightkilled. Here's some Blazing quotes. I've bolded various things, the rest of it doesn't really require any commentary. Let me know if you're desperate though. On May 20 2013 06:28 Blazinghand wrote: I've actually gotta go to work for a couple hours but I'll do my best to make up for my generally shit D1 play with some serious work tonight. Optimally I make it so scum has to shoot me. On May 20 2013 12:29 Blazinghand wrote: Interesting, but not really relevant. There's no choice more optimal than Marv. We work well together, he's smart, he's active and is around all the time, and I have a townread on him. He may not be as townread-ey to me as you are, but I don't interact well with you and my time wouldn't be as well-spent [as a quicktopic sharer - marv]. On May 20 2013 17:43 Blazinghand wrote: Honestly I've been entirely tied up with defending myself since the "scumslip" and haven't done the actual filter-diving that I promised beforehand. I'll get right on it. On May 21 2013 15:57 Blazinghand wrote: Most of my activity during the night was spent dealing with the "scumslip". Unfortunately, effort and time are limited resources, even for a guy like me-- more time spent doing one thing takes away from my ability to do others.So, I didn't get much done in the QT or even in the thread. It doesn't look good, but that doesn't change things: it is what it is. And, imo, my activity in the QT is not my best chance to avoid a mislynch. It's my activity in the thread, really. I'll do my best to write cases and generate valuable information before bed tonight. I doubt I'll be able to avoid getting lynched today, but it's still my duty to leave something behind so that after DP picks his jaw up off the floor he can get something done. On May 21 2013 17:08 Blazinghand wrote: You don't really think I'm scum, though, and you don't want to say it-- you can't. That's okay, though. I'll see if I can't do something to make your belief justified. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 15:53 GMT
#1877
On May 22 2013 00:52 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2013 00:44 marvellosity wrote: On May 22 2013 00:38 DarthPunk wrote: On May 21 2013 20:38 marvellosity wrote: Hey DP, some input on this GK stuff? Talk to me, I'm bored. Sorry I missed this been busy with the computing society at uni. GK needs to contribute more or die. IMO. I want to see townie goodkarma from that newbie where he raped the scum team at lylo. That's not a very interesting or thoughtful response. I brought up specific points and GK made specific responses. I want to know what you think about them. Not some general waffle. It's two in the morning but I'll take a look before bed and get back to you. It wasn't 2 in the morning when it all happened, you just didn't talk about it at the time either <3 It can wait until tomorrow if you want to sleep. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 15:58 GMT
#1880
On May 22 2013 00:57 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2013 00:53 marvellosity wrote: On May 22 2013 00:52 DarthPunk wrote: On May 22 2013 00:44 marvellosity wrote: On May 22 2013 00:38 DarthPunk wrote: On May 21 2013 20:38 marvellosity wrote: Hey DP, some input on this GK stuff? Talk to me, I'm bored. Sorry I missed this been busy with the computing society at uni. GK needs to contribute more or die. IMO. I want to see townie goodkarma from that newbie where he raped the scum team at lylo. That's not a very interesting or thoughtful response. I brought up specific points and GK made specific responses. I want to know what you think about them. Not some general waffle. It's two in the morning but I'll take a look before bed and get back to you. It wasn't 2 in the morning when it all happened, you just didn't talk about it at the time either <3 It can wait until tomorrow if you want to sleep. I wasn't really around when it all happened. I'm going to make a coffee and get into it though if you'll be around for at least another half hour? Sure, I'll be here. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 16:01 GMT
#1881
On May 22 2013 00:57 WaveofShadow wrote: DP mentioned this about BH; would you expect a wrongfully accused BH to rail against his 'retarded attackers' or act the way he's been acting? Regarding your line of quotes: honestly if BH really was town it's true that the best use of his time would have been to just ignore DP for the time being, convince YOU that he was town and then the two of you together would have done a better job in preventing a supposed mislynch. I don't know what else there is to say about all this. The evidence is overwhelming and damning. My gut feelings aside that there's something 'up,' I don't really see what else I can dispute. If people like JJD (that aren't likely scum) think that I'm not committed to a BH lynch because my vote isn't on him atm I can change it, but I'd still like to find out who the rest of the scumteam are and there's over 24h to go, so I don't see why that matters. I'd perfectly expect BH to rail against his attackers as either alignment. The fact is on Sunday evening he promised to filter dive and hunt mafia; he didn't. He fought DP. Fair enough! Then on Monday he came back, and he didn't hunt mafia either. He's gone to bed twice (!) since he promised he would be hunting mafia. Also see my earlier post about how I think BH would generally behave in such situations: On May 21 2013 17:46 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 17:08 Blazinghand wrote: You don't really think I'm scum, though, and you don't want to say it-- you can't. That's okay, though. I'll see if I can't do something to make your belief justified. You'd have done something by now, that's the point. You promised awesomeness 24 hours ago! That's a long delay. You've whined about why couldn't there be 2 town masons (there could! but it's irrelevant) and generally not done what I'd expect a town BH to do in this respect, which is to be the towniest town of townington. Your play has tonnes of similarities to mine, BH, and if I'd made a slip that wasn't a slip as town, I'd be shitting fucking townie rainbows in the thread because GODDAMNIT motherfucking marvellosity (insert BH as appropriate) is not getting lynched for something so fucking stupid, and motherfucking marvellosity is gonna catch the god-damn mafia and you'll all bloody see how townie I am. Instead all we see is this apathetic whining and resignation to die with a "last will". Yuk. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 16:15 GMT
#1883
Thank you for asking me to explain something I said I couldn't explain very well. He's coming across as overly aggressive, it feels like he's working against town rather than with town. Do you understand what I mean by that? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 16:18 GMT
#1885
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 16:24 GMT
#1890
On May 22 2013 01:18 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2013 01:15 marvellosity wrote: Because I'm omnipresent and I have lovely abs. Thank you for asking me to explain something I said I couldn't explain very well. He's coming across as overly aggressive, it feels like he's working against town rather than with town. Do you understand what I mean by that? Haha I meant to say something like "explain to the best of your ability" but I guess I forgot that part. Honestly, no I'm not sure I do understand. I'll go have a look at him in the next little while though with that in mind. Like... he starts off with a bunch of activity shit, and since then on several occasions he's seemed angry/aggressive without anything in particular to warrant it. I really would encourage you to skim his filter in XXXIX just for 'feels'. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 16:26 GMT
#1892
On May 22 2013 01:24 s0Lstice wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 22:21 JarJarDrinks wrote: On May 18 2013 22:11 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 22:03 iamperfection wrote: marv do you think jarjar would try to throw dirt on bh if bh is town and jarjar were scum? Maybe? I understand what you're getting at, but I'm ambivalent about it. Is he trying to imply that BH and I are scumbuddies? Is that so when BH flips red I don't look quite as good? If you think me and BH are both scum then help me bus him. ##vote: blazinghand (Sorry if I'm interpretting your post wrong iamp. But that's what I felt like u were saying) This post by JarJar is just so ballsy and fearless. I can't help but assign JJ mad townie points every time I read it. Definitely muddies the waters for me. Either that or it's hilariously honest. lol. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 16:35 GMT
#1896
On May 22 2013 01:29 Spicydinosaur wrote: Marv or anyone, has there ever been a game with 2 town night masons as BH would like to believe? I ask because my issue with BH is turning less about the 'slip' and more about the setup and his defense. With Iamp flipping mason it would seem weird for a setup to have 2 town night masons. Just doesn't feel right. Also as Marv pointed out, BH's delayed postings are troubling and definitely scum indicative. I'd say a 1-1 split was perhaps more likely, but a 2-0 split is certainly pretty possible. If anyone's lynching BH because we've had a town mason flip they're doing it wrong, it's circumstancial evidence at best. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 16:40 GMT
#1901
On May 22 2013 01:31 s0Lstice wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2013 01:26 marvellosity wrote: On May 22 2013 01:24 s0Lstice wrote: On May 18 2013 22:21 JarJarDrinks wrote: On May 18 2013 22:11 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 22:03 iamperfection wrote: marv do you think jarjar would try to throw dirt on bh if bh is town and jarjar were scum? Maybe? I understand what you're getting at, but I'm ambivalent about it. Is he trying to imply that BH and I are scumbuddies? Is that so when BH flips red I don't look quite as good? If you think me and BH are both scum then help me bus him. ##vote: blazinghand (Sorry if I'm interpretting your post wrong iamp. But that's what I felt like u were saying) This post by JarJar is just so ballsy and fearless. I can't help but assign JJ mad townie points every time I read it. Definitely muddies the waters for me. Either that or it's hilariously honest. lol. That could explain the aggressiveness and anger. Hes spent the whole game building credit for the bus, but no credit is being assigned to him. Associations before the flip ftw Little tidbit for you to think about. The original question from iamp to me was saying this: "do you think jarjar would try to throw dirt on bh if bh is town and jarjar were scum?" What iamp was implying was this: how likely is it for a newer scumplayer to attack a known, stronger player? iamp is basically saying that JarJar looks townier for attacking a strong player. This isn't necessarily that obvious, but JarJar thinks that iamp is saying that Jarjar (mafia) would only attack BH if he were mafia. It could well mean implied guilt, when the original intention of iamp's was actually more of a mini-defence. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 16:41 GMT
#1902
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 16:43 GMT
#1904
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 16:57 GMT
#1907
On May 22 2013 01:56 DarthPunk wrote: Marv you better respond because i am both tired and wired from coffeee and i put in effort just cause you asked me. haha sorry, I have nothing to respond to, it all looks pretty good. For me Dandel is below JJD, however. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 20:03 GMT
#1915
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 20:29 GMT
#1919
On May 22 2013 05:09 yamato77 wrote: Note, I've already given my reasons for wanting to lynch all three of those people, Marv. Best not engage in any of the other discourse then! | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 20:40 GMT
#1922
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 20:49 GMT
#1924
On May 22 2013 05:45 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2013 05:40 marvellosity wrote: There's been quite a lot of conversation about JJD. Missed it? Am I supposed to have an opinion on him? Have you been taking the dense pills or something? This shouldn't be so hard | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 21 2013 21:36 GMT
#1932
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 09:44 GMT
#2077
On May 22 2013 11:44 JarJarDrinks wrote: I think the reason everyone is on my case and accussing me of bussing BH is because they don't want to believe that a relative noob was able to ID scum so early in the game. no On May 22 2013 14:26 WaveofShadow wrote: People don't listen to me. Ever. Aww :< On May 22 2013 15:49 DarthPunk wrote: we are still lynching blazinghand. Don't be stupid. This part where blazinghand gives us reads and stuff works like this. If BH is town then we have some solid insight into what a confirmed town thought about the game. If he flips scum he at least has taken a position on everyone. Although it is probably useless due to WIFOM. Blazinghand's contributions since he came into the thread have been meh. Like he makes a case on GK who is universally viewed as scummy. EZ to fake as scum. Oh and don't call me bad BH as it is blatantly untrue. you're bad <3 (jk babygirl). DP is right though in that we stay on target. The massive problem with BH's contributions is that they came too late. Almost 48 hours after his shitfest with DP! Too long. The issue with this is two-fold 1) it gives time to view how the thread sentiment is. e.g. continued attacks on dandel, my new attacks on GK and JJD, etc. 2) it means he only has to contribute for 24 hours instead of 48 or more I'm also struggling to place 4 anti-town elements (which i presume we have, at least) without BH being one of them. Also if BH flips town he said I was 100% town so yolo! | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 09:49 GMT
#2079
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 09:50 GMT
#2080
On May 22 2013 18:48 yamato77 wrote: Is there anything in particular you want me to read and respond to, Marv? Not much I guess. I'd like you to be active in the night-phase regardless of the flip colour, if that's ok. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 13:10 GMT
#2083
On May 22 2013 21:57 s0Lstice wrote: Marv I want to hear what you think about what I wrote on JarJar There's not a lot to say, it's solid enough. tbh I'm coming round to killing dandel for his apathy now as well. I said whenever it was "I'll see how he performs on Day 2" and... well... yeah. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 15:33 GMT
#2106
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 15:55 GMT
#2113
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 20:49 GMT
#2144
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 20:54 GMT
#2146
On May 23 2013 05:46 Blazinghand wrote: marv town jesus h christ also he's been playing just like he's played as town he's been less active today but i give him a pass on it. read his QT with iamp, scum marv would have advised early mason claim rather than advising against because he doesn't want to be implicated trust me like this is actually something with insight. sorry if you're town BH but we're committed at this stage. if you are town i wish you hadn't fucked around for so long before making cases, it just makes it impossible to trust you. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 20:56 GMT
#2148
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 20:58 GMT
#2150
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 21:03 GMT
#2159
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 22 2013 21:06 GMT
#2164
On May 23 2013 06:03 DarthPunk wrote: well, this was my fault. I should have de tunnelled at the last minute or something. kinda, but i went along with it, so whatever. vigis and SK have to be hitting mafia tonight. i'm gonna afk until tomorrow. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 12:01 GMT
#2227
Vayne, to say I've been disinterested is an incredible stretch. On May 23 2013 15:55 VayneAuthority wrote: Yea his emotion is a towntell for me as well, but his martyring is a scumtell. I mean he's not even set to be lynched, doesn't even have a vote on him and hes already being defensive/martyring? maybe im a shitty player or maybe this is just that obvious. This isn't really true, almost the whole game finds him suspicious, the just-flipped town had him as his main scumread. It's almost a 'designated' lynch, and that in itself is worrying. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 12:04 GMT
#2228
Probably everyone forgot by now but the whole "sputnik is a scumread" -> "sputnik is playing too scummily to be scum" is something pretty concerning really. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 12:11 GMT
#2229
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 12:26 GMT
#2231
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 12:43 GMT
#2234
On May 23 2013 21:35 Spicydinosaur wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2013 21:26 marvellosity wrote: The point is, if you think he'll flip town, it's not a scumread. I already defended this so I'll just repost it Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 04:18 Spicydinosaur wrote: Its a scum read because he's been absolutely horrible that has done nothing to help town but i felt that he would be a better vig shot thanhim lynch brcause of seeingthe votes. You think a scumread will flip scum, by definition. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 15:17 GMT
#2241
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 15:21 GMT
#2244
Anyone who later claims dumb town-vig should be lynched immediately. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 15:30 GMT
#2247
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 15:32 GMT
#2249
:OOOOO | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 15:39 GMT
#2252
On May 24 2013 00:36 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2013 00:27 Spicydinosaur wrote: Vayne has given me a town vibe since the beginning. His analysis has been level headed and hasn't joined a bandwagon. I was about to say something like "what analysis" but I guess he HAS been around lately. I dunno he seems just a little too lurky for my liking but I have no reason to disbelieve anything he's said. Probably town, yeah. I wouldn't place 'not joining a bandwagon' as a towntell though. For you either. True words my friend. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 15:44 GMT
#2256
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 15:57 GMT
#2258
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 16:11 GMT
#2262
On May 24 2013 01:06 DarthPunk wrote: Still want to lynch dandel because he doesn't give a fuck. If I die lynch DI. Apart from him I have no fucking clue anymore. Maybe GK, Maybe Yamato, Maybe S0lstice, maybe some of the newbies who I barely remember being in the game at all. Policy lynch marv if he is somehow still alive and hasn't destroyed the scum team yet at MYLO/LYLO. I have to say, I'm not feeling very destroy-y right now. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 16:12 GMT
#2263
On May 24 2013 01:10 JarJarDrinks wrote: Show nested quote + I didn't say that DP tunneling BH makes him look town. But no I don't think it makes him look scummy. I could see a town DP doing the same thing. My case against DP is not because he pushed for BHs lynchOn May 24 2013 00:40 WaveofShadow wrote: So you think that DP is scum, yet spent an entire day tunneling the everliving fuck out of a townie which ISN'T scummy? I really don't understand this analysis. It looks like you're just picking and choosing the points you want to your own ends. Wasn't the thrust of your case against DP that he dropped the case on BH when BH originally claimed, and then 'handily' jumped on the 'scumslip'? Can you remind me what your case on DP actually is? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 16:20 GMT
#2268
On May 24 2013 01:18 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2013 01:17 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 24 2013 01:16 DarthPunk wrote: On May 24 2013 01:11 marvellosity wrote: On May 24 2013 01:06 DarthPunk wrote: Still want to lynch dandel because he doesn't give a fuck. If I die lynch DI. Apart from him I have no fucking clue anymore. Maybe GK, Maybe Yamato, Maybe S0lstice, maybe some of the newbies who I barely remember being in the game at all. Policy lynch marv if he is somehow still alive and hasn't destroyed the scum team yet at MYLO/LYLO. I have to say, I'm not feeling very destroy-y right now. I believe in you. Also I can expect you would say the same thing if someone left someone like BC or something alive at lylo. Can't think of a game where THAT happened. don't know if sarcastic. Town BC and Town Palmar were alive on Day 9 or something of LXI | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 16:24 GMT
#2270
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:03 GMT
#2282
i was roleblocked | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:05 GMT
#2284
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:06 GMT
#2286
Gonna leave my vote on you until/unless I'm sure on a mafia. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:07 GMT
#2288
He should have been shooting for mafia but he's just acting as mafia's 2nd KP for no reason that I can discern. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:10 GMT
#2291
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:12 GMT
#2293
The correct gameplay situation is to lynch you. Because the only way town can win ultimately is by lynching you, and we'll control less and less of the town. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:14 GMT
#2296
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:21 GMT
#2299
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:26 GMT
#2307
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:28 GMT
#2311
On May 24 2013 06:26 s0Lstice wrote: I think we have to lynch him. We have no assurance he won't hit town tomorrow and end the game for us, oddly enough. It's just like the BH day, where our target was there the entire day and killed all other discussion. And if it was 3 mafia, then if we lynched mafia today, it would be 6-2-1 then the SK would be shooting at town anyways | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:28 GMT
#2312
On May 24 2013 06:27 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2013 06:25 Dandel Ion wrote: I had no posts written up, I meant Fakeclaims International - 100% host provided. role PM style. Ok this is what I was wondering. For people who have ever fakeclaimed stuff, do you always have your claims provided for you if there is claimable flavour involved? WHY DOES IT MATTER | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:33 GMT
#2316
On May 24 2013 06:32 WaveofShadow wrote: Are fakeclaimed roles given out by hosts roles that exist in game? We can't know that. How is anyone supposed to know the answer to that? What are you doing? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:35 GMT
#2317
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:35 GMT
#2319
On May 24 2013 06:35 s0Lstice wrote: Marv you know Dandel better than I do. I'm not certain he can be trusted to do the optimal thing an SK would do in any given situation. I mean if he goes full on troll...it may be better to remove him from the game ASAP. Gotta think on it. This is blatantly obvious. He shot town last night when he should have been shooting mafia. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:39 GMT
#2321
On May 24 2013 06:38 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2013 06:28 marvellosity wrote: On May 24 2013 06:26 s0Lstice wrote: I think we have to lynch him. We have no assurance he won't hit town tomorrow and end the game for us, oddly enough. It's just like the BH day, where our target was there the entire day and killed all other discussion. And if it was 3 mafia, then if we lynched mafia today, it would be 6-2-1 then the SK would be shooting at town anyways Except I wouldn't know if that was the case anyways so I actually do still need to shoot mafia, but nice try I'll give you a 3/10 the fact you don't know yourself makes your own plan all the more stupid | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:41 GMT
#2324
on the flipside, we could lose by lynching Dandel the choices aren't pretty | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:42 GMT
#2326
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:42 GMT
#2327
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:49 GMT
#2332
11-4-1 could be balanced, because an SK is assumed to try to balance the teams out if town are lynching town. however our SK is making the game even more lopsided. it's hard to say. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:49 GMT
#2333
On May 24 2013 06:48 WaveofShadow wrote: Like, can you really have that many anti-town elements in play? Ugh there's still so much about game setup that I have no fucking clue about. Marv do you just want to lynch him and hope we don't endgame ourselves then, is that what you're saying? yes, i want fate in our hands basically. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 21:57 GMT
#2338
If it's 5-4-1, we have two options: 1) lynch SK, we lose immediately to the nightkill 2) lynch mafia, when after nightkills it would be either 4-1-1 (where we can lynch the SK) or 3-2-1, where the game is out of our hands If it's 6-3-1 then lynching either mafia or SK is fine. The issue is that the SK doesn't know whether there are 3 or 4 mafia. So if we lynch mafia, there are two possible distributions according to the SK: 5-3-1 OR 6-2-1 after the lynch, and assuming mafia shoot town, 4-3-1 and 5-2-1. In the 2nd instance, SK would hit town, in the 1st instance, SK would hit town as well, because if he hits mafia then town can afford to lynch the SK. I'm rambling a bit but basically in all scenarios, the best play for the SK is to hit town and cause us to lose, because the SK can't know how many mafia there are. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 23 2013 23:52 GMT
#2349
On May 24 2013 08:36 Dandel Ion wrote: Considering I outright told you who I killed, I don't see how you're wondering that. Also lynching me is really not your best move. But I see you are content to ignore the mighty spears of logic just because you dislike my play or whatever. I outlined pretty clearly why it was the right play actually. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 00:07 GMT
#2351
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 00:10 GMT
#2354
On May 24 2013 09:08 Dandel Ion wrote: Except that it's wrong and it isn't. But you prefer not to search and find mafia while having a 50:50 chance to outright lose the game to boot. Meh, it's your town. Do what you want with it. Try to disprove it if it's wrong. Here's a clue - you can't. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 00:11 GMT
#2355
On May 24 2013 09:09 VayneAuthority wrote: Also WoS and marv's posting from after this kill are extremely suspicious, WoS is up more on my scumdar and marv is breaking into it right now. I think I might need to reconsider this. Why is marv pushing so hard for this lynch? Is he part of a 4 man mafia team trying to end game us right now? Why is WoS dumbtelling? If you read my posts it should be pretty clear. Also BH calling me 100% town, iamp calling me certain town, yada yada yada. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 00:11 GMT
#2356
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 00:12 GMT
#2359
On May 24 2013 09:12 VayneAuthority wrote: I did and I pride myself on percentage play which is why I won't be changing my vote. Kudos if you're mafia though. Ok. So if you did the maths yourself you know why I'm pushing this lynch. Silly boy ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 00:13 GMT
#2360
On May 24 2013 09:12 Dandel Ion wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2013 09:10 marvellosity wrote: On May 24 2013 09:08 Dandel Ion wrote: Except that it's wrong and it isn't. But you prefer not to search and find mafia while having a 50:50 chance to outright lose the game to boot. Meh, it's your town. Do what you want with it. Try to disprove it if it's wrong. Here's a clue - you can't. All I see is "I don't care if I could autolose the game I need CONTROL! CONTROOOOOOOL" I see. So you can't disprove the airtight argument that for your own wincon you need to shoot town tomorrow to have a chance at a win/draw. Good stuff dandel. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 00:14 GMT
#2362
On May 24 2013 09:13 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2013 09:12 marvellosity wrote: On May 24 2013 09:12 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 24 2013 09:11 marvellosity wrote: Do the maths yourself, Vayne. I did and I pride myself on percentage play which is why I won't be changing my vote. Kudos if you're mafia though. Ok. So if you did the maths yourself you know why I'm pushing this lynch. Silly boy ![]() Yea I am just saying that it makes sense for you from both a town and mafia perspective lol, while other people wrote you off as sure town no one gets a free pass from me Of course. Fair enough. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 00:17 GMT
#2365
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 09:20 GMT
#2382
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 09:44 GMT
#2384
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 13:27 GMT
#2389
On May 24 2013 21:55 JarJarDrinks wrote: OK, I get that everyone respects and listens to marv, but I think he's wrong here. Lynching the SK is a bad play. If we lynch DL then we're crossing our fingers that there's only 3 scum. Otherwise we lose to the NK. Now marv already acknowledged that in his analysis. Show nested quote + Now first off this math is wrong. After nightkills it doesn't go to 4-1-1 or 3-2-1. It goes to 4-2-1 or 3-3-1. On May 24 2013 06:57 marvellosity wrote: If it's 5-4-1, we have two options: 1) lynch SK, we lose immediately to the nightkill 2) lynch mafia, when after nightkills it would be either 4-1-1 (where we can lynch the SK) or 3-2-1, where the game is out of our hands But I don't even think that's what would happen, for 2 reasons: 1. I don't think DL can afford to shoot town and risk it going to 3-3-1. That gives way too much power to mafia and he almost surely can't win. I think he either has to shoot mafia or not shoot @ all 2. Wouldn't mafia shoot @ DL? They don't really differentiate between non-scum. Doesn't it make sense that they shoot @ the guy who has KP and will almost surely not get protection? And then like marv said, if it's 6-3-1 then we're fine either way. The only issue is that we have to be pretty positive that we're lynching scum today. That's the only way we guarantee that we don't lose the game on this lynch. Serial Killers on TL often have at least a one-shot bulletproof protection. I don't see why the SK would be defenceless here. And again, if there were 4 mafia and we killed mafia (5-4-1 -> 5-3-1) then mafia would shoot at town for aforementioned likely bulletproof reason (so 4-3-1) and then SK is forced to shoot at town otherwise a 4-2-1 situation arises where town gets to lynch the SK for free. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 13:43 GMT
#2392
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 13:46 GMT
#2393
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 13:52 GMT
#2395
*grumbles about maths n shit* | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 13:53 GMT
#2397
On May 24 2013 22:52 s0Lstice wrote: How much of a chance does an SK have in a 3-3-1 marv? In various scenarious town becomes kingmaker 3-3-1, town and SK join together to lynch mafia for 3-2-1, mafia shoot town and SK shoot mafia, 2-1-1, town gets to decide who wins (SK or mafia) but town loses either way. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 15:16 GMT
#2408
On May 25 2013 00:08 s0Lstice wrote: If the scum KP is on the JK, does his protect still go through for the night? yes, the real question is whether a roleblocker can prevent a JK's protection (usually it will prevent it, but not always) | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 15:54 GMT
#2413
On May 25 2013 00:53 Dandel Ion wrote: You just need to lynch scum, then you don't have to rely on me to do anything :3 simply totally untrue | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 15:58 GMT
#2415
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:00 GMT
#2417
On May 25 2013 00:59 Dandel Ion wrote: I thought you finally noticed how wrong you were when that guy that's not me pointed it out. 5-3-1 after the lynch, if you shoot town and mafia shoot town the game is over, therefore it does rely on you we done? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:02 GMT
#2419
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:04 GMT
#2421
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:06 GMT
#2423
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:14 GMT
#2425
On May 25 2013 01:12 WaveofShadow wrote: SO, LOOKING FOR SCUM GK comes back to announce a RB and then disappears until tomorrow at whch point he will 'solve the game.' I really don't know what to make of this. After his rant the other day I was beginning to think he was town despite the meta cases looking good against him because I know what it feels like to have people jump down your throat every game, and that post is a reaction I could see myself resorting to. I have been wrong about this sort of read before (Clarity in LXI) so I don't know if I can trust those gut feels though. At this point I almost feel like if we can finally discern what the fuck is going on with GK we'll be that much closer to figuring all this shit out. Would anyone like to discuss? This is true, the problem is killing Dandel is still the right play even if we pinned him as 100% mafia right now. I've got 45 minutes till I'm off work so happy to talk about anything GK-related in the meantime. I'm open for questions | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:22 GMT
#2429
lynch mafia -> 5-3-1, mafia kill town, dandel roleblocked -> 4-3-1 lynch mafia -> 4-2-1, mafia kill town, dandel roleblocked -> 3-2-1 lynch mafia -> 3-1-1, mafia kill town, dandel roleblocked -> 2-1-1 lynch mafia -> 2-0-1, roleblock SK, win! The problem with this scenario is that it magically assumes that mafia will manage not to hit OR roleblock the jailkeeper for 3 consecutive cycles. Now, if we lynch the SK at 5-4-1 lynch SK -> 5-4-0, jailkeeper has to get one hero roleblock/jail and destiny is back in town's hands. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:23 GMT
#2430
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:25 GMT
#2431
On May 25 2013 01:18 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2013 01:14 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:12 WaveofShadow wrote: SO, LOOKING FOR SCUM GK comes back to announce a RB and then disappears until tomorrow at whch point he will 'solve the game.' I really don't know what to make of this. After his rant the other day I was beginning to think he was town despite the meta cases looking good against him because I know what it feels like to have people jump down your throat every game, and that post is a reaction I could see myself resorting to. I have been wrong about this sort of read before (Clarity in LXI) so I don't know if I can trust those gut feels though. At this point I almost feel like if we can finally discern what the fuck is going on with GK we'll be that much closer to figuring all this shit out. Would anyone like to discuss? This is true, the problem is killing Dandel is still the right play even if we pinned him as 100% mafia right now. I've got 45 minutes till I'm off work so happy to talk about anything GK-related in the meantime. I'm open for questions This is a familiar situation between us, marv. It bothers me a little that we've had these discussions multiple times yet pretty much nothing has come of it every time we do it, but whatever. I don't think anyone commented on GK's rant post. Did you have any thoughts? The biggest thing that we know NOW at the time we didn't at the time of GK's rant post, is that Spicy, his main (I think?) suspicion is dead. Do you remember earlier in the game, when he said the main difference between town GK and mafia GK is that mafia GK has shit reads? well........... | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:29 GMT
#2434
On May 25 2013 01:28 JarJarDrinks wrote: Show nested quote + Am I missing something marv? Mafia RBing JK wont hurt since DL would still get blocked correct?On May 25 2013 00:31 Promethelax wrote: If both Roleblocker and Jailkeeper exist, No. However a Roleblocked Jail Keeper's Roleblock will still go through. look at the numbers, i'm assuming dandel's shot doesn't go through every night. mafia still has a shot. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:31 GMT
#2435
On May 25 2013 01:27 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2013 01:23 marvellosity wrote: if there are any holes in that, I'm all ears You're assuming that mafia don't already know who JK is. If Dandel is telling the truth it's reasonable to assume that they might know as well (does anyone here know? I think I might have an idea). Also if he is telling the truth considering the way he's been playing all game, is it likely that he'd actually completely fuck us (and maybe himself) by revealing the JK's identity? it doesn't matter. if the mafia know who the JK is we're dead regardless. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:32 GMT
#2437
On May 25 2013 01:31 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2013 01:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:18 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 25 2013 01:14 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:12 WaveofShadow wrote: SO, LOOKING FOR SCUM GK comes back to announce a RB and then disappears until tomorrow at whch point he will 'solve the game.' I really don't know what to make of this. After his rant the other day I was beginning to think he was town despite the meta cases looking good against him because I know what it feels like to have people jump down your throat every game, and that post is a reaction I could see myself resorting to. I have been wrong about this sort of read before (Clarity in LXI) so I don't know if I can trust those gut feels though. At this point I almost feel like if we can finally discern what the fuck is going on with GK we'll be that much closer to figuring all this shit out. Would anyone like to discuss? This is true, the problem is killing Dandel is still the right play even if we pinned him as 100% mafia right now. I've got 45 minutes till I'm off work so happy to talk about anything GK-related in the meantime. I'm open for questions This is a familiar situation between us, marv. It bothers me a little that we've had these discussions multiple times yet pretty much nothing has come of it every time we do it, but whatever. I don't think anyone commented on GK's rant post. Did you have any thoughts? The biggest thing that we know NOW at the time we didn't at the time of GK's rant post, is that Spicy, his main (I think?) suspicion is dead. Do you remember earlier in the game, when he said the main difference between town GK and mafia GK is that mafia GK has shit reads? well........... See this is more meta shit though and I am having a lot of trouble taking it all at face value as it seems almost everything directed at him is solely based on meta (aside from his decidedly odd play during this game). Is it likely that's he'd out himself like this if he knew how Spicy was going to flip? ALso marv do you have anything to say about the CONTENT of his rant post? Also what did you mean by 'even if Dandel is 100% mafia?' This isn't "meta shit". This is GK's *own* description of his play. In *this* game. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:33 GMT
#2438
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:35 GMT
#2439
On May 25 2013 01:32 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2013 01:31 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 25 2013 01:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:18 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 25 2013 01:14 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:12 WaveofShadow wrote: SO, LOOKING FOR SCUM GK comes back to announce a RB and then disappears until tomorrow at whch point he will 'solve the game.' I really don't know what to make of this. After his rant the other day I was beginning to think he was town despite the meta cases looking good against him because I know what it feels like to have people jump down your throat every game, and that post is a reaction I could see myself resorting to. I have been wrong about this sort of read before (Clarity in LXI) so I don't know if I can trust those gut feels though. At this point I almost feel like if we can finally discern what the fuck is going on with GK we'll be that much closer to figuring all this shit out. Would anyone like to discuss? This is true, the problem is killing Dandel is still the right play even if we pinned him as 100% mafia right now. I've got 45 minutes till I'm off work so happy to talk about anything GK-related in the meantime. I'm open for questions This is a familiar situation between us, marv. It bothers me a little that we've had these discussions multiple times yet pretty much nothing has come of it every time we do it, but whatever. I don't think anyone commented on GK's rant post. Did you have any thoughts? The biggest thing that we know NOW at the time we didn't at the time of GK's rant post, is that Spicy, his main (I think?) suspicion is dead. Do you remember earlier in the game, when he said the main difference between town GK and mafia GK is that mafia GK has shit reads? well........... See this is more meta shit though and I am having a lot of trouble taking it all at face value as it seems almost everything directed at him is solely based on meta (aside from his decidedly odd play during this game). Is it likely that's he'd out himself like this if he knew how Spicy was going to flip? ALso marv do you have anything to say about the CONTENT of his rant post? Also what did you mean by 'even if Dandel is 100% mafia?' This isn't "meta shit". This is GK's *own* description of his play. In *this* game. sorry, i should add that 'outing himself like this' devolves quite a lot into wifom. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:39 GMT
#2443
On May 25 2013 01:38 s0Lstice wrote: if its 5-4-1 I think we are fucked regardless. as outlined we have a better chance killing the SK as it would only involve one hero action but yes, we're probably fucked regardless. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:40 GMT
#2444
On May 25 2013 01:39 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2013 01:33 marvellosity wrote: Wave, "him" in that scenario was GK, not Dandel. Oh ok. Syntactic ambiguity. Show nested quote + On May 25 2013 01:35 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:32 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:31 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 25 2013 01:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:18 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 25 2013 01:14 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:12 WaveofShadow wrote: SO, LOOKING FOR SCUM GK comes back to announce a RB and then disappears until tomorrow at whch point he will 'solve the game.' I really don't know what to make of this. After his rant the other day I was beginning to think he was town despite the meta cases looking good against him because I know what it feels like to have people jump down your throat every game, and that post is a reaction I could see myself resorting to. I have been wrong about this sort of read before (Clarity in LXI) so I don't know if I can trust those gut feels though. At this point I almost feel like if we can finally discern what the fuck is going on with GK we'll be that much closer to figuring all this shit out. Would anyone like to discuss? This is true, the problem is killing Dandel is still the right play even if we pinned him as 100% mafia right now. I've got 45 minutes till I'm off work so happy to talk about anything GK-related in the meantime. I'm open for questions This is a familiar situation between us, marv. It bothers me a little that we've had these discussions multiple times yet pretty much nothing has come of it every time we do it, but whatever. I don't think anyone commented on GK's rant post. Did you have any thoughts? The biggest thing that we know NOW at the time we didn't at the time of GK's rant post, is that Spicy, his main (I think?) suspicion is dead. Do you remember earlier in the game, when he said the main difference between town GK and mafia GK is that mafia GK has shit reads? well........... See this is more meta shit though and I am having a lot of trouble taking it all at face value as it seems almost everything directed at him is solely based on meta (aside from his decidedly odd play during this game). Is it likely that's he'd out himself like this if he knew how Spicy was going to flip? ALso marv do you have anything to say about the CONTENT of his rant post? Also what did you mean by 'even if Dandel is 100% mafia?' This isn't "meta shit". This is GK's *own* description of his play. In *this* game. sorry, i should add that 'outing himself like this' devolves quite a lot into wifom. But I want to look at this just a little. Is that a likely thing for mafia to say knowing the direction he was heading? if GK is mafia he's the most suspicious mafia out of all the mafia who exist. So yes, why not. This argument is a bad one because they can just kill Spicy and have someone use this argument in his favour. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:42 GMT
#2446
On May 25 2013 01:41 s0Lstice wrote: oh right I forgot the JK can block mafia KP how did you forget when i mentioned it in my post like 5 minutes ago :p | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:42 GMT
#2447
Time flies when you're completely fucking doomed. I'm sure that's the saying | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:44 GMT
#2449
On May 25 2013 01:43 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2013 01:40 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:39 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 25 2013 01:33 marvellosity wrote: Wave, "him" in that scenario was GK, not Dandel. Oh ok. Syntactic ambiguity. On May 25 2013 01:35 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:32 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:31 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 25 2013 01:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:18 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 25 2013 01:14 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:12 WaveofShadow wrote: SO, LOOKING FOR SCUM GK comes back to announce a RB and then disappears until tomorrow at whch point he will 'solve the game.' I really don't know what to make of this. After his rant the other day I was beginning to think he was town despite the meta cases looking good against him because I know what it feels like to have people jump down your throat every game, and that post is a reaction I could see myself resorting to. I have been wrong about this sort of read before (Clarity in LXI) so I don't know if I can trust those gut feels though. At this point I almost feel like if we can finally discern what the fuck is going on with GK we'll be that much closer to figuring all this shit out. Would anyone like to discuss? This is true, the problem is killing Dandel is still the right play even if we pinned him as 100% mafia right now. I've got 45 minutes till I'm off work so happy to talk about anything GK-related in the meantime. I'm open for questions This is a familiar situation between us, marv. It bothers me a little that we've had these discussions multiple times yet pretty much nothing has come of it every time we do it, but whatever. I don't think anyone commented on GK's rant post. Did you have any thoughts? The biggest thing that we know NOW at the time we didn't at the time of GK's rant post, is that Spicy, his main (I think?) suspicion is dead. Do you remember earlier in the game, when he said the main difference between town GK and mafia GK is that mafia GK has shit reads? well........... See this is more meta shit though and I am having a lot of trouble taking it all at face value as it seems almost everything directed at him is solely based on meta (aside from his decidedly odd play during this game). Is it likely that's he'd out himself like this if he knew how Spicy was going to flip? ALso marv do you have anything to say about the CONTENT of his rant post? Also what did you mean by 'even if Dandel is 100% mafia?' This isn't "meta shit". This is GK's *own* description of his play. In *this* game. sorry, i should add that 'outing himself like this' devolves quite a lot into wifom. But I want to look at this just a little. Is that a likely thing for mafia to say knowing the direction he was heading? if GK is mafia he's the most suspicious mafia out of all the mafia who exist. So yes, why not. This argument is a bad one because they can just kill Spicy and have someone use this argument in his favour. Alright I see that. You say that GK is the most suspicious out of those who exist (if mafia). Do you have any other reads atm or anyone you'd like to discuss? Not in my 15 minutes before I leave work. Especially as it's kinda futile for the minute anyway. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:58 GMT
#2452
On May 25 2013 01:56 JarJarDrinks wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2013 01:29 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:28 JarJarDrinks wrote: On May 25 2013 00:31 Promethelax wrote: Am I missing something marv? Mafia RBing JK wont hurt since DL would still get blocked correct?If both Roleblocker and Jailkeeper exist, No. However a Roleblocked Jail Keeper's Roleblock will still go through. look at the numbers, i'm assuming dandel's shot doesn't go through every night. mafia still has a shot. So then what did you mean by this: Show nested quote + Did you miss the ruling? Because it really seems like you're saying whatever you can to have us take the one course of action that can immediatelty lose us the game.On May 25 2013 01:22 marvellosity wrote: Anyway, just one more numbers ramble. Say we're on 5-4-1 right now, and we choose to lynch mafia, and say we have a jailkeeper. Jailkeeper autoroleblocks Dandel to save us from 1 kp per night lynch mafia -> 5-3-1, mafia kill town, dandel roleblocked -> 4-3-1 lynch mafia -> 4-2-1, mafia kill town, dandel roleblocked -> 3-2-1 lynch mafia -> 3-1-1, mafia kill town, dandel roleblocked -> 2-1-1 lynch mafia -> 2-0-1, roleblock SK, win! The problem with this scenario is that it magically assumes that mafia will manage not to hit OR roleblock the jailkeeper for 3 consecutive cycles. Now, if we lynch the SK at 5-4-1 lynch SK -> 5-4-0, jailkeeper has to get one hero roleblock/jail and destiny is back in town's hands. what am i missing? what are you not understanding??????? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 16:59 GMT
#2453
On May 25 2013 01:57 s0Lstice wrote: Marv you seemed pretty convinced there are 4. Why? Earlier in the game? 4/16 is standard mafia numbers | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 17:01 GMT
#2454
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 17:03 GMT
#2456
On May 25 2013 02:01 JarJarDrinks wrote: Show nested quote + You say "The problem with this scenario is that it magically assumes that mafia will manage not to hit OR roleblock the jailkeeper for 3 consecutive cycles."On May 25 2013 01:58 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:56 JarJarDrinks wrote: On May 25 2013 01:29 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 01:28 JarJarDrinks wrote: On May 25 2013 00:31 Promethelax wrote: Am I missing something marv? Mafia RBing JK wont hurt since DL would still get blocked correct?If both Roleblocker and Jailkeeper exist, No. However a Roleblocked Jail Keeper's Roleblock will still go through. look at the numbers, i'm assuming dandel's shot doesn't go through every night. mafia still has a shot. So then what did you mean by this: On May 25 2013 01:22 marvellosity wrote: Did you miss the ruling? Because it really seems like you're saying whatever you can to have us take the one course of action that can immediatelty lose us the game.Anyway, just one more numbers ramble. Say we're on 5-4-1 right now, and we choose to lynch mafia, and say we have a jailkeeper. Jailkeeper autoroleblocks Dandel to save us from 1 kp per night lynch mafia -> 5-3-1, mafia kill town, dandel roleblocked -> 4-3-1 lynch mafia -> 4-2-1, mafia kill town, dandel roleblocked -> 3-2-1 lynch mafia -> 3-1-1, mafia kill town, dandel roleblocked -> 2-1-1 lynch mafia -> 2-0-1, roleblock SK, win! The problem with this scenario is that it magically assumes that mafia will manage not to hit OR roleblock the jailkeeper for 3 consecutive cycles. Now, if we lynch the SK at 5-4-1 lynch SK -> 5-4-0, jailkeeper has to get one hero roleblock/jail and destiny is back in town's hands. what am i missing? what are you not understanding??????? But according to the ruling above, mafia roleblocking the JK won't stop DL from getting blocked. Am I reading something wrong? Ah. yes. Ok, this scenario magically assumes mafia will fail to hit the JK 3 cycles in a row (when it is in their best interests to do so). You're right, that bit was incorrect. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 17:04 GMT
#2457
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 17:24 GMT
#2459
On May 25 2013 02:06 Dandel Ion wrote: 2 cycles not 3 hmm? why only 2? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 17:32 GMT
#2460
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 20:06 GMT
#2475
On May 25 2013 02:37 Dandel Ion wrote: Because the block still goes through on the night of his death. yeah he needs 4 blocks total | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 20:07 GMT
#2476
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 20:45 GMT
#2482
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 21:46 GMT
#2484
he's trying to be all useful with what we should do, but actually he's not being useful, he's posting shit for the sake of posting shit. yukyukyuk | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 24 2013 22:34 GMT
#2486
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 25 2013 10:04 GMT
#2515
On May 25 2013 18:16 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2013 14:54 goodkarma wrote: Then of the pool of remaining people I find it a little hard to fathom Solstice playing this well as scum having never played it before. He's stayed uncontroversial / unnoticed for the most part for sure, but he's still been semi-helpful / pro-town for most of the game, as well as fairly active. I'm leaning on him being town, but I could definitely be wrong. This is actually really insightful from GK and reading through his filter a very accurate conclusion, where i disagree is his conclusion. That is exactly the kind of things I look out for when I look for scum. I actually think we should lynch s0lstice. What do you think marv? I actually think s0lstice is town, partly from his general play, partly from the really dumb fight he got into with me. As a general note about myself, I'm not apathetic, this is the lynch we need to make today and there's a reasonably decent chance we won't even be here tomorrow to find de mafioso. If we are around tomorrow to do so, then we can look in earnest. I only reference the players who thought I was blates town because it should be pretty obvious I'm town, and it's obvious enough that other players agreed with me. GK's characterisation of my play is terribly weak. Thing is, GK, I can easily make some 1000 word post talking about every player in the game and coming to any conclusion I like. That's really really easy. You continually make these large list posts calling townies mafia. You don't actually push anything for shit, GK. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 25 2013 10:07 GMT
#2516
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 25 2013 17:25 GMT
#2531
On May 26 2013 01:15 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2013 19:04 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2013 18:16 DarthPunk wrote: On May 25 2013 14:54 goodkarma wrote: Then of the pool of remaining people I find it a little hard to fathom Solstice playing this well as scum having never played it before. He's stayed uncontroversial / unnoticed for the most part for sure, but he's still been semi-helpful / pro-town for most of the game, as well as fairly active. I'm leaning on him being town, but I could definitely be wrong. This is actually really insightful from GK and reading through his filter a very accurate conclusion, where i disagree is his conclusion. That is exactly the kind of things I look out for when I look for scum. I actually think we should lynch s0lstice. What do you think marv? I actually think s0lstice is town, partly from his general play, partly from the really dumb fight he got into with me. As a general note about myself, I'm not apathetic, this is the lynch we need to make today and there's a reasonably decent chance we won't even be here tomorrow to find de mafioso. If we are around tomorrow to do so, then we can look in earnest. I only reference the players who thought I was blates town because it should be pretty obvious I'm town, and it's obvious enough that other players agreed with me. GK's characterisation of my play is terribly weak. Thing is, GK, I can easily make some 1000 word post talking about every player in the game and coming to any conclusion I like. That's really really easy. You continually make these large list posts calling townies mafia. You don't actually push anything for shit, GK. Marv what the fuck? Why not start today if there's people who won't be around tomorrow? I really don't understand your shutting down of discussion constantly; it's really starting to bother me. I agree with your point about GK, but what have you done lately aside from pop in now and then without really contributing? I have had no doubts you were town the entire game but your play recently now has me second-guessing myself. Is this the best explanation you have for your mindset right now? yep, i'm a pragmatist | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 25 2013 18:07 GMT
#2534
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 14:40 GMT
#2598
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 14:47 GMT
#2599
On May 26 2013 12:11 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2013 12:04 s0Lstice wrote: On my phone atm. Your filter looks fine DP, but your reads and mine right now are so opposite that I have to wonder. Like I said earlier, I'm having to find scum from a bunch of former town reads. I'm frustrated because if there 4 scum like we think (probably are, dandels play makes no sense otherwise), then town has effectively already lost this game. I really do think marv is scum. If anyone, he should have been the voice of reason during the whole bh thing. He even said in the mason qt that there was a perfectly townie reason for the slip, and that was that BH literally didn't give a shit about the game when it happened....enough that he didn't know how many people were in the game. I made the mistake of assuming that he would at least know its a 16 player game he was in. Let me ask you something else. Was it obvious to you that iamp was a town mason? On night 1, iamp dies and you are roleblocked dp. Is it more likely that the scum team saw iamps claim and switched targets (plus the roleblock) in the 7 minutes they had, or that they knew the entire time because marv is scum. After the slip, the first thing marv did in thread was nitpick a tiny semantics issue in something I posted. He didn't even care to read what I said right, despite saying to iamp in mason qt that everyone should keep an eye on me. Is this town marv to you? BH scumslips, kind of a big deal, and he puts it aside to talk about something inconsequential. He doesn't even comment definitively on the slip until you drag it out of him dp. There's been other times too where he's had uncharacteristic reading comprehension errors. It just doesn't seem like town marv to me. This. I had actually come up with this point myself because if we take that factor alone, it honestly seems more likely that scum already knew about the mason than picked him up with like 5 min to go until deadline. Again, I'm not convinced that marv is scum atm, but that's a pretty big point against him right now. I was willing to throw all reasonable doubt aside at that point in the game because like you said, DP, he really did appear to be a shining example of all that town stands for, but marv's seeming lack of caring about the game recently has forced me to think about these things. He is by no means my primary scumread atm, that honour still goes to JJD right now, but I would very much like for him to come back and show us why he isn't scum. This is absolute nonsense. It's quite the opposite. Go read the QT with iamp, halfway through the day he asked me if he should out himself as mason to the thread to see what reactions he got, and I told him not to. It would rather be in my interest as mafia to have iamp out himself in the middle of the night, and he god-damn offered to do it. Your thinking here is *way* off. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 14:53 GMT
#2600
Given the SK actually ISN'T Dandel, the shot(s) last night make zero sense. Why wasn't the SK shooting for mafia? (i.e Dandel!) | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 15:59 GMT
#2602
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 16:06 GMT
#2606
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 16:13 GMT
#2608
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 16:16 GMT
#2610
On May 27 2013 01:14 s0Lstice wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2013 23:47 marvellosity wrote: On May 26 2013 12:11 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 26 2013 12:04 s0Lstice wrote: On my phone atm. Your filter looks fine DP, but your reads and mine right now are so opposite that I have to wonder. Like I said earlier, I'm having to find scum from a bunch of former town reads. I'm frustrated because if there 4 scum like we think (probably are, dandels play makes no sense otherwise), then town has effectively already lost this game. I really do think marv is scum. If anyone, he should have been the voice of reason during the whole bh thing. He even said in the mason qt that there was a perfectly townie reason for the slip, and that was that BH literally didn't give a shit about the game when it happened....enough that he didn't know how many people were in the game. I made the mistake of assuming that he would at least know its a 16 player game he was in. Let me ask you something else. Was it obvious to you that iamp was a town mason? On night 1, iamp dies and you are roleblocked dp. Is it more likely that the scum team saw iamps claim and switched targets (plus the roleblock) in the 7 minutes they had, or that they knew the entire time because marv is scum. After the slip, the first thing marv did in thread was nitpick a tiny semantics issue in something I posted. He didn't even care to read what I said right, despite saying to iamp in mason qt that everyone should keep an eye on me. Is this town marv to you? BH scumslips, kind of a big deal, and he puts it aside to talk about something inconsequential. He doesn't even comment definitively on the slip until you drag it out of him dp. There's been other times too where he's had uncharacteristic reading comprehension errors. It just doesn't seem like town marv to me. This. I had actually come up with this point myself because if we take that factor alone, it honestly seems more likely that scum already knew about the mason than picked him up with like 5 min to go until deadline. Again, I'm not convinced that marv is scum atm, but that's a pretty big point against him right now. I was willing to throw all reasonable doubt aside at that point in the game because like you said, DP, he really did appear to be a shining example of all that town stands for, but marv's seeming lack of caring about the game recently has forced me to think about these things. He is by no means my primary scumread atm, that honour still goes to JJD right now, but I would very much like for him to come back and show us why he isn't scum. This is absolute nonsense. It's quite the opposite. Go read the QT with iamp, halfway through the day he asked me if he should out himself as mason to the thread to see what reactions he got, and I told him not to. It would rather be in my interest as mafia to have iamp out himself in the middle of the night, and he god-damn offered to do it. Your thinking here is *way* off. Pretty sure scum you would have told him to wait as well. Otherwise you're in the shit when he gets NK'd because you advocated for a blue to reveal himself early for no reason. why? I could happily have said "sure why not, could be interesting". It's not like it was my idea. If you carry on being terrible I'm going to have to assume you're mafia I'm afraid. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 16:19 GMT
#2612
On May 27 2013 01:17 s0Lstice wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2013 23:53 marvellosity wrote: Now this SK thing is weird. Does/did/do mafia actually have 2 kp and there isn't an SK? Given the SK actually ISN'T Dandel, the shot(s) last night make zero sense. Why wasn't the SK shooting for mafia? (i.e Dandel!) Aside from the OP thing pointed out, when you wrote this, what were you thinking the motivation was for Dandel to claim scum? Like, he doesn't do it unless it helps his team in some way. Really the only way it helps his team is if there is an SK, no? There is like no upside to losing a mafia member that I can think of. He basically claimed mafia when he laughed at BH flipping town; SK could have shot at Dandel there and then (and should have *shakes fist*). At which point the game would still absolutely be in town's hands | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 16:24 GMT
#2614
On May 27 2013 01:23 s0Lstice wrote: Show nested quote + On May 27 2013 01:19 marvellosity wrote: On May 27 2013 01:17 s0Lstice wrote: On May 26 2013 23:53 marvellosity wrote: Now this SK thing is weird. Does/did/do mafia actually have 2 kp and there isn't an SK? Given the SK actually ISN'T Dandel, the shot(s) last night make zero sense. Why wasn't the SK shooting for mafia? (i.e Dandel!) Aside from the OP thing pointed out, when you wrote this, what were you thinking the motivation was for Dandel to claim scum? Like, he doesn't do it unless it helps his team in some way. Really the only way it helps his team is if there is an SK, no? There is like no upside to losing a mafia member that I can think of. He basically claimed mafia when he laughed at BH flipping town; SK could have shot at Dandel there and then (and should have *shakes fist*). At which point the game would still absolutely be in town's hands This is exactly what I mean. It only takes a little critical thinking to see that the only way Dandel's play makes sense is for there to be an SK...but instead you ruminate about there being no SK and 2 mafia kp? It's like you didn't really consider it critically at all. You so scummy marv <3 Dandel's play doesn't make sense if there's an SK either you idiot | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 16:28 GMT
#2616
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 16:28 GMT
#2617
On May 27 2013 01:27 s0Lstice wrote: Why not? Dandel claiming SK made sure we lynched scum and not the SK yesterday. We already talked about how the most optimal lynch for town yesterday was to off the SK, as it could get us to 5-4 with some luck. Now the best we can hope for is 4-3-1. BECAUSE HE CLAIMED NOT-TOWN WHEN BH FLIPPED WHICH WAS THE START OF THE NIGHT SK should have shot him. I JUST WROTE THIS. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 16:32 GMT
#2618
At this point it's totally apparent he's not town. Comprendo? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 16:41 GMT
#2619
On a separate note, JK (should he exist) should try jailing offensively tonight | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 16:55 GMT
#2624
if mafia don't have to worry about town so much then they have more luxury to pursue other goals. your argument is that you're calling my arguments bad because Dandel's play made sense if there's an SK. Claiming mafia (to the SK) during the night doesn't make any sense from a mafia perspective, because you're painting a target on your back. So, the OP aside, it wasn't in any way unreasonable for me to speculate that mafia could have had 2 KP, given mafia could have lost a mafia for free last night because of Dandel outing himself as not-town at the start of the night. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 16:56 GMT
#2625
On May 27 2013 01:47 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 27 2013 01:27 s0Lstice wrote: Why not? Dandel claiming SK made sure we lynched scum and not the SK yesterday. We already talked about how the most optimal lynch for town yesterday was to off the SK, as it could get us to 5-4 with some luck. Now the best we can hope for is 4-3-1. this is fucking retarded because we have not made any read on a sk whatsoever. LIke there is no reason for scum to sac themselves. A more reasonable explanation is that he knew he was fucked from being so useless and tried to survive with his sk claim. This, there was literally nothing to lose for Dandel. There was a real possibility that town could have figured it was an ok idea to let the SK live, and we lynch someone else and hit town, when basically mafia have won at that stage. Given he was 100% being lynched at that point anyway, it was worth a try, because why not | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 17:03 GMT
#2626
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 17:07 GMT
#2629
On May 27 2013 02:06 DarthPunk wrote: Why do you say that? because it seems apparent that he didn't think it was a particularly good idea for the SK to shoot at mafia last night, and the SK shot at town, so... | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 17:09 GMT
#2631
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 22:47 GMT
#2644
Mafia know who SK is because possibly mafia don't have a roleblocker, or if they did they didn't use it on GK. I think Stutters jailed GK. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 22:53 GMT
#2647
On May 27 2013 07:51 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 27 2013 07:47 marvellosity wrote: My money is on GK being SK, and he claimed roleblock yesterday to make it look like he couldn't be SK. Mafia know who SK is because possibly mafia don't have a roleblocker, or if they did they didn't use it on GK. I think Stutters jailed GK. Due to his final post? I was thinking along the same lines, but more importantly I have been Yeah, and neither DP or I were roleblocked, which is where Stutters' first two night actions came from (I'm assuming). We're pretty obvious protect targets, and I told the JK to jail offensively tonight, so I'm assuming he did so. The thing about killing the SK is that it likely means that mafia win after the night kill. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 22:54 GMT
#2648
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 22:56 GMT
#2650
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 26 2013 23:06 GMT
#2653
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 27 2013 10:29 GMT
#2657
I think we've had everyone check in but grush, and one roleblock claimed; so GK's rb on night 2 is an 'extra' roleblock. Of course it's possible that Stutters was roleblocked, but unfortunately we'll never know. JJD and GK are my main trains of thought today, if at least one of them isn't anti-town i'll eat Blazinghand's hat. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 27 2013 22:18 GMT
#2666
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 27 2013 22:25 GMT
#2668
On May 28 2013 07:22 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2013 06:13 goodkarma wrote: I highly doubt there's two town QT-makers. Further, I doubt Rayne was vigi'd, meaning that the presence of three scum and a serial killer is possible. Therefore, BH is likely scum. ##Vote: BH I keep coming back to this post and the point at which he made it. He was fabricating what the setup was about far before we had any sort of extensive information, I really doubt that any town person makes this post. What I am trying to figure out is if he is the SK or mafia. There are a couple of things that make me think mafia, especially how he orders his lynch targets. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 01:18 GMT
#2670
On May 28 2013 10:01 s0Lstice wrote: Show nested quote + On May 28 2013 07:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 28 2013 07:22 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 21 2013 06:13 goodkarma wrote: I highly doubt there's two town QT-makers. Further, I doubt Rayne was vigi'd, meaning that the presence of three scum and a serial killer is possible. Therefore, BH is likely scum. ##Vote: BH I keep coming back to this post and the point at which he made it. He was fabricating what the setup was about far before we had any sort of extensive information, I really doubt that any town person makes this post. What I am trying to figure out is if he is the SK or mafia. There are a couple of things that make me think mafia, especially how he orders his lynch targets. Can you elaborate a bit Marv? What about the ordering of his lynch targets says mafia over SK. WoS-- It can't be a coincidence that just about everyone in this game has wanted to kill GK at some point. This is just a guess, but my gut tells me that he is the SK, and the scum team pegged him early. The best way for them to deal with the SK is to lynch him, for obvious reasons....hence all the heat he has been getting from all sides. From this point onward, the moment scum can get the SK in the noose, they win. It really worries me that GK is such a popular candidate for today. I feel pretty confident that GK is not town, but only marginally confident that he is SK over scum. Speaking of Marv, he is who I'd like to kill today, but it's not going to happen. DP's vote in particular would be needed, and he is not willing. I'm nervous enough about GK being the SK that I don't want to kill him today. I'm thinking a Marv/JJ/one of vayne/grush as the remaining scum. As such I'm happy to lynch JJ today with you WoS. ##vote JarJarDrinks Ooh, someone here just before I go to bed. How lovely. Earlyish on Day 1 with the 2 lurkers, he wants to kill sputnik ahead of JJD, before JJD became a scumread. There's a point on day 1 where GK's top scumread suddenly becomes Spicy, and he specifically places him ahead of Jarjar/Dandel - so some townie gets pride of place ahead of 1 (2) mafia. On to day 2, he wants to lynch Dandel *after* 'claimed scum' BH. He in fact calls Dandel "very very scummy", but apparently 2 town masons is that much more unlikely to him, so despite this BH is his 100% choice of lynch on day 2. Today he's very much left his options open, there always seems to be a scumteam but we don't actually know who GK wants to lynch. One interesting thing which may or may not be relevant is that at some point a couple of days ago (or whenever it was) he twice mentioned that he would talk later about who he felt the SK was, but he never followed up on this. There are a couple of other things that I really don't/didn't like about GK, namely - he kept making references (at least 3-4 times) to his other scumgames, despite the fact no-one was bringing them up - he kept using the fact he hadn't read his role PM as a defence I also noted two things at separate points in his filter, I noted when he went after BH on Day 1 - "jesus fuck does he never end. seeing where the shit sticks?" Then later I note to myself "GK is usually so fucking deliberate, yet he changed targets so many times on day 1." What's interesting is that when he's defending himself, he says But what you wouldn't have seen is me throwing around votes as hard as I did or changing my stances like I did. I've played enough to know better than to make a bajillion vote switches as scum. I would have been far more cautious. This was interesting to me because as I recall, it wasn't really anyone's contention that he was mafia for this reason; in fact he brought it up himself as if he was very much aware of it. Also why is it to "know better" not to do this? - often it's a townie trait to switch votes a lot. Just the way he's self-aware of what he's doing and defending himself based on it is pretty dodgy. Your bolded quote is actually a pretty compelling reason for him to be SK and not mafia though. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 08:47 GMT
#2694
On May 28 2013 12:53 goodkarma wrote: I've defended myself about as much as I care to. If you were to look at the way Dandel must have been "bussing" me if I were scum, it just doesn't fit. He made such a haphazard case that was utterly bad. Like wouldn't he be more likely to coordinate / care about this type of action if we were both scum? It would be far more likely that if we were both scum he wouldn't site reasons for lynching me that don't even exist (a "scumslip" that never happened). And yeah, if you'd assume I'd lie about a RB, maybe I could be SK. But what would be my motive for lying? And if I only lied once, which would have to be the case, where did the other RB from day 2 go??? Neither theory makes any sense. You pretty much have to assume I'm a compulsive liar to be SK, and Dandel's actions don't really make sense if we're both scum. And this "He is self-aware of all these things. Therefore, he must be cleverly planning all of this out and tricking us..." kind of logic that seems to be used repeatedly by Marv doesn't really make sense to me. It's like all of this is out there in the open. The SK stuff is especially obvious. Like come on. How hard is it for you guys to figure out I'm not scum? You can talk yourself into some corner that I am some kind of super-clever scumster, or you can just accept that I really don't fit as scum. Maybe I wouldn't have to point this stuff out if you were a little more thorough with your assessment. It deeply bothers me that Marv is pushing this lynch. As far as vote switching and whatnot scummy stuff you have to say about my filter, I've already discussed where I was coming from on all of that. If you feel that my stances were scummy whatever. I've said all I'm going to on that. And regarding my early talk about SK theory, I did discuss that a little bit. It was revolving around speculation on the death of Rayne. But really, I didn't have anything more to bring up on that subject than I already did. To find both SK and scum, my approach has been to use process of elimination to determine who's non-town in this game. I don't feel very good about Marv/Solstice right now. Both have done townie things, and rather non-townie things. I am more confident with JJD/Vayne being non-town right now. And if there's been some "wishy-washy" language here and there, it's because it hasn't been easy for me this game to spot out scum. As such, my assessments and theories have been changing quite a bit. Whatever happens, we're in LYLO, so we'd best come to some kind of consensus on who to vote today. I'm most confident with JJD/Vayne being scum. Solstice I'm a bit more on the fence on. I actually felt some of the arguing he made that DP and Marv were both scum was townie, as I don't visualize a scum sticking his neck out like that. Yet... up until that point he seemed to blend in so darned well... I'll sheep Wave, who I'm confident is town.: ##Vote: JJD My issue with this entire post is that it really addresses little to nothing of what's been said about you. In pretty short: - dandel sacked himself, you can't defend yourself with his actions - saying the logic I use doesn't make sense to you without saying why not isn't a defence. The fact is you're defending yourself from things you're under attack from, repeatedly; i.e. voting a billion times and your previous scumgames. Saying "you don't fit as scum" and other things which you repeatedly say are just baseless statements. - you said you'd talk about SK twice on the 3rd page of your filter, which i assume was after rayne went killed (or if it wasn't, you should be lynched for activity alone ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 08:48 GMT
#2695
What's your stab at a mafia team and/or SK? I'm assuming it has to include someone you previously assumed to be town, so I'd like to know. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 08:49 GMT
#2696
Justify yourself. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 09:34 GMT
#2699
- The fact is you're defending yourself from things you're *not* under attack from | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 09:36 GMT
#2700
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 09:59 GMT
#2702
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 10:07 GMT
#2704
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 10:07 GMT
#2705
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 10:26 GMT
#2707
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 14:43 GMT
#2716
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 14:44 GMT
#2717
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 14:46 GMT
#2719
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 14:54 GMT
#2721
On May 28 2013 23:54 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 28 2013 23:46 marvellosity wrote: s0lstice, don't waste your time writing a case on me, it'll be genuinely terrible. Lol this fucking attitude marv. Nothing but shutting people down all game, how is this not suspicious? why don't you just read any of my many games in the universe ever? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 14:55 GMT
#2722
On May 28 2013 23:44 marvellosity wrote: s0lstice, for what reasons is DP your strongest townread (give or take) and I'm your biggest scumread? What's the massive difference between us? s0lstice I want an answer to this in particular | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:05 GMT
#2724
On May 29 2013 00:04 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 28 2013 23:54 marvellosity wrote: On May 28 2013 23:54 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 28 2013 23:46 marvellosity wrote: s0lstice, don't waste your time writing a case on me, it'll be genuinely terrible. Lol this fucking attitude marv. Nothing but shutting people down all game, how is this not suspicious? why don't you just read any of my many games in the universe ever? I can't, I'm on my bb So this is how you generally play? How is shutting down thread discussion a productive town way of playing I'm not shutting down thread discussion, I'm saying s0lstice is bad. Anyway I don't have much more to say about it until he converses with me a little, because I have stuff to ask him. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:06 GMT
#2727
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:10 GMT
#2729
s0lstice apparently has me as the highest chance of anyone to flip mafia. I'm his top scumread despite the 3 players in the game who have played with me 10-15+ games each (BH, iamp, DP) declaring me *certain* town. Not "marv probably town" but god-damn town. This is in contrast to s0lstice's read on DP which is strongly town. What's the genuine difference between me and DP? We both wanted to kill sputnik day 1, and BH day 2, and Dandel day 3; further I've been significantly more active than DP, and DP's interest has self-admittedly been waning recently. Not only this, but from s0lstice's pespective, in what is basically lylo, DP is voting s0lstice on a not-very-fleshed-out case. Shouldn't it be ringing alarm bells for s0lstice that on day 4 DP is voting him for apparently not very much? He doesn't seem to be very worried about it. If I were a townie, this would be setting off pretty loud alarm bells in my head, no? Yet there seems to be no suspicion. Why?? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:10 GMT
#2730
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:12 GMT
#2732
On May 29 2013 00:09 s0Lstice wrote: Marv- It's a feel thing in relation to the BH scum slip. To me, a townie making a 'scumslip' should be like a live hand grenade to the actual scum team. I don't see scum pursuing it with such passion directly in the heat of the moment. Going all in right off the bat seems unlikely for scum, since they are well aware of the attention they would get when the eventual flip happens. DP went after it with gusto. Talk to me about this though...did you get the same feeling? Question: what should scum do if the response of people later in the game is the one you're giving now? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:12 GMT
#2733
On May 29 2013 00:11 s0Lstice wrote: I asked DP to explain hisself Marv. I'm afraid he's cruising on the SS Confirmation Bias though. no, "asking him to explain himself" is jack shit. It's 6 hours from lynch and you're apparently blissfully unconcerned about it, apart from wanting him to explain himself. it stinks. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:15 GMT
#2735
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:18 GMT
#2738
On May 29 2013 00:16 WaveofShadow wrote: DP clam down. Marv what's the point of that? I'm assuming you don't think DP is scum for his vote on solstice. For the record I find you more likely to be scum than DP as well but I'm not putting you ahead of others atm that's because you're bad too the point is a town s0lstice has no reason to have DP as a massive townread compared to me as a massive scumread when the only difference is that DP did most of the pursuing of BH, and further from his perspective DP is trying to lynch a townie at LYLO (or whatever this purgatory is). It's not consistent and shows a marked lack of paranoia about DP's alignment in this situation | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:19 GMT
#2741
On May 29 2013 00:16 WaveofShadow wrote: DP clam down. Marv what's the point of that? I'm assuming you don't think DP is scum for his vote on solstice. For the record I find you more likely to be scum than DP as well but I'm not putting you ahead of others atm Like, if one of the strongest players left in the game was trying to lynch you today, would you have them as a strong town read? With just a casual request for an explanation? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:21 GMT
#2743
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:32 GMT
#2748
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:40 GMT
#2750
##Vote: goodkarma | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 15:40 GMT
#2751
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 16:02 GMT
#2757
s0lstice thinks DP's pursuit of BH was genuine which was fair enough, but is it really his contention that I was putting that shit on with Dandel and that *wasn't* genuine? I only ever lose my shit / heavily insult someone when I'm town, and that can be verified by a really quick skim of any of my games. I never go over the top as mafia because I consider it unsportsmanlike. And if I hadn't been drinking I'd have restrained myself this time too, but whatevs. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 16:07 GMT
#2760
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 16:11 GMT
#2762
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 16:31 GMT
#2764
As well as this please explain in particular why it's likely you are correct in contrast to 3 strong players (2 of which have flipped town) who have played dozens of games with me who were convinced I'm town, please also explain how you view the marv/Dandel argument. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:00 GMT
#2771
"there are so many things that seem ridiculous to me", I'd like to know what these are especially | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:15 GMT
#2774
As for the rest of it, it's just a convenient narrative that I can't argue against; suffice to say everything can easily be given with the town explanation. Regarding the QT thing, I said to BH himself that the slip looked pretty fucking bad. Don't cherrypick. On May 19 2013 23:41 iamperfection wrote: You don't think scum mason is likely? What do you think would be the likely amount of blues in a 16 man and do you think there could be two town masons? this post made it pretty likely that iamp was blue, and also that iamp was mason, and you may be able to tell from my response to it that I'd figured it out as well. Further, look at the very first post in the QT - iamp had guessed that I'd worked it out as well. It wasn't rocket science. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:17 GMT
#2776
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:18 GMT
#2777
now you're giving me examples of a billion posts across your filter to repeat consolidated consolidated | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:27 GMT
#2780
one of them was a post concluding with "i think the scummy things work out" one of them was a post about the DI lynch that I didn't think was that atrocious one of them was a post that I actually responded to asking you questions in the first place. how am I being a douche when I asked you perfectly nicely for some consolidated reasons, and you just started swearing at me? Get a grip. To repeat, you said there are "so many things that seem ridiculous to me" you pointed out one you find ridiculous, what are the other 'so many'? Because in those posts alone your conclusions weren't as firm as you're making them out to be now. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:28 GMT
#2781
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:29 GMT
#2782
On May 29 2013 03:00 marvellosity wrote: WoS, I'm struggling to find any sort of consolidated case on JJD in your filter. Can you throw some points together? "there are so many things that seem ridiculous to me", I'd like to know what these are especially is baiting you into arguing, I have no idea where your head is at. It couldn't be much more polite. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:31 GMT
#2784
So don't give me this "players who think they are too good to listen" bullcrap, WoS. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:32 GMT
#2785
Did you think of that, hmm? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:36 GMT
#2787
I don't understand why that was so much to ask. I mean if it really is too difficult to show me 4 or 5 examples of ridiculous posts, then just say so and I can think about something else. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:41 GMT
#2789
Now we've argued for a page because you decided that ranting at me for ignoring you and not reading or whatever was a more productive thing than just engaging with my original point. I'm not here to bloody battle with you, I'm here trying to engage you on your read because I'm interested, except you did your best to shut me down by shouting at me for no particular reason, and that sucks. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:55 GMT
#2792
As for the first two - would you suggest he left his vote wasted on BH when no-one else was voting him? What would you expect a townie JJD who was convinced of BH's guilt to do at that stage? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 18:56 GMT
#2793
On May 29 2013 03:52 WaveofShadow wrote: Call it a 'feels' thing from me if you must, marv, but I feel like JJD's posting all game has been needlessly aggressive, following town sentiment when it's convenient but flagrantly against town sentiment at other times, and overall it seems like he only reads the thread and explains himself when pressured to. The 'ridiculousness' stems from the fact where he is just being weird with his aggression and the times where he gets called out for not reading, and then is forced to. also this made me lol. this was originally my contention way back when, and you weren't sure what i was talking about. remember? ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 19:03 GMT
#2794
Probably we need to lynch between JJD and GK. They're the least 2 active people by far. One is probably mafia and one is probably SK. eenie meenie miney mo | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 19:07 GMT
#2795
GK is basically just voting to save himself by voting for JJD JJD is voting for s0lstice instead of just voting to save himself by voting for GK ergo GK is more likely SK as his only remit is to survive, JJD would have a team behind him so he doesn't have to play that way ##unvote ##Vote: jarjardrinks | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 20:13 GMT
#2800
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 20:18 GMT
#2803
On May 29 2013 05:18 s0Lstice wrote: I don't like that your vote counts at all, what a coincidence Vayne! I honestly think this lynch is between a townie and the SK. you think JJD is town? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 20:24 GMT
#2806
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 20:52 GMT
#2817
On May 29 2013 05:38 s0Lstice wrote: if you (WoS) and DP are town, and I didnt fuck up those reads, then that leaves marv/GK/JJ/grush/vayne. If JJ is town, then the rest are scum. well i assure you i'm town, so think again. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 20:53 GMT
#2818
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 21:01 GMT
#2820
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 21:03 GMT
#2822
hey SK, do us a favour bro ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 21:07 GMT
#2823
those of you on GK can do the math | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 21:17 GMT
#2826
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 21:17 GMT
#2827
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 21:18 GMT
#2828
On May 29 2013 06:17 WaveofShadow wrote: what? there was a flip already, it's not endgame. marv care to elaborate on your math? Fuck this game imo, I don't knwo why people dont listen to me. Solstice i was going to ask you ebfore lynch if you had read any of the discussion between marv and I. You still voted GK and thought JJD is town despite our conversation if you did read it, and if you didn't read it or ignored it with 1h to lynch it looks shitty. There IS no endgame until one of the SK and mafia have won. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 28 2013 21:18 GMT
#2829
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 08:40 GMT
#2834
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 09:24 GMT
#2835
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 13:03 GMT
#2838
Assume I'm town because I am, who are your anti-town elements in the game? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 13:56 GMT
#2840
By that I mean lol. You *still* have more posts in your 9 player newbie game which lasted ~30 pages than you do in this entire game; you've made 60 posts across 4 cycles. This very much tallies with the idea that you're mafia and sitting in your QT posting like you did in your mafia newbie game where you posted much less (much like this game :o) You spent several posts at the start of the game assuring us how much your activity would increase during the week, but your contributions have steadily decreased as the game went on. Pull another leg. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 14:32 GMT
#2841
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 16:24 GMT
#2843
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 16:28 GMT
#2844
Vayne also refused my overtures to switch his vote to JJD, and then disappeared completely for the flip. To me it's not natural at all for a townie to be present very close before the flip but then subsequently not be around at all for the flip to see what happened and to comment on it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 17:01 GMT
#2847
By the way I'm going to say this now in case I forget later, and this is the first night in a while I feel like I have a reasonable chance of being killed: townies should remember to no-lynch where appropriate. I've checked and we can ##vote: no-lynch, so if the game somehow gets down to a 2-1-1 situation, town must absolutely vote for a no-lynch and hope to get lucky, because lynching anyone loses immediately. By posting this I'm also hopefully forcing mafia/SK to follow along with this in the hope that they stay hidden from all other factions. Don't forget! | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 19:16 GMT
#2858
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 20:59 GMT
#2861
WaveofShadow: I think he's town, could be SK but who knows, but I'm guessing town. Has weird spikes of activity but I don't think that means much. Seems genuinely frustrated at the game, and was on JJD instead of GK, which gets him some points. s0lstice: I've come round to the idea that at least he's not-mafia. He may be SK, but he could well be town too. I'd hedge my bets on town, but meh. A lot of his posts feel sincere and genuine, his thought process is laid out and doesn't look contrived. There's a couple of things that leave me unsure, namely his weird game-long pursuit of me and him suddenly declaring JJD town yesterday when it was obviously a quite important moment. grush - fuck this guy. Whatever. JJD - kill with fire. Cherry on the cake is stupid SK direction. Vayne - after some truly wtf moments at the start of the game I had him written off as town and I think I could well have been wrong to do so. I don't really get what there is of his analysis, he was supposed to be a night-kill person but I've seen nothing particularly illuminating. He was on GK yesterday, and he seems to be making reads in a total vacuum. I no longer think he's town. This is without a proper filter read, but I wanted it down. DarthPunk - I bold this guy because here's where it gets interesting. The whole game, me included until recently, has had him written off as town. I've basically not read his filter at all, but some things to note: - he's one of the few people in the game who could pull off that BH pursuit as mafia - his activity and interest has been flagging, but he wasn't upfront and blase about it as I might expect a townie to be. He only made his excuse after both me and... WoS was it? called him out on it. - his s0lstice attitude. s0lstice was mafia all of a sudden, but on Day 4 we only got a case out of him when he was prodded for it. Now in this night phase, he's come round to thinking s0lstice isn't mafia, following MY sentiment, and also following a "reread of his filter" and recent posting. Personally I don't think s0lstice's posting has changed THAT much, and, further, it's a pretty convenient time for him to find s0lstice town now AFTER the lynch. The whole flip flop makes very little sense to me. - he's alive! DP has been by and large the one universal town read all game, and yet consistently he's not been killed off. Why? (I'm aware this can be to an extent applied to me too, but I've had significantly more heat). I don't get why mafia would leave DP alive for so long. He could well be hiding behind the fact that *I'm* alive - notice how he consistently calls me confirmed town virtually, and seems frustrated when people are suspicious of me. Now I'm loathe to quote mafia scum as a reference, but from their WIFOM section wiki: You are a Townie in three-player LyLo with two other players who have cross-voted - who you vote for will decide the game. One of them has looked moderately scummy throughout the entire game and appeared to fly under the radar, while the other one has for the most part looked extremely pro-Town throughout - enough to make you wonder why they were never targeted by a night kill. Who should you vote for? Caveat: A surprising proportion of the time, the correct answer is to lynch the one who looks extremely pro-Town. When it gets this late in the game, nightkills aren't really WIFOM anymore; there's a consistent pattern of a universal town read who's a strong player being mysteriously left alive. - I would note he can't be SK, as Stutters jailed him N1 (I'm assuming). Again, I've not read his filter, but a bunch of these things have been adding up recently. I'm also well aware that I may be about to look extremely stupid if DP is night-killed tonight, in which case... I'm an idiot. But given he's basically been above question all game, I needed to bring this up, because I don't trust DP at all anymore. One more thing - don't forget to no-lynch at 2-1-1 if that's where you get to. Probably this was all a waste of time, but there you have it folks. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:00 GMT
#2862
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:01 GMT
#2863
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:01 GMT
#2864
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:01 GMT
#2865
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:01 GMT
#2866
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:03 GMT
#2870
JarJar you're a donkey. Glad I got DP and Vayne at the end, but a terrible game from me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:04 GMT
#2872
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:06 GMT
#2881
On May 30 2013 06:04 sciberbia wrote: gg all. entertaining game to watch. In particular I found it interesting how scum somehow managed to convince town that there was an SK out there somewhere. It does say scum KP is fixed at 1. And I did offer up the thought that it could have been mafia KP and I was shut down. I think town was terribly weak with its roles this game (both masons are non-confirmed) and should DEFINITELY have had KP. Town needed a vigilante. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:07 GMT
#2883
On May 30 2013 06:04 Blazinghand wrote: and of course since DP is 3p survivor he doesn't need to change his thing. lynching me, the town MVP for this game, was still a shit move by town though lol, get a grip. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:09 GMT
#2888
On May 30 2013 06:08 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 30 2013 06:07 marvellosity wrote: On May 30 2013 06:04 Blazinghand wrote: and of course since DP is 3p survivor he doesn't need to change his thing. lynching me, the town MVP for this game, was still a shit move by town though lol, get a grip. I really was the best town player this game! you really weren't. by any stretch. irritating to start solving this game too late, but never mind. should have paid more attention to Vayne earlier. Had s0lstice/Vayne/JJD/DP right in the end, only WoS and grush needed interchanging. oh well | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:10 GMT
#2890
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:12 GMT
#2892
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:13 GMT
#2896
And town really needed a vigilante. This game had basically the same setup as Hero Mini Mafia except mafia got more night-shots, there was one less townie, and town didn't have a vigilante. And mafia won that game. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:17 GMT
#2901
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:18 GMT
#2906
On May 30 2013 06:18 Blazinghand wrote: Oh sorry marv, how thoughtless of me: the only good veteran. why are you randomly being a complete prick? just curious | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:20 GMT
#2912
On May 30 2013 06:19 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 30 2013 06:18 marvellosity wrote: On May 30 2013 06:18 Blazinghand wrote: Oh sorry marv, how thoughtless of me: the only good veteran. why are you randomly being a complete prick? just curious I'm just mad that I misplayed and got mislynched ![]() pfft, fine. the problem was no-one was good and no-one carried town when they needed carrying. s0lstice and grush randomly piling on GK at the end of the last day was really frustrating. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:22 GMT
#2916
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:22 GMT
#2918
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:24 GMT
#2920
The hits on Spicy and Stutters were kinda surreal to me :p | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:27 GMT
#2926
"scum KP is fixed at 1" actually mafia vigilante is scum KP, so it quite clearly wasn't fixed at 1. that was an outright lie :x | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:29 GMT
#2929
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:34 GMT
#2938
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:34 GMT
#2939
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:35 GMT
#2941
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:35 GMT
#2943
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:37 GMT
#2945
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:38 GMT
#2948
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 29 2013 21:41 GMT
#2951
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 31 2013 09:15 GMT
#2985
On May 31 2013 09:57 Blazinghand wrote: Not sure if that was Marv's writing originally, I think he's quoting a guide from mafiascum's wiki or maybe a TL Guide. I've definitely heard that passage before. It's from the WIFOM section from the mafiascum wiki. It's actually one of their better pages, because one of the things it stresses is that things people all too readily dismiss stuff as WIFOM that isn't really WIFOM. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 31 2013 09:18 GMT
#2987
On May 31 2013 04:29 Blazinghand wrote: Survivor is an okay role, but I don't think it needs extra powers to be balanced or interesting. Survivor is what we economists call a pro-cyclical role, where if the economy is in recession it contributes to recession, whereas if the economy is in boom it contributes to the boom. Survivor will help whoever is winning, making the game more swingy. Contrast SK, who will help whoever is losing. I like this a lot too. Good thought about that role. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 03 2013 20:55 GMT
#3008
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 03 2013 21:04 GMT
#3012
On June 04 2013 06:01 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On June 04 2013 06:00 WaveofShadow wrote: On June 04 2013 05:57 Blazinghand wrote: Like, for what it's worth I'm genuinely upset that I got mislynched. I like to think of myself as a player who almost always contributes positively to his team winning. And I am aware that most people get mislynched at least sometimes, and that this game I got mislynched in part because I personally chose to sign up for 3 games within a 10 day span, but I still don't like getting mislynched. And if the only lessons I can draw from this game are "don't rely on others to save you", "sign up for 1 game at a time", and "when accused, even if the guy is wrong, focus more on scumhunting to clear yourself" then that's okay. But I still feel bad about getting mislynched. I don't think of myself as a guy who gets mislynched. I think it's time to take a deep breath and set fire to your feelings about being mislynched as they float downriver in a wooden boat. Let it go. I did that a week ago, and coming back, I still feel like I need to learn or teach a lesson from this. You don't improve (or rather, I don't improve) by letting things go. I improve by finding out my mistakes and not repeating them. The long and short of it is this; it was about 48 hours between the time you said you were going to search for mafia and when you actually looked for mafia. You did look pretty townie when you looked for mafia, yes. But you left it too late that there existed a very real possibility (in my mind) that you'd put it off for so long so you could just make one enormous effort to stave off your lynch, and that also you could gauge town reactions. My gut call towards the end of day 2 was that you were town, but my gut's been plenty wrong before, and given the slip + 48hour scumhunting gap, I didn't have the confidence to move the lynch elsewhere. If you say you're going to scumhunt on Sunday evening and you only produce something Tuesday evening despite multiple promise in between, it smells. Even after you argued with DP on Sunday evening, you had Monday to do shit, and you did nothing that day either despite repeatedly promising to. If you're short of time then don't promise shit you can't deliver... | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 03 2013 21:08 GMT
#3014
it was like this empty day as far as you were concerned where you made some posts but they were all excusing prior play or promising future play. When it came to Tuesday evening + (2nd half of day 2) the 'goodwill' (terrible word, but you get the gist) had gone and I couldn't excuse myself not lynching you at that point. Obviously it wasn't great play from me because you were town, but also factor in that i'm not stupid and i'm pretty decent and that's the position that *I* felt you had put me in | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 03 2013 21:15 GMT
#3016
On June 04 2013 06:10 Blazinghand wrote: Yeah I mean there's not really much to say other than that I don't see a that much of a scum motive for waiting 24 hours to dump out a specific group of reads. Obviously giving town less time to evaluate your reads is good for scum if you can pull it off, but if you're 100% set to be lynched it almost doesn't matter when you say what you say unless you're really trying to not get lynched. The 24 hour gap between the scumslip argument with DP and me beginning my stuff should have been filled with me stating I was busy for those 24 hours. That being said, I get the feeling that someone who's 100% on the chopping block stating they're busy for the first half of the day doesn't really earn them much credit, but if it's true, it's better to say it than to not say it, or at least it's better to update the thread on when activity can be expected. I made a post at some point which had about 6 or so of your quotes all saying you were scumhunting imminently, where nothing had come the scum motive is that you're putting off having to contribute, and you're sensing who the thread wants to lynch before making your play i'd have been far less inclined to lynch you if you hadn't kept saying that the cases were coming soon and then they didn't come soon. I know you're not one to bring real life into games, but i'd much rather you said "i can't do x until this time"... which WILL look dodgy, but it will look a lot less dodgy than how what you did came across | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 04 2013 00:31 GMT
#3028
31-11-2 | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 04 2013 00:33 GMT
#3030
i also die quickly a lot | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 04 2013 00:36 GMT
#3032
On June 04 2013 09:35 Blazinghand wrote: Yeah people really like shooting you so I guess your games are often pretty short to be fair it is mainly that i play a metric shit-tonne. i basically play constantly with like 1-2 week breaks in between sometimes. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 04 2013 00:38 GMT
#3033
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 04 2013 01:02 GMT
#3036
On June 04 2013 09:46 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On June 04 2013 09:38 marvellosity wrote: also BH, you haven't won a non-scum game where I wasn't on your team since Aperture ![]() That's just an artefact of most of the time I play with you, we're both town (since town is the most likely alignment) and most of the time I play, I play with you. maybe, but in that time as well, 6 of your losses I was a different alignment to you. i think this is the first game we had the same alignments and we lost :< edit: no! LIII it happened too further edit: by my count you're 5-2 when you're the same alignment and 0-6 as different alignments. COINCIDENCE? I think not! :OOOOO | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 04 2013 09:16 GMT
#3043
On June 04 2013 13:22 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On June 04 2013 13:15 DarthPunk wrote: On June 04 2013 13:07 Blazinghand wrote: I did eventually try to tunnel GK a bit. Not that getting him mislynched before me would have helped much, but I did try. Part of the problem I think is I wanted to get a tunnel started on GK but I was having trouble getting people to engage with me on him. I had to call out people by name, and often more than once, to get them to respond to the case. Your GK push wasn't convincing enough. If your case had blown away the town and you spammed up the thread calling for a lynch you would have lived. Town won't switch off you if they have to think too hard. you need to make it really really easy for everyone to switch wagons. I suspect part of that had to do with the fact that he was town. If he was scum I'd be able to find more info on him. This is what the whole game boiled down to actually. The misread on you wasn't actually disastrous, but the whole GK issue made your push less convincing, and led me to not being sure enough to push JJD on the next day. This whole game was actually the "GK issue". | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 10 2013 11:33 GMT
#3051
On June 08 2013 06:33 goodkarma wrote: 4) Lol that last day consolidation was OP. I absolutely loved how Marv, who most people thought was town, would say let's lynch this guy, and then most of town did the exact opposite thing. This was unfortunate. "let's kill JJD after all" --> 2 other townies come in and vote GK. D'oh! GK, you need to not do the whole role PM thing. I'm never really going to defend someone who doesn't read their role PM and then uses it as part of their defence. | ||
| ||
BSL: ProLeague
Bracket Stage: Day 2
HBO vs Doodle
spx vs Tech
DragOn vs Hawk
Dewalt vs TerrOr
ZZZero.O263
[ Submit Event ] |
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Dota 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • HeavenSC StarCraft: Brood War![]() • Adnapsc2 ![]() • Dystopia_ ![]() ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv ![]() • Migwel ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() Dota 2 Other Games |
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
WardiTV Invitational
WardiTV Invitational
GSL Code S
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] WardiTV Invitational
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Invitational
Cheesadelphia
GSL Code S
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|