EPTHydra Mini Mafia II - Extra Nuke Edition - Page 24
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
InsertSmurfHere
288 Posts
On April 13 2013 16:15 FiveTouch wrote: And I'm gonna go on the record and say I'm a little salty we didn't get more Prom tonight. BOLD STATEMENT | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Kill JohnMatrix. They don't care about finding scum. They only care about lying about nuking townies. See you tomorrow thread. | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Earlier when I called you out for your "contextless questions" I was attributing his play to you. I wanted more out of Prom because his initial flurry of questions were focusless, led nowhere and did nothing. I'm suspicious of him and want him in the thread explaining his shit. That bold enough for you? | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
InsertSmurfHere
288 Posts
On April 13 2013 16:20 FiveTouch wrote: Yam your headphones came unplugged could you turn down the sarcasm? Earlier when I called you out for your "contextless questions" I was attributing his play to you. I wanted more out of Prom because his initial flurry of questions were focusless, led nowhere and did nothing. I'm suspicious of him and want him in the thread explaining his shit. That bold enough for you? It was a joke, bro. I agree, actually. | ||
|
MockArmor
Vatican City State88 Posts
On April 13 2013 16:01 ShotgunBiceps wrote: That's terrrrrrible. Like of all the reasons you could have came up with from the last 10 pages of spam, that's what you come up with? The logic in this post: 1) I have a town-read you don't understand 2) ...BUT that's a "poor reason" to ssuepct me 3) HOWEVER there's the POSSIBILITY that I buddied Wave. 4) Therefore... I'm suspicious? What on earth? I mean what's there even to defend. You called one of your own reasons for finding me suspicious bad, then you say I "buddied" someone. That's a statement, and not analysis. Who's posting here? Is this GK? Calling a dude that buddied you town (with such weak reasoning) is a way to buddy him back in my eyes. I was hoping for some kind of elaboration, like "From all the play I've seen from wave I believe he would be too timid to make a list of names as scum." Or whatever specific meta-reason it may be (like more specific than what you've said...). With hopefully a prior game link or two to show it. Because I'm not privy to this meta-reason that you seem to be. List posts are kinda really easy to make regardless of alignment... I really don't follow how you can have decided the guy was town based off what you've presented here in thread. | ||
|
InsertSmurfHere
288 Posts
| ||
|
ShotgunBiceps
171 Posts
On April 13 2013 16:24 MockArmor wrote: Calling a dude that buddied you town (with such weak reasoning) is a way to buddy him back in my eyes. I was hoping for some kind of elaboration, like "From all the play I've seen from wave I believe he would be too timid to make a list of names as scum." Or whatever specific meta-reason it may be (like more specific than what you've said...). With hopefully a prior game link or two to show it. Because I'm not privy to this meta-reason that you seem to be. List posts are kinda really easy to make regardless of alignment... I really don't follow how you can have decided the guy was town based off what you've presented here in thread. Well I don't think it's weak. I think it shows a light-hearted mentality that's hard to fake as scum, and it's uncannily observant for something that could be a "mafia-joke". Of course that doesn't mean that I'm going to ignore everything he says right now and treat him like auto-town, but I like the mentality behind that post. As for a meta reason, I'd kinda expect a newer scum-player (WoS hasn't played as mafia to my knowledge) to be a lot more uptight and serious. Instead he comes in joking, and that goes at odds with my expectations of his scum-play. As for "buddying," how is that at all a heuristic for catching scum? I talk to newbies about not making reads based on that kinda stuff, and I see you doing it. So who is posting here? GK? | ||
|
ShotgunBiceps
171 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On April 13 2013 08:58 John Matrix wrote: ok I just got modconfirmed town so my work here is done. Syllo will explain why I'm confirmed tomorrow. If he doesn't he's scum. See you, I'm gonna go watch the watchmen again. Because most* hosts are terrible** and only make jokes and interact with players who are town. This literally happens every game. *everyone except you **no offense intended | ||
|
MockArmor
Vatican City State88 Posts
On April 13 2013 16:09 FiveTouch wrote: How about the weak +1 to Yam Suspicion and never following up on it? That doesn't strike you as "scum motivated" in spite of having weak +1 suspicion of me too? Lots of weak +1 posts is no longer a valid scum tell around here? Perhaps I've set the bar a bit low since my last game with DP. I mean, the guy didn't really seem to jump in (in The Game) until VE came at him, and the way he responded really felt like some kind of scum emotional OMGUS response at the time (when he was actually town)... From my experience, town DP does have more balls though, so I would agree that meta-argument supports the theory of a scum DP. But in general: being wishy washy, while scummy, is definitely something town does too. I remember soooo many townies in past games that behaved like that. Hence why I asked about scum motivation, as in what specific scum agenda would he be pushing? They are different, non-interchangable terms to me. | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On April 13 2013 16:29 ShotgunBiceps wrote: Well I don't think it's weak. I think it shows a light-hearted mentality that's hard to fake as scum, and it's uncannily observant for something that could be a "mafia-joke". Of course that doesn't mean that I'm going to ignore everything he says right now and treat him like auto-town, but I like the mentality behind that post. As for a meta reason, I'd kinda expect a newer scum-player (WoS hasn't played as mafia to my knowledge) to be a lot more uptight and serious. Instead he comes in joking, and that goes at odds with my expectations of his scum-play. As for "buddying," how is that at all a heuristic for catching scum? I talk to newbies about not making reads based on that kinda stuff, and I see you doing it. So who is posting here? GK? I didn't go back and check until just now, but this from a much older game (LVII) was what was in my mind.: [B]On September 05 2012 09:52 Hapahauli wrote: The strange thing is that he buddied up to [b]me and not to BC. Hell it's pretty clear from his post that he didn't read the thread, given his stances on Grush and lvdr. Seems you didn't directly implicate it as a scumtell, but you had no problem with it either... But that was a much better explanation. Thank you. | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On April 13 2013 16:25 InsertSmurfHere wrote: No typos, almost certainly not Mocsta. This. | ||
|
MockArmor
Vatican City State88 Posts
 On April 13 2013 16:51 goodkarma wrote: + Show Spoiler + On April 13 2013 16:29 ShotgunBiceps wrote: Well I don't think it's weak. I think it shows a light-hearted mentality that's hard to fake as scum, and it's uncannily observant for something that could be a "mafia-joke". Of course that doesn't mean that I'm going to ignore everything he says right now and treat him like auto-town, but I like the mentality behind that post. As for a meta reason, I'd kinda expect a newer scum-player (WoS hasn't played as mafia to my knowledge) to be a lot more uptight and serious. Instead he comes in joking, and that goes at odds with my expectations of his scum-play. As for "buddying," how is that at all a heuristic for catching scum? I talk to newbies about not making reads based on that kinda stuff, and I see you doing it. So who is posting here? GK? I didn't go back and check until just now, but this from a much older game (LVII) was what was in my mind.: Seems you didn't directly implicate it as a scumtell, but you had no problem with it either... But that was a much better explanation. Thank you. | ||
|
ShotgunBiceps
171 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On April 13 2013 15:32 MockArmor wrote: The disappointing aspect of the game is that we have a bunch of people waiting for better scumhunters to "carry" them. And yet, their lack of participation makes it that much harder to find scum (like half the people in the game, so they can't all be scum...). At the time of this post the game had been going on for less than 8 hours; did you genuinely find the thread worse than usual and their posting indicative of them waiting for others to "carry" them? Can you make a list of players (should be easy since you suggested that there were many) who you thought were doing this? You named one, but that was just a person who prima facie left due to time zone constraints. | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
InsertSmurfHere
288 Posts
| ||
| ||
