you just seem to use a lot of your time on a dumb offhand remark about nothing that everybody knows is about nothing and that consequently also leads to nothing.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 18:10 GMT

#952

like did you expect WoS to claim mafia after you asked him about the claim thing or what exactly were you trying with this entire claim ordeal? including the part where you attack marv for not voting WoS.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 18:10 GMT

#953

i just don't understand any of it. so any clarifying explanation you can give would be greatly appreciated.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 18:34 GMT

#956

On April 08 2013 03:17 Ace wrote:
I didn't vote WoS yet only because I was waiting on him to come in and explain himself after the "where is the claim I can't find it?" post. I don't know if you read my last response with WoS but it's all cleared up on that end. WoS didn't understand what I was asking and I didn't understand what he meant by stating he already claimed.

The marv part was me seeing marv following the same thought process I was and not seeing the potential WoS lie. Unlike WoS who I had a misunderstanding with, marv says WoS didn't claim. If he didn't claim, but he stated he did claim then there is a lie there. Marv somehow missed that. Since marv claims to be a good player I don't see how he could have missed that. Does this make sense now? and yes the shhhh post was me hoping iamp didn't spoil a potential trap

But we've already moved past the claim thing. The issue is resolved.

how did we move past it? aren't we discussing it now or something? can you be past something that you're discussing right now?

you just attacked marv for not voting WoS while he thought that WoS was lying
and at the very moment you are not voting WoS even though you obviously think that WoS was lying
that's just complete bullshit

you knew WoS had not claimed because your entire trap relies on the fact that he had not claimed. also, if you don't want someone to ruin your trap you probably shouldn't quote a post and write "SSHHH ABOUT THAT IT'S A BIG SECRET". it all seems really phony and completely useless.

nobody should be voting WoS anyway for a "lie" like that, that doesn't show in any way that WoS is scum. either he was kidding around or he thought he had claimed (or like it really was, he had claimed but people failed to notice it) but none of those scenarios point at him being scum.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 18:39 GMT

#958

On April 07 2013 05:11 Ace wrote:
I've been busy WoS. I actually don't think you should be lynched at the moment, as I think Oats is a far bigger distraction. Marv is just talking nonsense as always.

WoS since you're at L-2 right now don't hesitate to claim when the next person votes.I'm not gonna hammer you unless that situation resolves itself. For now tho:

##vote: Oatsmaster

what you mean by that? marv wins a lot of his town games and usually has great reads, i think you're the only one in this game who thinks that marv is just talking nonsense, and surely the only one who think that that's what he always does.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 18:59 GMT

#960

On April 08 2013 03:51 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hey Prp,
Asking you about your past

Why did you post this,

Show nested quote +

sleep or something
then

Show nested quote +

and never talk about Axle again?

no one took notice of my initial post on axle and some people actually had town reads on axle so i asked what was up. later, i didn't have a lot of time so i skimmed the biggest case and decided it was alright.

Show nested quote +

You have no scumreads but your vote is on WoS? Am I misunderstanding something?

Also the claim was just from a weird perspective by WoS, drop it please.

Also any reads? Other than WoS who I assume is still your scumread.

Also this(your filter) looks very different from Nomination and Red Team.

keyword is "really", i'm not very confident in anything. yes my vote is on WoS he could be scum. it still is because i didn't even consider removing it, he's not in immediate danger and he could be scum.

can't really comment on the meta thing, guess that's your opinion or whatever. i'm pretty sure i was under a lot of heavy fire d1 in red team for being a lurker too so i can't really relate to what you're saying about how this isn't looking like red team. other people are obviously seeing the same thing in both filters.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 19:06 GMT

#962

about axle i guess i moved on for the while. he's not clear at all but his filter is full of weird chezinuish crap and i just don't feel like deciphering that right now.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 19:19 GMT

#970

On April 08 2013 04:15 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

Can you tell me why you were askign the thread about Axle when you've played and shared a QT with him? I don't get this.

i didn't remember him. can you accept this explanation or do you want me to go into my filter and find another town game where i forgot someone i had hosted a game for? because, as you might suspect by now, i can easily do that but of course it's going to be tedious so i don't want to if you can just wholly accept that explanation.

if i was scum, was it that game of BH's where i was scum and i was lynched on d1 for only writing 4 posts? because that should make it even more believable that i wasn't paying much attention.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 19:23 GMT

#972

On April 08 2013 04:16 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

I also want this to help me decide.

But whatever.

When in doubt go with my original gut read.

##vote sciberbia

don't you know that you're almost always wrong on your initial d1 read?

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 19:42 GMT

#975

i'm here

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 20:22 GMT

#1007

i also don't like how ace just dismissed my pokes with "we've moved on" and then disappeared.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 20:25 GMT

#1008

i can't believe #yolo caught on but not #ghostbusters

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 22:54 GMT

#1102

official votecount?

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 22:59 GMT

#1106

unofficial votecount:

dp, scib, iamp on axle
marv, wos, oats, palm on ace

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 23:02 GMT

#1110

@ace what exactly are you trying to do with now and how are you trying to accomplish it?

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 23:02 GMT

#1111

not "with now" but "right now"

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 23:43 GMT

#1145

okay i simply cannot believe ace's "scum lie because they know townies don't read the thread"-thing. it's rather hilarious considering that everybody in this thread caught the supposed "lie", some (hello) even knew what the hell WoS was talking about (the town claim in the beginning).

he seriously thinks that, when it comes to a claim, WoS is banking on not a single one of the many town players in this game will gloss over his filter and fact check it. i just cannot wrap my head around that line of thought.

a lie in itself doesn't mean anything though, ace never explains why on earth scum would lie about this. "because he knows they will not catch him" is simply not a reason to lie. technically, all fits. ace could have seen it as a lie and then he could lynch him because townies don't lie. but that's the laziest excuse i have seen in as long as i can remember and ace isn't even recanting or anything, he's dead serious about it.

i simply don't get it.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

April 07 2013 23:44 GMT

#1147

On April 08 2013 08:38 Palmar wrote:
to clarify, by good I mean less bad than he used to.

and since I have no clue who is scum whatever.

I just want to lynch someone and I don't want it to be axle.

Sciberbia, Ace, prplhz, reyn, WoS, marv are all fine by me.

why not axle?

you said earlier that you had no idea about his chezinuish posting and someone else would have to figure him out, but ever since you've been town on him?