EPTgotcha
RED Team's Prize - Page 7
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
gotcha | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
yo ho ho a pirate ye be. at night you can target someone but you're so drunk it will fail. you may choose to walk the plank, be keelhauled or marooned. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On April 01 2013 07:37 strongandbig wrote: Okay two things First, prplhz if your role works as claimed then how were you "unsure" whether you killed palmar? After the flip you should have known that your power would've delivered a bullet to the head not a gun. At that point, I'm pretty sure the logical thing to say is not "maybe I killed him". Second, I don't buy the explanation for choosing palmar. You're saying you chose someone who you had no read on, just to see what would happen? And that to do this you chose palmar? That makes much less sense to me than the alternative, scum explanation. Third, if we hypothesize that marv's and my roles were phrased the way they are because of the interaction with prplhz's role, what seems more likely - that it was done to make a town prplhz more powerful or to make a scum prplhz less powerful? Okay that was three things I guess. i don't know what would have happened if i had not targetted palmar. still don't. palmar seemed to be town but then he seemed to get more uninterested in the game. i thought a gun would give him more interest in the game and give me a better idea about him. if he's town and he has a gun, good. if he's scum then i give him another gun the next night and he shoots his own brains out, good. i never thought that he'd just die right there. in hindsight i probably shouldn't have done that but i never considered that everybody was blue. i knew i was blue, grack was blue, kei and cora both blue, how many blues could there be? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On April 01 2013 07:50 strongandbig wrote: Okay wait idea brain If we assume that five scum in this setup is unlikely, then that means oats and prp are likely to not be scum together. So we can test both their role claims at the same time by having prp target oats. If prp is lying and oats is telling the truth, oats won't get the gun.get the gun. If oats is lying and prp is telling the truth, then oats will die. If both are telling the truth, then we have oats with a gun and we can tell him who to shoot with it. what did oats claim | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On April 01 2013 08:16 raynpelikoneet wrote: No it's not. This way we have no way of knowing if prplhz's claim is legit. Had he gunned sinani he could have proved his claim on N3 by regunning sinani -> kill him. Smurf hangs anyways today. yes it is. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
anyway it sucked when i saw palmar flip blue because maybe i did that and killing one of the best townies on n1 isn't really what i was hoping to do this game so when the opportunity to play it safe came up, i did just that. giving the gun to someone who is 100% getting lynched tomorrow is the best idea unless: 1) i'm really sure he's vanilla scum AND there's someone i am really sure is vanilla townie and is going to make it to tomorrow OR there's someone i am really sure is blue scum 2) i'm really sure he's vanilla townie AND there's someone i am really sure is vanilla townie and is going to make it to tomorrow OR there's someone i am really sure is blue scum so playing it safe is giving it to smurf. also, in response to marv "suboptimal" and rayn "really bad", what would you have done n1? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
| ||
