EPTOn March 27 2013 10:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
No, we go after you or Rainbows.
No, we go after you or Rainbows.
By that logic if I had gotten lynched and flipped green, you'd be guilty then?
Newbie Mafia XXXIX - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
By that logic if I had gotten lynched and flipped green, you'd be guilty then? | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On March 27 2013 10:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: No, because i'm town after all. And i don't think you're gonna flip town. I would hate to build up the excitement for three days just for you to be wrong but.... man are you going to be disapointed. Fitting it will happen on my birthday. I will consder your tears of sadness about being wrong my gift. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On March 27 2013 10:45 nobodywonder wrote: My goodbye post: welp That is an anticlimatic goodbye post. I had a good idea for mine. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On March 27 2013 11:13 JarJarDrinks wrote: So me or ray get hit tonight obv. Maybe they go after Virtu instead but I think they leave him alone since he seems to have gone inactive. If there's a townie among Rainbows/Raven/Krafla then they surely aren't gonna go after him since the lynch is gonna come from this group. So in short: any roleblocker should choose from Rainbows/Raven/Krafla. Any Healer should choose from Me/Ray/Virtu. Well given how high the association case between me and Rainbows is, I doubt either of us are getting shot. I really dislike you think we should waste a healer on freaken Virtu. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On March 27 2013 21:00 JarJarDrinks wrote: Who's that? I would gyess me and rainbows sense we pushed the lynch. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On March 28 2013 04:31 JarJarDrinks wrote: Because if we stop an attack w/ a heal or roleblock. We can still win a tie tomorrow if we vote fast enough. I know that seems unlikely w/ Virtu as one of the townies, but that would be a reason the game could still be going on w/ 3 mafia. The op very specifically says the mafia instant win if they tie the number of townies. So it wouldn't matter if we have a medic that could save. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On March 28 2013 06:15 TheRavensName wrote: The op very specifically says the mafia instant win if they tie the number of townies. So it wouldn't matter if we have a medic that could save. Alright I was wrong. But I think if its 3 mafia its considered inevitable because they could all instant vote the same person and then we lose for not being able to disenseminate who is the mafia as fast as they can figure out who isn't. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On March 28 2013 10:03 JarJarDrinks wrote: ##Vote: TheRavensName Give me a case or something man... I need SOMETHING to work with. On March 23 2013 05:30 JarJarDrinks wrote: I feel like the reason for that should be obvious. Scum doesn't want to be responsible for lynching a townie but he still wants a townie lynched So basically he points out that I'm suspicious and hostile hoping to maybe influence some people and get me lynched. Then when I turn up green, he doesn't look suspicious because he "defended" me and can go after one of the people that voted for me. I would think that the best result for mafia is getting a townie lynched with the least amount of scum voting for that person. And notice that he still left himself an out so he could go back to voting for me if the situation required it. He said he sees "no reason to punish it till after other people show up." The new bolded parts seem to point as much to Jarjar's voting style as it does mine. He changed around quite a bit as soon as a new person was chosen to be lynched. For example he went off me and onto frorgon as soon as I was declared the lynch, and on day two he went off NW when he was unavoidably lynched and moved to each of the other vote targets that didn't have any votes on them, which is a great strategy because it would still have gotten NW or me lynched without him having to commit to the final death. On March 24 2013 10:04 cDgCorazon wrote: Night 1 Final Vote Count Frorgon: (2) JarJarDrinks, TheRavensName Krafla (2): Krafla, Raynpelikoneet TheRavensName (1): Frorgon, Virtu (1): Rainbows, Rainbows (1): Fishgle JarJarDrinks (0): Raynpelikoneet (0): Not Voting: (2) Virtu, Nobodywonder On March 27 2013 10:00 cDgCorazon wrote: [Center]Night 2 Final Vote Count: Nobodywonder (3): TheRavensName, Rainbows, Krafla TheRavensName (3): Raynpelikoneet, NobodyWonder, JarJarDrinks, Krafla (1): Virtu (0): Not Voting (1): Virtu Nobodywonder wins the tiebreaker due to getting 3 votes first [G]If everyones required to vote, why has Virtu been allowed to live for TWO DAYS without a modkill or replacement? [/g]Serriously it makes it so unfair to figure out who is who cause it seems like hes being allowed to live either to prevent a mafia instant win or to prevent there only being one mafia player and we have nothing to analyze off him to figure out which is which I think we have two possibilities... Either the scum is Virtu and Rainbows, in which case brilliantly done Rainbows for managing to win basically alone at this rate, or Jarjar is one of the scum... and I still don't know if hes working with Rainbows or Virtu... I don't think its Ray because hes been focusing on me for so long and none of the night kills really paint against me the way they should be and most of them are people that didn't like me anyways. This is my little case against Jarjar, I will refrain from voting until I look at everyone elses filter. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
I'm having a hard time choosing between Ray and Rainbows. Rainbows has spent so much time defending me and would have easily been able to jump me and get me lynched without being suspicious at all... but then again this is so WIFOM, because he played with me last game and knew my whole logic for not killing off Omni when he got very suspicious for a lot of people was that he had been sticking by me when he could have tossed me under and got me killed no problem. I also can't get over how he thought Virtu was the best lynch possible to being whatever just some lurking guy.+ Show Spoiler + On March 23 2013 00:53 Rainbows wrote: Holy crap you're scum. ##Unvote ##Vote: Virtu On March 23 2013 22:18 Rainbows wrote: Virtu best lynch USA This is virtu's first real post. I ask myself: what is he trying to accomplish here? Instead of commenting on the happenings in the thread, it is simply speaking in generalities. Town should be doing this, we should be generating discussion this way. Guys, obviously I'm pro-town if I'm suggesting we do these pro-town things but not actually do them. How does this post further towns agenda of finding scum? It doesn't. It's a pretty generic post that serves no real purpose on than for people to go "Ahh! Yes! This fine TLer right here, he is advocating pro-town things!" Here's the post that really caught my attention: At this point in time, I had just made a post on Ray and voted him. Virtu steps in a page later and simply casts his 'suspicion' upon him. Why is this post scummy? Because virtu is not attempting to find scum on his own. . . he is content at using my post on Ray in order to justify his 'read'. Town want to search all possible avenues, but apparently the only thing that has caught his attention is something I earlier put in bold. There was plenty of other things scummy in the thread at the time that nobody mentioned (see: frogron question). Why is virtu not trying to find scum himself? And he hasn't all game long. I won't comment on the Godfather incident. What the hell is this post trying to say? So we should not go after lurkers (easy target) but we should definitely notice they aren't doing shit! So yeah guys, be suspect of lurkers right now. Pretty paramount that we notice those lurkers aren't posting, because, you know, that gets us places. virtu's defence Basically flails his arms at me and calls me stupid, which made me giggle on the inside. Firstly, the comparison between his post and AD's post is concrete, dispute that all you want. Was a scummy post yo. In reference to the bolded, wtf? So you should post to agree / disagree and act all scummy as hell? IF THIS IS YOUR PHILOSOPHY ON PLAYING TOWN, PLEASE LEAVE SIR. virtu refuses to find scum on his own. AT ALL! I also thought his response to the Fishgle post was interesting. But that's for another day. Synopsis: - virtu posts paragraphs that do nothing to further towns agenda. - virtu doesn't hunt scum all game, and refuses to. - virtu openly sheeps with zero original thinking, but we should be suspect of lurkers. virtu best lynch right now, gonna be flippin' scum all over this bitch. On March 27 2013 02:46 Rainbows wrote: If virtu doesnt post or just pulls a krafla i will vote him in seconds. I'll be more than happy to take full credit for lynching that dude. Why have you never voted Virtu Rainbows? Why? Hes been your scum read the entire game and you could have went after him day 2... there were TWO votes on him, and you would have put him with NW and Me. He has also been connected to each of the Nightkills by saying they would be kinda eh lynches but were still stupid the day before, (He bashed Fringle, and krafia but said they would be kinda yick lynches.) I need a response on this case ASAP Rainbows, as well as Feedback on both the lynch yesterday and the night kill. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
Sleepy time now Point of this vote: Hope whoever checks this first votes for him and isn't one of the mafia. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
##Vote: Rainbows | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On March 28 2013 21:45 raynpelikoneet wrote: EBWOP: Above question is to everyone else too. I can't be much online today. I might make a post late tonight if i have enough time to reread all filters and actually think about stuff. I really didn't think Krafla would die, that threw me a bit off. What about you Ray? What do you see? and TBH, Krafia makes the most sense. He was brushed off as a stupid townie, the only person more then one has confirmed town. Virtu has been lurking the longest out of everyone so hes a waste of a kill because hes such a mystery, Jarjar and you have been gunning for me for a while so killing me is a poor choice, and Rainbows is just as suspicious so killing him makes no sense either.TBH now that Virtu is back I'm tempted to switch my vote to him. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On March 28 2013 22:46 JarJarDrinks wrote: This statement only makes sense coming from someone that knows that Ray and I are both town. Doesn't matter if you are both town, only one of you is, or if Rainbows and Virtu are the towns. Killing me makes it so you two will vote elsewhere, possibly on the scum if it is not you two. TBH out of everyone left, I think Ray is least likely to be scum. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On March 28 2013 22:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: Raven: I see you calling everyone but virtu scum without no reasoning. Please explain this without the double negative that is aggrivating my head. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
I explained my reasoning. I think rainbows is right about this confirmation bias you got going. | ||
| ||
