|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Anyway.
Interesting that earlier today I said I was making a specific effort to talk about ppl not called Foolish and Vivax, and having successfully done so, Vivax comes in with this steaming pile of shit now.
On March 13 2013 04:48 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 04:42 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 04:38 Vivax wrote:On March 13 2013 04:33 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 04:32 Vivax wrote:On March 13 2013 04:25 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 04:12 Vivax wrote:
Look at what marv said, he seems to have been forced by the hosts to say that he's a parity cop and not just a cop so apparently he initially lied about his role O_o I have to announce my role and my targets. I was hoping to be fancy with it and be vague enough that mafia don't know exactly what I'm doing. Hence why I claimed cop, then claimed two targets, and said "and stuff" in a vague manner. Apparently my 2nd post might not even be acceptable either because I didn't put my targets with the exact reference parity cop, but I'm hoping I'll be allowed to get away with that one. And why did you think it would be better for you to claim cop over parity cop? How did you think would it be better if scum though this? why don't you stop asking really stupid questions? It's in your interest to answer me before I leave. You are confirmed liar (: . Nice that you call Foolishness scum over a lie that is arguably not as bad as yours. For some reason you wanted to appear as cop over parity cop which would appear more dangerous for scum, so it doesn't make sense for you to lie about it this way if you're town. Scummarv claims cop → I can claim to have gotten any check back I wanted. Scummarv claims parity cop → My checks are limited and if one guy is of one alignment the other must be of the opposite Townmarv claims cop → I look more dangerous for scum and am at risk of getting RBd/killed. Also I won't actually know if someone is really scum after N1 even though I claimed I would. Townmarv claims parity cop → Honest answer, town will know what it has to expect. Summary: Townmarv wouldn't lie about being a cop over a parity cop. If you are somehow town, you are by far the worst player I have ever played with in all my games of mafia. By far. You are so atrocious it's unbelievable. How is saying parity cop over cop (hello, both cops) worse than using a lie to call someone mafia? what drugs are you smoking? what was my motivation for doing that as mafia? why am i doing it as town? maybe to try to be vague so mafia don't know EXACTLY what I'm doing? what the fuck is wrong with you? why are you questioning me on the specifics of my blue role at night? WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU DO THAT? If you're town, you actually need psychiatric help because you're fucking insane. Oh we're back to this Foolish didn't lie to call you mafia he allegedly lied to say he's not sure about you. Marvybaby so mad  , ragequit like in LVIII please instead of spamming your one-liners 
Ragequit like that last game I was town because you know I'm town this game? Right Vivax?
[/backtoavoidingVivax]
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 04:49 prplhz wrote:I think that BloodyC0bbler is scum. filterBloodyC0bbler starts out by jokingly pushing Ver and slOosh though it turns out that he is being very serious about this. This is similar to his opening post from Storm Mafia where he was scum. Nothing in PTP3, LVIII, Liquid City, LVI, L, all town games and in all games he got down to business. His push on Ver is purely based on how Ver is not around and while BloodyC0bbler drops slOosh he keeps his Ver scum read right up until now. He has been told that Ver said before the game that he wouldn't have time before Monday but this doesn't stop BloodyC0bbler, even though BloodyC0bbler was lynched by a rampant town in his last game when he was in a similar situation to Ver's, having warned the thread about his projected activity but still getting lynched for it. Another really curious thing about the Ver push is this post. It makes no sense at all, because they are experienced they should have written an apology? But an apology (or the lack thereof) has no bearing on alignment at all, it is not hard to write an apology, it just seems too convinient for BloodyC0bbler to use this bad logic to legitimize his push. This Ver push just seems very unlike BloodyC0bbler from his town games. While he does have early reads such as in PTP3 where he had an early Kurumi scum read, he interacts with the thread and he constantly evolves his reads. In a town game where he says in his fourth post that Kurumi is obviously scum, he still has a lot of other opinions and ends up voting differently. He's constantly reevaluating but there's nothing of that in this game. How BloodyC0bbler is acting on D1 in general is curious. BloodyC0bbler is a guy who has a certain opinion of himself. Look at this post where he says that no one can say that he has bad D1 reads because of the list he made. Look at this post where he claims to be one of the most experienced players with the ability to lead. This is in a game with Foolishness, sandroba, Palmar and many other really good players but he still thinks he's the best choice for mayor. He has high thought of himself but he doesn't show that at all in this game, he's actually just sitting back and hoping that Ver will lynch himself. About this very light pushing of Ver, even though he doesn't want to lynch wherebugsgo his activity becomes horrible up until the lynch. The last and biggest thing he does related to the lynch is this post: Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 10:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 12 2013 10:02 strongandbig wrote:
I'm with you on wbg, bc
Why is Yamato so important to kill?
I kinda get Ver since he's a well known "good player", although I'm not sure why the timing of a policy lynch matters, but with Yamato it's not like he's on that level and he's under enough pressure that there's no risk of him slipping out of the spotlight. Its not so much policy as meta. But again people can take it as they want. He has meshed up fully with his mafia meta from my experience and I know what hes capable of. Yamato is important because he has played so obviously anti town. As annoying as Kurumi was being he was not actively doing anything others already weren't. Instead he shot him. He shot someone who was likely just a townie roleplaying instead of some mafia trolling. "Its not so much policy as meta", does BloodyC0bbler even know himself why he is lynching Ver? And notice why he wants to lynch yamato77, it's not because he is scum but because he has played "obviously anti town". This is true but that's absolutely no reason to lynch him, this is no reason in itself to think that he is scum. Even when I ask him what he meant with his decafchicken comment he doesn't use that in any way to influence the lynch. There's no "decafchicken was lynched because of dumb coincidence and we shouldn't repeat that here, lets lynch Ver because I have played 50 games with him and my D1 reads are awesome", he's just answering my dumb and largely irrelevant question. Anyway, I really think that BloodyC0bbler is scum. How you guys feel about it?
yes. you could well be right. At least i haven't got good reasons to call him town, and normally a town-BC has given me those reasons by now.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Vivax, a parity cop is a cop. And I said why I claimed as I did, as usual you just haven't read the thread.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
A parity cop where I get both my checks in one night (unlike a usual parity cop who gets one a night) is far more dangerous than a normal cop, because theoretically I get 2 alignments (assuming I'm clever enough to work out which is which if they're opposite).
Again, the fact you're asking a blue to clarify exactly how his role works at night is one of the most exceptionally dull things I've ever seen in a game of mafia.
Whether I'm claiming parity cop or cop, I am a target for mafia. Do you think if I claimed parity cop immediately, mafia think "oh, na, that's not dangerous at all! we'll leave him!"? No.
Scummarv claims parity cop → My checks are limited and if one guy is of one alignment the other must be of the opposite - one player doesn't have to be the opposite.
Your entire premise of everything makes no sense.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 06:20 austinmcc wrote:
marv, I don't care if your role involves having to claim things, it's a bad idea to spell it out more than you need to in the thread.
yes, i know, i know. the only thing worse than Vivax questioning a blue about his role at night is the guy being stupid enough to answer.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 06:28 Acrofales wrote:
Marv, if you're a parity cop who had to claim the targets beforehand, then it is a completely useless role if you even think there might be a small chance of scum having a framer.
I'm well aware of this. But what's a boy to do?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 06:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 06:46 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 13 2013 06:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Also the case on me by prpl makes me laugh. Try harder mr try hard.
Austin also super baddy. Why would bc change his posting style in a game with altered personalities. Likely because hes playing his personality. Themed games dont equal normal. Nor does the fact I have less time now to actively play.
However good try captain try hard 2. -.- Don't poke people for trying BC. Its prpl and austin. Both are experienced enough to know better. Also, marv has outright lied about how he garners reads on me. As he was unsure of my alignment in LX and was basing my alignment on if I got shot n1 or not. Given his tried and true method is not neccesarily in play this game given that there are so many big names to shoot him outright saying I have a tell for him d1 is an outright lie. Now the only reason I mention it is he made a huge deal of foolishness lying yet does it himself. Hypocritical actions make BC sad.
... you were smurfing and for almost the whole first day you spoke in Vayesh speak. Are you really equating how you play as Vayesh, when you speak in 3rd person and speak in riddles, with how you play under this username? Seriously?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 07:13 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 06:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 13 2013 06:46 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 13 2013 06:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Also the case on me by prpl makes me laugh. Try harder mr try hard.
Austin also super baddy. Why would bc change his posting style in a game with altered personalities. Likely because hes playing his personality. Themed games dont equal normal. Nor does the fact I have less time now to actively play.
However good try captain try hard 2. -.- Don't poke people for trying BC. Its prpl and austin. Both are experienced enough to know better. Also, marv has outright lied about how he garners reads on me. As he was unsure of my alignment in LX and was basing my alignment on if I got shot n1 or not. Given his tried and true method is not neccesarily in play this game given that there are so many big names to shoot him outright saying I have a tell for him d1 is an outright lie. Now the only reason I mention it is he made a huge deal of foolishness lying yet does it himself. Hypocritical actions make BC sad. ... you were smurfing and for almost the whole first day you spoke in Vayesh speak. Are you really equating how you play as Vayesh, when you speak in 3rd person and speak in riddles, with how you play under this username? Seriously?
Like, I seriously cannot believe in any way you're equating your play when you play like this:
On February 26 2013 09:49 VayeshMoru wrote:
It was a dark day for the settlers. With the children of atom back Vayesh knew work had to be done. He began to sift through the remains of his fallen friends. Sadly after a quick glance of both bodies it was clear no new information could be garnered. It was then that Vayesh knew it was time for the detailed job.
Hours seemed to pass as he poured through the historical documents on the children of atom. It was well known they had a lust for genocide but they seemed to have some other goal in mind as well. All of the relevant information seemed to have been purged however. Only the generic rise and fall of the cult in the past was recorded.
Vayesh thought all hope was lost then realized that the answer may actually be held by the machines left behind to deal with the threat. Gazing at the automatons a plan began to appear.
Vayesh marched his way to the center of the throng, pushing his way to the center of the commotion.
People were fretting over who should replace gmarshal as mayor. It seemed fitting that the men who killed him would clamor to the front hoping to gain some edge of power to use against Vayesh and his friends. So far none of the men who had come to plea their case were trustworthy. Vayesh had seen all he needed to be disgusted.
This town needed order, this town needed guidence, this town needed chezinu
to how you play as BloodyC0bbler. Really this blows my mind.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 07:17 HiroPro wrote:
i dont like prplz case. from what i have seen bc spends a lot of time looking to punish bad play or things he doesnt like even if they arent about finding mafia. look at lviii where he says to kill palmar even thoufh clearly town and then later in obs qt says he did it just cause he thought palmars play was antitown. if bc just keeps spending his time saying same things over and over about yamato then kill him but otherwise look at his other stuff i say.
bc tell us about people other than yamto and ver. i already know what you say about them. you are familar with supersoft? what do you think of him.
where did he say this? i was involved in this game and in that QT and as far as I remember his argument was that Palmar was playing anti-town *and was therefore mafia*. He says this both in-game and in the QT
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
like, he literally fakeclaimed a DT to call Palmar mafia in LVIII. how you can say this was just about punishing bad play i dunno.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 07:22 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 07:13 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 06:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 13 2013 06:46 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 13 2013 06:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Also the case on me by prpl makes me laugh. Try harder mr try hard.
Austin also super baddy. Why would bc change his posting style in a game with altered personalities. Likely because hes playing his personality. Themed games dont equal normal. Nor does the fact I have less time now to actively play.
However good try captain try hard 2. -.- Don't poke people for trying BC. Its prpl and austin. Both are experienced enough to know better. Also, marv has outright lied about how he garners reads on me. As he was unsure of my alignment in LX and was basing my alignment on if I got shot n1 or not. Given his tried and true method is not neccesarily in play this game given that there are so many big names to shoot him outright saying I have a tell for him d1 is an outright lie. Now the only reason I mention it is he made a huge deal of foolishness lying yet does it himself. Hypocritical actions make BC sad. ... you were smurfing and for almost the whole first day you spoke in Vayesh speak. Are you really equating how you play as Vayesh, when you speak in 3rd person and speak in riddles, with how you play under this username? Seriously? and the person I am roleplaying as makes total sense to do what I am doing.
That's your contention, sure, but as far as I can see you're just pushing people who don't post.
Don't say it's an "outright lie" that I'm able to find you town Day 1 and then make a comparison to a game I wasn't even playing where you were trolling under a smurf. That's just ridiculous.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 07:28 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 07:24 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 07:22 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 13 2013 07:13 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 06:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 13 2013 06:46 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 13 2013 06:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Also the case on me by prpl makes me laugh. Try harder mr try hard.
Austin also super baddy. Why would bc change his posting style in a game with altered personalities. Likely because hes playing his personality. Themed games dont equal normal. Nor does the fact I have less time now to actively play.
However good try captain try hard 2. -.- Don't poke people for trying BC. Its prpl and austin. Both are experienced enough to know better. Also, marv has outright lied about how he garners reads on me. As he was unsure of my alignment in LX and was basing my alignment on if I got shot n1 or not. Given his tried and true method is not neccesarily in play this game given that there are so many big names to shoot him outright saying I have a tell for him d1 is an outright lie. Now the only reason I mention it is he made a huge deal of foolishness lying yet does it himself. Hypocritical actions make BC sad. ... you were smurfing and for almost the whole first day you spoke in Vayesh speak. Are you really equating how you play as Vayesh, when you speak in 3rd person and speak in riddles, with how you play under this username? Seriously? and the person I am roleplaying as makes total sense to do what I am doing. That's your contention, sure, but as far as I can see you're just pushing people who don't post. Don't say it's an "outright lie" that I'm able to find you town Day 1 and then make a comparison to a game I wasn't even playing where you were trolling under a smurf. That's just ridiculous. disagree. Even as trolling as a smurf I still pushed my own reads and when I had to broke my roleplay. Posting style can change, major pattern didnt. I don't need to make stupidly large posts to state my opinions. People may listen to them more then but if I don't feel like posting large blocks of texts or yelling at people for 20 pages i'm not going to. I have not done anything this game that would make it hard to determine my alignment if you were able to actually pin me 100% day 1.
you expect me, as purely an observer, to make a massive effort to determine what your posts are pushing when you're trolling, as opposed to when I'm actually in a game and you're not trolling? How can you not see how absurd this is?
Where did I say I could pin you 100% Day 1? I never said that, why are you even saying I did? Why are people constantly misrepresenting what I say this game?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
you did also repeatedly call him mafia and fakeclaim DT to call him mafia, BC.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 07:35 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 05:25 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 04:49 prplhz wrote:I think that BloodyC0bbler is scum. filterBloodyC0bbler starts out by jokingly pushing Ver and slOosh though it turns out that he is being very serious about this. This is similar to his opening post from Storm Mafia where he was scum. Nothing in PTP3, LVIII, Liquid City, LVI, L, all town games and in all games he got down to business. His push on Ver is purely based on how Ver is not around and while BloodyC0bbler drops slOosh he keeps his Ver scum read right up until now. He has been told that Ver said before the game that he wouldn't have time before Monday but this doesn't stop BloodyC0bbler, even though BloodyC0bbler was lynched by a rampant town in his last game when he was in a similar situation to Ver's, having warned the thread about his projected activity but still getting lynched for it. Another really curious thing about the Ver push is this post. It makes no sense at all, because they are experienced they should have written an apology? But an apology (or the lack thereof) has no bearing on alignment at all, it is not hard to write an apology, it just seems too convinient for BloodyC0bbler to use this bad logic to legitimize his push. This Ver push just seems very unlike BloodyC0bbler from his town games. While he does have early reads such as in PTP3 where he had an early Kurumi scum read, he interacts with the thread and he constantly evolves his reads. In a town game where he says in his fourth post that Kurumi is obviously scum, he still has a lot of other opinions and ends up voting differently. He's constantly reevaluating but there's nothing of that in this game. How BloodyC0bbler is acting on D1 in general is curious. BloodyC0bbler is a guy who has a certain opinion of himself. Look at this post where he says that no one can say that he has bad D1 reads because of the list he made. Look at this post where he claims to be one of the most experienced players with the ability to lead. This is in a game with Foolishness, sandroba, Palmar and many other really good players but he still thinks he's the best choice for mayor. He has high thought of himself but he doesn't show that at all in this game, he's actually just sitting back and hoping that Ver will lynch himself. About this very light pushing of Ver, even though he doesn't want to lynch wherebugsgo his activity becomes horrible up until the lynch. The last and biggest thing he does related to the lynch is this post: On March 12 2013 10:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 12 2013 10:02 strongandbig wrote:
I'm with you on wbg, bc
Why is Yamato so important to kill?
I kinda get Ver since he's a well known "good player", although I'm not sure why the timing of a policy lynch matters, but with Yamato it's not like he's on that level and he's under enough pressure that there's no risk of him slipping out of the spotlight. Its not so much policy as meta. But again people can take it as they want. He has meshed up fully with his mafia meta from my experience and I know what hes capable of. Yamato is important because he has played so obviously anti town. As annoying as Kurumi was being he was not actively doing anything others already weren't. Instead he shot him. He shot someone who was likely just a townie roleplaying instead of some mafia trolling. "Its not so much policy as meta", does BloodyC0bbler even know himself why he is lynching Ver? And notice why he wants to lynch yamato77, it's not because he is scum but because he has played "obviously anti town". This is true but that's absolutely no reason to lynch him, this is no reason in itself to think that he is scum. Even when I ask him what he meant with his decafchicken comment he doesn't use that in any way to influence the lynch. There's no "decafchicken was lynched because of dumb coincidence and we shouldn't repeat that here, lets lynch Ver because I have played 50 games with him and my D1 reads are awesome", he's just answering my dumb and largely irrelevant question. Anyway, I really think that BloodyC0bbler is scum. How you guys feel about it? yes. you could well be right. At least i haven't got good reasons to call him town, and normally a town-BC has given me those reasons by now. I think this is the post he's referring to. It doesn't read like "LOL BC so easy to read" to me...more like "Usually as town BC will have given me reasons to think he's town, and this game there's nothing like that"
Right, and this is bleedingly obvious to anyone with half a brain, and BC certainly has that.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 07:39 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 05:25 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 04:49 prplhz wrote:I think that BloodyC0bbler is scum. filterBloodyC0bbler starts out by jokingly pushing Ver and slOosh though it turns out that he is being very serious about this. This is similar to his opening post from Storm Mafia where he was scum. Nothing in PTP3, LVIII, Liquid City, LVI, L, all town games and in all games he got down to business. His push on Ver is purely based on how Ver is not around and while BloodyC0bbler drops slOosh he keeps his Ver scum read right up until now. He has been told that Ver said before the game that he wouldn't have time before Monday but this doesn't stop BloodyC0bbler, even though BloodyC0bbler was lynched by a rampant town in his last game when he was in a similar situation to Ver's, having warned the thread about his projected activity but still getting lynched for it. Another really curious thing about the Ver push is this post. It makes no sense at all, because they are experienced they should have written an apology? But an apology (or the lack thereof) has no bearing on alignment at all, it is not hard to write an apology, it just seems too convinient for BloodyC0bbler to use this bad logic to legitimize his push. This Ver push just seems very unlike BloodyC0bbler from his town games. While he does have early reads such as in PTP3 where he had an early Kurumi scum read, he interacts with the thread and he constantly evolves his reads. In a town game where he says in his fourth post that Kurumi is obviously scum, he still has a lot of other opinions and ends up voting differently. He's constantly reevaluating but there's nothing of that in this game. How BloodyC0bbler is acting on D1 in general is curious. BloodyC0bbler is a guy who has a certain opinion of himself. Look at this post where he says that no one can say that he has bad D1 reads because of the list he made. Look at this post where he claims to be one of the most experienced players with the ability to lead. This is in a game with Foolishness, sandroba, Palmar and many other really good players but he still thinks he's the best choice for mayor. He has high thought of himself but he doesn't show that at all in this game, he's actually just sitting back and hoping that Ver will lynch himself. About this very light pushing of Ver, even though he doesn't want to lynch wherebugsgo his activity becomes horrible up until the lynch. The last and biggest thing he does related to the lynch is this post: On March 12 2013 10:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 12 2013 10:02 strongandbig wrote:
I'm with you on wbg, bc
Why is Yamato so important to kill?
I kinda get Ver since he's a well known "good player", although I'm not sure why the timing of a policy lynch matters, but with Yamato it's not like he's on that level and he's under enough pressure that there's no risk of him slipping out of the spotlight. Its not so much policy as meta. But again people can take it as they want. He has meshed up fully with his mafia meta from my experience and I know what hes capable of. Yamato is important because he has played so obviously anti town. As annoying as Kurumi was being he was not actively doing anything others already weren't. Instead he shot him. He shot someone who was likely just a townie roleplaying instead of some mafia trolling. "Its not so much policy as meta", does BloodyC0bbler even know himself why he is lynching Ver? And notice why he wants to lynch yamato77, it's not because he is scum but because he has played "obviously anti town". This is true but that's absolutely no reason to lynch him, this is no reason in itself to think that he is scum. Even when I ask him what he meant with his decafchicken comment he doesn't use that in any way to influence the lynch. There's no "decafchicken was lynched because of dumb coincidence and we shouldn't repeat that here, lets lynch Ver because I have played 50 games with him and my D1 reads are awesome", he's just answering my dumb and largely irrelevant question. Anyway, I really think that BloodyC0bbler is scum. How you guys feel about it? yes. you could well be right. At least i haven't got good reasons to call him town, and normally a town-BC has given me those reasons by now. thats the post by the way. Do you say 100% no. But the connotation that goes with it does suggest it.
no, it suggests exactly how VE said it and exactly how it's written. That you've given me reasons to think you're town. Like, it literally says those very words and that is exactly how it was meant. Why is this hard to grasp?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 07:41 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 07:35 marvellosity wrote:
you did also repeatedly call him mafia and fakeclaim DT to call him mafia, BC. Yes, but I was also lynched day 1 no? Pretty sure I'm allowed to attempt risky gambles like that given i was attempting to save town from being retarded.
yes, but it also suggests that you were quite convinced Palmar was mafia. Anyway it's not that relevant so never mind.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 07:42 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 06:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 13 2013 06:46 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 13 2013 06:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Also the case on me by prpl makes me laugh. Try harder mr try hard.
Austin also super baddy. Why would bc change his posting style in a game with altered personalities. Likely because hes playing his personality. Themed games dont equal normal. Nor does the fact I have less time now to actively play.
However good try captain try hard 2. -.- Don't poke people for trying BC. Its prpl and austin. Both are experienced enough to know better. Also, marv has outright lied about how he garners reads on me. As he was unsure of my alignment in LX and was basing my alignment on if I got shot n1 or not. Given his tried and true method is not neccesarily in play this game given that there are so many big names to shoot him outright saying I have a tell for him d1 is an outright lie.Now the only reason I mention it is he made a huge deal of foolishness lying yet does it himself. Hypocritical actions make BC sad. Uh ohhhhh......so it WAS "him outright saying" to "well the connotation was there"
yes. that really is a lie.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 07:43 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 07:41 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 13 2013 07:35 marvellosity wrote:
you did also repeatedly call him mafia and fakeclaim DT to call him mafia, BC. Yes, but I was also lynched day 1 no? Pretty sure I'm allowed to attempt risky gambles like that given i was attempting to save town from being retarded. You weren't trying to save town from shit you were trying to survive because you were third party LMAO Don't get me wrong town was being retarded...but come on man....
Huh? BC was town that game no?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
that was Liquid City bish
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 13 2013 07:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 07:40 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 07:39 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 13 2013 05:25 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 04:49 prplhz wrote:I think that BloodyC0bbler is scum. filterBloodyC0bbler starts out by jokingly pushing Ver and slOosh though it turns out that he is being very serious about this. This is similar to his opening post from Storm Mafia where he was scum. Nothing in PTP3, LVIII, Liquid City, LVI, L, all town games and in all games he got down to business. His push on Ver is purely based on how Ver is not around and while BloodyC0bbler drops slOosh he keeps his Ver scum read right up until now. He has been told that Ver said before the game that he wouldn't have time before Monday but this doesn't stop BloodyC0bbler, even though BloodyC0bbler was lynched by a rampant town in his last game when he was in a similar situation to Ver's, having warned the thread about his projected activity but still getting lynched for it. Another really curious thing about the Ver push is this post. It makes no sense at all, because they are experienced they should have written an apology? But an apology (or the lack thereof) has no bearing on alignment at all, it is not hard to write an apology, it just seems too convinient for BloodyC0bbler to use this bad logic to legitimize his push. This Ver push just seems very unlike BloodyC0bbler from his town games. While he does have early reads such as in PTP3 where he had an early Kurumi scum read, he interacts with the thread and he constantly evolves his reads. In a town game where he says in his fourth post that Kurumi is obviously scum, he still has a lot of other opinions and ends up voting differently. He's constantly reevaluating but there's nothing of that in this game. How BloodyC0bbler is acting on D1 in general is curious. BloodyC0bbler is a guy who has a certain opinion of himself. Look at this post where he says that no one can say that he has bad D1 reads because of the list he made. Look at this post where he claims to be one of the most experienced players with the ability to lead. This is in a game with Foolishness, sandroba, Palmar and many other really good players but he still thinks he's the best choice for mayor. He has high thought of himself but he doesn't show that at all in this game, he's actually just sitting back and hoping that Ver will lynch himself. About this very light pushing of Ver, even though he doesn't want to lynch wherebugsgo his activity becomes horrible up until the lynch. The last and biggest thing he does related to the lynch is this post: On March 12 2013 10:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 12 2013 10:02 strongandbig wrote:
I'm with you on wbg, bc
Why is Yamato so important to kill?
I kinda get Ver since he's a well known "good player", although I'm not sure why the timing of a policy lynch matters, but with Yamato it's not like he's on that level and he's under enough pressure that there's no risk of him slipping out of the spotlight. Its not so much policy as meta. But again people can take it as they want. He has meshed up fully with his mafia meta from my experience and I know what hes capable of. Yamato is important because he has played so obviously anti town. As annoying as Kurumi was being he was not actively doing anything others already weren't. Instead he shot him. He shot someone who was likely just a townie roleplaying instead of some mafia trolling. "Its not so much policy as meta", does BloodyC0bbler even know himself why he is lynching Ver? And notice why he wants to lynch yamato77, it's not because he is scum but because he has played "obviously anti town". This is true but that's absolutely no reason to lynch him, this is no reason in itself to think that he is scum. Even when I ask him what he meant with his decafchicken comment he doesn't use that in any way to influence the lynch. There's no "decafchicken was lynched because of dumb coincidence and we shouldn't repeat that here, lets lynch Ver because I have played 50 games with him and my D1 reads are awesome", he's just answering my dumb and largely irrelevant question. Anyway, I really think that BloodyC0bbler is scum. How you guys feel about it? yes. you could well be right. At least i haven't got good reasons to call him town, and normally a town-BC has given me those reasons by now. thats the post by the way. Do you say 100% no. But the connotation that goes with it does suggest it. no, it suggests exactly how VE said it and exactly how it's written. That you've given me reasons to think you're town. Like, it literally says those very words and that is exactly how it was meant. Why is this hard to grasp? Because I know you use varying levels analyzing someone. "leans town, could be town, likely town" Or obvious the opposite. Perhaps its also because one of my best town tells was already posted in this thread by someone and ignored by all. Realistically I don't care why you dislike how I interpret things.
because you said i made an outright lie on something you completely incorrectly took a connotation of. you're calling me a liar because you're making my words into something they aren't. you should care.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
