| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On February 13 2013 09:20 Dandel Ion wrote: I FIND IT KIND OF UNFAIR THAT THE VOTING FOR THE SECRET VOTING IS NOT SECRET TOO WHAT'S THE POINT OF THAT maybe voting for the instant majority lynch should be instant majority | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On February 13 2013 09:22 Crossfire99 wrote: Dude, I know. I am scum and you caught me. You should lynch me. You wound us so | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
I should have written a role that required only all capsq | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
this is possibly the least useful of all responses | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
nice try | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On February 13 2013 12:01 Oatsmaster wrote: Well, I dont think mayor is necessarily good because its not worth the risk IMO. If we vote in scum, We will defiantly not get a scum lynch tomorrow, and also, it basically kills discussion. your reasons are bad you are scum ##unvote ##vote Oatsmaster | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On February 13 2013 12:05 Oatsmaster wrote: And we are gonna get trolly BH this game. Thats totally great. And awesome. the idea that the reason we should choose instant majority over mayoral based on the "risk of electing scum" is preposterous, as is the idea that mayoral would kill discussion. You posted something that appeared townie and "part of the herd" but was nothing but smoke and mirrors. These conclusions are not conclusions a townie would come to. there is no trolling happening here. simply put: you are scum. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On February 13 2013 12:16 gonzaw wrote: Well basically (from what I remember in other games) nobody votes at all and keep discussing stuff until they have the balls to lynch someone, just so they don't hammer too soon. and from what I remember from hosting plenty of instant majority lynch games, this scenario works out really well for town and really poorly for scum | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
unless you have something more to say I think my case stands for itself | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On February 13 2013 12:33 jcarlsoniv wrote: I don't really...see a case? His reasoning isn't necessarily bad, it just differs from yours. Look, think about your thought process as a townie when you evaluated the three options. You probably rejected the Secret Ballot out of hand barring some weird circumstances because it takes information away from town, then you thought about Mayoral and Instant Majority. Thinking about the strengths and drawbacks of both, you'd note that Mayoral elections produce a different kind of discussion than lynch votes (not necessarily better or worse) and the actual vote itself tends to be about who says they'll use the lynch on whom and who you have a town-read on. Instant Majority sounds dangerous but actually buts the scum under a lot of pressure assuming nobody gets dumb and jumps the gun on the hammer. But what you don't think about, and I'm certain nobody town aligned thinks about as a main reason not to use mayoral, is the possibility of making a scum player mayor. It's a risk of mayoral, but it's not the reason you wouldn't run it-- after all, if what the mayor does is pick who gets lynched, picking a scum player to be mayor isn't a huge risk. We're not giving powers to the scumteam, and in fact, having a scum under that spotlight could be very helpful to town. From a townie perspective, which any townie will have, you probably want instant majority because it's simple and lets you lynch someone. You want your vote to do something and you want to put pressure on the scum. You don't reject mayoral because a scum might get elected-- this might actually be the best outcome short of a townie get elected and lynching scum. You reject mayoral because instant majority is better and gives you more power to hunt scum. Oats came into this giving reasoning that comes from a mindset not of townie scumhunting, but of scum shirking responsibility and blending in, and thinking fearfully. I thought this was pretty obvious, guys | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
probably on trying to get md to stop attacking hin | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games gofns13371 Grubby5273 Liquid`RaSZi1628 FrodaN1198 ceh9579 mouzStarbuck430 shahzam387 C9.Mang0321 RotterdaM151 QueenE105 Mew2King69 Trikslyr51 ArmadaUGS40 UpATreeSC17 |
|
Replay Cast
Escore
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
Zoun vs Ryung
Lambo vs ShoWTimE
Big Brain Bouts
Fjant vs Bly
Serral vs Shameless
OSC
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
SHIN vs Bunny
ByuN vs Shameless
WardiTV Invitational
Krystianer vs TriGGeR
Cure vs Rogue
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
