EPTTL Mafia LIX - Page 21
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
I parrot this. No roleblock claims in two consecutive nights so far. How can you think they have a RB? | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
To yams, I missed talking to you after day 1. Your the only one who listen to me. Thanks for being there! Yamato, no mentioning of Chez talking to you? | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
On January 28 2013 10:17 yamato77 wrote: What about that conclusion is surprising? Annul claimed mad hatter, and didn't want us to lynch chezinu. These two flips confirm his as mafia. I didn't want to lynch Chezinu either cause of annul's claim. Doesn't this confirm me as mafia, too? Why shouldn't there be 2 MH? | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
 igs a grave while Mocsta posts* | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
What was the time of contact? Did he tell you about yamatos contact? Mocsta : January 21 2013 08:08 I agree on chezinu. He needs to input more to the thread. I was expecting a lot more from him considering the reputation and kneepad job debears gave. | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
I'd see grush going 100 % vigi with a jack role. | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
Anyway, we know that yamato didn't tell grush anything about Chez, and didn't tell anything to town about Chez. He just told town that he thinks grush is mafia cause he didn't push for more communication. But yamato didn't push for communication either. To be honest, I don't know if I should believe that the ones masoning Chez D1 aren't mafia. You know what I thought of both of them throughout the game, and I could see this as a mindfuck attempt. They never tried to make conclusions openly about Chez's alignment until this day right? Or did yamato tell you something decisive D2, FT? | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
Gonna filter dive a little. | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
You know I see frequent absence announcements as scumtrait? | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
On January 28 2013 10:07 Mocsta wrote: So mafia have framer and roleblocker left and have lost 2 masons.. what are the chances they would have >2 masons on a 5 man team? Given that there is no evidence for a mafia roleblocker, this might be a "townslip"? | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
Would you lynch fuba tomorrow? | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
On January 28 2013 20:12 mkfuba07 wrote: Thanks. I'll take a better look at the logs when I wake up. I'm pretty sure yamato masoned chez. I'm not sure who chez masoned D1. Do we know who grush masoned D2, D3? It seems he also missed his second vote, so he's kind of on my mind. What do you make of this? | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
On January 27 2013 01:31 mkfuba07 wrote: I just realized that if people think I'm the 5th mafia, then all they might want to hear is what I think of my "scumbuddies". BKE is scum based on activity level and decrease in NKs N2. Chez I haven't filtered or anything, but the surety of DS, toad, and FT (particularly FT, since I've clearly come to some disagreement with DS and toad) is telling me to go with it. There were a few things going through the voting thread that go along with a scum chez, so I think it's viable. I guess I'll even vote chez, just to have that second vote on scum until I can find the 5th. ##Vote: Chezinu All I care about is the last scum, because it's not me, and I don't particularly feel like it's yamato or mocsta. Am I the only one in the game who doesn't have debears, stutters, axle, and clarity ruled out? (Again, apologies for missing these,. I'm sure I remember reading something about all of them, but I can't remember for the life of me. In any case, answering me helps town more than yelling at me for not noting it down when I read it the first time.) Also, Vivax, is it time to disclose what you found last night? Because you accuse FT of being scum for (among other incorrect reasons) not releasing who masoned him (which isn't scummy), but you turn around and refuse to divulge your DT check (something that is just infuriating). ...Please? Gotta go walk the dog, be back soon if anyone wants to talk a bit. He wasn't even very interested in Chez until that point, now he says "just to have that vote on scum" | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
On January 26 2013 10:00 DearestSnot wrote: AUSTIN CANNOT BE SCUM. He would have cannibalized gonzaw's day 1 votes; they would not run together What do you think about this? | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
On January 29 2013 01:36 FiveTouch wrote: The reason that Vivax quoted of bugs is an extremely good reason not to, actually. Three major candidates for sherriff - toad, austin, gonzaw. If both gonzaw/austin are mafia then they shouldn't have been running against each other so late in the day, or they should have been giving themselves options to try to get the other into power. None of these things happened. Mind if I correct you? On January 22 2013 05:11 gonzaw wrote: It's obvious I won't be mayor now (it's like 5 hours until deadline right?), so I'm okay with the sheriff position. austin seems likely town as well, and posts his thought process and explanations, and he'd be a good player to have protection from BGs as well, wouldn't mind him being sheriff either. Wouldn't mind Toad being sheriff either, but yeah those successive votes on him seem weird. gonzaw January 22 2013 05:29. austin and Toad, and me obviously. Like some have said, the sheriff role seems perfect for people we want to protect and are likely town and scum would want to kill them (at least after I read that when skimming the thread ) | ||
| ||
