Chrono Trigger Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
##get in the teleporting pod but accidentally be in there with some kind of awesome animal thus gaining its powers and abilities | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 01:18 Mementoss wrote: Since you weren't wearing anything that would mess with the pods, the pods worked as intended! Both you and the animal got teleported to the 2nd pod 20 feet right of you! *Everyone Cheers* What a rush! ##buy some really reflective clothing teleporter pods work like microwave ovens right? with, like, some kind of radiation? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
like, fuck | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 11:01 Promethelax wrote: I see Acro has sniped me in terms of the idea of any potential leader posting their core group. Has anyone played in a similar set-up before? Or does anyone have the link to Resistance? I haven't read it. Based on the fact that Acro had the same though as me and from our last game together I would currently, put him in my team, along with Acro I would add Marv (come on, wouldn't you?) and as third player I would chose Hapa. Hapa is a guy who over many games I have come to like and respect though I once hated him. He is a great town player and a kinda crappy scum player, seems like the right guy to have along for the ride. TL:DR My team: Acro, Marv, Hapa I'm curious if putting one player who seems like a liability (one of the guys known for trolling or one of the smurfs) onto the team so that we can get a read on them from their actions makes sense? It seems like we won't have lynches but knowing who scum is/is not will help town players direct any and all actions which they have and i assume making sure that non-town players not being on the quest team will be a good thing for us as the OP specifies that they can make it more difficult to achieve our objectives. I actually really like the bolded idea, especially if the party leader explicitly says which of their party they're picking as the "liability" and why. Personally, I think this could be a good way to get reads on people like Marv and Toad who are notoriously hard to pin down. fyi to the thread, I'm supposed to be at work in ten minutes (lol) but I'll be reading through the thread as the afternoon goes on and I'll be posting my reactions to things I see like this. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 11:03 Clarity_nl wrote: I'm reading up on resistance mafia, as it was said the setups might be simillar in some ways and I'm not familiar with it. Just got lynched in my other game so can focus on this starting tomorrow. I nominate myself as our heroic leader because almost everyone here doesn't know me. That way you won't be fooled by people playing wifom games with their meta! this is probably a joke/troll post but if he's serious this is some terrible logic | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 11:17 sandroba wrote: I hereby declare I want to lead you simpletons to victory. My party selection will be as following: I will choose 3 of the less known players who I read as town at the end of the day to compose the party. The reasoning is that this mechanic will greatly favor town in attempting to confirm players. This is better done for players less likely to get shot for 2 reasons: 1) They have less meta information available on them therefore harder to read. 2) Vets/Well known players are likely to get killed n1 if they are town, even more so given a successful mission, mitigating some of the advantage town might get. This serves to both preserve the good/known players and to keep the confirmed/likely town around longer. I'd like everyone to chime in on this subject of party selection and help come to the optimum way of doing things. tone: lol content: I worry that this might be overestimating the importance of figuring out which players are town, and underestimating the importance of actually winning the minigames. Remember, this was the game where the hosts warned that it might be impossible to balance, that implies to me that things other than just finding scum to kill might be important. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 11:30 kushm4sta wrote: IMO: Put the scummiest people on the team. The event will probably involve losing hp. We want scum to lose hp. Also it will give us more play to analyze. this is a terrible idea, see above | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 22 2012 00:12 Hopeless1der wrote: Woah woah woah, that sounds like setup speculation. Better stop that asap lol don't sail the tides of time without a tiller (also don't mix your metaphors without good ice and a shaker) | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 12:47 marvellosity wrote: TheChronicler, take a moment, sip a glass of wine, and ponder why every single person who has read your idea has thought it terrible. It's either because you're a genius, transcended on a plane above any of us mere mortals, or your idea is bad. lol (this thread is long, just wanted to say hi) | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 12:55 iamperfection wrote: So you guys are looking for someone that has a very distinguishable town meta as opposed to his scum meta. Hrm let me think about this for a second??????? hrm who could it possibly me........... Wait a tick fucking me thats who I nominate the perfect one as the leader because he is the best choice. Not only am i town this game i also have a very distinguishable town meta from my scum meta. Also the perfect one is known for his generosity and his fairness i am very active and will be able to keep up with the thread very easily so i will easily take the towns input for selecting my team So vote iamperfection 2012 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm yeah I can assert this too, doesn't make it true or useful | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 12:57 Acrofales wrote: Fine. My town read is on TheChronicler. He's either new to the game or a longtime vet fucking with us. In the former case, a noob scum would not be proposing some shitty plan like that. In the latter, he was gauging reactions and hoping to get scum to bite. Also, not a scumplay. It's not a very useful town read, though, because I don't want to vote for him precisely because his plan was terrible. huh like, how random is this? I mean, i can give or take the logic, but did you really need to explain your useless town read right then? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 13:05 iamperfection wrote: also why do we have to have the leader select all 3 wouldn't it be best for the town to put some input on the other team members? I feel like this was already discussed to death (with thechronicler's terrible plan, among others); why bring it up again just then? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 13:01 Z-BosoN wrote: That being said, I'm thinking we should actually vote sandroba. I've heard he is a capable player and a few people have mentioned that he is easier to pin down when scum. We then impose that he gives us every single line of thought on why he's chosen the party members (trying to choose town of course), and play on based from the result of the mission and from the assumptions I've made earlier on. If he's scum, we should be able to catch him on these grounds. So I'm not convinced "voting someone to get a read on them" makes sense. For one thing, we should probably be able to get a read on the main candidates based on their platforms etc - they're already putting themselves out there more than most players, and giving us more material (or, if they're not that's pretty significant also). But also - I think it's gonna be pretty important to win the minigames. Until we have done a few and (hopefully) know a little more about their implications, I don't think we want to risk losing them to get better reads on people. also this has probably already been discussed to death on the pages following this quote so if this is obsolete, my b | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 13:11 Hapahauli wrote: Why are you pre-determining who to include in your party right now? Certainly you couldn't have THAT strong of a town read on the both of them. this is silly. he could change his reads, obvy, but if he actually wants people to vote for him it only makes sense to tell them "these are some of my town reads" so then the voters can be like "oh man his townreads are great lets vote for him" or "oh man his townreads suck that person totally didn't look town when he said that." I mean, it's a damn sight better than just asserting "my town reads are the shit bros" | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 13:17 Hapahauli wrote: @ iamp Welcome! As distinguishable as you are, that's not the only thing we're looking for in a party leader. I'd prefer someone with a very strong track-record of accurate D1 town reads. You're definitely someone that can be read early and be a party candidate though. @ Kei Err... but you said... Do explain good sir. ehrmagerd he was inconsistent wooooooooooooooow this is a big deal guys (no it's not) not feeling the hapa happenin right now | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 13:25 Hapahauli wrote: 1) "I'm not going to vote marv unless I have a town read on him." 2) "I'm going to vote someone unless he's giving me a 'scummy vibe.'" Those two statements mean very different things. The first expresses reservation - that you're not going to vote someone UNLESS you have a town read on them. The second expresses no hesitancy - that you're vote is determined unless marv shows you otherwise. On November 21 2012 13:30 Hapahauli wrote: @ GK Ah that makes sense. I'm still don't care for such early D1 town reads, but that's just my own attitude and nothing to hold you accountable for. @ Z-Bo Ok ok I know I super-tunneled you that one game based on stupid wordings and such, but this one seems a lot more clear-cut no? Like those two statements do not mean the same thing at all. THIS TIME IT'S DIFFERENT! | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 14:08 Hapahauli wrote: Oh you're totes right on GSL III - completely forgot. Well I still don't understand the marv thing, but I don't think it makes you scummy. And that is my cue to hit the sack - gnite! hapa still not happening for me | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 14:27 Dienosore wrote: Look at it this way: I have no idea who any of you are, and none of you know me. Therefore, I can't abuse any preconceived notions or reads you have on me because they just dont exist. If I'm elected the leader, I promise to publicly consider every move before it happens. I will try to do so in such a manner that hopefully leaves no sour taste in anyones mouth. + Show Spoiler + campaign poster lol wow this guy I just don't know what to make of this I mean I guess iamperfection is right, what noobly scum player would do this? But... this just makes no sense so hard. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 17:09 Toadesstern wrote: This Keirathi guy is mafia. Not because of what he's saying but because of what he's failing to provide: Reasoning as to why he'd post what he did so far. There's simply no reason to get out here and tell people he's planning to heavily focus on reading one guy. Best case scenario is him being pointless, worst case scenario is him trying to look good by providing "something" while actually being pointless. I'd say we've got someone who's trying to get a cheap backdoor exit early on. this.... feels pretty silly to me | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 22 2012 07:26 Clarity_nl wrote: snb, I beg you, just read the whole thread and then join us in current discussion, rather than 12-hour-ago-discussion oh, I just noticed it. okay, I guess I can do that. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 22 2012 01:11 kushm4sta wrote: I actually don't care at all who is elected leader. I just said that shit before about making the scummiest leader because I wanted to contribute something unique. okay i know i said i would stop doing this but i am actually laughing out loud right now | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 22 2012 02:45 CaveJohnson wrote: New and fluffy are harder to read and likely to make mistakes. If they prove themselves to be town and competent somehow: Wonderful. However if they fail to do that they need to go down before the end game. So far I don't ever see the dinosaur changing and so he's on my needs to die list. Before you call me an easy target again I am including myself in the needs to die before end game list since I'm smurfing. fuck i was really happy that i was gonna get to play a themed game without drazerk in it but no | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
yeah I got to your post a couple minutes after I posted that | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
I just finished reading this massive thread I also have yet to vote. I am thus a swing voter and demand pandering. As far as I can tell, there are three "real" campaigns (real meaning the candidate actually intends to get elected) - Sandroba, Syllogism, and Toad. All three campaigns are based around the fundamental premise "i'm a vet, i'm town, i have good reads, and i'm self confident enough to take responsibility for my actions." Unless I've missed something, that's pretty much 100% of syllogism's campaign. Sandroba has his "get some noobs semi confirmed" thing Toad says he'll talk a lot Out of those, I gotta say Sandroba's got the lead on talking points, so I have questions for the other two: Syllogism, it's been a pretty long time since you started your campaign. You said you weren't going to lock yourself in to your party or whatever early, but do you have anything more for us by now? Or is it 100% that you're running because you know you're town and you're still not sure of Sandroba? Toad, why do you need to be the party leader to do that stuff you were saying you would do about getting people to talk about reads, and putting yourself under scrutiny so we get a better read on you? Shouldn't you be doing all that anyway, and why is it a campaign point? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 22 2012 04:44 Toadesstern wrote: Hey S&B what's your take on how Marv's acting so far? oh also I forgot to answer this I liked his takedown of cave johnson I also think marv is way more egotistical as scum than he is as town, it's something about the "bwahahaha fools i'll kill you all" mentality. so the fact that he's not running for king of daventry makes me think he's probably town. Why do you ask about marv specifically? why ask me? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
this thread Anyone interested in a late switch to Marv? I've got a pretty strong town read on him right now, and I can't say that I like Syllo's election platform. marv if you were magically blasted into being a serious candidate would you tell people your picks so they can evaluate whether they agree with your reads or would you do a syllo and keep them secret? I'm also a little T_T that no one has talked any more about platforms/ideas for "party composition themes" like Sandro had, I do think having been in a successful party is a statistical indicator of townieness and the idea of spreading that out makes sense. That said, I'm not voting for Sandroba until he actually takes Syllo's case a little bit more seriously - seems like it's a reason people are dropping off his campaign wagon but he really has barely even mentioned it. there's some pretty srs reasoning there. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
i had a dream last night where i found out that cavejohnson was actually a smurf run by a friend of mine from college (who doesn't play mafia at all) and then I felt terrible for accusing him of being drazerk. True story | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 23 2012 05:26 Hapahauli wrote: @ Marv Who are you currently supporting? I've seen you tear down a bunch of campaigns, but you've proposed no alternative yourself. @ Cave Johnson Yes let's sheep a guy without thinking about his alignment because we think the other guy is scum. Nevermind making a read on the guy we're voting, let's just consolidate. Someone needs to shoot/attack/kill/whatever this guy. marv was like one of the first people to vote syllogism. when even I am following the thread closer than you are, you have a problem | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
not like it matters who i vote for, but whatever every vote counts DEMOCRACY FUCK YEAH I still don't agree with Syllo's decision not to tell people who his party members are. I guess it's possible that would make it easier for scum to fuck with shit, but imo it's worth running that risk, if him telling the town who he would pick enables the town to make a more informed decision / give feedback on his townreads, and thus be more likely to get a team of townies. then there's Sandro, I don't like how he pretty much brushed off Syllo's evaluation of his alignment then there's this last-minute campaign by hapa. there is a bunch of stuff I don't like in hapa's filter - he has long serieses of posts really digging in on things that are completely unimportant, and seems kinda hypocritical in a way that makes me doubt his alignment (example: On November 21 2012 11:55 Hapahauli wrote: Ok, but again, your point is? Do you disagree with me or something? If so, speak up. Otherwise, these random passive accusations are pointless and stupid. then later On November 21 2012 13:17 Hapahauli wrote: @ iamp Welcome! As distinguishable as you are, that's not the only thing we're looking for in a party leader. I'd prefer someone with a very strong track-record of accurate D1 town reads. You're definitely someone that can be read early and be a party candidate though. @ Kei Err... but you said... Do explain good sir. /example) Out of the people who have votes, that leaves me with Kitaman. I have about the same level of town read on him as Syllogism - mostly based on my gut and the fact that if there is a scum candidate, I think it's more likely to be Sandroba or Hapahauli - and I also think his team seems mostly town (although I don't have a read one way or the other on prome). so ##vote: kitaman | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 23 2012 06:39 marvellosity wrote: you've talked to me plenty enough that you should be, dear ^^ not everything you want to share with Keirathi is so easily communicable (see keirathi there you go) | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 23 2012 06:55 Z-BosoN wrote: Strong town read on marv? Really? If marv hadn't told be beforehand he wasn't gonna take this game seriously, I would have gone with scum read on marv. He spends a ton of time arguing with cave fellow for no reason at all, the guy is and has been a lost cause since he began posting. He's not nearly as active and as involved as his other games. He's not willing to run for party. I've reread his filter and there is nooooo way you can get a town read on marv that fast, with that kind of bad reasoning. Someone else had a town fast, with zero reasoning. Especially SNB, who's played with him a ton of times. SnB's filter though seems pretty much like his town filter from last game, in terms of low activity and post coutn, but I haven't played with him much. Marv, do you have any meta read on him? lol nice case bro | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 23 2012 06:58 marvellosity wrote: i wouldn't mind hearing from him why he thinks i'm town, though. aww you're no fun anyway mostly it's, like, meta-meta On November 22 2012 08:22 strongandbig wrote: oh also I forgot to answer this I liked his takedown of cave johnson I also think marv is way more egotistical as scum than he is as town, it's something about the "bwahahaha fools i'll kill you all" mentality. so the fact that he's not running for king of daventry makes me think he's probably town. Why do you ask about marv specifically? why ask me? it's not like i think i can read your "posting style" or whatever. it's more like, behavioral psychology I guess? tbh i can't see "scum marv" not running for party leader on day 1 unless he was teammates with Ace but i can easily see "town marv" not running for party leader day 1 in a town with syllo or sandro, especially if he had a town read on them so yeah I could be wrong but I doubt it very much. (also: toad you never answered me, why'd you ask me about marv spcifically?) | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 23 2012 07:25 Keirathi wrote: I'm not sure what to think about S&B. He's mostly been trolling again. His huge town read on marv is pretty silly, imo, which you agree with. Other than that, he hasn't really said much of substance. Mostly null. Adam I'm a little biased towards I think. He came in with a meta-based town read on me, which while not necessarily a strong reason for me being one alignment or the other (since I'm pretty self-aware of my own meta), it seems weird for a scum Adam to pick me of all people to give that kind of town read to. I'm not exactly a stellar player, nor likely to influence much of day 1. Seems like scum Adam, knowing what vets were town, would have been better off backing them rather than me. Slightly green shaded null, I guess. keir do you honestly think i'm "trolling" this game? like, am i being anything comparable to last game? Cause I don't want last game to go down again | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 23 2012 07:31 Keirathi wrote: Maybe trolling is the wrong word. Not-caring is more appropriate, but yes. T_T | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
Flying to visit my old college roommate in Britain I'll post as much as I can but idk how consistent wifi ill have Plz not to kill me like last time I went on vacation - that's the only time I've ever been mostly chef an I'd rather not repeat it | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
And I'll be back on monday | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
Damn you autocorrect | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 23 2012 23:29 Djodref wrote: So you get to not be present in this game but not sandro ?? What the fuck with the double standards ? I didnt vote him because he is afk. I voted him because he came back after syllo posted the case but he decided not to address it any further than saying "sorry that you think I'm mafia". Also - the guy I'm visiting doesn't have wifi and I can't log in to his Ethernet so ima post as much as I can from Starbucks For the next hour or so | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
My lappy ran out of batteries so I'm on my phone now Anyway it looks like two important things happened in the last 24 hours, quite strong cases on the chronicler and kitaman. I think the most damning thing against the chronicler is the way he responded to the contradiction in his play by trying to pretend it didn't exist. There obviously was a contradiction between his plan, which would have had a bunch of people make town reads, and his contention that giving town reads is bad because it lets scum know who to shoot, but the chronicler tries to explain he wanted "strong reads but not town reads" or some such crap - I don't buy it. And instead of saying "yeah that is a contradiction, but here were my town motives for saying both of those things (which IMO should be the natural townie way to respond to that), he tries to say "there is no contradiction" by using silly semantic arguments. Only scum care that much about consistency, IMO. The other important thing is all the suspicion on kitaman. Marv just posted a big case on Kita, so I'm not going to go through it in super detail right now, but what Marv said rings true for me. That said, I'm happy with where my vote is now. While sandroba did respond to Syllos args (finally once he got to a million votes), he didn't address the central point - that he didn't care about finding scum. It's not about what he did it didn't say, it's about the attitude he took towards the game. Syllogism got a strong read on sandroba by analyzing his attitude across his day 1 posts. Reading Sandros filter yesterday with syllogisms case in mind it rang true for me, and nothing sandro said today makes me doubt that. I also haven't seen anything out of hapahauli to make me really reconsider the previous read ("probably scum, not 100%") I had on him. However, I'm most confident about the outcome of a lynch on sandro right now. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
I don't see the scum motivation, the case boils down to "this guy voted weird get him" | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 25 2012 03:10 Oatsmaster wrote: Lets bring the spotlight on some selected players. 1. Phagga. His reasoning is really weak for voting for Kita as opposed to voting for either Syllo/Sand. Furthermore he is not comfortable of 1 of the players in the party, Prome. Why would town phagga vote for kita when he is not comfortable with prome? If 1 scum is in the party, the party would fail, the thread thinks. However, other than this, his activity looks pretty town aligned to me. He shows interest in finding scum and his posts have good reasoning and logic. 2. VE. This player is interesting because he replaced BioSC, a player who was VERY EXCITED before the game began but posted practically nothing and asked to be replaced out. VE was also really excited for the game, before he knew he was replacing in. VE then posts a long ass posts with 2 scum reads which frankly are not very well explained. He then disappears. I find this interesting because 2 excited players, suddenly become extremely quiet when they are in the game. Could it be related to their role? or their alignment. For now I think that we should keep an eye on VE, if he continues to be silent, I would find it very suspicious This only works if the role is one both players dislike, ish about bioscience but I think ve is the rare bet who doesn't hate playing scum Unless you thing they're 3partt? Anyway Starbucks is closing so ill have to find more Internet. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 27 2012 02:16 marvellosity wrote: I imagine s&b also picked up on my breadcrumb from earlier: STARSENSES im back from the UK and there are like a thousand unread posts in this thread i can only try.... | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 26 2012 23:28 Djodref wrote: Ok guys, just a quick comment regarding the last developments of the thread, I find that Prome is getting way too much heat for the all the role-related stuff. Arguments like "your role is imb4 for town, you must be scum" are wrong, just plain wrong. Never trust Grey, right ? Moreover, the events corroborate the story. So I don't see why we should doubt this at this point. Regarding Acro, I personally think that he is taking too much heat, even if not wanting to be in the party seems suspicious at first sight. I would say it's role or ability related (his own ability or targeted by another player). And like, there are players whose behavior is not acceptable at all. For example, let's say that Toad, VE, Adam and S&B are the mafia players left. They would have nothing do to and could just watch the town atmosphere rotten. There are too many damn lurkers and I hate this because we have nothing for or against them ! Anyway, I have decided to step up and I'm going to officially announce that I'm going to inflict some damage tonight, and it's going to be one player among iamp, S&B, VE and Adam. I have not been using this since the beginning of this game so it's gonna hurt. Be warned. I would like anyone who is pissed off by their attitude (seriously Adam, you and your "I'm lurking and I assume" attitude, I hope that you are going to die tonight), to join me and to inflict some damage on these players. I'm on this for real and I would guess that some other players would have no problem to join me as well Any ability you have to pressure the fucking lurkers (ie not using against the mafia), just use it against them, for the future sake of the town and also to teach them how to play. Who is in ? why does djodref keep talking about me... i wasn't lurking, i just couldn't access the internet | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
that seems like a thing just now | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 27 2012 09:54 Mementoss wrote: Clarification, since Marvellosity died, half the party would be 1.5/3. There are no half people in this game. So technically only 1/3 of the remaining alive party can be taken for this party. That is all. so if we want to only take people who "have been in a previous successful party" that means syllo, oats, clarity, dieno, and keirathi oats, clarity, and dieno were all in the party this time and we can only take one of them so that means we have to add at least one new person | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 27 2012 10:04 TheChronicler wrote: I may or may not have checked anyone this cycle. I will point to the most likely culprit were I not to have used popcorn and instead used a different ability. 200 gold Popcorn what | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 27 2012 10:06 Hapahauli wrote: I would like to run for party leader My party will be Dienosaur, Kei, and either Chronicler or Acro If you for whatever reason do not feel safe with Chronicler/Acro, I can add Oatsmaster in that slot. Why you can trust me I think the parties I proposed above are as near confirmed town as we can get in this situation. Given this player pool, you can trust me. Why? Because if we failed the mission, I would be holding a neon-sign saying "LYNCH ME." This is suicidal for me to do as scum. i don't think we should be treating the party election like a dt check given the relative number of parties vs lynches so far i feel like winning the events is the most important thing so i only want people who i think are town to be in the party | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 27 2012 10:07 TheChronicler wrote: How is this difficult to understand? The ability costs 200g. I didn't start with infinite gold. I have not received any gold since the start of the game. yeah i get that i meant the "point to the most likely culprit" i thought since you said your ability was ineffective you were going to like guess who roleblocked you or smth then i figured out what you actually meant | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
(*) idk whether there are goodies every time or w/e but if there is a chance of goodies spreading it out makes sense (*) what i said above about hapa ##vote: keirathi dieno you and oats can't be on the team together this time | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 27 2012 10:16 Hapahauli wrote: Sure I would. A team of Syllo, Dieno, Kei would be basically confirmed town. If we failed the mission with me as leader, I'd be immediately outing myself as scum. I'm only doing this because I indeed have nothing to lose since I'm town. maybe scum can "decide whether to sabotage the party or play along" maybe the scum team knows something we don't and is freaking out about our winning three in a row never trust greymist man | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
just caught up with teh threadzor so correct me if i'm wrong but we're picking dienosore to be party leader because he might get masamune? keirathi do you think it would help you at all to be the party leader instead of a party follower? also i think that hopeless is scum even though it turns out acro is 3p - some of the things that hopeless has done since being checked seem to me like scum in desperation like the whole thing about being on a party - this and hapa's thing and the chronicler all have done it - like i said to hapa before, i'm suspicious of anyone who says "put me in the party" instead of just relying on their townieness to be self-evident or whatever, because scum might have more information than we do and they might be starting to really want us to fail a mission some other stuff: On November 27 2012 12:49 Hopeless1der wrote: I think we've decided that our Party leader is going to be one of our previous party members. Oats cannot lead. That leaves:
Only one of Dienosore and Oatsmaster can be on the party due to setup restrictions. Oatsmaster and Syllogism have already led a party before and have items to show for it. I believe the leaders receive an item upon a successful mission completion. Either we try to pool resources to one player (i.e. syllo today) or we divvy up the spoils among as many players as possible while maintaining a successful party. I don't like the idea of powering up one player for a number of reasons: Scum might be able to steal items Items may be lost upon death The player may in fact be scum I'd prefer syllo and oats not be in the party at all because they currently hold items, but if we can't identify a 4th for the team, I'd pick dieno over oats and have syllo step in to fill the last spot. My choice for party leader is one of Keir, Dieno and Clarity. As I've already stated, I'd like to be included in the party. If any of them are inclined to give me the 4th spot, I'd be delighted and they will receive my vote. In the meantime, I'm fine sheeping the current votelead on Keir. ##Vote: Keirathi Also, I hereby state that I won't put a last-minute voteswitch onto Toad today, in case anyone suspects shenanigans. like, seriously - what is the point of saying that last bit... then there's the fact that his response to a red check from tc was "bring it bitches" like, he answers the whole case point by point and then he doesn't address the check itself... tc's long case post was actually pretty bad, but after hopeless went through the case and answered it point by point, instead of actually addressing the dt check, he's just like "bring it" - that doesn't feel very town to me then there's this "im untargetable tonight" thing. i don't understand what he's trying to head off here - townies would use negative abilities on toad, and scum would use negative abilities on pretty much anyone other than h1 or toad. the only thing that seems likely to hit h1 is maybe another dt check, so i don't see how him making himself untargetable or telling us he's untargetable are helpful to town | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
acro why did you decide to claim, i don't see it in your filter | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 28 2012 08:01 goodkarma wrote: This case is pretty bad. The singlemindedness with which you push hopeless without any thought for how he could have town motivations for his actions is pretty suspicious... what are you talking about, what singlemindedness? this is like the first time i've talked about hopeless... i mean, disagree with my case if you want, but how am i being singleminded or scummy here? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 28 2012 08:29 Djodref wrote: I'm not here I have to go to work. I was catching up with the thread after my morning shower and stuff... I have never claimed anything. I lied about the usage an ability that I could still have (hint: I cannot shoot anybody in fact) and I've managed to force iamp and Adam to participate. I really liked both their reactions and I'm not wooried about them anymore. It's not the case for S&B and VE. In our last game, S&B started to do some real townie stuff when he was on the verge of being lynched. My view on him right now is that he can and have to do better if he is town. But I don't have a strong scum read on him. Null for me atm. My problem is that I don't know how to force them to participate more. And, seriously, you can totally trust Dieno to me. This ability is for real. I didn't breadcrumb but you can see some hint in my filter for my D2 save. there's honestly nothing you can do, i will just be participating more my lack of participation was due to going on a trip to visit my old roommate in england, where i didn't have reliable internet access | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 28 2012 08:51 goodkarma wrote: I'll make a definitive case on you yet today. Just don't lurk too hard in the meantime. k | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
it's just that the way hopeless responded to having a red check on him (back when a lot of people thought acro was town) didn't seem to me like how a townie would respond | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
what do you think of the early stuff on hapa like, i'm aware it wasn't very well expressed, but do you think hapa was being suspiciously focused on distractions and things that weren't relevant to alignments, or do you think i'm suffering from confirmation bias | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 28 2012 10:03 iamperfection wrote: And i cant believe you said something like this im gonna have to go through your entire filter when i have time lol wow | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
you claiming third party? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
maybe it's pun-triggered | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
I chose phagga! below are some quotes and summaries of stuff from his filter, along with my analysis. My conclusion is: phagga is probably town, but I'm not confident enough to agree with putting him on a party yet. Most of the stuff I found in his filter made me lean townie; the doubts come from what's missing. I'll put that at the end of this post. On November 21 2012 16:12 phagga wrote: I like Sandroba's plan, his logic is sound. However, I find it dangerous to derive a town read from it, nothing is stopping scum to put up this plan to get themselfes elected. Why is everyone asking for town reads? I understand that the mechanics are working differently, but everyone just spreading their townreads like the flu will only make it easier for scum to decide who to shoot at night. People like Keirathi and me who have no desire in being elected D1 should not be giving out any townreads, instead we can actually scum hunt in the traditional way and establish ourselfes as town this way. I even think that most candidates should not be throwing out their town reads unless they seem to be a serious candidate (meaning several people have voiced interest in voting that person). this is good, sandroba's plan actually was good but phagga went against calling him town because of it, that's what a smart townie should've done. then there's a bunch of questions, most of them are pretty insightful so they don't read to me like someone trying to fake activity, but they're also something that scum could easily do so just because they're the right questions to be asking doesn't make them a town tell. He has a little list of reads, just on three players; usually I don't like list posts, but this is a weird game and the need to find a party makes me think read list posts are less bad than normal; plus the reads all make sense to me given the information we had at the time. On November 22 2012 18:55 phagga wrote: I have not read all the posts yet, I just arrived at the point where Syllo addresses Sandro regarding unanswered questions here. I have not named a candidate yet because I do not have a clear town read on one yet. I was leaning on Sandroba the whole time, and I also tend to think that Syllo is town. However, I only have a very rough idea on how these guys play scum, and I don't trust them enough yet. Also I don't like it at all that they are almost uncontested. As someone said earlier, mafia should have an interest at getting this spot too, and somehow I would expect some heavier resistance. Unless Sand and Syllo are both scum, of course, but Orcams Razor probably says no. Kita was always in the back of my head because I liked his opening post. I was aware that he went MIA for a while, but I still thought that his candidature was serious. So when I realized that barely anyone talked about him, I thought I'd use Acros post to see if I could get some info on what people thought about him. Also, as I wrote earlier, I do think more competition is needed, and since Toad is out of the race, that leaves Kita as the most promising competitor to Sandro/Syllo. Regarding his proposed team: Dieno has claimed after I talked about the possibility to be 3rd party, and the way is behaving I think I could meanwhile accept him in the party, although there are other players that I would prefer. Prom is the one I feel really unsure about. I hope Kita thinks that one over. Nevertheless, for the time being, he gets my vote. ##Vote Kitaman Goodkarmas candidature comes surprising, and I first liked his approach for the candidature. However, I voiced my suspicion of him yesterday, and his choice of Sandro for the team looks like a joke, as you can see in my questions to him. I will be very busy today. I should be in the thread for sure in the last 2-3 hours before deadline. Hopefully I will be able to interact some more earlier. This makes me lean town on him. He'd positioned himself earlier so that he could reasonably join sandroba's campaign at any time without looking suspicious, by saying "i like sandroba's ideas but it's too early to have a town read on him," but he doesn't take that opportunity to try and boost sandroba's momentum. Then there's some more questions. I especially like how he follows up with the questions when they get ignored, that's something that scum can also do but it makes me feel more townie on him. + Show Spoiler + On November 24 2012 02:57 phagga wrote: Ok, now that I've gone through Goodkarma's filter, I know why I thought he might be scum. When you look through his filter, literally the first half of it he almost only talks about what town should do, what people should do (with the one exception of his very first ingame post). There is a ton of stuff that just does not bring town anywhere. He looks like he is contributing, but nothing is really helping town. Also, the tone of his posts seems so neutral, as if he was emotionally completely detached. This is probably what others described as "constructed", for me it is just strange because it seems he does not care at all. The best example for this is this post: He says he is upset, and calls it a scandal, which means it must have pissed him off. Bbut the tone of the post does not feel this way, it rather sounds as if he actually does not care. Then, this post is an improvement. I actually liked that post from him, even if it was a bit long and overexplaining. But then he posted that he would have Sandroba on his team, and I was really confused by that. Afterwards, it seems back to the old ways for him. When I look at his posts from today, it is mostly defending himself, a vote and post to sandroba, that's it. Tl;dr: Too much fluff, a single scum read on the Bus of the day, looks emotionally detached. Now, it is possible that this is his normal way of playing/writing, I am not familiar with his meta. However, for the above reasons, Goodkarma stands on the scummy side for me. Goodkarma: I see you have voted Sandroba. Can you name me up to three other people you also find suspicious, and why? I don't need a whole case, a short explanation what you think is scum motivated in their play would suffice. On November 26 2012 07:27 phagga wrote: Ok, I've updated my read on GK and I would no longer lynch him. When the D2 lynch came to a close, he asked people to consolidate on either sandroba or Toad. He tried to shut down any discussion that would bring in new candidates. considering that Sandro is confirmed scum and Toad is very very likely scum, I don't see the mafia motivation behind is behaviour. also, the way he acts D3 seems more pro-town than on the first day. All in all, I put GK on null for the moment. This could be interpreted either as scummy or as townie behavior. Scummy: "he makes a weak case but doesn't vote on it, then backs off his case when it doesn't get traction." Townie: "He makes a decent 'exploratory case' where he explains his suspicions to get people talking about the person he's suspicious of, but later he's willing to update his reads based on new information and new actions taken by people." Personally, I lean towards the townie interpretation, but that's influenced by what I've seen up above in his filter. I wanted to make sure to point this out though, it seems like the most serious "case" or scumread that phagga has made in the thread so it should be a focal point on reading him. This is what actually made me wonder a bit. the analysis phagga does on goodkarma is pretty much the only deep analysis he does of any player. the fact that phagga backed off of goodkarma isn't necessarily scummy, the ability to get out of a tunnel is important for a townie to have. however, phagga doesn't appear to replace his goodkarma read with other scumreads or deep analysis of other players. Additionally, phagga does a lot of questioning and following up and pushing his questions, but there's very little analysis or explanation of how he likes peoples' responses to those questions and how they respond. That's why I am reluctant to support phagga being on the party, in the theoretical situation where he was being considered - even though the things in his filter seem town to me, it feels like there is a component missing. I definitely don't want to lynch phagga or to have vigs shoot him, however. Now, phagga I have a couple of questions for you:
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
First off, I took 100 damage last night. Whoever shot me, please to cut it out asap. I think I was a pretty unlikely target for a scum hit, so that makes me think it was goodkarma or some other dumb townie shooting me instead of trying to focus fire and take out toad. If you shot me, please claim it and explain why you thought shooting me was a better move than shooting toad so we could actually have a debate and use our lynch today to find a non-confirmed scum. On November 29 2012 12:01 Promethelax wrote: It doesn't have to change your vote. I also think that voting Toad is the best play right now. Unless we can hit him for more later and can lynch confirmed scum this cycle anyways. Does his claimed damage taken make sense to you? That is do you have more than 774 max HP? According to this chrono trigger boss guide, Queen Zeal has more hp than almost any other boss - except for the "rust tyrano" (which is supposed to be easy but have a lot of hp, apparently) and Lavos. Since I see no reason not to trust acro's rolecheck right now, I would definitely believe that toad has a buttload of hp. That said, as I mentioned above, I think focus firing toad was the right move last night. Occam's razor suggests that he is probably lying about being bulletproof. Still, I guess there's an argument to be made about whether we want to use our lynch today on someone other than toad, since drazerk apparently already did a boatload of damage to toad and it should be easier to kill him than a full hp scum. But given that toad survived the night, I think we should KISS (<3 marv) and kill the scum in front of us. ##vote: toad On November 29 2012 12:13 Djodref wrote: Oh, and if anyone is doubting my save of Dieno, I would like them to say it now or shut up forever. Can I also be considered almost confirmed town for it ? Just saying this so you can send me on a party anytime whithout too much doubts now. This makes sense to me, i doubt scum would use up so much damage potential just to get djodref into a party. It's not like he becomes auto confirmed, if the party fails when he's in it he'll still get suspicion just like anyone in that position would. (by "that position" i mean, if the first time they are in a party that party fails aka goodkarma). On November 29 2012 15:08 Promethelax wrote: Has anyone ever seen Zbo be so...under the radar? I guess he has exams but he also didn't say that pre-game and, along with VE, SnB and Risk his lurking is worrying me. It isn't something I expect from any of the three of them, though I guess Risk being in a mason qt makes sense for this. You four: I'd like more from you. Like I straight up had forgotten SnB was playing this game when he posted earlier. Nothing any of these four players have done has stuck with me which is not what I would expect. They are the kind of players whom I expect more from. Does anyone have any insight the could share? Sorry bro. I had internet troubles up until Monday. For the last couple of days I think I've been posting about as much as I usually do in games during the work week, this game has just been super active (making me look bad lol). Anyway, I'll be talking about goodkarma in the next post, but I don't want us to lose sight of hopeless1der, who I still think looks quite bad for his response to the parity check on him out of thechronicler. Syllogism and Promethelax, I don't think you guys have recently commented on that (if I've missed it sorry) - what do you think about hopeless1der's alignment at the moment? Also phagga, I'm still interested in your read on Kita. I think he's a tough player to read this game and your reasoning about him would help make me more certain about my read on you. If you just don't have time to go through his filter in depth because he's not a scum read and therefore not a priority, then I'm in no position to criticize you, but in that case I would still like a few words on what makes him a non-scumread. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 29 2012 12:43 iamperfection wrote: also i think proms case is very strong and coupled with the fact of the mission failure and his shit lurker shoot list i think gk is scum this is a pretty good summary, the case is good even without taking the mission failure into account. I don't like GK's response to a few points in the case. I'm not going to quote the whole back-and-forth here, because I really don't have time to dig through the quote nesting. I'll just post what I don't like about the response:
On the other hand, I don't think the phagga association thing is a big deal even if GK is scum, I could see a scum easily doing that with a townie (since they know their read will be right). On November 29 2012 13:59 Promethelax wrote: Okay, you've replied. I've explained my points. I'm going to stop helping you shit up the thread now. Other players: I'd like your comments on GK's claim and what that does/doesn't do to exonerate him. I'd also like those of you who haven't weighed in on it yet to tell me what you think of him from my case. This is an interesting point. I'm inclined to believe that GK did actually shoot drazerk, it seems unlikely that scum would claim this and then just shout "what now counterclaim me bro". (or if GK is scum, it could've been anyone on the scum team.) From the early damage reports, it seems possible that the scum team was spreading their kp around pretty liberally, and given drazerk's claimed abilities it's possible they put some of it on him if they thought he was sk. Alternatively, it's possible that GK has a vig-ish role and chose town targets that looked scummy to set up a fakeclaim, that wouldn't be surprising. So I really don't see how this claim clears GK. At first I was going to say "it probably means that GK and drazerk aren't scum buddies because then they wouldn't know where that damage came from and they would have to risk a counterclaim," but then I realized that if they are scum buddies it's entirely possible and likely that drazerk just lied about taking that damage. So I don't see how this claim clears anybody. At the moment I have been decently convinced that GK is scum, but I'm going to vote toad because he's claimed scum in the thread and we should kill the scum right in front of us. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 29 2012 22:33 Oatsmaster wrote: Strongandbig, what were your night actions last night? I targeted you with my ability It worked, you should be harder to kill from now on I'd rather not say exactly how my targeting works but I will if I have to | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 30 2012 07:04 Clarity_nl wrote: You have no reason to lie if you actually got healed. But if you are scum you have reason to lie about taking damage. And if you did not take damage you would not get notified about heals, does that make sense? why would scum lie about taking damage | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 30 2012 02:53 Acrofales wrote: Seems easy enough: don't take Dieno, don't take Keirathi. Syllo, Oats, Clarity and Chronicler seems like a pretty good party. Chronicler gets to use his 1-shot ability and if one of the members gets killed, that still leaves 3 townie players who have not mentioned any low HSM shenanigans. Syllo, you agree? Get your party PM ready, and don't you dare herpaderp it up like a certain extinct reptile. ##unvote ##Party Leader Syllo this makes sense don't we want to be spreading out the leadership awards though? I thought we already talked about that. ##vote: clarity for party leader still voting toad for lynch | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 30 2012 07:27 syllogism wrote: Because taking damage is seen towny and they didn't think they could get caught? Why does mafia ever lie? oh I thought you meant he was saying he took less damage than he actually did. Yeah I can see why mafia would lie and say they took extra damage, sure. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 30 2012 07:28 Hapahauli wrote: Clarity. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922¤tpage=251#5017 Read. Reply. That took me way too long to type to put up with this shit. hapa i agree that phagga hasn't done much analysis but i have a different interpretation of his day 1 voting and stuff than you do, I outlined it here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922¤tpage=223#4450 read reply shit-put-up-with etcetera | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
phagga's change on cavejohnson is 100% explainable by finding out that he's drazerk and you still haven't addressed my counter-interpretation of phagga's stance on sandro, i find him perfectly reasonable. i don't agree with your reasoning on hopeless1der, plus you just totally ignored his response to the check on him. and there are very strong arguments made against goodkarma being town as well, which you've totally ignored. like, i know people usually think that "pushing your reads" is a town trait but you're doing it so blindly and ardently that it's basically just derailing the thread. and what happened to your terrible promethelax case, you just dropped it for no reason basically i think you are scum hapahauli - you've got a terrible case, you're pushing it really hard when no one else is really paying attention, and you did the same thing before on promethelax, but you're ignoring other legitimate cases for terrible reasons as well. you're being "involved with the thread" but you're doing it on your own terms only and not towns | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
then he unvoted him when we found out he is drazerk totally logical | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 01 2012 10:34 Acrofales wrote: @SnB I know we have other stuff on our mind right now, but your defense of Phagga is weird. CJ didn't claim Drazerk after the vote and when Phagga changed his mind. He claimed well before. That was NOT the reason for Phagga to change his mind. That said, there were 2 entire cycles (3 if you count when Phagga placed his vote, rather than when he took it off to sheep onto Sandro) between Phagga having a scum read on Drazerk, and Phagga stating his HP to enable Drazerk's ability. That is 96 hours and on estimate 100 pages of thread. Seems like enough time for Phagga to have changed his mind. my bad, i didnt actually look it up, i just assumed. i still disagree with hapa's interpretation of phagga's day 1 behavior and with his conclusion that phagga is scum, and based on the specific (plentiful yet restricted) way hapa's been interacting with the thread, plus my unchanged impressions of his early-game play, i still think he's scum | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 02 2012 00:58 syllogism wrote: Well he claimed using an ability on you and I've an idea what it might have done Strongandbig you might as well claim what it was I increase my target's max hp by 300 and damage them by 250. This ability can fail under certain conditions. On oatsmaster it succeeded. I also claim the 1 hp damage on drazerk, i have a troll ability with 99% chance to do 1 damage and 1% chance to reduce target to 1hp. also voting grab sword and oatsmaster, seems the most reasonable thing atm | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 02 2012 02:50 syllogism wrote: That ability makes no sense and using it makes even less sense. Why did you think using that on Oats was a good idea? It gives +50 net hp and makes them benefit more from other peoples' heals. It doesn't count as a heal itself though, it just raises the max hp without removing any of the damage they've taken or whatever a heal technically counts as. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
acro: why? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 02 2012 03:46 syllogism wrote: Where did you go S&B? What is the condition for your ability to be usable? dota the condition is that i have to know their rolename. it seems counterintuitive to me too to have an ability that rewards town roleclaiming, so i've been thinking it's a trap or there's some kind of scum claim-based ability as well but who knows | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 02 2012 18:34 syllogism wrote: No, risk recruited dieno last cycle and he isn't playing anymore. Presumably he will recruit someone new this cycle. No point discussing things in the QT instead of the thread and there isn't anything to discuss anyway. Hapa and S&B can you two full claim? S&B feels more like a third party to me, but there seem to be so many of those already. If I have to, and it seems like I have to. Honestly, I think my ability is at least partially in the game as a trap for town - we're supposed to all be like "woah we have a pro-town claim-based power let's have vulnerable townies roleclaim," and I think that would make us vulnerable to scum. So I don't like the idea of a mass roleclaim, or at least not of a mass role-name-claim. I am [blue]Nu[/bold]. My main ability is Secrets of the Nu, which is the 250 damage/+300 max hp ability. When I use it I have to target a player and PM greymist their rolename, if im right the ability works, if im not then it fails and i can't use it again the next night. My other ability is Headbutt, which works like I mentioned above (99% chance 1 damage, 1% chance bring target to 1 life). All life begins and ends with me, according to my role pm. My night actions each night:
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 02 2012 21:35 Acrofales wrote: Yeah, I don't see the mafia in Djodref. I will go through his filter again, but I got town last time I checked. I also did some filter diving on SnB. Anybody who says they have a town read based on meta... I don't see it. If I were to compare this to SSM then sure, however I looked over WLIIA and SnB's scumgame has improved a lot since then. I don't find him coming off "more carefree" now than he did there. That said, I don't see where he is pushing a scu agenda this game. He didn't push Sandro's vote D1. He did like a lynch on Sandro early and he has never wanted to be in a party insofar as I can tell. If he is scum, he has played very carefully. However, SnB's most convincing case in WLIIA is on Mementoss, his scumbuddy. So that is not particularly conclusive either. That leaves just the ability. I really want to know what SnB did on the missing nights: N2 and N5. Dieno's flip also indicates that his math is correct. If we subtract 250 damage from N1 and add a 50 HP heal instead, we are left with 145+475 < 750, so he shouldn't have died N4 and need the "mysterious player" to save him from death. i have no good explanation for this, only speculation. however given that my ability is basically a stealth heal, it seems very likely that mafia has similar stealth damage abilities that either work by reducing max hp, canceling healing, or some other mechanism i haven't thought of yet. a poisoner ability is also possible, where someone would die after a delay but wouldn't take damage, so dieno could have been protected from death without being at 1hp. it does seem weird that mafia would use this on frog but maybe they were more concerned with taking him out before he could fix masamune than they were with killing good "traditional mafia" players like syllogism. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 03 2012 00:51 syllogism wrote: Did it ever occur to you to use it on Drazerk? Did it ever occur to you to use your role as a role check? I kind of want to believe you because I don't understand why mafia chose to shoot frog on d1 and then ignored him for 2 days for no apparent reason. It seems likely to me that they shot marvel+dienosore d1, but didn't have enough KP to inflict 665 damage on those two and that they believed some third party also targeted dienosore. i really didn't think of using it as an investigative role, because i wasn't sure what it would gain us to know whether someone was lying about their role name or not. drazerk claimed his role name was "chef" or that he was "a chef" or something like that at first - if i tried to use my ability on him with that, it would fail even if his real role name was "master of the kitchens". plus, i didn't think role name would match up with alignment. promethelax claimed 'zeal plant woman' pretty early on, which i thought was some kind of humanoid plant monster (although it apparently refers to a specific character, i looked it up), and 'nu' (my rolename) are apparently present in the game both as enemies and as friendly third party characters at different time periods. so I thought that by far the best use of my role was to target the "most townie person who roleclaimed" and use my ability to heal them the little bit of hp and (way more importantly, imo) raise the ceiling for how much they could benefit from being healed by other town players. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 03 2012 00:51 syllogism wrote: [snip] It seems likely to me that they shot marvel+dienosore d1, but didn't have enough KP to inflict 665 damage on those two and that they believed some third party also targeted dienosore. that's actually really interesting, i never thought that my ability could be used to confuse mafia about where third party damage is going - maybe they thought i was some kind of anti-town serial killer, or that i was magus and was trying to kill of frog before he got masamune, so they could leave him to me and not keep focus firing him | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
post above the one you quoted i already claimed not sending in an action night two, anyway. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 03 2012 00:59 Oatsmaster wrote: Just saying, I didnt get a heal the whole game also syllo, you should totes claim so you can get the benefit of the 250 visible damage and the 300 invisible raise on your hp i disagree, we have no idea what mafia can do with a name claim but i bet they can do something | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 03 2012 01:00 syllogism wrote: Oh I forgot about the theory of dienosore reflecting some action on d2, perhaps you targeted him again on n2 but it didn't work and that's why you couldn't use it on day 3. That would also explain why you targeted Oats on n3 rather than frog again. Then you got hit by Oats 100 damage and deemed it safer to target prom. This doesn't make you mafia, but I'm just attempting to come up reasons as to why mafia chose their targets as they did. once i use the ability on a player successfully i can't target that player again | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 03 2012 01:01 Acrofales wrote: Also, what made you think that "raising a player's max hp" raised their CURRENT HP? You could raise my max HP out the wazzoo, but unless I also get a heal for a wazzoo amount, it is pointless. Why would your ability be stated in such a weird manner if what it ended up doing was to raise max HP by 300 and current HP by 50? um i've been assuming that the way it's calculated is "current hp = max hp - damage" and that "max hp" and "damage" are the two numbers that the hosts keep track of on their spreadsheet. if my ability doesn't work that way then it's seriously terrible actually, maybe that would make sense as a town ability if the hosts thought there was sure to be a small group of confirmed or semi-confirmed townies who we would focus fire healing on? i still think that would be terrible though, i never even really considered it. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 03 2012 01:08 syllogism wrote: Okay so you haven't even asked the host about it? You just assumed? yeah i was pretty busy in england at first and by the time i got back and had more reliable internet i guess i was just rolling with it anyway i gtg to work now i'll check in on the thread in a couple hours | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 03 2012 01:21 Acrofales wrote: Okay, there is NO way you just assume something as important as that unless you just made that shit up on the spot. SnB is a pretty careful and meticulous player. That is not the kind of thing he just overlooks. Also, with Spekkio being scum, who knows what a Nu is. It is so far the ONLY character claimed that you actually have to fight against in the game.. except for risk.nuke and I completely mistrust risk.nuke too. You have to remember I really wasn't paying much attention at all. Also, I don't always play careful and meticulous. I guess you were not following Mario Mini Mafia at all. Anyway, I sent a PM to greymist asking him how my role works. But it really makes very little sense for it to work the other way, so I'm pretty sure it does the healing thing. On December 03 2012 01:14 Oatsmaster wrote: Wtf is this? You dont think its a town ability already? I had been assuming it worked the first way, that makes perfect sense to me. If it works the second way, I think it's a really weird ability for a townie to have. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
That's pretty unfortunate. I guess instead of a protective role I have some kind of weird gimpy vig shot. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 03 2012 06:28 austinmcc wrote: SnB Leaning scum. Mainly based on the roleclaim, because ... that's the thing I most have to work with. Forget the rolenaming. Forget his other stupid ability that he claimed. He says: (1) SnB says he never asked Grey how this works. Other people seem to be expressing concern that he equated +max HP with "heal" without checking with Grey. Yes, that's questionable. But beyond that...SnB isn't an idiot. If that were actually SnB's ability, he would absolutely have to check with Grey, because...it frigging does 250 damage. The way it's phrased, you can't tell how the parts resolve. Does it do 250 damage to someone, and then, if they're alive, heal them/raise hp? EVEN IF SnB thought +max hp = heal, he has to ask whether he can accidentally kill someone before raising their hp. That's...crazy important. I can believe that he interpreted +max HP to be heal, but I can't believe he wouldn't ask whether both happen at once or whether he basically CPR docs someone if they're under 250 hp. (2) The wording. Grey likes flavor. Grey likes...complex roles that punish gaming the setup (roleclaims, ability claims, whatever). But Grey doesn't create stupid roles. The text of that ability just makes no sense, see (1). If it heals, it should just say "Raise targets max hp 300, heal them for 50." Ta da. It's simple. You can't misinterpret it. Your doc can't kill someone now. Gut feeling, I don't think Grey would create a role that mixed damage/possible heal for no good reason. It's much more likely that SnB has a similar ability, now has to try and find a logical fakeclaim, and so the wording comes out really garbled. Out of his filter...I don't get too much. But he's only been vocal about a couple topics. His posts are generally pretty small, but perk up on three/four topics. The party election D1 Hapahauli (Maybe toad) Phagga There's one big toad post where he votes toad, although from the looks of it toad was caught by a check. So...scumSnB would have had to do that. But he perks up towards the end of the vote D1, and we know that at least one candidate, Sandroba, was scum. So on two of the topics he's been...more wordy about, scum has been involved. I dunno about ALL of SnB's longer posts being about scum, but I could see Hapa or Phagga being scum just based on the way SnB has posted less when scum wasn't concerned. Maybe one a mislynch candidate, one a scumbuddy? I'll give them a look. i already said that i clarified my ability with greymist, it raises someone's max health but does damage to their current health, and raising max health doesn't change current health. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 03 2012 06:35 Clarity_nl wrote: Yeah, in cycle 6 you asked, after prompting by others. yeah that's right it's stupid that it works the way it does Like I said, i was not paying very much attention right at the start of the game, and after that I just rolled with it. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 03 2012 07:31 Acrofales wrote: SnB is scum for claiming an ability that has no town purpose at all. this is a stupid reason to think i'm scum, did you forget rule number one of greymist games? | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 03 2012 07:53 kitaman27 wrote: strongandbig...are you willing to use your role tonight on phagga to confirm he is not golem? yeah okay | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
headbutt drazerk again | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
Guys, think about this for a minute before you do something you'll all regret. Right now you're lynching me because of Syllo's investigation, but you have to admit that I was the obvious target for framing, bus driving, and other anti-investigation roles. Other than that, the main reason for lynching me is that "my role doesn't seem like a normal town role." I agree with that, but that doesn't indicate anything about my alignment - this is a greymist game, that's the kind of thing he delights in. So please, if someone wants to actually make a case on me based around my filter, do so - but maybe if no one can do that you guys will take the hint and figure out that i'm town. On December 03 2012 16:59 Promethelax wrote: good point. SnB, anything else you wanna claim about your ability? Besides the fact that you attacked me with it like an idiot. Let me be clear, without any other aspect of your claim to explain what is happening to your targets I will vote you. I thought I was healing you. We've been over this already. I admit I failed when I didn't figure out how my role actually works, but I never have told you anything but the truth. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 29 2012 22:12 strongandbig wrote: I decided to put this in a separate post, it's my take on the goodkarma case that promethelax put out. I think goodkarma definitely is the right person to be scrutinizing right now given how the party turned out. Since acro and keir were in the party, its failure doesn't automatically make goodkarma scum; but it should put him right under the microscope. this is a pretty good summary, the case is good even without taking the mission failure into account. I don't like GK's response to a few points in the case. I'm not going to quote the whole back-and-forth here, because I really don't have time to dig through the quote nesting. I'll just post what I don't like about the response:
On the other hand, I don't think the phagga association thing is a big deal even if GK is scum, I could see a scum easily doing that with a townie (since they know their read will be right). This is an interesting point. I'm inclined to believe that GK did actually shoot drazerk, it seems unlikely that scum would claim this and then just shout "what now counterclaim me bro". (or if GK is scum, it could've been anyone on the scum team.) From the early damage reports, it seems possible that the scum team was spreading their kp around pretty liberally, and given drazerk's claimed abilities it's possible they put some of it on him if they thought he was sk. Alternatively, it's possible that GK has a vig-ish role and chose town targets that looked scummy to set up a fakeclaim, that wouldn't be surprising. So I really don't see how this claim clears GK. At first I was going to say "it probably means that GK and drazerk aren't scum buddies because then they wouldn't know where that damage came from and they would have to risk a counterclaim," but then I realized that if they are scum buddies it's entirely possible and likely that drazerk just lied about taking that damage. So I don't see how this claim clears anybody. At the moment I have been decently convinced that GK is scum, but I'm going to vote toad because he's claimed scum in the thread and we should kill the scum right in front of us. I think the best bet for actually killing scum today is to kill goodkarma. Unlike me, there actually is a real case on him, and it's one that hasn't been answered to anything near my satisfaction. So ##vote: goodkarma | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 04 2012 04:14 Keirathi wrote: How many bus drivers do you think scum has? And if it was a town role, why did they use it on phagga, whom s&b said he was going to target at syllo's (?) request? And if it was a townie, why haven't they claimed it? the "frame bus" was much more like a framer than a bus driver, it's quite possible they have that and also a real bus driver And i don't think they used it on phagga, I think they used it on me - so one of them, who was going to shoot djodref, actually got roleblocked+tracked by syllogism | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 04 2012 03:28 Clarity_nl wrote: You see, it's not just that your ability doesn't seem townlike, it's the way you've handled the use of your ability AND the fact that you "didn't care that much" about confirming your assumptions when it came to your abilities. Even ignoring all of that you have been practically useless all game, didn't bother telling us you were going to be away for a couple of days until you were LITERALLY AT THE AIRPORT and a lackluster defense of any accusation thrown at you. I'll admit, my play this game has been terrible, and I'm sorry for it. I shouldn't have joined the game when I was going to be gone, but in my own defense there was no way to know that this would be the single most active game in TL mafia history. It's just practically impossible to even keep up, much less to seriously contribute. But scummy? How do any of the things you said push a scum agenda or distinguish between "scum" and "bad town player"? Once I got used to thinking of my ability in a certain way, it didn't occur to me to question it later on when I could actually take some time to think about the game. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 04 2012 04:21 iamperfection wrote: s&b i think you should do one of those list posts with your thoughts on all the players in the game. do those ever actually help? i can if you really think it would help, but usually all those things do is make the person posting them look like a scum desperate to put together something that looks like a contribution | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
##epoch 1999 Lets get this shit over with yo Both of these things are gonna happen eventually might as well do them now | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
It's not his fault | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 05 2012 06:52 Promethelax wrote: I like Draz. When he decides to participate he often has great ideas. Gems in the rough. However, Draz, you aren't actually giving me anything to work with. I still want to know who you think is scum. you forget drazerk doesn't try to find scum it's just not how he plays mafia OH WAIT | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On December 05 2012 06:55 CaveJohnson wrote: Just stop posting SnB you attacking me is null either way so it won't work. lol IM SO NULL RIGHT NOW GUIZ | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
BL DHF TOWN BWAHAHAA | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
the reason it was so hard for us to kill people this game was that (1) there were incentives to spread out our damage, stuff like my roleshot and people deciding to use their night actions to build up shitty alibies rather than just do damage to our main targets. (2) people were choosing their individual actions rather than coordinating as a team. I've learned a big lesson here for if I'm scum again in a heavily themed game, you have to have a plan. (3) to go along with (2), several of the team members were either uninvested or discombobulated and confused by how massive the thread was. Sandro, toad, REDACTED, biosc, and myself all fell into this category. I don't know what reasons REDACTED and biosc had for replacing, and toad was confirmed scum pretty early on and just kind of had to sit there and wait to be lynched, so their dis-investment is understandable. But the scum team really had zero players who were able to keep up with the thread. (4) there were some blatantly confusing decisions made on targets. For example, I still am unsure why we focus fired Marv, when his power was pretty useless, he wasn't pushing any cases on any of us, and he was like the strongest advocate of me being town. It ended up not mattering since I got lynched based on sandro's night action result rather than the case against me, but I think we should have focus fired Syllo instead. Another confusing decision is why we decided to focus so much KP on djodref. The thing about those decisions is, they weren't discussed and decided based on a strategy so much as they were just the results of someone at the last minute being 'oh shit i have to send in night actions'. The scum team really needed someone to coordinate them, but our strongest scum player (imo) (Toad) was confirmed scum by dt checks super early. Sandro was too wrapped up in how bad he is at playing scum and how well syllogism can read him to actually try to do anything, he just psyched himself out and then gave up. BioSC and REDACTED are both pretty inexperienced, and both replaced out. REDACTED and REDACTED both have more experience playing scum than I do (I think - could be wrong here) but they're normally pretty low-profile players anyway; but they were probably the most engaged of the whole scum team, props to them, but they didn't really do anything in the way of leadership. And if I really could focus on the game I would have been able to at least try to organize a team strategy (or at least, I'd like to think so), but I was planning on catching up to the game when I got back from England and it just got so big that could never make headway. Having VE replace in for biosc gave me hope that he would pull us together, but that just didn't happen and instead he just stopped playing for whatever reason. So yeah, there's absolutely no way to blame mechanics or luck. The blame for losing this hard should go squarely at the feet of the mafia team, and of the town's ridiculous horrible super activity. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
The massive difference in shit-giving between when some players are scum versus town is kind of a problem. It's like, sacrificing one half of your game to make the other half better. Even if you enjoy one side more, it's just, like, disrespectful to your teammates. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
| ||