| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On November 21 2012 13:24 Z-BosoN wrote: Lavos appears at a predetermined time we can't control OR when all mafia are dead. We want mafia dead. I only saw the town win con as Town: Defeat Lavos. So yeah.. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
sorry. Also about the Keir thing with marv. He said that if he did think marv was scum he wouldnt vote him Then he said that he would have to be sure that marv was town to vote him. They are the same in my opinion, Keir has the confidence that he will either have a town or scum read on marv by the end of the day, not a null read | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Also I am against roleclaims of any kind. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
My point is that scum fakeclaiming could hurt us more in the party system than in the normal lynch system. Anyway since no one is considering it, I am happy :D | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Get off your ass and start playing properly. Its does not help anyone when you keep making fluff posts and pissing people off | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I am waiting for tommorrow/later today to propose a leader. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
it could go badly if we blindly believe him What I meant to say was that with his limited contribution in the thread so far, it is difficult to know whether he is scum or town, even though he allegedly is an awesome town player and an obvious mafia player. BUT its too hard to tell RIGHT NOW. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
so What's your current read on sandroba? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Sandro's idea doesnt really make that much sense now with new info. I dont see how you can confirm new players when you either succeed or fail based on hidden point values. I think that the best way of choosing a leader is someone who is experienced enough to make accurate reads and for that leader to choose the 3 highest town reads with him. I think that this is the best tactic FOR NOW | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Does scum have to send in actions before they know who the party leader is? or after the whole party is made? I think you misunderstand me. My point is that we should focus on completing the tasks since that is the only way town gets an advantage. The best way to complete the tasks is the send the 4 towniest players | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
What's your current read on Sandroba? Since you are still here... Hopefully... | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Do you have a strategy on picking the party leaders/party members? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
So what do you propose we do to pick the party members. In my opinion, town's goal is to COMPLETE the first task. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Also with the HP system, I think it is difficult for anyone to die from night actions after cycle 1. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
There is no point putting mostly arbitrary percentage values on the 'amount' of scumminess. Use quotes to substantiate your points. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
It is a really bad idea to keep the information to yourself... You should try to help town as much as possible and that includes giving us as much information as possible!! @Clarity I am building a case on you at the moment, keep your eyes open! | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
He justs posts 1-line comments throughout the whole chronicler incident.. the activity makes people think he is town but he doesnt actually take a stand, just criticized chronicler. On November 21 2012 12:31 Clarity_nl wrote: Because you're throwing a second layer of wifom into the mix. Agrees with Hapa, and basically repeats what he and everyone else before said to sound like he is contributing. On November 21 2012 12:44 Clarity_nl wrote: Quantity of information does not equal quality of information. Moving on... I agree with hapa that the person we vote for has to be clear town, but not newbie town as they need to be strong analytically. Then with the Dienosore stuff, he again posts 1 liner’s criticizing deinosore.. On November 21 2012 13:55 Clarity_nl wrote: There is a special place in hell for people like you. The last post with the Diensore actually being stupid, Clarity is asking for advice from town, no willing to take a stand on his own. On November 21 2012 18:20 Clarity_nl wrote: They..... use certain verb tenses and pronoun connotations.....Asking questions a scumlord would ask? Can someone please give me a read on Dieno or tell me I should ignore him, I really want to move on from him but every time I think his idiocy stopped it returns with renewed ego. Keeps tunneling Diensore, an obvious target long after people stopped caring. Tunneling Djo on a minor issue about his assumptions. On November 21 2012 22:19 Clarity_nl wrote: Why did you work under the assumption that party members chosen would not be disclosed. Seems rather counter-intuitive to me. On November 21 2012 22:28 Clarity_nl wrote: I understand wanting to make sure, who wouldn't, but before the mod shared that info you were working under the assumption that party members chosen would not be disclosed, right? THIS IS WHY I THINK THAT CLARITY IS SCUM | ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
|
|
|
The Patches Monday
Afreeca Starleague
Sharp vs Shinee
Action vs Shine
GSL
PiGosaur Cup
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
BeSt vs Paralyze
Jaedong vs Speed
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
