EPTChrono Trigger Mafia - Page 193
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
I didn't get roleblocked, I didn't take any damage... Regarding the reward, I think we should wait Oats to confirm us that he got a reward before we start speculating too much  | ||
|
TheChronicler
Macedonia260 Posts
Keir, does your role have anything special when you're leader? Don't answer this. Clarity hasn't claimed anything to do with being a party member. I think Keir should be our leader because it's possible he gets something out of it. We won day 1, just use the same team. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
| ||
|
TheChronicler
Macedonia260 Posts
| ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On November 27 2012 09:41 Keirathi wrote: Wat...? It says ANY party that I'm in has a lower chance of success. That's pretty straight forward wording, and I (not should anyone else) have any reason to believe that it didn't apply day 1 for some unknown reason. So let's say (hypothetically) bringing you night one took us from 100% to 70% success rate, but you succeeded. But it could have been something like from 100% success rate to 10% to but you succeeded. Same outcome, but very different likelihoods of success... We can continue to speculate on this, but it just doesn't make sense to me why we should bring you today since we don't know that we'll have the same outcome this time around as last time with you in the party. | ||
|
TheChronicler
Macedonia260 Posts
On November 27 2012 09:47 goodkarma wrote: So let's say (hypothetically) bringing you night one took us from 100% to 70% success rate, but you succeeded. But it could have been something like from 100% success rate to 10% to but you succeeded. Same outcome, but very different likelihoods of success... We can continue to speculate on this, but it just doesn't make sense to me why we should bring you today since we don't know that we'll have the same outcome this time around as last time with you in the party. If we don't bring him today we're just going to be bringing him next time when we have to bring in someone who hasn't been a part of the teams. We want the highest modifier we can get when that happens. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On November 27 2012 09:46 Promethelax wrote: GK, fair enough. I think it is time our viggies got aimed at scum instead of lurkers. We don't know we'll get a lynch we do know that Toad is scum. No we dont. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17976 Posts
On November 27 2012 09:32 Hopeless1der wrote: TC has claimed Acro and I are opposite alignments. AT LEAST one of them is scum to me. I think its more likely to be Acro. I know we don't want to lose the event and that I'm probably considered more likely to be scum than TC or Acro, but I'd like to be on the party for the sake of "proving" I'm town. Dafuq? Like seriously. DAFUQ? I cannot get my head around how mindblowingly stupid this post is. 1. OPPOSITE alignment. Unless you have reason to believe there are 2 scumteams, that means 1 of us is town, the other scum OR 1 of us is town, the other 3rd party, OR 1 of us is scum and the other 3rd party. It *might* be possible for 2 third parties to be considered "opposite alignment". No clue on the specifics there. So no, there is AT MOST 1 scum between you and me. For the record, that scum is you. 2. You think? Really? I KNOW I'm not scum. I don't have to "think that it may perhaps be slightly more likely that I am not scum", because I fucking know it. This overly cautious phrasing is you claiming scum, because you cannot figure out a town mindset. 3. Yeah, trolololol. Lets fail the event, because Hopeless1derp wants to "prove" he's town. Once again, thinking like a townie? Failed. Miserably I might add. Verdict: scum PS. The failure to think like a townie is what I caught this guy on in Acme, so it even fits his meta. | ||
|
TheChronicler
Macedonia260 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17976 Posts
On November 27 2012 09:38 TheChronicler wrote: No. Winning the event is more important than your "proving" you're town. This reads as scum trying to get on the team to make us fail the event as a last ditch effort. We don't even have a lynch today, and Toad would be the lynch over you regardless. Acro could easily have been bussing Toad after seeing my check. I STILL can't wrap my head around why he would claim in thread. What scum would do something like that, though? If I was bussing Toad, I was doing so way before your check. | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
Oh well. @ Hopeless Curious - did Toad end up healing you? | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On November 27 2012 09:47 goodkarma wrote: So let's say (hypothetically) bringing you night one took us from 100% to 70% success rate, but you succeeded. But it could have been something like from 100% success rate to 10% to but you succeeded. Same outcome, but very different likelihoods of success... We can continue to speculate on this, but it just doesn't make sense to me why we should bring you today since we don't know that we'll have the same outcome this time around as last time with you in the party. I'm pretty sure that the chance of party success isn't some % value roll of the dice. From OP: Town players will assist completion of an event and mafia players will count against. There are other hidden factors that contribute to this as well. Again, I think its much more likely that we're using some kind of zero-sum system for sucess values. Some people are high, some people are low, most people are in the middle, and mafia are negative. Then everyone in the party's value is added up, and if the sum is >0, then the party is successful. Some random roll of the dice would be insanely dumb, and I don't think GreyMisT is dumb. | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
Lastly, it looks like lynches aren't every other cycle. We need to think about focus-firing players as a town and/or using damage abilities that we have available. | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17976 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On November 27 2012 09:52 Hapahauli wrote: Grawefakwjehfk I want to lynch someone T_T Oh well. @ Hopeless Curious - did Toad end up healing you? No record of a heal. I took 75 damage. I think I was healed, but the amount doesn't match Toad's claim. | ||
|
Dienosore
Brunei Darussalam622 Posts
On November 27 2012 09:03 Mementoss wrote: ...and the cutie pie Deinosore. But Dienosore had a plan to make the hovercraft go faster! He pulled some pretty pink ribbons out of his pocket and attached them to the back end. However, this did not do anything except make the party look fabulous. teehee “Marvellosity, I am so sick of you! GL HF”, shouted Clarity_Nl, as he pushed him out of the moving hovercraft. “ We will come back for you, espeically if we owe GMarshal 1000G!” Marvellosity - King Guardia XXI! has been killed! wtf clarity, y u do that | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On November 27 2012 09:49 Acrofales wrote: Dafuq? Like seriously. DAFUQ? I cannot get my head around how mindblowingly stupid this post is. 1. OPPOSITE alignment. Unless you have reason to believe there are 2 scumteams, that means 1 of us is town, the other scum OR 1 of us is town, the other 3rd party, OR 1 of us is scum and the other 3rd party. It *might* be possible for 2 third parties to be considered "opposite alignment". No clue on the specifics there. So no, there is AT MOST 1 scum between you and me. For the record, that scum is you. 2. You think? Really? I KNOW I'm not scum. I don't have to "think that it may perhaps be slightly more likely that I am not scum", because I fucking know it. This overly cautious phrasing is you claiming scum, because you cannot figure out a town mindset. 3. Yeah, trolololol. Lets fail the event, because Hopeless1derp wants to "prove" he's town. Once again, thinking like a townie? Failed. Miserably I might add. Verdict: scum PS. The failure to think like a townie is what I caught this guy on in Acme, so it even fits his meta. I know I'm town. I'm only proving it to the rest of you. You're a dead man upon my flip, as I'm sure you're aware. | ||
| ||
