EPTI say just shoot into mkmkmk if he does not come back before deadline and be done with him.
TL Mafia LVI - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
I say just shoot into mkmkmk if he does not come back before deadline and be done with him. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
Well looks like it is going to be a mkmkmk lynch. To me it seems like we sadly have a large amount of players not really actively playing/contributing at all. (e.g. foxtrot, drwiggles, casualman), which makes a clear lynchtarget pretty hard to get since our scummy lurker category is way too big. A lynch on mkmkmk is okayish I guess, from the bunch of not-contirbuting lurkers his switch in attitude stands out as pointed out by ET. Still I think we would be better off lynching BKE. The lynch on one of the lurkers is pretty much a gamble in my opinion as they could just as well be desinterested/busy townies.If you look closely at BKE you will quite easily see something missing from his filter: Scumhunting Since he got called out he has done close to 0 contribution. All the time just posting tidbits on the people who voted him. No scumhunting and layabout already phrased that correctly: On July 02 2012 06:51 layabout wrote: If you read through Broodking's post's you may notice that he is not very concerned about who we lynch so long as it isn't him. He keeps jumping into argument's and telling us not to kill him rather than telling us what he thinks about other players. He put more effort into telling us he isn't a noob than he put into his vote. I already told him to well start contributing and sharing reads but nothing there. No chance to make a switch happen onto him? | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
It is okay with me, but I prefer a lynch on BKE, so sorry won''t switch. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On July 02 2012 09:03 Vivax wrote: Shiao, I'll just let you know that I don't like your posts. Whatever you do,I'll be watching. Well good to know I guess? | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
nice flavor post though. Off to bed | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
@Acrofales: Your case on Vivax does have merit, but sadly I would say that he is town. I played with him two newbie games, one in which he was scum and one in which he was town. His play here is pretty much a "logical" fit of his townplay. (look at NMM XV, where I more or less led his mislynch). his scum play is much more cautious and lurky than what he is doing right now (NMM XVI for reference). I am by no means happy about his playstyle but it looks town. @Mandalor: I actually think we should wait for the nighthit and some discussion before agreeing on a lynch for d2. It gives more information we can work on. And I do not like the idea of flipping yet another coin with a lurker lynch (which is most of Mattchews list). @drwiggles: You are making no sense at all. Seriously what the hell have you been doing the whole day cycle? You had only 3 posts, which accumalte to zero content and a badly explained vote on the bandwagon that was at the time on BKE. Now come night you just burst in and throw suspicion on the people who have contributed. If you disliked the lynch on fox why didn't you say so and actively tried to prevent it? Oh wait, you were actively lurking.... Also your fixation on lynching mattchew for "information" is really unsettling, goal of the game is to lynch scum... There are a lot of logical gaps in your posts and the whole matter of coming in after the lynch and just gunning for someone is something I really dislike. FoS: drwiggl3s @casualman On July 02 2012 18:38 casualman wrote: I propose no talking during the night Like seriously? Stop trolling and do something for a change. @Vivax: I do not agree on your read on marv, sure he led a mislynch, but being wrong is no scumtrait. Also the way it unfolded marv looked really town just go and check his filter. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
Now onto mattchew. His list generated discussion for town, which is good and also neatly piled up all the "scummy lurkers", which was a good thing. Why are you so intent on lynching for information? Mattchews line about "deserving" I interpreted as simply one lurker down, if he had been interested in this game he might have defended himself? A mislynch on a townie is bad but foxtrot did nothing that helped town, so it is kind of "deserving" as anti-town play is especially play we want to make out and eliminate, so to me there is nothing wrong with that quote. Your conclusion that if mattchew dies all ppl on the list are town is just wrong. Bussing has always happened and will always continue to happen. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On July 02 2012 19:44 Hyaach wrote: hi guys catching up on thread. seems FT lynch didnt turn out so well. Why did you ninjavote him? | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On July 02 2012 19:50 Vivax wrote: 'Being wrong is no scumtrait'. What kind of generalization is that. There were no good objective reasons to kill foxtrotter, and I kept asking marv about his reasons. He wasn't just wrong with his bad 'read', he also openly refused to justify his case by insulting me whenever I asked him something. And I'm writing this to town players, not to ShiaoPi. It is a generalization, which I learned by myself for being wrong (remember heist in NMM XVI?). Read this: On July 02 2012 07:42 marvellosity wrote: Because I love myself so much, I'm quoting myself. Can we make a Foxtrotter lynch happen? The post really screams newbie scum MO all over it. Apologising for absence, and then the excuses for voting mkmkmk - calls him a lurker basically "everything mK has done (or lack of)" despite doing even less himself. Then posts a random post of mk's like this is damning evidence. Everything about it feels like it's a scumbie who feels they have to post and doing so by appearing to try to contribute. But the whole post is actually devoid of anything. ##Vote: Foxtrotter And tell me that is "no reason" to lynch somebody, and if you cba to read marv, I'll put it shortly: -lurking -calling out a lurker and voting him, while doing nothing else himself -simple sheeping | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
All of you claiming the lynch on foxtrotter was that bad, why didn't you show some more activity to prevent it them? | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On July 02 2012 20:04 Hyaach wrote: I wanted BKE to contribute before i slept. When i came back, it was 7.30 am i had to rush off. I glanced the thread and saw people i have town read on are actually wishy washy about BKE lynch. My vote on mKmK was a pressure vote and there was zero response. So i took the best way out, lynch the next proposed target. okay, now that you have caught up on the thread what are your scumreads? | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
Please please improve your reading comprehension @marv: One at least has to try  | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On July 02 2012 20:12 Vivax wrote: Don't even know why I reply to someone who I believe to be scum. Go ahead and make your case then | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
my read on wiggles is a slightly scummy one right now. d1 I had him under scummy/nulltell lurker his nightposts have been confusing and outright wrong partly. I also do not think he is playing his first game, not sure if that makes him scummier. Your point about him reading but not wanting to respond to your case is quite telling though, so I would just keep my Fos on him right now. Hyaach is somebody we should also keep a good eye on, he is lurking and not contributing anything at all. But could be just his playstyle, judging from the one I played with him. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On July 03 2012 00:54 layabout wrote: ##shoot layabout dafuq?! | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
Any reason for going batshit layabout? | ||
| ||
