|
On June 02 2012 04:43 wherebugsgo wrote:
I've been asleep. (and I just lost what I was posting from my phone)
I agree with Radfield that Kurumi's aggressiveness based on that singular point is strange and makes him less likely to be mafia. However the meta still agrees, even with the game Kurumi linked. In the beginning of Space Station you can see the tone of Kurumi's posts is much more laid back than here.
I disagree with a Sbrubbles lynch for now because I think the way he has discussed things is not scummy.
His tone seems more like a townie talking about setup mechanics than a scum.
Navillus looks pretty bad, given that he seems to have no opinions of his own regarding the lynch. Toad I'm a bit unsure of as he's posted more.
Of these players I think a Navillus lynch might be the most productive and likely to flip a scum.
##unvote
##vote Navillus
Storm Mafia
if you want to make your meta argument sound at least a little believable present evidence, thanks
|
I will soon reread the thread. I can lay my pitchfork for now.
|
On June 02 2012 05:42 prplhz wrote:
Read his town games, read his day0 play this game, first time scum mostly try not to stick out and he absolutely knows how to do this better than this. He is sticking out very much with his two measly posts and I very much doubt any scum would think that this would ever be enough not to get lynched. I expect him to get back and tell us why he's been playing so horribly on day1 but I don't think that he's scum right now.
I'm not saying he's new, I'm saying he's first time scum.
Lol.
Your argument is "he is too bad to be scum" right?
|
Risk.nuke lynch looks really good.
a) he has not contributed anything so far
b) he "agrees" with me very fast without saying why
c) he gets off Radfield after a while without saying why
d) his last post says he wants to kill one of three guys, this is quite opportunistic
e) his fist post is the only one which looks like it has taken him more than a minute to write
he looks a little like an active lurker. I usually don't like lurker lynches but we're playing a mini so I am up for lynching risk.nuke.
|
|
|
sloOsh looks good for me, it's weird that he asks more than posts more himself, but oh well.
Zephirdd is... weird. Doesn't do things himself, changes his opinions, posts a lot of fluff like "go vote" "here's case by Kurumi (without his comment of course) and this is something that makes me uneasy
On June 01 2012 10:36 Zephirdd wrote:
Hm, looking at Holy Roman, Kurumi seems to be much more careful on this game(ie. serious). Like wbg said, (if we take Holy Roman as Kurumi's town meta) his town meta is to troll. Anyone has more town games from Kurumi to analyze, and possibly scum games as well?
I also retract any "accusation" I may have had about Radfield. He seems clean enough for me atm.
Why are you guys not posting more? I hate lynching lurkers.
I don't hate lynching lurkers... Never(I just think that there are a lot better options that's why I try to fight against doing it in normal-sized games). As Town, I see them as a valid scum candidates and as scum I see a freebie. Are you scared of something, Zephirdd?
|
On June 02 2012 06:35 Zephirdd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2012 06:08 Kurumi wrote:sloOsh looks good for me, it's weird that he asks more than posts more himself, but oh well. Zephirdd is... weird. Doesn't do things himself, changes his opinions, posts a lot of fluff like "go vote" "here's case by Kurumi (without his comment of course) and this is something that makes me uneasy On June 01 2012 10:36 Zephirdd wrote:
Hm, looking at Holy Roman, Kurumi seems to be much more careful on this game(ie. serious). Like wbg said, (if we take Holy Roman as Kurumi's town meta) his town meta is to troll. Anyone has more town games from Kurumi to analyze, and possibly scum games as well?
I also retract any "accusation" I may have had about Radfield. He seems clean enough for me atm.
Why are you guys not posting more? I hate lynching lurkers. I don't hate lynching lurkers... Never(I just think that there are a lot better options that's why I try to fight against doing it in normal-sized games). As Town, I see them as a valid scum candidates and as scum I see a freebie. Are you scared of something, Zephirdd? I hate people not playing. Lynching Lurkers is lynching people for not playing. Kurumi, what happened with your "I still think Radfield is scum"? Did you, *ahem* CHANGE YOUR OPINION? If so, then you have no reason to vote me. If not, then why are you NOT pushing him? Saw an easy candidate and jumped on him?
As I said, I laid my pitchfork down, not put my mind away for a while. I still find Radfield suspicious. Yes, I would lynch him if I would, but there's no chance for it now. Besides, I was quite focused on him (call it tunneling, whatever) till pretty much now and I looked at other people. You don't look good. Active lurking, really aggressive after getting called out...
You were buddying to me earlier man, what happened? You should lynch yourself man!
|
EWODP:
I would lynch him if could
|
On June 02 2012 07:01 Radfield wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2012 06:58 prplhz wrote:On June 02 2012 06:50 Zephirdd wrote:
@prplhz because it's possible I will be away during the deadline and I don't want to be without a vote. I weighted what I know so far and I thought HiroPiro would be the vote I want to have at the deadline.
Also, don't use the "that's not something mafia would do" reasoning. I've learned that from my last few games. I'm not going to use it forever, but right now it looks like something mafia wont do so I don't want to lynch him today. If he continues to do weird stuff that could be interpreted as scummy, then I'm going to put more focus on him. You are saying that someone put an argument out there that scum would do this and that, and then when somebody does exactly this, you say that he's scum? That seems too weird that scum would put themselves in a position like this unless there was a huge gain, what huge gain do you think this is? I'm now going to postulate that HiroPro isn't scum and that scum voted 2-1. Why do you think that's not likely? The vote was going to be split anyway and there were tons of people who didn't even encrypt so we can't verify what they did, HiroPro not only encrypted his vote and voted very early, he decided to vote for something that people had already said would be scummy. Even though scum would have something to gain by doing it, they would also have a lot to lose and they would know this. What do you think about Sbrubbles and Navilus? That's actually a pretty decent point. After filtering him, Sbrubbles looks alright for the moment. Navilus I haven't looked at.
What about risk.nuke? He is playing like he is not.
|
On June 02 2012 07:24 risk.nuke wrote:
I've been away. I apologise for those of you who care about apologies. My time have disappeared before me and I haven't put down almost anything into this game YET.
Vote: Zephirdd
And hey, wbg thinks I'm scum so you should consider me confirmed townie.
does that mean you think wbg is scum?
|
You can't even go to bed in those games.
I find Toad staying up to 3am suspicious
You went for a candidate who was the least discussed during the day.
You went for THE WORST CANDIDATE.
This is absolutely terrible. You all followed one person, what are you, lemmings?
Why do I always need to cleanup myself.
|
prplhz is scum by the way and he should be dead by the morning, he never had a solid candidate for a lynch D1 and changed his opinion every 2 hours or so. "But people can change their opinions blablablablalI" HE NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT ZEPHIRDD. I am voting for lynch lock, mayor might be acceptable too, even majority.
FoS Toadesstern for staying suspiciously long, like waiting for something
My suspicion of Radfield is still alive, him making the swing and empty posts like "This post looks genuine and townish" are NOTHING. They are just adjectives thrown at people without any support. Maybe I will get rid of him because it is more likely he holds the role.
|
Risk.nuke damn man please step up your game
|
On June 02 2012 20:35 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2012 19:35 Kurumi wrote:
You can't even go to bed in those games.
I find Toad staying up to 3am suspicious
You went for a candidate who was the least discussed during the day.
You went for THE WORST CANDIDATE.
This is absolutely terrible. You all followed one person, what are you, lemmings?
Why do I always need to cleanup myself. I had to stay up until 1am anyways for the deadline of the game I'm hosting and the deadline in greymists game. Not to mention I usually stay up until 3am reading Game of thrones anyways on weekends because I'm happy I don't have to wake up on 8am. About the votes getting track so fast: 1) It was a pain in the ass to get people vote someone. I'd definitely not say it went fast lol 2) What about the secret vote mafia had? We had 8 people on the guy, we had a secret vote that was, from the looks of it not used or invisible. The point here is that mafia did not have to secure a lynch given we only needed 6 to lynch instead of 7 and them having a secret vote. That makes analysis a bit tricky because mafia could as well have just put the secret vote on that guy and not voted him. That's all I've got to say for now. There's 2 people who are looking awful right now and I'm going to say something about them once I'm back.
Okay. I understand.
|
Zephirdd did not even defend himself and even soft defended Radfield for no reason. Why talk about Radfield being less active while you are not Radfield yourself?
What the heck happened guys...
Navillus pretty much did not have time to defend himself and he was also right. Zephirdd is playing a defensive game for no reason. Zephirdd is scared which I pointed out earlier.
Zephirdd-Radfield-prplhz
which one should die today and tomorrow guys?
|
On June 02 2012 22:29 prplhz wrote:
I don't think it's all that likely that there is a vigilante, but if there is and he shoots me on Kurumi's "case" then he needs to get his brain examined. I don't know why Kurumi is acting like it's 100% sure that there is a vigilante but it could just be a crazy Kurumi plan.
It's not crazy when I've got a gun
|
On June 02 2012 23:30 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2012 22:54 Kurumi wrote:On June 02 2012 22:29 prplhz wrote:
I don't think it's all that likely that there is a vigilante, but if there is and he shoots me on Kurumi's "case" then he needs to get his brain examined. I don't know why Kurumi is acting like it's 100% sure that there is a vigilante but it could just be a crazy Kurumi plan. It's not crazy when I've got a gun Ah, so you don't have a gun then.
Ciryandor hoped that was true one time...
|
Also I find it interesting that you don't ask
"Why do you want to shoot me?"
Waiiiiiit... do you want to say you're mafia and you did not pick vigilante and you feel cocky because you're going to be alive?
|
On June 03 2012 00:35 Toadesstern wrote:
Okay back and I know I promised I would talk about who those 2 guys are I mentioned and why they are mafia but I realized I was retarded when I said that. See you d2 :p
what the heck?
|
Jeez, "throw shit"? What the heck? Call it stupid accusations, fosing for no reason but please don't call it throwing shit, man.
I've decided. Prplhz won't wake up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
