|
On February 29 2012 08:09 ghost_403 wrote: @phagga Why did you do that. Now we have to listen to him pass off other peoples arguments as his own for the next few days.
Lol, that made me laugh. Well, yeah... I did not think about it that way 
|
On February 29 2012 08:14 Chocolate wrote:Show nested quote +On February 29 2012 08:09 ghost_403 wrote:@phagga Why did you do that. Now we have to listen to him pass off other peoples arguments as his own for the next few days. This post brings nothing new to the thread. Not impressed. Yeah he didn't ask anything new. Then why did you post it?
|
On February 29 2012 08:30 Chocolate wrote: Because you were asking me to... I didn't want to ignore it, but I didn't want to link you my old posts because that would imply that you didn't read them. Hopefully consolidating them in one place will help.
Ok, I think we are talking about 2 different things here...
ghost_403 linked this post and said there was nothing new in it. When you then answered with "yeah, I know", I thought you meant the same post. But now I think you did not? Because I can't find a post where anyone has asked you to reply to Alderans Post.
On February 29 2012 08:30 TestSubject893 wrote: Sorry if this is a really newbie question, but what should we be trying to accomplish during this night phase? I want to contribute, but I feel a bit directionless right now. I feel like I should be making a case, but I can't come up with a lot that's conclusive. Is it just a waiting game until we see the results of the night actions and then work from there?
IMO there is not to much pressure to actually contribute a lot through the night. I just had a few thoughts I wanted to get rid off, which is why I posted several things. I guess the main activity will be during the 48 hours of day.
I'm off to bed now. Hopefully see you in the morning of day 2.
|
We have no idea what the motives of the mafia are. We can only speculate. And if we speculate wrong, we might start hunting and lynching people for the wrong reasons, we will get WIFOM, it will create more uncertainty than facts. The only ones profiting from it will be the mafia.
There is no benefit in guessing what the mafia is up to. Also, it does not matter. Whatever the mafia wanted to achieve, we just need to make sure that we can lynch them, then we win.
Also, the way you questioned zelblade looked heavily like rolefishing, so stop it. We only risk that towns (green and blue) accidentally slip information about their role, and that benefits mafia as well. Our focus must be in finding out who is red, not who is green and blue.
The roleblock on zelblade does not help us at the moment. It may be useful later when we have more information on everything. But for now, it opens two possibilities: - zelblade got roleblocked. That would make him pretty much confirmed town. - Zelblade is mafia, mafia did not use their roleblock, and zelblade pretends to have been roleblocked to look confirmed town. That would make him confirmed scum.
We cannot know which one of the above is true at this time. So please, let's drop this topic and try to find scum instead.
|
@Gumshoe:
1. Zelblade just dropped the info. You then started pushing for more information on his role, for his thoughts on the roleblock etc. (writing from mobile, too lazy to look it up). He tried to drop the topic, you pushed on. If someone is making a spectacle, it's you.
2. If mafia thought he was doc, they would have shot him or will do so soon.
3. The info he gave us might be useful in the future.
|
This reminds me that I completely forgot to vote on him, as I said I would during the Night.
##vote Chocolate
Also, gumshoe, that was pathetic. Your next.
|
To k2hd:
+ Show Spoiler +On March 01 2012 19:39 k2hd wrote:I believe that chocolate is town. He's had a LOT of pressure put on him due to his sub-par posting on day 1, and had to defend himself left, right and centre for the rest of day 1. He's spent most of his time on defensive posts, and perhaps hasn't been able to focus on gathering much of his own evidence on other players. He is very aggressive in trying to force lurkers to post more by voting, but as was mentioned by DYH, this could just have been a poorly thought out way of fostering discussion. I understand that it may have been an easy way to avoid generating original content/cases of his own, but again, this is probably just the play style of a townie who is unsure of what to do, or who would rather not stick his head out too much. I did not check up on everyone's previous games, but from what I gather from what others have said, chocolate was mafia in his last game, had to tone down his posting because it was too aggressive, and hasn't played town before (unless he's had another game that I don't know about). There is also this post by chocolate: Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 11:26 Chocolate wrote: You do realize that is basically a vote swing, which you state is bad? Stand by your words. If I get lynched we will get good info on alderan, gum, dyh, sloosh, Phagga, and night. Why would he argue so confidently against a vote swing AWAY from him? 1Chocolate is also one of the first to start getting suspicious of alderan. After day 1, some of the heat was finally lifted off of him and focused on alderan by others. Following this, we have sloosh post a large case against alderan, followed by JekylAndHyde's case, and alderan is under more and more pressure. Instead of continuing his case against alderan, chocolate decides to launch a case against night fury of all people, who no one had posted any suspicions against yet. If he were mafia, why would he not join others in pressuring alderan (or the case that is piling up against gumshoe), and go for a target who would be harder to mislynch? I sincerely believe chocolate is town, and that some of those pressuring him hard are looking scummy to me. Those who voted chocolate on day 1: phagga, sloosh, NightFury, ghostI currently do not have as much info as I'd like on NightFury to say much about him. Sloosh's actions seem pro-town to me so far, and though he has not posted as much as others, his posts have generally been full of content. Now for the remaining two: Phagga has been trying very hard for a chocolate lynch the whole game. 2 He takes a moment to call gumshoe out on why he didn't change his vote from ghost, and why he felt the need to "take responsibility" for voting chocolate if he flipped green, and then goes straight back to attacking chocolate. He is either getting tunnel vision with chocolate 3, or trying to get the mislynch on him. Have a look at this post. He accuses chocolate of relying on the arguments of others, and voting lurkers (a policy which he did state at the start), but ignores the fact that it is chocolate who first brought up a case against alderan (albeit a rather lackluster one) and states emphatically that he will vote chocolate again on day 2, presumably for not coming up with original cases/evidence, when there was still 48 irl hours for chocolate to contribute on day 2 (day 1 had not even ended yet). This early vote behaviour was the same thing we called nttea out for when he wanted a default alderan lynch. Then we have ghost. His last few posts have all been aimed at chocolate. here they areGhost and phagga engage in banter that seems like bullying chocolate to me in the first post, and the second post is unnecessary, because although chocolate did not do anything like make a new case, it was still a valid point. Nttea should not be posting like that, and if he is as clueless as he says he is, chocolate was only helping him. The way he analyses the chocolate quotes in the third post is very condescending in tone. He could have done so without putting chocolate down, as others in the thread have done. 1bI also do not trust this post made by ghost: Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 11:03 ghost_403 wrote: You see, this is how I see it.
We could vote to lynch Igabod. That's not even really a bad idea. He's been lurking hardcore. Kinda scummy if you ask me. And I don't like scummy. However, his flip doesn't tell us anything. Maybe, we'll get lucky and lynch a scum. Odds are about, what, 28%? You can do worse than that.
Other option: You lynch either me or chocolate. I think it's pretty well established, one of the two of us is scum. If whoever gets lynched flips red, awesome! Lynched a scum! If not, guess who the first person on the chopping block is tomorrow. The guy who wasn't lynched. Either way, going into day 3, the town is down one scum. Trying to gain the trust of the town by encouraging a chocolate or ghost lynch on day 1. If chocolate flipped green, suspicion may still have fallen off of ghost because mafia would presumably not make a post like this. I realise that this point is a bit WIFOM (I think I'm using the term correctly?). Basically, it seems to me that phagga and ghost are actively trying to discredit chocolate after his already shaky start, and possibly also get the mislynch on him.
1 You are aware that later in your post at 1b you quote ghost_403 who wrote against a vote switch away from him and chocolate, and say that that post is a reason you don't trust ghost_403? This is contradictory.
2 The question you should ask yourself here is: Is this something a townie would do? And if so, is it also something scum would do? I doubt scum would want to stay in the spotlight like that.
Also, If you are town, and you feel strongly about someone being scum, what are you gonna do? - Try to push a lynch on that person even if people will not listen to you - let the person of the hook because noone listens to you, and pick another target
I would be stupid to push his lynch so hard if I was scum and knew he was town. When he would get lynched and flipped green, everyone would be on my heels. You do not want that as scum, specially not so early in the game.
Nothing Chocolate said so far convinced me that he is not scum. That's why I still want him lynched.
3 I am aware that I am prone to tunneling Chocolate, and I am currently reading through several filters (again) to give an update on who else I think is fishy.
|
Generally: I don't care if this is anyones first game on TL Mafia. This is a newbie game, noone has a lot of experience with TL Mafia. This game is here to learn, so please stop making excuses like that. I have already skipped several paragraphs who start with that, and I will continue to skip them in the future.
DoYouHas:
On March 01 2012 14:57 DoYouHas wrote: Alright people, this is getting a little ridiculous. We can't let this thread stagnate midday.
Ghost and Phagga, do you agree with how I handled NightFury?
No, I don't agree. You accused him of not generating content. He agrees, but then only writes an excuse, and you are already giving him a free pass. Now there is no more pressure on him to generate real content, which is what would have given us more information on him. You left him of the hook way to early. Instead, I would have liked to see you call him out on his confession of not generating content, and pressure him more at least until he starts generating content.
I noticed several times that people don't want to pressure someone anymore after the target went from scummy to towny. Why not? If you already started, pressure some more. Townies don't need to be afraid to get pressured. After all, they have no reason to lie, and if they write what they think and observe, than they have nothing to fear. And it will generate more information which will enable more people to judge better if someone is town or not.
But if you let Nightfury of the hook like that, and nightfury gets lynched anyway and flips red, I will immediatly get suspicious about your reluctance to pressure him after making a case on him.
On March 01 2012 14:57 DoYouHas wrote: Who is your greatest suspicion right now?
- Chocolate - Gumshoe - Alderan
k2hd:
+ Show Spoiler +On March 01 2012 22:16 k2hd wrote:Show nested quote +I would be stupid to push his lynch so hard if I was scum and knew he was town. When he would get lynched and flipped green, everyone would be on my heels. You do not want that as scum, specially not so early in the game. Perhaps it is enough that chocolate is discredited, and you know you don't have the numbers to mislynch him without mafia stacking on him. At this stage, there is a low chance of chocolate actually being lynched and thus, flipping green, since there are multiple cases out on alderan, gumshoe and myself. It is also a convenient way of wasting a vote and not committing to anyone else, but as you say, I will wait to see what you have to say about others when you're done with their filters. I will try my best to see what you have to say in the morning before class. This is why I am placing a preliminary vote on ghost first.
This is just not true. On the first day, my vote was on Chocolate the whole day. After this vote + Show Spoiler +On February 28 2012 07:36 NightFury wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote: Chocolate there were 5 votes on Chocolate for roughly 4 hours, with 8 votes he would have gotten lynched. I wrote the following two posts during those 3 hours:
+ Show Spoiler +On February 28 2012 08:36 phagga wrote: So, folks, I will be offline for the night in about 20 minutes. So far my vote stays on Chocolate. I have read a few interesting things about others (specially steveling), but so far nothing could convince me to switch my vote to another person. I still think Chocolate is our best lynch. On February 28 2012 10:00 phagga wrote: I'm off to bed now. My vote stays on chocolate.
That was 2 hours before the deadline. There was still the possibility that he would get lynched. 40 minutes before the deadline JekyllAndHyde unvoted Chocolate.
Chocolate:
+ Show Spoiler +On March 01 2012 20:58 phagga wrote:To k2hd: + Show Spoiler +On March 01 2012 19:39 k2hd wrote:I believe that chocolate is town. He's had a LOT of pressure put on him due to his sub-par posting on day 1, and had to defend himself left, right and centre for the rest of day 1. He's spent most of his time on defensive posts, and perhaps hasn't been able to focus on gathering much of his own evidence on other players. He is very aggressive in trying to force lurkers to post more by voting, but as was mentioned by DYH, this could just have been a poorly thought out way of fostering discussion. I understand that it may have been an easy way to avoid generating original content/cases of his own, but again, this is probably just the play style of a townie who is unsure of what to do, or who would rather not stick his head out too much. I did not check up on everyone's previous games, but from what I gather from what others have said, chocolate was mafia in his last game, had to tone down his posting because it was too aggressive, and hasn't played town before (unless he's had another game that I don't know about). There is also this post by chocolate: Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 11:26 Chocolate wrote: You do realize that is basically a vote swing, which you state is bad? Stand by your words. If I get lynched we will get good info on alderan, gum, dyh, sloosh, Phagga, and night. Why would he argue so confidently against a vote swing AWAY from him? 1Chocolate is also one of the first to start getting suspicious of alderan. After day 1, some of the heat was finally lifted off of him and focused on alderan by others. Following this, we have sloosh post a large case against alderan, followed by JekylAndHyde's case, and alderan is under more and more pressure. Instead of continuing his case against alderan, chocolate decides to launch a case against night fury of all people, who no one had posted any suspicions against yet. If he were mafia, why would he not join others in pressuring alderan (or the case that is piling up against gumshoe), and go for a target who would be harder to mislynch? I sincerely believe chocolate is town, and that some of those pressuring him hard are looking scummy to me. Those who voted chocolate on day 1: phagga, sloosh, NightFury, ghostI currently do not have as much info as I'd like on NightFury to say much about him. Sloosh's actions seem pro-town to me so far, and though he has not posted as much as others, his posts have generally been full of content. Now for the remaining two: Phagga has been trying very hard for a chocolate lynch the whole game. 2 He takes a moment to call gumshoe out on why he didn't change his vote from ghost, and why he felt the need to "take responsibility" for voting chocolate if he flipped green, and then goes straight back to attacking chocolate. He is either getting tunnel vision with chocolate 3, or trying to get the mislynch on him. Have a look at this post. He accuses chocolate of relying on the arguments of others, and voting lurkers (a policy which he did state at the start), but ignores the fact that it is chocolate who first brought up a case against alderan (albeit a rather lackluster one) and states emphatically that he will vote chocolate again on day 2, presumably for not coming up with original cases/evidence, when there was still 48 irl hours for chocolate to contribute on day 2 (day 1 had not even ended yet). This early vote behaviour was the same thing we called nttea out for when he wanted a default alderan lynch. Then we have ghost. His last few posts have all been aimed at chocolate. here they areGhost and phagga engage in banter that seems like bullying chocolate to me in the first post, and the second post is unnecessary, because although chocolate did not do anything like make a new case, it was still a valid point. Nttea should not be posting like that, and if he is as clueless as he says he is, chocolate was only helping him. The way he analyses the chocolate quotes in the third post is very condescending in tone. He could have done so without putting chocolate down, as others in the thread have done. 1bI also do not trust this post made by ghost: Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 11:03 ghost_403 wrote: You see, this is how I see it.
We could vote to lynch Igabod. That's not even really a bad idea. He's been lurking hardcore. Kinda scummy if you ask me. And I don't like scummy. However, his flip doesn't tell us anything. Maybe, we'll get lucky and lynch a scum. Odds are about, what, 28%? You can do worse than that.
Other option: You lynch either me or chocolate. I think it's pretty well established, one of the two of us is scum. If whoever gets lynched flips red, awesome! Lynched a scum! If not, guess who the first person on the chopping block is tomorrow. The guy who wasn't lynched. Either way, going into day 3, the town is down one scum. Trying to gain the trust of the town by encouraging a chocolate or ghost lynch on day 1. If chocolate flipped green, suspicion may still have fallen off of ghost because mafia would presumably not make a post like this. I realise that this point is a bit WIFOM (I think I'm using the term correctly?). Basically, it seems to me that phagga and ghost are actively trying to discredit chocolate after his already shaky start, and possibly also get the mislynch on him. 1 You are aware that later in your post at 1b you quote ghost_403 who wrote against a vote switch away from him and chocolate, and say that that post is a reason you don't trust ghost_403? This is contradictory. 2 The question you should ask yourself here is: Is this something a townie would do? And if so, is it also something scum would do? I doubt scum would want to stay in the spotlight like that.
Also, If you are town, and you feel strongly about someone being scum, what are you gonna do? - Try to push a lynch on that person even if people will not listen to you - let the person of the hook because noone listens to you, and pick another target
I would be stupid to push his lynch so hard if I was scum and knew he was town. When he would get lynched and flipped green, everyone would be on my heels. You do not want that as scum, specially not so early in the game.
Nothing Chocolate said so far convinced me that he is not scum. That's why I still want him lynched.3 I am aware that I am prone to tunneling Chocolate, and I am currently reading through several filters (again) to give an update on who else I think is fishy.
On March 01 2012 21:50 Chocolate wrote: Don't have much time to post but my style last game was very passive and lurky, k2hd. Phagga 1b is a good point, 2 is looking pretty wifom, and I'm glad to hear about 3.
K2 I'm really glad to see you posting. Keep it up
I disagree. Scum does not want to be in the spotlight. People in the spotlight get analyzed more, and scum has to play a role / lie to look townie, so the chance that people will reveal their true role is higher. You will not often find scum that is going to play aggresively, and most of the time they won't get far with it because they have to hide too much.
|
Who I find to be scummy and would be ok to lynch (in this order):
- Chocolate - gumshoe: A lot of fluff, not much content. I don't like how he wanted to take responsibility for a chocolate lynch, his explanation did not convince me completely. Then he started zelblade for the roleblock information, which looked like rolefishing to me. The way he suddenly was asking for replacement was just... well, let's just say it pissed me off. This is clear anti-town behaviour. - Alderan: I never liked his hypothetical dialog between ghost_403 and Chocolate. Also:
On February 28 2012 09:44 Alderan wrote: Currently I find k2hd questionable as well, but I don't have a concrete case and it's too late in the voting period to be discussing a brand new case I feel. Will be a good one fore tomorrow, especially if igabod flips green.
On February 28 2012 09:51 Alderan wrote: I honestly get the feeling Steveling is more likely to be scum than igabod, It's only on't a gut feeling, but let's be real, we're lynching lurkers, we don't have much else.
##vote: Steveling
At this point we already had trouble finding a fitting lynch target. And while several people had talked about steveling behaving scummy, noone had voted him. Alderan even acknowledges that it is late in the vote to bring in new cases, but votes for a person that noone had voted at that point nevertheless. And his argumentation is that steveling is more likely to be scum. I don't like that one at all.
Whereelse will we find scum? Somewhere in k2hd and nttea I guess. There are some people that I get more or less a null read atm, and only two that I see as townish.
Just to make this clear: The vote deadline is at 4am in my timezone (CET), so I will probably not be online then. I will come online again 4-6 hours before the deadline. For now, my vote stays on Chocolate.
|
On March 02 2012 03:03 slOosh wrote: And no I'm not discrediting your name in the second quote. Read the whole post in context. We are dangerously close to the lynch deadline with votes spread among multiple people, and I'm emphasizing the need to rally and make a decision. The bolded part is because I think some people (especially the newer ones) are timid and want to hear all the voices and cases out in the open and discussed, but I'm being realistic and pointing out that time is not a luxury.
I agree. We have votes on 5 different people at the moment. I will switch my vote to gumshoe now.
Vote gumshoe
|
We are over the soft deadline of 8 hours, and only 7 of 13 people have voted. Disappointing.
|
On March 02 2012 07:39 gumshoe wrote: man why is this thread so quiet, does seriously no one have any questions for me? Is test the only one interested in my accusation? This is kinda sad -_-
Because I am going to bed now. Your case comes way to late for me to consider it. My vote is cast.
@all, there are currently 4 votes on gumshoe, so this is a possible lynch. I hope we do lynch someone today.
I'll be online again in about 10 hours. Good night.
|
I shortly want to pick up two things gumshoe said, although he is no longer in the game.
On March 02 2012 09:07 gumshoe wrote: phagga basicaly said he was ok with a no lynch at the start of the game, saying we should only lynch scum, not lurkers
That is not true.
1.) I stated clearly that I want to lynch everday:
On February 27 2012 07:35 phagga wrote:Where Did I say that we should not lynch? All I said is that we should try to lynch scum everyday. Don't lynch lurkers only because they lurk. If we have evidence that they actively avoid the thread (e.g. are in the TL Mafia IRC channel the whole day but don't post here), then yes, lynch them. Else, we need more reason to lynch them. I do not like a "no lynch on Day 1"-Policy. We should be lynching every day. It's like a tradition 
2.) In the above quote, I also state clearly that I don't want to lynch lurkers ONLY because they lurk, and not that we should not lynch lurkers at all. For example, nttea has now avoided the thread on purpose. He was online (as can see by his vote) and probably read the thread, but posted nothing and ignored all questions to him. This is scummy, and he should be lynched, as I also explain in the above quote.
On March 02 2012 09:07 gumshoe wrote:
Calls me pathetic ) : hurt my feelings,but also suggests that hes trying to destroy character regardless.
I apologize for saying that. It was inappropriate.
On March 02 2012 16:20 DoYouHas wrote: First and foremost comes the lynching of nttea. He lurks all game, drops a vote in the voting thread without saying anything in this thread. And just happens to vote for a townie. There is no backing your way out of that. He is gone tomorrow.
I completely agree. I also think that it would benefit town if we could agree on him as next lynch target early.
More from me later, got work to do.
|
On March 03 2012 05:11 Chocolate wrote: Here's the case on phagga. This won't be as good to you all unless I die because a large portion of this is because he was pushing me.
Won't link/quote because i'm too lazy, will use number of his posts since he has 2 pages. Not everything is bad. 4. Suspicious of fourface. Thinks he is bad town. 5. starts on me. Dislikes what I'm doing because in #2 he was against lynching lurkers. Thinks me throwing votes around is suspicious and an attempt to get an early bandwagon rolling. 6. wishy washy on fourface, ghost, and igabod. I am the most suspicious for going after easy targets. If he believes I could get a random bandwagon going on a lurker then he is just naive. The only actual target I have gone after is fourface. 7. Doesn't want to vote fourface, suspicious of ghost. Says I disappeared, which is understandable because I did due to my schedule. This is all completely understandable up till now except maybe his position on ghost. He leaves him open to lynch (I don't think I want him lynched) but says he is toxic. The posts between 6-7 by ghost include - telling 4 face not to edit - saying we should lynch someone, preferably scum but otherwise a lurker - what time he'll be on - just got home from work. I think this is pretty suspicious. I want to do a case on ghost before the night is over too. 9. Keeps his vote on me after I made my defense. I can kinda understand this because he said he wanted a lynch no matter what on day1. 19. Still going after me. 1 isn't even a point for why I'm mafia. 2 isn't valid because fourface wasn't making substantial posts like I wanted him to. 3 is a good point but I've since remedied that. 4 is the same. 5 is good but I was afraid to lynch ghost because I thought he was green due to the wifom argument, leaving me only lurkers to lynch. I've expanded my suspicious arsenal since then, however. 20. 1 says he doesn't want to lynch lurkers, his opinion. He is trying to force his opinion on doyouhas though, not a good way to deduce scum. 2 says what I just said 21-23 completely misunderstood at first. they're fine 24. completely agree 25. see above 26. votes on me again. doesn't buy my arguments. 27. agree, 2 is wifom though 28. disagrees with me 29. says I am suspicious without reasoning, presumably doesn't buy any of my defense posts. 30. votes on gumshoe 32. goes to bed 33. completely agree
Most of my suspcion of him is how little he has brought to the table, especially on d1. He hasn't done any pbpa and as far as I can tell hasn't started suspicion on anyone either. He His votes come at good times for pressure but also seem to be bandwagon-ish. I want him to contribute more. Finally, he has lynched gumshoe, town, and pushed very hard on me. He goes after each of us right after we become candidates. I want to see a pbpa from him soon.
Congratulations, you successfully summarised several of my posts with barely any comment. I will answer to it tommorow in more detail, should I still be alive.
My wife and kids are sick, which means I barely got any time atm, so dont expect too much from me for the next 24 hours.
|
I just spent 6 hours at the hospital with my son, and I'm tired as hell.
On March 03 2012 09:34 NightFury wrote: Okay, I'm back. I would like to present my case against ghost_403.
The primary basis for my case is that he a) speaks with a voice of authority and confidence in uncertain circumstances, b) tries to obtain information from townies that is beneficial to the mafia and c) some other miscellaneous things I found.
Part A: Authority and Confidence in Uncertain Circumstances.
Remind me, why is confidence a bad thing as townie? Should not every townie be confident, as he has no reason to hide anything and is just trying to do his best? That does not mean that mafia can't be confident too, but saying that a townie should NOT be confident is a strange understanding of the game mechanics.
On March 03 2012 09:34 NightFury wrote:Part B: Acquiring Information only useful to Mafia. Show nested quote +On March 02 2012 08:24 ghost_403 wrote: Okay gumshoe, got a question for you.
Let's pretend for a moment that you are a vigilante. It's the end of night 2, and you just know that you are gonna die. Mafia figured it out, and you're as good as dead. You have one shot.
Who do you shoot?
Hard mode: nttea and test are not valid responses. This post had me extremely confused. And now that gumshoe has flipped green, it might be making some more sense now. Ghost was trying to see if there was a vigilante
How? Please explain me how you can find out with such a question if there is a vigilante? I always thought that I am good logical thinking, but I can't find a good reason why this shows that there is a vigilante.
On March 03 2012 09:34 NightFury wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2012 09:14 ghost_403 wrote:That's when I asked him this. + Show Spoiler +On March 02 2012 08:24 ghost_403 wrote: Okay gumshoe, got a question for you.
Let's pretend for a moment that you are a vigilante. It's the end of night 2, and you just know that you are gonna die. Mafia figured it out, and you're as good as dead. You have one shot.
Who do you shoot?
Hard mode: nttea and test are not valid responses. His response? On March 02 2012 08:37 gumshoe wrote: It comes down to phagga or sloosh, but in the end I'd end going with phagga because I dont like how aggresive he is and how he tries to destroy his opponents regardless of wether they are lynched.
This response of his is based on nothing. Since the end of night 1, he has barely mentioned either of these players. There's no reason for this. I asked why. In his post, he has mostly personal reasons (sorry gumshoe  ). I'll respond to his case in another post. Combine the fact that he dug himself into a hole yesterday, only wants to lynch people who aren't around to defend themselves, and the fact that when pressed he can't provide a proper opinion on a single scummy player in the game, and I you have a good enough reason for me to do the following. ##vote gumshoeAside: nttea, if you don't tell me why you voted, I'm lynching you tomorrow. I actually think gumshoe's answer was valid. Why would he just want to feed potentially useful information to the mafia? Given the circumstances, gumshoe was 100% entitled to his opinion and ghost just wasn't happy that he didn't get the answer he wanted.
Why do you think that gumshoe's answer is valid? What potential useful information could gumshoe give away at that moment? (speak hypothetically, if you think it might give away something for mafia)
|
On March 03 2012 05:11 Chocolate wrote: Says I disappeared, which is understandable because I did due to my schedule.
Dear chocolate, in case it did not dawn on you so far: The reason why I wrote this was also (not only) because you voted for me about 17 hours after the game started. When I wrote the above sentence you were gone for over 21 hour. So after your own standards, you were a lurker, and needed to be pressured.
But don't jump to false conclusions. That's not why I think you're scum.
On March 03 2012 05:11 Chocolate wrote: 19. Still going after me. 1 isn't even a point for why I'm mafia.
20. 1 says he doesn't want to lynch lurkers, his opinion. He is trying to force his opinion on doyouhas though, not a good way to deduce scum
Believe it or not, not everything in my posts is written to find scum. Sometimes I just try to show people that I think their way is bad for town.
On March 03 2012 05:11 Chocolate wrote: Most of my suspcion of him is how little he has brought to the table, especially on d1. He hasn't done any pbpa and as far as I can tell hasn't started suspicion on anyone either.
I was suspicious of gumshoe before the train started roling.
+ Show Spoiler +On February 28 2012 21:35 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 11:20 gumshoe wrote:On February 28 2012 10:13 ghost_403 wrote:On February 28 2012 10:04 DoYouHas wrote:On February 28 2012 09:56 phagga wrote:On February 28 2012 09:47 DoYouHas wrote: We don't know igabod is getting modkilled. There is every chance that he will be replaced. Because of this I still think that he is our best lynch option.
This argumentation is absolutely stupid. If igabod is getting replaced, then he was not playing the game at all. Therefore him lurking does not say anything at all about his alignement. He might even be a blue for all we know, and some real life matter keep him from playing. This is exactly the reason why we should NOT just lynch any lurker. So as long as igabod is not casting a vote, we should not try to lynch him. It is too late to swing a vote towards someone not Ghost/Chocolate/igabod or maybe Steve. I do not believe that Ghost/Chocolate should be lynched today. Yes, it is possible that igabod is not scum, we don't know. The reason we lynch igabod now is so that we don't go into day2 with a person we have absolutely no information on, which is not a situation I want to be in. That makes him a better lynch target than Chocolate or Ghost to me. I completely disagree with you there. The entirety of the game has built up to this moment. Lynching either of us will give the town a plethora of information. You can look back and see who pushed for what lynch, who supported them, who jumped on board, who jumped off... quite frankly, lynching someone other than the two of us is wasteful. Lynching a non-posting lurker at this point tells you about them. Lynching either me or Chocolate tells you about everyone in the town. Just wanna say I really appreciate you saying this, I will take my vote off you. Unvote: Ghost(will do it in the thread) You did not unvote him, you only faked it. In the voting thread, your vote stayed on ghost_403. Why? Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 11:27 gumshoe wrote: god I hate no lynches ) : like unless its analytically the right move(as was the case last game when we had a potential inactive townie) I feel like were just depriving ourselves of information
If chocolate flips green(which he probably will considering it looks like he's getting bussed, not gonna lie about that) i'll take responsibility. Why do you want to take responsibility for it? On February 29 2012 00:53 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On February 29 2012 00:15 gumshoe wrote:On February 28 2012 23:26 phagga wrote:what about my second question, gumshoe? On February 28 2012 21:35 phagga wrote:On February 28 2012 11:27 gumshoe wrote: god I hate no lynches ) : like unless its analytically the right move(as was the case last game when we had a potential inactive townie) I feel like were just depriving ourselves of information
If chocolate flips green(which he probably will considering it looks like he's getting bussed, not gonna lie about that) i'll take responsibility. Why do you want to take responsibility for it? That last point was me bieng transparent, now im going to be anylytical. If chocolate flips red ive killed my own teamamte, if chocolate flips green i fall under suspiciun, as scum its an all around bad move, as town its a calclated risk. Now unless you want invole the m word(i dare you to say it) theres not much all to discuss about the matter. Any other questions? It just came out of nothing. You mentioned Chocolate a few times, but failed to vote on him. You barely pushed him. I tried to push Chocolate the whole day, so why not make me responsible if he would flip green? Or what about Alderaan, who made the first case on Chocolate? Also, if a majority of people is voting Chocolate, everyone has some responsibility in it. Why would town want to single out a person only because of that one vote and make him/her responsible for a mislynch? That does not make any sense, sometimes townies get lynched because wrong decisions are made. But then you don't go and point finger at single person, instead you start analyzing who voted for that townie when and for what reason. Claiming responsibility before the lynch has even happened and before it is clear if it is a myslynch or not is utterly pointless. Unless you want to put focus on how you are helpful and care about town. But a townie normally does not have to do that. uh, Marry me? (I am not sure which word you mean. If you mean mafia, why not just write it? It's not like you're reading the insignia of The One Ring and Sauron can hear you.)
you completely ignored this in your case.
Also, I write that I am suspicious of Alderan, which you also ignored in your case.
And about generating content: My questions to DYH led to content that other later used to build a case vs him. Creating content does not only happen by writing cases.
On March 03 2012 05:11 Chocolate wrote: I want to see a pbpa from him soon.
somehow I don't feel obliged to obey you. Oh, and where is your pbpa, anyway?
I'm ignoring the rest of your so called case, because it is more of a documentary anway.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On March 04 2012 06:24 NightFury wrote: Small preamble to start off with. I know I said I’d be sharing my thoughts on k2hd previously and I also noticed ghost’s reply to my case. However, when going over k2hd and the game as a whole, I noticed something completely different. I haven’t forgotten the other things I need to do, but I feel this is an important issue.
There has been one theme this entire game: Produce Content.
Since the very beginning of the game, this theme has been on everyone’s minds. Of course, producing content is essential or else there’d be nothing. However, everyone’s been obsessed with the theme and I believe it is extremely detrimental. We have people who berate others for not producing original content and using that as basis for their cases. We also have people who are trying to produce content but may not be completely successful in the endeavour. We have people who belong to both groups and other sorts of categories.
If anyone takes a look at the entire thread I’m sure they’d agree that town is in a huge mess right now. I don’t think this mess is even the mafia’s doing. It has become this way due to the fixation on producing content. We are less than 30 hours away from the next lynch and things are going nowhere. What we need is some form of direction that can reorganize town (I am completely open to suggestions and trying to think of something).
In response to this huge mess, the mafia have been able to hide away in general. But I am willing to claim that the mafia aren’t really hiding out of sight. They’re amongst the people who are trying to force content out of people just for the sake of content. It sets up easy targets and given the mentality of the entire thread, it will draw attention to low producers and away from themselves.
We are probably at the most critical part of the game thus far. How the next lynch and night goes will probably set the tone for the rest of the game. The way things are going right now are not good and we need to rally to produce content that is actually productive and not just for the sake of making a post.
I agree with that. It does not help town if everyone starts throwing cases willy-nilly. You do not only generate content by writing cases, so don't overdo it.
I can barely keep my eyes open, I'm off to bed.
|
##Vote Alderan from my mobile.
I wrote d2 that he is a lynch candidate. I just got through his filter again, and stick with it for now. Will have to read through dyh filter later. Expect more from me in 3 to 4 hours.
|
Where's Alderan anyway? Guy posted a vote for nttea over 50 hours ago (that never made it into the vote thread) and disappeared.
Also anyone else notice how his activity dropped after N1? His D1/N1-Posts fill 3 pages of filter, from there on it's less than one page of filter for the other days/nights.
|
I just read through DYH's Filter. But before, I had 2 enlightenments today:
1.) The first one is about this post:
On February 28 2012 09:56 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:47 DoYouHas wrote: We don't know igabod is getting modkilled. There is every chance that he will be replaced. Because of this I still think that he is our best lynch option.
This argumentation is absolutely stupid. If igabod is getting replaced, then he was not playing the game at all. Therefore him lurking does not say anything at all about his alignement. He might even be a blue for all we know, and some real life matter keep him from playing. This is exactly the reason why we should NOT just lynch any lurker. So as long as igabod is not casting a vote, we should not try to lynch him.
I later wrote in a later answer to him that I did not find his play suspicious at the time. The reason I said this was that I thought that no matter if he was town or scum, he could not know if igabod was town. Only today when I reread all posts it dawned on me that this is not true (obviously). If he was scum, he would have known all along that igabod was town. And suddenly it made a bit more sense that he pushed that lynch.
2.) I really just realized today (after reading this post) that I wrote the following answer to the same person as the quote above:
On March 02 2012 01:44 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2012 14:57 DoYouHas wrote: Alright people, this is getting a little ridiculous. We can't let this thread stagnate midday.
Ghost and Phagga, do you agree with how I handled NightFury? No, I don't agree. You accused him of not generating content. He agrees, but then only writes an excuse, and you are already giving him a free pass. Now there is no more pressure on him to generate real content, which is what would have given us more information on him. You left him of the hook way to early. Instead, I would have liked to see you call him out on his confession of not generating content, and pressure him more at least until he starts generating content. I noticed several times that people don't want to pressure someone anymore after the target went from scummy to towny. Why not? If you already started, pressure some more. Townies don't need to be afraid to get pressured. After all, they have no reason to lie, and if they write what they think and observe, than they have nothing to fear. And it will generate more information which will enable more people to judge better if someone is town or not. But if you let Nightfury of the hook like that, and nightfury gets lynched anyway and flips red, I will immediatly get suspicious about your reluctance to pressure him after making a case on him.
My Stance on DoYouHas:
After reading his filter, I find a lot of small things that I find strange, but by themselves are not noteworthy. examples: - Thinks Quatol confirms FourFace as town - Forgets his case - the igabod thing mentioned before - Let's nightfury of the hook too easily (that one especially irks me when I reread his reaction to nightfurys defense) - The whole "parallels to the other mafia game" thing - confuses ntteas vote
Collected, they raise suspicioun. It might be that is all a coincidence, perhaps it's not. I am suspicious of him, but not enough to want to lynch him over Alderan.
As we are again in the bad situation that roughly 4 hours before the deadline only 5 people have voted, I just keep my vote on Alderan and hope that we will be able to get a majority for a lynch.
I am off to bed in about 30 minutes.
|
|
|
|