|
Dude.
He isn't defending [UoN]Sentinel. Then he would be yelling and screaming and telling everybody else to get their votes off him. He is saying "I don't think he's scum" with no analysis at all. This is what scum do so they don't have to vote for townies. He is saying it for town credit. Isn't that infinitely obvious to anyone?
What do you mean either "worst scum" or "confirmed townie"? That doesn't make any sense at all, and furthermore, you're not concluding anything right now and it's 30 mins before deadline on a day where nobody is around. Don't you see how ludicrous this is?
What do you know about the "history of mafia"? How many games did you play and where?
|
Went back to look and see who started this nonsense against Nisani, guess whose name I found there? Yup, BaronFel. His reasoning:
After looking through Nisani201's filter, I think he's rather suspicious (short posts, didn't explain his decisions much). He's probably my main suspect at this point.
Or at least this is the only reasoning I could find given. What the hell is this? Did he even read Nisani's filter? Never attempted to make any analysis of Nisani's vote against Sentinel, never attempted to analyze any of Nisani's posts at all.
It's interesting how much more active BaronFel became after Sinani was lost on Day1. Still supremely lurking though. Remember what I said a while back that new mafia players are going to have a tendency to lurk? Most are going to lurk out of fear of slipping up.
##Vote: Timeaisis
For now (He has been acting odd, and I think playing up the "Im new" card a bit too much), although I'm still watching prplhz (for having such a surprising turn around of character) and Sinensis (for some questionable logic, which even as a townie, is dangerous).
I feel like a complete idiot for not catching this one before. A complete stupid idiot. ET in his bad analysis called out Time for playing the "I'm new" card too much. After a quick peek at Time's filter I realized that he had only mentioned this twice at the extreme start of the game. The word "new" only appeared once in Time's filter before ET called him out. I called out ET about this one Day 2, and ET has since admitted that his analysis was bad.
For Baron to have picked up on this, he must have just been copying exactly what ET had written without any checking himself (as checking would have led him to the same conclusion as I reached, that ET's reasoning was bad). VERY interesting that Baron was just repeating exactly what ET was saying, without mentioning that it was ET who said it. This has bandwagon-starting (is that a thing? who cares no time!) written all over it.
Senensis as I said in day 1 seems to just be hampering the town and I really don't think he'll ever really try to help us find the rest of the scum...(I could overlook his day 1, but day 2 it's almost like he's trying to do this on purpose. If there was a joker in this game, I'd assume he was it xD)
Missed this mess of a reasoning too. Damnit.
By itself it may not be suspicious, but the night before his name was being said a lot, and then today he seems really jumpy put the focus on to others rather then defending himself. That just makes him more suspicious to me. Perhaps its the wrong feeling to have but that's just my take on it.
Here's the rest of the "reason" on Nisani. Does he look "jumpy" to anyone else? How do we even tell that on a forum???
Bottom line Baron is looking good as scum.
Interesting that the ONLY other person voting against Nisani right now is [UoN]Sentinel. Looking at him next, if votes stay where they are right now, I very well may make #4 on Sentinel, but let me read through his filter first.
|
On February 10 2012 11:32 prplhz wrote:
Dude.
He isn't defending [UoN]Sentinel. Then he would be yelling and screaming and telling everybody else to get their votes off him. He is saying "I don't think he's scum" with no analysis at all. This is what scum do so they don't have to vote for townies. He is saying it for town credit. Isn't that infinitely obvious to anyone?
What do you mean either "worst scum" or "confirmed townie"? That doesn't make any sense at all, and furthermore, you're not concluding anything right now and it's 30 mins before deadline on a day where nobody is around. Don't you see how ludicrous this is?
What do you know about the "history of mafia"? How many games did you play and where?
Sorry didn't explain that well in my haste.
I was talking about Nisani defending Sinesis in that post. He says quite clearly--in the midst of a bandwagon--that Sinesis isn't scum and we should be focusing elsewhere. Why would scum do that now that we can confirm Sinesis was town?
|
I have only sided with Baron as of recent, and only because I believe Nisani's logic sucks.
I was also the first to vote him today.
|
On February 10 2012 11:39 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
I have only sided with Baron as of recent, and only because I believe Nisani's logic sucks.
I was also the first to vote him today.
You're not helping the case against yourself.
Still looking through your filter, I may change my mind. But in case I miss the deadline:
Vote [UoN]Sentinel
|
well crap. 20 mins to deadline. not like I fell asleep or whatever. reading, will post final thoughts at -10 mins.
|
DAMNIT
##Vote [UoN]Sentinel
|
If the act in itself may not be suspicious, what made you more suspicious of him? Can you get more text-wally, maybe write a bigger post on him, and I don't necessarily mean post-by-post-analysis, but try to make this "feeling", this "take on it" that you have more understandable to other townies.
I don't mean the act is not suspicious, I mean that by itself it wouldn't necessarily make me jump out and say "SCUM!". For example, getting life insurance for your wife isn't suspicious. Getting it before your wife mysteriously dies is type of deal (not to that extreme though in this instance).
What's been said about Nisani has been my feeling. He doesn't post his reasoning very often, yet still does a lot of accusations. (Of course, he only just recently posted a big analysis, which really just him accusing sentinel of fluff (ironic) and voting for the two town lynches (which a majority of us obviously had to...))
What is your take on the night hits so far? Vilonis night1, mderg night2, why didn't they hit TheToast or EchelonTee or you or me? How do you think TheToast and EchelonTee has acted today? What is your "feeling" and "take" on them?
I'm not really sure I can give anything amazing in terms of why Vilonis and mderg were killed. They were both pretty logical and weren't talking a huge amount, that's probably as good as any explanation. As for why they didn't hit others, not sure either. It would just be speculation and couldn't really be used in an argument for or against anyone.
TheToast has posted a lot (which is considered a good thing as shown by me being voted and him not) and has been pretty logical, although sometime's aggressive in his beliefs. I really have no real reason to think he's scum at all.
Echelon is also somewhat aggressive in his approach, but he also calls out everyone (similar to you) in their arguments (his last few posts he's counter argued me, nisani, bluelightz, and a bit to you). I am leaning town with him as well.
|
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Vote: [UoN]Sentinel
|
|
|
God I am an idiot today.
##Vote: [UoN]Sentinel
# sign, check
colon, check
bold, check
spelling, check
Okay, I think I have it this time.
|
keep trying.
how about Vote: [UoN]Sentinel
|
I like how you just pick out one part of my post to reply to
and then your reply is asking a question I am answering in that very same part
meanwhile ignoring everything else
and still not concluding anything
no votes or anything
20 mins before deadline
when we're facing no lynch
which is great for scum because then we have to go through a shitty day like this TWICE MORE
|
oh i fucked up too lol
but you finally got it
|
Sentinel didn't you say you had a "final defense"? or something? was that it?
|
I'm not too sure about Sentinel yet, and no time for a in depth analysis. Who all would favor lynching Baron instead?
|
what happens if no one has a majority?
##Unvote: [UoN]Sentinel
##Vote: No Lynch
|
United States22154 Posts
On February 10 2012 11:49 EchelonTee wrote:
what happens if no one has a majority?
No one is lynched ^_^
|
A NO LYNCH HAPPENS
DO YOU REALLY WANT TO GO THROUGH ANOTHER DAY LIKE THIS???????????????
|
Well we did have a majority up until just then. I'm 50-50 on Sentinel though I think we really need a scum lynch tonight. I'm willing to take the gamble if you all are...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
