|
@Bluelightz Who do you want to lynch? Like, can you actually write a name in red or something all this green/black stuff is not helping anybody. By not having an opinion you make it easier for scum not to have an opinion either which is bad. We want their opinions so we can hold them up against them later if they start becoming irrational.
@Nisan201 Why don't you make any sense at all?
Things you've said that do not make sense in my brain:
1: prplhz is a good scumhunter. I doubt you believe this because it's not true. I'm like maybe mid gold league and I've never played well in any game you've been in and I've never seen you in any observer QT.
2: You have not been vocal or decided to have any thread presence because 1, yet you don't really act like you truly believe 1. You didn't support me in ANYTHING this whole game. I would actually have pushed you day2 but I thought it would be weird to shoot sinani206 and then push Nisani201. No idea where I got this idea from.
3: You only ever do anything when called out. Your cases on BaronFel and [UoN]Sentinel are like, meh, you could have pushed those at any point in this game because they took you maybe 2 minutes to write up. I've seen you do a lot better but in this game you don't seem to really give a damn.
And can't you at least make up some bullshit reason for not giving us sinani201? He was so obvious and you've played with him more and know him better than anybody else here. I had to read through of his games (I didn't count SEVEN FUCKING TEEN by the way) night1 but you were in all those, why didn't you give us sinani201?
|
@prplhz
You said you killed sinani, no one countered the claim, my suspicion was already easing up on you, so I really had no reason to think you weren't who you claimed to be (vig).
@Nisani
I lurked for most of the game, I think everyone has agreed with that. I'm trying to be more active, but I really only post when I have something I can contribute (even if it's just an opinion/feeling about someone).
I don't see how trying to be impartial is a bad thing? We could've tried to play this game with random lynchings and gone with our gut, but most people are trying to logically post. If I was impartial, that would mean I would look over someones argument just cause I didn't agree with them at the start...
Funny enough, that was the main reason I was looking at Sinensis, I didn't think he was logical/partial enough.
@Bluelightz
Sorry, I'm trying to post more, and wanted to let you know that I intended to post (which explains why I told you I'd be back later). The second I have a very strong suspicion of someone, I will come out and say it. So far, I've felt like Vilonis on d1, and prplhz after n1 were townies. I haven't had super strong conviction on any scum, but I thought Sinensis was hurting our chances by listing off random (or it felt random at least) other members.
And as I said, I try to avoid repeating what someone has said, even if I agree on point with what they've said.
I never said Toast was suspicious, I said he can be aggressive, which can throw people off or give himself false heat (people will respond in kind and try to get blame onto him). I was saying, even though he can be aggressive, i wasn't going to vote for him unless I heard better reasoning.
@Sentinel
I voted for Timeaisis because it was obvious Sinensis (my original suspect) was not going to get voted, and we only had a short amount of time left (~2 or so hours I think). I know we wanted to get a vote in, and so out of the two suspects, I felt Timeaisis was the most suspicious.
I'm sure you can find in my history I voted for Sinensis day 1, and repeated my suspicions of him...
---
I'm going to keep with my original suspicion and vote Nisani. I think his posts today have made me more suspicious of him (even if he didn't have me as the second target). It feels as though he knows his argument against us isn't that strong and so he's trying to quickly push the votes and focus on to someone else since he knows people were looking at him n2.
##Vote: Nisani201
|
@BaronFel Why is it scummy that he's trying to get focus onto someone else? Why would a townie not do this and why would a scum do it?
|
Out of the 3 Nulls, BaronFel & Nisani201 are suspicious. BaronFel could easily be town though.
I'm going to vote Nisani for now.
Why?
1). Because he has contributed little.
2).Because he's been lurking and as prp pointed out he only comes back when he's called out
##Vote: Nisani201
|
@Bluelightz
Why is BaronFel suspicious?
|
@prp as I said in my short analysis on 1 of his post's, he is lurking hardcore, barely helped town. But, the way he post's is doesnt seem scummy, so he could also easily be town though.
I'm in school btw so my post's will be random for now
|
On February 09 2012 08:09 prplhz wrote:
@Bluelightz Who do you want to lynch? Like, can you actually write a name in red or something all this green/black stuff is not helping anybody. By not having an opinion you make it easier for scum not to have an opinion either which is bad. We want their opinions so we can hold them up against them later if they start becoming irrational.
@Nisan201 Why don't you make any sense at all?
Things you've said that do not make sense in my brain:
1: prplhz is a good scumhunter. I doubt you believe this because it's not true. I'm like maybe mid gold league and I've never played well in any game you've been in and I've never seen you in any observer QT.
2: You have not been vocal or decided to have any thread presence because 1, yet you don't really act like you truly believe 1. You didn't support me in ANYTHING this whole game. I would actually have pushed you day2 but I thought it would be weird to shoot sinani206 and then push Nisani201. No idea where I got this idea from.
3: You only ever do anything when called out. Your cases on BaronFel and [UoN]Sentinel are like, meh, you could have pushed those at any point in this game because they took you maybe 2 minutes to write up. I've seen you do a lot better but in this game you don't seem to really give a damn.
And can't you at least make up some bullshit reason for not giving us sinani201? He was so obvious and you've played with him more and know him better than anybody else here. I had to read through of his games (I didn't count SEVEN FUCKING TEEN by the way) night1 but you were in all those, why didn't you give us sinani201?
1. You landed a vig shot on Sinani on N1.
2. This is a defect in my town play. Look at any of my games and you'll see that it's natural for me to be somewhat lurky/less vocal.
3. See #2
I will be writing an analysis on Sentinel later today (or tomorrow if I don't have enough time). I agree that I haven't been as active as I should be but that will change.
|
On February 09 2012 07:51 prplhz wrote:
@EchelonTee Why do you care whether I push Nisani201 or not today? I asked you who you want to lynch and you don't even answer "Nisani201" because then I would be able to follow you, but instead you answer that you don't really know. At the beginning of day3 you of all people in this game don't know who to lynch. What the hell is that about?
You sounded very sure that you wanted to push Nisani, but then voted with him, so I was confused; it doesn't seem so strange now that I think about why you would do that. Why do you want to "follow" me? I've been producing shit reads; I don't want to be hasty with this.
I really don't understand Bluelightz posting style, and Toast hasn't posted as much as I thought he was going to. It's 2AM right now and I feel terrible; I know I said I was going to post meaty shiz tonight but I just can't. I'll do it tomorrow early as possible.
On February 09 2012 07:18 prplhz wrote:
Can people please vote for the person they currently think should be lynched. If town just sits around instead of committing then we can't force scum to commit either.
##Vote: [UoN]Sentinel
|
On February 09 2012 11:54 Bluelightz wrote:
@prp as I said in my short analysis on 1 of his post's, he is lurking hardcore, barely helped town. But, the way he post's is doesnt seem scummy, so he could also easily be town though.
I'm in school btw so my post's will be random for now
you've barely been helping town too. why should anyone think that you're innocent? you've displayed scummy traits; only reason you were passed over was that other people were acting worse.
|
Oh, missed that Toast said he would be busy until tomorrow. mbad
On February 09 2012 08:55 BaronFel wrote:
@Nisani
[...]
I don't see how trying to be impartial is a bad thing? We could've tried to play this game with random lynchings and gone with our gut, but most people are trying to logically post. If I was impartial, that would mean I would look over someones argument just cause I didn't agree with them at the start...
Funny enough, that was the main reason I was looking at Sinensis, I didn't think he was logical/partial enough.
?? This doesn't make sense at all. I think you don't know what impartial means..? "Going with our gut" =/= partiality, and being against someone's character =/= impartiality... Nisani is referring to the fact that you haven't been making hard stands on people, do you have anything to say about that?
Nisani's point is funny though:
On February 08 2012 12:53 Nisani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2012 23:02 BaronFel wrote:
After looking through Nisani201's filter, I think he's rather suspicious (short posts, didn't explain his decisions much). He's probably my main suspect at this point.
Mderg seems like a townie to me, or at least rather logical.
EchelonTee is rather aggressive, but I don't think that makes him more suspicious than Nisani201 at this point.
gotta go to work, but I'll be back later tonight Also make me think he's scum. He tries to be as impartial as possible with everything.
Doesn't BaronFel's post look a lot like:
On February 08 2012 06:58 mderg wrote:
Just a general not that well reasoned list of reads:
Bluelightz IMO rather town than scum, not safe to assume, though
EchelonTee IMO suspicious but no serious suspicion
TheToast IMO rather town than scum but not confirmed
Nisani201 IMO rather scum than town, my first target
[UoN]Sentinel IMO hard to imagine as scum
BaronFel IMO not cleared my feeling tells me that he´s town
prplhz pretty much confirmed town
I really want to see your case on Sentinel, but your case on BF is just saying he is newbie lurker, a counterpart of how you're an experienced/abrasive lurker. Take your stance on Sentinel, if you actually have one.
|
I'm back guys, anyway to start some discussion
What do you guys think of BaronFel & [UoN]Sentinel?Are they town?Are they scum?
I'm also going to share my thoughts on them aswell
|
@prplhz
By itself it may not be suspicious, but the night before his name was being said a lot, and then today he seems really jumpy put the focus on to others rather then defending himself. That just makes him more suspicious to me. Perhaps its the wrong feeling to have but that's just my take on it.
|
United States22154 Posts
About 12 hours left in the day! [UoN]Sentinel is currently leading, but no one has a majority yet!
|
Right now,
BaronFel could easily be Town, the way he post's his opinions make me think he is town for now.
Sentinel, could be town as well, looking at this post is what makes me have mixed opinions on him.
On February 07 2012 07:14 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:I wish I were. Maybe then I could have some fun.
That's the end of it. I will be available somewhere around 3 hours before the deadline and be here for aroun d30 minutes maybe, but can't be sure :/
|
On February 09 2012 22:38 BaronFel wrote:
@prplhz
By itself it may not be suspicious, but the night before his name was being said a lot, and then today he seems really jumpy put the focus on to others rather then defending himself. That just makes him more suspicious to me. Perhaps its the wrong feeling to have but that's just my take on it.
If the act in itself may not be suspicious, what made you more suspicious of him? Can you get more text-wally, maybe write a bigger post on him, and I don't necessarily mean post-by-post-analysis, but try to make this "feeling", this "take on it" that you have more understandable to other townies.
What is your take on the night hits so far? Vilonis night1, mderg night2, why didn't they hit TheToast or EchelonTee or you or me? How do you think TheToast and EchelonTee has acted today? What is your "feeling" and "take" on them?
|
|
|
Dunno who I'll vote, I'm just spamming now really 'cause I think it would be a shame if day3 ended on page 27.
|
On February 10 2012 00:23 Bluelightz wrote:Right now, BaronFel could easily be Town, the way he post's his opinions make me think he is town for now. Sentinel, could be town as well, looking at this post is what makes me have mixed opinions on him. Show nested quote +On February 07 2012 07:14 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On February 07 2012 06:34 prplhz wrote:
You the last scum [UoN]Sentinel? I wish I were. Maybe then I could have some fun. That's the end of it. I will be available somewhere around 3 hours before the deadline and be here for aroun d30 minutes maybe, but can't be sure :/
do you realize that saying everyone is green is GOOD for mafia?? are you intentionally or unintentionally avoiding the topic of who you want to lynch.
|
@Bluelightz face it, scum isn't showing anything promising and this game's got more lurkers than a brood war ZvT. Sometimes we need jokes to keep ourselves sane.
Sorry prplhz, no quadruple post for you.
|
@Nisani you've been promising to write your analysis for maybe 2 days now? Where is this magic analysis?
Until then, to accelerate the process,
##Vote: Nisani201
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
