Pretty much everything you said about Tyrran (passivity, lack of confidence in his reads, overall disinterest in the lynches) applied to risk as well. Can you point out what made risk look like a townie (?) to you?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 19:44 GMT

#1362

Besides you didn't "defend" risk or push Tyrran. You made a few posts stating on your opinion on the lynches (it sounded like you were ok with risk lynch). Who are the "other players" in the game you would have lynched over risk, besides Tyrran?

Overall I don't have a problem with your posting. The issue I have is that if you aren't AoD, why did they risk shooting me last night if I was likely going to be leading another mislynch?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 19:49 GMT

#1363

None of those posts demonstrate the things you were talking about and aggression against the person who is pushing to lynch you isn't particularly a townie trait. He didn't sound like a vt who was about to be lynched while town was still in a good position. That day one "phew I escaped a lynch" post sounded forced or at best null. He didn't make your top 5 most likely to be scum? You said you would vote for him over RoL at least. Who were your top 5 reads over risk and why didn't you talk about them?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 19:56 GMT

#1365

And yes, he was completely disinterested in the lynch on day 2. That seemed particularly damning; I even had to ask him 3 times until I got his opinion on Tyrran out of him and even then the answer was

I don't think I'm willing to lynch him just yet. But that could change, I'm not going to say I can't be talked into lynching him so he can just lurk the entire day safely.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 20:05 GMT

#1366

Anyway, don't take this to mean you I consider you a good lynch based on your actual posting. I think you've sufficiently explained why you disliked the lynch and I mostly agree with what you've said about other players. I'm merely questioning you due to the fact no townies dies on night 1 and we were blocked.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 20:14 GMT

#1369

On January 12 2012 05:06 Dirkzor wrote:

Show nested quote +

That Risk wrote that made him less suspicious in my book then Tyrrans "Yes risk is scum lets lynch him" post. Tyrran just wanted another one to be lynched while risk actually took a stance. A stance that was also contradicting to the generel feeling in the thread. That is to me more townie then what Tyrran did.

It came very late, basically when risk was already doomed and only after he had waffled quite a bit. I suppose the one thing that might have allowed me to get away from the lynch was assuming that no scum mates would play that poorly.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 20:41 GMT

#1372

Tyrran post a case on someone you would like to be lynched tomorrow and it can't be Jackal and it can't be copy/pasted material like everything else you've said so far.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 20:51 GMT

#1374

No, I meant during the night. That is to say on Thursday as it's relatively late in France.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 12 2012 06:13 GMT

#1387

Oh look the thread has been basically dead for 9 hours. Grackaroni you said you would have more time today and you made one post.

RoL all your posts have been about the dumb plan of yours in one way or another. Thanks for joining the game if you are town. No the fact you are busy does not excuse you at all. You'll have another stretch of 24 hours of inactivity soon.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 12 2012 06:38 GMT

#1389

Are you going to give us your opinion on anything besides RoL? You are basically another Jackal by this point

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 12 2012 14:32 GMT

#1396

I actually agree that it's strange that he was so bothered about being sent into purgatory. It's even more suspicious when you combine this with his lack of suspicion on me. He was also not so subtly pushing the idea that he may blue. All these point towards him not wanting to be jailed again.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 12 2012 17:56 GMT

#1404

I can't believe I somehow had missed this

On January 10 2012 15:05 Blazinghand wrote:

Show nested quote +

Both of those guys are also scum so it's not really useful to talk to them

On January 10 2012 15:15 Blazinghand wrote:
I think risk is scum and I need to read tyrran's filter

So first you called them both scum and then 10 minutes later you have to read Tyrran's filter to answer. You never posted your thoughts on Tyrran after that. You have done absolutely nothing in the last few days. I'd read the rest of your filter but it's a bit too taunting to bother right now, but just the above peculiarity is starting to make me wonder if your scum play too resembles that of WBGs.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 12 2012 18:27 GMT

#1407

Oh another instant delurker. Your case is incredibly bad whether RoL is scum or not and thus it's extremely difficult to believe your confidence is genuine

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 12 2012 18:30 GMT

#1410

You hadn't read tyrran's filter, but you called him scum. You still haven't read his filter, but you call him scum.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 12 2012 21:54 GMT

#1446

I think he is likely mafia by this point, though probably not the absolutely best lynch. I do not think he is mafia due to the awful plan, but rather for being otherwise completely worthless and disinterested. I imagine Grackaroni, cwave, spaackle, tyrran, Jackal is scum infested too. Jackal's tone is okay, and that is usually the easiest way to spot his scum play, but he is still just lurking and tunnelling a different person every day.

Pretty much impossible to tell what bluelightz is; I even tried to look at his non-mafia posts to see if he could really act like this as town but there were none. I suppose the fact he is always making himself available to questions is something. I haven't put any effort into the game today and thus haven't reread the filters to see what would make sense in terms of connections.

While I'm not going to bother reading Blazing's filter, I'm just going to assume that his mafia play wouldn't look like this, despite how little sense he makes. Also someone who I'm just going to start ignoring every game.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 12 2012 22:32 GMT

#1455

For the record, I do not want to survive the night

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 12 2012 23:49 GMT

#1472

HoD you asked Grackaroni, Spaackle and Cwave for their scum reads and they mostly didn't materialize. Do you not care? You have been quite detached from the game; certainly not one I would characterize as someone who attempts to produce information and then do something with it. Indeed you seem to put most of your efforts into defending yourself or arguing about irrelevant game mechanics/strategy issues.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 12 2012 23:53 GMT

#1478

Limited time and instantly delurk

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 13 2012 00:14 GMT

#1496

Just like we could hold you to this?

I will get out my analysis before the day post tomorrow, hopefully I can get some done before work tomorrow, but if not after 6pm EST I will be home trying to get some shit done.

Day ends in 50 minutes

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 13 2012 00:22 GMT

#1504

On January 13 2012 09:18 Grackaroni wrote:

Show nested quote +

It shouldn't be all that hard really. He's done nothing but flip-flop on RoL. Scum buddies??

So what happened to all your free time on Wednesday? I'm sure I know the reason but I'm curious about the answer