Zephirdd: you don't assume stupid things just because they are possible. Read my filter and tell me if it looks like scum play; it does not. I even suggested that the channeler should use its power to protect likely n1 targets, which would be ridiculously bad if I was the angel of death. Thus you should either conclude that they tried to hit me or HoD is the angel. The former likely implies that there was a reason for angels to want me dead, which implicates risk/tyrran.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 10 2012 15:19 GMT

#1202

On January 10 2012 23:34 risk.nuke wrote:

Show nested quote +

This means nothing, quite obviously if you were scum you would act like you played pro town.

This is perhaps the single most scummiest thing I've seen on TL Mafia. Lynch this scum please

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 10 2012 16:27 GMT

#1210

On January 11 2012 01:24 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Lol, are you guys retarded? I am gone for a day and you guys go batshit stupid and try to lynch me? I have work until 6pm but when I get back whoever the fuck is pushing this is getting reamed and I will finally get on my analysis game that I have been meaning to do.

We aren't lynching you, we are lynching risk who will flip scum. Relax

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 10 2012 16:38 GMT

#1219

Cwave your "#1 lynch" is now leading in votes so I assume that you will now happily switch!

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 10 2012 18:29 GMT

#1234

Explain what? That's what every single scum says once they run out of options. There is no downside to saying that. You escape the lynch for another day and possibly out the DT.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 12:27 GMT

#1302

Cwave you still haven't voted for your #1 scum read. Are you going to?

We need 2 to hammer risk, the wait is killing me

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 12:32 GMT

#1307

So are you going to explain why it took this long for you to actually vote for #1 read instead of your #2 read? Don't go anywhere, I expect a reasonable explanation

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 12:40 GMT

#1309

But yesterday rather than arguing why your #1 should be lynched, you just wagoned RoL presumably because he had more votes. Then you disappeared and ignored my requests to move your vote, despite risk suddenly looking like a much more viable lynch and lynch viability was presumably the reason why you voted for RoL instead. You haven't been discussing anything for the last 40 hours.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 12:56 GMT

#1311

But you also had no problem with voting RoL, weren't you afraid of hammer then? If you were so afraid of someone being hammered, wouldn't just voting for your #1 read in the first place make sense?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 13:06 GMT

#1313

That didn't answer my question, but that's fine because there is no explanation for your actions. The question is whether you didn't want to vote for him because he is your scum buddy or because you are a townie who makes no sense at all.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 13:37 GMT

#1315

I do not make stuff up. That is not an acceptable explanation, unless that somehow means that your #1 lynch isn't really your #1 lynch, in which case you can argue that it makes some sense.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 15:03 GMT

#1326

Alright, first of all I will never admit that was a poor lynch. Risk did no scum hunting at all following his single case post, which itself was suspicious, on day 1 and his defense made no sense at all. Further, a bunch of people acted suspiciously when asked for the opinion on him and Tyrran/Cwave refused to touch the lynch on two days.

The fact I was wrong likely means that I was not hit on day 1, which significantly increases the likelihood of HoD being the angel of death. I will have to consider something.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 15:08 GMT

#1327

You are right Jackal that hammer post was quite suspicious and uncharacteristic of you. The content, not the fact you hammered.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 15:12 GMT

#1328

Bluelightz it's impossible to tell if you are another sinani, scum or both. This game is getting quite frustrating due to abundance of players who aren't making sense, doing anything or even posting in a manner that allows me to even attempt to guess their alignment.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 15:21 GMT

#1331

You are one of the people who don't make sense. Palmar flipped demon.

I think it's very likely that at least some of the people who were reluctant to touch risk lynch are scum. There was nothing redeeming about his play and it looked almost completely different than in every other game he has played. Even worse, the reasons these people gave for not wanting to lynch him were wholly inadequate.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 15:28 GMT

#1335

I'm tempted to propose lynching anyone apologizing to risk without even looking at their filters. Very rarely would I consider a mislynch unavoidable, but this is one of those cases.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 15:37 GMT

#1336

Harbingerofdoom posted this day 1

Are people seriously trying to implicate me on the basis of "soft-defending" risk by voting Erandorr instead? Now, I can't speak for the people throwing suspicion on me, but I sure as hell don't know risk's alignment, and unless they somehow do, I don't see how it can be implicate me as being scum. Anyone trying to implicate me on this before risk flips is using shitty logic. If risk flips scum and then you want to come after me, then you have some logic on your side. I did not vote for risk nor comment on it much as I had (and still have) a null read on risk. Risk has been in every game I've played on here, and his play-style has varied too much from game to game for me to be comfortable with a day 1 read on him.

This sounds as if you knew he was going to flip town. I suppose the problem with that is that he could still have flipped the other scum team.

Grackaroni you have basically stopped playing. Another player who clearly does not care about the game at all.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 15:50 GMT

#1339

Almost instant delurk doesn't exactly point towards you having been busy today.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 16:25 GMT

#1345

Because he was going to be lynched anyway and it appears that the night is accordingly longer? Considering that I personally would have liked to hammer yesterday, I wouldn't read too much into that. Jackal's tone however seems off though. Specifically his random apology. Did he apologize to erandorr yesterday? No. Does he ever apologize when lynching someone? I doubt it.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 11 2012 16:39 GMT

#1347

Polite and lurking jackal is far more likely to be scum jackal. His play so far has constituted of picking a target to tunnel and then basically doing nothing else and posting quite little. I wouldn't even consider it out of the question that he is a demon because Jackal tunnelling someone usually won't get the target lynched and people expect him to tunnel palmar every game.

Mafia are much more likely to post something unnatural when hammering due to their inherent guilt