Purgatory Mafia - Page 46

On January 09 2012 04:06 syllogism wrote:

This is palmar scum claiming. He has been trolling for a while now but this is as close at is gets

On January 09 2012 04:30 syllogism wrote:
You are still pretending that the case against risk was purely meta and it most certainly was not. You are repeating the same misrepresentations that risk used, making you look worse. Moreover the case against Erandorr was pure meta and you were fine with voting for him based on just that. A lot of things were even said about risk.nuke since you made that post. What do you think about him now?

Anyway, we will certainly want to see risk flip first and you have a chance to step up regardless, but I do believe your stance regarding risk nuke has been suspicious

On January 09 2012 04:18 Dirkzor wrote:


If I had written that would you take that as scum claiming?

On January 09 2012 04:45 Dirkzor wrote:
See, all i have is your word for it.

But i guess we can lynch him and if he flips town we lynch you...

On January 09 2012 04:45 Dirkzor wrote:
See, all i have is your word for it.

But i guess we can lynch him and if he flips town we lynch you...

On January 09 2012 04:32 syllogism wrote:

No, but you aren't a player who I talk extensively about the game, in and out of the game. It's extremely unlikely that he would say that as town and I'm pretty sure that when he wrote that he knew very well how it would look like to me; he has by this point realized that there is little he can do to avoid being lynched so might as well have some fun.

On January 09 2012 04:16 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
Are people seriously trying to implicate me on the basis of "soft-defending" risk by voting Erandorr instead?

-HoD makes it 6-6 risk/eran with just over 3 hours to go to avoid a no lynch he votes for Eran which makes 6-6 whilst a risk vote would have made it 7-5
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=13044935

On January 09 2012 04:45 Dirkzor wrote:
See, all i have is your word for it.

But i guess we can lynch him and if he flips town we lynch you...

On January 09 2012 04:57 layabout wrote:

Well..
i made a slight error here (RoL had said he would vote for erandor here but he never voted)

Erandor had four votes when HoD voted: Grackaroni, Blazinghand, Tyrran and Cwave
Risk.nuke had 6 votes:syllogism, Refallen, Dirkzor, Zephirdd, layabout, Erandorr,
@HoD
your primary reasoning was to that to avoid a no-lynch you would vote for Erandorr because you were "fine with lynching him"
in light of all of the pressure of risk.nuke why didn't you comment on it?
if you wanted to avoid the no-lynch why did you vote Erandorr rather than voting for risk, who had the most votes?

Where is the active and opinionated and aggressive risk.nuke of Election mafia who posted a lot and certainly didn't just repeat what others had said, right or wrong?

@risk.nuke
Last game I played with you you were extremely aggressive early on. This game you haven't attacked anyone yet, or even directly addressed someone. Any particular reason why you were active and aggressive last time, and are thus far being passive this game?

On November 17 2011 01:24 risk.nuke wrote:
##Vote Forumite

I'm not okey with you not responding to a direct vote against you.

On November 17 2011 02:21 risk.nuke wrote:

Neither and both. You're FoSing two people on nothing. And then there is a similar thing on Sabini. Add to that letting the vote on you slip by without a hint of defense from your side. I don't know what you are doing but it is not pro-town play and that is why I vote for you.

On November 17 2011 06:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Okey, but isn't this exacly one of those situations where we connected two people and should not lynch both of them incase they are town.

##Vote Kenpachi

On November 17 2011 06:47 risk.nuke wrote:

If kenpachi is green, then lanaia probably isn't scum.
If kenpachi is red we got a scumkill even if that doesn't necessarily mean lanaia is his buddy.

If lanai is green that means nothing for kenpachis alignment.
If lanai is red then kenpachi is scum.

I think we learn more from knowing kenpachis alignment.

On January 09 2012 04:50 risk.nuke wrote:

Imo a town Palmar would respond to that with a pretty huge post declaring why the plan is dumb alternativly if he approved of the plan he would write additional thoughts or/and reason further why it is a good plan.

On January 09 2012 05:29 Spaackle wrote:
@RofL While I agree that we need a plan for day 2, yours is not the one I would go with. Mass claiming like that will only paint a target on our blues for the scumteams. We'll lose our blue powers so fast that we'll get almost no use out of them, and where will we be then?

@risk


I thought you hated meta arguments?

On January 09 2012 05:23 layabout wrote:
Fun fact: risk nuke was agressive day 1 in steamship

assertive vote for a clear reason

attacks Forumite for a reason


throws around his vote


gives some reasoning


makes his second vote because of sinani's vote
(kenpachi and sinani got lynched and both flipped blue, risk was town)
So i actually this compared to this game risk nuke was aggressiv in attacking players even if he was relatively inactive.

So your meta reason is bollocks

throws around his vote

Also, if you were in this game, you would know that calling this his vote being "thrown around" is the farthest thing from the truth.

On January 09 2012 05:02 Dirkzor wrote:
Oh I love your cases Jackal. Oh well thought out and in depth they are.

/Sarcasm end

Eventually he became aggressive, but he wasn't right off the bat. If my meta reason is bollocks, then what, did I magically post that in a prior game to cover my ass in this one? Don't be dense.

Also, if you were in this game, you would know that this is his vote being "thrown around" is the farthest thing from the truth.