|
On December 05 2011 06:20 Zephirdd wrote:Show nested quote +On December 05 2011 06:08 redFF wrote:
radfield what do you think of palmar, you seem to have ignored my case on him which is the only coherent case in the thread so far.
what do people think of corrupt stating "so many suspicious people already" and then when asked who, stalled for a while before only listing 1/2 players?
Zephirdd's non vote then vote after i pushed him also strikes me as scummy. I don't like his answers at all. It's like he only answers exactly what he was asked for, and then finds a reason to lurk away(his last post exactly). If we are pushing for a day 1 lynch and there is no better target, I'd say we should lynch him. He is either bad newbie scum, or really really really bad newbie town. I'm inclined to the former. And for the record, I'd have voted him right after his first answer if you hadn't convinced me to vote on him beforehand. It's just that I don't feel very comfortable to do that, but it's not like it was a really big deal anyway.
why not?
|
@vader, can you read the thread or not?
Windows 60% done and then I can read the thread.
but you have posts discussing things that are happening in the thread
|
if corrupt is scum zepirdd could be his buddy
but otherwise i find On December 05 2011 06:26 Zephirdd wrote:Show nested quote +On December 05 2011 06:21 redFF wrote:On December 05 2011 06:20 Zephirdd wrote:On December 05 2011 06:08 redFF wrote:
radfield what do you think of palmar, you seem to have ignored my case on him which is the only coherent case in the thread so far.
what do people think of corrupt stating "so many suspicious people already" and then when asked who, stalled for a while before only listing 1/2 players?
Zephirdd's non vote then vote after i pushed him also strikes me as scummy. I don't like his answers at all. It's like he only answers exactly what he was asked for, and then finds a reason to lurk away(his last post exactly). If we are pushing for a day 1 lynch and there is no better target, I'd say we should lynch him. He is either bad newbie scum, or really really really bad newbie town. I'm inclined to the former. And for the record, I'd have voted him right after his first answer if you hadn't convinced me to vote on him beforehand. It's just that I don't feel very comfortable to do that, but it's not like it was a really big deal anyway. why not? As I said, I don't like to vote before at least an answer. Many people did that on Steamship Liquidia, and even as scum that bothered me, even having an argument with chaoser and almost getting caught over that. But I guess it's fine when it is a deadline-style lynch instead of a hammer-style lynch game.
an acceptable response.
|
|
|
On December 05 2011 08:09 Radfield wrote:
Redff is being aggressive, and I like it.
![[image loading]](http://i54.tinypic.com/dwdv1x.jpg)
|
he's pretending to reaction fish
|
@annul he said "so many suspicious people already."
then only said one person, and was unable to list anymore. I'm not misrepresenting anything.
|
[QUOTE]On December 05 2011 10:01 Refallen wrote:
[quote]
I agree with redFF's analysis for the most part, and I especially found it weird that Palmar proposed the no-day lynch, which indicates him to be maybe scum. However, I'm not sure how far Palmar posting "useless" stuff would go in proving he was scum; from what I read of XLVII (admittedly the only time I saw Palmar play), he just likes to post huge amounts of text, whether it might be immediately useful or not; seems to me he's just throwing his thoughts out there, hardly a scum tell.
[/QUOTE]
good that my case isn't on him posting huge amounts of text.
|
|
|
prplz what do you think of the palmar case?
|
oh, meh i guess it kinda nullifies my first 2 points. i still feel the case is strong enough without those 2.
|
i wont be able to post very much tomorrow until about 5 hours before lynch.
|
On December 05 2011 13:11 Soap wrote:
I don't get day start, no one did nothing and we have nothing to analyze. I'm rnging.
##Vote Drazerk
jesus christ we have 19 pages
|
On December 05 2011 13:26 Refallen wrote:
Yeah uh, let's not vote people for no reason
why are you voting soap?
|
annul are you sure scum would do what soap did?
|
give me some scum motivations for soap's post.
|
get away with not contributing i guess..but he must know he would be called out.
|
haha
he made this post
On November 26 2011 10:44 Soap wrote:
Ugh, there's so little information and scum are free to bury any tell under piles of nonsense and fingerpointing, as I'm sure it's being done. This will be most valuable in retrospective and I feel town should simulate a close vote to entice mafia to root for their candidate(s), but Palmer flew away in the popularity contest. So I'm protest voting for sinani206.
on page 68 of xlvii, and he was town.
|
if anything refallen looks scummy for jumping on an easy vote.
|
On December 05 2011 14:30 Refallen wrote:
I haven't been "jumping on easy votes" at all, I didn't agree with Palmar/Corrupt and said so, and I also laid out my reasoning why I thought Soap was scum. Obviously, I wasn't aware of prior metagame history which makes me think that he isn't so scummy anymore.
On December 05 2011 13:26 Refallen wrote:
Yeah uh, let's not vote people for no reason
you didn't lay out your reasoning.
mighty defensive after a little suspicion aren't you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
