EPT/in if there's room
TL Mafia XLVIII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
/in if there's room | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
cybercheese also healed me and i was scum  | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 04 2011 22:07 Radfield wrote: Of course not  I don't expect you to think I am town based on me saying so. I expect you to watch my play and gradually exclude me from being scum based on merit. or just autolynch you if you don't die night 1 | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
Palmar looks kinda scummy right now. ##Vote Palmar | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 05 2011 02:00 prplhz wrote: @redFF What motivation could there be for a townie to propose a no-lynch this early on day1 in a closed setup? Do you think TruthBringer is bad enough not to be able to figure this out himself? Why do you think Palmar looks kinda scummy right now? yes | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 04 2011 19:38 Palmar wrote: posts useless listSup. If we assume the hosts went with the most obvious way of balancing the game, two people out of this list are scum: Radfield Palmar Jackal sandroba syllogism redFF However I would never agree with lynching based on how we perceive the hosts balance games. They could just as well have randomized it or used some other method to balance it. the very next thing he says basically calls the list uselessWhat I'm more interested in is that 6/25 seems like an oddly high number of mafia for a normal setup. Do you think this is offset by lower mafia KP or multiple town power roles? I'm not sure what the point of this question is. Nobody (except maybe scum) knows for sure. It's pointless setup speculation to look like contributing with a hint of rolefishing.In addition, how would you feel about randomly lynching on day 1. I mean completely random, we just have some kinda rng generator choose our lynch for the day. I'm fairly sure this isn't going to happen, dumb idea. Besides we could never trust the person generating the number to not influence it themselves in some way. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 04 2011 22:42 Palmar wrote: Annoying may not be the word you use, but just think about our last game as town together where I was running for mayor. Your approach towards me is not the same. he says syllo's play is different from his last game as town. It's being suspicious of him without actually saying anything concrete, this is how scum start wagons without anyone noticing they started it. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 05 2011 02:51 Palmar wrote: I'm out for the night redFF's case is terrible. VisceraEyes's agreement is a proof it's terrible. I'll explain why tomorrow, don't have time now. hey at least its a case instead of pointless setup discussion and posts saying obvious things like On December 04 2011 23:09 Palmar wrote: Establishing your innocence is the first priority over anything else. If you scumhunt, you might catch scum If you establish your innocence you won't be lynched. If all townies won't be lynched, then the game has been solved. So yes, that should be syllos and everyone else's main concern. this | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 05 2011 02:56 Corrupt wrote: Wow~ Some sick investigations going on! I think I'm getting paranoid already.. yet it's my first game. (and first post) This is not going to be easy... so many suspicious people already. like who? | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 05 2011 03:05 Zephirdd wrote: Tell us who is suspicious. Even if you want to say "I just think he is suspicious". It's not bad to be transparent, and don't be afraid to make mistakes and even turn back on your own word, as long as you make sense. Unless of course you are scum, only scum is afraid of mistakes. This post is the perfect example of a clueless scum post. all this post does is say what i said 10 minutes earlier in 8 sentences instead of 2 words... | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
If it's the perfect example of a clueless scum post why isn't your vote on him? | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
what do people think of corrupt stating "so many suspicious people already" and then when asked who, stalled for a while before only listing 1/2 players? Zephirdd's non vote then vote after i pushed him also strikes me as scummy. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 05 2011 01:38 annul wrote: "Just want to sit around and wait for power roles to do our job" whoaaaaaaaaaa what i believe what he meant to say was something along the lines of or does town just sit around and wait for power roles to do our(town's) job(finding scum) for us(town) | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 05 2011 06:17 vaderseven wrote: A no Lynch is awful for the reasons stated AND because it makes reading who voted who and why type info null. We need everyone to vote and explain every reason they have for their vote because this the one thing Mafai have to lie about everyday. Even bussing is a lie in a sense. Voting no Lynch is voting to hide relationships, motives, and information. We are not even discussing nolynch until much later on in the game. It is the worst thing we can do day 1 because it gives us no information and mafia free kills. end of discussion. | ||
| ||
