|
On September 20 2011 10:30 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 20 2011 10:14 chaoser wrote:
Also want to say a my bad to prplhz. I'll post my thoughts in a bit, but are you claiming the hit that caused his bodyguard to die or are you just saying sorry for pushing his lynch?
Also if you are as good as other ppl say, you should heve gotten something out of this. I think you could pretty well have guessed chaosers align, or you might be as well mafia stalker as I said before.
|
Yep, pretty much all people have disappeared. My vote is still on Drazerk, and i won't change it unless he's going to defend himself someway. And i hope that all the remaining players think of these cases as well, regardless of what you think of these two.
Chaoser is a safe lynch yes, but i'd be rather lynching scum than 3rd party.
|
On September 28 2011 00:52 Drazerk wrote:
Rayn -
I protected chaoser because I think he's lying about being bulletproof - I even said that the day he claimed. I already explained that I lied about finding the role blocker so Mafia would kill me last night. I didn't know I would survive today and to be honest it would of been better had they killed me. I did my job last night and ill be role blocked tonight so you idiots can lynch me tomorrow.
How do you explain the mafia hit on prplhz when you clearly stated you are protecting him last night? And the fact that you know it was a double hit? These both together makes you look so scummy i can't even explain.
|
On September 28 2011 00:58 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 00:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 00:52 Drazerk wrote:
Rayn -
I protected chaoser because I think he's lying about being bulletproof - I even said that the day he claimed. I already explained that I lied about finding the role blocker so Mafia would kill me last night. I didn't know I would survive today and to be honest it would of been better had they killed me. I did my job last night and ill be role blocked tonight so you idiots can lynch me tomorrow. How do you explain the mafia hit on prplhz when you clearly stated you are protecting him last night? And the fact that you know it was a double hit? These both together makes you look so scummy i can't even explain. medics are clearly told that they protected their target from a hit the previous night. If it was unblockable I wouldn't of gotten that message. It is as simple as that. also I don't think mafia are stupid enough to hit SS and I can probably guess that they hit me unless a vigilante wants to own up to it.
I didn't ask how did you find out that prp was double hit, i want know how are you able to explain it, unless you didn't actually protect him. Would you as mafia hit a guy who is basically claimed bulletproof next night, just becouse you hope it's gonna be a double stack?
|
And becouse you claimed you 100% know it was a double hit, we actually know it was a double hit (or you are lying about protecting him). Anyways it doesn't make sense.
|
[QUOTE]On September 28 2011 01:06 chaoser wrote:
[quote]And the fact that you know it was a double hit?[/quote]
[quote]I didn't ask how did you find out that prp was double hit[/quote]
Clearly you DID ask it...[/QUOTE]
Actually that wasn't supposed to be a question marks there. :D
|
Okay, I try to be as clear as possible.
Facts:
1) You stated youre gonna protect prp at night (by bulletproof i meant that he was able to survive 1 hit becouse you told us so).
2) prp was still killed
3) it was a double hit (you stated it as a first one)
Then:
Why would mafia hit a guy who they know you are gonna protect and not RB you? I could think gollum would still hit him becouse of the reasons i've stated before (and "was strangled" is nearly 100% gollum kill).
Are you saying mafia gambled if gollum is gonna hit prp too? Or are you saying mafia double hitted prp? Or are you lying?
|
For all of you: Why would mafia hit prp and not RB Drazerk, when it's clear Drazerk is gonna protect him? Quite a gamble i say... or Drazerk is scum!
|
On September 26 2011 09:23 heist wrote:
Seriously rayn? Get your vote off him and do some actual searching.
Do you still agree with your statement heist?
|
On September 28 2011 01:28 GreYMisT wrote:
Chaoser hit Prp, the flavor is the same for radfield's death.
I meant the night prp died.
|
On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already.
How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp?
|
On September 28 2011 01:37 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already. How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp? When I say shit, you listen. Drazerk is clear, Kita is scum.
That's what i call a conversation.
|
On September 28 2011 01:38 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already. How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp? I wasn't role blocked because they tried to kill me ( They failed thanks to the second medic ) and they role blocked chaoser who was going to kill one of them last night and possibly reduce them a KP.
To be more clear, why would mafia hit prplhz when they clearly know you are going to protect him, and they clearly know you are not going to be roleblocked?
Could you answer to the actual question please?
|
On September 28 2011 01:43 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 01:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:38 Drazerk wrote:On September 28 2011 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already. How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp? I wasn't role blocked because they tried to kill me ( They failed thanks to the second medic ) and they role blocked chaoser who was going to kill one of them last night and possibly reduce them a KP. To be more clear, why would mafia hit prplhz when they clearly know you are going to protect him, and they clearly know you are not going to be roleblocked?Could you answer to the actual question please? They didn't know I was going to protect him... lol
Of course they did, as you told them before nightkills.
|
On September 28 2011 01:43 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already. How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp? One simple way that might be possible is because they wanted to use their roleblock for me. I was more of a THREAT. They thought I was going to shoot kitaman last night and that would have meant they would be down to 1 KP tonight for sure. So they roleblocked me. Better to protect one of their own than to make sure they 100% kill someone. They then shoot prp and supersoft, knowing that gollum would obviously be going for frodo. They were hoping that they, if there was a protect like drazerk said there would be, would be the later shot when compared to gollum. That way they would get the ring. Obviously gollum was better at timing and got the later shot, getting the ring.
That is imo quite a gamble.
|
On September 28 2011 01:45 Palmar wrote:
Bro!
I'm trying to help you here, drop the Drazerk issue, just kill Kitaman.
Don't hesitate bro, there is a lot of time left for me to make up my mind. Although i may or may not be here when the dayphase ends, so better be answering. Otherwise all the other noobs may fiollow me and youre gonna get lynched.
|
Last 2 sentences were to Drazerk. I fail at formatting.
|
On September 28 2011 01:47 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 01:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:43 chaoser wrote:On September 28 2011 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already. How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp? One simple way that might be possible is because they wanted to use their roleblock for me. I was more of a THREAT. They thought I was going to shoot kitaman last night and that would have meant they would be down to 1 KP tonight for sure. So they roleblocked me. Better to protect one of their own than to make sure they 100% kill someone. They then shoot prp and supersoft, knowing that gollum would obviously be going for frodo. They were hoping that they, if there was a protect like drazerk said there would be, would be the later shot when compared to gollum. That way they would get the ring. Obviously gollum was better at timing and got the later shot, getting the ring. That is imo quite a gamble. And not roleblocking me and letting me potentially kill kitaman/one of their member isn't a gamble? Everything in this game is a gamble. Look at all the stuff mafia has done so far. It's all been gambles. iGrok claiming third party off 3 votes is a HUGE gamble.
That one i'd rather call a stupid gamble.
|
On September 28 2011 01:51 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 01:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:47 chaoser wrote:On September 28 2011 01:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:43 chaoser wrote:On September 28 2011 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already. How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp? One simple way that might be possible is because they wanted to use their roleblock for me. I was more of a THREAT. They thought I was going to shoot kitaman last night and that would have meant they would be down to 1 KP tonight for sure. So they roleblocked me. Better to protect one of their own than to make sure they 100% kill someone. They then shoot prp and supersoft, knowing that gollum would obviously be going for frodo. They were hoping that they, if there was a protect like drazerk said there would be, would be the later shot when compared to gollum. That way they would get the ring. Obviously gollum was better at timing and got the later shot, getting the ring. That is imo quite a gamble. And not roleblocking me and letting me potentially kill kitaman/one of their member isn't a gamble? Everything in this game is a gamble. Look at all the stuff mafia has done so far. It's all been gambles. iGrok claiming third party off 3 votes is a HUGE gamble. That one i'd rather call a stupid gamble. Which one is a stupid gamble? Please post more clearly and not just in one liners. I have a hard time understanding/following your thoughts
Sorry. I think iGrok claiming BALROG was a stupid gamble. And that's why i think mafia realized they need to use more than 1 person to get him at least another day or 2. That's what i'm thinking Radfield, Drazerk and maybe kitaman, or someone else are doing right now.
|
On September 28 2011 02:09 kitaman27 wrote:wherebugsgo, he never left his house.
Why did you track him, he was 90% sure to die night 1?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
