My Little Pony Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 08 2011 05:14 Sevryn wrote: Clearly this is an omgus while trying to apear well reasoned obv scum tell ##vote forumite this kind of tryhard blending into the town is exactly what I would suspect from the SK ##Vote Sevryn | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
THIS IS CHAOS! on that note ##Unvote ##Vote Chaos13 | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
## Vote Honey Badger | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 11 2011 07:20 Forumite wrote: There, there, you´ll get your GM hasn´t confirmed when the game starts, so might be tomorrow. I would like to make a motion to refer to all roles in this game as "Cutie Marks" that is all. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 11 2011 22:47 Forumite wrote: http://mlp.wikia.com/wiki/Doctor_Whooves There are a few other instances where the fans have chimed in and gotten their way, Ditzy Doo is the first one that comes to mind. As for your edited post, I saw it before the edit and I´m glad you removed it. Other fan made ones include Derpy Hooves and DJ Pon-3 | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
By the way for those of you who have not watched the show this video that i shamelessly stole from the MLP thread should be a good sumup. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 12 2011 11:04 wherebugsgo wrote: I see your rainbow dash video and raise you this one (explicit) | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 13 2011 09:15 Forumite wrote: Policy sounds good, although there haven´t been much so far. That´s not the problem I had with your post, my problem was that it seemed like you liked how we had played thus far, when it had been just spam and ponies. Don´t congratulate Town on inactivity and lurking. Ok I see what you mean. How do you feel we should approach this closed setup on day 0/1? | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
maybe making a gameplan based on that is not such a good idea. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Elements of HarmonyNightmare Moon | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Here are the fixed links for those of you who need order in your lives Nightmare moon Elements of Harmony | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 13 2011 22:15 tnkted wrote: Eh, I'm not buying the forumite lynch. His initial statements were pretty lame, but he's been acting like an unjustly accused town since then. I want to shift town conversation back to Greymyst. Now I wanted to wait until after the nightpost to say this, but jackie beat me to it. This is a crazy scummy post. Its sheepy, and its a poor attempt to blend in with everyone, etc. His response to the pressure everyone gave him was this: Not much to say about my post here, as I defended it below. In short I felt this post was a better idea than spam or not posting at all. Okay, lets look at the appeals he makes here. He doesn't try to defend his scummy post at all; instead he appeals to the emotional ("Would you rather I didn't post at all?") and then basically restates his first sentence. This is NOT how you react to pressure. A true townie would read their post and either say, "That wasn't scummy at all!" Or they'd defend themselves and explain what they meant. Greymyst did neither. I have to disagree with you here. How am I not defending myself here? I state the reason behind my post before. The phrase "would you rather I didn't post at all" was not an appeal to emotion, but rather an actual statement of the fact that I feel it is better to post than not at all. Oh, and then the rest of his posts are all about the d1 post and the clues it might contain, which successfully shields him from having to hunt for scum. I have never played a game with clues, so maybe I am overemphasizing their importance to the game, but GMarshal stated that that might give us an insight into game mechanics and the possible settup, which I felt would be pretty important when we dont know either. ## Vote Greymyst | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 14 2011 04:35 wherebugsgo wrote: So you want us to lynch into this list: Lurkers
9.) OriginalName 11.) sinani206 If and only if we don't have a more active, scummy target? Assuming we don't get a more solid target before time runs out, I prefer Sinani206 for the lynch over the other two. Both ON and droneallday have not posted at all since /confirming (with the exception of ON's most recent post about). Both of these players are currently inactive, there is no evidence to suggest they have even read the thread. Sinani on the other hand is currently Lurking. He has a total of 3 posts to his name occurring after the daypost. Here is his Filter. Now lets pick out his posts out of there. On September 13 2011 14:14 sinani206 wrote: Can someone who watches the show explain what Nightmare Moon is? It might be useful to help solve whatever is hidden in the post, something like the roles or numbers of the mafia. A legitimate question for now. However he makes no attempt to analyze the actual post or respond to what others have said. He instead asks a very general question, something scum would do to appear as though they were contributing, and at the same time delay actual efforts at interpreting the post or scumhunting. Thats all he posts for a while until we get to On September 13 2011 23:10 sinani206 wrote: Goddamnit you guys. 7/13 = 53.85% nubs and On September 13 2011 23:10 sinani206 wrote: (it takes 7 to lynch not 8) Again, he posts something of legitimate concern. But it is something that can be found out by one's self, and detracts from discussion much like the above quote regarding the daypost. Around the time of this second set of posts as well, both me and Forumite get FoSed. dispite obviously being around enough to know that we are misunderstanding "majority" he fails to weigh in on either of the cases. sinani is, in the absence of a strong contender, our best lynch at the moment. ##Vote Sinani206 | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 14 2011 09:40 chaos13 wrote: Let's back up the sinani wagon here. Look how fast this built up. Not mafia. And ##unvote Forumite responded like town and there's no way he's gonna be lynched today. My vote is useless on him. I'd hardly call it a wagon, He only had my vote+analysis, and Curu's Vote. What evidence do you have to back up your statement of "Not Mafia?" | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 14 2011 10:49 chaos13 wrote: Ctrl+F sinani on Page 15. You were even talking about him, so I don't know how you could have missed that lol I just did a search for sinani on page 15 and he has not posted there, his name apears14 times on that page, and only in the messages of other people. His last post was (aside from the most recent one on this page where he votes dreamflower for suggesting to lynch lurkers on day1...) found on page 13 of this thread and it was the following On September 13 2011 23:10 sinani206 wrote: (it takes 7 to lynch not 8) Hopefully that will end this senseless tangent. Now Sinani, do you have a better reason for voting dreamflower other than the fact he/she voted for you? Dont say because he/she wants to lynch lurkers because thats something quite a few of us decided might be the best thing to do play a page back. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 14 2011 11:16 sinani206 wrote: This is a pressure vote, to prompt an answer to my question, "Why lynch a lurker if we have a perfectly good other lynch candidate?" I don't understand why other people can pressure vote me, but I can't pressure vote others. I Still fail to see how that is an acceptable reason to vote for someone. Why not ask the thread, "hey why are we going for me instead of X player, when they have done XYZ? instead you vote for a player, and then ask the question. If you were town you would just ask the question I feel, and not feel the need to "pressure vote." as Blue I cant fathom why you would do this. Even as mafia this is putting the spotlight even more on yourself. The only thing I can imagine from this is you are trying to "blend in" by voting for dream for whatever reason, which implies you have something to hide. Now, you said earlier that Forum was our better lynch candidate, Do you have any additional analysis to bring to the table about his actions? In addition, why didn't you vote for him? I am beginning to understand Curu and WBG's position. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 14 2011 10:30 sinani206 wrote: Anyway, I don't think we should have backed off of the pressure on Forumite when we started talking about lurkers. We had a lynch candidate before, but now we want to lynch lurkers. What? Lurkers are supposed to be the last priority lynch. On September 14 2011 13:06 sinani206 wrote: The Forumite lynch is long gone, I was just using that as an example of my point. Lynches aren't dust in the wind, they don't just "go away." If you have additional evidence or analysis on Forumite that would constitute a lynch, I would love to hear it. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Just some thoughts on the situation at the moment. Curu, though abrasive, has actually shown us what a true pressure vote looks like. He comes into the thread with the pretext to policy lynch sinani based on a past game's gameplay, and holy shit look at the responses and information we get to work with. I still think Sinani is our best scum target at the moment for the following reasons. Consider the similar situation at the start of the game, with Chaos13 instantly voting for jackal. in what way did jackal respond? simply with an "lol" and goes on to explain the context of that lynch in a later post. Now, in what way did sinani respond to similar pressure? He first responds by deflecting attention to dreamflower for wanted to lynch lurkers. I posted analysis already but the following post is one I am interested in. On September 14 2011 12:51 sinani206 wrote: Forumite. Curu, you're a fucking idiot by the way. I just want you to die ASAP. ##Unvote ##Vote: Curu this is pure emotion, no logic or rational exists behind this post from a town perspective. If sinani was town why not say when the vote happened to him "yea he is voting for me because I played badly in Ace's game, I will focus and do better this game." that seems much more townie to me. Here is his goodbye post from Ace's game, in which he was town. On September 12 2011 14:48 sinani206 wrote: sorry im terrible gg In this he acknowledges his play was subpar. Therefore he would know the reason that curu is voting for him at the start of this game. a town sinani would not take this as much of a threat. however a scum sinani would see this as a very serious concern. what if curu tunnels me? what if i slip up? This is the sinani we have seen this game. One that is most certainty not town aligned. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Not much has changed since the last time I posted earlier this afternoon. I think dreamflower summed up a few of my thoughts about the sinani lynch quite nicely. I still think him to be our best target today. Jackal, Tnkted, Chaos, and Nishani you are all voting for outliers at the moment. Please look over the sinani lynch, in particular my and dream's posts, and let us know why you feel lynching him is not a good idea, and why your targets are better. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
WBG, thanks for being one of the few to actually respond to my request for reasoning. I am still more convinced that Sinani is a better lynch, but I will admit Tnktned has caught my eye as well. Mostly due to the way in which he has been throwing votes around like confetti this entire day 1. Lets take a journey down memory lane shall we? On September 13 2011 22:15 tnkted wrote: ## Vote Greymyst On September 14 2011 03:46 tnkted wrote: ## Unvote ## Vote OriginalName On September 14 2011 09:56 tnkted wrote: ## Unvote OriginalName ## Vote Curu On September 14 2011 22:04 tnkted wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote: Dreamflower Of course I have taken these votes out of context, but this should help you see what I mean. I will reiterate, I feel tnkted is scummy, however I still feel sinani is a strong lynch for the reasons i have posted throughout the thread. If anyone has any more information/analysis, we have 2 hours left. step forward. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Possibly referring to a timed mechanic? | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Jackal and tntked are linked in some way, this much is clear. I feel that this clears both of suspicion for now in my eyes. from a mafia perspective it doesn't make sense to call attention to themselves, at least this early on in the game. Establishing themselves with a connection this early on is something I feel 2 townies would do to confirm each other, rather than a gambit by the scum to get town cred. Coupled with the fact that jackal seems to be playing differently than when he is scum makes me want to investigate other options for a lynch today other than tntked. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 17 2011 11:01 wherebugsgo wrote: Why don't you tell us? This sudden claim stuff is hella shady to me. It came at a really strange time of day, and it's not making any sense yet other than Jackal "confirming" tnkted as town. I find it weird that it's been put out there that tnkted is town but there's almost no explanation as for why or how. If you actually are town you'll get shot for sure (which is just dumb to me, idk why you would do that) and if you're not it makes sense as a gambit to get another mislynch today and get us closer to mylo. I think this lowers their suspicion level to me. here is why: Note when Jackal posted his assertion that tntked was town for the first time. Before the night post. Before that point a lot of us were talking about tntked and his behavior the previous day. The best reason I can see of this is that jackal thought the chances were good that he was going to die that night, so he posted information he had somehow obtain that tntked was town, in hopes that his death, flipping green/blue, and his post would prevent another mislynch on tntked today. The more complicated explination is that he is mafia, he fabricates a post about his scumbuddie tntked being town, and posts it in hopes the above argument is assumed, and a vig doesnt hit him or tnkted making him look guilty, or tntked isnt lynched anyway, exposing jackal as a liar, and now the scum is down by 2. I do not see any senario that would occur if only one of tntked or jackal was scum. in my eyes both have to either be town, or scum. Occam's Razor dictates that the first senario (with them both being town) is more simple, and therefore more likely. However, I await your explanation as to what in the hell is going on. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 17 2011 11:16 wherebugsgo wrote: I don't think you can tell either way. Either they're both townies, and Jackal knows something about tnkted so he's trying to prevent him from getting lynched. Or they're both mafia making a gambit to gain towncred. Look how fast half the town believed tnkted. What's weird to me is that tnkted seems to know how Jackal knows he is town. This makes very little sense to me, since certainly tnkted would back up Jackal when Jackal is defending him, but then why would tnkted push Jackal to explain it, in a way that seems as if tnkted already knows HOW Jackal knows? It just doesn't add up to me. Hmmm I did not think about that. The only way that i could think up is the fact that maybe a mason-like role exists in the game. This also comes up a bit empty because how would jackal hold more pieces to the puzzle. Tntked, any info is better for us than no info at all. Please explain what to your knowledge is going on here. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
It appears we have two choices at this point in time. Lynch Jackal to confirm tntked, with the risk of losing a small PM circle (along with whatever else jackal has), Or we accept this claim for now and move onto scumhunting until we learn more information. I am in favor of the latter at the moment. So I would like to direct your attention to Nisani201 *insert picture of gasping ponies* Basically my reasoning stems from this post right here. On September 16 2011 23:35 Nisani201 wrote: ##Vote: tnkted Up until this point I essentially had a null read on Nisani, and I was not looking closely at what he was doing/saying, at least not with my magnifying glass. This post made me curious, curious enough to bust out said magnifying glass and search the thread for some analysis on nishani's play. this is all that has been posted that I could find On September 15 2011 10:34 DroneAllDay wrote: well damn I decided to read the thread more (I'll be honest, i skimmed cuz i was afraid the vote was coming soon and I figured that i needed to vote then) filtering Curu's posts and not looking at them at 6:30 A.M. well that vote was how you say really REALLY+ Show Spoiler + STUPID CRAZY and wherebugsgo found this which I find interesting and so with that ##UNVOTE ##Vote:Nisani201 Not the best analysis, honestly just posting a link to his filter would have been more effecient. With this lack of analysis, nisani must have been really active and contributing right? well i decided to go read his filter in context and... nothing. Nisani has managed to slip under most every single radar. I plan to remedy that. The focal point of Nisani's current activity is around the time when Sinani was in danger of getting lynched. It is important to note, however, that Nisani does very little actual defending of Sinani, while making it look like he is. Let me elaborate. On September 15 2011 02:52 Nisani201 wrote: I am going to Unvote: Curu. I feel like we were all just arguing while scum watched and laughed. IMO there would have been more people in the conversation if one of us were scum. I will move my vote over to wherebugsgo, because he was perfectly active until we started arguing. He has posted no opinions on it because he doesn't feel the need to; he can afford for any of us to die. He simply comments on the same things that Curu has been bringing up, which is "Sinani played horribly in Ace's game, so we should lynch him." ##Vote: wherebugsgo On September 14 2011 12:26 Nisani201 wrote: This post is very much bullshit. So much so, that I will be putting my vote on you. This kind of behavior is anti-town. ##Vote: Curu Note how in these posts he establishes a connection to sinani, he clearly does not want him lynched and believes him to be town. In fact, he even presents WBG and curu as alternative targets. Also notice, however, that he never really tries to get people to vote for WBG or Curu because he knew he could get sinani to die. Because of said connection, and Sinani's green flip, Nisani has not been looked at that much today, because we associated their connection as two townies defending each other. I propose this assumption is incorrect. I think that Nisani is Scum, and tried his very best to look like he was defending sinani, when in reality he was really doing nothing of the sort. So when day 2 rolls around, he picks up on our newest target, tntked, and thinks he can get a wagon rolling right off the bat. but at what point has nisani ever expressed interest in voting tntked? thats right, never. ##Vote Nisani201 | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 18 2011 04:50 Curu wrote: GreyMisT can you explain your reasoning? If you believe their claim, you should believe they are Townies. Yet you say you feel like WBG knows what's going on, which following your belief would mean he knows they're Townies, but he's not being honest about it and trying to get them lynched? So we should back off him too? Say what? I believe you mixxed together my and forumite's post directly above you | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Cyber_Cheese, welcome to a truely messed up situation. care to weigh in? what do you think of the current events at the moment, and who do you feel is our best lynch today? | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
As far as I can see the day started out alright, but then went to shit mega fast. This is, at least for me, due to the fact that people without a piece of an element have no idea what is going on. Therefor i think anymore discussion regarding the potential mechanics of this game need to be kept to a minimum. All we can do for now is trust that those townies with the pieces don't act stupid with them. That is until we gain more info from a flip, DT check, or the day/night posts. We got an extra 15 hours guys, but we need to be talking about lynch targets. At the moment I have noticed a conspicuous absense of dreamflower. She was not the most active day1, but she did have detailed posts. I'd like her to weigh in. I'm keeping my vote on Nisani for the reasons i stated earlier, and until he explains the hell out of this. On September 18 2011 10:29 Nisani201 wrote: I dunno, all I can do is confirm that Forumite does indeed have an Element of Harmony, and it was obtained on D1. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
##Unvote Nisani201 His past behavior makes more sense in the context of recent events. Really need Dream,Sevyrn, and Cyber to contribute a bit more, we need to turn today's discussion back to scum hunting. ~24 hours left by my count. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
between the two major canidates, Im going to have to go for lucidity, his argument for WBG is based almost completely off meta from 1 game where he was blue, and a tracker at that. The play you described as a "tunnelwhore extrodinare" fits the play for a tracker, but not that for other town aligned roles he might get this game. On top of that there is this post On September 14 2011 19:55 Lucidity wrote: Essentially this post served two purposes:
Lynching lurkers should be a last resort. Going after lurkers (and by lurkers she actually means INACTIVES) allows scum to not offer any opinions and simply sheep onto an easy vote. This is not an ideal situation to say the least. She discredits the cases against Forumite and Greymist, by simply saying that she doesn't like post by post analysis and that she thinks townies are accusing townies. Could you explain why you think townies are accusing townies dreamflower? You offer no reason to doubt the case based on actual discussion points. Simply "oh I'm unconvinced". Note the displeasure when she sees that someone else voted Forumite. So instead of waiting for other's opinions on the LaL strategy she proposed, she goes ahead with it to try and divert attention away from real scum hunting by voting for DroneAllDay. Look at the reasoning in that post.
She thinks his defense is inept. But somehow he does not deserve any attention. Instead she "guesses" she'll vote for DroneAllDay. Point? She's defending Forumite with no real reasoning. She puts her vote on an inactive, not a lurker. The part highlighted in red essentially explains why ON is where her vote should be. DroneAllDay is an inactive, which she doesn't want to go for. She wants lurkers, and ON is one. Yet her vote stays on DroneAllDay. She dedicates an entire paragraph to explaining why DAD is a bad vote, and then doesn't change it. Then she goes on to try and push the LaL objective. We shouldn't be lynching for information. DEFINITELY not on Day 1. We should be hunting scum. Lynching lurkers (inactives) is not scum hunting. It doesn't give us any information, which you think is important? Yet you still advocate lynching lurkers. Going after "real" targets actually DOES offer us information ito voting patterns, defenses e t c . Not that, that is our first priority, but it blows your LaL policy out of the water. tl;dr Defends Forumite and greymist with no reasoning. Pushes anti-town objective of lynching inactives instead of scum hunting. (Note that she really means inactives when she says lurkers, even though she indicated otherwise. Her posts make that clear enough.) What happened to your case on Dreamflower lucidity? if she was playing this bad for the town, you would think you would carry over your pressure into day2, but it has been absent. This, coupled with forumite's points above are why im going for lucidity ##Vote Lucidity | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
And also: On September 18 2011 18:32 Lucidity wrote: ##Vote wherebugsgo I'll post my reasoning later when I get home. His angar like in the post above is one of the reasons. Am I the only one not in a PM circle? Fuck that shit. Also, dreamflower is on course to get modkilled? His anger is one of the reasons you are voting for him. Interesting. On September 19 2011 06:33 Lucidity wrote: Are you fucking with me? She has been completely inactive. I haven't seen scum being modkilled before so I put it on hold. I'm pretty sure the replacement is for her. She has had scummy ideas wrt lurkers and no lynch, but WBG is much more scummy imo. You're willing to lynch me because I'm not going after an inactive player? That's terrible. How am I more scummy than WBG? Explain this to me please. WBG's role as tracker only explains his tunneling of one candidate on his last day. The rest of his play was not influenced by that. WBG voted for tnkted AND jackal while he apparently believed their claim. Explain this to me. WBG forgot when he received the element of harmony. Explain this to me. !@$^&@#^ WBG repeatedly pointed out how scummy sinani was, but "never supported the lynch". EXPLAIN THIS TO ME. Forumite SKIMMED MY ANALYSIS. SKIMMED. What the fuck is that. This is retarded. If you're town, how can you possibly think your contribution is passable greymist? [QUOTE]On September 19 2011 06:43 Lucidity wrote: [QUOTE]On September 19 2011 06:05 Forumite wrote: You say it was a bait, I just see a FoS without any substance behind it, after getting WBG more or less confirmed, at least in my eyes. Scum would want to discredit any correct attempt to confirm Town, which makes pushing WBG at that time scummy. Of course I think you look scummy for it. I´ve read your case on WBG, skimmed it at least. Him forgetting when he got his piece, does it make him more scum? N1 makes less sense, as it must have come from Sinani, as Sinani wouldn´t have kept his piece when he was getting lynched and WBG didn´t look like the best one to send it to. The thing is, that when he got it doesn´t make him Scum, wether or not he lied about it might, if for example another Scum got it and that Scum told him the wrong day. Is that what you think? What looks weird is him pushing for more info from Jackal, even though he allready knew what they were talking about. He should have accepted earlier. That´s the part of your case on him I can agree with, at least before he gave up his piece. [/QUOTE] No substance? Top of page 38. !#&($^*@^#(%@#&%*!@%#&^% Why would you think I'm trying to discredit a "confirmed townie" in your eyes WHEN YOU DIDN"T TRUST HIM AT THE TIME? That doesn't add up. I'm completely amazed. Perhaps Forumite is WBG's scumbuddy after all. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Im not on you because you are not voting for an inactive player. at the beginning of this day we did not know that dream would be innactive, and yet we heard nothing from you about her at all. And also: On September 18 2011 18:32 Lucidity wrote: ##Vote wherebugsgo I'll post my reasoning later when I get home. His angar like in the post above is one of the reasons. Am I the only one not in a PM circle? Fuck that shit. Also, dreamflower is on course to get modkilled? His anger is one of the reasons you are voting for him. Interesting. On September 19 2011 06:33 Lucidity wrote: Are you fucking with me? She has been completely inactive. I haven't seen scum being modkilled before so I put it on hold. I'm pretty sure the replacement is for her. She has had scummy ideas wrt lurkers and no lynch, but WBG is much more scummy imo. You're willing to lynch me because I'm not going after an inactive player? That's terrible. How am I more scummy than WBG? Explain this to me please. WBG's role as tracker only explains his tunneling of one candidate on his last day. The rest of his play was not influenced by that. WBG voted for tnkted AND jackal while he apparently believed their claim. Explain this to me. WBG forgot when he received the element of harmony. Explain this to me. !@$^&@#^ WBG repeatedly pointed out how scummy sinani was, but "never supported the lynch". EXPLAIN THIS TO ME. Forumite SKIMMED MY ANALYSIS. SKIMMED. What the fuck is that. This is retarded. If you're town, how can you possibly think your contribution is passable greymist?[/quote] On September 19 2011 06:43 Lucidity wrote: No substance? Top of page 38. !#&($^*@^#(%@#&%*!@%#&^% Why would you think I'm trying to discredit a "confirmed townie" in your eyes WHEN YOU DIDN"T TRUST HIM AT THE TIME? That doesn't add up. I'm completely amazed. Perhaps Forumite is WBG's scumbuddy after all. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 19 2011 06:49 Jackal58 wrote: I'm thinking Lucidity is probably town. I think he's wrong but right now I'm thinking he's probably town. Sevryn, Curu and Cyber_Cheese need some love though. ##VOTE: Sevryn What makes him seem scummy to you? | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 19 2011 08:46 TheFerryman wrote: Didnt this happen once before? | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
## Unvote ## Vote Jackal58 You said earlier that you are ok with us killing you to confirm the alignment of tntked. I feel that is nessesary now more than ever. I forget the game, but we know that you have done crazy scum gambits before, like when you bussed jee jee day1ish. So far all analysis we have done today is WIFOM assuming that you and tntked are confirmed town. Looking back I now realize it is imperitave that we confirm tntked, the holder of the items. Or has your opinion changed jackal? are you no longer ok with supplying us with a 500% confirmed town at your expense? | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 19 2011 09:10 Jackal58 wrote: Nope. Have not changed a thing. If my lynch helps to secure a town victory I'm all for it. Of Forumite, WBG, and Lucidity at least 1 is definitely scum if not 2 of them. I personally see it as most likely 1 atm. If WBG flips town I don't know yet which of the other two is going to flip scum but one of them will. Alright, and I agree with your assessment ON Forumite, WBG and lucidity. To clarify things for everyone, This was not a pressure vote to see if jackal would change his opinion, but I glad to see he hasn't. I actually think we cannot move forward in this game at all without confirming tntked. We need to see Jackal flip in order to make sense of anything at all that has happened today, our own feelings about his alignment aside. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 19 2011 09:21 tnkted wrote: Ugh that clears up a lot. Rereading thread. FTR I'd rather not lynch jackal because he's the only other townie I feel 100% on Unfortunately We don't know your alignment, so saying you feel he is 100% town doesn't mean much to us. There are 3 senarios as I see it: 1) you are both green and everything you said is true 2) you are both red and performing the most epic gambit of all time 3) jackal is red and you are green, he is gambiting to make you believe he is green. Of all the senarios I dont feel 3 is nearly as likely as the other 2, because jackal gave you his piece, as did WBG. On that note you believe jackal because he gave you his piece, but you dont believe WBG even though he gave you his piece? maybe I'm missing something, enlighten me. Anyway we need to confirm that #1 is definatly the senario we have here. the only way I can see to do that is to lynch jackal today. a DT check on him tonight would be unreliable because of the possiblity of insanity, framer, godfather, and whatever the hell else is lurking in ponyville that we dont know about. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
I still feel that Lucidity is our best lynch for day2, his day1 play set off some alarm bells in my head, and tntked you posted some analysis of him day1 as well. ##Unvote | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
The trouble with today is I strongly believe that one or more of Cyber, Nisani, Sevryn, dream, and curu are scum. But unless we all want to go for a random lurker lynch we dont have enough to go on for any of them. actually does anyone know why we stopped voting for nisani? things got chaotic a few pages back. did he have a piece or was it because he was in a PM circle? | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 19 2011 08:33 Lucidity wrote: Ok I need to go to sleep now. If I end up being lynched it should be easy to find the scum on me. tnkted has refused to respond to my defense of his analysis on me. He has called me "very town" but still thinks I should be lynched. If he is considered a good player, his play has been very bad this game. Since Day 2 I have operated under the assumption that he was just a derping townie, but if he is actually pushing an agenda and I get lynched I don't think we should discount the possibility that he gambited by giving his element to Jackal. If Forumite ends up on my lynch he is easily scum. Please look at my posts regarding him in the early game and chaos' case against him. Since Night 1 Forumite has only posted Fluff and talked about the elements. His only attempt at scum hunting was an extremely weak case against me. He has now stated that he doesn't believe I'm scum anymore so that's self explanatory... I guess WBG will just put his vote wherever he can avoid his own death. DONT LET A NO LYNCH OCCUR. Even if that means I have to die. At least we find scum if I die. Jackal, why are you diverting the lynch away from WBG to Sevryn? You didn't even provide a case on him. That's really troubling me. I had thought you were very town before you did that. If a no lynch occurs because Jackal pushed a Lurker lynch make sure to look in to him more thoroughly. I've been looking over posts from lucidity and reevaluating my case on him, because thats pretty much what it has come down to. Lucidity or WBG. I came across this post, a "see ya later post" that mafia would definatly NOT make. Mafia post something like this in an effort to stop a lynch from happening, they do not post something in order to help town after a lynch. Looking back at nisani I feel he is scum, look at this post here On September 17 2011 04:01 Nisani201 wrote: ##Unvote I'm going to trust you on this one, only because this is a closed setup and I have no idea what could be going on behind the scenes. Who are our other lynch suspects? Long you confirmed things for us, he says this. Would a townie be this accepting of someone just claiming out of the blue? remember, only scum know who is town. Unfortunatly we cannot get a nessesary vote on nisani even if i could get everyone to vote for him. Some things WBG have said are scummy, but I dont have the best read on him right now. That being said, we cannot have a no lynch today. Because I dont think it is possible to change everyone's vote in such a short amount of time: ##Vote Wherebugsgo Forumite you are in a similar position I am voting for someone who wont get lynched. who do you want to go for today? | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
The problem with a no-lynch is we pretty much get to do today all over again, but with the absence of a town member due to nighttime. Of course, if some blues come forth with info on day3 that would be great, but not likely. On the other hand killing a townie just for the sake of killing someone is not a good idea, and if we all feel pretty good about WBG being town we shouldn't kill him. What do you guys think about a no-lynch | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
I also would prefer a no-lynch. Jackal what do you think? | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
I am the Doctor. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Thats my favorite of the main 6. but we went over that already. What is your thought behind having us do this jackal? | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Here's hoping we can get some more activity in the next day. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 20 2011 09:08 Curu wrote: Here you go: I will tell you after GMarshal answers my question. I still don't know if I am allowed to reveal posts from the QT or not. I had forgotten where this was as well, thanks for the link. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Gl hF town! | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 21 2011 11:34 Jackal58 wrote: Ditto. Where the hell did everybody go? + Show Spoiler + well i would be here but..... | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
GG guys. if only my check on sevryn went through before i died | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
It might just be me, but a lot of the reason we got annihilated this game was because of day2 and the chaos that ensued then. a lot of the confusion on my part was due to the way the items were handled, suddenly we have a new mechanic, people claiming to be confirmed town, and speculation. my play day1 sucked lol. hopefully I improved as the game went along. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 24 2011 10:12 wherebugsgo wrote: Also Greymist, always check lynch targets/suspects. Don't bother with lurkers like chaos. That's what I've learned with lurkers in mafia games, majority of the time they've bored/incompetent VTs. In chaos's case he had RL obligations or w.e. You should've checked tnkted or Curu night one. Tnkted because I was pushing him real hard as the alternate wagon, and Curu cause sinani flipped town. Ofc Curu would've showed up inn but it's better than nothing. You could' e checked me too to see why I was pushing tnkted when no one else was I didnt check tntked because i thought he would be the major lynch target day2 anyway. but yea i realize now how that reasoning is flawed. I had never played a DT before and had no idea who i should check or not. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 24 2011 10:20 GMarshal wrote: Town's fault IMO, mechanics discussion should never replace scumhunting and behavioral analysis, if the town got sidetracked then someone should have made an effort to bring it back in line. And remember kids, GMarshal games are designed to deny confirmed townies as much as possible, so always take that into account when someone claims to be 100% confirmed, in no way scum, Oh yea it was definatly our fault, I wasnt trying to say that the mechanics were the reason why we lost. Just trying to figure out where we went wrong. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On September 24 2011 10:23 Erandorr wrote: Could someone explain to me why jackal and tnkted were seen as 100 percent confirmed town? I didnt want to bring that up ingame since all went fairly well The reasoning was that both jackal and tnkted were given a piece of harmony. Jackal said they should hold onto their pieces. However, tntked, believing he would die at night gave his piece to jackal. He viewed this move as highly unlikely from a scum player who would not know the power of the item. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
| ||