a town with no detection? interesting...
Cosmic Horror Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
a town with no detection? interesting... | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
That said ##Vote: Navillus Because he was the first person to talk about being a townie. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote: Navillus If he feels the need to convince Jackal he's a townie, I think it's more likely that he's not actually a townie. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote: Palmar Didn't edit the name when I copy pasta'd it. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
And the doc can't reveal because the mafia will target him Wait, didn't someone say something about the doc debuff being cancelled because of the extra mafia? Or was that not official? And while I'm talking about a docs powers, doc cant heal the psychologist from suicide can he? as far as I can tell, this is a game of all claiming townie and praying the lynches work in our favour | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 24 2011 03:21 Sevryn wrote: What if we just have everyone claim they checked someone everyday so that way the psych doesn't have to claim but when he dies we can go back and see who he has checked. the only flaw being the possibility for the horror to visit the psych instead of vice-versa making someone else look guilty | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 24 2011 03:35 Hesmyrr wrote: @Cyber_Cheese You don't have to care about that. All the role details shown on the OP are 100% correct, such as this: @Jackal58 oops, thanks for that | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
It starts 9v3v1, assuming the mafia manage to hit town it's only ever going to go downhill unless we lynch and get lucky and/or someones percieved slip up is actually that. I'm thinking the plan to mention who we visited (even if we didn't) is better than nothing because *if* the psych happens to die there is a remote chance he did actually visit the horror That said, I'm going to kick things off and say I'm going to visit Erandorr, I advise everybody to choose someone and do the same. I never actually believed Palmar was anti-town, but there was an arguement against him and I didn't want to not lynch, so ##Unvote Now, having read up to this point, one person seems to be pushing the identity of the horror rather too strongly, don't you think? I'm thinking he's panicked from getting the third party role and tried to pin the blame on someone else from the get-go ##Vote: TheFerryman Note how Ferryman used examples of wiggles from other games, despite this being his first? I think he was likely looking at other games to see how a third party faction should be played, and just happened to come up with some 'evidence' that wiggles could be used as a scapegoat. Also I don't really think meta-arguements should be used, keep it within what's been said this game. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
##extension I have nothing against it. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Am I alone here? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote: Tnkted He mentioned something about a newbie mistake as coverup for Navillus, but that would be a newbie mistake for someone playing mafia more so than someone on town. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
If I happen to be lynched because of it, so be it, at least towns not wasting a chance to lynch | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Breadcrumbing summary: The doc lies so mafia cant backtrack who healed the person they attacked accurately... so the doc cant breadcrumb The rest of town feign visiting and psych tells the truth because the psych is our best lead on finding the horror The forseen problem with that was that the EH would know who 'visited' them and if they didn't die, would know they were not worth a visit So what if town agreed to which person the psych visits anonymously? e.g. town agrees that psych should visit (I don't know, me?) and if the psych turns up dead we can assume hes (I'm in this case) the EH | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 02:20 Forumite wrote: If players lie in breadcrumbing, then we get WIFOM and confusion. The doc can´t point at his breadcrumbs in case he is going to get lynched, so he´ll probably get lynched precisely because his breadcrumbs don´t add up with what is happening in the game. Scum and EA will analyse breadcrumbs, either getting valuable info, or a good alibi, which the Blues can´t contradict without outing themselves. It will create a mess, and we don´t want a mess. I'm saying town should agree on who the psych should visit and no-one should breadcrumb themselves essentially turning psych into a group role to avoid the being singled out as did/did not visit psych dying could correlate to a) psych visited horror, b) horror visited psych or c) mafia attacked psych if psyche is sane when he dies, we can rule out c, but c could happen the same night as a or b if we don't know who the psych visits, we don't get any information on who EH might be, if we do, it's a 50/50 I'm pretty sure we're better off with the 50/50 | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
My apologies, I forgot that. ##Unvote ##Vote MrWiggles just for references sake, i made a list posts so far since the game started 1. Mr. Wiggles 5 2. Cyber_Cheese 12 3. Sevryn 8 4. TheFerryman 12 5. chaos13 5 6. Palmar 14 7. Navillus 5 8. Eiii 2 9. JeeJee 2 10. Jackal58 11 11. Forumite 8 12. Erandorr 11 13. tnkted 18 both of eiii's were spent accusing palmar scum tend to stay really quiet on sc2 mafia, im not sure how forum mafia compares | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 02:36 Mr. Wiggles wrote: So what made you change your mind so quick, when neither me nor ferryman posted between these? Rather contradictory, don't you think? You've posted less, out of the two of you I'd rather ferryman based off that, and tnkted accusing me made me realise just how scummy I made myself look In my experience with SC2 mafia, only weak town roles accuse each other on day 1 because if they turn out to be wrong they're only townies | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 03:03 Forumite wrote: So in your opinion, Wiggles and Ferryman are probably Scum? It doesn´t really add up with your earlier post, Wiggles might have few posts, but they are HUGE, he´s only posting long analysis and policy posts. Ferryman is quite active, and drew a lot of attention to himself early. If you are looking for players trying to stay out of sight, they look like very bad choices. at the moment, i'm believing wiggles is the horror | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + A journalist interviews a farmer : - You have a very nice field, and a good number of cows, do you get a good production out of it ? - Yes, yes ! mostly from the white cows. - Not from the black ? - Oh yes, from the black too ! - They seem very calm - They are very calm, mostly the white. - The black cows aren't ? - Yes, the black are very calm too ! - Do they make a good milk ? - Yes, mainly the white. - The black don't ? - Oh, yes, they do too. - Sir I don't understand, why do you always refere to this white cows then ? - Well, listen to me. It's because the white cows are mine. - The black aren't ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Show Spoiler + - Yes, they are also mine oops, forgot i wasnt meant to edit, apologies, spoilered the ending | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 02:35 JeeJee wrote: what do you suggest happens if we all vote for psych to visit himself? p.s. it's not 50-50 just because there's 2 possibilities. it's like, the odds of anything happening are 50-50 because it either happens or it doesn't. this raises a question Can visiting roles choose to do nothing? If so, the ideas good and psych sits at home | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 06:25 TheFerryman wrote: Making lists is a great way to contribute without contributing, and in this post you go and point out that Eiii is lurking and then vote for wiggles. While indicating mafia like to lurk, you either aren't reading what you write or you just wanted to post without thinking. Either way, its poor play, I expect you to remedy that asap, also I want you to explain why you voted wiggles. For the purposes of this post, Elritch Horror = EH Based on the arguments so far, I believe wiggles to be the EH I'm not a fan of meta arguments at all, if someone were to slip up it should be a mistake they made completely in-game As for why wiggles when I suspect someone as scum? There are 4 things that can happen if we lynch: 1) The person is a townie 7/13, it's not a real loss comparatively, bad but still acceptable 2) The person is a power role (Doc/Psych) 2/13, much worse off for town 3) The person is mafia 3/13, this is acceptable, not the best solution but a good one 4) The person is EH 1/13, night is skipped and we stand at essentially a 12p game, psyche is as good as townie, and it's a 96H day 5) No-one, the game proceeds to night, I'll go into this below On any of the first three, we can analyse the people who put the person up there and potentially narrow down our list of suspects. Of note, and assuming that the towns intelligent choices don't allow the vote to get deflected by the mafia such that all 13 people have an equal chance (It's potentially the other way around), losing a power role is half as likely as killing a scum. Now on to the night, EH first, 5 possibilities, all fractions are based off no-lynches 1) He chooses mafia, 1/4, town is unaffected 2) He chooses Townie, 7/12, again no effect 3) He chooses Doc, Doc might now kill someone he deemed important enough to heal tonight 4) He chooses Psych, psych promptly dies 5) Psych heals the EH's target later, I estimate this at 11/12*1/11, since there's an 11/12 chance the Psych isn't the target with the EH and a 1/11 it's the correct one, this is 1/12, roughly 8.3% (wow what that's back to 1/12?! Is my math right?) 5 isn't possible if the town votes for Psychs target unless EH is stupid, I argued this being a good idea earlier, I still stand by that. The mafia will do one of 5 things (I was about to ask if mafia would know the reason their attack failed, doc heal verses EH, but they know if they go insane and if doc heal saved the target so it's elementary) 1) The mafia hit the EH, they know who he is now and have no reason to kill him, in fact they potentially benefit keeping him alive so a night is not skipped 2) The mafia hit a Townie, 7/10, someone who was nowhere near the towns focus is killed more than likely and nothing good comes of it 3) The mafia hit the Doc, 1/10, bad night 4) The mafia hit the Psych. 1/10, potentially just as bad 5) Doc heals the victim, 9/10*9/12*1/9, person is known to be town, 9/12 being the docs non-scum targets, 9/10 is the doc not being the one hit, 1/9 is the chance of a correct choice, which becomes 3/40, or 7.5% (Again, math check) Note that some combinations of the above are worse than others Under which circumstances did we gain information overnight? There's a 3/40 that the doctors save will occur (the chance worked out the same it was the horror that got hit, at this point I distrust my math more so than ever, saddening for a student engineer but I digress) There's a 1/12 that we know the person psych visited isn't the EH, assuming we know who the psych visited, halve this because there is an equal chance the EH visited him, and a 1/144 of the optimal both if we add 3/40 and 1/12, there is about 16% chance something good happened overnight without a lynch, whereas there is a 31% chance we hang a scum note that the former percentage would go up if the lynching isn't the doc/psych This is why I am pushing for a lynch so hard. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 06:51 Erandorr wrote: I probably should explain : Notice how bad Cyber has been playing before, note then that he didnt answer any of my accusations and found the one point in my post that could be used as a deversion. Either he is really , really shitty town or badly playing SCUM/ EA I believe town is best off lynching somebody, as I've stated before, if my pushing to lynch somebody makes me that somebody, so be it I had it coming. On August 25 2011 06:54 JeeJee wrote: this raises a better question why do you keep bringing up this idea of coordinating a psych decision? *everyone votes for psych to visit A* *psych has committed suicide* "Ah, A must be EA!" *Lynch A* *A is not EA because EA visited psych and not vice versa* Now what? you're here quite often, you make a lot of posts. but all i'm seeing is that you want to kill someone, and you don't care who as long as it's not yourself. i'm seeing useless lists and pushing flawed plans. i'm seeing nonsense. ##vote:cyber cheese As opposed to what? psyche dying and us having no clue as to who? for someone opposed to random lynching, the 50/50 on the person being EH this presents should look more appealing than 4/11 (assuming both mafia got a kill and psych died to EH overnight, maybe even 4/10 if we lynch today and it's town) granted there are more variables to consider than just those there, but I'm telling you that 50/50 is potentially the best it is going to get. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 07:41 TheFerryman wrote: No, because I'm pretty sure wiggles is the EH, and if we lynch the EH we get a free day. I also have yet to see people build a real case that proves he is mafia, so far all I have seen is "he has played stupid", witch brings us back to the rule of thumb. If you are going to lynch cyber I want someone who is going to take responsibility for the lynch, rather than have a bunch of people push a green lynch and then say "he was stupid anyway, its his fault" and no-one ends up being responsible. You want him lynched Navillus? Are you willing to own up to it if he flips green? Why is the case against him more convincing than the case against wiggles? Tnkted was the first to vote against me, given that he's been considered suspicious already I would definitely hold him to blame in that scenario | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 07:52 TheFerryman wrote: Funny, I thought you said you thought I was the EH. What changed your mind? Also all those numbers are irrelevant, we know we have to lynch, and no one is going to allow a no-lynch to happen. That does *not* mean jumping on every possible vote that happens. You are the current voteleader, should we all vote for you as to not risk the possibility of a no lynch? Or should we look for the EH or scum and make our lynch count? Remember if we lynch a townie we bring the mafia a step closer to victory. Think before posting, lynching correctly is vital, and jumping on every bandwagon isn't going to achieve that. We could all pull a number out of a hat to pick who we lynch, how would that help bring us closer to victory? Of course not, it would provide no information, its the same deal with easy bandwagons, mafia can easaly blend in with arguments like the one you are making "oh, I didn't think he was mafia, but hey, I did it to avoid a no-lynch" Your justification is poor to say the least, step up your game. What made you change your mind about me being the EH? If you really think I am it is your duty to write an analysis that proves it and sell it to the rest of the town. You don't want to lynch anyone, just for the sake of lynching, you want to lynch scum. Otherwise you aren't town. At the moment, the current evidence points to wiggles as the EH. Rest assured that if/when it's wrong I'll be making a full post on why your the real EH. Until the first lynch or two, we have no clear-cut way of determining who the mafia is, after that point we can see who defended the innocent/guilty person and analyse from there I'm not quite sure at what point you convinced yourself that the band wagoning I was doing wasn't directed at people I believed to be scum It would be in the eldritchs best interests to discredit the people who accuse him wouldn't it? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 08:09 JeeJee wrote: tldr: lynching is good. this is a pretty long and useless post indeed. i'm not a fan of discussing plans or mechanics unless other people are jumping on a terrible idea. so cut it out and let's get back to discussing people. why exactly do you think wiggles is EA? you haven't answered my earlier question about it.. "based on the arguments posted earlier" isn't an explanation. and yes ferryman, I'd gladly take responsibility for cyber's lynch, which would include praise when he flips scum I assume. Notice how ferryman made someone else take responsibility? It's the one same thing he's been accusing MrWiggles of no less | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
By way overwhelming amounts of accusations I'm going to cut back on the voting I still say it's ferryman and I'll gladly be responsible for it if he's town, but I'll cast that vote later after anyone chooses to agree with me | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 08:25 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Please tell me what your actual scum reads are, with reasons. Do you still think that all the people you voted for are scum, or do you believe some of them to be town now? Why? At the moment, my views hinge on two important people 1) If MrWiggles turns out not to be the eldritch, then I believe Ferryman to be the eldritch himself. On the off-chance Wiggles isn't the eldritch, then I believe Ferryman to be town, based off various arguments that Ferryman has made against wiggles. 2) If Tnkted is mafia, I believe Navillus to also be mafia because Tnkted chose to ignore what Navillus said at the start of day 1 about being a townie, before looking a few posts further and voting Palmar based off his joke, this would also make Palmar innocent in my eyes. Again, this is perfectly inversed. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Is it just me, or does Chaos keep talking about going into more detail while never actually doing so? On August 24 2011 12:37 chaos13 wrote: I haven't got time to devote to proper posting tonight. I've skimmed through everything so far, and I'm glad to see that the spam has cut down and we've got good discussion going. My initial thoughts: 1. Palmar probably isn't scum. The case against him is claiming that a joke response was a scum slip. 2. People pushing for lynching Palmar based on the above are dumb or scum. If they've got a good reason (haven't seen any so far) then it's not suspicious. 3. tnkted is probably scum 4. Ferryman, you've got a great case on wiggles, but with one problem. You designed that case to prove that he's the EA. What you should be doing is analyzing and then figuring out what he is. Because it was the cause and not the effect, I'm not yet convinced by it. I'll get something more detailed up tomorrow morning. On August 24 2011 20:50 chaos13 wrote: Erandorr, since you're around right now, what do you think of tnkted? Was his accusation of Palmar warranted, and does the logic behind it make sense to you? On August 24 2011 20:57 chaos13 wrote: It's a 48 hour day cycle, isn't it? That's what the OP states. On August 24 2011 21:27 chaos13 wrote: Not at all. However, I'm not always the best scumhunter, so I'd like to call on the analysis skills of Jackal58. Jackal, what do you think of tnkted's play so far in this game? I'm also going to vote tnkted, since I can always change it later if need be. ##Vote: tnkted | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Oh my mistake, it was supposed to signify one or the other. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 09:01 Navillus wrote: I am going to focus on scumhunting because only a very bad EH would make it obvious enough who they are that we could correctly lynch them day 1. So first I would like to quickly draw attention to Now this is a standard scum play, let town accuse someone then set it up for the accuser to get lynched if the accused flips town this is illogical the full argument that you would need to accept to make this make sense includes it being impossible for a townie to mislynch, or to be wrong, I think we can all agree that this is not the case and this argument simply leads to what are essentially revenge lynches. That said I think there are scummier people this game, namely Cyber_Cheese, it could be argued that he isn't scum just playing badly, I happen to think both are true, he's just supported too scummy things for me to let him go. He likes random lynching, is saying he's fine taking the lynch, (if he were actually fine with it that might be a town thing but in what I've read people saying that tend to be scum) he's jumped all over the place with his voting with very little reasoning, and overall I'm getting the sense from him that he's trying really hard to stay active, but is just throwing things out there without actually thinking about anything (see his random voting, the giant listing of fractions, and his joke) and in general this attempt to stay really active gives me a really guilty feel from him SO ##Vote Cyber_Cheese So tl;dr you'd lynch me to promote lurker play? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
You might have a point there, and the tl;dr i summized might actually be inaccurate | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
I would promote discussion on chaos and eiii before putting the nail in my coffin. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
just in case i miss the deadline, im going to ##Vote Tnkted for a few reasons 1) and lets start with the petty one, he's the one who first bought me up as a suspected scum, in an effort to save his own hide 2) I voted for him previously before stopping to vote for the EH, since im not sure which of wiggles or ferryman i believe to be EH more, Tnkted seems like a safer lynch option 3) Chaos made a pretty convincing post, and it wasn't the first of it's ilk | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
That said, I'm keeping my vote on him because of two reasons: 1) He might actually be scum 2) I have to have a vote placed and he's still what I consider the safest bet | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 25 2011 21:25 Palmar wrote: Why are you more concerned with not being wrong than killing scum? Uh yea I see how it could come across that way in hindsight I don't think he's innocent, I'm just saying I think he made himself look guilty in the same manner I did, more or less And noones specifically come out to defend him either if i'm not mistaken I'm looking for parallels that reflect in my play to learn the differences between sc2 and forum mafia as I go | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [Breadcrumbing Revisited] + The doc does not breadcrumb, straightforward. The previous version was the rest of town feign visiting and psych tells the truth because the psych is our best lead on finding the horror The forseen problem with that was that the EH would know who 'visited' them and if they didn't die, would know they were not worth a visit So what if town agreed to which person the psych visits anonymously? e.g. town agrees that psych should visit (I don't know, me?) and if the psych turns up dead we can assume hes (I'm in this case) the EH I'm saying town should agree on who the psych should visit and no-one should breadcrumb themselves essentially turning psych into a group role to avoid the being singled out as did/did not visit psych dying could correlate to a) psych visited horror, b) horror visited psych or c) mafia attacked psych if psyche is sane when he dies, we can rule out c, but c could happen the same night as a or b if we don't know who the psych visits, we don't get any information on who EH might be, if we do, it's a 50/50 Bear in mind that if we can't prepare a strong argument for the person being the EH, we can still leave it at that and not lynch, and if we vote for the psych he can just not visit that night Thoughts? Opinions? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 26 2011 06:49 JeeJee wrote: on the caveat that you don't auto-lynch anyone if psych ends up suiciding, then it's workable to try and find out who is the EA. we could use the psych as an EA-cop. i'm in for this. but you've been posting a lot about plans and not a lot about people, so what do you think about sevryn and palmar's unvote? Since you asked: Sevryn is a person I consider to be in much the same boat as Eiii, with the whole lurking thing On August 26 2011 09:45 JeeJee wrote: yeah no, this doesn't apply to this variation at all. ea cannot assume that the person we tell the psych to visit isn't the psych. this variation is workable, provided we don't auto-lynch anyone just because psych suicides. I've been looking through the arguments on breadcrumbing, having read the latest version I believe there are very few reasons that we should be saying the plan wouldn't work, but outright denying it? It doesn't seem very pro-town to be outright trying to shutdown any plan which might make town create an organized way of searching for the EH. Of note we should mention it was his idea that everybody breadcrumb and then we can check the psych when he dies, which would have been a resurrection of the original plan without actually removing much EH bias. At the moment he doesn't particularly stand out overall, he needs more time in the spotlight to form anything solid. As for palmars cancelled vote? Both voting off someone you suspect to be a townie and using an extension day 1 are bad options, I don't really see it as much except him considering it the lesser of two evils, there is too much back and forth between him and tnkted. I think a real scum would have lynched Tnkted if he were innocent so we could bring it to night And a freebie that wasn't in the question Ferryman seems to be clutching at straws now for lynching Wiggles, the whole EH thing doesn't work so he accuses him of mafia instead? As a townie in wiggles shoes, would you have suggested that your a mafia when the accusations are of you being the EH? I don't know about you guys but the 'trap' definitely would have got me | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 26 2011 10:42 Sevryn wrote: me that way I know he doesn't die first night and he knows I'm not the horror I understand your reasoning, but I don't think it's in towns best interests to check you. In my opinion: We should have the psych visit the people we suspect the most of being the EH checked as early as possible, to minimize the odds that the horror finds the psych first It's also a good method of alleviating EH pressure from wrongfully accused townies, should that situation exsist. As such, I think it currently makes the most sense for psych to visit MrWiggles, if we aren't going to lynch him. If we lynch Wiggles and he turns out not to be the horror, I would check Ferryman overnight instead. However, with that said, Sevryn is currently one of the people I'd like to have checked early in | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 26 2011 16:36 Navillus wrote: Ahhh this did not help you in my eyes, are you or are you not ok with it not, "I'm fine with it but he shouldn't" so for one I think mafia kills show up differently, actually [green]will a suicide be announced as a suicide, different from a murder[green] If suicides are announced differently then the only screw-up would be EH guessing right night1 There is a 1/11 chance of EH guessing correctly night1 which means if we do agree to check you and the psych dies the only way it wouldn't mean that you're EH is that 1/11 chance, and honestly I would auto-vote you on 10-1 odds, my question is would you accept this including getting lynched if the psych commits suicide, or are you really that worried about that 1/11 chance? it wont matter, we'll see if hes sane or not | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Wiggles first- We should lynch someone believed to me mafia overnight, while the psych should visit MrWiggles tonight and if he rocks up insane(+dead by logical extension), we know Ferrymans arguments have a solid base While lynching the Eldritch is a great move for town, a day 1 that's extended via Eldritch lynch isn't as useful as say extending day 3/4 At this point, it's a bad idea to introduce people that don't already have votes Myself- I'm not going to vote myself Which leaves Palmar and Tnkted- I'm not an expert on this, was it easier or harder than usual to get votes for tnkted? If it's been harder oneself could assume the mafias supporting him, but if it's been easier than it should then I feel i should move my vote because I've been thinking about this quote of Palmars On August 24 2011 00:29 Palmar wrote: I have discarded my win condition, my sole object this game will be to convince Jackal I'm town, seeing as it's a feat I've never achieved. I'm suspecting Tnkted was onto something, and we've let it slide I'm not sure exactly how strong the back story is, but it seems the kind of joke that would be best if they were both mafia, and/or at the least Palmar was The question is why was he thinking of convincing people that he was town from the get-go, and combined with the whole disregarding the win condition seeming to separate the two unnecessarily if he were to be a town role Also of note is the choice of derp as an initial reply, it would seem the most logical choice if he were to be admitting to a mistake Note that this differs from Navillus on two areas On August 24 2011 00:20 Navillus wrote: Dammit I need to role something more interesting than townie one of these days... anyway, I've never played a mini before so I'm very open to any mini-specific advice anyone has. 1) No matter what Navillus role is, it's something that someone might think to say 2) When called out on it, he didn't react defensively, and chose to vote back on the person who voted him, indicating a lack of concern that he had aroused suspicion That alone, sure it's fine, but combined with the changing vote /extension use thing There were a lot of people defending Palmar, certainly more than Tnkted It all leads me to this ##Unvote ##Vote Palmar | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 26 2011 19:21 Palmar wrote: You're clearly not reading the thread. None of the people pushing Wiggles think he's EA over any other kind of anti-town entity. I have no idea if he's the EA, and neither does Ferryman. The reason people are defending me is because it's sensible to defend me. You're new to this game so I'm leaning that the reason you ignore facts, don't read the thread and approach the game from the point you're doing, is because you're unintentionally bad, instead of Mr. Wiggles's accusation of me which is almost certainly maliciously bad. The fact that Wiggles has tried to swing a vote on me in a game where I am in my opinion radiating townie sunshine all over, is especially incriminating, because it's bad play, and wiggles isn't a bad player. By elimination the only remaining option is Wiggles being maliciously bad, which is almost certainly the case. I still need to form an opinion on you, but I was leaning town. Now that you have proved to me you aren't reading the thread, I need another look. I intentionally disregard the 'trap' for three reasons: 1) If it was a trap, wouldn't it be well thought out? Why wouldn't this 'trap' have been sprung BEFORE the extension? Surely if it were designed to be a trap from the get-go there was plenty of time in which the 'trap' could have been sprung with time to spare to secure votes 2) It seems more like a compromise. "Well guys you obviously don't all agree the horror so I'll just call him mafia and you guys vote on him now?" I'm not really sure of a better way to word this, it's just an impression I got 3) Only Palmar and Jackal have expressed any positive interest in the trap, for a grand total of three, and there are three mafia. This one I admit isn't a fair argument to use against it, but the first point basically convinces me on it's own | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
I'm going to apologise for not changing my vote, I fell asleep a few hours before the deadline. ##Visit MrWigges He was under the heaviest suspicion of being EA, and his response to being checked started out well but finished with an attempt at undermining the value of having some clue where the psych goes | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 27 2011 09:51 Mr. Wiggles wrote: I'm fine with being checked, but what indication do we have that the psychologist actually visits me? I don't want him to not listen, show up dead, and then I get lynched. If we have everyone vote, he should just vote for who he's visiting. ##Visit: Wiggles If I turn out to be psychologist ##Visit: JeeJee Hmm, making the chosen one chose alternate target for the case where the chosen one is psych... We should incorporate this alongside the voting, since it stops the psych from just sitting at home and wasting a night | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 27 2011 12:27 chaos13 wrote: I think the psychologist should do whatever they feel like. Too often the town majority ends up failing hard. Blue roles are distributed to individuals for this very reason. I'm not sure that's a correct assessment Some roles might be incapable of it, but a role that dies the night it finds it's target? Outside of that we only really need the psych to heal the doc if he goes insane, and there's no way the mafia would let the doc live once he's revealed. Sure the psych helps in the fight against the EA, but he does it more effectively if we know where he's been | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
1) he could be trolling as town, out of boredom or something 2) if he's been using it as code, who were the recipients? surely theres some more examples, maybe even people replying? point 1) is weakened by his reply after it was spotted At this point, I think wiggles is clean: If I were the mafia, I'd choose someone intelligent, active, and that was trying to get an innocent lynched | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
That umad just looks so forced though... ##Vote JeeJee | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 28 2011 06:54 Jackal58 wrote: Are you suggesting there is a traitor role in this game? If there is it's not in the OP. Do you know something we don't? Is that why you killed Palmar? Jee Jee if it wasn't for the U Mad at the end I'd briefly consider coincidence. No, I don't know anything special, I overlooked the fact that mafia could PM each other overrides the no PM's rule by mistake. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
I suppose I should extend on that, while looking through, I was reminded that you were pushing to have me killed for a while I was willing to go with a somewhat stretched benefit of doubt before that | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 28 2011 10:17 JeeJee wrote: i'll put my closing thoughts after day wraps up, before i'm officially dead. i already have it written up, hence the defeatist tone. there's nothing more for me to say, plus it's 10/12 already ![]() Good question... Are we able to turn the other half of the day into an extension and make up for the one we burned if 12/12 vote him? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Lets get some discussion going: At this point in time, who do you think is town, and why? I mentioned earlier that On August 28 2011 06:34 Cyber_Cheese wrote: At this point, I think wiggles is clean: If I were the mafia, I'd choose someone intelligent, active, and that was trying to get an innocent lynched Palmar was the perfect example of this, and that's a part of why I think wiggles is town. Ferryman and Tnkted both pushed hard for a target to be lynched on day 1, Wiggles and Palmar respectively, harder than I believe a scum would on day 1, so I think they are town. People I want to hear more of: Sevryn, Eiii, Chaos | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 28 2011 21:00 Jackal58 wrote: Only scum want a short day. Y U scum Cyber? Negative, I figured we could get an extension refund On August 28 2011 22:04 chaos13 wrote: You want us all to give you our town reads? What does that accomplish? It just gives scum better targets, because if 7 people think player A is town, and player A isn't on the mafia team, then who do you think they're gonna hit? Probably player A, and then we're short a trustworthy townie. I'll work on looking at JeeJee's posts and seeing if I can find similarities/connections to other players right now. Post what I find in a bit. It was an attempt to create discussion, albeit apparently a bad one On August 29 2011 02:54 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Finding EA on day 1 is sub-optimal. It's a lot better to try to find him from now on, but only if we are very certain of his flip, and have a good target for a mafia lynch as well. I'm pretty sure I said something about this on Day 1, that finding the EA on the first day is the least optimal day to lynch him on, as we have the least information available, and thus can make the least use of the extra lynch. Why so scummy, JeeJee? Hiding behind "eliminating a town threat" rhetoric, when it was the worst time to kill the horror and the day we would be most likely to mislynch anyways. Also, to keep track: #Of insane people 0-1/12 note that the EA is counted as insane, so its 1-2 | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
I'd like to throw suspicion of forumite for actually believing the psych claim: On August 29 2011 08:05 Forumite wrote: You don´t think it would have been a good idea to tell us earlier!? Seriously! You are just hurting Town when you act like this. We are not going to lynch a blue who is most likely getting killed directly after claiming anyway, but you don´t give us much time to find another target. Okay, who did you check during the first night? ##Unvote | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
##Visit Chaos13 because of these two posts On August 30 2011 07:10 chaos13 wrote: I would suggest the Psychologist don't visit Jackal, precisely because he is the EA. I'm going to vote Jackal tomorrow and be pushing for his lynch, so what is the point in causing our psych to kill himself by visiting Jackal? That's the whole point, it's like extra details we can help turn into a case against him On August 29 2011 22:09 chaos13 wrote: No, it's that you spent 3 hours looking for breadcrumbs. I know you've given an explanation already, but I'm not buying it. I can see taking 3 hours looking back through the thread and trying to analyze while you wait for him to call, but why were you looking for breadcrumbs? Let's go through each role and see what motivation they would have for that. Townie - No logical reason. Maybe they're looking for psych/doctor, but what will they do with that information? They have no way to figure out if it is a lie or not, since anyone can breadcrumb anything when the role PM's are in the OP. Doctor - Looking for psych so they can protect them. Unfortunately, this possibility is ruled out since Palmar already flipped doc. Psychologist - Same as Townie. EA sure as hell isn't going to breadcrumb their role, and players don't know if they're sane or not so they can't crumb whether or not they've been visited. No point in it. Mafia - Looking for doc or (maybe) psychologist to take them out early on. EA - After there had been a plan or two pushed for that included the psychologist breadcrumbing their role, this makes perfect sense. Maybe the psych is an inexperienced player who did it before understanding how the plan was detrimental, or maybe they're an experienced player who did the same. EA wants to remove the only barrier to their win condition as soon as possible. Visit the psych, and you've reduced the number of sane players by 1 and also prevented future obstacles. The psych is the only one likely to have breadcrumbed (except mafia :p ) and now that the doc is dead the EA is the only one likely to be looking for it. So the only two roles that it actually seems reasonable to spend so much time searching for crumbs are anti-town. Even in games as mafia when I was searching for crumbs to find blue roles I never spent that much time, and in this setup there are no hugely anti-mafia power roles. As far as mafia is concerned, the psych helps them if they are visited by EA. This is the only logical conclusion. Jackal found JeeJee's post, and figured he could gain some town cred by pointing it out. Why can't any role go through and try to figure out who's who? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 30 2011 10:33 Cyber_Cheese wrote: I'm thinking we should ##Visit Chaos13 because of these two posts That's the whole point, it's like extra details we can help turn into a case against him Why can't any role go through and try to figure out who's who? ##Vote Chaos13 | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 31 2011 03:25 chaos13 wrote: You're doing an excellent job of voting for me with no explanation and completely ignoring my request to pressure me if you think I'm suspicious. If you want to vote for me, don't leave the information where it's at. Ask me questions and see if my responses are still scummy. Point out the mafia/EA objectives I have been pushing this game. If at the end of the day I'm still your #1 suspect, so be it. Don't do a one-liner vote. Take a second look at who I quoted | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
I haven't got much time to properly analyse the game at the moment because I'm using a mobile device at a mates at the moment, so I'll move my vote to where it seems most wanted so we don't burn another extension. ##Unvote ##Vote MrWiggles | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Wow i had wiggles pegged as the psych because of that plan at the start... Which is why i didnt vote him sooner and accused ferryman of ea On September 02 2011 01:12 Forumite wrote: Tnkted, in this case it appears that you are part of a voting pattern. Normally there shouldn´t be any, at least not one that is easy to find, but I found something that looked like a pattern, and it lead us to one scum. It also leads to you, which makes me think you are scum too. The FoS from JeeJee was his way of distancing himself from you two immediately after getting under fire for his breadcrumb. He mentioned you two by names, you were the first two to jump on it, maybe because of just this reason, so you would get some towncred for agreeing with a scum-lynch. If distancing yourself on trial from other scum is scum 101, distancing yourself from an innocent is scum 102 Not saying its likely, just saying the distancing might be fake | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 02 2011 03:47 Jackal58 wrote: Erandorr is being replaced for not voting. He's not being modkilled, he's being replaced. I think that says something about what Erandorr is. I'm reading the OP, and it says mod killed people within a time frame will be replaced, but never specifies a time frame specifically if I'm not mistaken. I don't think we can actually act on this with any definite measure. I do however think we should lynch whoever takes over Erandorr, because it will be very hard to get an accurate read on a new person in Erandorr's shoes. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
##Visit Kurumi If Kurumi's psych, then ##Visit Eiii | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
I know, we've been doing visit votes for the psychs at night time. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 02 2011 18:20 Eiii wrote: I don't understand this logic. It's pointless to assume that, because all the deaths so far have been sane, that the EA hasn't been sending in night actions. So trying to use that justification to show that the EA is a lurker when you could just point out that EA's best chance at winning is to fly under the radar for as long as possible seems just as pointless. It's almost like he's trying to downplay the EA's threat level | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Someone insane had to die some time Chaos seems like an odd choice I checked the Chaos filter, I'm leaning towards the idea that tnkted killed him, either him or Jackal, based solely off accusations Chaos made before he died. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 03 2011 12:02 Jackal58 wrote: Tnkted is most likely the remaining scum. I think our vote today should go on the most likely EA candidate don't you? Won't the day be extended either way? ##Vote Tnkted | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
for the psych vote tonight I'm thinking ##Visit Sevryn Or whoever his replacement is anyway. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 05 2011 07:39 Jackal58 wrote: Keeping the psych alive by having him visit people he's already visited and knows are not the EA keeps him alive and keeps you from winning. It has a chance of keeping him alive sure, there is no guarantee. If we find and lynch the EA, insane people aren't a problem. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 04 2011 23:53 wherebugsgo wrote: LOL. Jackal not dead yet = definitely not a townie. Also upon reading the first several pages Cyber is either really stupid or really scum/third party. On September 06 2011 01:18 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Hmmm that's interesting, wherebugsgo accused jackal and died that night Note that I said interesting, it's not necessarily incriminating because it's much more likely he died for threatening to publish reads. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 27 2011 08:05 Erandorr wrote: palmar that town read of yours... how strong is it? Asking the person defending Tnkted, who dies that night On August 29 2011 07:30 Erandorr wrote: oh ##vote jeejee, completely forgot that part. looks like we might get a majority for him after all! He was among the last to vote on this one The final thing I would like to bring to note is his constant promises to post a write-up but never actually doing it. As for his replacement: On September 02 2011 05:36 Kurumi wrote: Hello I am Kurumi and I am replacing a scummy lurker, I will answer all questions You might have tomorrow after I read the thread. Note that for someone replacing a scummy lurker, Kurumi hasn't contributed much to convince us otherwise, but he was fourth (5 req) on the Tnkted bandwagon with: On September 03 2011 20:27 Kurumi wrote: Oh also, I've read the most important parts of the thread so I know tnkted is scum. ##vote: tnkted ##Vote Kurumi On September 06 2011 02:58 Forumite wrote: Nightkills is not a reliable way of finding scum, it´s mostly WIFOM. Kurumi, could you tell us what you think about the game so far, and where you think the Scum and EA hide? Yeah your right, I actually think Kurumi's the EA though and forgot to change up that first Erandorr bit, that point should have been more along the lines of trying to fit in as a townie. If he were mafia, I doubt he would have tried to bus Wiggles quite that hard. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Everything under the vote was new, the rest is unchanged | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 07 2011 07:55 Forumite wrote: With 6 players left, we need 4 votes to lynch today. Tomorrow, it´s 5 players, and we will still need 4 votes to lynch. We need to be, if not sure, then at least united, if we want to lynch. I had a town-read on Navillus for a long time, but I´ve been wrong before in this game. Navillus doesn´t want to lynch lurkers, but Erandorr is/was a lurker, and an unknown read because of it. Voteanalysis doesn´t help here much either. Eiii, what do you think? Cyber, what´s your read on Navillus? I have Navillus pegged as a townie too, I really don't think he's EA at the moment. I think Jackal is probably a townie, and out of the remaining three Forumite you are the most likely townie. Eiii has been lurking much more hardcore than I'd like, and Erandorr/Kurumi isn't much better I see more potential for Eiii to get lynched today, so I'm changing my vote off Kurumi for now. On August 28 2011 08:28 Eiii wrote: I don't like lynching jeejee for a supposed 'hey guys i'm scum lol' breadcrumb in one of his posts. I DO like lynching him because he kept his vote on CC and was one of the few who forced a nolynch yesterday. so let's do this ##vote JeeJee Note that this was the fifth vote, he didn't vote wiggles the day before All his votes follow this bandwagoning, and his filter is a single page with most of them more or less equating to fluff. ##Unvote ##Vote Eiii | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 06 2011 22:42 Kurumi wrote: Navillus wants to lynch active people and leave lurkers alone. This isn't town agenda, You know that? I know my alignment, I belive Jackal about his alignment, Forumite seems town. Navillus was rarely active, his reasons are not townish (aka fake/bad/seem like policy lynches) and Eiii just "ignored" the game. I think scum will rather go full lurk mode in present situation and wait for things, while 3rd party will try to do everything to call suspicion somewhere else / distract town from themselves and give them more time for their objective. Notice how the second half of his post describes the first half? Add to that he hasn't voted yet and it's awfully suspicious. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
didn't someone get saved from a no vote by the first extension? and don't we have a second extension? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=257133¤tpage=14#280 | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=257133¤tpage=10#183 | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 08 2011 01:42 Forumite wrote: GM removed the rule about extensions quite recently. Blue post, I saw it. Oh sorry, my mistake I forgot about that, just for the record, it was http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=257133¤tpage=35#694 | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
| ||