• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:48
CEST 06:48
KST 13:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202538Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up1LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments3[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced55
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up Serral wins EWC 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Interview with Chris "ChanmanV" Chan Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars
Brood War
General
Nobody gona talk about this year crazy qualifiers? [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder How do the new Battle.net ranks translate? BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread 9/11 Anniversary Possible Al Qaeda Attack on 9/11 Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 591 users

Cosmic Horror Mafia

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-20 20:22:15
August 20 2011 20:13 GMT
#9
/in

a town with no detection? interesting...
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 23 2011 16:49 GMT
#63
We have no investigative roles, the way I see it our best chance is to vote for people from the get-go
That said

##Vote: Navillus

Because he was the first person to talk about being a townie.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 23 2011 16:52 GMT
#64
Wait, on second thought I'm going to

##Unvote

##Vote: Navillus

If he feels the need to convince Jackal he's a townie, I think it's more likely that he's not actually a townie.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 23 2011 16:52 GMT
#65
DERP

##Unvote

##Vote: Palmar

Didn't edit the name when I copy pasta'd it.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 23 2011 18:29 GMT
#80
There is no reason to claim psychologist, we need him to cure doc if doc goes mad, but the horror will obviously go straight for him post-claim, cause a suicide and that's the end of the eldritch's problems
And the doc can't reveal because the mafia will target him

Wait, didn't someone say something about the doc debuff being cancelled because of the extra mafia? Or was that not official? And while I'm talking about a docs powers, doc cant heal the psychologist from suicide can he?

as far as I can tell, this is a game of all claiming townie and praying the lynches work in our favour
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 23 2011 18:37 GMT
#84
On August 24 2011 03:21 Sevryn wrote:
What if we just have everyone claim they checked someone everyday
so that way the psych doesn't have to claim but when he dies we can go back and see who he has checked.


the only flaw being the possibility for the horror to visit the psych instead of vice-versa making someone else look guilty
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 23 2011 18:38 GMT
#85
On August 24 2011 03:35 Hesmyrr wrote:
@Cyber_Cheese
Show nested quote +
Wait, didn't someone say something about the doc debuff being cancelled because of the extra mafia? Or was that not official? And while I'm talking about a docs powers, doc cant heal the psychologist from suicide can he?

You don't have to care about that. All the role details shown on the OP are 100% correct, such as this:
Show nested quote +
Every night you can protect one player against mafia NK

@Jackal58
Show nested quote +
1. Sanity is used in this game. Unless your role PM specifically states so, you will not be notified when your sanity changes mid-game. All players at beginning of the game are guaranteed to be sane.


oops, thanks for that
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 12:13 GMT
#139
The town has no way of knowing for sure who is the mafia nor the eldritch horror.
It starts 9v3v1, assuming the mafia manage to hit town it's only ever going to go downhill unless we lynch and get lucky and/or someones percieved slip up is actually that.
I'm thinking the plan to mention who we visited (even if we didn't) is better than nothing because *if* the psych happens to die there is a remote chance he did actually visit the horror
That said, I'm going to kick things off and say I'm going to visit Erandorr, I advise everybody to choose someone and do the same.

I never actually believed Palmar was anti-town, but there was an arguement against him and I didn't want to not lynch, so
##Unvote

Now, having read up to this point, one person seems to be pushing the identity of the horror rather too strongly, don't you think?
I'm thinking he's panicked from getting the third party role and tried to pin the blame on someone else from the get-go
##Vote: TheFerryman

Note how Ferryman used examples of wiggles from other games, despite this being his first? I think he was likely looking at other games to see how a third party faction should be played, and just happened to come up with some 'evidence' that wiggles could be used as a scapegoat.

Also I don't really think meta-arguements should be used, keep it within what's been said this game.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 12:15 GMT
#141
If some people want an
##extension
I have nothing against it.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 12:19 GMT
#143
I find it strange that Tnkted found more reason to vote for Palmar than Navillus, and in fact let Navillus' whole first post slide.
Am I alone here?
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 12:51 GMT
#148
While I still think Ferryman is the horror from my arguement on the bottom of the last page, it makes more sense to go mafia hunting instead, so:

##Unvote

##Vote: Tnkted

He mentioned something about a newbie mistake as coverup for Navillus, but that would be a newbie mistake for someone playing mafia more so than someone on town.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 16:40 GMT
#156
I believe it's in towns best interests to randomly lynch from the get-go, as I've stated a few times in now, so I've been following bandwagons to try and put a lynch through
If I happen to be lynched because of it, so be it, at least towns not wasting a chance to lynch
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 17:03 GMT
#158
Alright sorry for actually mentioning visiting someone, didn't see the cons on breadcrumbing

Breadcrumbing summary:
The doc lies so mafia cant backtrack who healed the person they attacked accurately... so the doc cant breadcrumb

The rest of town feign visiting and psych tells the truth because the psych is our best lead on finding the horror
The forseen problem with that was that the EH would know who 'visited' them and if they didn't die, would know they were not worth a visit

So what if town agreed to which person the psych visits anonymously?
e.g. town agrees that psych should visit (I don't know, me?) and if the psych turns up dead we can assume hes (I'm in this case) the EH
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 17:28 GMT
#163
On August 25 2011 02:20 Forumite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 02:03 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Alright sorry for actually mentioning visiting someone, didn't see the cons on breadcrumbing

Breadcrumbing summary:
The doc lies so mafia cant backtrack who healed the person they attacked accurately... so the doc cant breadcrumb

The rest of town feign visiting and psych tells the truth because the psych is our best lead on finding the horror
The forseen problem with that was that the EH would know who 'visited' them and if they didn't die, would know they were not worth a visit

So what if town agreed to which person the psych visits anonymously?
e.g. town agrees that psych should visit (I don't know, me?) and if the psych turns up dead we can assume hes (I'm in this case) the EH

If players lie in breadcrumbing, then we get WIFOM and confusion. The doc can´t point at his breadcrumbs in case he is going to get lynched, so he´ll probably get lynched precisely because his breadcrumbs don´t add up with what is happening in the game. Scum and EA will analyse breadcrumbs, either getting valuable info, or a good alibi, which the Blues can´t contradict without outing themselves. It will create a mess, and we don´t want a mess.


I'm saying town should agree on who the psych should visit and no-one should breadcrumb themselves
essentially turning psych into a group role to avoid the being singled out as did/did not visit
psych dying could correlate to a) psych visited horror, b) horror visited psych or c) mafia attacked psych
if psyche is sane when he dies, we can rule out c, but c could happen the same night as a or b
if we don't know who the psych visits, we don't get any information on who EH might be, if we do, it's a 50/50
I'm pretty sure we're better off with the 50/50
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 17:31 GMT
#164
On August 25 2011 02:27 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 02:07 Forumite wrote:
On August 25 2011 01:49 JeeJee wrote:
On August 24 2011 21:51 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
While I still think Ferryman is the horror from my arguement on the bottom of the last page, it makes more sense to go mafia hunting instead, so:


NO IT DOESNT. the most optimal play for town is to lynch EA day one. second most optimal is to lynch scum. this screams distancing himself from ferryman / setup for a future scenario.

JeeJee, could you please explain how you reasoning here?


if we kill EA, night is skipped


My apologies, I forgot that.

##Unvote

##Vote MrWiggles

just for references sake, i made a list

posts so far since the game started
1. Mr. Wiggles 5
2. Cyber_Cheese 12
3. Sevryn 8
4. TheFerryman 12
5. chaos13 5
6. Palmar 14
7. Navillus 5
8. Eiii 2
9. JeeJee 2
10. Jackal58 11
11. Forumite 8
12. Erandorr 11
13. tnkted 18

both of eiii's were spent accusing palmar
scum tend to stay really quiet on sc2 mafia, im not sure how forum mafia compares
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 17:46 GMT
#168
On August 25 2011 02:36 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 24 2011 21:13 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
The town has no way of knowing for sure who is the mafia nor the eldritch horror.
It starts 9v3v1, assuming the mafia manage to hit town it's only ever going to go downhill unless we lynch and get lucky and/or someones percieved slip up is actually that.
I'm thinking the plan to mention who we visited (even if we didn't) is better than nothing because *if* the psych happens to die there is a remote chance he did actually visit the horror
That said, I'm going to kick things off and say I'm going to visit Erandorr, I advise everybody to choose someone and do the same.

I never actually believed Palmar was anti-town, but there was an arguement against him and I didn't want to not lynch, so
##Unvote

Now, having read up to this point, one person seems to be pushing the identity of the horror rather too strongly, don't you think?
I'm thinking he's panicked from getting the third party role and tried to pin the blame on someone else from the get-go
##Vote: TheFerryman

Note how Ferryman used examples of wiggles from other games, despite this being his first? I think he was likely looking at other games to see how a third party faction should be played, and just happened to come up with some 'evidence' that wiggles could be used as a scapegoat.

Also I don't really think meta-arguements should be used, keep it within what's been said this game.
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 02:31 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On August 25 2011 02:27 JeeJee wrote:
On August 25 2011 02:07 Forumite wrote:
On August 25 2011 01:49 JeeJee wrote:
On August 24 2011 21:51 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
While I still think Ferryman is the horror from my arguement on the bottom of the last page, it makes more sense to go mafia hunting instead, so:


NO IT DOESNT. the most optimal play for town is to lynch EA day one. second most optimal is to lynch scum. this screams distancing himself from ferryman / setup for a future scenario.

JeeJee, could you please explain how you reasoning here?


if we kill EA, night is skipped


My apologies, I forgot that.

##Unvote

##Vote MrWiggles

just for references sake, i made a list

posts so far since the game started
1. Mr. Wiggles 5
2. Cyber_Cheese 12
3. Sevryn 8
4. TheFerryman 12
5. chaos13 5
6. Palmar 14
7. Navillus 5
8. Eiii 2
9. JeeJee 2
10. Jackal58 11
11. Forumite 8
12. Erandorr 11
13. tnkted 18

both of eiii's were spent accusing palmar
scum tend to stay really quiet on sc2 mafia, im not sure how forum mafia compares


So what made you change your mind so quick, when neither me nor ferryman posted between these? Rather contradictory, don't you think?


You've posted less, out of the two of you I'd rather ferryman based off that, and tnkted accusing me made me realise just how scummy I made myself look
In my experience with SC2 mafia, only weak town roles accuse each other on day 1 because if they turn out to be wrong they're only townies
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 18:46 GMT
#170
On August 25 2011 03:03 Forumite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 02:46 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On August 25 2011 02:36 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
On August 24 2011 21:13 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
The town has no way of knowing for sure who is the mafia nor the eldritch horror.
It starts 9v3v1, assuming the mafia manage to hit town it's only ever going to go downhill unless we lynch and get lucky and/or someones percieved slip up is actually that.
I'm thinking the plan to mention who we visited (even if we didn't) is better than nothing because *if* the psych happens to die there is a remote chance he did actually visit the horror
That said, I'm going to kick things off and say I'm going to visit Erandorr, I advise everybody to choose someone and do the same.

I never actually believed Palmar was anti-town, but there was an arguement against him and I didn't want to not lynch, so
##Unvote

Now, having read up to this point, one person seems to be pushing the identity of the horror rather too strongly, don't you think?
I'm thinking he's panicked from getting the third party role and tried to pin the blame on someone else from the get-go
##Vote: TheFerryman

Note how Ferryman used examples of wiggles from other games, despite this being his first? I think he was likely looking at other games to see how a third party faction should be played, and just happened to come up with some 'evidence' that wiggles could be used as a scapegoat.

Also I don't really think meta-arguements should be used, keep it within what's been said this game.
On August 25 2011 02:31 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On August 25 2011 02:27 JeeJee wrote:
On August 25 2011 02:07 Forumite wrote:
On August 25 2011 01:49 JeeJee wrote:
On August 24 2011 21:51 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
While I still think Ferryman is the horror from my arguement on the bottom of the last page, it makes more sense to go mafia hunting instead, so:


NO IT DOESNT. the most optimal play for town is to lynch EA day one. second most optimal is to lynch scum. this screams distancing himself from ferryman / setup for a future scenario.

JeeJee, could you please explain how you reasoning here?


if we kill EA, night is skipped


My apologies, I forgot that.

##Unvote

##Vote MrWiggles

just for references sake, i made a list

posts so far since the game started
1. Mr. Wiggles 5
2. Cyber_Cheese 12
3. Sevryn 8
4. TheFerryman 12
5. chaos13 5
6. Palmar 14
7. Navillus 5
8. Eiii 2
9. JeeJee 2
10. Jackal58 11
11. Forumite 8
12. Erandorr 11
13. tnkted 18

both of eiii's were spent accusing palmar
scum tend to stay really quiet on sc2 mafia, im not sure how forum mafia compares


So what made you change your mind so quick, when neither me nor ferryman posted between these? Rather contradictory, don't you think?


You've posted less, out of the two of you I'd rather ferryman based off that, and tnkted accusing me made me realise just how scummy I made myself look
In my experience with SC2 mafia, only weak town roles accuse each other on day 1 because if they turn out to be wrong they're only townies

So in your opinion, Wiggles and Ferryman are probably Scum?

It doesn´t really add up with your earlier post, Wiggles might have few posts, but they are HUGE, he´s only posting long analysis and policy posts. Ferryman is quite active, and drew a lot of attention to himself early. If you are looking for players trying to stay out of sight, they look like very bad choices.

at the moment, i'm believing wiggles is the horror
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-24 21:28:01
August 24 2011 21:27 GMT
#181
for as long as we're at jokes
+ Show Spoiler +
A journalist interviews a farmer :
- You have a very nice field, and a good number of cows, do you get a good production out of it ?
- Yes, yes ! mostly from the white cows.
- Not from the black ?
- Oh yes, from the black too !
- They seem very calm
- They are very calm, mostly the white.
- The black cows aren't ?
- Yes, the black are very calm too !
- Do they make a good milk ?
- Yes, mainly the white.
- The black don't ?
- Oh, yes, they do too.
- Sir I don't understand, why do you always refere to this white cows then ?
- Well, listen to me. It's because the white cows are mine.
- The black aren't ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Show Spoiler +
- Yes, they are also mine


oops, forgot i wasnt meant to edit, apologies, spoilered the ending
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 21:33 GMT
#182
On August 25 2011 02:35 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 02:28 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On August 25 2011 02:20 Forumite wrote:
On August 25 2011 02:03 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Alright sorry for actually mentioning visiting someone, didn't see the cons on breadcrumbing

Breadcrumbing summary:
The doc lies so mafia cant backtrack who healed the person they attacked accurately... so the doc cant breadcrumb

The rest of town feign visiting and psych tells the truth because the psych is our best lead on finding the horror
The forseen problem with that was that the EH would know who 'visited' them and if they didn't die, would know they were not worth a visit

So what if town agreed to which person the psych visits anonymously?
e.g. town agrees that psych should visit (I don't know, me?) and if the psych turns up dead we can assume hes (I'm in this case) the EH

If players lie in breadcrumbing, then we get WIFOM and confusion. The doc can´t point at his breadcrumbs in case he is going to get lynched, so he´ll probably get lynched precisely because his breadcrumbs don´t add up with what is happening in the game. Scum and EA will analyse breadcrumbs, either getting valuable info, or a good alibi, which the Blues can´t contradict without outing themselves. It will create a mess, and we don´t want a mess.


I'm saying town should agree on who the psych should visit and no-one should breadcrumb themselves
essentially turning psych into a group role to avoid the being singled out as did/did not visit
psych dying could correlate to a) psych visited horror, b) horror visited psych or c) mafia attacked psych
if psyche is sane when he dies, we can rule out c, but c could happen the same night as a or b
if we don't know who the psych visits, we don't get any information on who EH might be, if we do, it's a 50/50
I'm pretty sure we're better off with the 50/50


what do you suggest happens if we all vote for psych to visit himself?

p.s. it's not 50-50 just because there's 2 possibilities. it's like, the odds of anything happening are 50-50 because it either happens or it doesn't.


this raises a question
Can visiting roles choose to do nothing?
If so, the ideas good and psych sits at home
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 22:43 GMT
#192
On August 25 2011 06:25 TheFerryman wrote:
Making lists is a great way to contribute without contributing, and in this post you go and point out that Eiii is lurking and then vote for wiggles. While indicating mafia like to lurk, you either aren't reading what you write or you just wanted to post without thinking. Either way, its poor play, I expect you to remedy that asap, also I want you to explain why you voted wiggles.


For the purposes of this post, Elritch Horror = EH
Based on the arguments so far, I believe wiggles to be the EH
I'm not a fan of meta arguments at all, if someone were to slip up it should be a mistake they made completely in-game
As for why wiggles when I suspect someone as scum?
There are 4 things that can happen if we lynch:
1) The person is a townie 7/13, it's not a real loss comparatively, bad but still acceptable
2) The person is a power role (Doc/Psych) 2/13, much worse off for town
3) The person is mafia 3/13, this is acceptable, not the best solution but a good one
4) The person is EH 1/13, night is skipped and we stand at essentially a 12p game, psyche is as good as townie, and it's a 96H day
5) No-one, the game proceeds to night, I'll go into this below

On any of the first three, we can analyse the people who put the person up there and potentially narrow down our list of suspects.
Of note, and assuming that the towns intelligent choices don't allow the vote to get deflected by the mafia such that all 13 people have an equal chance (It's potentially the other way around), losing a power role is half as likely as killing a scum.

Now on to the night, EH first, 5 possibilities, all fractions are based off no-lynches
1) He chooses mafia, 1/4, town is unaffected
2) He chooses Townie, 7/12, again no effect
3) He chooses Doc, Doc might now kill someone he deemed important enough to heal tonight
4) He chooses Psych, psych promptly dies
5) Psych heals the EH's target later, I estimate this at 11/12*1/11, since there's an 11/12 chance the Psych isn't the target with the EH and a 1/11 it's the correct one, this is 1/12, roughly 8.3% (wow what that's back to 1/12?! Is my math right?)

5 isn't possible if the town votes for Psychs target unless EH is stupid, I argued this being a good idea earlier, I still stand by that.

The mafia will do one of 5 things (I was about to ask if mafia would know the reason their attack failed, doc heal verses EH, but they know if they go insane and if doc heal saved the target so it's elementary)
1) The mafia hit the EH, they know who he is now and have no reason to kill him, in fact they potentially benefit keeping him alive so a night is not skipped
2) The mafia hit a Townie, 7/10, someone who was nowhere near the towns focus is killed more than likely and nothing good comes of it
3) The mafia hit the Doc, 1/10, bad night
4) The mafia hit the Psych. 1/10, potentially just as bad
5) Doc heals the victim, 9/10*9/12*1/9, person is known to be town, 9/12 being the docs non-scum targets, 9/10 is the doc not being the one hit, 1/9 is the chance of a correct choice, which becomes 3/40, or 7.5% (Again, math check)

Note that some combinations of the above are worse than others
Under which circumstances did we gain information overnight?
There's a 3/40 that the doctors save will occur (the chance worked out the same it was the horror that got hit, at this point I distrust my math more so than ever, saddening for a student engineer but I digress)
There's a 1/12 that we know the person psych visited isn't the EH, assuming we know who the psych visited, halve this because there is an equal chance the EH visited him, and a 1/144 of the optimal both
if we add 3/40 and 1/12, there is about 16% chance something good happened overnight without a lynch, whereas there is a 31% chance we hang a scum
note that the former percentage would go up if the lynching isn't the doc/psych

This is why I am pushing for a lynch so hard.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 22:50 GMT
#193
On August 25 2011 06:51 Erandorr wrote:
I probably should explain : Notice how bad Cyber has been playing before, note then that he didnt answer any of my accusations and found the one point in my post that could be used as a deversion.
Either he is really , really shitty town or badly playing SCUM/ EA


I believe town is best off lynching somebody, as I've stated before, if my pushing to lynch somebody makes me that somebody, so be it I had it coming.

On August 25 2011 06:54 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 06:33 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On August 25 2011 02:35 JeeJee wrote:
On August 25 2011 02:28 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On August 25 2011 02:20 Forumite wrote:
On August 25 2011 02:03 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Alright sorry for actually mentioning visiting someone, didn't see the cons on breadcrumbing

Breadcrumbing summary:
The doc lies so mafia cant backtrack who healed the person they attacked accurately... so the doc cant breadcrumb

The rest of town feign visiting and psych tells the truth because the psych is our best lead on finding the horror
The forseen problem with that was that the EH would know who 'visited' them and if they didn't die, would know they were not worth a visit

So what if town agreed to which person the psych visits anonymously?
e.g. town agrees that psych should visit (I don't know, me?) and if the psych turns up dead we can assume hes (I'm in this case) the EH

If players lie in breadcrumbing, then we get WIFOM and confusion. The doc can´t point at his breadcrumbs in case he is going to get lynched, so he´ll probably get lynched precisely because his breadcrumbs don´t add up with what is happening in the game. Scum and EA will analyse breadcrumbs, either getting valuable info, or a good alibi, which the Blues can´t contradict without outing themselves. It will create a mess, and we don´t want a mess.


I'm saying town should agree on who the psych should visit and no-one should breadcrumb themselves
essentially turning psych into a group role to avoid the being singled out as did/did not visit
psych dying could correlate to a) psych visited horror, b) horror visited psych or c) mafia attacked psych
if psyche is sane when he dies, we can rule out c, but c could happen the same night as a or b
if we don't know who the psych visits, we don't get any information on who EH might be, if we do, it's a 50/50
I'm pretty sure we're better off with the 50/50


what do you suggest happens if we all vote for psych to visit himself?

p.s. it's not 50-50 just because there's 2 possibilities. it's like, the odds of anything happening are 50-50 because it either happens or it doesn't.


this raises a question
Can visiting roles choose to do nothing?
If so, the ideas good and psych sits at home


this raises a better question
why do you keep bringing up this idea of coordinating a psych decision?

*everyone votes for psych to visit A*
*psych has committed suicide*
"Ah, A must be EA!"
*Lynch A*
*A is not EA because EA visited psych and not vice versa*

Now what?

you're here quite often, you make a lot of posts. but all i'm seeing is that you want to kill someone, and you don't care who as long as it's not yourself. i'm seeing useless lists and pushing flawed plans. i'm seeing nonsense.

##vote:cyber cheese


As opposed to what? psyche dying and us having no clue as to who?
for someone opposed to random lynching, the 50/50 on the person being EH this presents should look more appealing than 4/11 (assuming both mafia got a kill and psych died to EH overnight, maybe even 4/10 if we lynch today and it's town)
granted there are more variables to consider than just those there, but I'm telling you that 50/50 is potentially the best it is going to get.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 22:52 GMT
#194
On August 25 2011 07:41 TheFerryman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 07:33 Navillus wrote:
Ferryman would you be open to lynching cyber today then wiggles?

No, because I'm pretty sure wiggles is the EH, and if we lynch the EH we get a free day. I also have yet to see people build a real case that proves he is mafia, so far all I have seen is "he has played stupid", witch brings us back to the rule of thumb.

If you are going to lynch cyber I want someone who is going to take responsibility for the lynch, rather than have a bunch of people push a green lynch and then say "he was stupid anyway, its his fault" and no-one ends up being responsible.

You want him lynched Navillus? Are you willing to own up to it if he flips green? Why is the case against him more convincing than the case against wiggles?


Tnkted was the first to vote against me, given that he's been considered suspicious already I would definitely hold him to blame in that scenario
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 23:12 GMT
#199
On August 25 2011 07:52 TheFerryman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 07:43 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On August 25 2011 06:25 TheFerryman wrote:
Making lists is a great way to contribute without contributing, and in this post you go and point out that Eiii is lurking and then vote for wiggles. While indicating mafia like to lurk, you either aren't reading what you write or you just wanted to post without thinking. Either way, its poor play, I expect you to remedy that asap, also I want you to explain why you voted wiggles.


For the purposes of this post, Elritch Horror = EH
Based on the arguments so far, I believe wiggles to be the EH
I'm not a fan of meta arguments at all, if someone were to slip up it should be a mistake they made completely in-game
As for why wiggles when I suspect someone as scum?
There are 4 things that can happen if we lynch:
1) The person is a townie 7/13, it's not a real loss comparatively, bad but still acceptable
2) The person is a power role (Doc/Psych) 2/13, much worse off for town
3) The person is mafia 3/13, this is acceptable, not the best solution but a good one
4) The person is EH 1/13, night is skipped and we stand at essentially a 12p game, psyche is as good as townie, and it's a 96H day
5) No-one, the game proceeds to night, I'll go into this below

On any of the first three, we can analyse the people who put the person up there and potentially narrow down our list of suspects.
Of note, and assuming that the towns intelligent choices don't allow the vote to get deflected by the mafia such that all 13 people have an equal chance (It's potentially the other way around), losing a power role is half as likely as killing a scum.

Now on to the night, EH first, 5 possibilities, all fractions are based off no-lynches
1) He chooses mafia, 1/4, town is unaffected
2) He chooses Townie, 7/12, again no effect
3) He chooses Doc, Doc might now kill someone he deemed important enough to heal tonight
4) He chooses Psych, psych promptly dies
5) Psych heals the EH's target later, I estimate this at 11/12*1/11, since there's an 11/12 chance the Psych isn't the target with the EH and a 1/11 it's the correct one, this is 1/12, roughly 8.3% (wow what that's back to 1/12?! Is my math right?)

5 isn't possible if the town votes for Psychs target unless EH is stupid, I argued this being a good idea earlier, I still stand by that.

The mafia will do one of 5 things (I was about to ask if mafia would know the reason their attack failed, doc heal verses EH, but they know if they go insane and if doc heal saved the target so it's elementary)
1) The mafia hit the EH, they know who he is now and have no reason to kill him, in fact they potentially benefit keeping him alive so a night is not skipped
2) The mafia hit a Townie, 7/10, someone who was nowhere near the towns focus is killed more than likely and nothing good comes of it
3) The mafia hit the Doc, 1/10, bad night
4) The mafia hit the Psych. 1/10, potentially just as bad
5) Doc heals the victim, 9/10*9/12*1/9, person is known to be town, 9/12 being the docs non-scum targets, 9/10 is the doc not being the one hit, 1/9 is the chance of a correct choice, which becomes 3/40, or 7.5% (Again, math check)

Note that some combinations of the above are worse than others
Under which circumstances did we gain information overnight?
There's a 3/40 that the doctors save will occur (the chance worked out the same it was the horror that got hit, at this point I distrust my math more so than ever, saddening for a student engineer but I digress)
There's a 1/12 that we know the person psych visited isn't the EH, assuming we know who the psych visited, halve this because there is an equal chance the EH visited him, and a 1/144 of the optimal both
if we add 3/40 and 1/12, there is about 16% chance something good happened overnight without a lynch, whereas there is a 31% chance we hang a scum
note that the former percentage would go up if the lynching isn't the doc/psych

This is why I am pushing for a lynch so hard.


Funny, I thought you said you thought I was the EH. What changed your mind?

Also all those numbers are irrelevant, we know we have to lynch, and no one is going to allow a no-lynch to happen. That does *not* mean jumping on every possible vote that happens. You are the current voteleader, should we all vote for you as to not risk the possibility of a no lynch? Or should we look for the EH or scum and make our lynch count? Remember if we lynch a townie we bring the mafia a step closer to victory.

Think before posting, lynching correctly is vital, and jumping on every bandwagon isn't going to achieve that. We could all pull a number out of a hat to pick who we lynch, how would that help bring us closer to victory? Of course not, it would provide no information, its the same deal with easy bandwagons, mafia can easaly blend in with arguments like the one you are making "oh, I didn't think he was mafia, but hey, I did it to avoid a no-lynch"

Your justification is poor to say the least, step up your game. What made you change your mind about me being the EH? If you really think I am it is your duty to write an analysis that proves it and sell it to the rest of the town.

You don't want to lynch anyone, just for the sake of lynching, you want to lynch scum. Otherwise you aren't town.


At the moment, the current evidence points to wiggles as the EH. Rest assured that if/when it's wrong I'll be making a full post on why your the real EH.
Until the first lynch or two, we have no clear-cut way of determining who the mafia is, after that point we can see who defended the innocent/guilty person and analyse from there
I'm not quite sure at what point you convinced yourself that the band wagoning I was doing wasn't directed at people I believed to be scum
It would be in the eldritchs best interests to discredit the people who accuse him wouldn't it?
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 23:16 GMT
#200
On August 25 2011 08:09 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 07:43 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On August 25 2011 06:25 TheFerryman wrote:
Making lists is a great way to contribute without contributing, and in this post you go and point out that Eiii is lurking and then vote for wiggles. While indicating mafia like to lurk, you either aren't reading what you write or you just wanted to post without thinking. Either way, its poor play, I expect you to remedy that asap, also I want you to explain why you voted wiggles.


For the purposes of this post, Elritch Horror = EH
Based on the arguments so far, I believe wiggles to be the EH
I'm not a fan of meta arguments at all, if someone were to slip up it should be a mistake they made completely in-game
As for why wiggles when I suspect someone as scum?
There are 4 things that can happen if we lynch:
1) The person is a townie 7/13, it's not a real loss comparatively, bad but still acceptable
2) The person is a power role (Doc/Psych) 2/13, much worse off for town
3) The person is mafia 3/13, this is acceptable, not the best solution but a good one
4) The person is EH 1/13, night is skipped and we stand at essentially a 12p game, psyche is as good as townie, and it's a 96H day
5) No-one, the game proceeds to night, I'll go into this below

On any of the first three, we can analyse the people who put the person up there and potentially narrow down our list of suspects.
Of note, and assuming that the towns intelligent choices don't allow the vote to get deflected by the mafia such that all 13 people have an equal chance (It's potentially the other way around), losing a power role is half as likely as killing a scum.

Now on to the night, EH first, 5 possibilities, all fractions are based off no-lynches
1) He chooses mafia, 1/4, town is unaffected
2) He chooses Townie, 7/12, again no effect
3) He chooses Doc, Doc might now kill someone he deemed important enough to heal tonight
4) He chooses Psych, psych promptly dies
5) Psych heals the EH's target later, I estimate this at 11/12*1/11, since there's an 11/12 chance the Psych isn't the target with the EH and a 1/11 it's the correct one, this is 1/12, roughly 8.3% (wow what that's back to 1/12?! Is my math right?)

5 isn't possible if the town votes for Psychs target unless EH is stupid, I argued this being a good idea earlier, I still stand by that.

The mafia will do one of 5 things (I was about to ask if mafia would know the reason their attack failed, doc heal verses EH, but they know if they go insane and if doc heal saved the target so it's elementary)
1) The mafia hit the EH, they know who he is now and have no reason to kill him, in fact they potentially benefit keeping him alive so a night is not skipped
2) The mafia hit a Townie, 7/10, someone who was nowhere near the towns focus is killed more than likely and nothing good comes of it
3) The mafia hit the Doc, 1/10, bad night
4) The mafia hit the Psych. 1/10, potentially just as bad
5) Doc heals the victim, 9/10*9/12*1/9, person is known to be town, 9/12 being the docs non-scum targets, 9/10 is the doc not being the one hit, 1/9 is the chance of a correct choice, which becomes 3/40, or 7.5% (Again, math check)

Note that some combinations of the above are worse than others
Under which circumstances did we gain information overnight?
There's a 3/40 that the doctors save will occur (the chance worked out the same it was the horror that got hit, at this point I distrust my math more so than ever, saddening for a student engineer but I digress)
There's a 1/12 that we know the person psych visited isn't the EH, assuming we know who the psych visited, halve this because there is an equal chance the EH visited him, and a 1/144 of the optimal both
if we add 3/40 and 1/12, there is about 16% chance something good happened overnight without a lynch, whereas there is a 31% chance we hang a scum
note that the former percentage would go up if the lynching isn't the doc/psych

This is why I am pushing for a lynch so hard.


tldr: lynching is good.
this is a pretty long and useless post indeed.
i'm not a fan of discussing plans or mechanics unless other people are jumping on a terrible idea. so cut it out and let's get back to discussing people.

why exactly do you think wiggles is EA? you haven't answered my earlier question about it.. "based on the arguments posted earlier" isn't an explanation.

and yes ferryman, I'd gladly take responsibility for cyber's lynch, which would include praise when he flips scum I assume.


Notice how ferryman made someone else take responsibility?
It's the one same thing he's been accusing MrWiggles of no less
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 23:17 GMT
#201
One of the same things*
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 23:20 GMT
#202
##Unvote

By way overwhelming amounts of accusations I'm going to cut back on the voting
I still say it's ferryman and I'll gladly be responsible for it if he's town, but I'll cast that vote later after anyone chooses to agree with me
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 23:42 GMT
#206
On August 25 2011 08:25 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 24 2011 01:49 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
##Vote: Navillus
Show nested quote +
On August 24 2011 01:52 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: Palmar
Show nested quote +
On August 24 2011 21:13 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: TheFerryman
Show nested quote +
On August 24 2011 21:51 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: Tnkted
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 02:31 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote MrWiggles

Please tell me what your actual scum reads are, with reasons. Do you still think that all the people you voted for are scum, or do you believe some of them to be town now? Why?


At the moment, my views hinge on two important people
1) If MrWiggles turns out not to be the eldritch, then I believe Ferryman to be the eldritch himself. On the off-chance Wiggles isn't the eldritch, then I believe Ferryman to be town, based off various arguments that Ferryman has made against wiggles.
2) If Tnkted is mafia, I believe Navillus to also be mafia because Tnkted chose to ignore what Navillus said at the start of day 1 about being a townie, before looking a few posts further and voting Palmar based off his joke, this would also make Palmar innocent in my eyes. Again, this is perfectly inversed.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 23:48 GMT
#211
While your looking into people that havn't said much:
Is it just me, or does Chaos keep talking about going into more detail while never actually doing so?

On August 24 2011 12:37 chaos13 wrote:
I haven't got time to devote to proper posting tonight. I've skimmed through everything so far, and I'm glad to see that the spam has cut down and we've got good discussion going.
My initial thoughts:
1. Palmar probably isn't scum. The case against him is claiming that a joke response was a scum slip.
2. People pushing for lynching Palmar based on the above are dumb or scum. If they've got a good reason (haven't seen any so far) then it's not suspicious.
3. tnkted is probably scum
4. Ferryman, you've got a great case on wiggles, but with one problem. You designed that case to prove that he's the EA. What you should be doing is analyzing and then figuring out what he is. Because it was the cause and not the effect, I'm not yet convinced by it.

I'll get something more detailed up tomorrow morning.

On August 24 2011 20:50 chaos13 wrote:
Erandorr, since you're around right now, what do you think of tnkted?
Was his accusation of Palmar warranted, and does the logic behind it make sense to you?

On August 24 2011 20:57 chaos13 wrote:
It's a 48 hour day cycle, isn't it? That's what the OP states.



On August 24 2011 20:59 chaos13 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2011 23:45 Hesmyrr wrote:

The deadline ends at August 25 2011 23:45 KST


And this. We've got another day still.

On August 24 2011 21:27 chaos13 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 24 2011 21:19 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I find it strange that Tnkted found more reason to vote for Palmar than Navillus, and in fact let Navillus' whole first post slide.
Am I alone here?


Not at all. However, I'm not always the best scumhunter, so I'd like to call on the analysis skills of Jackal58. Jackal, what do you think of tnkted's play so far in this game?

I'm also going to vote tnkted, since I can always change it later if need be.

##Vote: tnkted

The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 24 2011 23:49 GMT
#212
On August 25 2011 08:48 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 08:42 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On August 25 2011 08:25 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
On August 24 2011 01:49 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
##Vote: Navillus
On August 24 2011 01:52 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: Palmar
On August 24 2011 21:13 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: TheFerryman
On August 24 2011 21:51 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: Tnkted
On August 25 2011 02:31 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote MrWiggles

Please tell me what your actual scum reads are, with reasons. Do you still think that all the people you voted for are scum, or do you believe some of them to be town now? Why?


At the moment, my views hinge on two important people
1) If MrWiggles turns out not to be the eldritch, then I believe Ferryman to be the eldritch himself. On the off-chance Wiggles isn't the eldritch, then I believe Ferryman to be town, based off various arguments that Ferryman has made against wiggles.
2) If Tnkted is mafia, I believe Navillus to also be mafia because Tnkted chose to ignore what Navillus said at the start of day 1 about being a townie, before looking a few posts further and voting Palmar based off his joke, this would also make Palmar innocent in my eyes. Again, this is perfectly inversed.

You wanna redo that one champ.


Oh my mistake, it was supposed to signify one or the other.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 25 2011 00:09 GMT
#216
On August 25 2011 09:01 Navillus wrote:
I am going to focus on scumhunting because only a very bad EH would make it obvious enough who they are that we could correctly lynch them day 1. So first I would like to quickly draw attention to
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 07:41 TheFerryman wrote:If you are going to lynch cyber I want someone who is going to take responsibility for the lynch, rather than have a bunch of people push a green lynch and then say "he was stupid anyway, its his fault" and no-one ends up being responsible.

You want him lynched Navillus? Are you willing to own up to it if he flips green? Why is the case against him more convincing than the case against wiggles?

Now this is a standard scum play, let town accuse someone then set it up for the accuser to get lynched if the accused flips town this is illogical the full argument that you would need to accept to make this make sense includes it being impossible for a townie to mislynch, or to be wrong, I think we can all agree that this is not the case and this argument simply leads to what are essentially revenge lynches.

That said I think there are scummier people this game, namely Cyber_Cheese, it could be argued that he isn't scum just playing badly, I happen to think both are true, he's just supported too scummy things for me to let him go. He likes random lynching, is saying he's fine taking the lynch, (if he were actually fine with it that might be a town thing but in what I've read people saying that tend to be scum) he's jumped all over the place with his voting with very little reasoning, and overall I'm getting the sense from him that he's trying really hard to stay active, but is just throwing things out there without actually thinking about anything (see his random voting, the giant listing of fractions, and his joke) and in general this attempt to stay really active gives me a really guilty feel from him SO

##Vote Cyber_Cheese


So tl;dr you'd lynch me to promote lurker play?
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 25 2011 00:34 GMT
#218
If the last sentince of that paragraph was not "in general this attempt to stay really active gives me a really guilty feel from him SO"
You might have a point there, and the tl;dr i summized might actually be inaccurate
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 25 2011 01:12 GMT
#224
Ok, because I'm on the verge of being lynched I took an objective look over my posts, and realised something. The people least afraid of looking like scum are town, and in most games they don't even realise they are doing it. I've done the not caring a little bit too much apparently.
I would promote discussion on chaos and eiii before putting the nail in my coffin.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 25 2011 08:59 GMT
#241
well im going to be away a while
just in case i miss the deadline, im going to
##Vote Tnkted
for a few reasons
1) and lets start with the petty one, he's the one who first bought me up as a suspected scum, in an effort to save his own hide
2) I voted for him previously before stopping to vote for the EH, since im not sure which of wiggles or ferryman i believe to be EH more, Tnkted seems like a safer lynch option
3) Chaos made a pretty convincing post, and it wasn't the first of it's ilk
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 25 2011 12:24 GMT
#252
The more I think about it, the more I think Tnkted is much in the same boat that I put myself in to, he took his intial theory a little bit too far and spoke too much
That said, I'm keeping my vote on him because of two reasons:
1) He might actually be scum
2) I have to have a vote placed and he's still what I consider the safest bet
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 25 2011 12:33 GMT
#255
On August 25 2011 21:25 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 21:24 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
The more I think about it, the more I think Tnkted is much in the same boat that I put myself in to, he took his intial theory a little bit too far and spoke too much
That said, I'm keeping my vote on him because of two reasons:
1) He might actually be scum
2) I have to have a vote placed and he's still what I consider the safest bet


Why are you more concerned with not being wrong than killing scum?


Uh yea I see how it could come across that way in hindsight
I don't think he's innocent, I'm just saying I think he made himself look guilty in the same manner I did, more or less
And noones specifically come out to defend him either if i'm not mistaken
I'm looking for parallels that reflect in my play to learn the differences between sc2 and forum mafia as I go
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 25 2011 17:10 GMT
#287
Alright I hate to bring this up yet again, but I believe I've taken all the cons out of it in it's current implementation, and as such I fear it's been dismissed too soon

+ Show Spoiler [Breadcrumbing Revisited] +

The doc does not breadcrumb, straightforward.

The previous version was the rest of town feign visiting and psych tells the truth because the psych is our best lead on finding the horror
The forseen problem with that was that the EH would know who 'visited' them and if they didn't die, would know they were not worth a visit

So what if town agreed to which person the psych visits anonymously?
e.g. town agrees that psych should visit (I don't know, me?) and if the psych turns up dead we can assume hes (I'm in this case) the EH
I'm saying town should agree on who the psych should visit and no-one should breadcrumb themselves
essentially turning psych into a group role to avoid the being singled out as did/did not visit

psych dying could correlate to a) psych visited horror, b) horror visited psych or c) mafia attacked psych
if psyche is sane when he dies, we can rule out c, but c could happen the same night as a or b
if we don't know who the psych visits, we don't get any information on who EH might be, if we do, it's a 50/50
Bear in mind that if we can't prepare a strong argument for the person being the EH, we can still leave it at that and not lynch, and if we vote for the psych he can just not visit that night


Thoughts? Opinions?
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 26 2011 01:29 GMT
#310
On August 26 2011 06:49 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 26 2011 02:10 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Alright I hate to bring this up yet again, but I believe I've taken all the cons out of it in it's current implementation, and as such I fear it's been dismissed too soon

+ Show Spoiler [Breadcrumbing Revisited] +

The doc does not breadcrumb, straightforward.

The previous version was the rest of town feign visiting and psych tells the truth because the psych is our best lead on finding the horror
The forseen problem with that was that the EH would know who 'visited' them and if they didn't die, would know they were not worth a visit

So what if town agreed to which person the psych visits anonymously?
e.g. town agrees that psych should visit (I don't know, me?) and if the psych turns up dead we can assume hes (I'm in this case) the EH
I'm saying town should agree on who the psych should visit and no-one should breadcrumb themselves
essentially turning psych into a group role to avoid the being singled out as did/did not visit

psych dying could correlate to a) psych visited horror, b) horror visited psych or c) mafia attacked psych
if psyche is sane when he dies, we can rule out c, but c could happen the same night as a or b
if we don't know who the psych visits, we don't get any information on who EH might be, if we do, it's a 50/50
Bear in mind that if we can't prepare a strong argument for the person being the EH, we can still leave it at that and not lynch, and if we vote for the psych he can just not visit that night


Thoughts? Opinions?


on the caveat that you don't auto-lynch anyone if psych ends up suiciding, then it's workable to try and find out who is the EA. we could use the psych as an EA-cop. i'm in for this.

but you've been posting a lot about plans and not a lot about people, so what do you think about sevryn and palmar's unvote?


Since you asked: Sevryn is a person I consider to be in much the same boat as Eiii, with the whole lurking thing

On August 26 2011 09:45 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 26 2011 09:35 Sevryn wrote:
On August 26 2011 08:00 Jackal58 wrote:
Cyber cheese is on the right track. Kind of. Psych visit Mr. Wiggles. If Psych dies we lynch Wiggles. Now let's continue hunting scum.
If tnkted is scum so is Palmar and Sevryn. Lynch tnkted.

Nope Nope Nope Nope Nope.
Psych visit who you want to visit but if we tell the psych to visit Wiggles for one Wiggles is someone who has a higher chance than normal to be the EA IMO and by telling the Psych who to visit each day the EA visits someone else and his job of find the psych goes twice as fast making his win condition easier to fulfill.

yeah no, this doesn't apply to this variation at all. ea cannot assume that the person we tell the psych to visit isn't the psych. this variation is workable, provided we don't auto-lynch anyone just because psych suicides.


I've been looking through the arguments on breadcrumbing, having read the latest version I believe there are very few reasons that we should be saying the plan wouldn't work, but outright denying it?
It doesn't seem very pro-town to be outright trying to shutdown any plan which might make town create an organized way of searching for the EH.
Of note we should mention it was his idea that everybody breadcrumb and then we can check the psych when he dies, which would have been a resurrection of the original plan without actually removing much EH bias.
At the moment he doesn't particularly stand out overall, he needs more time in the spotlight to form anything solid.

As for palmars cancelled vote?
Both voting off someone you suspect to be a townie and using an extension day 1 are bad options, I don't really see it as much except him considering it the lesser of two evils, there is too much back and forth between him and tnkted. I think a real scum would have lynched Tnkted if he were innocent so we could bring it to night

And a freebie that wasn't in the question Ferryman seems to be clutching at straws now for lynching Wiggles, the whole EH thing doesn't work so he accuses him of mafia instead?
As a townie in wiggles shoes, would you have suggested that your a mafia when the accusations are of you being the EH? I don't know about you guys but the 'trap' definitely would have got me
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 26 2011 02:36 GMT
#312
On August 26 2011 10:42 Sevryn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 26 2011 10:27 JeeJee wrote:
On August 26 2011 10:20 Sevryn wrote:
On August 26 2011 09:45 JeeJee wrote:
On August 26 2011 09:35 Sevryn wrote:
On August 26 2011 08:00 Jackal58 wrote:
Cyber cheese is on the right track. Kind of. Psych visit Mr. Wiggles. If Psych dies we lynch Wiggles. Now let's continue hunting scum.
If tnkted is scum so is Palmar and Sevryn. Lynch tnkted.

Nope Nope Nope Nope Nope.
Psych visit who you want to visit but if we tell the psych to visit Wiggles for one Wiggles is someone who has a higher chance than normal to be the EA IMO and by telling the Psych who to visit each day the EA visits someone else and his job of find the psych goes twice as fast making his win condition easier to fulfill.

yeah no, this doesn't apply to this variation at all. ea cannot assume that the person we tell the psych to visit isn't the psych. this variation is workable, provided we don't auto-lynch anyone just because psych suicides.


On August 26 2011 08:35 Jackal58 wrote:
On August 26 2011 08:31 JeeJee wrote:
On August 26 2011 08:27 Jackal58 wrote:
I'll buy that Ferryman. Makes more sense to me than the EH push.

On August 26 2011 08:16 JeeJee wrote:
On August 26 2011 08:00 Jackal58 wrote:
Cyber cheese is on the right track. Kind of. Psych visit Mr. Wiggles. If Psych dies we lynch Wiggles. Now let's continue hunting scum.
If tnkted is scum so is Palmar and Sevryn. Lynch tnkted.


how is sevryn remotely related to tnkted?


Subtle disconnects.
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 25 2011 02:08 Sevryn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 01:40 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I believe it's in towns best interests to randomly lynch from the get-go, as I've stated a few times in now, so I've been following bandwagons to try and put a lynch through
If I happen to be lynched because of it, so be it, at least towns not wasting a chance to lynch

its in scums best interest for town to randomly lynch and ignore scum slips while i was reading the thread i was going to do a write up on CyberCheese however tnkted beat me to it this guy self admitted to jumping on bandwagons. he plays the IDC if i get lynched card this guy is scum.
##vote Cyber_Cheese


not sure if serious.. all that post shows is sevryn going "I was going to make a case against CC but tnkted did it already"
i did pretty much the same thing, am I related now too?


+ Show Spoiler +
On August 26 2011 03:52 Sevryn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 26 2011 02:31 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
On August 25 2011 23:41 Palmar wrote:
On August 25 2011 23:36 Forumite wrote:
On August 25 2011 23:15 Palmar wrote:
On August 25 2011 23:07 Forumite wrote:
On August 25 2011 23:01 Palmar wrote:
I have a new strategy, I'll never vote for people I think are town. I'll actually force a no-lynch over it. I'm just not going to spam the thread away trying to convince people I'm right.
Right...


What's your reasoning to believe Wiggles is town?

I don´t trust the primary argument made against him. Meta is usefull, sometimes, but I don´t think it´s applicable in finding a new kind of 3rd party with an unknown optimal play, especially as the meta argument focused specifically on his first post, which wanted to start a discussion more than anything. Since then wiggles has sometimes overreacted in his defences, there might be something there, but some players has said that Wiggles is hard to read, and I´m prepared to trust that Meta more than what Ferryman brought up.


Then take a look at some of the things that have happened in the game.

Wiggles decided to vote Eiii in his opening post. There is nothing wrong with randomly voting, but the fact that he felt the need to specify it was a pressure vote (through linking an awesome song by bowie/queen), shows inherent signs of guilt, and not wanting to stick his neck out. I don't even understand what the purpose of voting someone with the intent of only pressuring would be. At he point in time he threw down that vote it'd have been more sensical to go after one of the players that have posted, or to simply claim the vote on Eiii was to get rid of lurkers.


Basically, that vote was because he was lurking, and because when he actually got around to posting, I wanted him to say something substantial and not just a one-liner before disappearing. The vote draws attention to him, and makes it harder to lurk unnoticed. As well, I was somewhat making fun of the random voting that was happening before my post, as people were all trying to pressure each other, and I was throwing my own in there as well.

Now, he's starting to post more again, and should hopefully pick up his activity and actually discuss things in the last 24 hours before the lynch.

I want to talk about this post, though:
On August 25 2011 23:01 Palmar wrote:
Actually screw it.

I have a new strategy, I'll never vote for people I think are town. I'll actually force a no-lynch over it. I'm just not going to spam the thread away trying to convince people I'm right.

##Unvote tnkted
##Vote Mr. Wiggles
Trying to force a no-lynch is pretty anti-town, as it gives mafia a free round of night kills without any extra information for town. (If mafia's smart, they're not going to hit town mislynch targets).

I'm also interested in this post, because it comes 45 minutes or so before the deadline for the lynch, when tnkted was at 6 votes. This means that he was in danger of having an additional person vote for him, assuring his lynch. By unvoting him, you assure that it will take at least two people to make sure the lynch goes through, and so close to the deadline, it is much more likely that we will instead be forced to use one of our extensions, much better saved for further days.

So, it seems likely to me, that either you and tnkted are scumbuddies and you wanted to save him from the lynch, or that only you yourself are scum, making what looks like a bold town statement in order to assure that the extension is used on Day 1.

##Unvote
##Vote Palmar

Trying to save who you think is townie is not scum play as palmar proved in TL Mafia XLIV I will switch my vote to wiggles so we can get him lynched I still think ferryman made a very strong case against him. Cyber cheese needs to pick up his play.

##unvote
##vote Mr. Wiggles


Subtle disconnects.


a stunning argument

okay that actually makes sense


who would you like psych to visit?

same question @ eii

me that way I know he doesn't die first night and he knows I'm not the horror


I understand your reasoning, but I don't think it's in towns best interests to check you.
In my opinion: We should have the psych visit the people we suspect the most of being the EH checked as early as possible, to minimize the odds that the horror finds the psych first
It's also a good method of alleviating EH pressure from wrongfully accused townies, should that situation exsist.
As such, I think it currently makes the most sense for psych to visit MrWiggles, if we aren't going to lynch him.
If we lynch Wiggles and he turns out not to be the horror, I would check Ferryman overnight instead.
However, with that said, Sevryn is currently one of the people I'd like to have checked early in
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 26 2011 07:39 GMT
#324
On August 26 2011 16:36 Navillus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 26 2011 14:17 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
On August 26 2011 14:15 Navillus wrote:
Hmmm choosing who the psych checks actually does sound like a good idea, Wiggles, would you object to us agreeing for the psych to check you tonight?


I'd be fine with that. The only way it screws up is if EA visits him randomly, or if mafia shoot him. He should make up his own mind about who he wants to visit, though.


Ahhh this did not help you in my eyes, are you or are you not ok with it not, "I'm fine with it but he shouldn't" so for one I think mafia kills show up differently, actually

[green]will a suicide be announced as a suicide, different from a murder[green]

If suicides are announced differently then the only screw-up would be EH guessing right night1

There is a 1/11 chance of EH guessing correctly night1 which means if we do agree to check you and the psych dies the only way it wouldn't mean that you're EH is that 1/11 chance, and honestly I would auto-vote you on 10-1 odds, my question is would you accept this including getting lynched if the psych commits suicide, or are you really that worried about that 1/11 chance?


it wont matter, we'll see if hes sane or not
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 26 2011 10:13 GMT
#331
On the candidate pool:

Wiggles first-
We should lynch someone believed to me mafia overnight, while the psych should visit MrWiggles tonight and if he rocks up insane(+dead by logical extension), we know Ferrymans arguments have a solid base
While lynching the Eldritch is a great move for town, a day 1 that's extended via Eldritch lynch isn't as useful as say extending day 3/4
At this point, it's a bad idea to introduce people that don't already have votes

Myself-
I'm not going to vote myself

Which leaves Palmar and Tnkted-
I'm not an expert on this, was it easier or harder than usual to get votes for tnkted?
If it's been harder oneself could assume the mafias supporting him, but if it's been easier than it should then I feel i should move my vote
because I've been thinking about this quote of Palmars

On August 24 2011 00:29 Palmar wrote:
I have discarded my win condition, my sole object this game will be to convince Jackal I'm town, seeing as it's a feat I've never achieved.


I'm suspecting Tnkted was onto something, and we've let it slide
I'm not sure exactly how strong the back story is, but it seems the kind of joke that would be best if they were both mafia, and/or at the least Palmar was
The question is why was he thinking of convincing people that he was town from the get-go, and combined with the whole disregarding the win condition seeming to separate the two unnecessarily if he were to be a town role
Also of note is the choice of derp as an initial reply, it would seem the most logical choice if he were to be admitting to a mistake

Note that this differs from Navillus on two areas

On August 24 2011 00:20 Navillus wrote:
Dammit I need to role something more interesting than townie one of these days... anyway, I've never played a mini before so I'm very open to any mini-specific advice anyone has.


1) No matter what Navillus role is, it's something that someone might think to say
2) When called out on it, he didn't react defensively, and chose to vote back on the person who voted him, indicating a lack of concern that he had aroused suspicion

That alone, sure it's fine, but combined with the changing vote /extension use thing
There were a lot of people defending Palmar, certainly more than Tnkted
It all leads me to this

##Unvote

##Vote Palmar
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 26 2011 10:38 GMT
#336
On August 26 2011 19:21 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 26 2011 19:13 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On the candidate pool:

Wiggles first-
We should lynch someone believed to me mafia overnight, while the psych should visit MrWiggles tonight and if he rocks up insane(+dead by logical extension), we know Ferrymans arguments have a solid base
While lynching the Eldritch is a great move for town, a day 1 that's extended via Eldritch lynch isn't as useful as say extending day 3/4
At this point, it's a bad idea to introduce people that don't already have votes


You're clearly not reading the thread. None of the people pushing Wiggles think he's EA over any other kind of anti-town entity. I have no idea if he's the EA, and neither does Ferryman.

The reason people are defending me is because it's sensible to defend me. You're new to this game so I'm leaning that the reason you ignore facts, don't read the thread and approach the game from the point you're doing, is because you're unintentionally bad, instead of Mr. Wiggles's accusation of me which is almost certainly maliciously bad.

The fact that Wiggles has tried to swing a vote on me in a game where I am in my opinion radiating townie sunshine all over, is especially incriminating, because it's bad play, and wiggles isn't a bad player. By elimination the only remaining option is Wiggles being maliciously bad, which is almost certainly the case.

I still need to form an opinion on you, but I was leaning town. Now that you have proved to me you aren't reading the thread, I need another look.


I intentionally disregard the 'trap' for three reasons:
1) If it was a trap, wouldn't it be well thought out? Why wouldn't this 'trap' have been sprung BEFORE the extension? Surely if it were designed to be a trap from the get-go there was plenty of time in which the 'trap' could have been sprung with time to spare to secure votes
2) It seems more like a compromise.
"Well guys you obviously don't all agree the horror so I'll just call him mafia and you guys vote on him now?"
I'm not really sure of a better way to word this, it's just an impression I got
3) Only Palmar and Jackal have expressed any positive interest in the trap, for a grand total of three, and there are three mafia. This one I admit isn't a fair argument to use against it, but the first point basically convinces me on it's own
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 26 2011 18:07 GMT
#371
Town talks at night? There's a strange detour from classic mafia rules that surprised me
I'm going to apologise for not changing my vote, I fell asleep a few hours before the deadline.

##Visit MrWigges

He was under the heaviest suspicion of being EA, and his response to being checked started out well but finished with an attempt at undermining the value of having some clue where the psych goes
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 27 2011 01:36 GMT
#383
On August 27 2011 09:51 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
I'm fine with being checked, but what indication do we have that the psychologist actually visits me? I don't want him to not listen, show up dead, and then I get lynched.

If we have everyone vote, he should just vote for who he's visiting.

##Visit: Wiggles

If I turn out to be psychologist

##Visit: JeeJee


Hmm, making the chosen one chose alternate target for the case where the chosen one is psych... We should incorporate this alongside the voting, since it stops the psych from just sitting at home and wasting a night
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 27 2011 03:45 GMT
#386
On August 27 2011 12:27 chaos13 wrote:
I think the psychologist should do whatever they feel like. Too often the town majority ends up failing hard. Blue roles are distributed to individuals for this very reason.


I'm not sure that's a correct assessment
Some roles might be incapable of it, but a role that dies the night it finds it's target?
Outside of that we only really need the psych to heal the doc if he goes insane, and there's no way the mafia would let the doc live once he's revealed.
Sure the psych helps in the fight against the EA, but he does it more effectively if we know where he's been
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 27 2011 21:34 GMT
#423
I'm not entirely convinced on JeeJee.for two reasons
1) he could be trolling as town, out of boredom or something
2) if he's been using it as code, who were the recipients? surely theres some more examples, maybe even people replying?
point 1) is weakened by his reply after it was spotted

At this point, I think wiggles is clean:
If I were the mafia, I'd choose someone intelligent, active, and that was trying to get an innocent lynched
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 27 2011 22:21 GMT
#430
I went back through and tried to look for other examples from JeeJee, they don't exsist.
That umad just looks so forced though...
##Vote JeeJee
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 27 2011 22:23 GMT
#431
On August 28 2011 06:54 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 28 2011 06:34 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I'm not entirely convinced on JeeJee.for two reasons
1) he could be trolling as town, out of boredom or something
2) if he's been using it as code, who were the recipients? surely theres some more examples, maybe even people replying?
point 1) is weakened by his reply after it was spotted

At this point, I think wiggles is clean:
If I were the mafia, I'd choose someone intelligent, active, and that was trying to get an innocent lynched

Are you suggesting there is a traitor role in this game? If there is it's not in the OP. Do you know something we don't?
Is that why you killed Palmar?


Jee Jee if it wasn't for the U Mad at the end I'd briefly consider coincidence.


No, I don't know anything special, I overlooked the fact that mafia could PM each other overrides the no PM's rule by mistake.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 27 2011 22:45 GMT
#434
On August 28 2011 07:30 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 28 2011 07:21 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I went back through and tried to look for other examples from JeeJee, they don't exsist.
That umad just looks so forced though...
##Vote JeeJee


[image loading]


I suppose I should extend on that, while looking through, I was reminded that you were pushing to have me killed for a while
I was willing to go with a somewhat stretched benefit of doubt before that
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 28 2011 03:21 GMT
#446
On August 28 2011 10:17 JeeJee wrote:
i'll put my closing thoughts after day wraps up, before i'm officially dead. i already have it written up, hence the defeatist tone. there's nothing more for me to say, plus it's 10/12 already . wanna make this a 24hr day so this pain stops quicker? :X

Good question...
Are we able to turn the other half of the day into an extension and make up for the one we burned if 12/12 vote him?
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 28 2011 11:17 GMT
#454
Well this is a really slow day, I'm sure we could be doing something productive instead of just being content with lynching JeeJee.

Lets get some discussion going:
At this point in time, who do you think is town, and why?

I mentioned earlier that
On August 28 2011 06:34 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
At this point, I think wiggles is clean:
If I were the mafia, I'd choose someone intelligent, active, and that was trying to get an innocent lynched


Palmar was the perfect example of this, and that's a part of why I think wiggles is town.

Ferryman and Tnkted both pushed hard for a target to be lynched on day 1, Wiggles and Palmar respectively, harder than I believe a scum would on day 1, so I think they are town.

People I want to hear more of:
Sevryn, Eiii, Chaos
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 28 2011 22:04 GMT
#486
On August 28 2011 21:00 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 28 2011 12:21 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On August 28 2011 10:17 JeeJee wrote:
i'll put my closing thoughts after day wraps up, before i'm officially dead. i already have it written up, hence the defeatist tone. there's nothing more for me to say, plus it's 10/12 already . wanna make this a 24hr day so this pain stops quicker? :X

Good question...
Are we able to turn the other half of the day into an extension and make up for the one we burned if 12/12 vote him?

Only scum want a short day. Y U scum Cyber?

Negative, I figured we could get an extension refund
On August 28 2011 22:04 chaos13 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 28 2011 20:17 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Well this is a really slow day, I'm sure we could be doing something productive instead of just being content with lynching JeeJee.

Lets get some discussion going:
At this point in time, who do you think is town, and why?

I mentioned earlier that
On August 28 2011 06:34 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
At this point, I think wiggles is clean:
If I were the mafia, I'd choose someone intelligent, active, and that was trying to get an innocent lynched


Palmar was the perfect example of this, and that's a part of why I think wiggles is town.

Ferryman and Tnkted both pushed hard for a target to be lynched on day 1, Wiggles and Palmar respectively, harder than I believe a scum would on day 1, so I think they are town.

People I want to hear more of:
Sevryn, Eiii, Chaos


You want us all to give you our town reads? What does that accomplish? It just gives scum better targets, because if 7 people think player A is town, and player A isn't on the mafia team, then who do you think they're gonna hit? Probably player A, and then we're short a trustworthy townie.

I'll work on looking at JeeJee's posts and seeing if I can find similarities/connections to other players right now. Post what I find in a bit.


It was an attempt to create discussion, albeit apparently a bad one

On August 29 2011 02:54 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
Finding EA on day 1 is sub-optimal. It's a lot better to try to find him from now on, but only if we are very certain of his flip, and have a good target for a mafia lynch as well. I'm pretty sure I said something about this on Day 1, that finding the EA on the first day is the least optimal day to lynch him on, as we have the least information available, and thus can make the least use of the extra lynch.

Why so scummy, JeeJee? Hiding behind "eliminating a town threat" rhetoric, when it was the worst time to kill the horror and the day we would be most likely to mislynch anyways.

Also, to keep track:

#Of insane people 0-1/12


note that the EA is counted as insane, so its 1-2
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 29 2011 00:06 GMT
#509
It makes sense to me that since the psych is only able to become insane at night, that they would suicide by morning.

I'd like to throw suspicion of forumite for actually believing the psych claim:

On August 29 2011 08:05 Forumite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 29 2011 07:58 JeeJee wrote:
On August 29 2011 07:56 Forumite wrote:
On August 29 2011 07:52 JeeJee wrote:
You know what you guys remind me of? Hyenas eager for blood. This gives me an idea..

You haven´t given us much, if any, reason to doubt this lynch. You are acting like the textbook example of a Scum that got found out. Of course we are eager to get it over with.


but i'm a psychologist

You don´t think it would have been a good idea to tell us earlier!? Seriously! You are just hurting Town when you act like this. We are not going to lynch a blue who is most likely getting killed directly after claiming anyway, but you don´t give us much time to find another target.

Okay, who did you check during the first night?

##Unvote
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 30 2011 01:33 GMT
#552
I'm thinking we should

##Visit Chaos13

because of these two posts

On August 30 2011 07:10 chaos13 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 30 2011 02:39 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
Psychologist visit Jackal.

If Jackal is the Psychologist, visit Chaos13.


I would suggest the Psychologist don't visit Jackal, precisely because he is the EA. I'm going to vote Jackal tomorrow and be pushing for his lynch, so what is the point in causing our psych to kill himself by visiting Jackal?


That's the whole point, it's like extra details we can help turn into a case against him


On August 29 2011 22:09 chaos13 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 29 2011 21:33 Jackal58 wrote:
On August 29 2011 20:40 chaos13 wrote:
On August 29 2011 13:06 tnkted wrote:
I don't think it makes sense for jackal to bus his teamate this early... Unless you're suggesting he's EA, which I suppose is possible. I think jeejee > sevryn is our best bet right now.


Yes, Jackal is EA. I'm sure of it.

Really? And what brings you to that conclusion? My belief that scum are more dangerous to us than the EA at this stage of the game? I suggest you look at the two people with the least amount of posts in this game. One of them is the EA.


No, it's that you spent 3 hours looking for breadcrumbs. I know you've given an explanation already, but I'm not buying it. I can see taking 3 hours looking back through the thread and trying to analyze while you wait for him to call, but why were you looking for breadcrumbs? Let's go through each role and see what motivation they would have for that.

Townie - No logical reason. Maybe they're looking for psych/doctor, but what will they do with that information? They have no way to figure out if it is a lie or not, since anyone can breadcrumb anything when the role PM's are in the OP.

Doctor - Looking for psych so they can protect them. Unfortunately, this possibility is ruled out since Palmar already flipped doc.

Psychologist - Same as Townie. EA sure as hell isn't going to breadcrumb their role, and players don't know if they're sane or not so they can't crumb whether or not they've been visited. No point in it.

Mafia - Looking for doc or (maybe) psychologist to take them out early on.

EA - After there had been a plan or two pushed for that included the psychologist breadcrumbing their role, this makes perfect sense. Maybe the psych is an inexperienced player who did it before understanding how the plan was detrimental, or maybe they're an experienced player who did the same. EA wants to remove the only barrier to their win condition as soon as possible. Visit the psych, and you've reduced the number of sane players by 1 and also prevented future obstacles. The psych is the only one likely to have breadcrumbed (except mafia :p ) and now that the doc is dead the EA is the only one likely to be looking for it.


So the only two roles that it actually seems reasonable to spend so much time searching for crumbs are anti-town. Even in games as mafia when I was searching for crumbs to find blue roles I never spent that much time, and in this setup there are no hugely anti-mafia power roles.
As far as mafia is concerned, the psych helps them if they are visited by EA. This is the only logical conclusion. Jackal found JeeJee's post, and figured he could gain some town cred by pointing it out.


Why can't any role go through and try to figure out who's who?
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 30 2011 01:36 GMT
#553
The doc is dead, so the only person that sanity negatively affects is the psych, and even before that the doc would have to reveal to get made sane, so this whole game it's better for psych to look for EA, even more so than when we did it last night.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 30 2011 16:38 GMT
#564
On August 30 2011 10:33 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I'm thinking we should

##Visit Chaos13

because of these two posts

Show nested quote +
On August 30 2011 07:10 chaos13 wrote:
On August 30 2011 02:39 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
Psychologist visit Jackal.

If Jackal is the Psychologist, visit Chaos13.


I would suggest the Psychologist don't visit Jackal, precisely because he is the EA. I'm going to vote Jackal tomorrow and be pushing for his lynch, so what is the point in causing our psych to kill himself by visiting Jackal?


That's the whole point, it's like extra details we can help turn into a case against him


Show nested quote +
On August 29 2011 22:09 chaos13 wrote:
On August 29 2011 21:33 Jackal58 wrote:
On August 29 2011 20:40 chaos13 wrote:
On August 29 2011 13:06 tnkted wrote:
I don't think it makes sense for jackal to bus his teamate this early... Unless you're suggesting he's EA, which I suppose is possible. I think jeejee > sevryn is our best bet right now.


Yes, Jackal is EA. I'm sure of it.

Really? And what brings you to that conclusion? My belief that scum are more dangerous to us than the EA at this stage of the game? I suggest you look at the two people with the least amount of posts in this game. One of them is the EA.


No, it's that you spent 3 hours looking for breadcrumbs. I know you've given an explanation already, but I'm not buying it. I can see taking 3 hours looking back through the thread and trying to analyze while you wait for him to call, but why were you looking for breadcrumbs? Let's go through each role and see what motivation they would have for that.

Townie - No logical reason. Maybe they're looking for psych/doctor, but what will they do with that information? They have no way to figure out if it is a lie or not, since anyone can breadcrumb anything when the role PM's are in the OP.

Doctor - Looking for psych so they can protect them. Unfortunately, this possibility is ruled out since Palmar already flipped doc.

Psychologist - Same as Townie. EA sure as hell isn't going to breadcrumb their role, and players don't know if they're sane or not so they can't crumb whether or not they've been visited. No point in it.

Mafia - Looking for doc or (maybe) psychologist to take them out early on.

EA - After there had been a plan or two pushed for that included the psychologist breadcrumbing their role, this makes perfect sense. Maybe the psych is an inexperienced player who did it before understanding how the plan was detrimental, or maybe they're an experienced player who did the same. EA wants to remove the only barrier to their win condition as soon as possible. Visit the psych, and you've reduced the number of sane players by 1 and also prevented future obstacles. The psych is the only one likely to have breadcrumbed (except mafia :p ) and now that the doc is dead the EA is the only one likely to be looking for it.


So the only two roles that it actually seems reasonable to spend so much time searching for crumbs are anti-town. Even in games as mafia when I was searching for crumbs to find blue roles I never spent that much time, and in this setup there are no hugely anti-mafia power roles.
As far as mafia is concerned, the psych helps them if they are visited by EA. This is the only logical conclusion. Jackal found JeeJee's post, and figured he could gain some town cred by pointing it out.


Why can't any role go through and try to figure out who's who?


##Vote Chaos13
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
August 30 2011 18:30 GMT
#569
On August 31 2011 03:25 chaos13 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2011 01:38 Cyber_Cheese wrote:

##Vote Chaos13


You're doing an excellent job of voting for me with no explanation and completely ignoring my request to pressure me if you think I'm suspicious. If you want to vote for me, don't leave the information where it's at. Ask me questions and see if my responses are still scummy. Point out the mafia/EA objectives I have been pushing this game. If at the end of the day I'm still your #1 suspect, so be it. Don't do a one-liner vote.


Take a second look at who I quoted
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 01 2011 12:04 GMT
#639
My Internet has been down due to maintenance, so I apologise for the crummy explanation on the vote on chaos, It was a place holder just in case I didn't get a chance to vote later more than anything.
I haven't got much time to properly analyse the game at the moment because I'm using a mobile device at a mates at the moment, so I'll move my vote to where it seems most wanted so we don't burn another extension.

##Unvote

##Vote MrWiggles
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 01 2011 16:27 GMT
#650
good news, i'm back

Wow i had wiggles pegged as the psych because of that plan at the start... Which is why i didnt vote him sooner and accused ferryman of ea

On September 02 2011 01:12 Forumite wrote:
Tnkted, in this case it appears that you are part of a voting pattern. Normally there shouldn´t be any, at least not one that is easy to find, but I found something that looked like a pattern, and it lead us to one scum. It also leads to you, which makes me think you are scum too.

The FoS from JeeJee was his way of distancing himself from you two immediately after getting under fire for his breadcrumb. He mentioned you two by names, you were the first two to jump on it, maybe because of just this reason, so you would get some towncred for agreeing with a scum-lynch.


If distancing yourself on trial from other scum is scum 101, distancing yourself from an innocent is scum 102
Not saying its likely, just saying the distancing might be fake
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 01 2011 19:05 GMT
#657
On September 02 2011 03:47 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 00:23 Forumite wrote:
Mr. Wiggles - visit?
Cyber_Cheese
Sevryn
TheFerryman
chaos13 - visit?
Palmar
Navillus
Eiii
JeeJee - visit?
Jackal58 - visit?
Forumite
Erandorr
tnkted

Odd, of the players that the Psych was asked to visit, it´s only Jackal and Chaos13 that still live, and Night 2 voting were confused enough that we can´t know who of those two that actually got the visit. Wiggles and JeeJee turned out to be scum and got lynched, so the visit on Wiggles was wasted.

With the switch in player, Erandorr will be even harder to read. I want the Psych to visit him tonight.

##Visit Erandorr

Erandorr is being replaced for not voting. He's not being modkilled, he's being replaced. I think that says something about what Erandorr is.


I'm reading the OP, and it says mod killed people within a time frame will be replaced, but never specifies a time frame specifically if I'm not mistaken. I don't think we can actually act on this with any definite measure.
I do however think we should lynch whoever takes over Erandorr, because it will be very hard to get an accurate read on a new person in Erandorr's shoes.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 02 2011 02:26 GMT
#669
EA needs every living person to be insane, if the psych visits EA there is still 7 people alive assuming worst case scenario and a maximum of 6 will be insane, but if you use one of those values you have to subtract1 from the other because it assumes who the mafia visit

##Visit Kurumi

If Kurumi's psych, then

##Visit Eiii
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 02 2011 03:29 GMT
#671
On September 02 2011 11:34 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 11:26 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
EA needs every living person to be insane, if the psych visits EA there is still 7 people alive assuming worst case scenario and a maximum of 6 will be insane, but if you use one of those values you have to subtract1 from the other because it assumes who the mafia visit

##Visit Kurumi

If Kurumi's psych, then

##Visit Eiii

Psssttt. It's night time.


I know, we've been doing visit votes for the psychs at night time.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 02 2011 12:22 GMT
#673
On September 02 2011 18:20 Eiii wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 08:04 Jackal58 wrote:
4 People have died and all 4 have been sane. That makes me think the EA has been inactive


I don't understand this logic. It's pointless to assume that, because all the deaths so far have been sane, that the EA hasn't been sending in night actions. So trying to use that justification to show that the EA is a lurker when you could just point out that EA's best chance at winning is to fly under the radar for as long as possible seems just as pointless.


It's almost like he's trying to downplay the EA's threat level
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 02 2011 14:51 GMT
#676
Well that wasn't entirely unexpected
Someone insane had to die some time
Chaos seems like an odd choice
I checked the Chaos filter, I'm leaning towards the idea that tnkted killed him, either him or Jackal, based solely off accusations Chaos made before he died.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 03 2011 05:05 GMT
#682
On September 03 2011 12:02 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 03 2011 10:12 Forumite wrote:
The thread has slowed down.

With 8 players left, we need 5 votes to get a lynch. We were slow with getting the voting going yesterday, so going right ahead now.

##Vote tnkted

Tnkted is most likely the remaining scum. I think our vote today should go on the most likely EA candidate don't you?


Won't the day be extended either way?

##Vote Tnkted
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 04 2011 14:32 GMT
#699
Well it makes sense he was sane, which is a shame because the EA's closer to winning.

for the psych vote tonight I'm thinking

##Visit Sevryn

Or whoever his replacement is anyway.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 05 2011 02:18 GMT
#708
On September 05 2011 07:39 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2011 01:30 Forumite wrote:
Visiting Sevryn/wherebugsgo sounds good, without a good read, perhaps we can at least eliminate him as a possible EA.


Keeping the psych alive by having him visit people he's already visited and knows are not the EA keeps him alive and keeps you from winning.


It has a chance of keeping him alive sure, there is no guarantee.
If we find and lynch the EA, insane people aren't a problem.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 05 2011 16:18 GMT
#712
Hmmm that's interesting, wherebugsgo accused jackal and died that night
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 05 2011 16:28 GMT
#713
I suppose I should clarify

On September 04 2011 23:53 wherebugsgo wrote:
LOL.

Jackal not dead yet = definitely not a townie.

Also upon reading the first several pages Cyber is either really stupid or really scum/third party.


On September 06 2011 01:18 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Hmmm that's interesting, wherebugsgo accused jackal and died that night


Note that I said interesting, it's not necessarily incriminating because it's much more likely he died for threatening to publish reads.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-05 19:12:43
September 05 2011 16:48 GMT
#714
Alright I'm going to go with voting Kurumi, just check out the filter on Erandorr, in particular I note these:

On August 27 2011 08:05 Erandorr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 27 2011 07:27 tnkted wrote:
Hi, busy lately with bullshit, ill catch up soon. ##visit Mr. Wiggles, Sorry i couldn't be here to switch my vote

Thanks for not lynching me though, i appreciate it.


palmar that town read of yours... how strong is it?


Asking the person defending Tnkted, who dies that night

On August 29 2011 07:30 Erandorr wrote:
oh ##vote jeejee, completely forgot that part. looks like we might get a majority for him after all!


He was among the last to vote on this one

The final thing I would like to bring to note is his constant promises to post a write-up but never actually doing it.

As for his replacement:

On September 02 2011 05:36 Kurumi wrote:
Hello I am Kurumi and I am replacing a scummy lurker, I will answer all questions You might have tomorrow after I read the thread.


Note that for someone replacing a scummy lurker, Kurumi hasn't contributed much to convince us otherwise, but he was fourth (5 req) on the Tnkted bandwagon with:

On September 03 2011 20:27 Kurumi wrote:
Oh also, I've read the most important parts of the thread so I know tnkted is scum.
##vote: tnkted


##Vote Kurumi

On September 06 2011 02:58 Forumite wrote:
Nightkills is not a reliable way of finding scum, it´s mostly WIFOM.

Kurumi, could you tell us what you think about the game so far, and where you think the Scum and EA hide?


Yeah your right, I actually think Kurumi's the EA though and forgot to change up that first Erandorr bit, that point should have been more along the lines of trying to fit in as a townie.
If he were mafia, I doubt he would have tried to bus Wiggles quite that hard.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 05 2011 19:17 GMT
#717
Oh my god I edited my post ...
Everything under the vote was new, the rest is unchanged
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 07 2011 06:11 GMT
#736
On September 07 2011 07:55 Forumite wrote:
With 6 players left, we need 4 votes to lynch today. Tomorrow, it´s 5 players, and we will still need 4 votes to lynch. We need to be, if not sure, then at least united, if we want to lynch. I had a town-read on Navillus for a long time, but I´ve been wrong before in this game. Navillus doesn´t want to lynch lurkers, but Erandorr is/was a lurker, and an unknown read because of it. Voteanalysis doesn´t help here much either.

Eiii, what do you think? Cyber, what´s your read on Navillus?


I have Navillus pegged as a townie too, I really don't think he's EA at the moment.
I think Jackal is probably a townie, and out of the remaining three Forumite you are the most likely townie.
Eiii has been lurking much more hardcore than I'd like, and Erandorr/Kurumi isn't much better

I see more potential for Eiii to get lynched today, so I'm changing my vote off Kurumi for now.

On August 28 2011 08:28 Eiii wrote:
I don't like lynching jeejee for a supposed 'hey guys i'm scum lol' breadcrumb in one of his posts.

I DO like lynching him because he kept his vote on CC and was one of the few who forced a nolynch yesterday.

so let's do this ##vote JeeJee


Note that this was the fifth vote, he didn't vote wiggles the day before

All his votes follow this bandwagoning, and his filter is a single page with most of them more or less equating to fluff.

##Unvote

##Vote Eiii
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 07 2011 12:20 GMT
#739
On September 06 2011 22:42 Kurumi wrote:
Navillus wants to lynch active people and leave lurkers alone.
This isn't town agenda, You know that?
I know my alignment, I belive Jackal about his alignment, Forumite seems town.
Navillus was rarely active, his reasons are not townish (aka fake/bad/seem like policy lynches) and Eiii just "ignored" the game. I think scum will rather go full lurk mode in present situation and wait for things, while 3rd party will try to do everything to call suspicion somewhere else / distract town from themselves and give them more time for their objective.


Notice how the second half of his post describes the first half? Add to that he hasn't voted yet and it's awfully suspicious.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 07 2011 16:32 GMT
#743
Errr wait this is kinda bugging me

didn't someone get saved from a no vote by the first extension?
and don't we have a second extension?


http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=257133&currentpage=14#280
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 07 2011 16:35 GMT
#744
i suppose i need this too as proof there was meant to be two
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=257133&currentpage=10#183
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 07 2011 16:59 GMT
#747
On September 08 2011 01:42 Forumite wrote:
GM removed the rule about extensions quite recently. Blue post, I saw it.


Oh sorry, my mistake I forgot about that,
just for the record, it was
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=257133&currentpage=35#694
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
September 07 2011 19:19 GMT
#769
I'm kinda glad I wasn't trusting Jackal in all that.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 12m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
-ZergGirl 42
StarCraft: Brood War
ggaemo 851
Leta 222
Bale 22
Icarus 4
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1071
XaKoH 875
League of Legends
JimRising 805
febbydoto16
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K573
semphis_26
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor139
Other Games
summit1g10767
shahzam1787
WinterStarcraft405
ViBE248
Maynarde132
NeuroSwarm64
JuggernautJason29
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1036
BasetradeTV32
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH208
• davetesta47
• practicex 43
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 119
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1528
• Lourlo1088
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
6h 12m
OSC
19h 12m
Stormgate Nexus
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
LiuLi Cup
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
HCC Europe
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.