EPT[T][M]Experimental Haunted Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
As to my intentions, I'm a perfect gentleman, I assure you | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
YDDE Q ______ (note 6 missing letters) -> "Inno a" -> "Inno a Satana" | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Heh, that would be somewhat appropriate | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Might be too far fetched if the answer is "logical" because there's no one clear answer based on that | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 06 2011 04:21 DoctorHelvetica wrote: there is a severe misunderstanding of the puzzle so i will intervene this once. there is more than one number input in the combination. Well that was the initial assumption, but the problem to me is that there are so many possibilities, it's hard to rule anything out and you only get one chance. Of course, we just could be missing something incredibly obvious. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 06 2011 05:55 Varpulis wrote: and out of curiosity what was the thought process that led to the solution, for those of us who didn't dismiss it as too simple an answer. L E V I A T H A N 12-5-22-9-1-20-8-1-14 | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
I don't know DrH at all, but this line of thinking rules out at least Varpulis/Trotske/Curu/Me and probably a few others. These players also aren't likely night 0 cult recruiting targets. I'll further narrow it down to meapak/kita/bumat/coag/amber/palmar/mig. I'm eliminating mig/palmar from consideration rather arbitrarily for now. Coag seems to be playing his recent style of "not actually playing the game", so voting him would be tempting. Amber hasn't been doing anything either. Bumat has been only marginally more active while meapak and kita have been putting more effort into this. I think a cult recruit would be putting more effort into this, so I'll be deciding between those two, or possibly amber, tomorrow. These are quite weak reasons for lynching someone, but I've to work with what I have. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 06 2011 08:09 kitaman27 wrote: Why is everyone so certain that someone has been recruited into a cult? I don't know about you guys, but I was unable to perform any night actions on night zero, so I assume it is the same for others. Accusing people of being cult recruits at this point is only placing unnecessary doubt on pro-town players. syllogism, your thought process behind your vote is rather odd. Not only is it unlikely that anyone is a cult recruit, you are also punishing activity and promoting a poor thread environment. Yes, it's unfortunate but if I go on the path of lynching useless lurkers, I will still be stuck lynching lurkers by day 4. I will of course reconsider based on thread activity. I'm also not completely against lynching someone based on being worthless, but I'm inclined to believe that in the likely setup the scum will not be found there. There are flavor and more substantial reasons for believing the game did not begin as a standard 9/3 setup. Whether there is a recruiter or if DrH is making the decisions is another story. Nothing about the setup is obviously guaranteed, but you would have to provide me reasons for me to believe that it's a normal setup. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
##vote Coagulation | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
"his pregame cult thing kinda got me nervous. It's a good cover up to hang backon later in the game. What does that even mean? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:49 bumatlarge wrote: THERE IS NO CULT THAT WE KNOW OF No one should be voting someone based on the likely hood of them being recruited. We would want to find the recruiter anyway. Don't blind yourself dude. So what do you think the setup is? If there's 3 scum, no way we are lynching one tonight with this lack of focus and vote distribution | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:54 bumatlarge wrote: wtf? If mafia vote together then the win the game for us. If you think it's coag then explain why. Just because we dont have a a great shot at it doesnt mean we should go off on some other tangent and base our vote around something we dont know. Vote because people are scummy, not because you think someone else thinks they would be good scum. None of the people that are currently up for lynch have done anything all day and "coag never does anything" isn't exactly a convincing case for him being town | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 07 2011 08:32 Varpulis wrote: ok cool. item is tarot cards. basically an alignment checker. sorry i missed the lynch DrH, honestly thought it was later, if i'd known i'd miss it i'd have voted with my check in post made on my friends phone. rofl we killed high priest. I didn't intend you to disclose what the item does, just the name. If we've a medic, protect varpulis. While we currently don't have to eliminate the remaining scum to win, I'm guessing that if we fail at the puzzle solving win con we will have to. Protecting me isn't a bad idea either, considering I solved the first puzzle and it looks like scum can't win unless they prevent us from solving some of the puzzles. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
The Magician, The High Priestess, The Empress, The Emperor, The Hierophant, The Lovers, The Chariot, Strength, The Hermit, Wheel of Fortune, Justice, The Hanged Man, Death, Temperance, The Devil, The Tower, The Star, The Moon, The Sun, Judgement, The World, and The Fool. THE MAN BORN I Uh, The Fool? THE FALLEN KING OF BABYLON II The Devil? The Emperor? THE LIGHT III The Sun THE END IV Death or Judgement THE MORNING STAR V The Devil? Apparently it can also refer to Virgin Mary, in which case this could be The High Priestess THE STAGE VI The World | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 08 2011 00:52 Mig wrote: Kill Mig! You know if I had kept my vote on Coag he would have had 3 votes first and he would have died instead of Amber. I switched to Palmar because I thought he was more likely to be scum. You right, that does alleviate some of my concerns, though perhaps you thought I would switch with you. If Amber was a recruiter, who do you think he would have recruited on n0? I can't really make much sense of the voting patterns unless the other scum was someone who wasn't around for the lynch. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 08 2011 01:45 kitaman27 wrote: Cmon now. Think to yourself: What purpose would it serve me as scum to learn a single person who doesn't have an item. I already know several people who do have items, so if I was looking for a hit I would just kill one of them. If someone does come forward, they will likely be able to learn that my intentions were pro-town anyways. Palmar said his cabinet was empty, which probably means he has no item | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Is this flavor or part of the puzzle? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
http://i1082.photobucket.com/albums/j363/vampireinsect/findthecreatorsprofile.jpg It was a generic one previously (http://i.imgur.com/4QMzM.jpg) | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:43 bumatlarge wrote: Amber is getting lynched as of right now with three, but I think mafia is too scared to change their votes, unless trotske has balls of steel. I think amber dying will bring a lot to the table, especially with votes this tight. But I'd rather have one of the three I listed get lynched. So I'll vote curu as well, amber is a good player and can be useful. ##Unvote ##Vote Curu You didn't want to lynch Amber, votes were fairly evenly distributed and yet you thought Amber dying "will bring a lot to the table"? If he had flipped town, why exactly do you think that would be the case? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Based on voting, it's quite difficult to see which one is more likely scum. Both had at certain point a chance to save Amber, but Trotske cast the deciding vote with only 35 minutes left and at that point no single vote switch was enough to save him, unless the switch was away from Amber. Mig had just switched from Coag and earlier stated that he found Amber/Palmar/Coag suspicious, so he was pretty much stuck voting Palmar or Amber. Similarly, Bum had wanted to keep the lynch between redff/curu/mig, and indeed he switched to Curu as soon as someone else expressed interest. Bum put more effort into getting people to switch away from Amber, but not enough to look criminating by itself. I'm still assuming there were only two scum because otherwise the lynch makes little sense, unless the third one was basically afk the whole day. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 09 2011 01:54 redFF wrote: THE NUMBERS YOU NEED ARE IN THE BOOK. That would be more helpful if we knew what it relates to at all, how to use said numbers and what the book is. I suppose it's likely the book of reveleations, but nothing really stood out in it. Perhaps Curu is on the right track with 6:8 though. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
| ||
