EPTSomeone shoot him already.
Real Time Mafia - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
Someone shoot him already. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
What I don't understand is that GM suggested that we should kill you and now he's 100% supportive of your role, baiting mafia to roleblock him. Does not make sense, I just don't understand. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On June 30 2011 13:36 GMarshal wrote: So do I! ^_^ *still* haven't been shot. Vigi's really need to get on that. What lynch targets are we considering for today? I'll make a quick list based on the voting patterns alone, disclaimer should not be used as fact blahblah not a guarantee syllogism sinani206 DropBear Cthsazsa ~Opz~ Jackal58 Mig gtrsrs Palmar Varpulis GGQ Vain chaos13 aprudds Hyaach I'd expect most of the scum to lay in this list. Remember, this list is based solely off the voting patterns so a few of these can be stricken (like Palmar). Take your pick but you really shouldn't choose anyone outside of this list. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
WHAT ARE YOUR OPINIONS ON PALMAR'S CONSTANT VOTE SWITCHING? DO YOU THINK VISCERAEYES COULD BE SCUM AND TRYING SOME GOSU STRATEGY? i hope the caps created a sense of urgency for your caffeinated brain | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On June 30 2011 14:07 GMarshal wrote: I was going to reply to this, but you know what, I wont. Bolded part never happened, I also never suggested I was a Vigi. I did claim vet, and guess what, easy as hell to confirm. I never, ever asked for a dt check and *all* my behavior has been pro-town. That is all. And Drazek budding up to me should tell you something, but go on and let the mafia sway your opinions. ^_^ Anyway, I'm done defending myself, where is my bullet so I can get to scumhunting? I'm tired and I want to sleep. feel free to scumhunt, nobody is stopping you we just won't take your words seriously until we get confirmation in fact, it's BETTER to state all your opinion now if a vig hits you and you lose your extra life, what's going to stop scum from shooting you afterwards? therefore you should get everything you want off your chest and all your suspicions so we can read it if you die | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
 Also, this Vig sure is taking his time. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On June 30 2011 13:41 youngminii wrote: I'll make a quick list based on the voting patterns alone, disclaimer should not be used as fact blahblah not a guarantee syllogism I've already argued my case against him, he's so lolscum and I am voting for him sinani206 I dunno, I can see him being scum but as of right now I don't have anything to accuse him of DropBear I'm leaning towards scummy on this guy but syllogism is a much better lynch Cthsazsa Can't figure him out, either newbie or scummy which doesn't really help ~Opz~ Same as DropBear Jackal58 Pretty townie imo until I'm told otherwise Mig Holy is this guy flying under the radar or what? Guess I missed most of his posts considering he's not on the lurker list gtrsrs Pretty townie judging by his last few posts Palmar One of my main sources of entertainment this game, I'd be sad to see him go, probably townie although he may need a DT check in the near future Varpulis I'm leaning scum, I'm awaiting an analysis of him from someone else because I can't seem to pinpoint anything, will look again though GGQ Flying under the radar, made it on the lurker list, what can I say? No clue Vain I heard people having scum doubts on him, to me he's been under the radar, I will need to go back and check his posts chaos13 Same as Cthsazsa although a tad more scummy aprudds Unfortunate replacement so no idea, if a DT is going to use their 2 lurker check instead of their single check, I strongly suggest you check this guy (Mataza now) since he has less posts that we can suss out Hyaach Lurker list, not enough info, I'd shoot him if he spends another day on the list though I'd expect most of the scum to lay in this list. Remember, this list is based solely off the voting patterns so a few of these can be stricken (like Palmar). Take your pick but you really shouldn't choose anyone outside of this list. tl;dr kill syllogism | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
yes palmar we know we're waiting for a vig to hit him | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
Might be too late though. Kill syllo. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On June 30 2011 18:17 Palmar wrote: lol stop soft-claiming and just ask the hosts in pm. the funny part is 1. he's not soft claiming a specific role, just that he's blue 2. there's absolutely no reason/point to soft claim at this point in the game 3. he's pointing a target on his back for mafia unless he's a vet who's trying to take a hit which i highly doubt conclusion? he's scum Lynch syllogism 2011! | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
Still gunning for you lalalala syllogism is scum etc. etc. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
First: Misunderstanding the mechanics of a new game for a few posts is not scummy AT ALL. This was literally for like 10 minutes where I forgot Mafia had 3KP and I've been called out on it like 5 times already, give it a break. Second: When I say "I assume that was a scum hit", that's basically me saying "I'm sure that's a scum hit", it doesn't take a genius to figure that out. Third: I did think GM was a good DT target, and then TAA came in and corrected me by logically deducing that GM would very likely be GF if he was scum. I agreed but I didn't voice my agreement because I didn't want to spam up the thread, instead I simply stopped saying DTs should check GM. Fourth: When did I actually say I'll come out and do an analysis in the first place? Why are you expecting this of me? Fifth: Analysis =/= post by posts. Pointing out someone's actions and why they relate to scum = analysis, which I have done. Sixth: I had no opinion on Drazerk, so what? The evidence that was on the table was our DT had been tunneling Drazerk and without a better candidate he's obviously the logical lynch. Seventh: If you really think the 'analysis' on VisceraEyes was legitimate and should have been taken seriously, then you need to work on your scumhunting skills and I am clearly wasting my time trying to respond to you. Eighth: I never said GM was townie, in fact I still think he's pretty damn scummy. However he claimed Vet and if a Vig shoots him that's the best way to confirm him so why would I want to lynch him? Ninth: Why are you making it all about VisceraEyes vs Drazerk? Mafia isn't about getting two people and herding everyone into voting for one of them. You seem to think that because I thought VisceraEyes was townie, I should be inclined to vote for Drazerk. This sir, is a flaw in logic. Tenth: Why do you keep taking things out of context? When I said Drazerk would be a good lynch for information, I say that as an extra benefit. At that point I was trying to convince people on the VisceraEyes bandwagon to switch to Drazerk. The point I was trying to make was that on TOP of the evidence already against Drazerk (TAA's tunneling mostly) there was the added benefit of information. I appreciate you taking the time to try and get me lynched and I hope this response was fitting. Lynch syllogism 2011! | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
I'm currently co-hosting Closed Casket Mafia and I've been following the game very closely for entertainment purposes. That game only has 1KP and I accidentally brought that line of thinking when I was making the post where I slipped. Hope this can reassure some people as to why I made a silly (more like lolnoob) mistake. I still don't see how it's that scummy though. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
Context: Mig had been very aggressively trying to get VisceraEyes lynched. Then: + Show Spoiler + On June 30 2011 03:27 Mig wrote: I am back! I am voting drazerk. Just quick word on my reasons why. A) Not sure if the dt did actually check him but there is probably some % chance that he could have. B) Townies more often tend to let their actions speak for them where as mafia try and make a town play then point it out for everyone to see. Draz makes a martyr post then immediately links to a game where he did the same as townie. This just sets off immediate warning bells to me because he wasn't really just giving up like his post was saying but instead was trying to copy his play as town from a previous game and hope people would notice. This just strikes me as a very scum thing to do. Quick thoughts on a couple others Visceyes - Not nearly as aggressive as he normally is as town, makes a ton of non committal posts where he really contributes nothing. Also like I said earlier scum post when it is convenient for them not for the town. Anyone who promises analysis then fails to deliver should make everyone extremely suspicious. Would be an excellent vig shot. GM - GM may actually have real life issues he is dealing with but we can't really know. But he did promise the town analysis that he hasn't delivered on. He just stopped in made one post saying people shouldn't link him and draz together then disappeared. If he does come back soon and make a good analysis it probably isn't an issue but for now I am a bit wary. Less than 30 minutes later: + Show Spoiler + On June 30 2011 03:54 Mig wrote: Actually after re reading. I have changed my mind. I am more inclined to agree with chaos about VE. Visc hasn't just promised once saying he was going to make analysis but has done it repeatedly. He then provides absolutely nothing for the town, takes 0 stands on any players and when pressured he rushes out an analysis on draz (the person most analyzed by other players already). And really it just seems so opposite from Visc's normal town play. His opinions are often wrong but he has strong opinions and he has no fear expressing them and attacking other people. This game has been pretty much the polar opposite. The vote switch itself is quite scummy, but then again if Palmar does it every 5 minutes  If you can get past the fact that he made this scummy vote switch, then you'll see that his posts actually have a lot of consistency, something you won't find a lot of scum doing. Mig wanted VisceraEyes dead for a while because he wasn't playing according to his meta. He even states this in the first quote how VisceraEyes usually plays a very aggressive townie and this didn't fit. This actually makes perfect sense, considering how VisceraEyes claimed DT and I think Mig pointed this out himself. As a DT you're less likely to stick your head out which completely lines up with everything Mig had against VisceraEyes. My opinion? Town. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On June 30 2011 23:28 syllogism wrote: Though early on Youngminii made a weird comment about our "only DT" dying. If there's no roleblocker, would that indicate there's only one dt Ahh you've got a keen eye lol I actually wanted to edit that to change it but I'm not allowed to and I didn't want to spam up unnecessary posts. By only DT I meant the only confirmed DT.Anyway syllo I went through your recent posts and I'm pretty damn satisfied. I'll unvote you in a sec. On a related note, a while ago I was coming up with random theories and by the end of it I basically determined that you and chaos are opposite alignments. I'll go through my line of thinking soon (if I can retrace my train of thought) but I had come to the conclusion that one of you were scum and you seemed to be scummier so I pressed for you. It's also easier to gauge your reactions since I've actually seen you play before, I've never seen chaos play so yeah. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
I went through chaos13's posts and he's so god damn pro-town. Looks like my vote is staying on you buddy. | ||
| ||
