• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:13
CEST 07:13
KST 14:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025)1Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week0Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer10Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025) Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer Rain's Behind the Scenes Storytime How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Echoes of Revolution and Separation Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 33312 users

Surprisingly Normal Mini Mafia IV

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 15 2011 21:59 GMT
#15
/in
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 17 2011 19:40 GMT
#98
On June 18 2011 04:19 gtrsrs wrote:
d'aww i wish we could start now
you know one thing i never understand? how exactly do games get started? like where does the first FoS come from? i know last game it was because freeloader asked a rookie question and some mafia hopped on it. but other games i feel like there's nothing to go on. i'm hosting a full-role game on another forum right now and there are like 4 posts per day between 20 players because everyone just tries to win at night and no one wants to talk in order to not get suspicions on them. it's super frustrating to watch because it's boring as hell but i kinda see where they're coming from.

anyways
MAYBE I SHOULD SAY SOMETHING SUSPICIOUS TO GET US STARTED

I would have jumped on anything whether or not I was scum. Better than a boring game that's for sure.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 17 2011 22:37 GMT
#112
On June 18 2011 06:54 gtrsrs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2011 06:41 Treadmill wrote:
I was ignoring that possibility more because of the strangeness of a role-blocker with no roles to block. I suppose that GM could just be screwing with us though.


oh herp. you're right i didn't even consider that. yes it does make it seem less likely

on the other hand the mafia won't know the set-up either. with the 2 goons and 1 hooker they could think that there are power roles so it's a mindfuck to them too. i guess it matters less to them since they want all of us dead regardless if we bleed blue or green but yeah

anyways
we should keep the set-up possibilities fresh every couple of pages and update it or eliminate possibilities after every kill.

also it should go without saying but
if we have one, the medic should never claim unless he is going to be lynched or unless one of his confirmed saves is going to be lynched. he doesn't have to lay low (see GGQ's post at the end of mafia XL about how a blue should play) because he doesn't WANT to look like a medic, but he shouldn't broadcast his role unless it the town is lynching his clear. maybe the medic can claim in a LYLO situation but i'm hesitant to say the medic SHOULD claim in LYLO because the mafia will likely claim medic as well. play it by ear


This actually makes it town favored in some circumstances after night one, because town could have more access to info then mafia.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 17 2011 23:13 GMT
#118
You do realize scum can claim role block right?
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 17 2011 23:48 GMT
#127
On June 18 2011 08:43 Drazerk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2011 08:39 CjrNinja wrote:
How is this discussion pro town in any way?
Determining what setup we have will only help mafia fish for blue roles. if there are any, then mafia will act accordinly.

What if there are no rockblockers? And mafia claims roleblock? Then we're completely n the wrong mindset.

Town shouldn't be relying on any blue roles to win the game for them. We know that there are three mafia, our goal is to identity them, not whether or not there are blue roles in play.

Blues should be acting indepentently. So no, do not roleclaim please.

Someone explain how knowing tthe setup helps town? Cause it seems to me like it doesn't.

Sorry about the bad formatting, my phone sucks.


Working out the Game type helps blues but not the town while reds already have a 50/50 guess on the type and if they work out there is for example a medic in play they know the game type and can use it against us.


Blue's have a 50/50 guess as well on the game type. I really don't see what your getting at.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 18 2011 00:01 GMT
#129
Working out the Game type helps blues but not the town while reds already have a 50/50 guess on the type and if they work out there is for example a medic in play they know the game type and can use it against us.


Alright since you asked for it I'll start with you.

Let's break this post down shall we?

Statement 1: Finding this information helps blues.

Statement 2: Finding this information does not help town.

Statement 3: Red's have a 50/50 guess on the game.


Wow seriously man, step it up. Think things through. You should be able to see the conclusions people can come to when they look at these statements and connect the dots.

Especially when they combine it with this.

but I agree in that we should stop this discussion and get onto analysing people


aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 18 2011 00:31 GMT
#131
On June 18 2011 09:28 Drazerk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2011 09:01 aprudds wrote:
Working out the Game type helps blues but not the town while reds already have a 50/50 guess on the type and if they work out there is for example a medic in play they know the game type and can use it against us.


Alright since you asked for it I'll start with you.

Let's break this post down shall we?

Statement 1: Finding this information helps blues.

Statement 2: Finding this information does not help town.

Statement 3: Red's have a 50/50 guess on the game.


Wow seriously man, step it up. Think things through. You should be able to see the conclusions people can come to when they look at these statements and connect the dots.

Especially when they combine it with this.

but I agree in that we should stop this discussion and get onto analysing people




Can I pull a Freeloader here and Chalk it up to being a idiot / Inexperienced?

and statement two was more the fact of it may not help towns initially but helps Detectives be a bit more open without claiming knowing they have a medic as back up ( depending on set up ofc ) helping town later in the game.


Notice how I didn't accuse you? Play smarter. Think about what you want to say. Don't be a kurumi and barf out your random thoughts onto the page and hope it makes sense.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 18 2011 01:16 GMT
#133
On June 18 2011 10:05 freeloader625 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2011 09:31 aprudds wrote:
Notice how I didn't accuse you? Play smarter. Think about what you want to say. Don't be a kurumi and barf out your random thoughts onto the page and hope it makes sense.


Oh damn son he just called you a, "kurumi."

Show nested quote +
On June 18 2011 09:28 Drazerk wrote:

Can I pull a Freeloader here and Chalk it up to being a idiot / Inexperienced?



Wait, oh you didn't just go there!


Hey Freeloader you intend of contributing this round instead of making random comments all game long?
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 18 2011 01:51 GMT
#135
On June 18 2011 10:35 freeloader625 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2011 10:16 aprudds wrote:
Hey Freeloader you intend of contributing this round instead of making random comments all game long?


You sound angry. Was it because you failed to lynch me last game? :D

Seriously though, I'll contribute more this game. Pinky swear!


No anger here
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 18 2011 03:52 GMT
#137
On June 18 2011 11:48 gtrsrs wrote:
aprudds is out for blood
don't back down bro

i'm gonna go ahead and piggyback off that
freeloader you got your free pass last game you freeloader. you know well enough by now that posts like this \/
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2011 10:35 freeloader625 wrote:
On June 18 2011 10:16 aprudds wrote:
Hey Freeloader you intend of contributing this round instead of making random comments all game long?


You sound angry. Was it because you failed to lynch me last game? :D

Seriously though, I'll contribute more this game. Pinky swear!


accomplish nothing. so instead of posting this, why don't you make an analysis or contribute in some way


That's not fair gtr. What exactly is there analyze exactly? What has this contributed? Take some initiative as well and listen to your own advice. Unless your scum, then you can go burn and die.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 18 2011 21:30 GMT
#156
Hey Drazerk, inactives will get modkilled. I'm sure you learned that from last game. You also seem a bit too eager to change focus from freeloader.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 00:50 GMT
#161
The point Drazerk is that inactives will get modkilled. Trying to completely shift focus onto inactives who might not even respond is not productive or pro town.

##Vote: Drazerk

aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 02:25 GMT
#166
Gtrsrs that doesn't make ANY sense whatsoever.

Let me see break this down with less fluff

Lord Vatti might not even show up and get modkilled therefore we should waste our lynch on him?

Sorry, but what kind of scummy ass backwards ass logic is that?

Might I remind you that there are no vigilantes this game. Lynching is the only way for us to fight scum.

Let's see what we gain by doing a AFK lynch.

Oh wait, we gain nothing!

We will start day 2 with no information from a lynch, a modkill and a mafia kill.


the town votes for Lord Vatti. since he was queued up to be modkilled, we lose nothing, and get a free night of investigations, potential saves, both, or neither.


What the hell mate. Incase you didn't know scum kill at night as well.

What your suggesting is that we waste time, lose our lynch and wait on blue information.

Terrible terrible plan.

You vote for who you think is the most suspicious.

That being said, I looked through the few posts there are carefully and realized I have been a bit hasty with my vote.


##Unvote
##Vote Alderan


Oh no you don't Alderan. You don't get away with that.


A bit too eager to jump on the bandwagon are we?

Hoping Vatti comes and provides something useful.


Posting something Useful you say? What have you done again? Your going to vote for him because it's the most logical choice? What logic? I don't see any.


Keep in mind guys we're less than 24 hours in, I mean, I just woke up. Just like last game (I think almost all of us were in), a list of people who are posting very generic fluff and not helping the town is much more helpful than an inactive list.


Huh, quite the 180 there scum . Go burn and die.

aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 03:21 GMT
#169
On June 19 2011 11:44 gtrsrs wrote:
guys you need to look at this from a numbers standpoint
how fair would this game be if, when we lynched a townie, mafia got 2 kills? that would suck right?

well numerically, mislynching today would be the same. let's say Drazerk flips town. now mafia gets "2 kills" in Lord Vatti and someone else. at least Drazerk has the POTENTIAL to contribute at this point. LV's contributions are absolutely nothing.

i'm glad you brought up the vigilante point aprudds. don't we know too well that just because a vigilante CAN kill someone at night, doesn't mean he SHOULD? likewise, now that lynching is our only KP, just because we CAN lynch someone doesn't mean we HAVE to, especially with a modkill on the block.

and i know i look so scummy for this but i'm gonna stick with my guns here and ask you to vote for Lord Vatti til he shows up to give some input. this might just be the epicmafia vet in me speaking. but when we have someone who is actively lurking, we vote for them. most of the time once the votes pile up, they show up in the discussion. but if not, vote-kicking them is the best way to progress the game, as they would have "vegged out" and died anyways. as soon as LV shows up i'm happy to throw my vote on drazerk. but for the time being, i have *minimal* suspicion of drazerk. i'd rather make a harmless vote than vote for someone based on minimal suspicions. of course as soon as LV shows up, the *minimal* suspicion will be my greatest suspicion so i'll change then. but please don't let mafia jump up to a 3 kill advantage this early


Your supporting a no lynch day one. We gain no info out of that, go 2 men down because of the modkill and night kill and then REPEAT DAY ONE ALL OVER AGAIN.

So we have to take a risk, big deal. If we never took risks we would lose. Why are you fear mongering? What happened to the GTRSRS of last game who was tunneling with balls of steel. The only person that would benefit from a no lynch is scum.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 03:52 GMT
#171
On June 19 2011 12:49 gtrsrs wrote:
i will tunnel with balls of steel once i actually have something to go on Q_Q
for now i am just afraid of starting the game down 3 townies instead of 2


You realize you always have to take the risk of lynching and postponing it is only going to give the win to scum right? Who neutered you Gtr? Where is the prideful fearless motherfucker from last game?
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 04:14 GMT
#173
On June 19 2011 13:10 Treadmill wrote:
hrrm... I'd actually agree with gtrsrs' argument for once (somewhat). If we don't have a half-decent case against somebody by tomorrow I think that It WOULD be better to just lynch L.V. rather than do a semi-random lynch.

However
a. there's still time for LV to pop up and NOT get modkilled
b. there's still time for a semi-decent case against someone to be established.

I'm still leaving my vote on Drazerk until he posts something with substance (or a better case arrives).


You realize with this mindset we are just going to be waiting till the dawn of time. Your going to "wait" for a better case to come? What you think scum are just going to barge in and yell HERE I AM COME AND GET ME?
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 04:38 GMT
#175
On June 19 2011 13:23 Treadmill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 19 2011 13:14 aprudds wrote:
On June 19 2011 13:10 Treadmill wrote:
hrrm... I'd actually agree with gtrsrs' argument for once (somewhat). If we don't have a half-decent case against somebody by tomorrow I think that It WOULD be better to just lynch L.V. rather than do a semi-random lynch.

However
a. there's still time for LV to pop up and NOT get modkilled
b. there's still time for a semi-decent case against someone to be established.

I'm still leaving my vote on Drazerk until he posts something with substance (or a better case arrives).


You realize with this mindset we are just going to be waiting till the dawn of time. Your going to "wait" for a better case to come? What you think scum are just going to barge in and yell HERE I AM COME AND GET ME?

As opposed to your path which is "its day one and there's obviously enough evidence for me to be 100% certain xyz is scum"? Waiting to see what people say when they post more is prudent. And if they don't post anything then that tells us something too. Also, your case against Alderan? Shitty.


Oh so you will only lynch when your 100% certain someone is scum? I guess you will never lynch anyone then unless you get a DT role. How convenient.

Your relying on being passive and hoping people out themselves. Do you think scum is just going to jump out and say LYNCH ME PLZ ^_^ with everyone just sitting around and 'waiting'? No waiting is what scum want, to slowly pass the days along picking us off one by one.

I realize we don't want a mislynch but if we aren't active and surrender the first day to scum without even trying to fight back what does that leave us in day 2? Exactly where we started, waiting for more information.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 05:18 GMT
#178
On June 19 2011 14:01 Treadmill wrote:
Your logic is kinda crappy, Pyo. You're assuming that if we have, say, 3 suspects, that one (and exactly one) must be red. Which is obviously not the case. Also, don't metagame too much, its entirely possible that aprudds got mafia twice in a row.

@aprudds: sorry, I don't mean to be passive. Partly I'm just a little uncertain considering how absolutely wrong I was about everything last game. I actually agree with you that we should lynch whomever seems most suspicious, not go after L.V. for being inactive. But I think we have around 12 hours for people to post and possibly slip up. No, people won't shout "I am mafia" but they may contradict themselves or make spurious arguments.


You realize that "I'm uncertain how wrong I was" was the EXACT card I played last game to get people off me when I was scum
Don't get demotivated because of last game, this is a much smaller game, it will be much harder to lurk compared to the lurking scum did last game.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 15:08 GMT
#194
Drazerk, smarten up. Playing Jesus is not going to help ANYONE.

I would like to draw attention to the fact that Alderan STILL hasn't posted anything other than, "Imma jump on da bandwagon broz."

He starts posts after an inactive list is put up, says this


Keep in mind guys we're less than 24 hours in, I mean, I just woke up. Just like last game (I think almost all of us were in), a list of people who are posting very generic fluff and not helping the town is much more helpful than an inactive list.


condemning the inactive list, then HOURS later comes in with this


Hoping Vatti comes and provides something useful.


##Vote: Lord Vatti

Until I see a case against someone else it's the only logical place for a vote.


He reeks of scum. Within 2 posts he contradicts himself a does a 180 on his position and then slides into the darkness. He's trying to pull exactly what Lafali pulled last game.


About the case with the voting patterns, they are bound to change since the game is much smaller this time.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 15:28 GMT
#196
On June 20 2011 00:21 supersoft wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 20 2011 00:05 CjrNinja wrote:
Well, it looks like supersoft hasn't come back yet. I'm taking my vote off him and onto gtrsrs. His plan to pile all our votes and waste them on a modkill, negating ANY possibility of getting a mafia today and effectively turning day 2 into another random lynch day 1 is the scummiest thing i've seen so far.

Gtrsrs' personality change from a fearless tunneling townie to a passive, uncommitted scum is not unnoticed by me. Gtrsrs: If you think Drazerk is the scummiest so far, then fucking vote for him. There is no 100% certainty on day 1. By lynching a modkill, the day 2 certainty for lynching a scum will be no closer to 100% then it is today.

##Unvote: supersoft
##Vote: gtrsrs


haha, now I am back, so you may put your vote back on me if you wish.

I don't know what to say about gtrsrs... I agree with him, that we shouldn't randomlynch on day1 in general... mhh difficult situation. If we had a DT for sure, I'd also say, we better lynch a lurker/afkler... But since we cannot be sure about that...
From another point of view: If he was mafia, he shouldn't be interested in lynching a person that's afk. Best case for them is, if we lynch one of us who is contributing. So I think this position of him to lynch someone who probably gets modkilled doesn't convince me.
A more valid point is his passiveness...

How much time is left until nighttime?




Can you be more firm in your future posts? And since you came back what do you think of treadmill? Do you still think he's suspicious?


aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 15:40 GMT
#198
On June 20 2011 00:35 supersoft wrote:
wait a second, I have to make some notes.
pretty funny how strong your behavior changed from the last game when you were mafia :D
Is this a mindgame or are you really townie this time?


I learned from last game, and am trying a new style. It's a smaller game and it's much easier to press people here.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 17:52 GMT
#204
On June 20 2011 02:37 gtrsrs wrote:
noob exhibition number 1:
Show nested quote +
On June 19 2011 17:46 freeloader625 wrote:
It's time for my contribution. I actually had written up posts last game but never had a chance to actually post them up. I even had a Day 1 full defensive post but by the time I finished writing the tides have changed and rookie bandwagon couldn't be stopped and no longer had any reason to post it. Man that last game was hectic.


take a look at this crock of shit. how come no one has called him out on this?
hey last game i was actually getting my dick sucked by a fortune-telling gypsy, that's how i knew iGrok was mafia. and now that i've typed it it's true, no one can question me on it!

no, freeloader, you hadn't written up any big posts last game. you're a bad player piggybacking off good players. put down the keyboard son, we don't want to read your essay full of non-logic.

Show nested quote +
On June 19 2011 17:46 freeloader625 wrote:
Early post of game gtrsrs attacks me based on no evidence at all. In fact as apprudds pointed out, his post reeks of oxymoron, his attack is, “your post doesn’t help” when in fact his post doesn’t help either. So aggressive, but I understand why you would do this. You want me to speak up and post more. This would be a pro town play.


actually no you *don't* understand. i wasn't even attacking you here. in fact, my little grain of sand, i was pushing aprudds to not be so wishywashy. look at page 7 of this topic. aprudds pressures Drazerk and then IMMEDIATELY says "oh ho ho no no i'm not suspicious of you!" a couple posts later he jumps on freeloader's nuts then IMMEDIATELY says "nah brah i ain't mad lololol"

DEFINITION of wishy-washy. my post was intended to get him to keep his pressure on. he claimed he'd attack anyone for anything to prevent a boring game? okay then don't back down (ironic in the end that it'd be me he keeps railing on :facepalm: )


Show nested quote +
On June 19 2011 17:46 freeloader625 wrote:
Then his attitude changes from attacking to “no vote” passive play right when Drazerk picks up some serious heat with 3 votes and with "better evidence" than he had to attack me. Mighty scummy. Why wouldn't you wait to see his response? This play, gtrsrs makes a bunch of posts but at the end contradicts himself without seeming like it, therefore you just made your prior posts worthless. You seemed so out for blood earlier but now you don’t want any of it once drazerk is mentioned. You don't even wait for his defense. Why not? Weren't you pushing for all townies to speak up? Contradicting plays are usually what scum do, which in last game pushed the votes out and scored town the GF with a very close vote by one.

You try to justify your change to passive play, while trying to convince all townies to do the same. You claim to be not defending when actually defending and buying time. You first wanted to attack players for information, but now you try to say we should back off, cut our losses instead and be completely passive. Er what? So are you trying to get information out of players or are you trying to seem like you are trying to get information from players? Typical scum play is early on pushing hard to seem pro town and gain credit, but then later on try to convince players to instead to do the anti town play without town realizing it. In this case the the antitown play would be not voting potential scum drazerk to see his reaction and do nothing instead. He hasn't even posted anything yet!


i'm going to assume you're in second grade and they haven't taught you subtraction yet. let me set this up in a way that's easy to understand
we have TWELVE (12) players this game. the 1 holds the ten's place, it doesn't mean 1 + 2. 10 + 2 = 12. when we subtract 1 from 12, we get 11. when we subtract 2 from 12 we get 10. when we subtract 3 from twelve we get 9.
now, think back to the winning conditions of this game for mafia. when we lose enough townies, so that our town population equals that of mafia, we LOSE THE GAME. SO WHY THE FUCK WOULD WE WANT TO HASTE OURSELVES TO THAT POINT? you're claiming i'm mafia because i want to no-kill? YOU ARE RETARDED. MAFIA WANTS PEOPLE DEAD. if i was mafia i would explain why so-and-so are scum so we could lynch them with little-to-no-info. at the point i voted for lord vatti, we had NOTHING to go on. NOTHING.

take a look again at what we gain by RANDOM lynching on day 1 with a modkill on the block.
1) we lose a townie in Lord Vatti (12 - 1 = 11)
2) from a townie standpoint, assuming that you wouldn't vote for yourself, and you're not voting for Lord Vatti, you have a 3/10 or 30% chance to kill mafia on day 1. 30% chance to... what exactly? we don't reduce their KP by killing them. if there even IS a roleblocker we've only a 33% chance (10% overall) to hit him. so 10% to give our hypothetical blues a free reign? now look at the MUCH higher probability of lynching a townie. 70 FUCKING PERCENT OF GIVING THE MAFIA A FREE KILL. do numbers even REGISTER in your head? are you willing to lynch on a 30% guess?? on day 1 with our votes spread out the mafia *will not bus*. they can dilute the votes enough to keep their scumbuddy from dying. we will not get that lucky on day 1 unless we have a really solid case, which we didn't. ON TOP OF THAT, WE ALSO HAVE A CHANCE OF RANDOM LYNCHING A BLUE.



Show nested quote +
On June 19 2011 17:46 freeloader625 wrote:
Yet you seems so fast to defend him. If he flips green we made the wrong choice but at least we have effectively increased our chance to lynch red by having a list of potential suspects based on voting patterns and bandwagon jumpers. WHY WOULD YOU NOT WANT THIS LIST?


no, didn't defend him. claimed he was my FoS. i also said that as soon as Lord Vatti showed up and contributed, i would be happy to give my reasons to lynch Drazerk. if we're all present, and minimal suspicion is all we have to go on, i'm happy to go on that. but when we have a free mafia kill lined up, i'm not going to risk 70% chance of hitting a townie on a fucking HUNCH.



i will make my case against Drazerk next if necessary but for now you WILL take your votes off me. scum is already bandwagoning onto me and losing me this early will be a dire mistake. in fact i will go so far as to say town will not win if i get lynched day 1. you are game-throwing if you vote for me.


Well, I have to take a page out of your book and say

LOL U MAD BRO? U SOUND BUTTHURT. LOLOLOLOLOL SO DEFENSIVE U MUST BE SCUM LAWLS>>>>>!>!>!>!>!>

This entire rage post makes you look like a fool. You still haven't made a case. How about you make your case and let people to decide who to vote for. You can't blame people for wanting to vote you when your suggesting 'we shouldn't lynch and wait for 100% confirmation.' HUGE contrast back to last game where you didn't have any problems tunneling the shit out of someone day one.

Don't you dare criticize me for being wishy washy when you don't even have the balls to accuse anyone of anything. You suggest we sit here herping and derping wasting a lynch and waiting for modkills.

Get off your high horse, swallow your bloody pride and give people an actual reason to not kill your sketchy ass other then "IM NOT SCUM AND IF YOU VOTE FOR ME YOU MUST BE SCUM."
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 17:57 GMT
#205
EBWOP: Didn't see your post about xedat when I was making this post.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 18:04 GMT
#209
Alderan Why the sudden change of heart? Can you answer my accusations?
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 18:25 GMT
#216


it's like you people have already forgotten that we had FORTY (40, four times ten, the four holds the ten's place) players last game. we could afford random lynches and shitty bandwagons in the beginning. we have TWELVE people this game. a lynch is worth FOUR LYNCHES from last game. would you have randomly lynched four days in a row last game if four townies got modkilled on day 1? i sure as shit hope not.


Hey math genius, probability does not work like that. Stop pretending like it does.

i'm not being more passive this game i'm being more conservative. there's a difference. we gain nothing by random lynching today. take your heads out of your asses and this fucking "wasted" lynch mindset. just use your imagination and pretend we had a huge case against Lord Vatti instead. pretend he's posted a lot and we're 100% convinced he's scum. now vote for him. now it's not a "wasted" lynch it's just a mislynch. is that better?


So your asking us to PRETEND that Lord Vatti is scum to make the vote easier for us? What kind of backwards logic is that.

You of last game would be tunneling the shit out of you this game. HEY LOOK LOL HES BEING SUPER DEFENSIVE HE MUST BE SCUM TROLOLOLOL.





aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 18:35 GMT
#221
On June 20 2011 03:26 supersoft wrote:
this shit is getting out of control. I recommend to lynch Treadmill. this guy is completely useless + he proposed a really, really bad plan that included roleclaiming.

gtrsrs is innocent. Unbelievable. I reread the whole thread, and he's the only one that isn't suspicious to me.

I really don't trust aprudds. He is only agressively trying to be the townleader and control the action. But he doesn't lead us anywhere. He just jumps from target to target and accuses everyone, who posts something in here. Moreover is this guy smart enough to change his behavior without a reason - he doesn't need a new role for that.


Really Gtrsrs is the ONLY person that isn't suspicious? You sir need to get your brain checked.

Lynch Treadmill? You must have some BRILLIANT reasoning for this.

Let's see....

A)He's useless
B)He suggested a bad plan


Damn, with that reasoning we must all probably be scum. How can you judge usefulness on day one again?

Also if your suspicious of me why are you trying to lynch treadmill again? Because he's "useless"? So if we go by that logic we should ignore everyone suspicious and try and lynch everyone we think is "useless" right?

Can we please smarten up? If you really think I'm scum make an argument about it.

aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 18:39 GMT
#224
On June 20 2011 03:24 gtrsrs wrote:
okay it's getting to be crunch time

i really hate to compromise my logic in order to save myself but it's imperative that i do so.

Alderan, aprudds since i know you've both been active recently, please change your votes to Drazerk. i'm decently sure that Drazerk, Xedat, and CjrNinja are our mafia, jumping on freeloader's bandwagon to take the pressure off Drazerk.

I will change my vote to Drazerk as well, which will put him in the lead. I'd much rather vote Lord Vatti but if it's me or Drazerk it's gotta be big D.

##vote: Drazerk


Apologizes but I don't share your confidence gtr. Your going to have to let me make my own judgment on this.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 18:45 GMT
#228
Oh so there are 4 scum now eh? Need to take a few more grade 2 math courses Gtr.

Also if you insist gtr

##unvote
##vote: gtrsrs

I hope your happy.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 18:45 GMT
#229
oops sorry GM


##unvote
##vote: gtrsrs
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 18:48 GMT
#231
On June 20 2011 03:47 gtrsrs wrote:
just like iGrok last game, as soon as i tell you that you're doing something scummy, you change it so as to not look so scummy

interesting


Keep talking away, it will be funny when you burn scum
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 18:57 GMT
#236
On June 20 2011 03:55 gtrsrs wrote:
okay well 6 votes on me is enough.
i was going to wait til an hour before voting ended to do this but with lord vatti gone i will definitely lose this lynch if i don't act now

i am the town's medic. hopefully this should give you insight as to why i wanted to no-lynch today. i was hoping we'd have some outstanding townies show up that would make easy marks for the mafia, and i'd be able to protect one of them. it's kind of pathetic that you guys are forcing me to claim on day 1, your witch hunts are illogical and your inability to listen to reason is sad. in fact, for the sake of my blood pressure i'm glad i'll be dying tonight.

on the plus side, i think freeloader's bandwagon was enough to point out the likely mafia.

between these 4, i'm 100% sure that three are mafia:
Drazerk
Xedat
Cjrninja
aprudds


again i want to point out that i am claiming medic. i won't get a chance to use my powers since i will be dying tonight. but it is *imperative* that you lynch drazerk or xedat today instead of me. letting me die will put you at 9 townies tomorrow which is a HUGE set-back.


And I'm goddamn batman. You have noone to blame but yourself if you get lynched for how goddamn stupid you've been acting.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 19:02 GMT
#239
On June 20 2011 03:57 gtrsrs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 20 2011 03:55 gtrsrs wrote:
again i want to point out that i am claiming medic. i won't get a chance to use my powers since i will be dying tonight. but it is *imperative* that you lynch drazerk or xedat today instead of me. letting me die will put you at 9 townies tomorrow which is a HUGE set-back.


sorry, 6* townies, 3 mafia. 9 villagers total.

also since some of you will be skeptical of my claim: last game i was willing to die to get iGrok lynched. this game my play has changed (you have incorrectly labelled it as "passive" when really it's just more "conservative") but what's key to note is that i am NOT going to martyr myself to get Drazerk lynched. if you lynch me today you are gamethrowing, i'm NOT a vanilla townie whose life is expendable to get the GF lynched. you MUST lynch mafia today


Hey Gtr you realize claiming did nothing for you right? Your going to die either way now instead of having a chance of surviving. There would literally be no reason for you to claim if you were medic. Now your 100% guaranteed death rather then a chance of death. If you really where as smart as you say you are you should have realized this and kept your mouth shut.

Holy crap your stupid.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 19:19 GMT
#250
On June 20 2011 04:03 gtrsrs wrote:
if there are no counterclaims to medic and you vote me, you are gamethrowing, plain and simple.


Let's break this down shall we?

1 Mafia Role Blocker, 2 Mafia Goons, 7 Town, 1 Medic, 1 Detective
1 Mafia Role Blocker, 2 Mafia Goons, 9 Town
3 Mafia Goons, 1 Medic, 8 Town.
3 Mafia Goons, 1 Detective, 8 Town.

Are the 4 setups. Now you are claiming we are in setup 1 or 3.

Now let's say we are in setup 3 for simplicity sake.

Case 1: Your Town

This claim saves your skin day 1 and you gets killed night 1. You martyr yourself.

Case 2: Your Medic

This claim saves your skin day 1 and gets you killed night 1. You still die.

Case 3: Your scum

This claim saves your skin day 1 and lets you become a confirmed townie. You will try and flush out any other blue role that counter claims so you can kill them.

Hey guess what? There is only one scenario that claiming is optimal and that's if your scum.

If you were really blue you turned a 99% chance of death into a 100% chance of death. Real smart.

The ONLY alternative way I could see this being a optimal move is if your vanilla town assuming its setup 1 or 3 and attempting to draw mafia fire at night while you hope the medic tries to save you. But that's wayyyyy too many layers of WIFOM for it to be a credible defense.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 19:22 GMT
#253
On June 20 2011 04:21 gtrsrs wrote:
aprudds, the word YOU'RE looking for is "you're"
"your" is indicative of possession

"Case 1: Your Town" indicates that i own the town, which clearly isn't true

please try re-writing that in english

LOL U MAD?
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 19:25 GMT
#256
Noted, will correct in the future.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 19:34 GMT
#259


no. that's not how this game works. you don't lynch contributing players. you lynch lurkers. aprudds and Drazerk have spammed up the thread to bury my defenses of myself. they are taking over the game and not letting town think for themselves. i feel sorry for you guys if there's no detective.



Damn I guess iGrok was a lurker last game.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 19:37 GMT
#261
On June 20 2011 04:30 omgCRAZY wrote:
Pyo I see that you voted gtrsrs for his behaviour. Is there any other reasons? Just wondering because aprudds behaviour is the same or worse to me and I believe gtrsrs HAS given good defense littered in with the garbage.

Can we get a vote count!
I will be voting to save gtrsrs today as I think he is town(or medic as he claims) and aprudds is just being ridiculous in his attempts to keep pressure on him.

I think the case on Drazerk is not amazing but better than gtrsrs'. In an ideal situation I would like to vote for a lynch on aprudds. If enough people support this please vote for him.


##Vote: aprudds

Note: If enough people do not vote for apprudds before the deadline I will be switching my vote to Drazerk.


oho? I'm scum because I'm keeping pressure on who I think is scum? If you disagree make a better argument. I have yet to see a good analysis of me.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 19:38 GMT
#263
On June 20 2011 04:37 omgCRAZY wrote:
We still have 1 hour and 25 minutes. I urge people to vote for aprudds. I believe he is scum and if not, at the very least take the time to look back at gtrsrs' defense. It is solid, and he DOES backup his arguments with solid reasoning. There is no reason to lynch him today.

Vote aprudds or Drazerk.


Please list out the flaws in my arguments.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 19:49 GMT
#269
On June 20 2011 04:40 gtrsrs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 20 2011 04:34 aprudds wrote:


no. that's not how this game works. you don't lynch contributing players. you lynch lurkers. aprudds and Drazerk have spammed up the thread to bury my defenses of myself. they are taking over the game and not letting town think for themselves. i feel sorry for you guys if there's no detective.



Damn I guess iGrok was a lurker last game.


i don't really get what you're trying to accomplish here
if you ARE a townie, spamming 1 liners and accusing someone claiming medic is not going to help you win. in fact, as i've said before, if you're a townie and voting for me you are intentionally losing, you are gamethrowing. i know there is decent suspicion of me at this point, and you want to keep the pressure up, but the fact that you won't even look at this from the point of view that i COULD be medic just shows that you don't care about winning.

if you are MAFIA, then your accusations are only drawing attention to yourself. when i flip medic you're going to look really stupid and you will be a prime lynch/DT candidate. you played much more conservatively last game, so either you're a bored townie trying to be the hero, or you rolled mafia twice and you figured you better change your playstyle to "look" differently.

either way you're drawing so much attention onto yourself that i can't help but think either you're a much worse player than we thought you were from your stellar performance last game, or you're gamethrowing. that's literally all i can think of


I'm attempting your style of playing this round. How do you like tunneling? It's always good to try out different play styles to see which one matches especially since this is only my second forum mafia.

I'm also poking holes in your logic. Claiming medic is NOT OPTIMAL if you were medic. Think of it as a compliment gtr, I trust you were smart enough to see that claiming medic would not be optimal if you were medic.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 19:54 GMT
#272
I'm still waiting on an analysis of me supersoft and omgcrazy. If I was scum it should be simple to find flaws in my argument right?
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 20:03 GMT
#281
+ Show Spoiler +
On June 20 2011 04:53 gtrsrs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 20 2011 04:49 aprudds wrote:
On June 20 2011 04:40 gtrsrs wrote:
On June 20 2011 04:34 aprudds wrote:


no. that's not how this game works. you don't lynch contributing players. you lynch lurkers. aprudds and Drazerk have spammed up the thread to bury my defenses of myself. they are taking over the game and not letting town think for themselves. i feel sorry for you guys if there's no detective.



Damn I guess iGrok was a lurker last game.


i don't really get what you're trying to accomplish here
if you ARE a townie, spamming 1 liners and accusing someone claiming medic is not going to help you win. in fact, as i've said before, if you're a townie and voting for me you are intentionally losing, you are gamethrowing. i know there is decent suspicion of me at this point, and you want to keep the pressure up, but the fact that you won't even look at this from the point of view that i COULD be medic just shows that you don't care about winning.

if you are MAFIA, then your accusations are only drawing attention to yourself. when i flip medic you're going to look really stupid and you will be a prime lynch/DT candidate. you played much more conservatively last game, so either you're a bored townie trying to be the hero, or you rolled mafia twice and you figured you better change your playstyle to "look" differently.

either way you're drawing so much attention onto yourself that i can't help but think either you're a much worse player than we thought you were from your stellar performance last game, or you're gamethrowing. that's literally all i can think of


I'm attempting your style of playing this round. How do you like tunneling? It's always good to try out different play styles to see which one matches especially since this is only my second forum mafia.

I'm also poking holes in your logic. Claiming medic is NOT OPTIMAL if you were medic. Think of it as a compliment gtr, I trust you were smart enough to see that claiming medic would not be optimal if you were medic.


yeah, i can see that, you wanna be guitarasaurus jr.

look at the differences between me and iGrok though. he rage-quit when we singled him out. i'm claiming a role and trying to defend myself. i'm CLEARLY THE MEDIC.

how is me claiming not optimal? somehow a lynchwagon got started on me overnight by freeloader and the mafia jumped on it. i tried my best to not claim. i posted a bunch of posts saying why voting for lord vatti would be a bad idea and you and drazerk covered them up in spam. i didn't claim until i had 6 votes. with Lord Vatti afk, 6 votes is the majority. i was FORCED to claim. it was obvious that no matter what i said, you'd bury it in one-liners and prevent people from reading my arguments


No I don't see any substantial evidence that your the medic. I posted before why claiming is NOT optimal. I'm sure you've seen it and read it.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 20:13 GMT
#288
EBWODP: aprudds subsequent posts change the pressure wholly onto gtrsrs while changing his vote from Drazerk for more poor reasons. (Doesn't want to actually lynch his buddy)


On June 20 2011 05:12 omgCRAZY wrote:
LOL Drazerk is so confusing. I think he may be town. Which convinces me more that aprudds is scum.


Wait wait, isn't this completely contradictory?
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 20:24 GMT
#292
On June 20 2011 05:16 gtrsrs wrote:
aprudds i URGE you to change your vote off me. if i'm the medic the mafia will kill me tonight anyways. if they don't, i have a chance to save someone. i'm quite convinced you're town now based on drazerk's voteswing and i think you can redeem yourself, please take your votes off me.


I think your scum man. Like you said, you're a smart analytical guy, and if that's true there was no point for you to claim. If I think someone is competent I have to look at them like a unforgiving machine and that unforgiving machine part of me is telling me that claiming day 1 like that will only benefit scum.

aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 20:29 GMT
#295
On June 20 2011 05:26 gtrsrs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 20 2011 05:24 aprudds wrote:
On June 20 2011 05:16 gtrsrs wrote:
aprudds i URGE you to change your vote off me. if i'm the medic the mafia will kill me tonight anyways. if they don't, i have a chance to save someone. i'm quite convinced you're town now based on drazerk's voteswing and i think you can redeem yourself, please take your votes off me.


I think your scum man. Like you said, you're a smart analytical guy, and if that's true there was no point for you to claim. If I think someone is competent I have to look at them like a unforgiving machine and that unforgiving machine part of me is telling me that claiming day 1 like that will only benefit scum.



YOU FUCKING SCHOLAR, YOU FUCKING GENTLEMAN, I HAVE EXPLAINED MULTIPLE TIMES THAT I CLAIMED BECAUSE THERE WERE 6 OUT OF 11 VOTES ON ME; EVEN AFTER I TRIED TO PULL VOTES OFF MYSELF WITHOUT CLAIMING, I ONLY NETTED 2 MORE VOTES ON MYSELF. STOP SPAMMING AND TAKE YOUR VOTE OFF ME


So I can get myself lynched? You do realize your asking me to kill myself when I know I'm town for someone who I think is scum.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 20:29 GMT
#296
sorry you're*
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 19 2011 20:33 GMT
#299
On June 20 2011 05:31 gtrsrs wrote:
we should put our votes onto drazerk. an unexplained voteswitch with the tag "i'll explain <after the lynch has occured> is unacceptable" especially from someone who has been fingered as likely mafia. we should all switch our votes to him. unfortunately, people are voting for YOU aprudds, which i think is wrong. i don't think you're mafia, i just think you're the worst town player i've ever seen. i am CLEARLY town. take your vote off me, put it anywhere else, not on yourself


Sorry mate, you know just as well as me that you're just trying to get me killed.

P.S. The fact that you haven't vote switched tells me alot about your motives.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 20 2011 01:24 GMT
#366
Damn guys, I leave 20 minutes before the lynch and it turns out I die.

Ahh well, I'm a bit disappointed. GL town.
aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 20 2011 02:23 GMT
#368
On June 20 2011 10:46 Drazerk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 20 2011 10:24 aprudds wrote:
Damn guys, I leave 20 minutes before the lynch and it turns out I die.

Ahh well, I'm a bit disappointed. GL town.


Sorry bud my mistake on changing my vote

aprudds
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada144 Posts
June 24 2011 13:06 GMT
#554
On June 24 2011 17:35 Xedat wrote:


As a little advice, mafia should starting cursing now.

I agree.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 47m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 228
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 20369
Sea 6694
PianO 346
Snow 120
Shine 78
ajuk12(nOOB) 20
yabsab 13
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1217
NeuroSwarm200
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1407
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang01037
Other Games
summit1g7245
shahzam883
WinterStarcraft551
Mew2King91
Trikslyr33
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream2305
Other Games
gamesdonequick1156
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH304
• practicex 32
• davetesta6
• OhrlRock 2
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki13
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1289
• Stunt1209
Other Games
• Shiphtur1011
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
4h 47m
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
WardiTV Qualifier
10h 47m
PiGosaur Monday
18h 47m
RSL Revival
1d 4h
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
1d 18h
The PondCast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Harstem vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
[ Show More ]
SC Evo League
4 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #3 - GSC
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.