TL Mafia XLII
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'm blanket-hexing the whole town so at least one person drops and I get replaced in. *hexhexhex* | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I won't let ya down coach, I promise. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Alignment: Confirmed. Masonic Circle: Processing.......Processing...... | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
muahahahaha MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA AAAAAHHAAAHAAAAAAAAAAA No, seriously...I promise. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + ..........I just want to feel special. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
The power-roles are there as tools to be used as necessary, not crutches to base our entire game upon. This message has been brought to you by a noob. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
The difference is that you said it in the context that the only way to find them is to let YOU analyze their behavior and let YOU tell us who to kill. I don't care how new you are or how bad you are at the game, that just SOUNDS like a bad idea. Tell me I'm wrong. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
His plan involves as many people masoning him as possible and him finding scum through behavioral analysis in PMs. For my part, I don't like the plan because A) we'd be placing a lot of trust in ONE person who, aside from coming up with a "foolproof way to find scum", has given no reason for anyone to trust him whatsoever, and B) because then half the towns mason power is entirely tied up in finding, what, 2 or 3 mafia? That's not an even trade later in the game, when our mason power becomes even more effective. I realize that not all of what I said is original and may be incorrect, but I'm just trying to sort through all the nonsense in the thread right now about plans and PM circles. Forgive if I've overlooked some key aspect that makes this plan seem anything but anti-town. @RoL Someone at the beginning of PTP said 'If someone claims to be the goddamn batman, that should make you MORE suspicious, not less." I agree with this statement. Previous games aside, we know NOTHING about who or what you are in this game. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 15 2011 14:52 ilovejonn wrote: hokay there buddy. First off, I'm not going to make a rebuttal out of every point you made because clearly with your PbPA you're stretching a lot of points to justify a conclusion you already had in mind beforehand with posts that don't actually add anything. Also, don't try to do a meta-read on me, I might be playing different because I want to, I may be playing different because I've learned a few things, I might like to use "I think" or "unless of course" because I deemed it necessary to show that I am unsure (it was n0 after all). When you meta read someone, you're heavily biased to see what you wanted to see in the first place anyways. Let's read one of those points: What makes you say a townie wouldn't do that? Wait a minute, I read my post again and what? You take those words out of context and shape them into something that you deem scummy. I lol'd. It also seems to be a recurring theme in your analysis. I'm done here because I don't want to waste time defending myself when I could possibly find scum, but I like the direction you're going for generating discussion since there aren't any posts since Day 1 started, so thanks. This is ilovejohn's defense post. I do NOT see this post as scummy. Reading the post YM is referencing, the "uncertain" language IS taken out of context. It's too early, in my opinion, to use metagame to analyze one's "play" this early in the game. For that reason, WILL NOT support a lynch of ilovejohn this day unless someone comes up with some actual evidence. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 16 2011 12:50 sinani206 wrote: That wasn't supposed to be a joke. I said to read SNMMIII because there was a bandwagon for me day one (I was veteran) and the same thing is starting to happen. But then I realized not only did youngminii play in SNMMIII, but he had just said in his above post that he did not think I was scummy that day. So I realized that was completely invalid and told the town to ignore it. In addition to not really contributing (the going trend for voting Sinani), he responds to and even QUOTES a request to contribute by clarifying something Varp said, so he doesn't look scummy. ##Vote sinani206 | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
So....that's it? Just...vote and you're off? I almost wish you'd been mod-killed... | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
What are your thoughts on the aidnai/ilj/sinani206 Lynch Prospect? I for one agree with youngminii's assessment of the vote-list so far. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I find it interesting that in the reasoning behind voting for ilovejohn, you mention both youngminii AND Mig as influences, yet they're both voting for sinani206. Why do you feel ilovejohn is the better lynch? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
##Vote: grassgiraffe I admit that I sheepishly voted sinani based on weak logic and the desperate hope that he'd actually flip red. I agree that inactivity is more effectively dealt with now rather than later, and I hope the remaining lurkers after today will see GG as an example. HA...GG. GG, GG. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 16 2011 13:43 ~OpZ~ wrote: Good. Then You're a fine lynch candidate. I'm voting you. You have sucessfully completed 9 out of 10 scummy things. The tenth is to die red. OpZ...this is the post coinciding with your vote thread. His post here was apparently enough to tip the scales for you from you being indifferent about who to lynch between aidnai, ILJ and sinani to now tunneling HARD to get ILJ lynched. What was so scummy about this post that pushed him over the edge for you? To me, this post seems, if not a little obvious, at least true. What's the beef, brah? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I didn't vote for sinani for inactivity. I voted for him for lacking content in his posts...which DID exist. He's active. He's just not very helpful at the moment. What I find interesting about your answer is that you never really mention that as your reason until now. You just skip directly from indifference to tunnel-vision, not really giving any reason why he's the best lynch. But you do insist people change their votes. You even order them to do it. Let me ask you this: you find someone who CLAIMS they're going to be inactive for X amount of time, a transparent act, MORE scummy than someone who pops in for LITERALLY ONE post, just to hop on the nearest bandwagon and disappear again? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 17 2011 07:29 sandroba wrote: Okay people I ask you to turn your attention to this post: Serious scum slip right here. First of all, your reasoning for not voting jonn, which you are suspicious of, is totally bullshit. Second, how the fuck can you be 90% sure giraffe is town from the grand total of 1 post (which is a terrible post) he has made so far? Seems to me you have more information than I do. Even then, you are 90% sure he's town, you are suspicious of jonn and you quickly jump on giraffe bandwagon??? Hello contradiction! Vote for this mafia right now, day1 doesn't get any better than this. I literally saw the exact same thing in that post...and ALMOST posted about it...but I don't feel it's a strong enough 'slip' to justify changing my vote again. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Good. @sandroba You're campaigning to lynch Hiro based on ONE post. It's not even the most scummy thing he's done today, why not go back and try and actually convince someone to join your crusade? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Don't take this as me defending Hiro - I'm more asking you to bring something more...substantial to the table. It shouldn't be too hard if you're certain he's the best lynch for tonight. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
He's either trying to protect someone by shifting votes last minute or making some kind scum-hunting-power-move. I'm more inclined to believe the former. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'm not saying he's trying to hide his vote...I'm saying he's trying to get others who have already voted to unvote and vote for Hiro. And I find that particularly scummy by itself...especially since the town is GOING to lynch either ILJ or GG today it would appear. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
@aidnai I didn't TRY to make Sandroba look scummy, he did so all by himself pushing Hiro based on NOTHING. His campaign was based on a SINGLE POSSIBLE scum-slip and nothing else. If you people call that content, your leniency is Legendary. At any rate, I don't think he's scummy because he wants to vote Hiro. I think he's scummy because he's better than he's posting. Maybe he just knows how to get what he wants, but to me it looks pro-town in all the WRONG ways, if you know what I mean. And I think you doooooooooo. ##Unvote: grassgiraffe ##Vote: hiro protagonist For repeatedly attempting to derail constructive town conversation, debunk scumhunting and intentionally promote an anti-town environment. NOT because of a scum-slip. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
*group hug* | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Posting like a 3 year old will do that. If you think people should listen to you, make ALL of your posts actually informative like your case against RoL. It was a bit long and could use a few spoiler tags in there for cleanliness...but aside from that, you had some good thoughts and clear stances. But when 90% of your posts are admittedly INTENTIONALLY cryptic, peoples' first response is 'Oh, Kenpachi posted...NEXT' | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 18 2011 05:21 sandroba wrote: Alright people here comes my lists: VIGs: -Giraffe -LandenC Both extremelly inactive and based on voting thread alone Giraffe has a high chance of being mafia. His flip is also very informative regarding Hiro's aligment and revealing some info on the players that voted for him. LandenC is likely mafia if giraffe is not (he voted for him for the exact same behaviour he was presenting) so pick your target wisely. If RoL shows up and actually confirms kenpachi being mafia he's also an obvious target. Also his huge post attacking RoL is completely out of character from the townie kenpachi I know. Medics: -RoL -Aidnai -Wiggles -Varpulis -BC That's actually going to be hard to argue, but this is my gut feeling. I actually also don't see the point of arguing hard why I feel those players are town and helpful when no one of them are actually in danger. Do not protect: -Hiro -GGQ -LandenC -Grassgiraffe -Youngminii -kenpachi -Mig mostly useless lurkers and suspicious people. GGQ is there for (hopefully) obvious reasons and youngminii is there not only because he spearheaded jonn's lynch, but also because his voting paterns are suspicious as hell. Mig is not being helpfull the way he normally is when town. DTs: -Hiro -GGQ -Young This should be fairly obvious aswell. A agree with at the very least your vigs list. Not only are those two suspicious based on the voting patters, but inactive as hell too. I endorse any plan that involves Vigs going after inactives, as that means we don't have to waste DT checks or lynches on them. Obviously, if they're HIGHLY inactive, letting them suck on a modkill is the best way to handle them. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 18 2011 08:00 Shraft wrote: I actually believe that it's very easy for scum to blend in by commenting on this list. All of this is really basic stuff really. Speaking as a noob, NONE of this stuff is basic, brah. I notice that you didn't give YOUR opinion on it, aside from saying it's basic. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 18 2011 08:10 Shraft wrote: Yes, because it's very easy to just provide a few names and comment on the list. "I think yadddayaddayadda blablabla" and it looks like they have contributed. Instead of this, I urge blue roles to read posts like this: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=232671 (I believe this was linked previously) and take use of that knowledge when they chose their night actions. The point isn't to see who doesn't contribute, it's to get information. See who thinks who should be checked and why...so that when someone dies or we get information back from blues, we have that much more information to check it against. People put a LOT of emphasis on whether or not someone is "contributing" and I think it's going to lead to a LOT of town deaths in the games to come, with as many noobs as are joining games these days. I'd like to say that, for my part, it's hard to "contribute" when ANYTHING someone says is typically greeted with "empty contribution is empty... X is scum" I'm sure you'll see this post as an empty contribution...but the point of it is to ENCOURAGE people to comment on sands list, as I think it's going to be important come morning. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Thanks Sand for trying to get a discussion going, you get +Town from me for what it's worth. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 18 2011 08:44 Shraft wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 18 2011 05:21 sandroba wrote: Alright people here comes my lists: VIGs: -Giraffe -LandenC Both extremelly inactive and based on voting thread alone Giraffe has a high chance of being mafia. His flip is also very informative regarding Hiro's aligment and revealing some info on the players that voted for him. LandenC is likely mafia if giraffe is not (he voted for him for the exact same behaviour he was presenting) so pick your target wisely. If RoL shows up and actually confirms kenpachi being mafia he's also an obvious target. Also his huge post attacking RoL is completely out of character from the townie kenpachi I know. Medics: -RoL -Aidnai -Wiggles -Varpulis -BC That's actually going to be hard to argue, but this is my gut feeling. I actually also don't see the point of arguing hard why I feel those players are town and helpful when no one of them are actually in danger. Do not protect: -Hiro -GGQ -LandenC -Grassgiraffe -Youngminii -kenpachi -Mig mostly useless lurkers and suspicious people. GGQ is there for (hopefully) obvious reasons and youngminii is there not only because he spearheaded jonn's lynch, but also because his voting paterns are suspicious as hell. Mig is not being helpfull the way he normally is when town. DTs: -Hiro -GGQ -Young This should be fairly obvious aswell. Vigs Is it really worth killing off inactives with vigs? I believe vigs are too useful to waste on this. As far as I know, we got zero read on them both, so they might very well be inactive townies or blues. I don't really like the mindset that "If they are not helping the town we might as well kill them off." DTs I agree with the list made. Those people are all kind of fishy. Medics I think medics should simply protect the forum vets (basically the people on the zodiac list) since they will be very helpful with analysing everything later on. I don't know if RoL is worth protecting though, he seems like he doesn't take this game seriously at all. He just posts a few troll posts and says that he'd rather watch 24. I don't like his attitude a single bit. Your point on vigs: I disagree. While I agree that LYNCHING inactives is typically a bad idea, Vigging them is MUCH better. You have to get people to VOTE to lynch inactives...which takes A) time away from scumhunting, and B) space away in the thread which could be used for scumhunting. The less A and B we have, the better an environment for scum. And the idea isn't just to get RID of people deemed 'not worth keeping around'...the idea is to reduce the places scum can hide, and inactives is a GREAT place for scum to hide early. I agree with your points on DTs and Medics. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
[QUOTE]On June 18 2011 08:52 Mig wrote: vigs landen/giraffe are fine.QUOTE] Again, why am I here? Me and you Mig have the same amount of posts. So this from sandroba's list: [QUOTE]On June 18 2011 05:21 sandroba wrote: Both extremelly inactive and based on voting thread alone Giraffe has a high chance of being mafia. [/QUOTE] Is just not true. Also curious about what you meant sandroba about giraffe being a high chance of being mafia because of the voting thread. Is that because of the vote on sinani206? [/QUOTE] I believe he meant how there were a lot of votes on Giraffe that got moved to others closer to the deadline. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
First, Mig clearly DID read what you wrote...but his point stands. Even if you ARE town, a DT would be HARD PRESSED to clear you without outing himself...your posts are just too scummy to make a decent case for your innocence without claiming. Also, what do you mean you're an easy target? Why would Mafia waste KP on someone who appears to be the subject of tomorrow's lynch barring some sort of biblical-level scum-slip...not the kind you made, but something truly EPIC. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 18 2011 10:07 hiro protagonist wrote: EBWOP: Vis, I meant an easy lynch target, not mafia hit Ah, I see. Yes, you are that...but not just for Mafia. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
So you're proposing Sandroba's OG plan AGAIN?! JESUS EFFING CHRIST | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Does anyone know who these guys were linked with mason-wise? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Reasons to follow (when I'm near a computer -.-) | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I honestly hope I'm not the only person to do this. He either doesn't want to play, is scum, or is waiting for the proper amount of pressure. The answer to all three options is a vote. ##Vote: RebirthOfLeGenD | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 19 2011 03:01 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I feel like I should inform all of you that I may have killed Aidnai. We were playing BW and I was trying to show him how to port forward and told him to reset his router, I didn't realize he wasn't hardwired and he walked away before I could give him the rest of the directions to fix it. So I dunno when he's going to figure this out. I sent him a PM with the directions on how to reconfigure his network and port forward, but he hasn't responded yet so I can only assume that he hasn't fixed his internet yet. OMG dude...useless information is useless. It would've meant something if someone had noticed that he was gone for a while, but as it stands this post is absolutely meaningless, especially considering half the town is voting you so you'll contribute. The longer that goes by that RoL does NOT contribute, the more sure I am that I have NO need to change my vote once he DOES post some kind of contribution. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
In the meantime, you still have like 4 or 5 votes on you, and I for one like where my vote is at for now. I'd like for some veterans to weigh in on RebirthOfLethargy's inactivity. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
RoL actually has SIX votes on him. That's a fair amount of pressure, as the last lynch was decided between 7 votes on ILJ and 6 on hiro. But as his play is legendary, we should assume his tolerance to pressure is legendary as well. Just sayin | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
That suits me. I was never after you doing all the work, you've presented a decent case against Syllo and now I'm satisfied that you've contributed. I've unvoted you. @Rest of Town The only reason I was so vocally trying to get RoL to contribute is because A) he's on the damn list and that's what we're SUPPOSED to do, and B) because honestly, his behavior d1 DID appear scummy to me. It STILL looks scummy to me. But he's ABSOLUTELY right about the thread. If he were mafia, someone would be in here defending him. As for my case against Hiro, it's coming. But I'm LITERALLY laying in bed next to my wife, and I don't have the cognitive capacity currently to coherently explain my points. I'll look at the facts early tomorrow. But as a teaser, chew on this. Hiro had literally NO input on the Zodiac List n0. Practically didn't even acknowledge it. This is in SPITE of several vets speaking up in support of it. And someone on the list got pwnd n0. My guess? Scum were instructed to talk about anything BUT the list unless they knew what it was and how to sound intelligent about it. Anyway, I'm done tonight...I WILL get a case together tomorrow. Thanks for contributing RoL. I'm certainly going to go look at Syllogism's post more thoroughly. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Night Zero + Show Spoiler + On June 14 2011 11:53 hiro protagonist wrote: anyone up for a little night time scum hunting... This is hiro's first in-game post. It speaks of an eagerness to start scum-hunting which sounds good on paper, aside from the complete lack of information to actually DO any scum-hunting. On June 14 2011 12:31 hiro protagonist wrote: @chaos: thats a lot of WIFOM in your questions. I think Varpulis has the right idea. ilovejonn has a good point to. Here is my opinion: 1. DTs: your discretion. 2. Medics: protect those that you think are strong players, Vets. 3. Vigs: dont put on you batman suit tonight. As for PMs, Im gonna save mine till daylight. I dont want to lose someone right of the bat. It goes without saying to save one PM for later in the game. The power of the PM choice gets stronger the longer the game goes on. This is his next actual content post. Please note that there's no actual content in this post at all - simply restating what others have already said in his own words. Also note the fact that he notices chaos13's post about blue activity. chaos13 died at the end of n0. On June 14 2011 13:05 hiro protagonist wrote: Yeah, lets not put all our eggs in one basket. Lets not do any plans like this. I am sure anyone with a brain can see why this is a god awful plan. On June 14 2011 13:10 hiro protagonist wrote: EBWOP: I know its night time, and thats when we talk about blue roles, but lets not focus all of our energy into "what should blues do, and mansion me plz!!!" come day, lets focus on getting to know one another. On June 14 2011 13:22 hiro protagonist wrote: hell, even if you are town, Mafia is simply gonna spam you with PMs claiming there DTs and messing with you. There are so many ways this could go wrong... Its night fucking Zero! Do not claim. No plans. That is all. On June 14 2011 16:36 hiro protagonist wrote: <-----------Zodiac List is introduced RoL's masoning has nothing to do with Sandroba's plan... he just wants people to mason him. This is the end of his contributions n0. Interesting to note: he never once takes a firm stance on anyone. He claims to WANT to vote Sandroba, says he'll PROBABLY vote for a lurker...and ends up voting for ILJ, a bandwagon based NOT on inactivity, but on suspicion (apparently). Also interesting to note, he has literally NO input on the Zodiac List that several veteran players spoke up in favor of. Doesn't even mention it. Instead, he speaks EXCLUSIVELY about the list. Day 1 + Show Spoiler + On June 16 2011 14:11 hiro protagonist wrote: Ok, I should have said hat I was gonna be gone most of the day due to the Stanly Cup finals. My bad. Would have been home sooner+ Show Spoiler + but I had to avoid the fucking riots -__- God dammit Vancouver @OpZ: I agree that some of those players look scummy. I am curtain that Mafia has all ready posted in fact. but after going though the thread, I dont see that many scum tells. There is just not enough for me to go on right now. Lets keep up the pressure on those three. FoS on Sandroba: Maybe I am reading this wrong, but Sandroba is know for Sticking his neck out with plans like the one he said. He is also really good at wiggling out of suspicion. It would make sense for scum to bate out talk on night one that would give them info on players, so they can better aim there hits. His plan did just that. So Sandroba, may I ask why you would say this on night zero? Would it not be better to wait till day 1 to bring this up? are you still interested in applying you plan? depending on his answers, I might vote for Sandroba. Otherwise, I think lynching one of the lurkers might be a good idea. On June 17 2011 06:28 hiro protagonist wrote: yeah, thing is Mig, BC is calling out those lurkers to post. It worked too. So step it up guys if you want to play. As for the lynch targets, sinani, and ILJ still look suspicious to me. ILJ more so, because his slip into lurker mode. I want to see him scum hunt, cus right now the only contribution I see from him is defending himself. However, I wont vote for him because he is under the gun, We have ample opportunity to see if he slips up, or scum tells. One person that is really flying under the radar is Impervious. So far all his post have had little substance, and smell sightly of scum. As for the lurkers, One stands out and thats grassgiraffe. The others have yet to post much but grass last post SCREAMS out "I made my vote, and I'm out". I know, because that sounds exactly like some of the lurkers in SNMMII. They would simply come in once or twice during the day and say,"yep, I agree with so and so, vote: name here". I am 90% sure he is town, and 100% sure we dont need him. come prove me wrong grass. ##Vote: grassgiraffe What I find the most interesting about this post is NOT the 'scum-slip' that most everyone else noticed. It was the safe-vote on grassgiraffe. He's been pushing Sandroba as scummy up to now, but not only hasn't presented any kind of case against him, but doesn't even vote for him. On June 17 2011 06:35 hiro protagonist wrote: @Wiggles: For the reasons I stated. If Grass comes in and says something, hell anything, that would be of an contribution, I will take my vote off him. I will urge others to do the same. If I had to vote for someone else, I would vote ILJ or Impervious. What? What about Sandroba? You've been pushing him as the most scummy so far, and you appear to just dismiss that line of thought entirely. So you don't find him scummy? You do, but find others MORE scummy? You don't think a lynch on him will be successful? Take a stance on something sir. On June 17 2011 06:39 hiro protagonist wrote: @OpZ: Yes, ILJ is indeed on radar. If he gets lynched tonight, I am fine with that. If he lives today, then I want ether him or impervious to stand trial on day2. On June 17 2011 06:46 hiro protagonist wrote: No, I rather the inactives not be here later on in the game. makes scum hunting so much easier. That's fine and well of course, if you intend to do any scum-hunting. So far, you've shown that no, you'd rather bandwagon to victory. On June 17 2011 07:27 hiro protagonist wrote: you guys make a good case for ILJ. @OpZ: I will not switch from one random lurker to another. I voted on grass for reasons I stated. also, for those that voted on some one and the only reason you voted for them is "yeah, I agree with XXX...", thats shotty play. you NEED to give your own reasons for voting for some one. not just other peoples reasons. As far as I am concerned, Grass IS the only lurker now (with ILJ being kinda lurky) If Grass shows up, then I will switch to ILJ. What I want is ILJ to show up as well. Also, just food for thought, but If someone states that they are not gonna be round much, It makes them an easy target for Mafia to mislynch... What I find interesting about this post is that he calls agreeing with people as reason for their votes "shoddy play". Why is this interesting? Have a look back at his posts. He has almost NO opinions of his own on anyone...and every 'advice' post he makes is basically restating something that 2 or 3 people have already said. On June 17 2011 07:39 hiro protagonist wrote: LOL, most of your accusations have no maret. but I will answer the few that you bring up: First of all, explain how my not voting for ILJ is total bullshit? I am 90% sure that Grass is town because he is acting like a board townie would. Any real scum would have chosen his words more carefully. You would agree, no? Lastly, no I didn't bandwagon anybody. I made a damn good post why I was voting Grass, and in that time three other people said they where voting for grass with much less reasons then I had. nice try Sandroba, got anything else for me? So begins the defense of hiro protagonist. What I didn't like about this post was that he defends his vote with "I made a post about it, and others voted with less reason, so ![]() People don't vote off lurkers knowing for 90% sure that they're town. People vote off lurkers because there's a VERY real possibilty of them being lurking scum. If they're not, yeah, they're not contributing anyway so it's not a HUGE loss, but the vote is made because they COULD be scum. Hiro votes GG knowing for ALMOST CERTAIN that GG is town. That's a scummy vote. Period. On June 18 2011 05:20 hiro protagonist wrote: -_____________________- I cant believe i did not realize that. FFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUU Well, my vote switch didn't actually change the out come of the lynch, It only made me look scummy lol. so that sucks. Let me be clear, I wanted GG to die, not ILJ. I still want GG to die... I got to learn not to say every little thing in my head, because apparently when you say more than one thing at a time people see it as a scum slip -__- This has got to be the weakest defense of a vote I've ever seen. "Oh man, I didn't notice. Not even when I typed it." Speaking of typing it: I couldn't find where he said in-thread that he was switching his vote. I looked briefly, and obviously I've been going through his posts...if it's in there, I don't see it. Just in the voting thread. I find that VERY scummy. It feels like hiding his vote. In conclusion, I feel like hiro protagonist is the best lynch candidate for today, based on his indecisive voting, scummy behavior and over-defensiveness. ##Unvote Vote: hiro protagonist | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
What's interesting is that you're encouraging checking/killing exclusively people on the RIGHT side of the effing lynch. Regardless of who's scummy among those votes, that fact alone is pretty scummy of you. What I find the most amazing is that it doesn't seem to be dispopular in the thread. If I wake up dead in the morning, I'm going to be VERY upset...... | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
No really, we either continue to scum-hunt, or do the thread average: wait until morning and start throwing FoS around randomly and lynch townies. Not to mention waste medics on people who aren't targets and suggest vigging/hatting townies. I prefer to scum-hunt, personally. Considering the luck, I'm going to just assume one of the few cops left is going to die and we WON'T get lucky with a productive investigation. All we have is the posts of the confirmed townies, the lurking/PMing vets barking orders that don't make sense and our scum-senses available to us. I for one am going back to look at the posts of the recently departed with the trusting eye that only a green-flip provides. Good luck everyone. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
BC, tell me how confident you are in his claim. I understand wanting to be cautious about it, but we're talking about a lot of wasted time. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
After losing 10 townies so far, you thought that maybe a 1 for 1 trade against a POSSIBLE mafia was a good idea? [/rant] Okay, well all we can do at this point is lynch Node assuming he's not mod-killed, right? I mean, you think he's scum...I haven't detected the FAINTEST hint of scum in any of his posts, aside from lack of them, but I'm a noob. So yeah? Lynch Node, DT check hiro, start scumhunting at dawn? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 21 2011 10:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Analysis is something that is only ever solidly reliable day 3 on. Yeah, that's a hell of a point that I didn't really think of.. It makes me feel less bad about my horrible analyses. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
...I typically DIE before day 3 | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Mataza you sly dog. Taking out Node and RoL back to back will be sweet. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
As completely as you've forgotten the conversation with Sandroba, it had to have happened...because he found it disturbing enough to confess to Mataza that he told you. Outing your masons at this point only serves to make you look desperate and graspy. Maybe instead of trust you, we trust the confirmed blue? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
~OpZ~ Soft Endorses RoL Plan + Show Spoiler + On June 15 2011 07:19 ~OpZ~ wrote: While I will gladly admit your amazing mafia hunting skills....Do you think by the end of night 0 you can find all the mafia by having mafia PM you. I'd be glad to mason you, but I feel it'd be a waste of time when I see your name pop up dead tomorrow.....Should I mason with BC instead? I like BC. BC's nice. Lol. Slow Down There, Killer! + Show Spoiler + On June 16 2011 13:24 ~OpZ~ wrote: No. I feel we have a very real possibility of a mafia between Sinani, aidnai, and ILJ....I'm fine with either one of their lynches.... The rest of the town does need to post. RoL needs to suddenly appear. Sinani...You ever gonna mason me...? On June 16 2011 13:43 ~OpZ~ wrote: Good. Then You're a fine lynch candidate. I'm voting you. You have sucessfully completed 9 out of 10 scummy things. The tenth is to die red. The Wagon That ~OpZ~ Built + Show Spoiler + On June 17 2011 06:25 ~OpZ~ wrote: Sinani was defending ILJ....actually...which is why I said lynching sinani would be a good idea....But ILJ said he would be afk for much of the weak, which means he should be the one to die. Stop pushing it away from him. On June 17 2011 06:34 ~OpZ~ wrote:We vote for who we feel is scummier. Not who we don't need more. Vote for ILJ please. He's going to be afk anyway, he went to lurker mode after other "suspects" appeared. He was defended early on by sinani, whom many have considered suspicious too. Can we just move on to killing him now? *quote someone voting GG* ...Wrong vote. I want ILJ voted for. Not GrassGiraffe. Come the F' on guys. On June 17 2011 06:35 ~OpZ~ wrote: They will NOT SEE HIM as an example. Please, change your vote to ILJ. Stop being a SHEEP. On June 17 2011 06:37 ~OpZ~ wrote: Change your vote now, as opposed to later, when inactives come rolling in to bandwagon the person with the most votes to "feel" cool. On June 17 2011 07:01 ~OpZ~ wrote: Because...It's been done a million times. Hell, BC and INCOG have done it before. "I'll be away for XXXX because of XXXX"...Good. Let's let one inactive get lynched, and the other inactive get away with it because he said he'd be inactive. I've even done that as mafia. I want him GONE because of that. BC, have you not done that as mafia? Do you not find that suspicious? How many of us have done that to add credit to our "inactivity" despite the fact that we were very active within our mafia circle. Why switch from one inactive, to another? How about you answer that? Still on the radar is a relative term. Lots of mafia get away that way, and switching to a random inactive at the request of a possible God Father candidate? Good Job guys. And Now For Something Completely Different... + Show Spoiler + On June 17 2011 09:28 ~OpZ~ wrote: Welcome back ilj....I'll change my vote from you, as long as you keep that quality of posting up. How do you feel about Hiro...? On June 17 2011 09:37 ~OpZ~ wrote: Actually...Lemme take a look at the voting thread, and shraft...As long as you remain active at the times you say I'll be fine with that. I work to...7 AM EST to 3 and or 12 (noon) EST most days. So I understand. But I'm not gonna take my eyes off of you. I'm sure you understand good sir. On June 17 2011 09:44 ~OpZ~ wrote: I'm removing my vote from ILJ and placing it on Shraft, because I don't feel I can get the wagon moved to Hiro. ILJ's sudden increase in posting has made me reconsider that he was just using it as an excuse and trying to hide. I think he should be given a few more days with his increase in scum hunting, and I promise to put more effort into looking for a new suspect in a little. Given with the time constraint, I'm going to move to someone that has voted for him, and trust a little in his gut. I follow my gut often enough. If you survive ILJ, I would consider communicating with you. What did he just say? + Show Spoiler + On June 20 2011 12:21 ~OpZ~ wrote: drats....why you gonna take my kp like that? Overall, my guess is ~OpZ~ is SCUM. I offer him up as a vig-hit tonight, along with my vote on RoL. Discuss. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 21 2011 18:30 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Can someone who is not retarded please do an analysis. Obvious misdirection is obvious. If you want to debunk my analysis, perhaps you could do it intelligently instead of insultingly? You're only proving my point otherwise. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
proven activity. Mah bad. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Is there any way your 'mafia tutorial' would NOT apply DIRECTLY to ~OpZ~ as well, if not more accurately than it applies to YM? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Not that I blame you, Jack Bauer is the man...I'm just saying...it's even outlined in my analysis (you know, the one you called me retarded over?) | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 22 2011 07:33 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I looked over my notes and I saw him push aidnai a bit day 1. That was actually what confirmed him as town to me, since ILJ was obviously a bad lynch the mafia have no reason to try to add more targets into the fray. I find it interesting how you're distorting the timeline around OpZ. 1st, OpZ pushes aidnai, based on spam. 2nd, OpZ claims indifference to lynching either aidnai, Sinani and ILJ 3rd, OpZ tunnels ILJ hard 4th, OpZ scum-switches to GG, an inactive lynch target that was already on the docket. GTFO scum. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 22 2011 08:09 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I didn't distort anything? I said I saw him push aidnai while ILJ was under fire. Tell me how I distorted any timeline? I didn't. First of all, he never 'pushed' aidnai. He voted for him once, said he had scum-spam, and let it lie. Second, if ILJ was so obviously a bad lynch, why did OpZ (your confirmed townie) tunnel him directly following him "pushing" aidnai? I'm not spamming the thread any further with this nonsense...you're trying to get me to argue myself into a corner. I regret asking you anything in the first place. GL with your lynch, I hope the rope fits nicely. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Apparently lightning...DOES...strike twice in the same spot. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
##Vote: RebirthOfLeGenD While I hate that there's no proof of Sandroba telling RoL in no uncertain terms that Mataza is blue. While I'm suspicious of Mataza's reaction to BC requiring proof. There's something I can't get past. RoL claimed Vigilante. First of all, the outside view of Vigilantes is the exact same as scum. They kill someone at night. Second, the only time I've EVER seen someone claim vig BEFORE someone is shot and killed....is when it's scum trying to save their life. What good does claiming do if it's true? Mafia will likely role-block him, so his plan of killing FudgeMunkey is out. All it serves to do is to save himself. Furthermore, I agree with Mataza's assessment that if the Mafia wanted RoL dead, they would have killed him n2 instead of FAKING some kind of super-play, and do so knowing there's no proof. As far as RoL's behavior, d2 he did literally just WAIT until a few hours before the deadline, then start throwing around insults until enough votes were off him. He's been actively lurking since the very beginning. I'm sure he and BC will tell you that it's because there's no point in playing until d3...but in doing so, town has literally been put in a position where we have to either trust in Mataza's plan, or believe someone as scummy as RoL to survive. If we don't hit scum today, we're dead. And I believe RoL is scum. I believe he's been actively lurking, sniping blues (they've had EXCEPTIONAL aim), and watching 24 the whole game. I conclude this post with something everyone should factor in. I'm masoned with Mataza. He claimed Veteran to me d1. This means that if he's scum, he fake claimed me d1, put on a show of crumbing DT (he's not very good at it, obviously), and ultimately waited until d3 to put his fake plan. It's too much of a stretch for me. Vote RoL. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 23 2011 05:24 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Yeah, using balance as an argument for alignment is really weak. It wouldn't be weak if we had more info...we just don't. The way the vets play this game (and the way the noobs sheep them), the vets live until mafia kill them or d3 and later when the vets have 'enough information'. I'm not saying it's wrong or anything, I'm also not condoning it. It's just the way the higher-level games go. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Preferably something more than 'stfu noob' if possible. If not, don't worry about it. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 23 2011 09:35 GGQ wrote: So good of you to start playing as soon as your life is on the line, RoL. For reference, *RoL and BC are both scum* For everyone complaining that this would be imbalanced, hosts aren't always going to follow the same rule of splitting the two 'best' players onto opposite teams, or towns will just start metagaming to find scum. There were a lot of good players in this game, it was balanced even if those two are scum. Plus this fits everybody's belief that the three remaining mafia are most likely newbie lurkers. PLUS having two such skilled players would explain how the mafia managed to turn this game into a miry fog of crap so quickly. BC has been largely useless right from the start of the game. His zodiac list fit mafia goals perfectly as it discouraged medics from protecting skilled players so he could pick off whoever he felt was a threat. He sets himself up as a town leader throughout day 1, then fails to lead the town in any direction at all. He has made no analysis and pushed no lynches except for vaguely encouraging inactive lynches which he of all people should know is a terrible idea. He happily bussed the most inactive player on his team in a situation where it cost his team nothing. He follows bad lynches and suggests using a vigi shot on 'whoever doesn't get lynched', as if he just doesn't give a shit who is scum and who isn't. But BC is a problem for another time (or for a vigilante if there's an enterprising young gunman out there somewhere). Right now we need to finally kill fucking RoL, whom BC is working his ass off to save. I can't believe his 'GUYS BELIEVE ME IM BEING SO SINCERE RIGHT NOW' act is convincing so many people to switch their votes. His posts have nothing in them except some frankly uninspiring analysis from someone desperate to dodge the lynch again. He's been caught in how many lies now? He pushed a plan that he admits was bad on night one for the sole purpose of keeping himself alive (wtf, seriously?). He contributed little to nothing all game, he's been caught straight up in a trap by a virtually 100% cleared townie, and now he's claimed vigilante. Good one, RoL! And what happens when your target is still alive tomorrow and you claim roleblocked? What is the town supposed to do then? It's not that hard, guys. Lynch RoL, shoot BC. TY. My name is VisceraEyes, and I approve this message. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
But you have nothing to analyze except pushing a townie lynch and defending yourself. Trust me, I looked. Now you have a couple analyses, but those were done under the gun and could be viewed as bussing your teammates since you were actually in danger at the time. Stop telling people PISWA...I think it's PISWAter. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
You're no more blue than you were 2 hours ago. Nothing is confirmed until RoL flips. Period. Make no mistake, you are NOT calling the shots around here. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
You have got to be kidding me. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Lying down is not a good defense. I learned that the hard way. I agree with Kenpachi that both of you cannot be scum. Not at this point. @Town Personally I trust BC more than RoL, but only because BC masoned me on request. If he were scum, he ABSOLUTELY would have saved his mason for someone who actually mattered. I do not DISTRUST RoL for pushing a bad lynch. The whole town has been doing that all game. I distrust RoL for the reasons I stated before, and because I believe Mataza's claim. But as far as I'm concerned, NOTHING IS CONFIRMED UNTIL ROL FLIPS. I'm going to say that again, but this time bolded and in color. NOTHING IS CONFIRMED UNTIL ROL FLIPS So medics, keep trying. DTs, focus on people you DON'T think are likely to be godfather. Vigs/Hatters, STACK on RoL. He should die tonight. You were given your power for THIS moment. That is all. Good luck. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
WALL OF TEXT INCOMING | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I posit that Mataza is a Mafia Godfather painted to appear to checks as a Veteran. My Theory: Mataza's plan was in fact, wholly fabricated. I don't doubt that sandroba THOUGHT that there was a plan, I just think that sandroba trusted the wrong person. First, the facts: 1) I masoned Mataza and Node n0. 2) I requested that BC mason me. He obliged. 3) Blue-sniping has been INCREDIBLY accurate this game. 4) We haven't lynched a SINGLE Mafia member yet. 5) Node flipped Red from Night Kill (hiro protagonist) 6) BC is BC. RoL is RoL. They're way better than anyone else in this game. My Argument: My argument has 3 phases: PMs, Posts, Conclusion PMs I'm going to paraphrase what happened in my PM world. If any of it is unclear, I'll gladly clear everything up if I live through the night. First, and important to note: Mataza breadcrumbed DT to me in PMs and I called him out on it. He then told me that was a test and that he was really a veteran. I proceeded to tell him that I'm a Vanilla Townie through envious gritted teeth. I told him I thought Hiro Protagonist was suspect. I also told Node that I thought Hiro was suspect...but Node was afk. Node DOES end up responding however, telling me that he was 50/50 on Hiro. Then I flip out because I thought Mataza leaked my suspicion to the Mafia. I share this with Node, and he tells me that he finds my case on aidnai and sandroba worth mentioning, and that he does NOT find Mataza suspicious. Mataza then tells me he hadn't noticed Hiro. Asks my thoughts on GGQ. I do not give any. Mataza tells me he finds ILJ suspicious. I tell him I do not...that he's sheeping after YM and he should tell me why HE thinks ILJ is suspicious. He literally says 'I have nothing. Day 1 witch hunt - I burn the ugliest witch' d1 he tells me it's time for me to bring my suspicions to light in the thread...and proceeds to tell me how to present it. Makes it a point to say "I would do it, but it would steal your show and probably reveal that we are masoned together if you tell everyone that I covered all your points." In other words, "I want to appear as clean as possible on this non-scum lynch" The following day, he tells me he is suspicious of GGQ. Asks that I bring his suspicions to the thread if he dies overnight. Following hiro taking Node out, he asks again about my reads on GGQ and adds OpZ to the question. Also asks who else I'm masoned with. I tell him. Suddenly after he claims he was hit when Sand was killed, he's VERY interested in my mason with Node. Asks if I told him anything, and if I mentioned him in PMs. He also requests that I buddy him less in the thread. IOW, "People find buddying scummy and I don't want that over here guy...I have something to hide." He then reprimands me for removing my vote from RoL when RoL claimed Vig. Says that it promotes hesitancy. Posts Here are a couple posts that I find are key to my argument. + Show Spoiler + On June 16 2011 04:16 Mataza wrote: For clarification: 2:40 he announces "vote GGQ" in the thread, but didn´t vote in the voting thread. Then 30 minutes later at 3:09 he decided to announce "vote: aidnai" and then actually put it in the voting thread. What bugs me about this post is that he's pointing out clerical error as something that should be suspect. I could see this being scummy in the middle of the day, or with a tight lynch, but 1/4 way through the day? It smells more like trying to sprinkle doubt on a bandwagon that's already picking up steam. Interesting to note: Mataza is inactive for the VAST majority d1, after adding his vote to ILJ. This, AFTER claiming his vote was to add "just a tiny bit of pressure". Most of the people who started the wagon abandoned it when ILJ showed up. Not Mataza. + Show Spoiler + On June 21 2011 12:33 Mataza wrote: As per your request:+ Show Spoiler + [19.06.2011 20:57:37] Sandro : If you dont get shot tonight how do you feel about doing the same with bc [19.06.2011 20:57:43] Sandro : assuming I'm alive till then [19.06.2011 20:57:52] Mataza: sending him a heart? [19.06.2011 20:57:57] Sandro : lol [19.06.2011 20:57:59] Mataza: or telling him im a blue role [19.06.2011 20:58:08] Sandro : not telling [19.06.2011 20:58:12] Sandro : just crumbing [19.06.2011 20:58:22] Mataza: hinting breadcrumbing ya [19.06.2011 20:58:32] Sandro : like, that mataza fellow is kinda suspicious [19.06.2011 20:58:43] Sandro : he contacted me day1 to fish about my plan [19.06.2011 20:58:49] Sandro : and just leave it at that [19.06.2011 20:59:18] Sandro : if he's mafia he's gonna auto assume you are blue [19.06.2011 20:59:44] Sandro : like vig/dt/medic [19.06.2011 20:59:48] Mataza: I don´t think it works well if you do it intentionally [19.06.2011 21:00:24] Mataza: you can, but contacting him only to tell him nothing and breadcrumb I´m blue is kinda weird The part about him telling RoL right away was in IRC, and I have no proof for that whatsoever. It was spontaneous by him as I asked him a cryptic question. After the explanation he thought it was bad, after I told him I´m Veteran he was happy he did it. If you want to discuss it indepth mason me or something. Please note the early admittance that he has no proof of the 'nail in the coffin' whatsoever. + Show Spoiler + On June 22 2011 04:52 Mataza wrote: So your defence is that you think Scum decided to stop blue sniping, at which they were very successful so far, and instead do the following:
This isn´t ballsy, this is suboptimal. If scum would play this inefficient they wouldn´t win, because THEY ARE NOT KILLING ENOUGH PEOPLE. Do you know what *is* ballsy? You are: You get fossed early on, then don´t do anything. You wait a long period of time until someone says "He can´t be scum, scum will always pick alternate targets when they are on the block! Therefore he must be the greenest bro in town!" Pick an absolute horrifyingly bad lynch from the inactives. Take one no one ever had on their radar(Syllogism) before to look more genuine than sheeping an existing inactive lynch(Hiro Protagonist). Call the people on the less horrible lynch scummy by virtue of vote analysis(Vote analysis is horrible way to scumhunt). This was where I really started to believe Mataza. But I wasn't factoring in something VERY important. I'd probably call it the Mafia Axiom. Priority Zero: DO NOT GET KILLED. Priority One: Kill as many people as you can. This is key...the mafia's very FIRST RESPONSIBILITY to their team is to NOT DIE. Their numbers are literally their winning condition...when their numbers equal town's numbers, they win. Period. Yes, they've got work to do obviously. But what's the best way to do so, unfettered? Taking down one of the primary analysts/scumhunters. And who's more controversial/looks more scummy in this game, BC or RoL? It's a no-brainer. Mataza pushes Priority 1 as the most important. The reality is, Mafia spent all their KP on Sand EXACTLY to get rid of RoL. There was no guarantee that double-stacking would kill RoL, with all the masons and threat of medic protects, and he could be Vet...but you know what IS guaranteed to kill RoL? A lynch. The most ironic part is, when I reread this post, this was when I really started to DOUBT Mataza. I could literally go on all day quoting posts and why they're scummy when viewed from the stance that Mataza is scum and not Auto-Vet because of his claim. What everyone has to realize is that if Mataza is scum, he HAD to double-stack Sandroba, just as surely as if RoL was scum, he would have had to kill Mataza and Sandroba at the same time. Conclusion: I believe my mason with Mataza is partially to blame for the blue-sniping being so damned accurate this game. I claimed Vanilla Townie, and I'm sure I'm not the only one to have done so to the rest of the scum. I believe that Mataza planned from the very beginning to use his fake-claim to me for SOMETHING...and that opportunity presented itself when sandroba told Mataza that he was in danger. Mataza knew he was in no danger. But a TOWNIE believes that he is. And THIS, he could use. Node was scum, and he defended Mataza in PM to me. Node also voted for RoL. Once the ball was rolling against RoL, the pressure was on. He HAD to get results in order to LIVE. So RoL tunneled. He tunneled like...something that tunnels...really hard. He claims he needed YM to flip to confirm something. I don't doubt that at all. I've already stated that I don't believe RoL is guilty for getting YM lynched. As I said, we've ALL pushed bad lynches in THIS game. This is not a bad lynch. If Mataza lives through the night (hint Vigs: he shouldn't), you'd all better lynch him tomorrow. I'm going to die tonight unless I get medic protection. I'm going to assume that Mataza is now in charge of Mafia by default. Mainly because any vets on his team that approved this are noobs and should quit playing. I think Mataza ALMOST LOST it when RoL didn't get lynched, as I believe he was the main target...and suddenly, WHO is the Godfather when RoL lives? BloodyC0bbler, the OTHER primary analyst/scumhunter sided with town. It's laughable when you look at all the facts. I've been up all night guys, I've literally been UP ALL NIGHT figuring this shit out, because as a result of Mataza's ploy, I no longer trusted BC. So I had to come up with this shit on my own. If you outright REJECT my assessment, PLEASE do so levelly and fairly. I'm VERY tired, and I'll take it the wrong way if I get "LoLnOoBz0rZ" from ANYONE. I may have left some stuff out, if I did..if ANY part of this isn't clear to you, PLEASE ask me to clarify. I've never been more certain of anything in my life. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 21 2011 11:34 youngminii wrote: mm i'm betting my money on another explanation rol and node were going head to head quite a bit i know they could be doing the shift but the simpler explanation is usually the right one, and for now we should take that into consideration This message has been brought to you by a confirmed TOWNIE. Someone with no reason to look for an "Easy Lynch". Because he's dead. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I was not unwilling to believe your innocence. I was unwilling to see the painfully obvious. What I need from you now is to find the rest of the scum. I don't know where to start, and I have a feeling you do. It might be hard, as there could be another GF...but maybe not because Node was the other. We just don't know. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
No pressure my friend. ![]() This isn't paranoia. This is cold, calculated analysis of the fucked up situation as I see it. For the record, I never once, NEVER ONCE in my analysis brought balance into the equation. Go ahead, go back and read it again. I avoided it as a topic entirely. You know why? Because I believe that a town with RoL and BC is horribly imbalanced. But we GOT it yo. So I'm not going to use balance as a basis of my argument. Because it's horrible. As for the BC assumption, I agree with it entirely, as I outlined in my analysis. I don't think you necessarily specifically FEARED that RoL had all that protection, but that was certainly a possibility, and as unlikely as it sounds, even you have to admit that it's a possibility. And what's the only guaranteed way to kill someone you want dead? Have them lynched. He called THE scenario wtf shit. He didn't call your plan wtf shit. Your plan, if you were town and everything is as you say, was fine. What was wtfshit was the fact that you didn't have any proof of it and ALMOST THE ENTIRE TOWN BOUGHT IT. THAT is wtf shit. That's like, WTF...SHIT! | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'm assuming so, but I want him to spell it out for the rest of town. He should have flipped 'Mafia Goon', 'Mafia Roleblocker' or 'Mafia Godfather' if his role had been revealed...not just 'Mafia'. The point of the question is to raise the possibility that Mafia only have 1 PR left. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Would YOU pass up an opportunity like that? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
You want Meta? Mataza tried to get Town to commit to some kind of super-power-play in SNMMII, and he was lynched for it. By the way Mataza, you never DID clear up what exactly that was, and I've always wanted to know...just never remembered to ask. You want proof? I have none. I have only my story and my theory. I'm open to suggestions on how to clear it up, but I firmly believe that RoL is being set up. If I live through the night, I will NOT support his lynch tomorrow unless town is ABSOLUTELY set on it...by a VAST majority. Right up to the point where it becomes ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN town wants him to live, I'm pushing Mataza as hard as I can. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 23 2011 11:11 Mataza wrote: I AM CALLING THE SHOTS NOW GODDAMMIT. BC SCUM. ROL SCUM. If you are a Vig or a hatter, take a coin, flip it: If it lands tails kill Rebirthoflegend, If it lands heads kill Bloodyc0bbler. Medics you roll a die. If it lands 5 or 6, you choose for yourself. If it lands 1,2 3,4 you protect me. I am the blueest bro in town and I just lost my last mason, Youngminii. I knew he was green because scum tunneled him. They wouldn´t bus now, because it would drop their kp to 2. Assuming Youngminii was scum too along with RoL is also backwards ass logic. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
^ ^ This is a lie - you're still masoned with me to this moment. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Node defended Mataza in a PM to me. Node attacked and even voted RoL. A bunch of people did, but not a bunch of people are CONFIRMED SCUM. Node attacked sandroba and aidnai in a PM to me. Node defended Mataza in a PM to me. This is about all the proof I have. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 24 2011 03:33 Shraft wrote: I still find it very unlikely that mafia went through with an intricate plan like this for the sole purpose of getting RoL killed. The only way that he'd survive the night if mafia stacked 2 KP on him is if he is either a vet with one medic protecting him, or a regular townie with two medics protecting him (assuming this setup contains 3 medics) and I don't think there's a high probability of either of these being true. I mean, after D2's townie lynch that RoL pushed plus his bad attitude during D1, I don't see why there would be medics protecting him over the other vets/more contributing people. I actually think that the chance of getting RoL killed by carrying out this plan is drastically lower than the chances of killing him by stacking 2 KP on him. Also, I think GGQ touched on a quite good point: why would Mataza not fabricate Sandroba's blueslip to RoL if he wanted him killed so badly? No one except RoL and Mataza could know for sure what Sandroba said to him (RoL). If RoL called his bluff then Mataza could simply say that he was lying because he was being accused. To be frank, I also think that you're being a bit too paranoid. Whether or not it's true does not discount its possibility, the possibility I'm postulating Mafia were trying to avoid. The fact that it's possible lends to PROVE the credibility of my statement, not disprove it. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I never at any point said that it MUST be true. YOU are the one dealing in extremes, not me. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
You just keep digging yourself into a hole, Mataza. And GGQ, the fact that you're only questioning and responding to me leads me to believe that you're defending Mataza and it WILL be reflected on your permanent record. ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Literally....nothing. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 24 2011 05:28 Mataza wrote: Mr. Wiggles, to actually argue against coincidence: We know Sandroba was townsided. There are 2 possibilities:
Assuming I am town and did not lie about my plan against RoL. There 2 possibilities for how the outcome of the night happened:
Now, assuming Sandroba didn´t lie to me, I am not lying(because townies generally don´t have a reason to lie) and that RoL is innocent, then there must be some reason visible in the thread. If scum actually hit me and Sandroba for shits and giggles, then they probably didn´t even talk yesterday because there was no reason to talk. Your meaningless percentages that measure NO kind of probability aren't fooling me, and they certainly shouldn't fool anyone else in Town. Like, really? 0.7% Where did that even come from? Hyperbole, extremism and using town cred YOU HAVEN'T EVEN EARNED YET are your weapons of choice. Mine are logic, fairness and reason. Good luck in that battle buddy. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'm here to answer questions for whomever, but I'm not going to sit here and try and convince you that you're scum, Mataza. I'm sure that's what you'd like. It should be clear to town, based on my previous accusations, votes and stances that I have what's best for town in mind. Nothing has changed between yesterday and now besides who I think is scum and what I think really happened. I'll leave you to push your agenda as far as you think it will go. To everyone else, I hope you make the right choice. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
HA...Dodger...cause you've...dodged....lynches.... | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Srsly, gg guys. KICK ASS TOWN! | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Mataza's silly leadership ploy rubbed me the wrong way. I blame inactivity. But that's an easy wagon to jump on. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Curse you using the truth to further your malicious machinations...well done sir. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Thx for fun game btw! Re: PMs...Loved it. Loved the limit. Loved the mechanic overall. REQUIRES a compulsive Vig to deal with inactives, however. | ||
| ||