If I die n1 like I do in all the other games I've playtested I'm going to ***.

Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
If I die n1 like I do in all the other games I've playtested I'm going to ***. ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
1 Mafia Role Blocker, 2 Mafia Goons, 9 Town What's the use of a setup with a Role Blocker but no PRs? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I don't think we should try and cast a scummy light on people trying to learn to play the game. It's a NEWBIE game after all. That being said, I DO think we should try and actively analyze posts and make the best selection for our lynch as I've NEVER condoned random lynching. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Does this mean we cannot ##unvote and change our minds? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
First of all, it's a GAME. I'll be playing. You'll be playing. We'll be playing together. These are good, happy things. If I FoS (Finger of Suspicion) you, please don't get offended. I'm sure people will be pointing a finger or two at me, and that's just fine. As I have nothing to hide, I'll generally react with interest and intrigue more than anger and concern. I ask that out of courtesy, you guys do the same. I'll analyze EVERY SINGLE post you make, and I please urge you to do the same to me. We've got to find killers here, people! They're not gonna find themselves. Also, just so everyone's aware, I'll be most active in the later evening and will be virtually invisible from early-morning to early-evening. I'm not lurking during those times, I'm genuinely not close to a computer. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On May 16 2011 12:52 Mataza wrote: lynch and night kill. It means two people die between days. First day we are 12, and on day 4 we will be 6. If we never catch a maf, we lose then, because to vote we need to be more than 50% Townies. I think I overestimated my town ![]() Captain obvious also says: flamewheel91 is the Town Coach. Caller is the Mafia Coach. Qatol is the Neutral Coach. Asking the very basic questions is spam that doesn´t get us any information, which is anti town behaviour. I bet you 5 dollar that at least 1 mafia guy will pretend to not understand how the game works, if we keep asking dumb questions. We have Coaches for questions. After rereading this post, I have a question for Mataza. At the beginning of a game, one starts to think about their goals. Your first act in this game was to count the minimum number of days before mafia wins under optimal circumstances. Why is that? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Welcome to town! While I have reservations about Mataza myself, calling him trigger-happy is possibly unfair. We have to lynch someone today regardless, that's just a rule. It's our job to make sure it's someone nice and scummy. ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Here's the thing...there might be special roles in the game; we don't know that there aren't. We're merely operating under the assumption that there are no PRs because until there's a special circumstance, there's no way to know otherwise. At present, I'm not really badmouthing anyone. I'm asking questions. People asking questions aren't scummy, as asking questions is all we can really do (unless you count randomly pointing fingers). If you'll direct your attention to the post in question, it's clear that I'm just trying to clarify Mataza's intentions. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I shall refrain from unduly assigning suspicion to anyone until we've heard from most everyone. For the record, I don't condone policy lynching inactives...but if someone is VERY inactive in posting, but still makes it in for their one post per cycle and voting, inactivity starts to appear scummy to me. I hope no one is offended by my initial analysis, I'm just trying to spark up conversation. More conversation = more stuff to read over and over. I like to read stuff over and over. :D | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I've been keeping a written log of my thoughts on anyone who's posted anything of substance so far. Because of posts like yours and others concerned about undue suspicion, I've refrained from asking the questions I have. They're mostly questions of context and clarity, but I've kept them to myself as to not 'cause anyone to have any suspicion on them until we've heard from everyone'. If by doing only what I'm being asked to do makes me scummy, then by all means - continue this line of reasoning and see where it leads you. I understand you're suspecting me because I'm suspecting you (OMGUS) but that's all right. As I've said before, I have nothing to hide and you're entitled to your opinion. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'm going to go ahead and FoS: Mataza simply for the sake of argument and discussion. I've already given VERY little of why I think he's slightly scummy, and I have more at home, but I'd like to see some active discussion about Mataza as I don't appear to be the only one with doubt at this point. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
AS I'm sure you're already aware and eager to point out, my last few posts have contained very little in the way of content aside from my FoS. I have no defense for this aside from my assurance that it's because my notes are at home on my computer...a hindrance I'm working to resolve as we speak. I could obviously paraphrase, having the material to read here...but I've already laid it out and would prefer to wait on my notes. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I kinda get what GiygaS is saying, he's wondering why you went out of your way to point out something 'mafia is sure to do' knowing that you're also going out of your way (admittedly) to appear to do the opposite. You're just BEGGING someone to cry 'WIFOM' so you can say 'WIFOM, I don't fly that way my friend.' I didn't really catch that the first time, but it is awfully peculiar. Also, you seem to now be awfully set on painting me red when there are some inactives you've yet to accost for being 'not helpful to town' and 'useless'...why not wait until we've heard from everyone as you've been encouraging everyone else to do? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
It's moot anyway because you later stated that you were 'only raising a possibility of how mafia might act' instead of what it actually was, an insistence that they would, in fact, lay low to survive...which in my experience is NEVER EVER the case. So could we please drop the 'WIFOM' argument because I'm sick of seeing that anagram and remembering a wonderful scene to a mediocre movie. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'll speak soon to your point about me, but for the time being, thanks for speaking up at all. As Mataza so astutely observed, as one of the most active thus far in the thread (in regard to post number, I'm sure a lot of what I've posted is viewed as fluff) I'm absolutely one of the strongest candidates for a murderation tomorrow night. Active scum-hunters, honestly, could be viewed as stronger targets than even blue roles at this point when we don't have any idea if there even ARE blue roles, let alone who occupies them. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Mataza: + Show Spoiler + Had initial scummy feeling, but maybe he's just aggressively trying to scum-hunt. Please note the following excerpt. At first i thought I would claim cop openly, but then I remembered that I just once saw a game where that ever worked. And boy how often it does not work. This means one of two things. A) He's a cop and accidentally outed himself in his very first line in the GAME (I'm inclined to disbelieve this based on posts since) B) He's admitting that no matter what role he was given, regardless of alignment, he had toyed with the idea of claiming cop from the very beginning. This isn't so much an indication of guilt as it is a reason his posts make my scum-sense tingle...I mean, unless he's cop I don't know a good way to read that first line...and if he IS a cop, well, that's not much better is it? Also, this guy has done the math on how many people need to die before mafia wins...watch carefully. Appears to be antagonizing people trying to learn the game... Asking the very basic questions is spam that doesn´t get us any information, which is anti town behaviour. I bet you 5 dollar that at least 1 mafia guy will pretend to not understand how the game works, if we keep asking dumb questions. We have Coaches for questions. Further, he appears to be hanging inactives out to dry d1...which seems a little scummy to me considering the low chance of actually hitting a maf...especially if Mata IS red, as he'll know if/which inactives are red if any. Palmar: + Show Spoiler + Big post about how lynching greens is okay until d3...much like Mataza...but with an added twist. And as Mataza pointed out, no matter the setup, we do have available more than one mis-lynches, so even if we do stake a townie this first day, we aren't in any trouble really. And more importantly, even if the person that dies is green, then we at least already have very valuable information on the people that wanted him dead. I had less of a problem with what he said (as the logic is relatively sound) but more HOW he said it. Even if we stake a townie we aren't in trouble really. EVEN IF the person that dies is green. It seems to me that a reassuring soul would say 'Even if the person that dies is blue' which would be the worse case in this example. Weak read, but worth mentioning imho GiygaS: + Show Spoiler + Feels green except for how quickly he jumped on Mata after I even hinted at a reddish hue. This immediately AFTER a very friendly post encouraging people to post. Left me thinking 'Why, so you could immediately CAPSLOCKMAFIA them like Mata? Watch carefully. Mataza: + Show Spoiler + Okay, now I'm suspicious. After explaining why I PERSONALLY would remain calm if doubt was cast my direction, Mataza immediately gets defensive and after sprinkling blame on others for their "useless" posts that are "anti-town", requests that we hold off on blaming until after we hear from people. Imagine that. Oh, but at least that doesn't stop him from immediately casting my posts into doubt...almost as soon as he makes said request. I sense a FoS coming that I won't be able to contain. There are my notes. Some of it has been resolved, some of it has not. I don't so much suspect Palmar anymore as his tone seemed much more townie in his posts since. And while I don't like how QUICKLY GiygaS jumped on Mata, his reasoning is at least reasonable (imo) and as such has started to look more green to me. Everyone else' posts just don't scream RED the way Mataza's do. But as I've stated before, I'd vote if I felt sure enough. I'm not. Discuss. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Hopefully my post sheds some light on why it appears that I'm focusing (tunneling?) Mataza. I loathe to call it tunneling though as there isn't much else going on for me to even COMMENT on other than our little dialogue back and forth...but it's true, my only suspicion so far is Mataza. I'm interested to know what is suspicious about my posts ASIDE from my lack of content. Lack of content isn't scummy itself. It has to be accompanied by other outside factors (attempting to derail conversations, intent to confuse fencers to name a couple). | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Lots of discussion now - you getting all this? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I hope this doesn't read as backpedaling, but upon further analysis, I don't have enough faith in my read to really go any further with it. In spite of my misgivings, most everything he's said HAS appeared to be pro-town, except from when he was defending himself from me. I would like clarification of your first post though Mataza. What did you mean by 'I thought about claiming cop'...do you mean you thought about it before you knew your role? You thought about it after you recieved your role? I understand that it's quite a ways back (first post from you), but it would really ease my mind if you could clarify that one statement. On everything else I'll lay off. @stefftastic I'd really like to hear more from you as you have precious few posts and you're one of the remaining people who has yet to really give an opinion on anything. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
By CAPSLOCKMAFIA I was refering to how you appeared to call Mata Mafia at the end of that post, doing so in all caps. Those were my notes from last night, and as I said...some of it was resolved. Actually yours was mostly what I was referencing, as you had made an effort to apologize and had made it clear you were just joking at the time of the post. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
##vote stefftastiq This is based upon comments in pregame about looking forward to playing, and the very few posts after it speaking otherwise. I understand that I can be quoted as being against policy-lynching inactives, but in this case it reads scummy to me and I'd like someone to post...something. All that has been posted so far has been analysis of one FoS and the fluff that comes with it. I'd like to see a few more FoS's, but even that is getting to be too late for today, and I don't think enough of us are active enough to get good solid evidence one way or the other. So here we are. Analyze this. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
The fact of the matter is that Mataza, while appearing guilty at first, had never really done anything OVERTLY anti-town. He suspected me of course, being one of the loudest voices opposing him...but that's only natural right? While I don't consider him "innocent as a newborn baby", I don't consider him guilty either. This is why I retracted my FoS on him and why I decided to instead cast my vote for an inactive to generate discussion. Luckily, yous guys didn't need my help as the discussion was obviously NOT generated by me, but rather by analysis and rationale. Kudos team. Honestly I don't care if that looks scummy or not. It had the desired effect. Now to analyze. Thanks to your diligence, I have lots to go back and read. Expect a full report soon. *salute* | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On May 17 2011 21:48 prplhz wrote: Yo people I see that people have started voting now, around 16 hours before deadline. This is not good people. Unvoting is very suspucious and there is still plenty of time for people to provide material to analyze. Of course some claim to do it for the sake of discussion but I still think that this is very bad. In addition to this I do not think that any of these votes are currently well founded, they are wild accusations at best. First of all, in my opinion, having perfect conviction and unerring foresight are NOT prerequisites to being a good townie. In fact, if people have it in their minds that unvoting is suspicious, they won't vote until someone tells them it's the right thing to do. People should make up their own minds and vote according to what they think is right for the town. And if that changes, that's totally fine. Unvoting isn't suspicious...what's suspicious is the TIMING of unvoting. I also think that it is bad that people have removed focus from Mataza. While he might not be scum this town has him very much under control. He is very active and has agreed to answer every question directed at him. These are very useful qualities for town to find in a player, no matter if he is scum or townie. We should have tried to use these qualities to hunt scum. So wait...is it bad or is it good that people have removed focus? You appear to have nothing against Mataza from this passage, aside from the fact that people aren't focusing on him anymore. I would love to have waited with this post until GiygaS next post but lets just go ahead and do some analysis. I do not think that Mataza is harmful for this town just yet. He is under control so far, I would like him to be more harmful for the Mafia though. So I ask this: @Mataza : With the information available to you now, who would you lynch if you should lynch the player you think is most likely to be Scum? Further evidence that you're okay with Mataza...asking his advice as you feel he has qualities you can use to hunt scum. So I'm going to go ahead and do something that VisceraEyes has done several time. Point fingers at some random person for the sake of discussion. And this random person is going to be VisceraEyes himself. Some reasons (so it's not entirely random who I am pointing fingers at) for this: 1. He was the first person who point fingers at others. While he might have done this for the sake of discussion, I think that mostly scum would do this early on in the game. Townies would consider how the other person might be a townie and how unfounded accusations might harm the town, even if you made it clear that they are unfounded. While this is a game of finger pointing, and we can't all do it simultaneously...being the FIRST to point fingers shouldn't really be a scum-tell...SOMEONE is going to be first, and there's no reason to believe that it will be scum. 2. He is often analyzing his own actions. This is something I think you would (should) mainly do when you are scum. There is nothing to fear as a townie, only thing you have to consider is how the town can benefit the most from your actions. While we would all like to survive this game I think this is done best by being honest and only analytical of the actions of potential scum. I'm not sure what you mean by 'analyzing my own actions', but I've been nothing but honest and forthright with everyone from the beginning. Obviously there's no way to prove that, but I've also given you no reason to doubt me. 3. He has just something I would deem crazy to do if you were a townie. He suddenly said "this guy I have been bashing all game long, maybe he's not scum so I'm just gonna vote for someone and provide very limited rationale for this". This is not only very scum-like in my eyes, it is also harmful to the town. Okay, speaking to this...I had a scummy feeling about Mataza from the beginning, and I FoS'd him. I didn't 'bash' anyone 'all game long'. Not only that, but I shifted my focus OFF of someone you've spent a lot of this post BUILDING UP as someone useful for town. I fail to see how me NO LONGER SUSPECTING someone you feel is trustworthy would indicate scumminess. @VisceraEyes : Do you think that it is beneficial for the town that you suddenly make a 180 in letting Mataza off the hook and go full force against stefftastiq? Off the hook? But...you....you said you....but...Guy, these contradictions are getting palpable. Another player who has struck me as harmful to the town is Palmar. He has recently used some very questionable rhetorics to defend Mataza, and while it might be good that Mataza is not lynched, questionable rhetorics are always harmful to town. But on the other hand he also appears to be a very strong player who the town can make good use of later on, so maybe it is just a question of getting him under control ![]() @Palmar : Why do you think Mataza is "innocent as a newborn baby"? Gutfeeling is not an acceptable answer ![]() Think that was it for now. I will try to vote around 4 hours before deadline. Finals notes on what I think all townies should currently be aware of: Lurking townies make it possible for scum to play lurker style too. I think everybody should get up and post some analysis, if you are a townie this is absolutely the best thing you can do. We still missing a couple of you but this is making the game very much harder for town! I would consider any of the prospective modkills (Skrammen, Wunder) showing up in the nick of time to cast crucial votes for the lynching VERY suspicious. Even if they decide to show up now I think they will be very harmful to town if they don't post a lot in a very short amount of time. It is very good to have people under control; the more they post the more we can ask questions and the more we can make ourselves sure that someone is scum/townie. We will probably have two modkills but maybe it will be beneficial to town to lynch one of the least active players, to set an example, to make the game more fun, to maybe hit a lurking scum! Oh yeah and GiygaS; my nick is "purple haze" without any vowels or spaces ![]() You talk a lot about being "In Control" of people...you don't control anyone my friend. And neither does the town. It is for this attitude and the thoughts posted in the quote above that I now FoS: prplhz | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Also, you say that you're going to vote for an inactive this lynch, yet you're suspicious of me for doing that very thing...for that very reason. I'm so confused it's ridiculous, and inciting confusion is something scummy people LOVE to do. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
No, I pointed out several inconsistencies in that post that I'd like you to answer. First of all, you called me out for 'pulling a 180' regarding Mata and voted for stefftastiq, an inactive non-poster who isn't helping town. And then what do you do? You cast your vote for an inactive non-poster who isn't helping town. Not only that, you find the fact that I no longer find Mata suspicious. But nearly 40% of that post was talking about how you...no longer find Mata suspicious. I guess you have no comment on these very clear cases of contradiction? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Also I find it interesting that the reason you gave for not commenting on things I said was that I just didn't agree with you. Yet the majority of the things I said were places where I point out where you AGREE with me...and you're most suspicious of me. As Mata said...Maf is most likely active and outspoken. I'm not wasting time on inactives. ##vote prplhz | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Unless 2 Maf are already voting for Skrammen. >.> <.< | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'm pretty sure prplhz can speak for himself...unless he just doesn't need to cause you're on the same informed team. ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
prplhz GiygaS Palmar I especially like the part where Palmar doesn't think anything I say is worth mentioning. This is my vote order people. Today I vote prplhz, tomorrow I vote Palmar, the following day I vote GiygaS. I will be doing no more analysis and I'll be skirting being mod-killed until I'm either lynched or murdered, just so there's another green inactive that they can coerce you all to lynch. gg Maf. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
[red]GiygaS prplhz Palmar[/r] Today is GiygaS, tomorrow is prplhz and d3 is Palmar. ##unvote prplhz ##Vote GiygaS | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
When all I hear is how none of my posts contain anything and basically everything I say can be ignored, I tend to clam up. If you're on board with me, vote GiygaS and see how he flips. Otherwise, it doesn't matter what you say. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
My list holds. They won't vote together if they think they can block it without doing so. That would look suspicious. If they think that they can block a good vote with just 2, they will. The fact that Karshe isn't sure of me is good...it means he's using his brain. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Keep in mind that Palmar is ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN of GiygaS and prplhz' innocence. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I had no desire to change my vote until your 11th hour scum-switch. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Enjoying the show? ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On May 18 2011 12:26 Palmar wrote: Alright, turns out he was indeed a terrible mafia! This definitely isn't a bad start. I still worry about the amount of information we have, but I guess that can be remedied in the coming days. First thing to do is try not to overthink the situation. There is a chance the mafia might have voted for Giyg as soon as they saw him as a potential target, but the obvious and much more accessible solution is to approach the problem from the point of view that mafia didn't vote for mafia. So unless any major clues get revealed, the first thing to do is to analyse and understand everyone that got on the wrong side of the vote, and try to find out who was genuinely wrong and who had malicious intent. Karshe Hiro Protagonist Wunder Nard Palmar It's more than likely that both the remaining mafia can be found in this list. I will break down everyone's posts in this list, except of course myself, that's a job for someone else, and provide analysis in the coming day. Here's my problem with your approach here Palmar. Everyone on that list voted for Skrammen for one reason: Because he's inactive and you (among others) were gunning hard for inactives the ENTIRE GAME. I don't even have to analyze your posts...they all say the same thing. "Inactives are a threat to this town, we must get rid of them first." What I find interesting is that after spending all game saying this, the very first post you make after we find some scum is "Forget inactives...let's start looking for scum now!" As Mataza pointed out, 2 of the 4 most inactive players voted rightly for who they thought was scum. The other 2 bandwaggoned on someone more inactive than they are. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
At the time, you were top of my list for people who are red. Mainly because you were targeting me and I suck. At any rate, one of the things I said to you earlier was "Unvoting is NOT suspicious...timing of unvoting IS suspicious." You have to admit....pulling a 9:59 switch totally betraying the people who were voting for the inactive....it looks pretty scummy. I had no desire to switch my vote until you did this. I dont' know who I would've switched to, but I know that I didn't want my vote to lie with yours, scum in my eyes. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
[sarcasm]Yeah, I agree...someone who had GiygaS on his official, posted scum-list should have MOST of your suspicion.[/sarcasm] Unless we have a doc, I postulate that Mafia intend to murder Mataza and discredit me to try and get me lynched d2. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
It's reasonable to assume that my reaction was noob scum-tell. Allow me to explain my thought-process behind what I said. At the time of your switch, I was in a bad place in the game. I'd been trying to analyze all day, tried posting my thoughts on various people, anything I could to try and help hunt scum. You had posted something which I thought was suspicious, so I analyzed the post. I had clearly asked you to clarify a few inconsistencies in the post, but you just waved them away refusing to answer them. Claiming that I was saying something I wasn't. Add to that Palmar's assertion that everything I was doing was useless, and you could see my frustration. Now, on to the post in question. Your switch made me imagine two likely scenarios. First, that you were scum and at the last minute you switched your vote knowing that as it was so close, you knew you were hitting GigyaS. Otherwise, you were scum, and you were hitting GigyaS in an attempt to clear you of suspicion when GigyaS flipped red. I decided before I posted that the most likely scenario was the second and left my vote unchanged...as you'll note, I DID post before voting was closed after you switched. I had ample time to switch my vote. So what you're saying is that I not only outted myself as scum by commenting on your switch, but that I in my noobiness forgot to unvote and save my scummy friend. Is that correct? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Revisiting my scumlist we see that I had prplhz, Palmar and GiygaS. For this example, I'm going to assume you're all three mafia. At any rate, before your switch, we see that you and GiygaS were both voting for Skrammen. Not only does this effectively block the vote for GiygaS, but it allows Palmar to Off-vote (vote for someone NO ONE ELSE is voting for..very scummy behavior at the end of the day) to ensure that even if in the event someone switches last minute, he could swoop in and recast his vote for Skrammen. Good. Great. But then we take into account the fact that A) GiygaS is highly under suspicion of the most active (and most accurate so far) scumhunter, Mataza and B) He's playing bad scum and C) Mafia can converse with each other, it isn't far-fetched to believe that a last-minute switch from inactive Skrammen to obvScum GiygaS would not only clear your name ("See? I voted for scum too!", but pave the way for Palmar to then go on a witch-hunt of those who voted against GiygaS lynch. "But VE, why wouldn't Palmar just vote for GiygaS himself?" you might be asking...well, if you'll read the rules, the person with the most votes first is the target in the event of a tie...which would've resulted in Skrammen getting lynched anyway. BOOM HEADSHOT. GG Maf. Fire away...I don't even NEED to post anymore! ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() I'm just messin with you. Towns victory is assured, so it doesn't matter at this point. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Thx for clarification. @prplhz What that doesn't change is that I thought they did. But obviously, that's unprovable, so I'll stop wasting time debating it. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Why vote for someone no one else in town was voting for? Why not help get rid of the inactive everyone decided was the best target? If not him, why not vote on the obvScum everyone else decided was the best target? Why alone in your vote? That's very suspicious my friend. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
He's okay...he's just acting aloof and dismissive...that's NOT an uncommon strategy for Mafia. Like, no amount of analysis is even WORTHY of him noting. In spite of saying you were very helpful to town d1, did he actually mention AGREEING with anything you posted? Did he even quote you ONCE? Or analyze you? He's bandwagoning your INNOCENCE rather than someone else's scumminess. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I don't mean to imply that I thought GiygaS was obviously scum...I wasn't absolutely certain of him. I used the term obvScum to indicate that he was highly under suspicion and anyone who wanted to could've easily jumped on the GiygaS Bandwagon of Death. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
....at the time. It wasn't a bandwagon until the end. As you pointed out...you were pushing GiygaS alone for a while. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Yes, you're right. I made a mistake in that post. It should have read '...is absolutely certain of prplhz' innocence'...because that you were sure of...you made a big post about it http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=222568¤tpage=9#175 Sorry about that, I was emotional at the time and didn't check my facts. I'm still wary, but as I trust Mataza's read more than I suspect you IN PARTICULAR (I'm not done on prplhz, regardless of what Mata says lol), I'm dropping you off my Scum-list, to replace you with Karshe. prplhz, Karshe Thank you, that is all. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
You're not alone dude...I'm sure everyone but Maf will be surprised if one of us doesn't bite it tonight. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=222568¤tpage=14#261 ...and take a good long look. Mataza is one of the strongest players in the game and if he's not hit that means that I'm closer in my estimation than he is. I DOUBT it considering...but don't discount me because of my erratic methodology. Discount me if you think my theories don't hold water. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
"At first i thought I would claim cop openly"....what did you mean by this? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
This is a question that everybody should ask themselves. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Karshe died a terrible death at the hands of some crafty fellows. First, here is every post (save a few fluff posts that literally had no content...if someone calls me out for "Is there a seperate voting thread?" or something equally irrelevant I'm going to be very angry) that Karshe made in the game up until he cast his vote for Skrammen d1. Posts are in spoilers, summaries under spoilers. + Show Spoiler + On May 17 2011 00:56 Karshe wrote: Good morning all. First post here, I have caught up with the thread. As others have said, there's no real reason to suspect Mataza yet. The majority of us are fairly new to the game, and Mataza making the first "quality" post shouldn't be considered suspicious. The only thing to watch for is scum posting general tips/math to gain town cred while not actually helping our hunt. And yes, I realize I could qualify under that last statement. =P Looking forward to scum hunting with you all. Hopefully we'll get lots of posts today and get to know everyone. Very reasonable. + Show Spoiler + On May 17 2011 01:53 Karshe wrote: Inactives are a mixed bag for me. I agree that lynching them isn't the wisest choice because there's a low chance they are mafia... but inactives also irritate me to no end. I understand that RL > TL and things come up, but why join the game if you're not going to play? It just ruins the spirit of the game for me and I have low tolerence/patience for inactives. That said, hopefully we're discussing this for no reason and we'll hear from everyone today. ![]() I like this guy already...and I already miss him. + Show Spoiler + On May 17 2011 13:37 Karshe wrote: I am most definitely not getting mod killed, thank you. Just had a busy monday, and when I was on earlier, there weren't too many quality posts yet. I've got caught up, and here are my thoughts. I am most suspicious of Mataza right now. I wouldn't go as far to vote him, yet, but I have my reservations. Since this is openly a noobie game, this was my first thought going into the game: Show nested quote + On May 17 2011 00:56 Karshe wrote: The only thing to watch for is scum posting general tips/math to gain town cred while not actually helping our hunt. And yes, I realize I could qualify under that last statement. =P and this was one of Mataza's first posts: Show nested quote + On May 16 2011 12:16 Mataza wrote: Small math problem. 12 day1 ly nk 10 day2 ly nk 8 day 3 ly nk 6 day4 So scum is forced to lay really low, if they ever want to stand a chance. To newer players to the game--myself somewhat included--this sounds like a foreign language and some may think, "Man, he knows what he's talking about... I better listen to what this guy has to say." I propose that was Mataza's intention for posting the math so early on. Show nested quote + On May 17 2011 02:49 Mataza wrote: I am curious what these various questions. So far I only gathered one: "Tell us why you´re/you´re not mafia!" I very well might be mafia, as everyone of you might be mafia too. But I can´t go ahead and tell you my plans before half the people posted, because then these plans wouldn´t work.(Since mafia would know what to do or what not to do.) About the inactives: Dependant on the number of inactives, it´s not a bad idea to lynch them. Low activity means they aren´t really helping the town and therefore it´s not a big loss. We wouldn´t lose any amount of discussion. But we can´t do that right now, because a) the day isn´t nearly over and b) there are too many. But people who do not post/do no vote are modkilled at the end of the cycle. One of Mataza's next longer posts, which can be summarized to rephrasing things that have already been said I would argue that even for a noobie game, a lot of this is stating common sense. Yes, we know you could be mafia. That's how the game works. I feel this is another example of gaining town cred while not actually contributing. It looks as though my main argument was also noticed by Giygas (to give credit where credit is due): Show nested quote + On May 16 2011 15:52 GiygaS wrote: Mhm, and you've also mentioned the Mafia's purported strategy, which is to stay under the radar. Something you haven't done. If you wanted someone to go off the path of finding the mafia, you would say that the strategy they would perform would be completely opposite to what you were doing. Also, you were the first one to make basic rules to know HE IS THE MAFIA. I believe that Mataza attempted to put an early notion into newer players heads that mafia will attempt to lay as low as possible, while he himself is a mafia and one of the most active posters. My initial gut feeling thus far is that Giygas is town. I feel as though he has done a great job at generating discussion without having done anything I can point out as shady. I haven't made a decision on VisceraEyes yet, for now he is an active poster and I would personally rather lynch an inactive compared to a helpful/active poster on Day 1, if that's what it comes down to. Sorry to wrap this up short but I haven't eaten dinner yet. I will check in before bed for updates. First actual content post. Mostly suspicious of Mataza. Misread on GiygaS. Still not sure on VisceraEyes. + Show Spoiler + On May 18 2011 01:14 Karshe wrote: I see no reason we should worrying about the game set up on Day 1, since we have no way of knowing what game type we're playing. I, too, questioned Mataza's early cop claim, but was hesitant to bring light to it. I'm not sure I buy your reasoning, and there's always LAL (lynch all liars). I'm not convinced you're mafia yet, but I'll be keeping an eye on your posts. Taking a look at others, I am growing increasingly suspicious of Palmar. Show nested quote + On May 17 2011 00:54 Palmar wrote: I'm more worried about the quiet people, it's only been 13 hours or so, but we're still missing half the town in the action. If people don't post people don't make mistakes. So please type in a few sentences so we know you're alive Getting easy town cred while not really contributing and just saying, "where is everyone?" Show nested quote + On May 17 2011 02:50 Palmar wrote: Why would it take effort to create a first post? Even if you say something completely retarded it's fine as long as you have nothing to hide. Barring revealing a blue power role, anything you say in your first post will just be that... a simple first post. Not contributing. Then, his most eye raising act, he then takes it upon himself to defend Mataza, the town's biggest point of discussion, while pointing a completely random finger away from Mataza. And I mean, he really defends Mataza. My only concern is if both Mataza and Palmar were scum, Palmar wouldn't be defending Mataza so blantantly (and oddly). I'll be keeping an eye on your posts as well. To finish with: I am still not sold on Gigyas being scum, but it may be at this point that I'm just taking Mataza's posts with a grain of salt. I will re-read Gigyas' posts in a bit with an open mind. Suspicious of Palmar, restatement of suspicion of Mataza + Show Spoiler + On May 18 2011 01:21 Karshe wrote: Also, I wanted to say, Show nested quote + On May 17 2011 22:04 Palmar wrote: @purplehaze... you're an idiot, but you're not scum, or at least you're not an obvious scum. There's no need for that. This a openly a noobie game, many of us are still learning the ropes... there's no need for name calling. All it will do is discourage further posting and create a negative atmosphere. We're all here to have fun lynching mafia, right? What a stand-up guy... + Show Spoiler + On May 18 2011 03:27 Karshe wrote: Hi Skrammen, We're glad you were able to make it, but we need you to post more information. If you're thinking you will not be able to play as a result of real life, you can request a replacement. Otherwise, we will need you to post more analysis and not just bandwagon... or you risk being lynched as a result of being a non-helpful townie. ![]() Warning to Skrammen. + Show Spoiler + On May 18 2011 05:18 Karshe wrote: Not enough discussion today, getting worried. To reiterate what Palmar has said, Show nested quote + On May 18 2011 02:23 Palmar wrote: But I'd rather have to filter through tons of bad information injected by mafia, than having no information at all and just playing a guessing game. and my own stance on Day 1: Show nested quote + On May 17 2011 01:53 Karshe wrote: Inactives are a mixed bag for me. I agree that lynching them isn't the wisest choice because there's a low chance they are mafia... but inactives also irritate me to no end. I understand that RL > TL and things come up, but why join the game if you're not going to play? It just ruins the spirit of the game for me and I have low tolerence/patience for inactives. I have a low tolerance for inactive players. I am still very suspicious of Mataza, but I would much rather have him in the game and posting consistantly compared to someone who posts once in this thread and once in the vote thread. Lynching an inactive poster may not give us very much information on Day 2, but I believe it will help us in the long run because we will have more information to dissect from active players in future days. So, my intetion is to vote for an inactive as we get closer to night time. I'm allowing more time for those inactive to post some analysis, or request a replacement. Keepin it real. No surprises. + Show Spoiler + On May 18 2011 07:22 Karshe wrote: As for my vote, I still intend to vote for an inactive for reasons I've already stated, but I wanted to give as much time as possible to allow for them to speak up. I feel like we've got some scum lurking and waiting to put in a last minute vote to bandwagon whoever the town has decided on. More statement of intent to lynch inactives. + Show Spoiler + On May 18 2011 08:21 Karshe wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2011 07:41 Mataza wrote: Karshe may have jumped on the bandwagon so late that it passes by unnoticed, but he said he sounded sure Giygas is town and I am mafia. After he noticed the bandwagon was dead, he instantly dropped suspicion on me and now wants to lynch inactives. By now I am pretty sure that no mafia is inactive, but instead very outspoken. I haven't bandwagon'd anyone, including you. I still have suspicions that you are mafia, I have not dropped anything at all. However, what I have said is: Show nested quote + On May 18 2011 05:18 Karshe wrote: I have a low tolerance for inactive players. I am still very suspicious of Mataza, but I would much rather have him in the game and posting consistantly compared to someone who posts once in this thread and once in the vote thread. Lynching an inactive poster may not give us very much information on Day 2, but I believe it will help us in the long run because we will have more information to dissect from active players in future days. I would rather vote an inactive who isn't contributing anything to the fun/game at all, rather than someone (you) who I believe to be shady but at least is actively participating. I have already stated why: we may have less information on Day 2, but more information in the future. To answer purplehaze's question from earlier, if I had to pick a Day 2 lynch right now, it would be Mataza. I feel like you're trying to derail every lynch attempt, and you yourself have said: Show nested quote + On May 18 2011 02:01 Mataza wrote: Common sense: Active mafia will try to disrupt town conversation. I still question your motives as well. So far you have been quoted as saying "Mafia will try to lurk!" while being the most active poster, and now you're saying, "Mafia are bandwagoning! By the way, I have never bandwagoned!" *wink wink nudge nudge* I am about to leave for work, I will vote for an inactive in 30 minutes when I get home if they have not posted yet. Defending his decision to Mataza, reinforcing his suspicion in the process. At this point I'm surprised he never FoS'd Mataza. + Show Spoiler + On May 18 2011 09:05 Karshe wrote: As I have been indicating all day: voting Skrammen, who has been inactive for the majority of the game except for a single bandwagon post which helped nothing. ##Vote: Skrammen The inactive he ultimately chose. It doesn't take but a quick glance to notice a theme. Obviously he was targeted by the mafia for being to harsh on inactives! Wait.....no............ He was suspicious of Mataza the entire day! He never let up on him, not even after I released my FoS from him. Also was suspicious of Palmar, but only posts once so I can't speak to the intensity of his suspicion. ....to be continued... | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Mataza has possibly the strongest stance in the town. He single-handedly (with the help of some votes from his friends) rid the town of the awful scum GiygaS. He's one of the most active posters in the game. He has a fanclub whose president is Palmar. I have one of the weakest. I broke under pressure. I've been making horrible reads and outrageous accusations throughout d and n 1. My only ally against my main opponent at the beginning of d1 was GiygaS. I......touch myself at night. Now...hang with me here. Mafia chose to kill Karshe. They CHOSE him. They weren't limited by doubt. It's true, there could still be a doctor or cop or both in this game. But between Mataza and myself, doctor was preoccupied. So they eliminated the next biggest threat. Not prplhz who was suspicious of me. Not Palmar who was suspicious of DeepBlu2. Certainly not stefftastiq, the inactive. They chose Karshe. Why? Because at the end of the day, he was the only one left standing against Mataza. This might come as a shock to many of you, and I can assure you, Karshe dying came as a shock to me. But I suspect that Mataza is playing us all like a freaking drum. I think it's been part of his plan all along to position himself into a leadership role by sacrificing one of his own so he can, unfettered, pick us off during the day as well as night. FoS: Mataza My next guess is that either Mataza or his scum buddy will claim cop. Be VERY wary of this. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Oh, in my excitement, I forgot one thing. I retract my FoS: prplhz. The more I read Karshe's posts, the more of prplhz I got to read too. While his switch WAS suspicious, his reasoning for it appeared to be logical and sincere. I assume he still suspects me and I'll have some 'splaining to do later on...but I no longer suspect him. Just thought I'd correct you there. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
What I found was the obvious. My initial reaction. While I can't in good conscience retract my FoS: Mataza[red] due to the striking evidence I uncovered...I'm forced to reopen my original scumlist and FoS: prplhz and Palmar. From my perspective, either Palmar and Mataza as my latest theory posits are working together or [red]Palmar and prplhz are working together as my previous theory posits. Because it's impossible yet to determine which is the case, there is a common element which is clear at this moment. ##Vote Palmar I'd like to hear from Mataza and hear what he has to say. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I have nothing more to go on, so I'm not tunneling. I'm working with what I have. Which is considerable. If you want to get really technical, my main problem with prplhz was A) He tried to discredit me saying I pulled a 180 where Mataza was concerned, stopped focusing on him and voted for an inactive. In the VERY SAME POST he proclaimed that he himself was no longer suspicious of Mataza and that he would, in all likelihood, cast his vote for an inactive. Not only that, but that post was very VERY vague on where he stood where Mataza was concerned...he said that it was bad that people stopped focusing on him, but then in the same breath said that he was no longer suspicious of him. When I tried to call him out on it, that's when you did your little drama about the PRs and how uncareful he is and how useless I am. B) He scum-switched at 9:59. I don't care that he did it and ultimately landed on a scum. The point is he, along with 5 others, decided together that the best lynch for the night was inactive Skarrem...and at 9:59 he betrayed those he sided with and chose to lynch GiygaS, an active player. C) General scumminess. This is less prominent and is ultimately subjective, so I won't try and explain that...it's in the eye of the beholder obviously. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
FoS means you suspect someone, and you're showing the whole town. You're flying your finger flippantly forward with frenetic fervor. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Witch hunt, huh? Back with the dismissive defense then. That's cool. Your inconsistent behavior and attempts to derail the town's search for scum are duly noted and will be reflected on your PERMANENT record. Whilst you're plotting your next device to discredit or dismiss me, I'll be actively searching for your cohort. @Town All you need to do is go back through Palmar's posts leading up to the vote d1, note his attitude toward me when he doesn't consider me a threat. He barely even mentions me, other than to say that my posts are useless, straw houses that could be blown over with an inkling of analysis. Next note his tone after my analysis. He makes sure to note that it's my best post yet, but then tells me why it's utterly wrong. It may be a stretch to ask for your trust at this point, but if you feel as I do, that Palmar's behavior is suspicious at best, destructive at worst, then I urge you to go back and take a look at his posts. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
You've said often that you want to THREATEN to lynch inactives...yet your actions speak otherwise. It's easy to promise something. However, as we saw on d1, everyone ended up posting and everyone ended up voting. And you still voted for an inactive. Not only that, but an inactive that no one else in town was targeting. So you not only failed to deliver on your promise, but you admittedly INTENTIONALLY voted against the rest of town. Your reason? "I was okay with either one of them dying." "But everyone's post was useless and I wanted ANALYSIS...I failed to deliver because the conditions were not met" It seems to me that everyone's posts are useless in your eyes. Everyone, that is, except people that agree with you. So what you really MEANT by that promise was "I'll switch my vote when I'm satisfied that everyone is posting to my exacting specifications of activity"...or in other words, "I'll switch my vote when I'm damned good and ready".......or never as your actions have indicated. My guess is that you never REALLY intended to switch your vote, unless something ruined your plan. But that's just speculation. Your move sir. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Heh...Hiro Protagonist. Of the inactives, this guy has appeared to me to be the most rational and analytical. It stands to reason that he would be your vote. His point regarding Skrammen IS valid you know...Skrammen DID bandwagon-vote for GiygaS...and he was UTTERLY absent until an hour before voting was closed. Let me guess - not getting any scummy reads from this guy I suppose, right? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
It's pretty apparent that you're now grasping at straws to save yourself, so I won't waste time trying to convince you of why you're coming off as very VERY guilty to me anymore. I'll focus instead on trying to find your accomplice. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
What do you think about the rash murder of Karshe? Any ideas about who might be behind it? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Judging from your highly hostile response to my accusation, it would appear that I've struck a nerve. Stay tuned... | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Report coming soon. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
There's one easy way to settle this. Join me in trying to get Palmar lynched tonight. You mentioned you were suspicious of him. Well, I'm 100% on this guy. I'm asking you to trust me as I trusted you in lynching GiygaS. We did a great thing d1. We can do it again if you'll just trust me. To use your initial logic, we still have available to us 3 mislynches. If I'm wrong, I'll gladly take the second mislynch as you'll then have AMPLE information to clear the rest of the Maf. This is a favor, and I'm asking you, PLEADING with you to join me in this. And before you use this to reason against doing it, refusing won't make me auto-FoS you or anything. No strings attached. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On May 16 2011 18:49 nard wrote: hio everyone, obligatory 1st post here. @current discussion: Mataza seems to be more experienced than the average newcomers here so i don't suspect him just because he made the first posts with some actual content today.. i rather find it interesting that VisceraEyes is jumping to conclusions / trying to badmouth someone that quick. :p im really curious how were gonna settle for our 1st lynch given that no special roles are in the game! ![]() Early game, when I'm eyeballing Mataza and GiygaS has bandwagoned. Rightly notices that this isn't Mataza's first rodeo and smartly dodges giving a real comment other than 'Someone's pointing a finger...maybe someone should point one at them.' Also prematurely assumes that there are no power-roles in the game...unless he's trying to deceive new players, which I find highly unlikely. On May 17 2011 02:25 nard wrote: dont forget we have an 48hour day cycle, so there is still plenty of time for everybody to post. i can imagine there are still some people thinking about what they could include in their first post which is not completely trivial - took me a while as well :p This generated a few strange responses. A few people jumped on him about this post, claiming 'It shouldn't be hard...just write something'...also one or two 'Maybe it's cause he's trying to think of something non-scummy to say!' All in all, I think he might just be new and not sure what a good way to lead into a game like this would be. In my opinion, totally reasonable. On May 17 2011 10:35 nard wrote: nice to see a 2nd poster with a lot of content besides mataza - thanks prplhz ![]() onto your note: Show nested quote + While this might be a whole new game for everybody it should not be hard for an innocent townie to write a simple "hello" post. Maybe nard is having a hard time writing his first post because he is a scum with a hidden agenda and then he is thinking that everybody else is having a hard time too? This is a question that everybody should ask themselves. i realized when i made that post that it in itself is suspicious as well and thats kinda supporting the argument i posted - everything you post except a trivial "hello" might be endangering your life and i guess most if not all townies want not only the town to win, but also to survive until the end. as requested here are my opinions on the 3 most active posters. this is no deep analysis just some gut feelings after having read the last 2 thread pages. i might post a reasoning with quotes and all that jazz in a few hours when i have a break. Mataza - before prplhz posted his argument about him trying to set up a leadership he was pretty unsuspicious to me. currently undeciced, still tending to townie though. Viscera - so far the most suspicious. locking in on only Mataza, a lot of posts with lacking content. Giygas - less suspicious then Viscera. kind of in an odd place to make a decision as his posts are way less agressive / suspicious than viscera, but they keep appearing as a double tag team which makes it harder to form a seperate opinion on both. hoping for the 2 inactives to show up soon :> Admits to himself that his post might have been suspicious, explains his rationale. Also gives opinions of the 3 most active posters up to this point, myself Mataza and GiygaS. On May 18 2011 10:08 nard wrote: oh my, waking up and checking mafia thread as the 1st thing was a good choice :D by skimming the last 4 new pages quick i find hiro's lynch logic the most appelling. as im lacking a big analysis right now, ill jump the bandwagon for the inactives - skrammen slightly more suspicious as after his 1st post there will still 8 hours to go and he didnt post again, even after being asked to. ##vote Skrammen modkill avoided, suspicion raised - see you on day2 :3 Okay, this is where it starts getting iffy with me. Not only does he ADMITTEDLY jump on a bandwagon, but he admittedly does it following someone else' logic. Add to this the fact that he waits almost a page and a half before even POSTING, barely escaping (or smartly dodging?) FoS's and ##Votes flying around during that time. All the while pointing out someone else's suspicious behavior. Interesting. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I think he said "I almost had you" which in itself was peculiar because he clearly wasn't a mastermind of any kind of plan. ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I repeat, prplhz did NOT CLAIM DOC. Stop telling people to claim roles...this is getting out of hand. lol | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
*weep* | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
It's also worth noting that for the first day's lynch, Palmar voted against the town's wishes. He's been claiming that he doesn't want to lynch inactives, but he still cast his vote for an inactive d1 and didn't change it to the scum OR to the inactive everyone else chose to vote for. Obviously if he'd voted for the inactive we might not have caught the scum, but I think that's less a result of calculated intent by Palmar and more a happy side-effect of prplhz switching his vote last minute. Mataza is going to vote for prplhz regardless of what anyone says, but I think the very best lynch for today is going to be Palmar as he's PROVEN that he's unwilling to bend for the good of the town. This way we can get a cop-read on prplhz (if one exists...) and go into d3 with as much information as possible. @Town A vote for Palmar is a vote for town victory. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
My view is that he's supremely confident in his ability to lead this town...it's just that I, like others, have a problem with his most recent methodology. What I found after rereading his posts is that he's been acting like this the whole game, as he states. He never faltered in his suspicion of GiygaS once he'd set his sights. As GiygaS fate was decided last minute, I don't suspect Mataza played a part in that last-minute decision. HOWEVER - I don't appreciate how he's taking the stance that he's the only one who decides peoples fate in this town. Further, I believe that if we filp you, we'll have more information on prplhz. This is the reason I'm not voting with Mataza in spite of my belief that he is, in fact, Town. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
What do YOU think we should do if you are lynched and you flip green? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I mean @prplhz | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
May I suggest Palmar since you think he's suspicious enough to warrant a cop checking him... | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote Mataza This is about voting with the town as I believe solidarity is important in the days ahead. I'm certain that either myself or Palmar (the most active of the remaining players left) will die in the night. This is going to put the town in a VERY VERY precarious situation if Mataza flips green. I really hope you inactives know what you're doing. Mataza did. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I think they're more saying that the 2 remaining maf will be in that group of 3...but whatever. GG Mataza - I'm sure I'll be seeing you around in other games. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'd like to publicly apologize for absolutely ensuring Mataza's demise today. To speak to Blu's comment, all I can say is that I voted with the majority because town have to stick together. WE decided to lynch Mataza and now we have to move on. Before I post my final thoughts, I'd like to urge EVERYONE to go back and analyze the last few cycles. Town now HAS to get results or Mafia wins. Disregard ALL suspicion you have and read everything over objectively. There's enough information contained in the posts (or lack of posts) to identify the remaining scum. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
All is not lost guys, stop acting like this is over since Mataza is gone. Just go back and read. Read twice or 3 times. Take the guy you suspect the least and make a huge post dissecting THEIR posts. For my part, I'll be posting my final thoughts in a bit...I'm going to a Rapture Party tonight, so I won't find out that I'm dead until tomorrow morning. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
This could save my life as Mafia might try and hunt those guys rather than kill me. Several hundred of my hairs are crossed, so I'll keep my fingers poised to type instead of crossing them. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
He didn't care about dying, he wanted to win. He thought taking prplhz down was important to him. Important enough to say things that ultimately got him lynched. Please consider this during the vote tomorrow. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Thank you, that is all. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On May 17 2011 12:30 GiygaS wrote: Finally, more then 3 people talking! Welcome to the game prp and nard, nice to see some europeans now. Inactives: 2 Guys we haven't seen, may get modkilled. Can't make an opinion on them yet. Karshe: + Show Spoiler + Hasen't really posted anything good at all. Might get modkilled, I don't know about him. stefftastiq: + Show Spoiler + Hasen't posted much but a brief "hello". Mentionned something about people being trigger-happy. I'm a tad suspicious as he should have posted again by now. Deepblu2 + Show Spoiler + On May 17 2011 05:41 DeepBlu2 wrote: I am here. This is off to a good start. I am active..Not sure who I think atm. On May 17 2011 11:57 DeepBlu2 wrote: I'm leaning towards Mataza at the moment. I'm not positive yet but just the fact he's defending himself so aggressively and has been caught with a couple of contradictions while blaming others as well. I'm going to be keep looking at his posts but he's my only suspect currently. I'm not saying it's definitely Mataza just the way he's handling himself is very defensive. Deepblu just posted so I haven't really had a chance to analyse his most recent post, but I'll give it a shot. His first post detailed how he's indeed "active" and he's formulating an opinion. Initially a bit scummy, if he hadn't posted anything, but he has now, so that lowers a bit of his suspicion. Based on his recent entry, he's leaning towards Mataza, based on his defensive stance. Overall, hasen't really produced much content, so I can't really say much about him. More active people: Mataza + Show Spoiler + Now, this guy seems a bit scummy to me, PROBABLY the most so far. The reasons have been brought up already: - He's implying he wants to become A leader of the town (maybe so he can control people? I don't know) - He is very defensive about his spot, very resilient to abandon anything. I don't know if this means he's mafia, but a person who goes out his way to say he's innocent seems a bit guilty :/ - Mentioned how many days Mafia has to stay alive. Good just be some helpful math. - HOWEVER after all this, he said he puts himself officially on trial. And he will only answer questions specifically asked at him. This implies he knows he has done wrong and wants to get a bit out of the spotlight. This is most likely because he's tired of constantly defending himself, but it could also be that he's Mafia and wants to sink back in to the shadows. I'm a bit suspicious of him. Also, he's got my name wrong twice now (it's not gigays, or gigas, it's giygas ![]() VisceraEyes: + Show Spoiler + Got into Mataza as soon as the game begun, might just because he wants activity. The fact he HAS been avoiding questions to attack Mataza some more, which may imply he's trying to avoid them so that he doesn't have any answers. Don't know what I think of him, a bit suspicious. prplhz (anyone got tricks for this guy's name? ![]() + Show Spoiler + Seems very rational to me. Got some more discussion other then the back and forth between me, Mataza and VisceraEyes. Seems very pro-town to me, but once again, your best friends can sometimes be your worst enemies. I'm not very suspicious of him. nard + Show Spoiler + Kind of interesting. This guy has posted three times. Once to remind us all that it's too early to start making conclusions about Mataza, one that reminds us all that we have 48 hours before we have to make a decision and to take some time, and finally one that answers some suspicions on his first post, and saying he's not too suspicious of Mataza, and suspicous of me and Viscera (more Viscera). I don't know what this means, but IF we find out that Mataza is indeed a Mafia, I believe this guy is probably a cohort based on his behind-the-scenes support for the guy. I'm a bit suspicious of him. Palmar: + Show Spoiler + Has mostly mentioned inactives and getting some debate going on that topic. He may just be curious. That said, he was the first one to mention and notice Nard's post on being saying it was difficult to post the first time. Hasen't really added a lot of real content, but I believe he's pro-town. Only the minutest amount of suspicion. hiro protagonist + Show Spoiler + On May 17 2011 02:58 hiro protagonist wrote: Its true that lurking round is a good place for scum to hide, as there is little evidence to indict them. how ever all but 3 of us have posted and I doubt that ALL of the inactives will be scum... best bet is a scum has already posted, so we should try to sniff em out! If we don't have a good lead by tomorrow, then we should ask the lurkers to step up and explain themselves... That's his only post. Unfortunately, we don't get any background info on what country he lives in, so we can't analyse when he'll post. Unfortunate :/ The fact that he did add SOMETHING (scum have probably posted) shows he MIGHT be pro-town in his behavior. Don't know what to think on him due to inactivity. EDIT: Okay, he just posted another one that added a bit more content, so I moved him down here. Basically listing his suspicions. Seem's a bit more mafia now to be honest based on his bandwagonning to everyone else, but he may just agree with some people. EDIT: Yes, this is my first time EVER playing mafia, so this is a new experience for me. i'm gonna be interested to see if anything else develops. This is GiygaS first real content post. Please note that the only two people he doesn't really suspect are Palmar and prplhz. + Show Spoiler + On May 19 2011 02:43 Palmar wrote: Show nested quote + On May 19 2011 01:24 VisceraEyes wrote: On May 18 2011 12:26 Palmar wrote: Alright, turns out he was indeed a terrible mafia! This definitely isn't a bad start. I still worry about the amount of information we have, but I guess that can be remedied in the coming days. First thing to do is try not to overthink the situation. There is a chance the mafia might have voted for Giyg as soon as they saw him as a potential target, but the obvious and much more accessible solution is to approach the problem from the point of view that mafia didn't vote for mafia. So unless any major clues get revealed, the first thing to do is to analyse and understand everyone that got on the wrong side of the vote, and try to find out who was genuinely wrong and who had malicious intent. Karshe Hiro Protagonist Wunder Nard Palmar It's more than likely that both the remaining mafia can be found in this list. I will break down everyone's posts in this list, except of course myself, that's a job for someone else, and provide analysis in the coming day. Here's my problem with your approach here Palmar. Everyone on that list voted for Skrammen for one reason: Because he's inactive and you (among others) were gunning hard for inactives the ENTIRE GAME. I don't even have to analyze your posts...they all say the same thing. "Inactives are a threat to this town, we must get rid of them first." What I find interesting is that after spending all game saying this, the very first post you make after we find some scum is "Forget inactives...let's start looking for scum now!" As Mataza pointed out, 2 of the 4 most inactive players voted rightly for who they thought was scum. The other 2 bandwaggoned on someone more inactive than they are. I mean, great success on the first day might render my approach irrelevant in this game, but you can't count on every game getting lucky with a loud-mouth the first day. Sometimes that same loud-mouth will be a bad townie. I don't want to lynch inactives. I want to threaten them with a lynch to the point they are forced to contribute to the game, and then we can start scumhunting. While written information for analysis is the best way to approach scum hunt, as I'm sure both you and mataza will agree with me in, vote patterns are also something you can base scum-hunting on. I am all for putting pressure on inactive people to step up and provide us with information, but I did not get much support for it last night, so I'll just admit... I'm kind of giving up on that approach, and gonna go with the ammunition I have at hand to get the baddies. I had a bad read on Gyig, looks like I had a good read on Mataza. I actually thought they were both townies pointing fingers at each other. But yeah, Mataza looks really clean now. But listen up here: I'm going to retract my first statement about only analysing the people who did not vote for Giyg. I went back and re-read all his posts, and he's so chaotic and bad, that there is a possibility of the mafia simply throwing him under the bus to gain trust, because he was always going to get lynched anyway. I'm not going to start pointing fingers just yet, but someone like purplehaze looks really damn safe now after being the deciding vote that got a mafia lynched. It's not far-fetched to think that any smart mafia would consider throwing their useless buddy under the bus to buy safety. Lastly: It is important to no end that VisEyes and Mataza leave their thoughts in this thread before day breaks, you two are by fare the most likely mafia targets. Of the townies that actually contributed on day one, myself and Kersha are probably safe, seeing as it'll be easy to convince the town to vote against us. purplehaze is in a weird spot, but I don't think he'll get murdered. Might post your thoughts anyway though. As I pointed out in the post referenced, I remain VERY suspicious of Palmar's decision to keep his post on DeepBlu2. Not only was the rest of town voting between Giygas and Skrammen, but his reasoning for keeping his vote on DeepBlu2 was 'Well, I saw no reason to change. I wanted them both out of the game, and one of them was going home' What I find interesting is that he viewed it from such a departed standpoint. WE (rest of Town) were already voting. I find this VERY suspicious because rather than taking a stand with the rest of his 'team', he let everyone else decide the fate of the lynch d1...as if he were a scum trying to not be on the wrong side of the lynch. Not to mention the fact that he states in VERY BOLD LETTERS I DO NOT WANT TO LYNCH INACTIVES - I WANT TO FORCE THEM INTO ACTIVITY WITH VOTES...but he doesn't change his vote when DeepBlu2 posts analysis THE VERY NEXT POST...he sticks with DeepBlu2 in spite of that. Based on shaky reasoning and absolutely NO analysis beyond "Oh, well, he bandwagoned."....most of the votes that day were bandwagon votes...and you know what? Mafia got lynched. + Show Spoiler + On May 19 2011 06:57 VisceraEyes wrote: Allow me to offer up another, perhaps more likely scenario. One that doesn't rely on utter noobiness as the basis of its believability. Revisiting my scumlist we see that I had prplhz, Palmar and GiygaS. For this example, I'm going to assume you're all three mafia. At any rate, before your switch, we see that you and GiygaS were both voting for Skrammen. Not only does this effectively block the vote for GiygaS, but it allows Palmar to Off-vote (vote for someone NO ONE ELSE is voting for..very scummy behavior at the end of the day) to ensure that even if in the event someone switches last minute, he could swoop in and recast his vote for Skrammen. Good. Great. But then we take into account the fact that A) GiygaS is highly under suspicion of the most active (and most accurate so far) scumhunter, Mataza and B) He's playing bad scum and C) Mafia can converse with each other, it isn't far-fetched to believe that a last-minute switch from inactive Skrammen to obvScum GiygaS would not only clear your name ("See? I voted for scum too!", but pave the way for Palmar to then go on a witch-hunt of those who voted against GiygaS lynch. "But VE, why wouldn't Palmar just vote for GiygaS himself?" you might be asking...well, if you'll read the rules, the person with the most votes first is the target in the event of a tie...which would've resulted in Skrammen getting lynched anyway. BOOM HEADSHOT. GG Maf. Fire away...I don't even NEED to post anymore! ![]() I included this post because it outlines my prediction of how the first day's lynch went down. Now that Mataza has flipped green, I feel absolutely confident that this is an accurate assessment of what happened. Also to add to this prediction, I feel it's worth noting that Palmar and prplhz haven't voted together YET in this game. As town we have to try and come to a consensus on who to vote off...as Mafia, it's dangerous to vote with your buddies as voting patterns can be analyzed. A common defense to this is to try and fool the town into voting who you want off, and voting seperately from your scum friends. Obviously this is a WIFOM scenario, but I do find it extremely convenient for them that one cannot put them together based on voting patterns. To close, I know I've been a very outspoken and peculiar character in this game. I know I've come close to quitting and leaving you all to deal with this mess without me...I'm sure some of you wish I had. I just want to say that this has been a VERY fun game and I've enjoyed playing it with you. (even the inactives ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I stated this in the vote post, but I switched my vote to vote with town. It's going to be VERY important in the next few cycles. I realize that bandwagon voting is suspicious, but I stand by my vote and will not apologize for it further. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
##Vote: Palmar ...I'm just getting started! I agree with a vote for Palmar because DeepBlu2 was Palmar's target d1 and it's reasonable to assume that after the mafia missed their suspect for a PR n1 they went for the easiest candidate that suspected them n2. And since DeepBlu2 was suspicious of prplhz, he seems like a safe candidate for lynch d3 if Palmar flips red, for obvious reasons (at least to me...) | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I find it interesting that you're so certain I was in no danger of getting lynched. What, prplhz didn't like the idea? Thought you guys might be able to leverage my living the night as a way to discredit me? Fair enough. @prplhz I agree with your assessment that Wunder is probably town and there isn't much suspicious about Hiro. I assume this is leading somewhere in the direction of 'This guy is innocent, this guy is innocent...oh, what have we here Vis Eyes?'...but I'll go ahead and disagree with you in advance that VisceraEyes is suspicious. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
My vote was so sudden because I'm so certain. I assume Wunder feels the same way. I do not encourage you to vote quickly if you're not sure...please take all the time you need to analyze before you vote. But if your decision is to vote someone other than Palmar, I ask that you give a strong argument so that those of us who've already voted have the opportunity to consider your case and change our vote if necessary. As I've stated several times now, I think that voting as a whole is going to be very important to Town winning this thing in the end. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'd say Skrammen due to inactivity... | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Inactivity is now a plague on this town. Who do we vote off first Mafia? I'll accept anyone who's inactive. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I also apologize for tunnelling you guys so hard. Looking back, I realized the only reason I suspected YOU in particular was your huge amount of posts (more stuff for me to insert suspicious WIFOM into) and your closeness with prplhz. As you appear to have answered for your closeness with prplhz, I'm going to go back and objectively go through your posts and see if there's anything suspicious (aside from your DeepBlu vote d1 which was the main point of my suspicion of you previously) at ALL. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
As for the post above this one, calling inactives to lynch...I've been VERY frustrated from the lack of activity from players like Skrammen and Wunder, posting once and voting every cycle, but literally doing nothing else the whole game. It doesn't matter if suspicion is cast on them or not, they won't be back to answer for it until a few hours after the cycle-post. This is bad for town because not only does it cast suspicion on them if they're green, but it makes them harder to spot if they're red. All and all, it's just bad for town this late in the game. Especially when there are a few VERY active posters who are A)doing all the heavy lifting because they're good at the game (Mataza, Palmar) or B)derailing scum-hunting by posting nonsense (GiygaS, VisceraEyes). I'm not sure how much I'll get done in the way of reanalysis (I'm at work, might be until the vote), but because he's one of my suspects (for reasons that should be clear by now...there's a lot of rhetoric, but there's content there if you read), and because Palmar's argument is so convincing and prplhz thinks it's a good idea too... ##Vote: prplhz If prplhz flips red, Palmar will be cleared as far as I'm concerned. Well played sir. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'm committed to prplhz at this point. I've already switched once today, and while I'm not necessarily concerned if switching again looks suspicious, I'd rather not because I'd like us to all unite and vote someone off as a team rather than the sporadic factions we've been pushing the last two days. @Wunder Palmar gave a convincing analysis on prplhz...PLEASE read it and consider switching from Palmar to prplhz...if for no other reason than to get a quasi-final read on Palmar before voting him off. @Hiro I know you don't want to die today. Voting with town will look really good for you. @Everyone else I know inactives have been getting a harsh rep this game. Come play with us, guys. We need your help. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
How do you feel about Palmar? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'm gonna go smoke a bowl and meditate on this. Sry prplhz. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
j/p welcome. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Good luck tonight everyone. I'll make a post before 10p in case I'm the target tonight (it looks less and less likely each day.) | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I suggest looking at Hiro, Stefftastiq and (unfortunately) Sinani for tomorrow's lynch so far. More in-depth analysis (with actual evidence) forthcoming. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I considered calling ur bluff Palmar...I don't think you've got the guts. ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Well played Palmar. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Horang2 Dota 2![]() Bisu ![]() Flash ![]() Sea ![]() Jaedong ![]() Mini ![]() Soma ![]() EffOrt ![]() Stork ![]() Larva ![]() [ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • davetesta32 StarCraft: Brood War• intothetv ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s Dota 2 League of Legends |
WardiTV European League
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|