
TL Mafia XXVIII - Page 3
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
![]() ## Unvote Abstain ## Vote Chaoser I could be a total sucker, but I believe Subversion, and Chaoser reminded me of pre-post-edit? Annnd apparently I walk away from computers and forget to hit post. -_- | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On July 22 2010 13:09 Pandain wrote: Haha! Holy shit. Mine WAS the deciding factor. Na would've been 9-9 if you voted Chaoser, and DTA had more votes first. Still close tho. Anxious to see the flip. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
8 + 1 = 9 ? | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On July 23 2010 08:45 chaoser wrote: fuck it, I give up with the vote list, I checked three times and the numbers aren't working out over about 20-25 pages. I'll just post what I have and examine it. lol yea I feel your pain. BM's vote count on page 6x (x = 1, 2, .. etc) is accurate. So was yours on like page 50, but the rest are all bad. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
## Vote Double Lynch | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On July 23 2010 14:48 chaoser wrote: I do however know that a Vigi hit SOMEONE tonight. That Vigi should claim since they are regular townie now and say who they hit and why. Mafia doesn't gain anything from them claiming, I think. Also, if it's a false claim, real Vigi can always claim as well and then we have a 1 v 1. Either way, one mafia is dying if they fake claim. I'm also going to go to sleep but I feel I have enough evidence to compile a case against someone by tomorrow morning Despite my voting for you yesterday, this actually seems like a solid plan. Am I missing some clever loophole? | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On July 23 2010 15:16 Subversion wrote: what scenario happened that there were 3 hits? Roffles died, Jayme died, and BloodyC0bbler is claiming he was hit last night. Only way to get additional night hits are Vigilante, Mad Hatter, or Infested Terran. Since the last two roles require the initiator's death (and no Mad Hatter / IT has died), the only possible scenario is that a Vigilante sent out a shot last night (not necessarily on BC, that could've been Mafia). | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
Yeah I realized this just as I was typing my reply to Subversion ![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On July 02 2010 07:57 Bill Murray wrote: Mafia KP: 2 (until they have under 1.5 when divided by 2) | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On July 23 2010 15:27 d3_crescentia wrote: I actually disagree here. If 2 scum step up and counterclaim it exposes them in the open under public scrutiny. We can lynch the first claimant (the one who fired the shot) and see if he told the truth. Then we can have the other two shoot each other during the night with their vigi shots. If neither of them dies then we know they're both lying. Also, it seems like an incredibly BAD idea for a townie to claim vigi at all, period. What will be more likely is that the vigi will claim, no one will contest and the mafia will take out the vigi during the night to prevent any new information from being introduced into the game. If BC is lying, then there were only 2 hits last night. If there were only 2 hits last night, then no Vigilante fired a shot (unless Mafia stacked, but this seems highly unlikely). Therefore when we call for a Vigilante to claim, some Mafia could claim it worry-free, since no one else could claim it. Worse yet, this Mafia member that claimed could be Godfather and have picked the Vigilante role, so there's no way to know there either (or BC is GF under the guise of a Veteran). Thus both the claiming Vigilante and BC would need to be checked. If neither were Mafia, only then would we know for sure. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On July 23 2010 15:32 d3_crescentia wrote: Think so. Problem is that Roffles isn't around to contest it. But, as I said, if the vigi stepped up and said something it could drastically drop down BC's chances of being mafia, if we confirmed the vig by lynch. I realize this would be super-unhappy-times for the vig. =[ Why would it be bad for a vigilante who's already used their night hit to claim? They're essentially a townie at this point.. I guess it gives Mafia a little bit of info about who's who (so they know not to waste a hit on that player if they're blue-hunting). But isn't this outweighed by the benefit of knowing BC's claim for sure (again after DT checks). It seems like a bold move for Mafia to fake-claim the vigilante hit, as doing so means they're feeding 2 members to a town that hasn't caught a single one yet (tho hopefully today'll be different). | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
But there's gotta be some other catch I'm missing. Or maybe I'm just wary of people roleclaiming in general which is why I'm getting that "vibe" from this plan. | ||
| ||