TL Mafia XXII - Page 82
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
| ||
nbtnbt5
232 Posts
On April 28 2010 08:50 Incognito wrote: Hello nbtnbt5, would you care to explain to us why you voted for Scaramanga? I'm pretty easily swayed... (as you can see from my blind support of BM's assassin plan when I really didn't read/understand it) | ||
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
On April 28 2010 08:41 Incognito wrote: BrownBear. If you want reasoning, you can have it. Three important posts about him. First post about the Caller/Ace situation. At first, this sounds like a post that supports Caller's lynch. It seemingly says to trust Ace on Caller unless Caller turns up green, which is perfectly logical. However, why does this require so many words? If you look at the underlying tone of this message, it looks to plant seeds of doubt on Ace's credibility. BrownBear a) questions why Ace is still alive if he is truly a DT, b) mentions how Ace's DT check is "easily fakeable" (he could forge a pm from flamewheel, which is in fact, illegal, but whatevers), and c) finds it "interesting" that Ace mentioned how Radfield (a dead DT) was critical for the town. Lets unpack. Questioning Ace's DT alignment is a good move for the mafia. They know Caller was innocent, so by questioning Ace's alignment, they could prepare to say "see I told you" when Caller flips green and lynch Ace the next day. Furthermore, BrownBear downscales the validity of Ace's rolecheck, saying that it is virtually unprovable. While we did see BC also make a similar attack and BC was town, the other parts of BrownBear's post show that BrownBear's logic is different. BC was relying on previous (and widely known) metagame tactics to lynch the DT as the best course of action for the town, while BrownBear simply doubts Ace's checks because they are "unprovable". Whether or not you agree with the BC's proposed strategy, at least he provided one. BrownBear, on the other hand, does nothing of the sort, and simply attacks Ace's validity without providing a logical underlying reason. The reasons he gives are that there is no proof. BrownBear's post has direction or basis in logic. It is merely a doubt post. In addition, BrownBear brings up Ace's post where he tells the medics to protect Radfield, who is the only hope for the town to win. Why does he bring this up and only say that "it is very very strange to me"? By saying this, BrownBear is trying to implicate Ace's role in Radfield's death, without actually explicitly attacking him. Why does BrownBear mention all the above points? It doesn't make sense if he were town. As a townie, its obvious that if Caller flips green, Ace is BSing and should be lynched. There's no further need to place doubt on Ace. Unless of course you're mafia trying to get brownie points. Ok. So that was my first post of the game. I was questioning Ace at that point because back then, we actually HAD no evidence that Ace was DT and that he had rolechecked Caller (see, I didn't know you couldn't fake PMs until you told me just now. Sorry.) Given the information I had, which is thus: -Ace claims Caller red, and says he's DT. -Ace's evidence: I rolechecked him, and I'm DT cause of this PM (which I didn't know wasn't fakeable). From that standpoint, is it really so hard to believe that I was somewhat suspicious? I mean, I friggin said, "hey, I'm not entirely sure Ace is telling the truth, so let's lynch the dude he wants us to, but if he flips wrong, then we know Ace is lying." The other stuff I said was my evidence for doubting Ace, so forgive me for trying to back up my point that I wasn't entirely sure Ace was DT, as opposed to just saying, "I'm not sure Ace is telling the truth, so lets lynch Caller and lynch Ace if he's wrong." If I had just posted that instead of providing analysis, I'm pretty sure people would have jumped on that and said, "wow, oneline posts, no substance, OMG SCUM." So what you're saying here is, I'm in a lose-lose situation. Wheeee. On April 28 2010 08:41 Incognito wrote: Second big post by BrownBear. First off, we know that before this post, RoL already claimed that he checked BC as a MAFIA. So why does BrownBear say BC is an assassin? First off, let us first assume that BrownBear is town. A logical reason for calling BC an assassin, is naturally, because he doesn't believe RoL is a DT. Which he does post. So from a town-point of view, BB's actions make sense here. Now let's assume that BrownBear is mafia. Well, given from the previous debacle with Ace/Caller, the mafia might be afraid of millers and would be moved to consider attempting to lynch the unconfirmed DT before he is confirmed. The mafia knew that RoL wasn't mafia, and therefore was either a green BSing, or a DT/Assassin. Because of the risk of getting (another) confirmed DT, it makes sense that the mafia would want to kill RoL first. BC was a suspicious target anyway, and they could probably get him lynched after that, even if RoL did not turn out to be DT/Assassin. And if RoL turned out to be DT/Assassin, it would be all the more easier to lynch BC the next day. Win-win for the mafia. Now we have two reasonable explanations here. Both make sense, and are reasonable interpretations. So I guess we'd have to look elsewhere for more information. Again, this is a situation where you seem to be just assuming the worst from me. Is it impossible for you to realize that my logic? There was only one detective. His name was Ace. Thus, it made the most sense to me that RoL had to be BSing, as I wasn't expecting him to pull the bonehead move of actually REVEALING that he was an Assassin. I mean, somehow it worked out for him, but hey, y'know, that's how Mafia goes. That was my logic, and it still makes sense to me. The second part of your argument hinges on supposed Mafia-me thinking that RoL might be a detective, thus getting him out of the way early would be worth it. Here, sir, is where you trip up. I'm pretty sure that we can all be agreed on this point, even Mafia: THERE ARE NOT 3 DETECTIVES IN THIS GAME. We knew the identity of 2 already (Radfield and Ace), and 3 would be overpowered in favor of the town. Thus, RoL could not have been a Detective. Even if we thought he was, and decided to try to bump him off because of it, this leaves another gaping hole in your logic: Why did he survive the night, if I was mafia and thought him a potential DT? On April 28 2010 08:41 Incognito wrote: BrownBear makes a defense post, where he acknowledges that he now thinks Ace is 100% DT (whereas before he was was still doubting), and throws up a poor analysis of Bill Murray. Absolutely trash analysis, which, contrasts with his previous analyses. (At least his BC and RoL analysis had some decent logic). The one sided, incomplete, and grossly mis-representative analysis of BM makes me think that this was thrown up in a hurry to avoid suspicion. Very shady here. What else is wrong with this analysis though? It focuses on Bill Murray as a good analyst and says that "he has yet to accuse random people without some evidence, except for at the beginning of the game". First off, Bill isn't a good analyst, and even then, the material that BB focuses on is that BM correctly guessed an assassin and a DT, which are not the most pro-town of activities. Analysis on mafia is very different than speculation on blues, and here, BB seems to want to want to make us think that Bill is useful because he has good analysis. Furthermore, BB also says that the fact that Bill hasn't random accused recently makes him more pro-town. While it may be true that Bill hasn't done that recently, he hasn't even been active recently either. BB's attempt to play up Bill's analysis skills and dismiss his early random accusations (scummy behavior) reminds me of a mafia trying to defend another mafia. Which brings me to another point: Unlike other candidates right now, BrownBear's lynch gives us information for tomorrow's lynch. If BrownBear flips red, we get a juicy lynch target for tomorrow. Ok, you got me here, I admit the analysis was thrown up in a hurry, and wasn't very good at all. However, are you really insulting my intelligence that much to say that I would throw up a sycophantic post about a fellow mafia? That's such an obvious giveaway. Also, you say if I flip red, you get a juicy lynch target tomorrow (BM). However, think about this: You CANNOT afford to have me flip green or blue at this point. You have to be right. And there are several people here acting far far more scummy than me. They should be our targets, not me. On April 28 2010 08:41 Incognito wrote: People have stated that this is scummy because it is a preemptive defense. That is true, but there's more to look at here than just that. As I have already told everyone before, While I wrote this to address the problem of ppl justifying their votes by just blindly following someone, the same principle applies to analysis. Own your analysis. Don't hedge your possible error. Adding fluff words to distance themselves away from their analysis is something that scum do to attempt to flee accountability if they're wrong. Justifying your analysis by saying "but oh, if he's town, he's useless anyway" is a great way for you to hide if you're mafia. Sure BrownBear, you could have done this even if you were town. But given all the other things you've done, that possibility does not seem too likely. Luckily, this statement also gives us direction on what to do tomorrow if you flip red. It tells us that we should probably not lynch Fishball. Man, people are sure jumping on my paranoia there. You must be, what, the 3rd or 4th person to mention that? On April 28 2010 08:41 Incognito wrote: One more thing, the icing on the cake: This is a BS response. Before he even acknowledges the fact that he preemptively defended himself, he tells us why he's concerned about getting bandwagoned. That wasn't the question. And it looks bad when you defend yourself on a question on why you're defending yourself when you haven't even been attacked yet. Summary: BrownBear is scummy and should be lynched. Yes there are other scummy people out there. But unlike other alternatives, BrownBear has said enough that we have leads tomorrow if he flips red. So we get a bonus here because we off a very suspicious character while also learning information. Win-win for us. Ahhh, fuck it, I'm not even bothering anymore. I don't really need to answer, for myself anymore, because I'm gonna go back to this line you said early on: On April 28 2010 08:41 Incognito wrote: b) mentions how Ace's DT check is "easily fakeable" (he could forge a pm from flamewheel, which is in fact, illegal, but whatevers), Fine. So forging a PM from flamewheel is illegal in this game. That's totally fine. I'm gonna throw up the one flamewheel sent me, in that case, since Ace did it already, I'm assuming it's a legitimate strategy: [QUOTE]flamewheel91 wrote: ----------------------------------------- Original Message: Excellent, you will be replacing Zona, who is a veteran. I'd suggest reading the OP, current thread, and old games to familiarize yourself. Sites such as mafiascum.net are also good for learning to play mafia. Good luck to you and thanks for joining on such a short notice! I will be making a post in the thread announcing your arrival. ----------------------------------------- Original Message: I would like in, if this is still available! ----------------------------------------- Original Message: Hi again good sir, Once again we need a replacement, so if you still want in here's your chance ![]() So, by your own logic, you cannot now lynch me. I may be targeted by mafia for this, I may even have incurred flamewheel's wrath and be modkilled. So be it. But I will be DAMNED if the town's gonna waste a valuable lynch on a blue character. ![]() [/B] | ||
Korynne
Canada990 Posts
On April 27 2010 18:13 meeple wrote: Yearg... you really love to put all the emphasis out there with caps and bolds on all your important parts... god forbid you learn how to use colours ![]() These types of things were a nice contribution... Before now, it's mainly thoughts about stuff that's already happened and now she's being proactive and forming plans and putting forward ideas. (Do I smell a math major?) You should go find my first post, it had lots of spoilers and quotes in it. =D And yes, I'm a math major. >_> On a serious note, I'm not convinced that Scara is town, but I'm convinced that he's useless enough to leave alone for now. | ||
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
| ||
Korynne
Canada990 Posts
So it's a good forgery, if nothing else. xD | ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
He's still under suspicion, perhaps now more than before... but if he's mafia it will be really difficult for him to get away with. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
Just to let you know... Cheating includes... 6. Posting any PM you receive from a host. | ||
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
I guess I get modkilled, sorry about that. I assumed that since Ace had done it before, it was ok. | ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On April 28 2010 13:58 BrownBear wrote: Really? Fuck. How come Ace did it earlier and got away with it? I guess I get modkilled, sorry about that. I assumed that since Ace had done it before, it was ok. Ace roleclaimed... but didn't post the PM iirc | ||
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
On April 20 2010 06:46 Ace wrote: From: flamewheel91 Subject: Your Fate Date: Some Random Day Welcome to TL Mafia XXII aka kill yourself or live trying! Your role is: Failure Every day you will be forced to read the thread full of idiots discussing things that gets them no closer to winning! They will randomly bandwagon each other, call Day 1 a crapshoot and an excuse not to scum hunt and then go down in a big ball of doom. Powers: You are a Detective! You also have 3 nukes. PM flamewheel91 if you have any questions about your role or the meaning of life. [QUOTE] So that's my defense I guess. I mean, I can't really choose to argue if fw decides to modkill me, and this is pretty obviously faked, but when I was skimming through the archives way back when to catch up on the game, it looked legit. Not really an excuse, but either way, that's what I gone and done. My sincerest apologies. *Goes out into field, starts flying kite with key attached near the top* | ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
| ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On April 28 2010 12:22 nbtnbt5 wrote: I'm pretty easily swayed... (as you can see from my blind support of BM's assassin plan when I really didn't read/understand it) I'm getting sick of people using "I suck" or variations as an excuse for questionable actions. | ||
Korynne
Canada990 Posts
| ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On April 28 2010 14:38 Korynne wrote: *sigh* But claiming veteran is pretty awesome for mafia, because then they have a reason for why they weren't hit at night. Ah there will be some tell... unless the mafia double up hits on someone... a missing mafia hit will mean either a medic or a veteran took it. But you're right.. the mafia don't really want to hit him now... since it will be an expensive kill. erg | ||
johnnyspazz
Taiwan1470 Posts
| ||
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
Too bad all the votes are still on BrownBear. | ||
![]()
IntoTheWow
is awesome32269 Posts
(kidding) | ||
Korynne
Canada990 Posts
| ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On April 28 2010 16:57 Korynne wrote: So does this mean BrownBear will be modkilled? Or we still voting him off the island anyway? xD If he's allowed to continue playing I would probably encourage people to stave off voting for BrownBear... any roleclaim, especially such a fumbled one... should be taken at least somewhat seriously. Although I admit this one is really difficult to verify. We can't afford to lose a blue right now... | ||
| ||