Anyway, I'm still noticing that more than a few people have voted for me, and a grand total of ZERO of them have asked me to explain anything. Either they have some grand evidence that I'm not aware of, or they're simply voting for no good reason.
TL Mafia XXII - Page 84
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Scamp
United States1086 Posts
Anyway, I'm still noticing that more than a few people have voted for me, and a grand total of ZERO of them have asked me to explain anything. Either they have some grand evidence that I'm not aware of, or they're simply voting for no good reason. | ||
d3_crescentia
United States4053 Posts
Who do we have as candidates? Scaramanga? nbtnbt5? I've outlined in a previous post that we should be okay lynching a townie today so long as we get two tomorrow, but the logic no longer applies because BrownBear's already dead. We're now looking at a situation where if we mislynch today we lose, even if we manage to hit both lynches tomorrow and all of our subsequent ones. As for Scamp, it's posting like this: On April 29 2010 07:09 Scamp wrote: I really really don't like Scaramanga's play at all. All he does is do whatever he can do to avoid getting killed. This is terrible townie play. However, just about every person that I suspect is voting for him, so I've decided to go with Incognito on this one. That gets you cast under suspicion. It essentially amounts to "I guess Scaramanga could be mafia but maybe not??" | ||
nbtnbt5
232 Posts
On April 29 2010 06:12 Incognito wrote:Not a lot of time to reach a majority, but I now think nbtnbt5 would be a good bet. Why? Well, first off, he's inactive. Like a lot of other people. But he's "interested that nai.protoss chose to analyze a really inactive poster". In itself, that sounds suspicious. Trying to hide much? Furthermore, when asked why he voted for Scaramanga, he says that he is pretty easily swayed, and cites blind support for BM's plan. Sorry, but you can't just get away with blind support. If he was truly swayed by the argument against Scaramanga (as presented by Rage methinks?), then he would know that the argument was that Scara is useless. Now, what exactly have you done, nbtnbt5? Hypocrisy much? I wasn't entirely swayed by Rage's post. It's just I was unsure on who to vote for and saw a bandwagon forming, so I just jumped on it. Except the bandwagon died, and now I'm not sure who to vote for. Anyways, I'm just lurking because I don't feel I can contribute anything (bad townie here). | ||
nbtnbt5
232 Posts
On April 29 2010 07:11 madnessman wrote: What the heck is this? I'm starting to think nbtnbt5 is getting WAY too complacent in this game. Such posting is unacceptable... While understandable as terrible play as mafia, I can't fathom why any town-aligned player would EVER post like this. Irregardless of new or not new. Unlike nai who actually came out and analyzed somebody, nbt's post history is a series of one liners, and he hasn't even responded to or acknowledged korynn's request. I am thus changing my vote to him, in the hope that he feels pressured to properly explain himself. Sorry >.< And sorry, but what was korynn's request? | ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On April 29 2010 09:01 nbtnbt5 wrote: Sorry >.< And sorry, but what was korynn's request? She posted a list and asked people to analyze the person 16 down from them... Go search it. I don't even know who to go after tonight... and the deadline is in 45 minutes... | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On April 29 2010 06:54 Ace wrote: jeezus christ lol :7 | ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On April 29 2010 07:46 d3_crescentia wrote: We're grasping at straws here, after BrownBear flipped blue. Who do we have as candidates? Scaramanga? nbtnbt5? I've outlined in a previous post that we should be okay lynching a townie today so long as we get two tomorrow, but the logic no longer applies because BrownBear's already dead. We're now looking at a situation where if we mislynch today we lose, even if we manage to hit both lynches tomorrow and all of our subsequent ones. As for Scamp, it's posting like this: That gets you cast under suspicion. It essentially amounts to "I guess Scaramanga could be mafia but maybe not??" i really dont see why youre putting FoS on him, yet voting for me... makes no sense. i am one of the most obvious town players remaining. people should really just vote with me, lynch scamp, and ride my coattails to victory. he is obviously scum, and has been detracting from and derailing the thread from the get go with his shitty one liners. not only that, but he is trying to wagon someone for being inactive/noob in a lylo situation. that's OBVIOUS scum. | ||
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On April 29 2010 09:44 Bill Murray wrote: he is obviously scum, and has been detracting from and derailing the thread from the get go with his shitty one liners. not only that, but he is trying to wagon someone for being inactive/noob in a lylo situation. that's OBVIOUS scum. This is a dangerous generalization to make. You have to be able to distinguish between noob town and mafia. What you described could be either. That said, he's a waaaay better target than Scara. Here's hoping he flips red. | ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
Night 4: After the hubbub caused by BrownBear in the morning, there was not enough cohesiveness in the town to decide on a lynch candidate. As such, day ended without there being a candidate for lynch, but to make up for this, the town unanimously decided to pass a double lynch for day 5. As there was no majority on a single player, there is no lynch for Day 4. Double Lynch is passed for Day 5. Night 4 starts now. Deadline is Friday, Apr 30 1:00am GMT (GMT+00:00). Get your actions to me, please. | ||
motbob
United States12546 Posts
| ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
| ||
Korynne
Canada990 Posts
We've probably lost by this point. Inactivity and modkills suck. =( So it's 11/6, then after tonight it will be 8/6 if medics are unlucky. I would go with random protection, best chance we have. | ||
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
Lynch suspects for tomorrow are: almost everyone. Hasn't changed much. But I wouldn't be surprised if flamewheel ends the game if the mafia makes their hits. So medics are pretty much our only hope. There's not too much analysis to do at this point. Just waiting to see what happens... | ||
Scamp
United States1086 Posts
On April 29 2010 09:44 Bill Murray wrote:i really dont see why youre putting FoS on him, yet voting for me... makes no sense. i am one of the most obvious town players remaining. people should really just vote with me, lynch scamp, and ride my coattails to victory. he is obviously scum, and has been detracting from and derailing the thread from the get go with his shitty one liners. not only that, but he is trying to wagon someone for being inactive/noob in a lylo situation. that's OBVIOUS scum. Exactly where am I wagoning someone for being inactive/noob? You're just generalizing and incorrect at the same time. Shitty one-liners from the get-go? Are you even paying attention? Ride your coattails? You haven't done anything. There's nothing to ride. | ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
For some reason Bill Murray and nbtnbt5 strike me as mafia... I'll compile a good reason list in a bit. | ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On April 29 2010 16:37 Bill Murray wrote: you are truly an idiot meeple Oh? You have a better idea? Throw it out there man, I'm all ears... | ||
RaGe
Belgium9942 Posts
I don't even understand why they want to play? Do they only care about the game if they get a special role? | ||
RaGe
Belgium9942 Posts
Original message: - Such is the misery of playing a Mafia game where inactivity is tolerated. Everyone and their mother proudly proclaims to be a useless townie, so all you have left is useless townies and mafia posing as useless townies, with no way to separate them. | ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
Perhaps a different criteria for inactivity is in order. Regardless I still think we can pick the red out. Have faith | ||
| ||