| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On April 19 2010 14:26 Ace wrote: I actually saw one intelligent post. But still you guys are useless. I'm just gonna chill until I die.  thanks for conforming. | ||
|
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
On April 19 2010 14:23 Ace wrote: The fact that you guys are discussing people as "most likely innocent" just shows you have no clue wtf to do. Uh...then why didn't you say this previously when I did it in Red Army II? Is it because this time you don't agree with my list? Hmm?? | ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32278 Posts
On April 19 2010 14:12 Jugan wrote: Your posting and change of story seems extremely suspicious, and you have now been put #1 on my suspect list. On April 19 2010 10:11 Jugan wrote: OH NOES!!! ANYTHING BUT THAT!!1!111!1!!!ONE!!11!  | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On April 19 2010 14:27 Incognito wrote: Uh...then why didn't you say this previously when I did it in Red Army II? Is it because this time you don't agree with my list? Hmm?? He be jealous he ain't on it. | ||
|
Jugan
United States1566 Posts
On April 19 2010 14:15 BloodyC0bbler wrote: I was in no way trying to make it out to be "lets lynch all the inactives" more as a point in his inept defense. As well, he did have a point that he was making badly on the subject, I figured what I posted was it. However, I am so far impressed with your ability, good job sir! Forgive me for the mixup, the second part of my post was meant for IntoTheWow. You are doing a great job Cobbler! On April 19 2010 14:16 Incognito wrote: Jugan: When I say I await responses, I don't mean I'm going to sit here and wait till Osmoses replies. People (like you) can and should also comment. Right now, you seem spammy and happy to ignore responding to my post. I invite you to do so so we can keep this discussion actually moving in a coherent direction. Oh, I honestly thought you were waiting for Osmoses to answer your accusation. Forgive me, but I do not feel that I am "spamming". On a more serious note, I was taking time to ponder your post as, traditionally, I am not one to make accusations lightly. I'm sorry if my thinking process upset you. However, I do believe you have a good point - Osmoses does seem a little suspicious. What struck me as odd is, indeed, the discrepancies between the two posts that you highlighted. If we take that into account, his first post does indeed become suspicious too - Where he suggests saving the double lynch until the very end (as if to dissuade us from using a very powerful tool). I agree with most of your analysis about using the "newbie excuse" to promote their own clueless behavior, I also would like to point out that (in my experience) newbies do point out that they are, in fact, newbies and ask for a little leeway. However, I agree with you yet again that Osmoses is far past that point as his behavior seems not only suspicious but uses far more complex reasoning than "just a clueless newbie" would use. | ||
|
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
On April 19 2010 14:26 Ace wrote: I actually saw one intelligent post. But still you guys are useless. I'm just gonna chill until I die. Well, then would you mind explaining which post this is so we can generate some discussion and actually point us in an "intelligent" direction? | ||
|
Jugan
United States1566 Posts
The difference is that I was suspicious for having "aimless" discussions (yeah, I was trolling a little). You're suspicious for being a bad actor with lack of helpful posts that you yourself urged others to contribute. Additionally, you have failed to answer any questions or arguments regarding your statements. The discussion I put forth welcomed you to share your insight with us or at least the reasoning behind your ridiculous accusations. However, seeing that your contributions to this discussion has degenerated SO BAD that you can't even bring yourself to post 1-liners (and instead just quote a post and add no text), you yourself, by your own reasoning, stand out as the most suspicious of all of us and thus deserved to be lynched (again, by your own reasoning). | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
If you compare his start to the game (one liners) to now, you would see the difference already, and wouldn't need to draw it out. I would even excuse most of his one liners as well, don't need much for the point or b) lack of real posting so far. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Jugan
United States1566 Posts
Whatever the case may be, you have been a sore disappointment thusfar. | ||
|
Jugan
United States1566 Posts
On April 19 2010 14:38 Bill Murray wrote: jugan u wanna play some 2v2? 2v2 in SC1 or SC2? note for Qatol: he posted like 2 seconds before i posted mine. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
Mod: am i allowed to pm if its not about mafia? | ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
Damn it why am I so British. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On April 19 2010 14:39 Jugan wrote: I was truly excited to play a mafia game with someone as prestigious as IntoTheWow. You were a community member that I respected and looked up to. However, I am truly disappointed in not only your faulty logic, but your approach to the game when people ask you to open up to a discussion you yourself began. I am not sure if it is because you are incapable of having an intelligent discussion, or because you really area mafia member, or are just not the person I (and others) look up to. Whatever the case may be, you have been a sore disappointment thusfar. Peoples ability to be a good TL member doesn't translate into mafia skill. Mafia skill translates into mafia skill. | ||
|
Jugan
United States1566 Posts
On April 19 2010 14:42 flamewheel91 wrote: I can't control your life, so sure. Nothing about mafia though, honour system! Damn it why am I so British. Dude, I wanna be british. On April 19 2010 14:40 Bill Murray wrote: sc1 i didnt know u were one of the chosen few to have sc2 Mod: am i allowed to pm if its not about mafia? Well I wasn't really chosen. A couple weeks ago one of my friends said "hey man... I got a beta key for sc2". I seriously flipped out and went WTF ARE YOU SERIOUS? I thought he was the biggest douchebag liar in the history of the universe (because he kept talking about it), until he said "hey man I just got a friend key" and sent it to me. ENGINEERS UNITE! :D | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
IntoTheWow
is awesome32278 Posts
On April 19 2010 14:35 BloodyC0bbler wrote: If you compare his start to the game (one liners) to now, you would see the difference already, and wouldn't need to draw it out. I would even excuse most of his one liners as well, don't need much for the point or b) lack of real posting so far. Well at the point in which I made the list he had lots of 1-2 liners with little substance, save for 1 post. Most of those posts contained jokes/trolling/random crap. It could be very well be interpreted as a way to keep his name in the active people list without saying anything. I even asked him for reasons for his vote, and he said "my vote is as serious as it gets". Not like I didn't give him a chance. @ Jugan, I already explained some reasoning besides voting inactives. But since the thread seems to be kind of derailed, I guess I'll give you more, with the consequence of running some luring: accusing inactive might bring the silent mafia out. I don't know how many of you guys have played real life Mafia, but basically you pressure people into giving information. Since online they can take all the time they want to create a persona and what not, I figured making the list would bring some info up (excuses for not posting, counter-accusations) or at least fuel some discussion on what to do. Also someone mentioned, not asking for information, so I figured I would search all the info myself. If you disagree with my analysis you are free to open up all the thread like I did and read all the posts user by user to try to get something.  | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On April 19 2010 10:13 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Well it is sure good I didn't get gang raped early for inactivity. | ||
|
Jugan
United States1566 Posts
On April 19 2010 14:43 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Peoples ability to be a good TL member doesn't translate into mafia skill. Mafia skill translates into mafia skill. To be honest, I feel that a person that is able to think objectively or "practice what they preach" would be a very skillful mafia player. It just boggles my mind that such a great community member could generate in a discussion that they sparked so fast - the exception being that they're mafia, and don't know how to handle the situation (I totally understand that). | ||
|
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
WardiTV Weekly
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
Bombastic Starleague
Kung Fu Cup
OSC
CrankTV Team League
Bombastic Starleague
Replay Cast
The PondCast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
