• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:33
CEST 13:33
KST 20:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll6Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion Help: rep cant save ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 884 users

World at War Mafia

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 06 2010 17:27 GMT
#1980
I is here! I'll try to decide who to vote for after I've had a bit of time to read through the posts. As of now I guess it's between Nikon and Caller.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 06 2010 17:48 GMT
#1983
##vote: Nikon
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 06 2010 17:56 GMT
#1985
On April 07 2010 02:52 haster27 wrote:
Wait, citizen. Did you just replace infund?

Yup. China baby, whoo-hoo!
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 06 2010 18:12 GMT
#1990
On April 07 2010 03:08 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 07 2010 03:06 ~OpZ~ wrote:
...Nemy...I was defending you homie...

Why so defensive?

Haster even agreed. Which Inf was the one using hasters statement IN his long post detailing the actions of the thread.

Citizen, how does your ability work. You can retaliate, OR only nuke people that nuke you...


retaliate = nuking people that nuke you
no idea why you separate the two as if they are different

Right.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 06 2010 18:14 GMT
#1992
Yes, I've been trying to start with the summary posts, particularly anything Inf has been posting, since he's the one I can trust, for obvious reasons. I'll try to get a better grasp of this by late tonight.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 07 2010 02:17 GMT
#2002
On April 07 2010 10:47 Iaaan wrote:
looks like the town loses with tonight's hit. Doubt there is a 3rd faction. unless it happens to be 6:4 split, which i doubt.

Ace would presumably end the game if there was no mathematical way for one of the parties to win.

At least we lynched an anti-town player in Nikon I guess.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 07 2010 15:19 GMT
#2015
On April 07 2010 22:41 Fishball wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 07 2010 21:39 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On April 07 2010 13:15 Fishball wrote:
~Opz~, Abenson, what other powers do you have besides being able to talk in PM's and transferring nukes?

Can you elaborate more on the nuke transfer? How often can you use it? Is there a limit?


This would be something the Nuke stealer would like to know.

Who are you tracking tonight. And who is caller checking?

hopefully your following d3 and caller is checking Haster/LMNOP

But any rate, I'm voting Caller tomorrow. If japan is town aligned, Japan sucks.


Ok, let me change the question a bit. What makes you think the nuke stealer would target one of you two, a variable, instead of someone else that can't transfer, a constant? Hell, someone like China have 3 nukes just sitting there. Also, what makes you think your nuke(s) are so much more important than others?

This was a very odd exchange. I don't see why a pro-town player would seriously advocate ~OpZ~/Abenson post on the forum how often they can transfer their nukes. Then you try to deflect and start talking about why anyone would steal their nukes.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 07 2010 18:34 GMT
#2023
So... we lynch Caller now?
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 07 2010 18:41 GMT
#2026
Listen up, I am France, a Tracker. One of my abilities is to track who visited who at Night. I used this ability on Caller during Night.

Results: Caller visited Meeple last night. Meeple ended up dead.


##Vote Caller
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 07 2010 19:21 GMT
#2030
On April 08 2010 03:43 Caller wrote:
Okay, that does it guys:

I am actually Japan. I have no antinukes left, for the record, because I shot down the one that RoL launched at me. You may be wondering why I was acting all mysterious and suspicious throughout the entire fucking game. That's because I knew that if I claimed Japan and /or made myself not a lynch suspect, I would definitely get night hit and that means I wouldn't be able to figure out if I was insane or paranoid. Which, of course, means that my checks would turn up diddly squat and be completely useless.

We still got this:
Mafia KP is one per night. There clearly are no more than 4 mafia left. Therefore there have to be at least 5 townies. If we hit a mafia every night, we win. SK is dead so KP is down to one for lynch.

HOWEVER: I can now say that I am officially Insane.

Now consider:

I checked citi.zen last night and he came out town. That's right, town. Which means that I am insane and that therefore he is scum.

There's our lynch for today.

Last minute attempt to save face. Too bad you're not making any sense.

On the plus side, your post makes it 100% clear to me you're red, no need to second guess myself :-)
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 07 2010 19:31 GMT
#2031
A little gem from our "Japanese" friend, told to us after he visited meeple at night:

On April 01 2010 11:18 Caller wrote:
Well, gentlemen and woman, my idea of coming clean has been most rudely interrupted.

I am Israel, an Alignment Cop. The reason that I have barely said anything all game thus far is because any country's leader that opened their mouth died in a nuclear fire along with their many innocent civilians, as all can very clearly see. I didn't think there was any need at all for me to endanger my people's republic before my intelligence agency managed to get even one check off, so I figured the best thing to do was to say nothing. If people suspected my people of being conniving Mafia, then all the better, as by hiding among outsiders have the Jewish people survived for this long.

Basically, I have the ability to see whether or not someone is Innocent or Mafia.

I checked Nikon last night, because there were numerous suspicions among the people for his odd posting strategizations. But for some reason my checks had resulted in the determination of the role of meeple instead, and he, to my horror, was Mafia. I'm guessing that this odd switching of roles must have something to do with that blasted bus driver role that flamewheel had emplaced in his game.

I was initially going to reveal the people's will earlier today. But having saw that meeple was an ambiguous cop, I decided that it would be more effective for me to retreat and allow the intelligence agency to collect more datath. Firstly, if the Mossad were sane, that would give me result that meeple was in fact an innocent. The fact that he came out as a red scum implies that I am either insaneth or paranoidal.

He can't be allowed to get away with this yet another time - a missed lynch = game over. Rock the vote!
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 07 2010 20:10 GMT
#2038
I guess it's worth a shot to try to get out of this again, but it won't work. For the sake of going through the motions I'll answer you. Here we go:

Firstly, Infundibulum claims Paranoid Gun Owner. This is a very powerful role as it prevents people from visiting you at night without death. Now, because you want to draw mafia hits as it’s a free kill, in addition to preventing blues from being suspicious and checking you out, you take an active role in town discussion. Instead, both you and Infundibulum just kind of sat on your ass and only came out to defend yourself from allegations, otherwise you just kind of hmm de hmmed while other townies died.

The paranoid trait does not prevent anyone from visiting me at night. In fact your lies are so transparent it's sad: you yourself claimed you just visited me and I turned up town.

The other effect of Paranoid Gun Owner is that it’s a deterrent to all blues to visit you, including DTs . At this point in the game, I was like why the fuck not, check him out, it’s almost over anyways. The very fact that I’m still alive and came out with a check means that you cannot possibly be the Paranoid Gun Owner.

See above. As a paranoid gun owner I can nuke people who nuke me. I cannot deter people from visiting at night - as you (supposedly) should know.

Thirdly, your entire defense has been a by-the-book chainsaw defense (meaning you attack the other person instead of pleading your innocence). While this is not a hundred percent trustworthy, it can be a scumtell, especially when other people defend you in a similar fashion.

ROFL - but but but - I accused you first, right after Ace's update post. So if anything, YOU are trying out the "chainsaw defense". I think this is a generally a really bad "tell" - but this case it helps point out yet another failed argument in a magnificent post. Good job.

Fourthly, your posts have been “I need to catch up to the game and do reading, blah blah blah.” This may be valid but usually these posts are just an excuse for inactivity. If you’re innocent in general, and ESPECIALLY the Paranoid Gun Owner, you should just start firing away at everybody and hoping either you get mafia to slip up or you cause mafia to put a hit on you.

You again fail to understand my ability - see above.

As to the activity levels: I have read summary posts, and all of Fishball's posts, since I thought he was... fishy. After doing that, you came up as the main red contender. Pretty clear cut stuff, many others outlined the case. I said so after the day post above. I voted. I think I did my job. Can't speak for Inf, but from what I've seen he seemed to be doing a decent job as well.

You and Infundibulum have done neither, instead preferring to AFK your way to victory. This is a valid strat as paranoid gun owner to counter blue sniping. However, you don’t fucking CLAIM paranoid gunowner if you’re doing this strategy.

In other words:
a) Both of you contributed nothing
b) You have a way to deter night visitors through your claim
c) If you truly are Paranoid Gunowner then you are playing your role terribly and letting mafia blue snipe no problem. Why the fuck would you roleclaim that shit AND pretend to be a blue?
d) My check shows you as innocent and since I checked meeple (blue) as red, that means I am insane and you are red. And because I visited you and I’m still alive, you clearly cannot be the Paranoid Gunowner.

See my answers above - you are repeating illogical arguments. It ain't working - next time at least try to make sense.

And haster, your entire post is a great example of Mutual Chainsaw Defense (scumtell). Rather than show why citi.zen isn't scum because of his reasons, you attack me because "It's obvious that Caller is scum."
Really now?

For future reference: I have no idea what haster's alignment is, nor do I think there is a link between you/him/myself. In other words, I am not comfortable assuming he is green after your lynching.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 07 2010 20:13 GMT
#2039
On April 08 2010 05:03 Abenson wrote:
Alright, ~OpZ~ didn't die.
So... I think he is at work right now, but I want to release some of the PM's he sent me.
We feared that he would be the one to die today, and he sent me a bunch of things/thoughts for me to post if he had died.
I think i'll let ~OpZ~ himself explain, but if he's busy i'll just post the PM's

We need to think this out.

##NUKE: ~OpZ~

Eh? I can't wait for the explanation...
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 07 2010 23:56 GMT
#2046
LOL - this is getting funny.

Caller is weaving another complicated and incoherent story to get out being lynched. Remember how he made up a bus driver and claimed Israel after the (now dead and confirmed) tracker caught him visiting meeple the night he was killed. Now he is making up his own rules quoting other forums to justify his own idiotic words.

Look, lynch me if you want and lose the game already. Caller is so obviously red that you deserve to lose as a town if you can't see that at this point. Nothing left to say.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 01:58 GMT
#2049
On April 08 2010 09:27 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I think I've previously said my feelings on this. Want what are you talking about voting you out because you advocated Nikons death? I'm not voting you out, I'm voting citizen out. What kind of statement is that Haster? Are you citizen?

Terribly wording maybe, but I've done said you seem shady as fuck several times. Then citizen pops on backing everything you say? Making the same arguments? Honestly, Caller could damn well be red. I've made plenty of arguments to justify why he would be red. But I'm also severely suspect as you, and YOU ADDED TO MY OWN EVIDENCE AGAINST YOU, by saying the mafia role blocker MAY NOT BLOCK so one of his fellow MAFIA can claim to have been blocked.


So you think Haster is suspect, then promptly go on to vote for me. Good job.

Oh wait, it's because of the evidence:

Infundiblum...He's come and popped up being helpful and gets banned. I didn't like his role. It doesn't seem very town to me, but Xelin's screamed mafia too so who knows.. Great fucking timing


Rock solid.

BUT WAIT, there's more: Caller said he role-checked me at night, while at the same time claiming I can't be checked, err... have a role which deters checks because I can retaliate. Of course, Caller is still very much alive, there was no retaliation. As I've said many times before, the only thing China can do is nuke those who nuke it first. Not... you know... kill those who check it.

Let us not forget the final piece here: Caller's supposed check came out town, which must mean I am red, of course!

In summary: nothing Caller said made sense (surprise). Not only that, Caller is a serial liar, who visited meeple the night he was killed and tried to remove suspicions from himself inventing a bus-driver + role claiming Israel. Don't even get me started with the seesaw defense crap argument he brought up, or the quotations from another irrelevant forum. All that aside, Caller is red so it's OK for him to do everything he can to get out of being lynched. He is doing a decent to very good job.

On the other hand, OpZ buddy, you had better be red too. I know everyone thinks you are confirmed town, but if that really is the case this is just about the worst show I've seen in these mafia games.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 02:34 GMT
#2054
On April 08 2010 11:23 Iaaan wrote:
so, just my own little thoughts from my own point of view:

caller checked d3 and he showed up red. thus, if we believe that caller is town, we have to believe that d3 is town. so, with opz and abenson being confirmed as townies, and then myself, caller and d3 being townies to, that leaves jeejee haster lmnop and citizen as mafia.

Good argument. Please follow through and vote for me. At least it will end the game.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 02:59 GMT
#2060
On April 08 2010 11:39 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2010 10:58 citi.zen wrote:
On April 08 2010 09:27 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I think I've previously said my feelings on this. Want what are you talking about voting you out because you advocated Nikons death? I'm not voting you out, I'm voting citizen out. What kind of statement is that Haster? Are you citizen?

Terribly wording maybe, but I've done said you seem shady as fuck several times. Then citizen pops on backing everything you say? Making the same arguments? Honestly, Caller could damn well be red. I've made plenty of arguments to justify why he would be red. But I'm also severely suspect as you, and YOU ADDED TO MY OWN EVIDENCE AGAINST YOU, by saying the mafia role blocker MAY NOT BLOCK so one of his fellow MAFIA can claim to have been blocked.


So you think Haster is suspect, then promptly go on to vote for me. Good job.


Caller claiming Japan makes him EXTREMELY less scummy. Just saying...If he would of saved himself, then claimed Japan out in the open, mafia would of hit him. He would of seemed extremely more pro town. Meaning a higher chance the mafia would hit him.
Show nested quote +

BUT WAIT, there's more: Caller said he role-checked me at night, while at the same time claiming I can't be checked, err... have a role which deters checks because I can retaliate. Of course, Caller is still very much alive, there was no retaliation. As I've said many times before, the only thing China can do is nuke those who nuke it first. Not... you know... kill those who check it.

Because Infund false claimed? Obvious. Not that hard to see.
How would you deter the known cop to investigate you?
Claim townie or claim a blue that can't be checked. Haster/Infund
Show nested quote +

Let us not forget the final piece here: Caller's supposed check came out town, which must mean I am red, of course!

Insane Cop. Terrible argument, you need to reread the thread. Meeple came out red. D3 came out red
You came out Town. Meeple is confirmed, and D3 will be confirmed.

Here we go again: where has Infund ever claimed that a cop cannot check him? This is BS - the only thing I can do is nuke those who nuke me, as I've said multiple times. Do you want to find out? Nuke me! Please. Maybe we'll get a draw out of this.

Caller's insane cop claim is totally untrustworthy. He only made it up as a complicated cover to exonerate himself from killing meeple. Let me refresh your memory (btw awesome tip on the "read the thread" suggestion!):

On April 01 2010 10:35 Fishball wrote:
Ok. I'm off work, done dinner, and caught up with the thread.

First off, I want to point out my two top suspects besides Xelin. I would talk about Xelin later on.

Nikon, for trying to extend the day for the N'th time with his last minute nuke, against town consensus (duh), at an arguably lesser target based on general consensus, Zona.

Caller, lurking and laying low. Of course this alone wouldn't be enough for him to make the top of my list.

Listen up, I am France, a Tracker. One of my abilities is to track who visited who at Night. I used this ability on Caller during Night.

Results: Caller visited Meeple last night. Meeple ended up dead.

Pretty much self explanatory right here.

So Meeple and Amber was killed last night. We don't know if Mafia have more than one KP or not. If they do, the kills would easily make sense and Caller could very well be Mafia.

Let's assume Mafia only has 1 KP, and the other kill was from a Vigilante or the sort. Now Xelin pops out and says:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 14:16 XeliN wrote:
Also presumably a Vigilante type role used their ability to kill Meeple during the night

due to the reason:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 14:24 XeliN wrote:
The mafia has 1 KP during each and every night, 2 people have died, one specified "has been killed during the night" the other "has been found dead"

As far as I can tell that means someone town side has used an ability incorrectly, or possibly the mafia have a similar ability, but it doesn't make much sense for them to have night kill abilities as well as KP


Now, to me, this is just simply wording, and doesn't specifically means anything. A Mafia can also kill a target and the target would be "found dead" in the morning, no? Also, as mentioned in the thread, Amber was already suspected by some players, why would the Mafia hit him if this was the case? If a vigilante were to choose between Meeple and Amber, most likely it would be Amber. My point is, regardless of how much KP the Mafia has, Meeple is likely hit by a Mafia, and Caller took an action against Meeple last night. Meeple ended up dead.

Now, my ability only tells me who visited who at night, but doesn't tell me what the player did to the other player. Regardless, I'm 100% sure that Caller has a Night ability. Is he a Medic? Don't think so, as the Mafia would literally have to use 2 KP on Meeple to kill him. Is he a DT? Among so many "suspicious" players out there, what are the chances Meeple being checked? Coincidentally having Meeple die on the same night? Also, I consider my role like a mini-DT. Would there actually be a full DT role in this game? These are all hypothetical questions, but when you answer them all, the most likely scenario is that Caller is red and he killed Meeple.

One thing I don't understand is Xelin. His actions is like asking to be lynched, like the Village Idiot role pointed out by others already. I don't know what Xelin and Nikon have against Zona, as the majority of the players is obviously not seeing what they see, but after the Nikon stunt, Xelin has the guts to do the same thing, again, almost immediately (6 minutes) after the Night post. It doesn't matter if you are Mafia or Town, this move is just retarded.

If we put aside Xelin's "kill-me-please" plea, what should we do with Nikon and Caller? Nikon's move during Day is far more suspicious to me, and has yet to answer to his actions. Should town launch its first consensual nuke?


THEN Caller claimed Israel. When that story didn't work anymore he claimed Japan. I don't know what more "proof" you need. Like I said before, I get Caller's behavior, I just really hope you are also red and doing this on purpose.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 03:05 GMT
#2064
On April 08 2010 11:58 Caller wrote:

By the way citi.zen, your entire "Martyrdom" approach doesn't help your case at all. The last time people have tried this approach (capek and iaaan) they were both scummier than the bottom of a boat sitting in water too long. In fact I would've used this as rationale for lynching you without any of the incriminating evidence, because no innocent would EVER make this kind of self-immolation without some kind of ulterior motive, which you clearly don't have.

In fact, martyrdom is such a scumtell that I'm going to vote for you again.
##vote: citi.zen


Another excellent point - congrats! This from last game I played in:

On March 29 2010 00:58 citi.zen wrote:
I am not even sure where to start. There are only 2 reds, but far more people not making sense - meaning that pointing out inconsistencies will not help me get the mafia. Can't congratulate the mafia, this is primarily the town's own doing. So screw it, there is no more I can do here.

Go ahead and lynch me.

and...

On March 29 2010 10:23 citi.zen wrote:
Parting words, while I am still allowed to write them: don't let Ace get away with this. Don't buy his illogical "no vote" argument, and don't let him say "hey, YOU voted for citi.zen, I wanted RoL all along" - he was always going to switch if needed. This passing of the blame is exactly what he's done with Vivi - go back and read the posts.

GL town.

Of course, I was green in that game too. Comrade Caller is on a roll. Not only did he miss completely with the "seesaw defense" (since I actually attacked him first), now he clearly right about the "martyrdom" approach - such a sure scum-tell.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 03:09 GMT
#2065
In fact, in this game I'm allowed to vote for myself, so here:

##Vote citi.zen

GG town.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 05:01 GMT
#2070
Yeah really, where's that last vote? Or maybe a nuke? Please nuke me - OpZ and Caller told me I should search for trouble more, so i can use my power... so please nuke me! Worst case scenario we get a draw :-)
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 06:16 GMT
#2075
On April 08 2010 14:31 Elemenope wrote:
All I can say is:

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2010 12:09 citi.zen wrote:
In fact, in this game I'm allowed to vote for myself, so here:

##Vote citi.zen

GG town.



rage much?

I don't know who to put my vote on. On one hand, we have Caller who has been relatively inactive and seemingly full of scum. Yet with this claim and the night kills up until now, his action does seem to make sense. If he seemed like a viable lynch target, why would mafia bother to hit him if they can get the town to waste a lynch by lynching him? Unless someone wants to directly counter his claim with a Japan claim.

Then we have Citi.zen/infund who claimed Paranoid Gun Owner, but then says that the role consists solely of nuke-retaliation, which means the main point around the PGO ability has been taken out - hence, it shouldn't even be called PGO anymore.

I'm more leaning that citizen/infund were lying because of that role point. Nikon claimed Veteran, was caught in a lie, and he ended up anti-town. China's ability to launch only retaliation nukes doesn't even seem like a PGO claim at all, I don't see why infund/citizen would claim as such unless it was to avoid night checks which can make sense. The whole nuking thing just seems more of like a nuke restriction, similar to a post restrictions in other games: just to be a hindrance for the person.

I'll see what happens though for a bit since a nuke is in the air and we have a bit of time to mull things over.

You are also correct: everything makes sense except for Inf's role-claim. Meeple's death when Caller visited him was a coincidence, as were many other things Caller has since managed to perfectly explain by changing his story every day. Even his behavioral analysis was spot-on every time: I was trying to defend myself by accusing him, even though at that point there were no accusations on me. Not to mention the martyrdom - that's a clear sign of a mafia, as seen in prior games.

So don't bother thinking about any of that - it's cool, just vote. OpZ told you to, and he's confirmed town, right? Just do it - these guys are legit.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 06:23 GMT
#2076
On April 08 2010 15:01 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2010 14:31 Elemenope wrote:
All I can say is:

On April 08 2010 12:09 citi.zen wrote:
In fact, in this game I'm allowed to vote for myself, so here:

##Vote citi.zen

GG town.



rage much?

I don't know who to put my vote on. On one hand, we have Caller who has been relatively inactive and seemingly full of scum. Yet with this claim and the night kills up until now, his action does seem to make sense. If he seemed like a viable lynch target, why would mafia bother to hit him if they can get the town to waste a lynch by lynching him? Unless someone wants to directly counter his claim with a Japan claim.

Then we have Citi.zen/infund who claimed Paranoid Gun Owner, but then says that the role consists solely of nuke-retaliation, which means the main point around the PGO ability has been taken out - hence, it shouldn't even be called PGO anymore.

I'm more leaning that citizen/infund were lying because of that role point. Nikon claimed Veteran, was caught in a lie, and he ended up anti-town. China's ability to launch only retaliation nukes doesn't even seem like a PGO claim at all, I don't see why infund/citizen would claim as such unless it was to avoid night checks which can make sense. The whole nuking thing just seems more of like a nuke restriction, similar to a post restrictions in other games: just to be a hindrance for the person.

I'll see what happens though for a bit since a nuke is in the air and we have a bit of time to mull things over.

We're gonna have a few nukes in the air. I'm not letting the mafia weasel their way out and get Caller lynched. Haster and Citizen's arguments are complete shit. You, me, and even caller himself have pretty much decimated each of their arguments....It's a really pathetic attempt. Citizen will probably remove his vote.

I will extend until we have a majority. I am not dealing with one of these no lynch situations. I'd have Abenson vote and have it anti-nuked if I he were here.

I salute your air-tight logic. And I vote you for LVP. Unless you are red.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 12:00 GMT
#2082
On April 08 2010 17:19 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:
sorry about getting banned guys. apparently there was some rules post in a thread, which i missed because it was in the middle of some page and not bolded or anything. and thus i got upset at ignorance and broke the rules.

big thanks to citi for stepping up and substituting.

I guess the one piece of good news is you did not get modkilled. Good luck.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 15:01 GMT
#2086
You've been in this game too long and at this point your beliefs are based on faith, not reason. You will gobble up any incoherent story people you've decided to trust will spit out.

The good news is this will soon be over - we now have the votes for the lynching.

Have fun - next time maybe try to think for yourselves.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 15:03 GMT
#2087
On April 08 2010 23:55 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2010 21:00 citi.zen wrote:
On April 08 2010 17:19 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:
sorry about getting banned guys. apparently there was some rules post in a thread, which i missed because it was in the middle of some page and not bolded or anything. and thus i got upset at ignorance and broke the rules.

big thanks to citi for stepping up and substituting.

I guess the one piece of good news is you did not get modkilled. Good luck.


Wait am i playing again?

I am not sues it will be for long - these guys have decided to listen to Caller's claim that we came up green so must be red and lynch us. Plus, they don't believe the role changed compared to what Caller told them it was on mafiascum.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 15:03 GMT
#2088
sues = sure.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 15:12 GMT
#2090
Yeah, just got that PM. As I said, it won't matter, the votes are in, time to rejoice!
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 16:35 GMT
#2095
On April 09 2010 01:24 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2010 00:36 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Really? Damn...So add JeeJee to my vote for Citizen list...


of course i would vote for citi.zen
look at our track record, the one anti-town player we caught was because his role claim was inconsistent
nikon claiming vet -> nuke reflected -> wtf? -> lynch nikon -> anti-town
citi.zen claiming PGO -> no abilities -> wtf? -> lynch citi.zen -> ???

for the record citi.zen, if you're going to claim a special role in the future, at least make sure you say you have powers that a townie does not.

ROFL - I wasn't even playing when the claim was made, how ca I have been inconsistent? When I started to play and someone asked, I confirmed that I can only nuke those who nuke me. Thanks for paying attention.

Anyone want to nuke me? I can pretty much guarantee a draw.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 17:04 GMT
#2097
You Sir, are too smart for me.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 17:45 GMT
#2100
This is what you said:

for the record citi.zen, if you're going to claim a special role in the future, at least make sure you say you have powers that a townie does not.

I did not decide to claim anything in this game - I cam into a situation where my role had already been claimed. So thanks for the advice, but it is completely irrelevant.

You guys are too hung up on what you think the paranoid gun owner's powers are, instead of dealing with the serial liars in this game who got you into this messy situation. It is what it is, I don't know how to be any clearer than to tell you again Caller needs to be lynched after I flip China/paranoid gun owner - which will confirm for the nth time he does not have the role he claimed to have.

At the very least promise me you will keep that in mind, since right now you won't listen to reason.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 17:54 GMT
#2101
Also - after Caller is lynched be careful, don't accept too easily arguments as to who was for/against his lynching. Haster for example played in micromafia 1, where Ace told his mafia teammate to bandwagon against him and to defend me early on, to gain credibility. I have no clue if haster is red this time - just don't be too fast to believe he is innocent. Finally, be careful what you assume about the "confirmed" townies. Use reasoning not faith.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 18:51 GMT
#2103
Yup, and I stand by what I said. Just remember that after I flip town.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 19:05 GMT
#2105
Caller is mafia. You I think are just playing poorly but very likely town. The rest I don't not know with any certainty.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 19:18 GMT
#2108
On April 09 2010 04:16 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2010 04:05 citi.zen wrote:
Caller is mafia. You I think are just playing poorly but very likely town. The rest I don't not know with any certainty.

Gonna change your vote? Time's getting pretty close.

Not at all.

My death will demonstrate Caller is lying - since he said he role-checked me and is the insane cop. In fact, I would be suspicious of anyone changing their vote right now. This will offer you information, and perhaps the first confirmed red. My work here is done!
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 19:31 GMT
#2109
Here, for your benefit, a parting present:

On April 08 2010 03:43 Caller wrote:
Okay, that does it guys:

I am actually Japan. I have no antinukes left, for the record, because I shot down the one that RoL launched at me. You may be wondering why I was acting all mysterious and suspicious throughout the entire fucking game. That's because I knew that if I claimed Japan and /or made myself not a lynch suspect, I would definitely get night hit and that means I wouldn't be able to figure out if I was insane or paranoid. Which, of course, means that my checks would turn up diddly squat and be completely useless.

We still got this:
Mafia KP is one per night. There clearly are no more than 4 mafia left. Therefore there have to be at least 5 townies. If we hit a mafia every night, we win. SK is dead so KP is down to one for lynch.

HOWEVER: I can now say that I am officially Insane.

Now consider:

I checked citi.zen last night and he came out town. That's right, town. Which means that I am insane and that therefore he is scum.

There's our lynch for today.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 20:07 GMT
#2113
On April 09 2010 04:58 ~OpZ~ wrote:
##Vote Caller

Why are you trying to save Caller by trying to get a no lynch today? Please go back to voting for me to clear things for everyone.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 20:46 GMT
#2117
##VOTE: CALLER

Now we're getting somewhere.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 08 2010 22:21 GMT
#2128
On April 09 2010 06:41 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2010 06:28 haster27 wrote:
With ~OpZ~ and Abenson changing his opinion, JeeJee seems to be most detailed post arguing for citizen lynch. Let me rip his arguments to shreds.

Argument about vote counts
This argument also assumes that entire Mafia players chose to vote for one person three consecutive days. Seriously? I thought the most basic assumption about Mafia voting pattern was that they would try to avoid suspicion by spreading their votes as much as possible. Yes, they were all bandwagon votes, but RoL and Xelin bandwagon had so much steam going into it there was little reason for Mafia to all-in every time. Overall his repeated statement that four of us voted for same person over and over again is WIFOM.

Another specific flaw I found; JeeJee states that four of us created wagon against Nikon when only alternative lynch target was Caller- only for citizen and me to start Caller bandwagon very next day. What? If Caller also is Townie, why wouldn't we have followed the bandwagon suggested by confirmed Townie? Remember you said we are not following the bandwagon that has already formed, but started it. There must be motive for Mafia to start the bandwagon that goes against the argument of confirmed Townie, and therefore draw suspicion later on. If both Nikon and Caller is Townie, it is absolutely illogical for Mafia to continue their bandwagon against Nikon and Caller even when confirmed Townie is strongly arguing for alternative lynch target.

Argument against abilities
If Mafia - Caller in this case because he is certainly Mafia if citizen is innocent - intended to start bandwagon against citizen, they might easily could have chosen to keep their nuke-stealer in check to further incriminate him. Absense of nuke steal proves nothing.

I cannot even understand what you are arguing here. Citizen had his nuke stolen (because immobile three nukes are perfect nuke-stealer target), but cannot say it publicly because it proves his ability cannot NK the people visiting him? Um... didn't we get that verified when Caller claimed to have checked him? I feel like I did not completely understand your point here, so clarification is welcome.

Argument against setup
"all we know is that there isn't five mafia": your entire argument hinges on this argument being true. I can only see you thinking Caller/~OpZ~/Abenson/d3/yourself are Townies, because otherwise I cannot see why you would make such statement with confidence. Let me state this means nothing. If Caller is Mafia he and d3_crescentia are no longer confirmed Townie. If so it is still possible there are five Mafia present in the game. Also, you berate laaan for never "[considering] the point that there might not be four mafia, but less", but did anyone ever express an opinion that there might be less than three Mafia previous to your post?

I have to go momentarily for now, so I'll post my thought about JeeJee's remaining arguments later.

Where were you to further argue with me earlier? I would of preferred that. Honestly I have no idea which of you is mafia. Caller not being mafia pretty much hands the game over to town, right then and there. Almost everyone becomes confirmed. Sounds extremely nice. Now let's see if he's right.

Citizen voters and would-be voters:

Iaaan
LMNOP
Caller
JeeJee

I would like this to be noted.

I would also like it to be noted all who didn't cast their votes.
D3. Abenson, Haster, Myself, Citizen.

Let's see where this goes after Caller dies.

D3 cast your vote.

Actually I did vote.

On another note, read this bit:

You may be wondering why I was acting all mysterious and suspicious throughout the entire fucking game. That's because I knew that if I claimed Japan and /or made myself not a lynch suspect, I would definitely get night hit and that means I wouldn't be able to figure out if I was insane or paranoid.

So Caller didn't want to be a mafia target. Seems reasonable. Oh wait:

On April 01 2010 11:18 Caller wrote:
Well, gentlemen and woman, my idea of coming clean has been most rudely interrupted.

I am Israel, an Alignment Cop. The reason that I have barely said anything all game thus far is because any country's leader that opened their mouth died in a nuclear fire along with their many innocent civilians, as all can very clearly see. I didn't think there was any need at all for me to endanger my people's republic before my intelligence agency managed to get even one check off, so I figured the best thing to do was to say nothing. If people suspected my people of being conniving Mafia, then all the better, as by hiding among outsiders have the Jewish people survived for this long.

Take notes kids: the way to not make yourself a target is to fake-claim to be a cop!

Comrade Caller is no fool, da?
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 01:25 GMT
#2171
1. If you still believe Caller's "I had to lie so I won't get mafia hit so I claimed cop, of all things" claim you need to stop playing mafia. I'd love to hear Caller's defenders explain that one to me.

2. Caller lied repeatedly in this game. Some of you continue to defend him irrationally. I was willing to get lynched to get the lot of you revealed. I still am. Nuke or lynch me. Then lynch Caller and those making nonsensical arguments on his part.

3. A number of you keep pushing the fact that the PGO has the power to kill ANYONE who visits them at night. I repeatedly stated this is not the case. However, Caller et al apparently did not know this. So they did not attempt to steal China's nukes for fear of getting killed. They chose the lynching path instead.

4. I now see the retarded claim that "since nobody claimed Israel or Japan, Caller must be legit". Quite the opposite Sherlock: he can't be two countries at once, so at least one claim is wrong, pretty much proving that the lack of a counter-claim means very little in this game. We don't have a list of countries or roles. Yet you keep bringing this up again and again.

5. The same people who bring up #4 never once brought up the fact that nobody counter-claimed China. That defense apparently only applies to Comrade Caller, not me. Perhaps you'd care to tell us why that is.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 01:40 GMT
#2175
Yeah, what I need to do is talk more here. Me and Caller. Same boat, same thing, same quiet attitude.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 02:35 GMT
#2184
On April 09 2010 11:07 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2010 11:04 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On April 09 2010 11:02 JeeJee wrote:
On April 09 2010 10:56 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On April 09 2010 09:29 JeeJee wrote:
On April 09 2010 09:11 ~OpZ~ wrote:
JeeJee...The argument isn't the point. Ignore my vote for Caller. Ignore Abensons. I'm not discussing them. I've justified my intentions to him. Your claim rests on saying Infund/Citizen lied about their claims. Mine rests on Caller lying again.

You say infund/citizen lied multiple times? Caller has lied too.

For instance "Oh hai I'm israeli Cop, Meeples scum"

"Nah sike, I'm JAPAN"

"I don't have anyway of protecting myself from nukes!"

Honestly, Caller's lied about everything at least once. Country, Role, Anti-nukes. Role, MAYBE by a slight possibility he only INADVERTENTLY lied.


Oh I don't deny caller's claim is a clusterfuck of a situation in and of itself. I have stated this multiple times myself. But here's why I choose citizen over caller: citizen lied about his actual ROLE, whereas caller lied about his country and antinuke arsenal. As far as I know, what country you are has no bearing on anything, and lying about not having antinukes is a typical selfish move you can expect from any player of any alignment on day 1. There's much to be gained and nothing to be lost.

On the other hand, saying you're X role, but actually have Y powers, well, that makes sense in very few scenarios. For example claiming triggerhappy when you're actually DT will deter mafia from hitting you. Check. Claiming PGO when you're actually supposed to be a townie makes no sense. But, here's a scenario that does make sense: claiming PGO when you're actually mafia, thus deterring DTs from visiting you.

btw you mentioned caller has lied about his role. where was this? if this is actually true (i don't recall this off the top of my head but am ctrl+f'ing the thread right after this post) i may as well reconsider the whole thing because the one thing i held to so far is that at least caller hasn't lied about his actual role.

I posted my quote explaining WHY citizen would lie about his role. Then pointed out that Infund claimed PGO AFTER explaining he could only fire nukes as retaliation. Well after. Hunted the post down for you.

On the hand hand, there was a nuke stealer you are ignoring, that I posted about earlier. Check the nested quote, Haster's post fuck up, made mine stay hidden. I thanked him for posting MY QUOTE.

Caller didn't actually lie about his role, if you believe him to be DT. Inadvertently he may have lied is what I meant IF he is INFACT dt, by being Insane. No need to look.

(I addressed most of those points in the post I figured, and addressed them in another post)


you're not making any sense.
your answer to why citi.zen would lie about his ability to kill people at night is to draw a nuke steal, correct?
Here's the problem. He claims he has 3 nukes (enticing a nuke steal) but during the same day he claims PGO. If he wanted to entice a nuke steal, he should have waited with this claim until at least after the night, yes?

Many other points you are missing by the way.. should i repost them?

Yes please be my guest.

He claims it in the same day. I believe Caller should be posting and d3 damn sure needs to make his vote selection. I don't think he'll be on to change it, and this is a very important vote.


ok. before i do though, i want to make sure we're on the same page with this point (can't believe i'm arguing with a mason but anywho..)
you agree he claims it in the same day, great.
therefore, he did not intend to entice a nuke steal, correct?
then, what was the point of changing his claim? recall the circumstances: you FoS citizen, he replies with "I'm PGO". As a response to a FoS to deter DT followup on your FoS, this makes perfect sense. As a way to entice nuke steal it does not.
Are we on the same page here?

For the sake of clarity, these are the posts Infund made about our ability:

I can roleclam for you guys as well, though it's nothing exciting: I am China, pro-town, and have 3 nukes. However I am not allowed to nuke anyone unless they nuke me first.


And you said it yourself, the fact that you think my ability (named Paranoid Gun Owner, btw) "sounds" like a mafia ability doesn't mean squat.

And finally:


Clarification: I am only allowed to make retaliation strikes. Yeah, it would be awesome (kinda) to be able to nuke 3 people at once, but that's a no go.

Nothing about not being DT check-able or able to kill any night-time visitor. There was no "second" role claim and no attempt to deter anyone from checking us.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 02:42 GMT
#2186
By the way, since I took over I've also offered the same consistent explanation of my role, which I thought you fully understood judging by this post:

On April 07 2010 03:12 citi.zen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 07 2010 03:08 JeeJee wrote:
On April 07 2010 03:06 ~OpZ~ wrote:
...Nemy...I was defending you homie...

Why so defensive?

Haster even agreed. Which Inf was the one using hasters statement IN his long post detailing the actions of the thread.

Citizen, how does your ability work. You can retaliate, OR only nuke people that nuke you...


retaliate = nuking people that nuke you
no idea why you separate the two as if they are different

Right.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 03:58 GMT
#2196
On April 09 2010 12:25 JeeJee wrote:
sorry, it seems i have missed communicating one very important point.

we have confirmation that citizen lied. we do NOT have confirmation that caller lied (at least not yet). This is what boggles me the most here, that we are voting for a 'maybe' over a 'for sure'.

let me elaborate -- citizen claims his ability is to counter nukes. Then he claims his ability is PGO. One of these is a lie. We know this. You bring up the point that he may have left out the piece about killing@night because he wanted to entice a nuke steal. I pointed out how this cannot be the case because he did not wait for night post before he changed his claim.

also
Show nested quote +
True...Citizen would of done better claiming his nukes were stolen. Smart boy, smart boy....


actually i believe this would paint him in an even worse light if it were possible -- after his claim of PGO, someone presumably visits him at night and does not die. This would just mean another lie.

Townies have no reason to do the lies that citizen has made. The ONLY reason that I can see, you have outlined: enticing a nuke steal. However, the events that transpired after rule out this possibility completely. In fact, they actually fit in very well with a mafia choosing to claim PGO in order to stop your FoS from becoming a reality. maybe you actually nabbed a mafia there and caused him to panic?

oh and finally, one nuke was stolen from me

also, re: this latest replacement, i guess this means waiting for a d3 modkill isn't an option, so we are back to discussing citizen vs caller. i'm trying my hardest to explain my position, and i'm pretty sure my judgment is correct here.

No - you do not know I lied. You assume it, based on what you think the definition of the paranoid gun owner is in some other game.

Read every post myself or Inf made - we never claimed to have the ability to hit any night checker. Ever. Had we intended the role claim to be a deterrent for a DT you think we might have mentioned that part, no?

Also, you claim you do not know Caller lied yet? So you think he is both Israel and Japan? And you find it rational for him to claim DT to "stay low and not be a mafia target"? Please explain to me how this laying low business works - I thought the mafia wants to kill DTs, no?

The longer this is going on the more I think you are red. A rational person would not miss these simple facts and constantly try to distort them.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 04:38 GMT
#2199
On April 09 2010 13:31 Iaaan wrote:
anyone considered lynching haster or LMNOP? (:

afk more sorry I can't be more active

##vote citizen because people who are probably townies are voting for him and they probably need my vote ^^

You already voted for me and your vote still counts.

Thanks for the new arguments though. Are you saying Caller is likely town but Abenson and OpZ are not? Which people are we talking about exactly?
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 13:22 GMT
#2210
On April 09 2010 22:08 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2010 12:58 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 12:25 JeeJee wrote:
sorry, it seems i have missed communicating one very important point.

we have confirmation that citizen lied. we do NOT have confirmation that caller lied (at least not yet). This is what boggles me the most here, that we are voting for a 'maybe' over a 'for sure'.

let me elaborate -- citizen claims his ability is to counter nukes. Then he claims his ability is PGO. One of these is a lie. We know this. You bring up the point that he may have left out the piece about killing@night because he wanted to entice a nuke steal. I pointed out how this cannot be the case because he did not wait for night post before he changed his claim.

also
True...Citizen would of done better claiming his nukes were stolen. Smart boy, smart boy....


actually i believe this would paint him in an even worse light if it were possible -- after his claim of PGO, someone presumably visits him at night and does not die. This would just mean another lie.

Townies have no reason to do the lies that citizen has made. The ONLY reason that I can see, you have outlined: enticing a nuke steal. However, the events that transpired after rule out this possibility completely. In fact, they actually fit in very well with a mafia choosing to claim PGO in order to stop your FoS from becoming a reality. maybe you actually nabbed a mafia there and caused him to panic?

oh and finally, one nuke was stolen from me

also, re: this latest replacement, i guess this means waiting for a d3 modkill isn't an option, so we are back to discussing citizen vs caller. i'm trying my hardest to explain my position, and i'm pretty sure my judgment is correct here.

No - you do not know I lied. You assume it, based on what you think the definition of the paranoid gun owner is in some other game.

Read every post myself or Inf made - we never claimed to have the ability to hit any night checker. Ever. Had we intended the role claim to be a deterrent for a DT you think we might have mentioned that part, no?

Also, you claim you do not know Caller lied yet? So you think he is both Israel and Japan? And you find it rational for him to claim DT to "stay low and not be a mafia target"? Please explain to me how this laying low business works - I thought the mafia wants to kill DTs, no?

The longer this is going on the more I think you are red. A rational person would not miss these simple facts and constantly try to distort them.


reading the thread will prevent posts like these i'm afraid
but as long as we're absolutely clear, i will adress this too, although I really shouldn't have to. However, at this time, nobody can afford being misinformed so I will lay this out too.

first of all, understand the context in which this post was made. me and opz were debating about caller, and i had fully addressed my suspicions of his lies about his anti nuke arsenal as well as his country. would you like me to pull up the post? after this was taken into account, i stated, as I am stating here again, that the main reason I suspect you over caller is because you lied about your role whereas caller did not. (at this point actually opz brought up that caller may have in fact lied about his role too, but upon further inspection this was not the case -- if it were, my entire position would have to be rethought. I have already said many times caller's claim is sketchy and I would lynch him in an instant UNTIL you showed up. This is very important which is why I'm stating it for the umpteenth time so we're all on the same page here)


The other bit about the PGO -- it is an assumption, and a perfectly valid one. Just as a vigi kills at night, so does a PGO kill his visitors. It is what the role is about. It's not just mafia scum. Every single mafia site agrees.

ECNet:
http://wiki.ecnet.org/wiki/Mafia
Show nested quote +
Paranoid gun owner – If the paranoid gun owner is targeted at night for anything, whether it's a kill, investigation, or even protection, the paranoid gun owner must kill whomever targeted him


Neoseeker
http://wikiguides.neoseeker.com/wiki/The_Mafia_Game/Army_Veteran
Show nested quote +
Perhaps a role used more frequently than the Army Veteran role, a Paranoid Gun Owner will automatically kill anyone that targets them at night for any reason, whether positive or negative.


Mafiascum
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Paranoid_Gun_Owner
Show nested quote +
The Paranoid Gun Owner, similar to the Army Veteran, involuntarily kills anyone who targets him during the night, regardless of alignment. He can be a liability to the Town for this reason, as he indiscriminately kills Cops, Doctors, etc.


Would you like me to keep going?
This isn't a matter of opinion. You lied about your role.

Your entire argument is based on the belief that Infund lied when he mentioned the name Ace gave to his ability. It's impossible for me to justify something Ace did - he defined people's roles as he saw fit in this game.

At the very least admit that neither me nor Infund explicitly claimed to have the ability to kill any night visitors. All we claimed, consistently, was to have the ability to retaliate. There was no explicit attempt to deter any DT from role-checking.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 15:24 GMT
#2228
On April 09 2010 22:33 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2010 22:22 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 22:08 JeeJee wrote:
On April 09 2010 12:58 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 12:25 JeeJee wrote:
sorry, it seems i have missed communicating one very important point.

we have confirmation that citizen lied. we do NOT have confirmation that caller lied (at least not yet). This is what boggles me the most here, that we are voting for a 'maybe' over a 'for sure'.

let me elaborate -- citizen claims his ability is to counter nukes. Then he claims his ability is PGO. One of these is a lie. We know this. You bring up the point that he may have left out the piece about killing@night because he wanted to entice a nuke steal. I pointed out how this cannot be the case because he did not wait for night post before he changed his claim.

also
True...Citizen would of done better claiming his nukes were stolen. Smart boy, smart boy....


actually i believe this would paint him in an even worse light if it were possible -- after his claim of PGO, someone presumably visits him at night and does not die. This would just mean another lie.

Townies have no reason to do the lies that citizen has made. The ONLY reason that I can see, you have outlined: enticing a nuke steal. However, the events that transpired after rule out this possibility completely. In fact, they actually fit in very well with a mafia choosing to claim PGO in order to stop your FoS from becoming a reality. maybe you actually nabbed a mafia there and caused him to panic?

oh and finally, one nuke was stolen from me

also, re: this latest replacement, i guess this means waiting for a d3 modkill isn't an option, so we are back to discussing citizen vs caller. i'm trying my hardest to explain my position, and i'm pretty sure my judgment is correct here.

No - you do not know I lied. You assume it, based on what you think the definition of the paranoid gun owner is in some other game.

Read every post myself or Inf made - we never claimed to have the ability to hit any night checker. Ever. Had we intended the role claim to be a deterrent for a DT you think we might have mentioned that part, no?

Also, you claim you do not know Caller lied yet? So you think he is both Israel and Japan? And you find it rational for him to claim DT to "stay low and not be a mafia target"? Please explain to me how this laying low business works - I thought the mafia wants to kill DTs, no?

The longer this is going on the more I think you are red. A rational person would not miss these simple facts and constantly try to distort them.


reading the thread will prevent posts like these i'm afraid
but as long as we're absolutely clear, i will adress this too, although I really shouldn't have to. However, at this time, nobody can afford being misinformed so I will lay this out too.

first of all, understand the context in which this post was made. me and opz were debating about caller, and i had fully addressed my suspicions of his lies about his anti nuke arsenal as well as his country. would you like me to pull up the post? after this was taken into account, i stated, as I am stating here again, that the main reason I suspect you over caller is because you lied about your role whereas caller did not. (at this point actually opz brought up that caller may have in fact lied about his role too, but upon further inspection this was not the case -- if it were, my entire position would have to be rethought. I have already said many times caller's claim is sketchy and I would lynch him in an instant UNTIL you showed up. This is very important which is why I'm stating it for the umpteenth time so we're all on the same page here)


The other bit about the PGO -- it is an assumption, and a perfectly valid one. Just as a vigi kills at night, so does a PGO kill his visitors. It is what the role is about. It's not just mafia scum. Every single mafia site agrees.

ECNet:
http://wiki.ecnet.org/wiki/Mafia
Paranoid gun owner – If the paranoid gun owner is targeted at night for anything, whether it's a kill, investigation, or even protection, the paranoid gun owner must kill whomever targeted him


Neoseeker
http://wikiguides.neoseeker.com/wiki/The_Mafia_Game/Army_Veteran
Perhaps a role used more frequently than the Army Veteran role, a Paranoid Gun Owner will automatically kill anyone that targets them at night for any reason, whether positive or negative.


Mafiascum
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Paranoid_Gun_Owner
The Paranoid Gun Owner, similar to the Army Veteran, involuntarily kills anyone who targets him during the night, regardless of alignment. He can be a liability to the Town for this reason, as he indiscriminately kills Cops, Doctors, etc.


Would you like me to keep going?
This isn't a matter of opinion. You lied about your role.

Your entire argument is based on the belief that Infund lied when he mentioned the name Ace gave to his ability. It's impossible for me to justify something Ace did - he defined people's roles as he saw fit in this game.

At the very least admit that neither me nor Infund explicitly claimed to have the ability to kill any night visitors. All we claimed, consistently, was to have the ability to retaliate. There was no explicit attempt to deter any DT from role-checking.


I disagree. if I were to claim vigilante, I don't have to specifically claim that my role is killing people at night. There may be game-specific restrictions like I cannot kill on the first night, or can only kill twice or whatever, but either way I can kill people at night.
Likewise for PGO -- by stating you are PGO, you are explicitly claiming your ability to kill any night visitor indiscriminately. maybe the restriction is you can only do it once then revert to townie (a popular variation) but the underlying mechanics is always there.

as a sidenote to opz -- i have only been skimming you versus lmnop for the reason that if my judgment is correct here, there is at least one mafia between lmnop/iaaan, and very likely both of them are. am i reading this correctly, did he accuse you of being mafia?

The vigilante comparison is not entirely fair, but yes, in the end I wish Ace would have chosen a different name for my ability. In the end it would be quite unfortunate it the town lost because of it.

On another note - you continue to say Caller is being consistent. Please explain how his his claim that he was trying not to be a mafia target and lay low squares with claiming to be a cop, twice. Why did he think that would make him less of a target?
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 15:40 GMT
#2234
Anyway I guess the game ends today. I'm not extending again, and no lynch = mafia win. GG guys. I'm going to work at 12. And I said that last night. Choke.

Wait, don't we have the votes for Caller already? Can we get an official count?
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 15:43 GMT
#2236
On April 10 2010 00:37 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2010 00:24 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 22:33 JeeJee wrote:
On April 09 2010 22:22 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 22:08 JeeJee wrote:
On April 09 2010 12:58 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 12:25 JeeJee wrote:
sorry, it seems i have missed communicating one very important point.

we have confirmation that citizen lied. we do NOT have confirmation that caller lied (at least not yet). This is what boggles me the most here, that we are voting for a 'maybe' over a 'for sure'.

let me elaborate -- citizen claims his ability is to counter nukes. Then he claims his ability is PGO. One of these is a lie. We know this. You bring up the point that he may have left out the piece about killing@night because he wanted to entice a nuke steal. I pointed out how this cannot be the case because he did not wait for night post before he changed his claim.

also
True...Citizen would of done better claiming his nukes were stolen. Smart boy, smart boy....


actually i believe this would paint him in an even worse light if it were possible -- after his claim of PGO, someone presumably visits him at night and does not die. This would just mean another lie.

Townies have no reason to do the lies that citizen has made. The ONLY reason that I can see, you have outlined: enticing a nuke steal. However, the events that transpired after rule out this possibility completely. In fact, they actually fit in very well with a mafia choosing to claim PGO in order to stop your FoS from becoming a reality. maybe you actually nabbed a mafia there and caused him to panic?

oh and finally, one nuke was stolen from me

also, re: this latest replacement, i guess this means waiting for a d3 modkill isn't an option, so we are back to discussing citizen vs caller. i'm trying my hardest to explain my position, and i'm pretty sure my judgment is correct here.

No - you do not know I lied. You assume it, based on what you think the definition of the paranoid gun owner is in some other game.

Read every post myself or Inf made - we never claimed to have the ability to hit any night checker. Ever. Had we intended the role claim to be a deterrent for a DT you think we might have mentioned that part, no?

Also, you claim you do not know Caller lied yet? So you think he is both Israel and Japan? And you find it rational for him to claim DT to "stay low and not be a mafia target"? Please explain to me how this laying low business works - I thought the mafia wants to kill DTs, no?

The longer this is going on the more I think you are red. A rational person would not miss these simple facts and constantly try to distort them.


reading the thread will prevent posts like these i'm afraid
but as long as we're absolutely clear, i will adress this too, although I really shouldn't have to. However, at this time, nobody can afford being misinformed so I will lay this out too.

first of all, understand the context in which this post was made. me and opz were debating about caller, and i had fully addressed my suspicions of his lies about his anti nuke arsenal as well as his country. would you like me to pull up the post? after this was taken into account, i stated, as I am stating here again, that the main reason I suspect you over caller is because you lied about your role whereas caller did not. (at this point actually opz brought up that caller may have in fact lied about his role too, but upon further inspection this was not the case -- if it were, my entire position would have to be rethought. I have already said many times caller's claim is sketchy and I would lynch him in an instant UNTIL you showed up. This is very important which is why I'm stating it for the umpteenth time so we're all on the same page here)


The other bit about the PGO -- it is an assumption, and a perfectly valid one. Just as a vigi kills at night, so does a PGO kill his visitors. It is what the role is about. It's not just mafia scum. Every single mafia site agrees.

ECNet:
http://wiki.ecnet.org/wiki/Mafia
Paranoid gun owner – If the paranoid gun owner is targeted at night for anything, whether it's a kill, investigation, or even protection, the paranoid gun owner must kill whomever targeted him


Neoseeker
http://wikiguides.neoseeker.com/wiki/The_Mafia_Game/Army_Veteran
Perhaps a role used more frequently than the Army Veteran role, a Paranoid Gun Owner will automatically kill anyone that targets them at night for any reason, whether positive or negative.


Mafiascum
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Paranoid_Gun_Owner
The Paranoid Gun Owner, similar to the Army Veteran, involuntarily kills anyone who targets him during the night, regardless of alignment. He can be a liability to the Town for this reason, as he indiscriminately kills Cops, Doctors, etc.


Would you like me to keep going?
This isn't a matter of opinion. You lied about your role.

Your entire argument is based on the belief that Infund lied when he mentioned the name Ace gave to his ability. It's impossible for me to justify something Ace did - he defined people's roles as he saw fit in this game.

At the very least admit that neither me nor Infund explicitly claimed to have the ability to kill any night visitors. All we claimed, consistently, was to have the ability to retaliate. There was no explicit attempt to deter any DT from role-checking.


I disagree. if I were to claim vigilante, I don't have to specifically claim that my role is killing people at night. There may be game-specific restrictions like I cannot kill on the first night, or can only kill twice or whatever, but either way I can kill people at night.
Likewise for PGO -- by stating you are PGO, you are explicitly claiming your ability to kill any night visitor indiscriminately. maybe the restriction is you can only do it once then revert to townie (a popular variation) but the underlying mechanics is always there.

as a sidenote to opz -- i have only been skimming you versus lmnop for the reason that if my judgment is correct here, there is at least one mafia between lmnop/iaaan, and very likely both of them are. am i reading this correctly, did he accuse you of being mafia?

The vigilante comparison is not entirely fair, but yes, in the end I wish Ace would have chosen a different name for my ability. In the end it would be quite unfortunate it the town lost because of it.

On another note - you continue to say Caller is being consistent. Please explain how his his claim that he was trying not to be a mafia target and lay low squares with claiming to be a cop, twice. Why did he think that would make him less of a target?


to be fair, i'm not saying caller is being consistent. I'm saying he's the lesser of the 2 evils because at least he hasn't provably lied about his role in a way that doesn't make sense for a townie but does make sense for a mafia trying to dodge a FoS placed by opz
or, would you like to pull up my relevant posts so that i may have a clearer idea of what you mean by saying "you keep saying caller is being consistent"?
like i said, nobody can afford being misinformed here

How does it make sense for a townie to claim Cop so as not to be a mafia target? This only makes sense for a red - since they are not afraid to be killed at night.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 15:45 GMT
#2237
On April 10 2010 00:43 ~OpZ~ wrote:
##Vote Elemenope

He is mafia by numbers.

If Caller is truthful, Elemenope can't be mafia unless their is three mafia, and we continue to accept JeeJee as Town. Remember, Caller "checked" D3.
Abenson, Myself, Caller, D3, JeeJee
If Haster and Citizen are right
Citizen, Haster, Abenson, Me, JeeJee

Otherwise we are not in a lylo situation and can be wrong.

We have the damn votes, why are you saving Caller? Don't let LMNOP distract you - wtf.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 15:47 GMT
#2239
By the way OpZ - we get the same information by lynching Caller. In your own own words we need a lynching tonight. I don't understand your vote switch at all.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 15:50 GMT
#2240
On April 10 2010 00:47 JeeJee wrote:
yeah i'm ignoring it on purpose. what value would it have here? pretty sure the only reason i'm alive is because I hinted I am triggerhappy or hatter type role. whether I am that role or plain jane or even something random like a medic, doesn't affect my logic and shouldn't affect your decision making with respect to said logic. remember, if we are in 5-4, we will be in lylo for the next four days, not just today assuming no extra kp. if mafia want me to shut up, i'd rather have them debate about it.


Is this in relation to Caller's cop claim? What are you replying to?
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 16:03 GMT
#2246
On April 10 2010 00:57 ~OpZ~ wrote:
"as a sidenote to opz -- i have only been skimming you versus lmnop for the reason that if my judgment is correct here, there is at least one mafia between lmnop/iaaan, and very likely both of them are. am i reading this correctly, did he accuse you of being mafia?"

Good, then you don't mind lynching LMNOP with me?

Citizen, we need 5 votes for the majority, not 4. And if lynching LMNOP will convince JeeJee, I'm fine with it. I've done explained he can't possibly be town no matter what if this is Lylo

The only problem is this: I am 100% sure Caller is lying, since he claimed to have confirmed me as a red, which I obviously know I am not; I was and still am comfortable getting lynched myself to give the town indisputable information about Caller and his fake claims.

LMNOP I cannot be certain of. Probable perhaps, but far from certain in my book.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 16:08 GMT
#2248
The math is this: Caller is 100% lying. Look, there are still some votes for me. Why don't you vote for me again, see what color I turn tonight and settle this one way or another. I'll vote for myself again to help the count. Then lynch Caller if the game is still going. It beats a no-lynch, at least you have clear information.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 16:13 GMT
#2249
A vote-count would still be nice.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 16:28 GMT
#2251
On April 10 2010 01:20 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2010 23:55 JeeJee wrote:
to be fair i haven't gotten your clear stance on citizen's roleclaim lie. what do you make of it? at least answer this; i have done my best to explain my position as clearnly as possible.


this still stands unanswered by opz, which irks me the most because this is what i base my whole argument on citizen's lynch about.
it has been standing unanswered this entire time, even after i started ignoring all of my other points/queries in an effort to get your official stance on this one so there is no confusion with other points, yet somehow this still remains unanswered.
please please PLEASE answer this. give me your official statement here. I have done my best to answer every single thing about my position and i believe i have done so. please return the favor by answering this one thing

Well, your argument is actually two pronged: you point out my role seems inconsistent with your view of the PGO. You also say this is more inconsistent than Caller's play, and that my claim only makes sense for a red, not a townies, as opposed to Caller's claims. You thus want to vote for me instead of him.

Keeping this in mind, please answer this bit:

On April 10 2010 00:43 citi.zen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2010 00:37 JeeJee wrote:
On April 10 2010 00:24 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 22:33 JeeJee wrote:
On April 09 2010 22:22 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 22:08 JeeJee wrote:
On April 09 2010 12:58 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 12:25 JeeJee wrote:
sorry, it seems i have missed communicating one very important point.

we have confirmation that citizen lied. we do NOT have confirmation that caller lied (at least not yet). This is what boggles me the most here, that we are voting for a 'maybe' over a 'for sure'.

let me elaborate -- citizen claims his ability is to counter nukes. Then he claims his ability is PGO. One of these is a lie. We know this. You bring up the point that he may have left out the piece about killing@night because he wanted to entice a nuke steal. I pointed out how this cannot be the case because he did not wait for night post before he changed his claim.

also
True...Citizen would of done better claiming his nukes were stolen. Smart boy, smart boy....


actually i believe this would paint him in an even worse light if it were possible -- after his claim of PGO, someone presumably visits him at night and does not die. This would just mean another lie.

Townies have no reason to do the lies that citizen has made. The ONLY reason that I can see, you have outlined: enticing a nuke steal. However, the events that transpired after rule out this possibility completely. In fact, they actually fit in very well with a mafia choosing to claim PGO in order to stop your FoS from becoming a reality. maybe you actually nabbed a mafia there and caused him to panic?

oh and finally, one nuke was stolen from me

also, re: this latest replacement, i guess this means waiting for a d3 modkill isn't an option, so we are back to discussing citizen vs caller. i'm trying my hardest to explain my position, and i'm pretty sure my judgment is correct here.

No - you do not know I lied. You assume it, based on what you think the definition of the paranoid gun owner is in some other game.

Read every post myself or Inf made - we never claimed to have the ability to hit any night checker. Ever. Had we intended the role claim to be a deterrent for a DT you think we might have mentioned that part, no?

Also, you claim you do not know Caller lied yet? So you think he is both Israel and Japan? And you find it rational for him to claim DT to "stay low and not be a mafia target"? Please explain to me how this laying low business works - I thought the mafia wants to kill DTs, no?

The longer this is going on the more I think you are red. A rational person would not miss these simple facts and constantly try to distort them.


reading the thread will prevent posts like these i'm afraid
but as long as we're absolutely clear, i will adress this too, although I really shouldn't have to. However, at this time, nobody can afford being misinformed so I will lay this out too.

first of all, understand the context in which this post was made. me and opz were debating about caller, and i had fully addressed my suspicions of his lies about his anti nuke arsenal as well as his country. would you like me to pull up the post? after this was taken into account, i stated, as I am stating here again, that the main reason I suspect you over caller is because you lied about your role whereas caller did not. (at this point actually opz brought up that caller may have in fact lied about his role too, but upon further inspection this was not the case -- if it were, my entire position would have to be rethought. I have already said many times caller's claim is sketchy and I would lynch him in an instant UNTIL you showed up. This is very important which is why I'm stating it for the umpteenth time so we're all on the same page here)


The other bit about the PGO -- it is an assumption, and a perfectly valid one. Just as a vigi kills at night, so does a PGO kill his visitors. It is what the role is about. It's not just mafia scum. Every single mafia site agrees.

ECNet:
http://wiki.ecnet.org/wiki/Mafia
Paranoid gun owner – If the paranoid gun owner is targeted at night for anything, whether it's a kill, investigation, or even protection, the paranoid gun owner must kill whomever targeted him


Neoseeker
http://wikiguides.neoseeker.com/wiki/The_Mafia_Game/Army_Veteran
Perhaps a role used more frequently than the Army Veteran role, a Paranoid Gun Owner will automatically kill anyone that targets them at night for any reason, whether positive or negative.


Mafiascum
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Paranoid_Gun_Owner
The Paranoid Gun Owner, similar to the Army Veteran, involuntarily kills anyone who targets him during the night, regardless of alignment. He can be a liability to the Town for this reason, as he indiscriminately kills Cops, Doctors, etc.


Would you like me to keep going?
This isn't a matter of opinion. You lied about your role.

Your entire argument is based on the belief that Infund lied when he mentioned the name Ace gave to his ability. It's impossible for me to justify something Ace did - he defined people's roles as he saw fit in this game.

At the very least admit that neither me nor Infund explicitly claimed to have the ability to kill any night visitors. All we claimed, consistently, was to have the ability to retaliate. There was no explicit attempt to deter any DT from role-checking.


I disagree. if I were to claim vigilante, I don't have to specifically claim that my role is killing people at night. There may be game-specific restrictions like I cannot kill on the first night, or can only kill twice or whatever, but either way I can kill people at night.
Likewise for PGO -- by stating you are PGO, you are explicitly claiming your ability to kill any night visitor indiscriminately. maybe the restriction is you can only do it once then revert to townie (a popular variation) but the underlying mechanics is always there.

as a sidenote to opz -- i have only been skimming you versus lmnop for the reason that if my judgment is correct here, there is at least one mafia between lmnop/iaaan, and very likely both of them are. am i reading this correctly, did he accuse you of being mafia?

The vigilante comparison is not entirely fair, but yes, in the end I wish Ace would have chosen a different name for my ability. In the end it would be quite unfortunate it the town lost because of it.

On another note - you continue to say Caller is being consistent. Please explain how his his claim that he was trying not to be a mafia target and lay low squares with claiming to be a cop, twice. Why did he think that would make him less of a target?


to be fair, i'm not saying caller is being consistent. I'm saying he's the lesser of the 2 evils because at least he hasn't provably lied about his role in a way that doesn't make sense for a townie but does make sense for a mafia trying to dodge a FoS placed by opz
or, would you like to pull up my relevant posts so that i may have a clearer idea of what you mean by saying "you keep saying caller is being consistent"?
like i said, nobody can afford being misinformed here

How does it make sense for a townie to claim Cop so as not to be a mafia target? This only makes sense for a red - since they are not afraid to be killed at night.

Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 17:25 GMT
#2258
Note to self - this guy love lightning.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 18:40 GMT
#2263
I can't believe you guys are still not seeing that Caller is red. It's beyond me how he can have you believe one lie after another after another simply by changing his story after any new suspicion is shed on him.

Look at micro-mafia 1. I was in the same situation with Ace there. I was right there too. Of course, being right doesn't matter if you can't persuade others, so I guess I fail and Caller wins. Too bad for the town. Sorry, I am out of patience.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 20:00 GMT
#2273
##VOTE: Elemenope

This lynching is not the one I want. JeeJee is right about one thing: when we have a confirmed liar we should vote them off. We disagree on who that is, and JeeJee's unwillingness to acknowledge Caller is at least as suspect and Inf/myself worries me and should be noted for future reference.

At the end of the day I would favor lynching me or Caller over Elemenope. Get the votes for either and I shall join you.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 20:10 GMT
#2277
On April 10 2010 04:57 JeeJee wrote:
FUCK INTERNET LAGGINGP OST ALRDY

Show nested quote +
On April 10 2010 01:28 citi.zen wrote:
On April 10 2010 01:20 JeeJee wrote:
On April 09 2010 23:55 JeeJee wrote:
to be fair i haven't gotten your clear stance on citizen's roleclaim lie. what do you make of it? at least answer this; i have done my best to explain my position as clearnly as possible.


this still stands unanswered by opz, which irks me the most because this is what i base my whole argument on citizen's lynch about.
it has been standing unanswered this entire time, even after i started ignoring all of my other points/queries in an effort to get your official stance on this one so there is no confusion with other points, yet somehow this still remains unanswered.
please please PLEASE answer this. give me your official statement here. I have done my best to answer every single thing about my position and i believe i have done so. please return the favor by answering this one thing

Well, your argument is actually two pronged: you point out my role seems inconsistent with your view of the PGO. You also say this is more inconsistent than Caller's play, and that my claim only makes sense for a red, not a townies, as opposed to Caller's claims. You thus want to vote for me instead of him.

Keeping this in mind, please answer this bit:

On April 10 2010 00:43 citi.zen wrote:
On April 10 2010 00:37 JeeJee wrote:
On April 10 2010 00:24 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 22:33 JeeJee wrote:
On April 09 2010 22:22 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 22:08 JeeJee wrote:
On April 09 2010 12:58 citi.zen wrote:
On April 09 2010 12:25 JeeJee wrote:
sorry, it seems i have missed communicating one very important point.

we have confirmation that citizen lied. we do NOT have confirmation that caller lied (at least not yet). This is what boggles me the most here, that we are voting for a 'maybe' over a 'for sure'.

let me elaborate -- citizen claims his ability is to counter nukes. Then he claims his ability is PGO. One of these is a lie. We know this. You bring up the point that he may have left out the piece about killing@night because he wanted to entice a nuke steal. I pointed out how this cannot be the case because he did not wait for night post before he changed his claim.

also
[quote]

actually i believe this would paint him in an even worse light if it were possible -- after his claim of PGO, someone presumably visits him at night and does not die. This would just mean another lie.

Townies have no reason to do the lies that citizen has made. The ONLY reason that I can see, you have outlined: enticing a nuke steal. However, the events that transpired after rule out this possibility completely. In fact, they actually fit in very well with a mafia choosing to claim PGO in order to stop your FoS from becoming a reality. maybe you actually nabbed a mafia there and caused him to panic?

oh and finally, one nuke was stolen from me

also, re: this latest replacement, i guess this means waiting for a d3 modkill isn't an option, so we are back to discussing citizen vs caller. i'm trying my hardest to explain my position, and i'm pretty sure my judgment is correct here.

No - you do not know I lied. You assume it, based on what you think the definition of the paranoid gun owner is in some other game.

Read every post myself or Inf made - we never claimed to have the ability to hit any night checker. Ever. Had we intended the role claim to be a deterrent for a DT you think we might have mentioned that part, no?

Also, you claim you do not know Caller lied yet? So you think he is both Israel and Japan? And you find it rational for him to claim DT to "stay low and not be a mafia target"? Please explain to me how this laying low business works - I thought the mafia wants to kill DTs, no?

The longer this is going on the more I think you are red. A rational person would not miss these simple facts and constantly try to distort them.


reading the thread will prevent posts like these i'm afraid
but as long as we're absolutely clear, i will adress this too, although I really shouldn't have to. However, at this time, nobody can afford being misinformed so I will lay this out too.

first of all, understand the context in which this post was made. me and opz were debating about caller, and i had fully addressed my suspicions of his lies about his anti nuke arsenal as well as his country. would you like me to pull up the post? after this was taken into account, i stated, as I am stating here again, that the main reason I suspect you over caller is because you lied about your role whereas caller did not. (at this point actually opz brought up that caller may have in fact lied about his role too, but upon further inspection this was not the case -- if it were, my entire position would have to be rethought. I have already said many times caller's claim is sketchy and I would lynch him in an instant UNTIL you showed up. This is very important which is why I'm stating it for the umpteenth time so we're all on the same page here)


The other bit about the PGO -- it is an assumption, and a perfectly valid one. Just as a vigi kills at night, so does a PGO kill his visitors. It is what the role is about. It's not just mafia scum. Every single mafia site agrees.

ECNet:
http://wiki.ecnet.org/wiki/Mafia
Paranoid gun owner – If the paranoid gun owner is targeted at night for anything, whether it's a kill, investigation, or even protection, the paranoid gun owner must kill whomever targeted him


Neoseeker
http://wikiguides.neoseeker.com/wiki/The_Mafia_Game/Army_Veteran
Perhaps a role used more frequently than the Army Veteran role, a Paranoid Gun Owner will automatically kill anyone that targets them at night for any reason, whether positive or negative.


Mafiascum
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Paranoid_Gun_Owner
The Paranoid Gun Owner, similar to the Army Veteran, involuntarily kills anyone who targets him during the night, regardless of alignment. He can be a liability to the Town for this reason, as he indiscriminately kills Cops, Doctors, etc.


Would you like me to keep going?
This isn't a matter of opinion. You lied about your role.

Your entire argument is based on the belief that Infund lied when he mentioned the name Ace gave to his ability. It's impossible for me to justify something Ace did - he defined people's roles as he saw fit in this game.

At the very least admit that neither me nor Infund explicitly claimed to have the ability to kill any night visitors. All we claimed, consistently, was to have the ability to retaliate. There was no explicit attempt to deter any DT from role-checking.


I disagree. if I were to claim vigilante, I don't have to specifically claim that my role is killing people at night. There may be game-specific restrictions like I cannot kill on the first night, or can only kill twice or whatever, but either way I can kill people at night.
Likewise for PGO -- by stating you are PGO, you are explicitly claiming your ability to kill any night visitor indiscriminately. maybe the restriction is you can only do it once then revert to townie (a popular variation) but the underlying mechanics is always there.

as a sidenote to opz -- i have only been skimming you versus lmnop for the reason that if my judgment is correct here, there is at least one mafia between lmnop/iaaan, and very likely both of them are. am i reading this correctly, did he accuse you of being mafia?

The vigilante comparison is not entirely fair, but yes, in the end I wish Ace would have chosen a different name for my ability. In the end it would be quite unfortunate it the town lost because of it.

On another note - you continue to say Caller is being consistent. Please explain how his his claim that he was trying not to be a mafia target and lay low squares with claiming to be a cop, twice. Why did he think that would make him less of a target?


to be fair, i'm not saying caller is being consistent. I'm saying he's the lesser of the 2 evils because at least he hasn't provably lied about his role in a way that doesn't make sense for a townie but does make sense for a mafia trying to dodge a FoS placed by opz
or, would you like to pull up my relevant posts so that i may have a clearer idea of what you mean by saying "you keep saying caller is being consistent"?
like i said, nobody can afford being misinformed here

How does it make sense for a townie to claim Cop so as not to be a mafia target? This only makes sense for a red - since they are not afraid to be killed at night.




first of all, one of the 'prongs' of my argument isn't that your role seems inconsistent with my view of PGO. no. again wrong. let me be perfectly clear. You claim ability X. then you claim role Y with ability Z. There isn't a matter of opinion or assumption here. I have outlined many times, google f'ing PGO if you so desire, i am tired of explaining this point for the umpteenth time. citizen has lied on his role, provably lied, and you don't give a damn. this isn't my view on PGO, this is definition of PGO.
now, this lie (this provable lie) does not make sense if you are a townie. Period. it does make sense otoh if you are a mafia. this is why i am voting for you. and am upset i have only been able to convince iaaan of this fact.

now onto caller's claims. again, i am distraught he isn't posting but that seems to be irrelevant now.
his lies so far included lying about his country name and lying about his antinuke arsenal. both of these i have addressed and did state they look sketchy. however townies can lie with appropriate motive -- look at opz, he has lied several times and he's as good a townie as any, but this works because he had the right motive. however, citizen's lies DO NOT HAVE THE APPROPRIATE MOTIVE FOR IT from a townie point of view. moreover they are more severe and confirmed in the sense that he lied about his role. our track record indicates the only anti town player we caught was because he lied about his role!
god damn i can't make it any f'ing clearer than this.

and the worst part? opz has not addressed the very simple fact that citizen has provably lied about his role. this is what irks me and at this point this is the only thing i want him to answer.

again i re-state:
##vote:citizen

This is retarded. If you can show me a single time in this thread where Inf or myself said we can kill night visitors i will concede to being a "proven" liar. In the meantime your argument is based entirely on the belief that Ace used the same definition of the PGO role you expect to find in every game. That is it. Ask Ace to explain why he chose the PGO name for this ability after the game if you want - I can't tell you that.

Your paragraph about Caller makes no sense, as usual. If you are willing to believe someone claimed cop so as not to be a mafia target I don't know what to say. Perhaps after the game, with a cooler head, you will see that for the absurd statement it is.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 20:40 GMT
#2279
One other thing JeeJee: if you are really sure I am lying, why not nuke me instead of OpZ? Could have been fun, da?
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 21:28 GMT
#2281
Right you are. Here.

##Nuke JeeJee
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 21:33 GMT
#2282
This is just to call you bull-shit. Since you are certain I am lying, you should have no fear to retaliate.

Are we finally on the same page JeeJee?
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 09 2010 23:30 GMT
#2284
It's not armed. In retrospect I should have nuked a 3rd party and then asked Jeejee to nuke me. Perhaps it's not too late, if Flamewheel rules we were "on hold" and that action should not count. I could Nuke OpZ to give him another option to retaliate, then jeejee would nuke me and put his money where his mouth is.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 01:32 GMT
#2334
On April 10 2010 10:25 Elemenope wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2010 10:18 haster27 wrote:
On April 10 2010 10:15 Elemenope wrote:
On April 10 2010 10:10 haster27 wrote:
On April 10 2010 10:06 Elemenope wrote:
With no anti-nukes used on nemy nor Zona the second time, do you honestly think town has anti-nukes left? And if I felt that we were going to lose right here, why would I care about ToD if town can also lose with me?

Well, okay, I am putting a bit of faith on ~OpZ~ here, because I do believe he is Mason. Also, seriously? Mafia can win the game after lynching one Townie since town is in permanent lylo, and they can launch nuke anytime if they are in fail position upcoming days. Are you seriously suggesting Mafia will throw away the win they almost obtained?


What win? Opz has all the mafia by their balls apparently. We have no chance to win now according to Opz. Which means that I should be telling my mafia buddies to go out and throw all these nukes out to get ToD and end the game. In fact, regardless if Opz has all the other mafia pinned, at the very least Caller and I should be throwing out nukes onto other townies, since we're outed as confirmed mafia, after all, if we were to die, why not take a townie with us?

To the contrary, when the ~OpZ~ had citizen side by the balls, why didn't Mafia follow same nuke ditch strategy either? Your argument is ineffective.



I don't know why mafia didn't follow the same strategy. Why don't you go ask them?

Excellent. So then My nuke did not go through either, right? So let's do this the right way JeeJee - launch you nuke now. You go first, i retaliate. Let's go.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 01:39 GMT
#2337
On April 10 2010 10:34 haster27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2010 10:32 citi.zen wrote:
On April 10 2010 10:25 Elemenope wrote:
On April 10 2010 10:18 haster27 wrote:
On April 10 2010 10:15 Elemenope wrote:
On April 10 2010 10:10 haster27 wrote:
On April 10 2010 10:06 Elemenope wrote:
With no anti-nukes used on nemy nor Zona the second time, do you honestly think town has anti-nukes left? And if I felt that we were going to lose right here, why would I care about ToD if town can also lose with me?

Well, okay, I am putting a bit of faith on ~OpZ~ here, because I do believe he is Mason. Also, seriously? Mafia can win the game after lynching one Townie since town is in permanent lylo, and they can launch nuke anytime if they are in fail position upcoming days. Are you seriously suggesting Mafia will throw away the win they almost obtained?


What win? Opz has all the mafia by their balls apparently. We have no chance to win now according to Opz. Which means that I should be telling my mafia buddies to go out and throw all these nukes out to get ToD and end the game. In fact, regardless if Opz has all the other mafia pinned, at the very least Caller and I should be throwing out nukes onto other townies, since we're outed as confirmed mafia, after all, if we were to die, why not take a townie with us?

To the contrary, when the ~OpZ~ had citizen side by the balls, why didn't Mafia follow same nuke ditch strategy either? Your argument is ineffective.



I don't know why mafia didn't follow the same strategy. Why don't you go ask them?

Excellent. So then My nuke did not go through either, right? So let's do this the right way JeeJee - launch you nuke now. You go first, i retaliate. Let's go.

1) The nuke can only be launched at Day.
2) You are an idiot.

1. You are right of course, I for some reason assumed the day was extended and Flame was talking about his second nuke.
2. Yes, that was dumb.

@LMNOP - I hadn't read the posts carefully. Hence #2 above.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 01:54 GMT
#2338
On April 10 2010 09:55 haster27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2010 09:52 JeeJee wrote:
On April 10 2010 09:44 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On April 10 2010 09:17 haster27 wrote:
Warning: Citizen, I know you are frustrated, but seeing as now you can launch retaliation nuke against JeeJee, I will have to warn you as precaution. If you launch another nuke toward JeeJee I will be forced to abandon my defense of you completely. Also please confirm that the nuke you just robbed was fake because possibility of you lying about your ability still somewhat exists.


JeeJee no has bold. Can not be real nuke. Do not, I repeat do NOT hit him Citizen.

GOD FUCKING DAMN YOU GUYS.


he's a fucking lying cunt, he can't do shit
you want me to bold it?
##Nuke:citi.zen

citizen, WE HAVE THIS SHIT SEALED. WE HAVE 100% CHANCE OF LYNCHING ELEMENOPE, AND CALLER WILL BE MUCH EASIER TO VOTE OFF TOMORROW. PLEASE REFRAIN FROM RESPONDING TO JEEJEE's PROVOCATIONS. THIS IS WHERE YOU BECOME EITHER MVP or LVP

We don't have anything sealed. JeeJee is probably town but an idiot who won't listen to anything but himself. He will never vote with us because... he's can't get it through his head that there is any way I am telling the truth. So we can't even lynch fucking Caller, Mr. "oh hai, I'm going to fake claim cop so the red's don't hit me at night". A draw has it's appeal at the moment, while I can still force it.

A missed lynching opportunity followed by something happening to me at night would be worse.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 02:03 GMT
#2339
On April 10 2010 09:52 JeeJee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2010 09:44 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On April 10 2010 09:17 haster27 wrote:
Warning: Citizen, I know you are frustrated, but seeing as now you can launch retaliation nuke against JeeJee, I will have to warn you as precaution. If you launch another nuke toward JeeJee I will be forced to abandon my defense of you completely. Also please confirm that the nuke you just robbed was fake because possibility of you lying about your ability still somewhat exists.


JeeJee no has bold. Can not be real nuke. Do not, I repeat do NOT hit him Citizen.

GOD FUCKING DAMN YOU GUYS.


he's a fucking lying cunt, he can't do shit
you want me to bold it?
##Nuke:citi.zen

Saved to quote in future games when I need to prove you are an idiot and I told you so.

Carry on.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 02:06 GMT
#2340
I think the reds are in good shape, and they know it. However, they can only steal 1 nuke per night (confirmed by moderator). So at the end of the night, if I am alive, I would still have at least two nukes. Meaning a draw for the town would still be an option. Again, if I remain alive. We will see.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 13:37 GMT
#2348
I voted for lmnop, instead of caller. Seems to me you stopped a lynching twice, but maybe that is not fair.

Regardless - if I live we can draw. Otherwise, town, pretty please Lynch Caller once you see my flip. Not a difficult decision.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 14:13 GMT
#2350
Whatever. Told you where we stand now.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 15:49 GMT
#2352
Clearly they don't have the numbers or the game would be over, formally. It ain't. This is why I told you we could draw or extend this by lynching caller, depending on whether I live or not.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 19:58 GMT
#2374
(10:14:22 PM) Ace: almsot a lynch
(10:14:25 PM) Ace: massive accusations
(10:14:33 PM) Ace: busts out a bus driver fucked me over insane cop role claim
(10:14:37 PM) Ace: and everyone nods their heads
(10:14:40 PM) Ace: this is bs lol


Pretty much, as I've said at least a dozen times since I started playing. No idea how anyone can believe such a tall pile of shit, yet they did, for days on end! The funny thing is, with him confirmed red, most mafia were going to fall pretty easily. So this was a very risky strategy in many ways, yet it paid off.

GG reds, JeeJee MVP in my book.

LVP - everyone on town who didn't vote for Caller. Seriously.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 20:02 GMT
#2378
On April 10 2010 03:40 citi.zen wrote:
I can't believe you guys are still not seeing that Caller is red. It's beyond me how he can have you believe one lie after another after another simply by changing his story after any new suspicion is shed on him.

Look at micro-mafia 1. I was in the same situation with Ace there. I was right there too. Of course, being right doesn't matter if you can't persuade others, so I guess I fail and Caller wins. Too bad for the town. Sorry, I am out of patience.

On this note I am taking a break from playing mafia for a while. I'll help host if needed, but will not play for a while.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 22:34 GMT
#2390
One note on the observers: a comment from Flame said at one point "this is even funnier when you know the roles". That was when I was arguing vs. Caller, and put some doubt in my mind that maybe opz was red, since it was the only "funny"outcome. The other alternative was really bad townies- sad more than "funny". Please watch those comments in the future: -)
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 10 2010 23:45 GMT
#2401
On April 11 2010 08:38 Bill Murray wrote:
caller for MVP obviously

He actually made many sloppy mistakes but had great support and a most gullible town. Jeejee tottered that plausible deniability line much much better I thought.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
April 11 2010 02:51 GMT
#2414
Excellent use of the PGO thing to draw fire away from Caller, but I really think it wasn't fair to call it that. Or, citi.zen/Infund could've just left out the role name, since you should know it will draw that kind of fire...

I know Infund regretted mentioning the name of the ability, even if it was just in parentheses, and at the time I doubt he was aware of the "usual" abilities associated with it. Ideally it would have been called something else, yes.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 55
CranKy Ducklings48
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko287
Harstem 257
Nina 217
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 6628
Sea 3193
Mind 990
Larva 894
Stork 850
JYJ512
TY 285
Pusan 284
EffOrt 267
Last 217
[ Show more ]
Hyun 213
Light 210
Zeus 155
Snow 136
PianO 122
Barracks 88
ToSsGirL 75
Backho 48
sSak 46
Rush 37
sorry 36
Sacsri 27
Sharp 27
GoRush 24
Icarus 24
scan(afreeca) 20
ajuk12(nOOB) 16
IntoTheRainbow 12
SilentControl 11
Noble 6
Hm[arnc] 5
Bale 4
Dota 2
Gorgc8208
singsing2378
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss676
x6flipin540
sgares355
byalli188
Other Games
B2W.Neo832
DeMusliM285
Fuzer 273
SortOf133
Mew2King55
Trikslyr23
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2367
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1272
Upcoming Events
OSC
1h 28m
WardiTV European League
4h 28m
Fjant vs Babymarine
Mixu vs HiGhDrA
Gerald vs ArT
goblin vs MaNa
Jumy vs YoungYakov
Replay Cast
12h 28m
Epic.LAN
1d
CranKy Ducklings
1d 22h
Epic.LAN
2 days
CSO Contender
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Esports World Cup
4 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.