• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:22
CET 22:22
KST 06:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners10Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11
Community News
StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!41$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship6[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win10
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon! Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close"
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review
Tourneys
[BSL21] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET [ASL20] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Why we need SC3
Hildegard
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1426 users

What the Ravager does and what he needs. - Page 2

Forum Index > Legacy of the Void
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
ZergLingShepherd1
Profile Joined June 2015
404 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-22 14:24:35
June 22 2015 10:51 GMT
#21
On June 22 2015 12:31 Lexender wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2015 07:33 ZergLingShepherd1 wrote:

Its really dumb logic here and mainly why they dont work right now in any compositions.
No support unit should battle for front space on main lines.



You mean like sentries and ghosts?


No, i already explained why those units can protect themselfs, are small enough to be microed can use FF etc.

On June 22 2015 14:27 ETisME wrote:
I do agree that ravager needs a look at. It is too easily clumped and blocked due to its fat model size and the horrible range.
But to be honest, I don't know how it can be improved as well, it's in such an awkward position


Like i said 6 range would make it a support unit.
Also the models could be a bit smaller.
The price, at least in gas should be lowered since they arent greater the roaches and should never be, so their price should not be this expensive.
"The Fractured but Whole"
parkufarku
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
882 Posts
June 22 2015 13:54 GMT
#22
Completely agree on the range issue. At this point, it's a redundant unit. But you should post on Bnet forums instead, you'll have more chance of catching Blizz's attention than here
Lexender
Profile Joined September 2013
Mexico2655 Posts
June 22 2015 14:13 GMT
#23
Ok I behaved like an asshole sorry about that.

However I disagree in big part, Ravagers, shouldn't be used as damage dealers, thats what roaches and hydras are for, I just think that the spell should be stronger, I'm not sure what is it that it would take for that but I don't think improving their attack is the solution.

Ravagers should be support units not stronger roaches.
ZergLingShepherd1
Profile Joined June 2015
404 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-22 14:34:04
June 22 2015 14:33 GMT
#24
On June 22 2015 23:13 Lexender wrote:
Ok I behaved like an asshole sorry about that.

However I disagree in big part, Ravagers, shouldn't be used as damage dealers, thats what roaches and hydras are for, I just think that the spell should be stronger, I'm not sure what is it that it would take for that but I don't think improving their attack is the solution.

Ravagers should be support units not stronger roaches.


Well there is another idea that has some support from the community.

That is to remove the attack of the ravager completely and make the corrosive bile stronger, more AoE and Range for the skill shot and faster landing hits + a buff to health.

That would make the unit a support artillery unit.

I do agree that they should not be better then roaches, but they should also be useful for their cost otherwise people will make just more roaches and never ravagers like we are seeing in the beta.
"The Fractured but Whole"
TheWinks
Profile Joined July 2011
United States572 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-22 15:57:02
June 22 2015 15:56 GMT
#25
Ravagers were nerfed because they were too strong. Lurkers were amusingly buffed before that nerf because ravagers were too strong and are along the roach/hydra tech path. Ravagers are there as a potential balance knob to turn, but at this point they don't need a buff for the sake of a buff.
ZergLingShepherd1
Profile Joined June 2015
404 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-22 16:35:31
June 22 2015 16:33 GMT
#26
On June 22 2015 22:54 parkufarku wrote:
Completely agree on the range issue. At this point, it's a redundant unit. But you should post on Bnet forums instead, you'll have more chance of catching Blizz's attention than here


I posted there to, but to many trolls on Bnet, here at least there are some people with arguments or at least a discussion.

On June 23 2015 00:56 TheWinks wrote:
Ravagers were nerfed because they were too strong. Lurkers were amusingly buffed before that nerf because ravagers were too strong and are along the roach/hydra tech path. Ravagers are there as a potential balance knob to turn, but at this point they don't need a buff for the sake of a buff.


I agree that they where too strong but they are now overnerfed. If you watched a minimum of LotV tournaments you would know that.
"The Fractured but Whole"
LoneYoShi
Profile Blog Joined June 2014
France1348 Posts
June 24 2015 13:04 GMT
#27
On June 23 2015 01:33 ZergLingShepherd1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2015 22:54 parkufarku wrote:
Completely agree on the range issue. At this point, it's a redundant unit. But you should post on Bnet forums instead, you'll have more chance of catching Blizz's attention than here


I posted there to, but to many trolls on Bnet, here at least there are some people with arguments or at least a discussion.

Show nested quote +
On June 23 2015 00:56 TheWinks wrote:
Ravagers were nerfed because they were too strong. Lurkers were amusingly buffed before that nerf because ravagers were too strong and are along the roach/hydra tech path. Ravagers are there as a potential balance knob to turn, but at this point they don't need a buff for the sake of a buff.


I agree that they where too strong but they are now overnerfed. If you watched a minimum of LotV tournaments you would know that.


And now you're asking for +50% in range AND a price decrease ? I know LotV is here to experiment big changes, but I'm not sure you realise what you're really asking for here.

Regarding your argument that they are only used in ZvZ: have you seen ghost outside of lategame TvP ? Or reapers used past the 8th minute mark in any matchup ? Some units are niche units, and there's nothing wrong with that. You can't expect to have all units viable during the whole game in all matchups...
ZergLingShepherd1
Profile Joined June 2015
404 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-24 13:30:55
June 24 2015 13:28 GMT
#28
On June 24 2015 22:04 LoneYoShi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 23 2015 01:33 ZergLingShepherd1 wrote:
On June 22 2015 22:54 parkufarku wrote:
Completely agree on the range issue. At this point, it's a redundant unit. But you should post on Bnet forums instead, you'll have more chance of catching Blizz's attention than here


I posted there to, but to many trolls on Bnet, here at least there are some people with arguments or at least a discussion.

On June 23 2015 00:56 TheWinks wrote:
Ravagers were nerfed because they were too strong. Lurkers were amusingly buffed before that nerf because ravagers were too strong and are along the roach/hydra tech path. Ravagers are there as a potential balance knob to turn, but at this point they don't need a buff for the sake of a buff.


I agree that they where too strong but they are now overnerfed. If you watched a minimum of LotV tournaments you would know that.


And now you're asking for +50% in range AND a price decrease ? I know LotV is here to experiment big changes, but I'm not sure you realise what you're really asking for here.

Regarding your argument that they are only used in ZvZ: have you seen ghost outside of lategame TvP ? Or reapers used past the 8th minute mark in any matchup ? Some units are niche units, and there's nothing wrong with that. You can't expect to have all units viable during the whole game in all matchups...


Im asking for the unit to become a support unit as it was designed, 6 range allows for that, right now its a main unit with a support ability that cant be used in any unit compostions.

Ghost is a tier 3 unit not 1 tier unit as Ravager, it will be used vs High Armor units like Ultralisk/Immortals and EMP for HT
There is not a single unit that can do the same agreesion as the Reaper in the early game from the Terran side, its not the same thing when it comes to roaches and ravagers.

And that is the problem this unit has no role... like i said its used just in ZvZ and his role was supposed to be against FF + zoning and supporting, but its not used because its to expensive, and Roaches with tunelling claws >>> Ravagers and after early game, Lurkers > Ravagers

It has no place for now, not even as a niche unit.
"The Fractured but Whole"
ejozl
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark3453 Posts
June 24 2015 15:06 GMT
#29
If you buff it's range that's a buff in DPS in fights, because it has to move around less and it's a buff to it's survivability while shooting. This sounds like a combat buff to me, rather than a buff in it's supporting role.
If you want to give a buff to the units supporting role=the ability, you must increase the strength of said ability.
SC2 Archon needs "Terrible, terrible damage" as one of it's quotes.
eviltomahawk
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States11135 Posts
June 24 2015 15:15 GMT
#30
I'd say buff the autoattack range, decrease the damage by a lot, and then compensate by buffing corrosive bile. Focus the design on the utility of corrosive bile and less on its direct combat stats. The autoattack should just help in positioning in combat and being useful in a pinch, not as a direct upgrade over the Roach attack.
ㅇㅅㅌㅅ
ZergLingShepherd1
Profile Joined June 2015
404 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-24 15:34:04
June 24 2015 15:22 GMT
#31
On June 25 2015 00:06 ejozl wrote:
If you buff it's range that's a buff in DPS in fights, because it has to move around less and it's a buff to it's survivability while shooting. This sounds like a combat buff to me, rather than a buff in it's supporting role.
If you want to give a buff to the units supporting role=the ability, you must increase the strength of said ability.


You can nerf the damege to compensate, but at least now they can be used in compostion and do their support role, while not dying in the main line.
Also im all for even removing the attack as long asthe ability is stonger and has a better range faster landing and more AoE, in order to use it as a support unit.

Something like artillery units.
"The Fractured but Whole"
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL 21
20:00
ProLeague - RO32 Group A
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs OyAji
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
ZZZero.O227
LiquipediaDiscussion
LAN Event
18:00
Stellar Fest: Day 2
Zoun vs Scarlett
Clem vs TriGGeR
ComeBackTV 824
UrsaTVCanada759
IndyStarCraft 267
EnkiAlexander 68
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 267
Nathanias 74
elazer 56
Railgan 53
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 1555
ZZZero.O 227
White-Ra 153
Dota 2
febbydoto10
LuMiX1
League of Legends
KnowMe87
Counter-Strike
kRYSTAL_44
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu395
Khaldor236
Other Games
Grubby4425
Beastyqt773
Pyrionflax259
Mlord225
Fuzer 211
ToD122
mouzStarbuck113
ArmadaUGS110
goatrope71
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick779
Counter-Strike
PGL161
Other Games
angryscii16
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 3
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• 3DClanTV 34
• HerbMon 31
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2581
• Ler94
• lizZardDota279
League of Legends
• imaqtpie2816
Other Games
• Scarra596
• Shiphtur275
• tFFMrPink 18
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 38m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
12h 38m
WardiTV Korean Royale
14h 38m
LAN Event
17h 38m
IPSL
20h 38m
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
BSL 21
22h 38m
spx vs rasowy
HBO vs KameZerg
Cross vs Razz
dxtr13 vs ZZZero
Replay Cast
1d 11h
Wardi Open
1d 14h
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
BSL 21
6 days
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.