EPTAlso, worse than XDG levels of sad.
[Patch 4.2] Xerath/Skarner General Discussion - Page 118
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
JALbert
United States484 Posts
Also, worse than XDG levels of sad. | ||
|
nafta
Bulgaria18893 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
Harem
United States11393 Posts
On February 24 2014 12:50 AsmodeusXI wrote: Please rate sadness on scale from "TSM Loses to CST" to "Everything XDG Does." Watching Cheep play vs a Nidalee. | ||
|
Zdrastochye
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
On February 24 2014 12:54 IamPryda wrote: i thought if one team has a duo and the other doesn't, then the team without the duo gets a higher overall mmr? yes, that was the case i thought | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
I don’t think this is possible? In ranked I thought it must be duo vs duo. | ||
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
ZING 1v1 pls | ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
On February 24 2014 13:26 Sufficiency wrote: I don’t think this is possible? In ranked I thought it must be duo vs duo. it can be, but ive had games where its duo vs no duo, and the non duo team has higher mmr to compensate for the "coordination(lol)" of the other team | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
|
Zdrastochye
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
Fixed. But yeah, it was pretty sad to have them give up on a big stage. All challenger teams are just one step away from an LCS berth if they have one good run. | ||
|
JALbert
United States484 Posts
On February 24 2014 13:54 cLutZ wrote: Can we not do LCS spoilers here please? I mean, I probably wont watch those games, but theres a reason there is a thread. It wasn't official LCS stuff, it was a minor tournament that I hadn't heard of until someone linked me the stream halfway through the last game. | ||
|
Omnishroud
1073 Posts
On February 24 2014 06:01 FinestHour wrote: lol lux trying to auto attack something in an actual 5v5 hahahahhahahaahahha Way to be a complete dick. Its not like im discussing shit on the level of support WW. Auto attacking something in a 5v5 is so unheard of right, because lux has 0 downtime on her spells and just spams them all day. At the least your kiting whoever has dived you, not exactly impossible to throw out an AA doing that. At most your getting others during CD's. Her E is pretty much built for you to auto attack and then carry on kiting. Yes lux is never going to want to be auto-attacking shit in the backline at the start of a fight but the backline arent the only targets and the start of a fight isnt all of it. I guess the weakness would come from when you get fed and get focused, as it would be infinitely harder to use the lichbane procs then just spam Q/E and run. If you never have enough time to autoattack something then your positioning sucks tbh. Anyway, thanks mb / 5hit for the info. I didnt run any numbers it was just a theory so if drings / amp tomes / AP just scales better, so be it. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On February 24 2014 14:45 JALbert wrote: It wasn't official LCS stuff, it was a minor tournament that I hadn't heard of until someone linked me the stream halfway through the last game. Ahh. Very good then. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On February 24 2014 15:09 Omnishroud wrote: Way to be a complete dick. Its not like im discussing shit on the level of support WW. Auto attacking something in a 5v5 is so unheard of right, because lux has 0 downtime on her spells and just spams them all day. At the least your kiting whoever has dived you, not exactly impossible to throw out an AA doing that. At most your getting others during CD's. Her E is pretty much built for you to auto attack and then carry on kiting. Yes lux is never going to want to be auto-attacking shit in the backline at the start of a fight but the backline arent the only targets and the start of a fight isnt all of it. I guess the weakness would come from when you get fed and get focused, as it would be infinitely harder to use the lichbane procs then just spam Q/E and run. If you never have enough time to autoattack something then your positioning sucks tbh. Anyway, thanks mb / 5hit for the info. I didnt run any numbers it was just a theory so if drings / amp tomes / AP just scales better, so be it. Lux just doesn't play that way. Her whole kit is designed around doing ez massive aoe damage to back line while wave clearing like a beast. Her combos are instant, and don't allow for time to AA. The only time you have luxury to do so, is only when you're in laning phase and only looking to harass the enemy laner. Past lane phase, it's all about Q+E+R combo, instantly. You're not going to be able to walk up to use any of your passive procs or lichbane procs. Mostly because your range of engage is usually much higher than your AA. Not to mention, Lux's kit is mostly designed to disuade from fighting. Usually enough burst to force someone on the enemy backline to back to base, and then take a turret because the enemy knows they can't fight anymore now. | ||
|
FinestHour
United States18466 Posts
On February 24 2014 15:09 Omnishroud wrote: Way to be a complete dick. Its not like im discussing shit on the level of support WW. Auto attacking something in a 5v5 is so unheard of right, because lux has 0 downtime on her spells and just spams them all day. At the least your kiting whoever has dived you, not exactly impossible to throw out an AA doing that. At most your getting others during CD's. Her E is pretty much built for you to auto attack and then carry on kiting. Yes lux is never going to want to be auto-attacking shit in the backline at the start of a fight but the backline arent the only targets and the start of a fight isnt all of it. I guess the weakness would come from when you get fed and get focused, as it would be infinitely harder to use the lichbane procs then just spam Q/E and run. If you never have enough time to autoattack something then your positioning sucks tbh. Anyway, thanks mb / 5hit for the info. I didnt run any numbers it was just a theory so if drings / amp tomes / AP just scales better, so be it. woah there kiddo i wasnt trying to be a dick it was just funny as hell wei2coolman is the that flamed u | ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
On February 24 2014 15:34 FinestHour wrote: woah there kiddo i wasnt trying to be a dick it was just funny as hell wei2coolman is the that flamed u should something be surprising about that statement? | ||
|
JazzVortical
Australia1825 Posts
| ||
| ||
