[Patch 3.04: Zac] General Discussion - Page 17

On March 20 2013 12:29 Gahlo wrote:

Spells reduce it by a second, autos by .5 second. Relax.

On March 20 2013 12:18 beefhamburger wrote:
Curse vs. CLG+sayocean(?) subbing for aphro scrim
http://clgaming.net/live/5771-crs-voyboy

On March 20 2013 12:50 MoonBear wrote:

Say0cean is CLG's General Manager/PR/Marketing dude.

On March 20 2013 13:07 Craton wrote:
Why wouldn't he just use his own account?

On March 20 2013 13:07 Craton wrote:
Why wouldn't he just use his own account?

On March 20 2013 13:09 emperorchampion wrote:


Didn't he get banned for two weeks?

On March 20 2013 13:09 wei2coolman wrote:

Seems risky, considering the whole elo-boosting thing (the whole idea is it broke term of service)....

Anyways, watching curse scrim with clg; curse looking very rusty playing with nyjacky.
Also interesting team comp, going for triple support + carry.

On March 20 2013 12:46 phyvo wrote:
That depends.

If you land a Q on one guy every time it's up the CD on mantra is actually around 16 seconds (when the CDR is 2 seconds, it increases as you level). That's easily twice any fight that isn't one-sided. Even at 27 seconds that's shorter than Cho's feast which in longer fights you can sometimes use twice.

The thing is what do you want to mantra in a team fight? Mantra Q requires setup because *anyone* can just walk out of the delayed damage even on a direct hit. Mantra W is great for 1v1 but doesn't help your team much. Mantra E... well I'd have to try it in a real team fight to see but the damage would be higher than a mantra Q that wiffed, the AOE shield is about as strong as locket not counting AP.

On March 20 2013 13:21 Craton wrote:
I think the point he was after is that even in a best-case scenario it's quite long.

On March 20 2013 13:27 Sufficiency wrote:
And ChaoX is taking a break from LoL.... lolz. The fall of TSM?

On March 20 2013 13:27 Sufficiency wrote:
And ChaoX is taking a break from LoL.... lolz. The fall of TSM?

On March 20 2013 04:48 clickrush wrote:

2. caitlyn: I think ppl like her because she is easy to play during the laning phase. What alot of players don't realize is that she actually has to snowball her early advantage to be as useful as other ad carries. she is probably the worst scaling ad carry in the game with her only steroid literally being her range which other ad carries can also provide, while cait lacks that extra something. ppl take it too easy with her and don't play her aggressive enough to keep up or carry with her.
.

On March 20 2013 07:39 Dark_Chill wrote:


I'd actually like them to keep his bas the way it is now, but bring back his old W. Maybe lower some other stuff in the process. Thinking on it now, that ability was pretty unique, and it gave him a cool role on a team other than extremely safe adc.

Also, why aren't more people playing Nami? She has one of the best ults I've ever seen. A fight breaks out, drop the R, drop the Q. It's so strong. Her laning isn't bad either. I actually like it more than Sona, because with Sona I always feel really fragile and I get the feeling I could die at any time. With Nami, I feel like I have enough tools to keep alive in tough situations.