EPT[Patch 1.0.0.153: Preseason Balance Update 1] GD - Page 444
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
GettingIt
1656 Posts
| ||
|
dnastyx
United States2707 Posts
and then you would just randomly crit once in lane and win lololol best game | ||
|
wussleeQ
United States3130 Posts
On January 16 2013 06:50 Zooper31 wrote: Chalice must, tears also good after chalice. Athene a lot better no need for tear. Also, Vi stands for Viable (in the jungle)! | ||
Ares[Effort]
DEMACIA6550 Posts
http://www.sporcle.com/games/MunchkinSmith/league-of-legends-champions-fully-updated | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19573 Posts
On January 16 2013 07:32 Milestone wrote: It's not because Janna sucks. It's just that the players / teams feel that strong supports that do a lot of things very efficiently (versatile so picking at almost any stage of the picking phase is OK). She's still the queen of late game "peel" and movespeed is super nice. A lot of the additions of this Season 3 patch helped her less than other supports who have very high efficiency with flask or straight regen(philo) / sightstone. Her base mana pool is high, her mana regen is on par with the mana regen of other strong supports but they have low base mana pool and LESS mana cost overall on abilities make flask a lot more appropriate. Also she requires high mana on reserve to use the spells in critical situations (All abilities will cost around 100-200 higher than the stronger supports mentioned). Janna just isn't a safe pick at all because it's much tougher to meet her late game potential because of all the pressure that will come early / mid game where she is weaker. (Only checked Zyra, Sona, Lulu for the general stuff mentioned in this post gg) Also blitz has only slightly lower mana regeneration compared to Janna and his mana costs are flat across the board. more ggggg I do feel like the charge on Tornado is a problem for her. Charging up the damage is one thing, charging for utility is another. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
On January 16 2013 07:42 Chrispy wrote: Hate to burst your bubble Two_Down but I've been doing this since before you were born. Which would be odd since there is about a 50% chance I'm older than you are. | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On January 16 2013 07:55 Ares[Effort] wrote: Can you name all the champions http://www.sporcle.com/games/MunchkinSmith/league-of-legends-champions-fully-updated Sadly, I only got 91. It's amazing how hard it is to come up with these names when you're under time pressure and have no context in which to fire the neurons. | ||
|
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
On January 16 2013 08:09 Seuss wrote: Sadly, I only got 91. It's amazing how hard it is to come up with these names when you're under time pressure and have no context in which to fire the neurons. 84 =/. But I'm also taking notes in class at the same time so maybe I have an excuse. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
On January 16 2013 07:46 GettingIt wrote: I actually never heard about people mixing 1 crit chance in the red runes. Is that something I should start doing, or is it only for lulz? On January 16 2013 07:50 dnastyx wrote: remember when you could spec a mastery for crit chance and then you would just randomly crit once in lane and win lololol best game Basically its to get this opportunity back since now you cant actually crit unless you purchase crit, which typically is later on in the game. Its a pretty cheap way to have the possibility to crit earlier, even if the chance is pretty low. It used to be a free 4% from masteries that actually ended up ruining lanes so much that Riot had to remove it. Some people mix in a crit rune, others just stick with straight AD. | ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
Have more fun discussion time. Sounds like the sc2 system, but with the opportunity to play a game to rank up. | ||
|
Djin)ftw(
Germany3357 Posts
On January 16 2013 08:10 Amui wrote: 84 =/. But I'm also taking notes in class at the same time so maybe I have an excuse. 65  haha I'm so bad. But indeed, withut context it's hard to recall all the heros. Especially when you only own 25 or so like me | ||
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
On January 16 2013 08:15 Irave wrote: http://na.leagueoflegends.com/news/new-league-system-coming-soon-ranked Have more fun discussion time. Sounds like the sc2 system, but with the opportunity to play a game to rank up. Wow, just like Starcraft. Also, it seems like placement matches will matter a lot cause you need to jump so many hurdles to get promoted zzz. Also, I only got 100 champions. I didn't even remember Tundle, Trynd or Ziggs even existed lol. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On January 16 2013 07:55 Ares[Effort] wrote: Can you name all the champions http://www.sporcle.com/games/MunchkinSmith/league-of-legends-champions-fully-updated I only got 79. Missed all the easy ones =[ | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
On January 16 2013 08:15 Irave wrote: http://na.leagueoflegends.com/news/new-league-system-coming-soon-ranked Have more fun discussion time. Sounds like the sc2 system, but with the opportunity to play a game to rank up. God fucking dammit. The reason I liked LoL so much was BECAUSE they didnt have that retarded SC2 style system. Give me a real fucking ladder. Fuck. | ||
|
DoXa
Switzerland1448 Posts
| ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On January 16 2013 08:19 Two_DoWn wrote: God fucking dammit. The reason I liked LoL so much was BECAUSE they didnt have that retarded SC2 style system. Give me a real fucking ladder. Fuck. Yea don't get it at all. Hated that ladder system. | ||
|
JBright
Vancouver14381 Posts
On January 16 2013 08:19 Two_DoWn wrote: God fucking dammit. The reason I liked LoL so much was BECAUSE they didnt have that retarded SC2 style system. Give me a real fucking ladder. Fuck. This is what everyone wanted with more Ranked 5s incentives. It does look like Blizzard's system of inviting GM players to the National Championships. Isn't SoloQ is still ladder though? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On January 16 2013 08:19 Two_DoWn wrote: God fucking dammit. The reason I liked LoL so much was BECAUSE they didnt have that retarded SC2 style system. Give me a real fucking ladder. Fuck. Oh, what the fuck, Riot. That poor excuse for a ladder system Blizzard currently uses is just horrible. 'Better way of tracking your progress' my ass. This is what everyone wanted with more Ranked 5s incentives. It does look like Blizzard's system of inviting GM players to the National Championships. Isn't SoloQ is still ladder though? Oh come on, JBright. They've already essentially done this by taking the top 32 teams into the LCS Quals initially. Why did they need to do a complete overhaul? And what about their shiny new badges with their gem system that no one gives a fuck about? | ||
|
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
On January 16 2013 08:25 JBright wrote: This is what everyone wanted with more Ranked 5s incentives. It does look like Blizzard's system of inviting GM players to the National Championships. Isn't SoloQ is still ladder though? The wording suggests otherwise since they keep mentioning solo/duo and the example is strictly solo. | ||
|
kainzero
United States5211 Posts
this system seems much better, once you pass a certain milestone you don't have to play with terrible players in the tier below you, lol. | ||
| ||
