[Patch 1.0.0.134: Nautilus] General Discussion - Page 132

On February 24 2012 08:24 JBright wrote:


Trump's been streaming for the last week at least. He's like ~lvl 15 on that account (maybe a smurf?) so he's still got a ways to go.

On February 24 2012 07:21 warscythes wrote:


CC scales.

A stun late game is much stronger than a stun early game due to the nature of team fights/objectives/respawn timer/damage vs tankiness wise.

It is how champions like Leona/Ashe scale even though it seems that they should be really weak late game.

On February 24 2012 10:13 Offhand wrote:
How are reported idiots immediately matched with you again on the same team? This has happened on far too many occasions. It's like Riot wants me to stop playing.

I mean, it could put me in the same game as them. I'd love a chance to up against the tards that ruined your last game, but what the hell is the report feature for if it doesn't get rid of trolls?

On February 24 2012 10:22 arb wrote:

Id probably wait a few mins before i queue again if i get a serious retard

i thought ignoring them means you cant get matched up with them again though

On February 24 2012 10:10 UniversalSnip wrote:
I absolutely do not agree. aoe cc often scales because it's simply hitting more targets late game, but single target stuns and other disables scale negatively with the length of the game. This is why the all cc team low elo loves is typically garbage, they get outscaled and end up with no damage as the midgame starts closing out.

On February 24 2012 12:32 TheYango wrote:

They scale in that the value of what the target could have done in that time is higher, so it's more damaging. Early game, stunning someone for 2 seconds might only prevent them from doing 100 damage. Lategame that could be 1000 damage.

What sort of teams are you talking about? It's hard for a team that has decent CC on all team members to be bad. Damage is largely more a result of farm than from champion kit, so in low Elo, "no damage" is likely to be a product of that fact that your carries suck at farming--any AD carry that can manage to get to IE/PD/LW is going to hit like a truck. Likewise, CC's efficacy depends a lot on how well it's used, so poor usage will make CC look like it's not doing a lot.

On February 24 2012 12:59 UniversalSnip wrote:


compare the value of taric stun at 6 minutes to taric stun at 40. I don't know whether it's merc treads or qss or the fact that squishier targets tend to be further from the cc or something inherent to the scaling of cc vs the scaling of damage steroids/items or all of those or something else entirely but single target cc gets wayyyy worse as the game goes on.

On February 24 2012 13:24 Craton wrote:
Looks like a CLG vs Crs scrim about to start.

On February 24 2012 10:10 UniversalSnip wrote:


I absolutely do not agree. aoe cc often scales because it's simply hitting more targets late game, but single target stuns and other disables scale negatively with the length of the game. This is why the all cc team low elo loves is typically garbage, they get outscaled and end up with no damage as the midgame starts closing out.

On February 24 2012 14:00 Two_DoWn wrote:
This scrim is lulzy.

On February 24 2012 14:08 OreoBoi wrote:


Saint blaming doublelift, chauster apologizes lol

On February 24 2012 14:12 Agnosthar wrote:
I haven't watched many scrims before, I'm amazed at how critical CLG are of each other. Do other LoL teams flat out flame each other this much?