EPT[Patch 1.0.0.129: Fizz] General Discussion - Page 85
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
| ||
|
emucxg
Finland4559 Posts
On November 23 2011 01:09 Node wrote: So the next champion is Iorek Byrnison... I don't know if there's a way I'm not gonna insta-buy that shit. The only new champ im gonna buy is Ali: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/PvGeE.jpg) edit. its no Ali, It's gonna be Ari (according to Tencent, which referrals Korean Arirang) | ||
|
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
| ||
|
emucxg
Finland4559 Posts
On November 23 2011 01:12 Sabin010 wrote: I find ganking to be difficult in solo queue as I have trouble communicating when we should commit and when we should disengage. Basically, its dependent upon the play style of the laner who's lane you're ganking. I have no problem jungling in arranged 5s because of better communication, but I basically gave up on jungling in solo queue. That said I commit to the gank in my lane 90% of the time unless the counter gank is already shown incoming. playing jungle in soloQ is so dumb situation: I'm doing red, ashe soraka bot. me: hey bot, dont push the lane, im gonna gank bot soon ashe: ok ashe volleys the creeps, trololol | ||
|
Craton
United States17233 Posts
A.) The lane is pushed B.) Summoners have been blown / hp is low C.) The champion has retarded scaling (aka Nasus) Some junglers have really strong level 2 ganks (Lee Sin), while others should wait until 3 (Amumu, Rammus) or later. I avoid a level 2 gank if it will impede my ability to clear the jungle. Most junglers can get their full gank arsenal at level 3 and still finish their clear without incident. As rammus, I might clear blue > wraiths and get a level in w q e, then come around from behind the mid lane to gank whatever is there. This will force either a flash or a kill 95% of the time. However, if the lane is pushed into their tower, you will never accomplish a gank, so you just keep clearing your jungle. | ||
|
Mogwai
United States13274 Posts
| ||
|
Southlight
United States11761 Posts
| ||
|
Craton
United States17233 Posts
| ||
|
JackDino
Gabon6219 Posts
On November 22 2011 23:03 mr_tolkien wrote: False. When I duo queue with a friend with a lower Elo than mine, he is ALWAYS last pick. No random here. PS : is it me or EU queue is broken atm ? And him ALWAYS being last pick proves that player 2-4 are higher elo than him how? | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
| ||
|
Southlight
United States11761 Posts
| ||
|
Mogwai
United States13274 Posts
| ||
|
lurked
Canada918 Posts
On November 23 2011 01:48 Southlight wrote: Alternatively you could write TLB backwards. hmmmm just made me hungry ^^ | ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On November 23 2011 00:58 Southlight wrote: Why would you want wards to get stronger??? They should be nerfed like hell D: With CV being awful now, I think it's fine for wards to be good. | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
| ||
|
Shawngood
Germany473 Posts
On November 22 2011 21:34 TheYango wrote: How does it make any goddamn sense to award circuit points in events that were invite-only? That just unfairly skews the circuit toward teams that are well known, and get invited based on being known. They already get a shot at more prize monies--we don't need that also skewing what's ostensibly an open competitive circuit. It's also pretty dodgy to track NA and EU qualification separately, but award points based on standing at events the way they do. Like, SK at IEM Guangzhou and Fnatic at IEM NY had the same placement relative to other European teams (SK beat the other European teams to qualify to go to Guangzhou at all), but Fnatic gets more points for winning IEM NY because IEM Guangzhou had NA/Chinese teams place higher? How well NA/Chinese teams do at events shouldn't affect the relative point values for European teams, especially when the Chinese don't even get their own qualification circuit. Same should be true for NA. Basically WE winning IEM Guangzhou didn't qualify them for anything, while also making CLG and SK's placement worth less, despite the fact that among teams eligible to compete in the Season 2 Circuit, they placed effectively 1st and 2nd. I get the feeling that yet again, Riot didn't think this one all the way through, and got lazy and copy-pasted a lot of stuff from Season 1. Good post. Hope you don't mind if I c&p and forward it. | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On November 23 2011 02:10 NeoIllusions wrote: Run Heal/Flash on support. Heal bait team fights all day. Run Heal+Exhaust/Ignite. Take the bait and wreck. | ||
|
Terranasaur
United States2085 Posts
On November 23 2011 01:19 Craton wrote: Early ganking (aka before your first full clear) you do if A.) The lane is pushed B.) Summoners have been blown / hp is low C.) The champion has retarded scaling (aka Nasus) Some junglers have really strong level 2 ganks (Lee Sin), while others should wait until 3 (Amumu, Rammus) or later. I avoid a level 2 gank if it will impede my ability to clear the jungle. Most junglers can get their full gank arsenal at level 3 and still finish their clear without incident. As rammus, I might clear blue > wraiths and get a level in w q e, then come around from behind the mid lane to gank whatever is there. This will force either a flash or a kill 95% of the time. However, if the lane is pushed into their tower, you will never accomplish a gank, so you just keep clearing your jungle. This. When playing as the Moose, I start blue, hit wolves, and if mid is pushed I ping them, sneak behind, Q-E-W, ezpz. At the very least you do a ton of damage and force a blue pill but I get FB like 90% of the time. Then just finish your clear like a baws. I don't know about other champs though... I really only jungle Rammus. | ||
| ||
