| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
-Zoda-
France3578 Posts
On August 22 2011 23:36 Requizen wrote: But you don't think Lux is good as a mage type for damage? With her CC she seems good for team fights, but I obviously haven't played a whole lot. She lacks damage (maybe because of her ratios) as an AP carry I guess, I'm not specialist though, and almost any champ can carry if mastered. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
| ||
|
daemir
Finland8662 Posts
Tho she is so very fragile, someone gets up to your face and you miss your Q, you're dead. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
On August 23 2011 00:04 daemir wrote: End game her pewpewlazer ult is at 24second cd @ 40% cdr which you get by just blue buff and elixir, so it's a good poke, wave clearer, snipe tool. Tho she is so very fragile, someone gets up to your face and you miss your Q, you're dead. Fragility shouldnt matter on lux. Your spell ranges are so absurd that if you get hit by anyone, you pretty much deserve to die. The best thing about her is the sheer amount of damage she can dish out without ever putting herself in harms way. | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
But yeah, she's fun. I feel like she lacks the "pew pew you're dead" that other carries can pull off, but the control is really nice, especially for assists. | ||
|
LaNague
Germany9118 Posts
Then lategame you can spam your ultimate and be scary. | ||
|
tyCe
Australia2542 Posts
On August 23 2011 00:12 Requizen wrote: Interesting. I suppose I need to just work on my skillshots. Last night I just got frustrated with her because my lane buddy went afk half the match and I was solo v Cho'Gath and Miss Fortune. It was... terrrrrible. But yeah, she's fun. I feel like she lacks the "pew pew you're dead" that other carries can pull off, but the control is really nice, especially for assists. Yeah, that's what I find as well. Lux is really fun to play and offers really good utility in 1v1, skirmishes and big teamfights due to the AoE/multiple-target of all of her skills, but she definitely lacks the insane burst of carries like Annie. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
The main key is to just stay as far back as possible. all her spell ranges are really good, so just spam out your q and e and keep your team in front of you for w. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
On August 23 2011 00:15 tyCe wrote: Yeah, that's what I find as well. Lux is really fun to play and offers really good utility in 1v1, skirmishes and big teamfights due to the AoE/multiple-target of all of her skills, but she definitely lacks the insane burst of carries like Annie. Thats actually false. Her upfront burst is equal to most casters. Her ult is .75 ratio with 500 max base, 7 on q (260 base), and 6 on e (240 base). Annie on the other hand, is 245 base .7 ratio on q, 280 .75 on w, and 450 .7 on tibbers. So she loses .1 ap ratio and has slightly higher base damages than annie. Her cooldowns are longer than annies, but her cc is at least equal, and her spell distances are MUCH better than annies. Lux can sit back and pewpew while annie is stuck having to go ahead and march forward to her death. Combined with the fact that you are likely to get a second ult off in a longer teamfight, Lux actually compares really well. | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
| ||
|
zalz
Netherlands3704 Posts
On August 23 2011 00:08 Two_DoWn wrote: Fragility shouldnt matter on lux. Your spell ranges are so absurd that if you get hit by anyone, you pretty much deserve to die. The best thing about her is the sheer amount of damage she can dish out without ever putting herself in harms way. Flash would still mean you end up dying a ton. Long range does not compensate for being fragile as long as flash remains in the game and it is impossible to adapt a playstyle that deals with a possible sudden change in positioning. Lux is insanely frail wich allready forces her to the bot lane because as an AP on mid her range means nothing against Brand or Orianna, both of wich have identical range but superior travel times on their spells. On bot lane she simply can't fight properly since she has to make use of her passive to deal competitive damage and her auto-atack range is within range of too many champions. On top of this comes the fact that a gank will leave her dead very often. | ||
|
Orpheos
United States1663 Posts
On August 22 2011 23:18 Requizen wrote: So I'm pretty new to LoL, only level 8. I've got good friends to play with, but I'm having trouble deciding which champion to buy first. I much prefer ranged characters, and I like having high damage output. They pointed me at Lux, Ezreal, and Brand. I've been playing Lux (she was free), and she's nice for the utility she brings, but she doesn't really seem to have a big damage ability. Maybe I'm just using her wrong? Or using the wrong build? Are Ezreal and Brand worth buying, or should I wait until they're free to try them out? Or should I stick with Lux and get better? i would stick to free chars or at least only buy the cheaper IP champs at the beginning. your tastes are going to change as you get better | ||
|
HyperionDreamer
Canada1528 Posts
On August 23 2011 00:14 LaNague wrote: u can just build soulstealer with her, cause you are 1km away from a fight and still get all the assists. Then lategame you can spam your ultimate and be scary. Don't ever build soulstealer... It's akin to 4 pooling every game in SC (thanks to whoever used this analogy first, it's awesome), and you'll improve so much faster by learning to play without snowballing items. Soulstealer/Sword of the Occult/Leviathan can work at low levels where a few stacks can change the entire game since people don't know how to stop it, but as you improve and get to higher levels of play, people know how to stop you from stacking. | ||
|
LaNague
Germany9118 Posts
On August 23 2011 01:05 HyperionDreamer wrote: Don't ever build soulstealer... It's akin to 4 pooling every game in SC (thanks to whoever used this analogy first, it's awesome), and you'll improve so much faster by learning to play without snowballing items. Soulstealer/Sword of the Occult/Leviathan can work at low levels where a few stacks can change the entire game since people don't know how to stop it, but as you improve and get to higher levels of play, people know how to stop you from stacking. well, i thought this was about lvl 8, i have stopped building it on my games long ago, even on akali :D | ||
|
Southlight
United States11768 Posts
On August 23 2011 01:05 HyperionDreamer wrote: Don't ever build soulstealer... It's akin to 4 pooling every game in SC (thanks to whoever used this analogy first, it's awesome), and you'll improve so much faster by learning to play without snowballing items. Soulstealer/Sword of the Occult/Leviathan can work at low levels where a few stacks can change the entire game since people don't know how to stop it, but as you improve and get to higher levels of play, people know how to stop you from stacking. Depends on the hero to be honest, even at high levels Soulstealer on Karthus for instance is absolutely brutal. Statikk and I favored (I think he still does?) SS on Kassadin sidelane. The list of such things goes on. | ||
|
gtrsrs
United States9109 Posts
SotO and leviathan are usually pretty bad still | ||
|
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
| ||
|
HyperionDreamer
Canada1528 Posts
On August 23 2011 01:22 Southlight wrote: Depends on the hero to be honest, even at high levels Soulstealer on Karthus for instance is absolutely brutal. Statikk and I favored (I think he still does?) SS on Kassadin sidelane. The list of such things goes on. Maybe Karthus is an exception because of his ulti which allows you to get stacks from the other side of the map.... I still think that a high level team will key on you if you're trying to keep stacks - does anyone know what number of stacks that SS starts to be cost-efficient? | ||
|
nyxnyxnyx
Indonesia2978 Posts
6 ur profitting | ||
| ||
|
|
BSL
Afreeca Starleague
Wardi Open
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
