On February 26 2015 01:41 Elizar wrote: Just because there is no "hard proof" doesn´t automatically make it impossible that there is sth. true about those claims.
On February 26 2015 01:41 Elizar wrote: Just because there is no "hard proof" doesn´t automatically make it impossible that there is sth. true about those claims.
Good thing nobody said that, then.
So suddenly you accept my viewpoint? How did that happen?
On February 26 2015 01:04 piegasm wrote: @ Ricjames
a) I didn't make you do shit. b) You literally just described the community reacting differently to MagicAmy entirely because she's female ("It is perfectly normal and natural behaviour for men to be more interested if it involves woman.") and then claimed that's not sexism. Well done. QED I guess. c) You seem to be working with rather unusual definitions of "rational" and "neutral".
I wouldn't call it a sexism. I would rather say it is a perfectly normal human behaviour. For example if you put one woman inside a group of man, they are interested as much more as if you would put 1 man inside a group of women.
Also there is a huge difference in being interested/curious about someone and treating someone. I stated as a fact that in this case the community (mostly men) are more interested and again i find it perfectly normal. It would be the same if the community was mostly women and MagicAmy was a man. Nowhere did i say that she was treated unequally due to this fact as you claim.
1) Unequal interest in someone, because that someone has the opposite sex - normal, not sexism 2) Unequal treatment of someone, because that someone is the opposite sex - sexism
I said number one is TRUE in this case, but number 2 is not the case. You claim both number 1 and 2 are the case here.
You should stop blaming the community of ruining her carreer as it is simply not true. I consider myself as part of the community, therefore you are blaming me of ruining her carreer. That is what made me react to you spouting feministic non-sense left and right in this thread.
On February 26 2015 01:41 Elizar wrote: Just because there is no "hard proof" doesn´t automatically make it impossible that there is sth. true about those claims.
Good thing nobody said that, then.
So suddenly you accept my viewpoint? How did that happen?
Edit: Substituted "understand" which "accept".
Any time you're ready to engage with things I've actually said, let me know.
On February 26 2015 01:41 Elizar wrote: Just because there is no "hard proof" doesn´t automatically make it impossible that there is sth. true about those claims.
Good thing nobody said that, then.
So suddenly you accept my viewpoint? How did that happen?
Edit: Substituted "understand" which "accept".
Any time you're ready to engage with things I've actually said, let me know.
Nah, I finally conclude I have wasted enough time on that already. Good luck and have fun with your crusade.
On February 26 2015 00:55 Ricjames wrote: Holy shit, you are so annoying that it made me post another reaction. You are comparing two absolutely individual and different cases and here is a simple explanation:
1. HOSTY - random male pro HS player. There are tens of players like him. There is nothing that would make him special. This guy was accused of cheating by watching a stream of the tournament he is participating in. There was nothing else, just cheating in this specific tournament. This case was examined by his team and they came to a conclusion to release him (supposedly not based on the mentioned tournament situation). Still there are people that believe he was innocent and people that say he is guilty. This is not a big deal. One of the many is gone now. No need for further investigation or whatsoever. Nobody cares any more.
You realize that Hostly still plays and competes in tournaments right?
He's not gone at all. But you're right that no one cares that someone who actually cheated in a major tournament (run by his own team in fact) is still around the scene.
To me that's kind of sad.
On the other hand, there's no proof that MagicAmy actually botted / cheated in games. Just that she played around with guys online. Asking for money is not the same as stealing money so let's drop the scammer part (I'm sure each case went down differently, but can we agree she didn't extort guys into sending her money or hack their paypal?). Like I said in my earlier post, being deficient in your personal life hardly means you're going to cheat in your competitive life.
Just look at the SC2 scene quite a lot of those guys fooled around in their personal life and sometimes it even cost them in game (a certain progamer getting dq-ed for missing his match after 'entertaining' a fan the night before comes to mind). But that hardly means they're cheats or should be condemned for being dishonest competitors.
On February 26 2015 00:55 Ricjames wrote: Holy shit, you are so annoying that it made me post another reaction. You are comparing two absolutely individual and different cases and here is a simple explanation:
1. HOSTY - random male pro HS player. There are tens of players like him. There is nothing that would make him special. This guy was accused of cheating by watching a stream of the tournament he is participating in. There was nothing else, just cheating in this specific tournament. This case was examined by his team and they came to a conclusion to release him (supposedly not based on the mentioned tournament situation). Still there are people that believe he was innocent and people that say he is guilty. This is not a big deal. One of the many is gone now. No need for further investigation or whatsoever. Nobody cares any more.
You realize that Hostly still plays and competes in tournaments right?
He's not gone at all. But you're right that no one cares that someone who actually cheated in a major tournament (run by his own team in fact) is still around the scene.
To me that's kind of sad.
On the other hand, there's no proof that MagicAmy actually botted / cheated in games. Just that she played around with guys online. Asking for money is not the same as stealing money so let's drop the scammer part (I'm sure each case went down differently, but can we agree she didn't extort guys into sending her money or hack their paypal?). Like I said in my earlier post, being deficient in your personal life hardly means you're going to cheat in your competitive life.
Just look at the SC2 scene quite a lot of those guys fooled around in their personal life and sometimes it even cost them in game (a certain progamer getting dq-ed for missing his match after 'entertaining' a fan the night before comes to mind). But that hardly means they're cheats or should be condemned for being dishonest competitors.
Ok,ok another one to explain. But i will take it shortly as i don't intend to waste much time. Nobody prevents Hosty to continue playing and nobody does prevent MagicAmy to continue playing. It is their personal choice. Both were released from their teams, despite not stating the true reason. I would distrust both of them in case of online playing. Both of them have the same chance to proof they are good players by attending a LAN tournament (if they are invited or qualified). Also as i already said - Hosty is one among many while Magicamy is supposedly the best female player in the world. Regarding SC2 example, I have no idea what are you talking about as i do not follow SC2 scene at all. However you are again stating absolutely different individual example here which has nothing to do (or is similar in any way) with Magicamy's case.
My point is MagicAmy is being condemned for personal failings, while Hosty was condemned for actual game integrity issues.
The personal failings don't go away if MagicAmy does well in a lan, my point was for other players most keep leave the personal drama out. Yet it's so tied to why people say MagicAmy is guilty of cheating or whatever.
I think it's this distinction that's separating most posters in this thread.
On February 26 2015 04:24 Wuster wrote: My point is MagicAmy is being condemned for personal failings, while Hosty was condemned for actual game integrity issues.
The personal failings don't go away if MagicAmy does well in a lan, my point was for other players most keep leave the personal drama out. Yet it's so tied to why people say MagicAmy is guilty of cheating or whatever.
I think it's this distinction that's separating most posters in this thread.
I repeat these are 2 totally different and individual cases and you can't really compare them.
Hosty was condemned for actual game integrity issue - that is true. But the issue was that he cheated in a streamed tournament by watching the stream. This does not show or imply in any way that his achievements,records in HS in other cases (not streamed tournaments, not streamed online games, ladder, he played LANs before if i am not mistaken) were accomplished due to cheating.
MagicAmy on the other hand is suspected of being a complete fraud and that all her achievements might have been accomplished thanks to cheating in some way. This is much more severe accustation than in Hosty's case. This combined with her being "the best" an him being one among many, is the reason why people react as they do.
On February 26 2015 04:24 Wuster wrote: My point is MagicAmy is being condemned for personal failings, while Hosty was condemned for actual game integrity issues.
The personal failings don't go away if MagicAmy does well in a lan, my point was for other players most keep leave the personal drama out. Yet it's so tied to why people say MagicAmy is guilty of cheating or whatever.
I think it's this distinction that's separating most posters in this thread.
I repeat these are 2 totally different and individual cases and you can't really compare them.
Hosty was condemned for actual game integrity issue - that is true. But the issue was that he cheated in a streamed tournament by watching the stream. This does not show or imply in any way that his achievements,records in HS in other cases (not streamed tournaments, not streamed online games, ladder, he played LANs before if i am not mistaken) were accomplished due to cheating.
MagicAmy on the other hand is suspected of being a complete fraud and that all her achievements might have been accomplished thanks to cheating in some way. This is much more severe accustation than in Hosty's case. This combined with her being "the best" an him being one among many, is the reason why people react as they do.
You have completely lost the plot. So, Hosty actually being caught actually doing something which could result in an unfair advantage IN NO WAY implies that he ever did anything wrong on any other occasion while a bunch of ignorant assholes making wild, unsubstantiated claims and airing personal grievances is compelling evidence that everything MagicAmy ever did in Hearthstone was faked? And this OK because Hosty is one among many dudes while MagicAmy was hailed as the best female player? Is that the narrative? You're a complete joke.
On February 26 2015 01:41 Elizar wrote: Just because there is no "hard proof" doesn´t automatically make it impossible that there is sth. true about those claims.
Good thing nobody said that, then.
So suddenly you accept my viewpoint? How did that happen?
Edit: Substituted "understand" which "accept".
Any time you're ready to engage with things I've actually said, let me know.
Nah, I finally conclude I have wasted enough time on that already. Good luck and have fun with your crusade.
Yeah, it's much simpler to just make shit up than to represent honestly what your interlocutors have said. I feel your pain, bro. Really, I do.
On February 26 2015 01:41 Elizar wrote: Just because there is no "hard proof" doesn´t automatically make it impossible that there is sth. true about those claims.
Good thing nobody said that, then.
So suddenly you accept my viewpoint? How did that happen?
Edit: Substituted "understand" which "accept".
Any time you're ready to engage with things I've actually said, let me know.
Nah, I finally conclude I have wasted enough time on that already. Good luck and have fun with your crusade.
Yeah, it's much simpler to just make shit up than to represent honestly what your interlocutors have said. I feel your pain, bro. Really, I do.
I´m the one who treats that story as a joke, remember? You´re the one who wants to take on the internet. Sooo .... I´m not the one who feels any pain here. And you made shit up, too. Guess you dont even see it, "bro". Btw. I have two brothers. You´re not one of them
So Elizar, a friend just told me that you have sex with goats. I'm not saying that you actually do have sex with goats, but my friend says he has proof and why would he lie?
Can you prove his accusations wrong? I mean, it seems simple enough that if you don't have sex with goats that you would easily show us that you don't have sex with goats and his accusation is wrong.
I am going to be highly suspicious though if you choose not to prove these claims wrong. What would you have to hide? That seems fishy if you can't prove these accusations wrong.
I'll be waiting for you to choose to prove these accusations wrong under your own free will. Remember, I am not saying that you actually do have sex with goats, but if you don't prove these accusations incorrect, then I wonder why?
On February 27 2015 05:28 litlnoobs wrote: So Elizar, a friend just told me that you have sex with goats. I'm not saying that you actually do have sex with goats, but my friend says he has proof and why would he lie?
Can you prove his accusations wrong? I mean, it seems simple enough that if you don't have sex with goats that you would easily show us that you don't have sex with goats and his accusation is wrong.
I am going to be highly suspicious though if you choose not to prove these claims wrong. What would you have to hide? That seems fishy if you can't prove these accusations wrong.
I'll be waiting for you to choose to prove these accusations wrong under your own free will. Remember, I am not saying that you actually do have sex with goats, but if you don't prove these accusations incorrect, then I wonder why?
Your friend is a liar. Goats? Please ..... Sheeps are the thing! More fluffy u know ...
I heard people wanted to improve the community. As it is now I become a troll. Thats said, isn´t it? I do hate trolls and never considered me being one and now I turn into one. Sheeps on the other hand ... so fluffy I´m gonna die! Let´s all become sheeps. Maybe explosive ones.
You know why I don´t even consider your accusations worthy a real response? Guess! You´re so smart I´m sure you will figure it out yourself !!
On February 27 2015 05:28 litlnoobs wrote: So Elizar, a friend just told me that you have sex with goats. I'm not saying that you actually do have sex with goats, but my friend says he has proof and why would he lie?
Can you prove his accusations wrong? I mean, it seems simple enough that if you don't have sex with goats that you would easily show us that you don't have sex with goats and his accusation is wrong.
I am going to be highly suspicious though if you choose not to prove these claims wrong. What would you have to hide? That seems fishy if you can't prove these accusations wrong.
I'll be waiting for you to choose to prove these accusations wrong under your own free will. Remember, I am not saying that you actually do have sex with goats, but if you don't prove these accusations incorrect, then I wonder why?
how exactly do you show you dont have sex with goats? moreover, how do you prove a negative?
On February 27 2015 05:28 litlnoobs wrote: So Elizar, a friend just told me that you have sex with goats. I'm not saying that you actually do have sex with goats, but my friend says he has proof and why would he lie?
Can you prove his accusations wrong? I mean, it seems simple enough that if you don't have sex with goats that you would easily show us that you don't have sex with goats and his accusation is wrong.
I am going to be highly suspicious though if you choose not to prove these claims wrong. What would you have to hide? That seems fishy if you can't prove these accusations wrong.
I'll be waiting for you to choose to prove these accusations wrong under your own free will. Remember, I am not saying that you actually do have sex with goats, but if you don't prove these accusations incorrect, then I wonder why?
how exactly do you show you dont have sex with goats? moreover, how do you prove a negative?
That's his whole point I guess...
On a serious note, I actually was told that once, in the office of a public health insurance company: That I would have to prove that a person never had private health insurance.
The goat thing isn't relevant here because magicamy can easily prove she's the one playing her account. Just release a video of her playing games on her account! Or show up to a live event. We know she has a webcam. She didn't even try, which is strange for someone who started their own Hearthstone team, and willingly joined Tempo storm. You would expect that a hearthstone pro or aspiring pro when accused of not playing their own games, would laugh and try to prove everyone wrong. That's why people are convinced she's a fraud.
On February 27 2015 14:54 stink123 wrote: The goat thing isn't relevant here because magicamy can easily prove she's the one playing her account. Just release a video of her playing games on her account! Or show up to a live event. We know she has a webcam. She didn't even try, which is strange for someone who started their own Hearthstone team, and willingly joined Tempo storm. You would expect that a hearthstone pro or aspiring pro when accused of not playing their own games, would laugh and try to prove everyone wrong. That's why people are convinced she's a fraud.
YOU would expect that. People who are actually acquainted with actual, reasonable human behavior would think that someone in that position might very well tell the Hearthstone community to go fuck its collective self and find something else to do with their life that doesn't require them to prove their worth to a bunch of howling man-children who will believe anything they read on the internet unless it involves a woman actually deserving whatever success she's achieved.
Um, isn't that the exact opposite of how you act towards an actual reasonable human being? If someone says "I don't believe you play Hearthstone" wouldn't you show them your hearthstone account? Not curse them out and throw a tantrum as you suggest.
Like with any community, respect must be earned, and maintained. When someone publicly calls you out, and you don't respond, the community will respect you less. Doubly so when you're on a team, and your TEAM asks you to respond. Not only do you let down your fans, but also your teammates and team as well. There's no way I could respect magicamy after this, because she treated people who cheered for her, and her team like trash. If instead, she had released a video of her playing her account and destroying people (or just showed up to an offline event), then she could've kept her spot on the team, and no one could reasonably doubt her authenticity.
Also, people regularly make videos showing them playing when people don't believe them. Here's one for example:
On February 28 2015 10:40 stink123 wrote: Um, isn't that the exact opposite of how you act towards an actual reasonable human being? If someone says "I don't believe you play Hearthstone" wouldn't you show them your hearthstone account? Not curse them out and throw a tantrum as you suggest.
Like with any community, respect must be earned, and maintained. When someone publicly calls you out, and you don't respond, the community will respect you less. Doubly so when you're on a team, and your TEAM asks you to respond. Not only do you let down your fans, but also your teammates and team as well. There's no way I could respect magicamy after this, because she treated people who cheered for her, and her team like trash. If instead, she had released a video of her playing her account and destroying people (or just showed up to an offline event), then she could've kept her spot on the team, and no one could reasonably doubt her authenticity.
You've actually just perfectly illustrated why this whole situation pisses me off. What happened here is that a few assholes tried to throw someone under the bus based on breathtakingly flimsy evidence. They don't seem to have wasted a single instant thinking about the impact they were having on a real human being's life. They posted their chat logs to Twitter, fanned the flames lit by Specialist, whipped the community into such a frenzy that TempoStorm was eventually forced to investigate. And TempoStorm says they found nothing. But nobody believes TempoStorm who had access to real evidence beyond a chat log and the word of a couple of assholes who thought airing this shit on reddit and twitter was a perfectly OK thing to do. Wild, unsubstantiated claims on the other hand and the word of those assholes? That's totally believable. Because reasons.
What you have here is a few people purposely whipping up a very large internet community against another person. People whose only evidence is some chat logs and a screen shot of a bank statement. People whose stories don't even agree with each other (some think Amy is two people, some don't). And the victim of this witch hunt is the one who you apparently think needs to earn respect back. That is seriously fucked up.