link
Even in the US, I don't think this one will fly. Still, where else on Earth would someone even consider such a lawsuit?
Forum Index > General Forum |
qrs
United States3637 Posts
link Even in the US, I don't think this one will fly. Still, where else on Earth would someone even consider such a lawsuit? | ||
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:32 qrs wrote: Apparently they did not do enough to help her find a job. She wants her tuition back. link Even the US, I don't think this one will fly. Still, where else on Earth would someone even consider such a lawsuit? the fact that she's suing may have something to do with her lack of employment ~~ | ||
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
| ||
KO_SharpMind
Canada277 Posts
| ||
Husky
United States3362 Posts
I can kind of see why she might be upset, if they did indeed promise her a service that they simply didnt provide. I just think this will be one of the stories that people read the title but not the actual story. I'm not saying I agree with her here I just 100% think this one is skewed by the media. | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:33 Slaughter)BiO wrote: Well sure; that's what's wrong with the system.There will always be people looking to get stuff the easy way. The US system just allows for it. On the other hand, to be fair, it's hard to say what system would be definitively better. Juries of one's peers have their points. Judges, for instance, are subject to corruption. Maybe punitive damages should be done away with altogether. | ||
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:35 KO_SharpMind wrote: WoW, only in America, there's is only so much a school can do in helping someone find a job, she needs to realize that. some school guarantee a job upon graduation... | ||
![]()
Manifesto7
Osaka27149 Posts
| ||
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
| ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42780 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. | ||
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
| ||
![]()
Manifesto7
Osaka27149 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Sorry ![]() OMG WTF AMERICA CHOBO COUNTRY RAGE RAGE RAGE /righteous indignation | ||
eXigent.
Canada2419 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:48 Slaughter)BiO wrote: It depends on what they promised from what they actually delivered. I don't know anything about this college but some advertise how like 99% of their grads have jobs and they will help you get a job. If they promised a lot and delivered shit then yea she might have a case for false advertising/hope/w/e. I agree , if they said guaranteed job placement after graduation, then yeah she has a right to be pissed if they didn't follow through. Of course there are TONS of other variables that could lead to it being totally her fault, but of course none of that is mentioned | ||
Brett
Australia3820 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Never fear; there's plenty of idiocy in the "Koreans beat the shit out of some dude" thread! | ||
Husky
United States3362 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Seriously WTF is up with Archons on this site? I think they are just naturally more funny than, say, a zergling (Zealots are always hilarious BTW). I was actually hoping for a little more drama to be honest. But all you jerks have to actually go and read/analyze the article to formulate an educated opinion. Very disappointing ![]() | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42780 Posts
| ||
MaZza[KIS]
Australia2110 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:55 HuskyTheHusky wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Seriously WTF is up with Archons on this site? I think they are just naturally more funny than, say, a zergling (Zealots are always hilarious BTW). I was actually hoping for a little more drama to be honest. But all you jerks have to actually go and read/analyze the article to formulate an educated opinion. Very disappointing ![]() Years of posting on this forum transmute your mind. If you've been on TL.net long enough you learn to read the general course of threads from the OP. You're bound to stumble on something witty at some point besides the general "OMG NOOB AMERICAN TRYING TO GET MONEY, DIE IN PLANE CRASH YOU FAT HAMBURGER". | ||
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
The system can't support the consequences should she win this case. This sort of precedent must be avoided at all cost. Oh ya... GO america! | ||
![]()
Manifesto7
Osaka27149 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:55 Brett wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Never fear; there's plenty of idiocy in the "Koreans beat the shit out of some dude" thread! Very true. Maybe if we all work together, logic and reasoning can be the new TL meme in the general section. | ||
funkie
Venezuela9376 Posts
On August 04 2009 12:08 Manifesto7 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 11:55 Brett wrote: On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Never fear; there's plenty of idiocy in the "Koreans beat the shit out of some dude" thread! Very true. Maybe if we all work together, logic and reasoning can be the new TL meme in the general section. Oh God, please no... ![]() | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42780 Posts
On August 04 2009 12:08 Manifesto7 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 11:55 Brett wrote: On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Never fear; there's plenty of idiocy in the "Koreans beat the shit out of some dude" thread! Very true. Maybe if we all work together, logic and reasoning can be the new TL meme in the general section. Trying to one up me on ridiculousness? | ||
funkie
Venezuela9376 Posts
| ||
RushWifDietCoke
United States488 Posts
1. The girl was promised in writing that they would get her a job. 2. The college did not provide her service that was available to the rest of the students (unfair treatment). This is just my estimate of how it will go BASED on the information that has been given (not a lot). On a side note, I don't see how this is a good move on her part either way. If she wins the case great for her, but after companies hear about her suing the school she will have an even more difficult time finding a job. I'm not sure I know of any companies that would be eager to higher an employee known lawsuits. (keeping in mind that there are discrimination laws but these have so many loopholes they can be avoided.). If she loses the case well obviously it wouldn't be a good move on her part considering the expenses for the lawsuit as well as her reputation ruined for falsely accusing the school. | ||
![]()
Last Romantic
United States20661 Posts
Ergo, I will err on the side of favouring the school here. Naturally, alumni networks/other programs are available at many universities, and these assist in job searches - but these are no foolproof way to find a job. Girl sues college for her incompetence, imo. | ||
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:38 HuskyTheHusky wrote: Well I think this particular story is blown a little out of proportion. Sure, I think its silly to sue the school for your inability to find a job, but at the same time you dont know the whole story. America loves drama stories and they are trying to turn this into one as well. I can kind of see why she might be upset, if they did indeed promise her a service that they simply didnt provide. I just think this will be one of the stories that people read the title but not the actual story. I'm not saying I agree with her here I just 100% think this one is skewed by the media. Since when is a promise a binding contract? | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42780 Posts
On August 04 2009 12:14 Aegraen wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 11:38 HuskyTheHusky wrote: Well I think this particular story is blown a little out of proportion. Sure, I think its silly to sue the school for your inability to find a job, but at the same time you dont know the whole story. America loves drama stories and they are trying to turn this into one as well. I can kind of see why she might be upset, if they did indeed promise her a service that they simply didnt provide. I just think this will be one of the stories that people read the title but not the actual story. I'm not saying I agree with her here I just 100% think this one is skewed by the media. Since when is a promise a binding contract? When that promise is in the form of an advertisment and the consumer parts with their money. | ||
Avidkeystamper
United States8552 Posts
| ||
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On August 04 2009 12:16 Kwark wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 12:14 Aegraen wrote: On August 04 2009 11:38 HuskyTheHusky wrote: Well I think this particular story is blown a little out of proportion. Sure, I think its silly to sue the school for your inability to find a job, but at the same time you dont know the whole story. America loves drama stories and they are trying to turn this into one as well. I can kind of see why she might be upset, if they did indeed promise her a service that they simply didnt provide. I just think this will be one of the stories that people read the title but not the actual story. I'm not saying I agree with her here I just 100% think this one is skewed by the media. Since when is a promise a binding contract? When that promise is in the form of an advertisment and the consumer parts with their money. She bought with her money an education. She didn't buy a job, or employment. | ||
funkie
Venezuela9376 Posts
On August 04 2009 12:18 Avidkeystamper wrote: If I could have 3 wishes, one would be the ability to slap anyone who makes stupid lawsuits as much as I want. this. | ||
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On August 04 2009 12:18 Avidkeystamper wrote: If I could have 3 wishes, one would be the ability to slap anyone who makes stupid lawsuits as much as I want. wise choice sir. I think your arms might get tired after a while though.. | ||
funkie
Venezuela9376 Posts
| ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On August 04 2009 12:21 Aegraen wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 12:16 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 12:14 Aegraen wrote: On August 04 2009 11:38 HuskyTheHusky wrote: Well I think this particular story is blown a little out of proportion. Sure, I think its silly to sue the school for your inability to find a job, but at the same time you dont know the whole story. America loves drama stories and they are trying to turn this into one as well. I can kind of see why she might be upset, if they did indeed promise her a service that they simply didnt provide. I just think this will be one of the stories that people read the title but not the actual story. I'm not saying I agree with her here I just 100% think this one is skewed by the media. Since when is a promise a binding contract? When that promise is in the form of an advertisment and the consumer parts with their money. She bought with her money an education. She didn't buy a job, or employment. if they promise a job placement within X months after graduation alongside education, then yes in fact, she did. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42780 Posts
On August 04 2009 12:21 Aegraen wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 12:16 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 12:14 Aegraen wrote: On August 04 2009 11:38 HuskyTheHusky wrote: Well I think this particular story is blown a little out of proportion. Sure, I think its silly to sue the school for your inability to find a job, but at the same time you dont know the whole story. America loves drama stories and they are trying to turn this into one as well. I can kind of see why she might be upset, if they did indeed promise her a service that they simply didnt provide. I just think this will be one of the stories that people read the title but not the actual story. I'm not saying I agree with her here I just 100% think this one is skewed by the media. Since when is a promise a binding contract? When that promise is in the form of an advertisment and the consumer parts with their money. She bought with her money an education. She didn't buy a job, or employment. If she was advertised an education and she bought it then fair enough. If she was advertised an institution which educates and attempts to find work for its students and all she got was an education then she has a case. As has already been stated in the topic, we don't know the full facts. | ||
b3h47pte
United States1317 Posts
On August 04 2009 12:24 funkie wrote: No worries, he'd have us to back him up! he would have most of the world...besides that person who sued mcdonalds for making him/her fat. ![]() i think it would be easier for the girl to try and find a job by herself than trying to sue her way to getting...money? most likely not a job - -; | ||
sdvc
United States91 Posts
Her degree is in "business administration degree in information technology" Not really hard for me to connect the dots here Plus she's 27 and just graduated, she probably doesn't have any work experience Here's the article http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/08/03/new.york.jobless.graduate/index.html | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42780 Posts
On August 04 2009 13:23 sdvc wrote: If you read this story on cnn she has a 2.7 gpa Her degree is in "business administration degree in information technology" Not really hard for me to connect the dots here Plus she's 27 and just graduated, she probably doesn't have any work experience Which might explain her decision to invest her money into an institution that offered to find her work. As stated before, it comes down to whether they didn't provide a service they agreed to, not how unemployable she is. And given we don't know that, her unemployability changes nothing. | ||
sdvc
United States91 Posts
| ||
ActualSteve
United States627 Posts
| ||
![]()
Empyrean
16989 Posts
As Thompson sees it, any reasonable employer would pounce on an applicant with her academic credentials, which include a 2.7 grade-point average and a solid attendance record. But Monroe's career-services department has put forth insufficient effort to help her secure employment, she claims. "They're supposed to say, 'I got this student, her attendance is good, her GPA is all right -- can you interview this person?' They're not doing that," she said. Any employer would pounce on a 2.7 GPA applicant with a more or less useless degree? :/ EDIT: In this job market, I mean. Who's looking to hire people with a business degree in IT? | ||
Kurosaki
United States158 Posts
She suggested that Monroe's Office of Career Advancement shows preferential treatment to students with excellent grades. "They favor more toward students that got a 4.0. They help them more out with the job placement," she said. I got a 2.7 GPA but they denied my interview for medical school. Some other kid with a 4.0 GPA got the interview. I don't know why they would favor those types of people over me. My attendance is solid as a rock! That has to be a big plus. | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
| ||
errol1001
454 Posts
I found my job through craigslist though. I don't know how many people land their jobs through the university services, but it's probably a good amount. I doubt this is worth discussing beyond the offhand comment about how stupid she is (I can't imagine the university made this guarantee of employment). She'll probably rack up some lawyer bills, and be further in the hole. In the end, she'll be rightly punished for what she's doing.. | ||
Wangsta
United States776 Posts
On August 04 2009 13:57 Kurosaki wrote: Show nested quote + She suggested that Monroe's Office of Career Advancement shows preferential treatment to students with excellent grades. "They favor more toward students that got a 4.0. They help them more out with the job placement," she said. I got a 2.7 GPA but they denied my interview for medical school. Some other kid with a 4.0 GPA got the interview. I don't know why they would favor those types of people over me. My attendance is solid as a rock! That has to be a big plus. That's terrible. You're clearly being discriminated against. If I were you, I'd go sue that medical school for racism. and sexism too. why not | ||
rredtooth
5459 Posts
I will be responsible for repaying my loan even if I do not graduate, am not satisfied with my education, or do not get a bill. Reminded me of this story. | ||
inReacH
Sweden1612 Posts
On August 04 2009 12:24 funkie wrote: No worries, he'd have us to back him up! Then the victims would sue because that wasn't included in his wish gg | ||
DrainX
Sweden3187 Posts
On August 04 2009 12:01 MaZza[KIS] wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 11:55 HuskyTheHusky wrote: On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Seriously WTF is up with Archons on this site? I think they are just naturally more funny than, say, a zergling (Zealots are always hilarious BTW). I was actually hoping for a little more drama to be honest. But all you jerks have to actually go and read/analyze the article to formulate an educated opinion. Very disappointing ![]() Years of posting on this forum transmute your mind. If you've been on TL.net long enough you learn to read the general course of threads from the OP. You're bound to stumble on something witty at some point besides the general "OMG NOOB AMERICAN TRYING TO GET MONEY, DIE IN PLANE CRASH YOU FAT HAMBURGER". It was actually "DIE IN LONG BUILDING, FAT HAMBURGER" ![]() | ||
NExUS1g
United States254 Posts
| ||
![]()
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
ghostWriter
United States3302 Posts
On August 05 2009 10:58 DrainX wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 12:01 MaZza[KIS] wrote: On August 04 2009 11:55 HuskyTheHusky wrote: On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Seriously WTF is up with Archons on this site? I think they are just naturally more funny than, say, a zergling (Zealots are always hilarious BTW). I was actually hoping for a little more drama to be honest. But all you jerks have to actually go and read/analyze the article to formulate an educated opinion. Very disappointing ![]() Years of posting on this forum transmute your mind. If you've been on TL.net long enough you learn to read the general course of threads from the OP. You're bound to stumble on something witty at some point besides the general "OMG NOOB AMERICAN TRYING TO GET MONEY, DIE IN PLANE CRASH YOU FAT HAMBURGER". It was actually "DIE IN LONG BUILDING, FAT HAMBURGER" ![]() I looked it up and it was "fuckign maerican die in twin tower fat hamburger" | ||
ghostWriter
United States3302 Posts
On August 05 2009 21:04 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: i saw the fattest girl today There's a show about really fat girls, bachelor-style, called More To Love. I saw like 10 minutes of it and it was just awful... | ||
dhe95
United States1213 Posts
Then she talks about how people who do better in school than her get the job interviews. I wonder if she notices that just because the college asks a company to interview someone, doesn't mean they have to. | ||
Alizee-
United States845 Posts
| ||
ChaseR
Norway1004 Posts
Something about that they will let anyone in, "educate" them in a profession, promise to help them find that job/position and when you graduate 'dump' you and leave you stuck with 200k $$$ in debt that you will have to earn back working at burger king. -_____- (Something in that direction, basically society is a bitch, money and results is all it wants at your expense and life.) | ||
Xusneb
Canada612 Posts
On August 05 2009 21:13 ghostWriter wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2009 10:58 DrainX wrote: On August 04 2009 12:01 MaZza[KIS] wrote: On August 04 2009 11:55 HuskyTheHusky wrote: On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Seriously WTF is up with Archons on this site? I think they are just naturally more funny than, say, a zergling (Zealots are always hilarious BTW). I was actually hoping for a little more drama to be honest. But all you jerks have to actually go and read/analyze the article to formulate an educated opinion. Very disappointing ![]() Years of posting on this forum transmute your mind. If you've been on TL.net long enough you learn to read the general course of threads from the OP. You're bound to stumble on something witty at some point besides the general "OMG NOOB AMERICAN TRYING TO GET MONEY, DIE IN PLANE CRASH YOU FAT HAMBURGER". It was actually "DIE IN LONG BUILDING, FAT HAMBURGER" ![]() I looked it up and it was "fuckign maerican die in twin tower fat hamburger" People killing people dying Children hurtin you hear them crying Can you practice what you preach Would you turn the other cheek? Father Father Father help us Send some guidance from above Cause people got me got me questioning Where is the GOTTA GET-GET GOTTA GET-GET BOOM BOOM BOOM Oh yea, this article was really quite unbelievable. Until Manifesto dissected it and now it's just meh. | ||
![]()
thedeadhaji
![]()
39489 Posts
| ||
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
| ||
LuckyOne
266 Posts
On August 05 2009 10:58 DrainX wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 12:01 MaZza[KIS] wrote: On August 04 2009 11:55 HuskyTheHusky wrote: On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Seriously WTF is up with Archons on this site? I think they are just naturally more funny than, say, a zergling (Zealots are always hilarious BTW). I was actually hoping for a little more drama to be honest. But all you jerks have to actually go and read/analyze the article to formulate an educated opinion. Very disappointing ![]() Years of posting on this forum transmute your mind. If you've been on TL.net long enough you learn to read the general course of threads from the OP. You're bound to stumble on something witty at some point besides the general "OMG NOOB AMERICAN TRYING TO GET MONEY, DIE IN PLANE CRASH YOU FAT HAMBURGER". It was actually "DIE IN LONG BUILDING, FAT HAMBURGER" ![]() you are confusing with "me love you long time" | ||
despite
Bulgaria105 Posts
| ||
uiCk
Canada1925 Posts
| ||
uiCk
Canada1925 Posts
On August 05 2009 21:13 ghostWriter wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2009 10:58 DrainX wrote: On August 04 2009 12:01 MaZza[KIS] wrote: On August 04 2009 11:55 HuskyTheHusky wrote: On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Seriously WTF is up with Archons on this site? I think they are just naturally more funny than, say, a zergling (Zealots are always hilarious BTW). I was actually hoping for a little more drama to be honest. But all you jerks have to actually go and read/analyze the article to formulate an educated opinion. Very disappointing ![]() Years of posting on this forum transmute your mind. If you've been on TL.net long enough you learn to read the general course of threads from the OP. You're bound to stumble on something witty at some point besides the general "OMG NOOB AMERICAN TRYING TO GET MONEY, DIE IN PLANE CRASH YOU FAT HAMBURGER". It was actually "DIE IN LONG BUILDING, FAT HAMBURGER" ![]() I looked it up and it was "fuckign maerican die in twin tower fat hamburger" wheres this from? | ||
ninjafetus
United States231 Posts
http://www.theskichannel.com/news/gear/20090804/The-Ski-Channel-Offers-Job-to-Jobless-Graduate-Suing-Monroe-College | ||
Krikkitone
United States1451 Posts
On August 06 2009 01:48 ninjafetus wrote: This is amazing: http://www.theskichannel.com/news/gear/20090804/The-Ski-Channel-Offers-Job-to-Jobless-Graduate-Suing-Monroe-College Well it sounds like she found an interesting way to get a job offer from the article "Either Ms Thompson is a cunning out of the box thinker and we want her," said Bellamy "or she isn't, and her postiion would not last long. " | ||
LuckyOne
266 Posts
On August 06 2009 01:41 uiCk wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2009 21:13 ghostWriter wrote: On August 05 2009 10:58 DrainX wrote: On August 04 2009 12:01 MaZza[KIS] wrote: On August 04 2009 11:55 HuskyTheHusky wrote: On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Seriously WTF is up with Archons on this site? I think they are just naturally more funny than, say, a zergling (Zealots are always hilarious BTW). I was actually hoping for a little more drama to be honest. But all you jerks have to actually go and read/analyze the article to formulate an educated opinion. Very disappointing ![]() Years of posting on this forum transmute your mind. If you've been on TL.net long enough you learn to read the general course of threads from the OP. You're bound to stumble on something witty at some point besides the general "OMG NOOB AMERICAN TRYING TO GET MONEY, DIE IN PLANE CRASH YOU FAT HAMBURGER". It was actually "DIE IN LONG BUILDING, FAT HAMBURGER" ![]() I looked it up and it was "fuckign maerican die in twin tower fat hamburger" wheres this from? from some french wc3 player i think | ||
psion0011
Canada720 Posts
On August 06 2009 01:48 ninjafetus wrote: This is amazing: http://www.theskichannel.com/news/gear/20090804/The-Ski-Channel-Offers-Job-to-Jobless-Graduate-Suing-Monroe-College Hahaha now she gets her case thrown out of court to fetch coffee at $7.50 an hour. For about a week. | ||
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On August 06 2009 04:14 psion0011 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2009 01:48 ninjafetus wrote: This is amazing: http://www.theskichannel.com/news/gear/20090804/The-Ski-Channel-Offers-Job-to-Jobless-Graduate-Suing-Monroe-College Hahaha now she gets her case thrown out of court to fetch coffee at $7.50 an hour. For about a week. really thats all shes getting paid? kinda blows | ||
EGLzGaMeR
United States1867 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. this~ perfectly said mani ! | ||
![]()
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On August 06 2009 01:48 ninjafetus wrote: This is amazing: http://www.theskichannel.com/news/gear/20090804/The-Ski-Channel-Offers-Job-to-Jobless-Graduate-Suing-Monroe-College Just a publicity stunt. Clever way for the Ski Channel to get their name on the front page. | ||
Slithe
United States985 Posts
http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/money-trail/2009/08/12/sue-school?page=0,0 I'm inclined to say that this is a case of exploitation, not just another retard looking to win a ridiculous lawsuit. | ||
WWJDD
India342 Posts
| ||
![]()
DivinO
United States4796 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:51 Manifesto7 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2009 11:48 Kwark wrote: On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. Way to deflate any drama out of the story with reason.... Might as well close this now. No fun to be had here. Sorry ![]() OMG WTF AMERICA CHOBO COUNTRY RAGE RAGE RAGE /righteous indignation Counter rage! Insult about mother! Riposte! In all honesty, I think the college really should do more to find her a job. | ||
XsebT
Denmark2980 Posts
![]() With love from Denmark. | ||
Eniram
Sudan3166 Posts
On September 01 2009 03:28 XsebT wrote: "Paying for going to college" is LOL HAHA LOL. ![]() With love from Denmark. It may cost money but our colleges are some of the best in the world so its worth it to me. | ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On August 06 2009 04:17 StorrZerg wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2009 04:14 psion0011 wrote: On August 06 2009 01:48 ninjafetus wrote: This is amazing: http://www.theskichannel.com/news/gear/20090804/The-Ski-Channel-Offers-Job-to-Jobless-Graduate-Suing-Monroe-College Hahaha now she gets her case thrown out of court to fetch coffee at $7.50 an hour. For about a week. really thats all shes getting paid? kinda blows Beggars can't be choosers... | ||
![]()
Empyrean
16989 Posts
On September 01 2009 04:02 Eniram wrote: Show nested quote + On September 01 2009 03:28 XsebT wrote: "Paying for going to college" is LOL HAHA LOL. ![]() With love from Denmark. It may cost money but our colleges are some of the best in the world so its worth it to me. The reputation of those Sudanese colleges, I see. | ||
MuffinDude
United States3837 Posts
| ||
coltrane
Chile988 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:46 Manifesto7 wrote: If the college promised to help with finding jobs for graduates, and indeed uses that as a way to attract students, then why should they not be held accountable when they do not? In both the linked article and the BBC article, there are precious few details as to the claim, basically a he said she said argument. In the end, if it turns out they did not meet their commitments to helping her, then she has a case. I agree 100% Is so sad for me to see a lot of young people blindly thinking about such a thing like private education. A major universitty here once opened a career program on forensic and criminalistic research the same year than the justice system was reformed. They offered some new career focused on filling the new job spots in our justice. Was a major fail, those spots never existed and one year before the first generation graduated they found that nothing that they learned had any use in the system. An average salary here is about $4000 usd a year per family, but most of the people live with $3000 less taxes. We dont have college. For any decent career you need something like $3000 each term. That is an average fulltime job salary for one year each term of your 4 years studing. Any of those kids have any job today. And huge debts with the school. I am saying that I am with the girl. Fuck the people who make bussiness on other people`s education. This is a political lawsuit, not a comercial one. | ||
MuffinDude
United States3837 Posts
To make it even worse, 70,000? Wtf? Thats like how much you pay in 4 years at a top tier college like stanford. Really? How the hell do you spend 70,000? What the hell did she do? Spend 20 dollars per meal? She apparently didn't even work part time and all. And she didn't do much in class and got her grade mostly through group work. Are you fcking serious? At her last year, she probably was like oh, i'm graduating, time to look for a job. She could of at least gotten internship for experience, but she doesn't have any. She then goes on blaming the college when its pratically impossible to find a job right now. There are people who spend years repaying their tuition fees and they usually only hold part time jobs coming out of college. Many people have the same degree as she does and have a much better gpa then 2.7 and yet they are still jobless. Many already have had a job and lost their job and are losing their homes. She really needs to wake up to the current situation and not act like a snob. The lawsuit would be much better if a person was to have great grades and spent at least a year looking for jobs after graduation. | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On September 01 2009 14:19 MuffinDude wrote: To make it even worse, 70,000? Wtf? Thats like how much you pay in 4 years at a top tier college like stanford. Really? How the hell do you spend 70,000? What the hell did she do? Spend 20 dollars per meal?. ... what? edit: i just re-read your whole post again and i .. i just don't know if you're serious i hope not | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42780 Posts
On September 01 2009 14:19 MuffinDude wrote: I just read into it more and I have one thing to say. WOW. I'm still in high school, but one thing I do know is that 2.7 gpa is terrible. Thats worse than my school's unweighted gpa average. She blames that her college isn't landing her with any interviews but really? Thats like saying how its complete bullshit that she didn't get into harvard with 2.7 gpa and absolutely no extra curriculum. To make it even worse, 70,000? Wtf? Thats like how much you pay in 4 years at a top tier college like stanford. Really? How the hell do you spend 70,000? What the hell did she do? Spend 20 dollars per meal? She apparently didn't even work part time and all. And she didn't do much in class and got her grade mostly through group work. Are you fcking serious? At her last year, she probably was like oh, i'm graduating, time to look for a job. She could of at least gotten internship for experience, but she doesn't have any. She then goes on blaming the college when its pratically impossible to find a job right now. There are people who spend years repaying their tuition fees and they usually only hold part time jobs coming out of college. Many people have the same degree as she does and have a much better gpa then 2.7 and yet they are still jobless. Many already have had a job and lost their job and are losing their homes. She really needs to wake up to the current situation and not act like a snob. The lawsuit would be much better if a person was to have great grades and spent at least a year looking for jobs after graduation. Her point was that the careers office is completely ignoring her and instead focussing on people with better grades who they can help more easily. This makes sense for the college because if you devote a day to getting interviews for top candidates you'll have more success than spending the same time getting interviews for mediocre ones. But if they both pay the same fees for the same service then the careers office should put the effort in with her, even if it's a waste of time. Her case is that they took her money then wrote her off, not that she's not a write off. | ||
MuffinDude
United States3837 Posts
On September 01 2009 14:33 JeeJee wrote: Show nested quote + On September 01 2009 14:19 MuffinDude wrote: To make it even worse, 70,000? Wtf? Thats like how much you pay in 4 years at a top tier college like stanford. Really? How the hell do you spend 70,000? What the hell did she do? Spend 20 dollars per meal?. ... what? edit: i just re-read your whole post again and i .. i just don't know if you're serious i hope not Come on, 70,000. Thats a lot for some random college in the middle of nowhere. And i read in places that she did absolutely nothing to get a job until graduation. She just expected that after graduation she could get a job. When my parents lost their jobs, it took them at least half a year to get another job. Finding jobs these days isn't easy. On September 01 2009 14:36 Kwark wrote: Her point was that the careers office is completely ignoring her and instead focussing on people with better grades who they can help more easily. This makes sense for the college because if you devote a day to getting interviews for top candidates you'll have more success than spending the same time getting interviews for mediocre ones. But if they both pay the same fees for the same service then the careers office should put the effort in with her, even if it's a waste of time. Her case is that they took her money then wrote her off, not that she's not a write off. It doesn't help the case the she has a well below average gpa and it is only like 4 months after her graduation. I'll be surprised if you land a job immediately after graduation. It might not also be the fact that their ignoring her, but the employers ignoring her request for interview. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42780 Posts
On September 01 2009 14:46 MuffinDude wrote: It might not also be the fact that their ignoring her, but the employers ignoring her request for interview. Which brings us back to what was originally said in the topic. She's alleging that they did not attempt to help her and instead focussed their efforts helping the better candidates who they could help more. They're saying they try and help everyone. The job of the court will be to decide which of the two it is, repeating that it could be one of them doesn't change the fact that it could be either and we don't know which. My point was just that her unemployability doesn't change anything in a debate about whether they tried to help her anyway. | ||
Purind
Canada3562 Posts
On September 01 2009 03:20 Slithe wrote: In case anyone still cares, I found a short article relating to this story. It basically talks about Monroe College and it's questionable practices. http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/money-trail/2009/08/12/sue-school?page=0,0 I'm inclined to say that this is a case of exploitation, not just another retard looking to win a ridiculous lawsuit. Thanks for the article, I found it interesting. | ||
Slithe
United States985 Posts
On September 01 2009 14:46 MuffinDude wrote: Show nested quote + On September 01 2009 14:33 JeeJee wrote: On September 01 2009 14:19 MuffinDude wrote: To make it even worse, 70,000? Wtf? Thats like how much you pay in 4 years at a top tier college like stanford. Really? How the hell do you spend 70,000? What the hell did she do? Spend 20 dollars per meal?. ... what? edit: i just re-read your whole post again and i .. i just don't know if you're serious i hope not Come on, 70,000. Thats a lot for some random college in the middle of nowhere. And i read in places that she did absolutely nothing to get a job until graduation. She just expected that after graduation she could get a job. When my parents lost their jobs, it took them at least half a year to get another job. Finding jobs these days isn't easy. Show nested quote + On September 01 2009 14:36 Kwark wrote: Her point was that the careers office is completely ignoring her and instead focussing on people with better grades who they can help more easily. This makes sense for the college because if you devote a day to getting interviews for top candidates you'll have more success than spending the same time getting interviews for mediocre ones. But if they both pay the same fees for the same service then the careers office should put the effort in with her, even if it's a waste of time. Her case is that they took her money then wrote her off, not that she's not a write off. It doesn't help the case the she has a well below average gpa and it is only like 4 months after her graduation. I'll be surprised if you land a job immediately after graduation. It might not also be the fact that their ignoring her, but the employers ignoring her request for interview. I think you're being a little too ignorant of the actual situation here. We aren't talking about a normal school that she's suing here. You should first read the link that I posted on the previous page. You also have probably led a largely convenient life, and have suffered little hardships compared to the people who typically get exploited by these supposed institutes of higher education. Imagine this kind of scenario: A person who's grown up in less than ideal conditions, is finally looking to make something of himself and improve his life by getting a better education. His local neighborhood college is advertising just that kind of an opportunity, and also promises to help him find a job afterward. So the man decides to make that 4 year commitment, taking on some student loans in the process. Little did he know what kind of a shitty education he was getting, and how little he was actually learning in the way of applicable job skills. So where does the man stand now? Eight semesters of college at $5000/semester, 4 years of time wasted, and the bill is only growing as the student loans keep going unpaid. When you look at it like that, $70k doesn't look so unreasonable anymore. The college is using deceitful tricks to lure naive individuals into their institution and rob them of their cash. One could say that it's the woman's fault for being tricked, but I would hope that we as a society have advanced enough to not endorse such exploitation. | ||
MuffinDude
United States3837 Posts
On September 01 2009 15:11 Slithe wrote: Show nested quote + On September 01 2009 14:46 MuffinDude wrote: On September 01 2009 14:33 JeeJee wrote: On September 01 2009 14:19 MuffinDude wrote: To make it even worse, 70,000? Wtf? Thats like how much you pay in 4 years at a top tier college like stanford. Really? How the hell do you spend 70,000? What the hell did she do? Spend 20 dollars per meal?. ... what? edit: i just re-read your whole post again and i .. i just don't know if you're serious i hope not Come on, 70,000. Thats a lot for some random college in the middle of nowhere. And i read in places that she did absolutely nothing to get a job until graduation. She just expected that after graduation she could get a job. When my parents lost their jobs, it took them at least half a year to get another job. Finding jobs these days isn't easy. On September 01 2009 14:36 Kwark wrote: Her point was that the careers office is completely ignoring her and instead focussing on people with better grades who they can help more easily. This makes sense for the college because if you devote a day to getting interviews for top candidates you'll have more success than spending the same time getting interviews for mediocre ones. But if they both pay the same fees for the same service then the careers office should put the effort in with her, even if it's a waste of time. Her case is that they took her money then wrote her off, not that she's not a write off. It doesn't help the case the she has a well below average gpa and it is only like 4 months after her graduation. I'll be surprised if you land a job immediately after graduation. It might not also be the fact that their ignoring her, but the employers ignoring her request for interview. I think you're being a little too ignorant of the actual situation here. We aren't talking about a normal school that she's suing here. You should first read the link that I posted on the previous page. You also have probably led a largely convenient life, and have suffered little hardships compared to the people who typically get exploited by these supposed institutes of higher education. Imagine this kind of scenario: A person who's grown up in less than ideal conditions, is finally looking to make something of himself and improve his life by getting a better education. His local neighborhood college is advertising just that kind of an opportunity, and also promises to help him find a job afterward. So the man decides to make that 4 year commitment, taking on some student loans in the process. Little did he know what kind of a shitty education he was getting, and how little he was actually learning in the way of applicable job skills. So where does the man stand now? Eight semesters of college at $5000/semester, 4 years of time wasted, and the bill is only growing as the student loans keep going unpaid. When you look at it like that, $70k doesn't look so unreasonable anymore. The college is using deceitful tricks to lure naive individuals into their institution and rob them of their cash. One could say that it's the woman's fault for being tricked, but I would hope that we as a society have advanced enough to not endorse such exploitation. Yes the college being corrupt could be true, but from the general gist of it, this person is just some lazy idiot who doesn't want to try to get a job. I did some reading into it and she apparently didn't do much in classes and was actually quite lazy. She could at least hold part time job to relieve the burden but apparently she didn't get any part time jobs. My parents came from less than ideal condition, as they grew up in china during 1950s to 1960s. During the time, my parents couldn't go to college because the colleges were closed to applicants, and when the college entrance exams opened up again, they worked their butt off, got into college, and managed to go to America where they are living a fairly good life. I just think that its insulting that you are grouping this kind of person with many of other people like my parents who worked their butt off to get somewhere in their life. American's living standard is actually far better than many other countries and as a result most Americans don't know what a real hardships are like (now the difference isn't that big, but when you compare now America to then China, it is a big difference). The only thing that is being debated about this case is whether she will win. The only way that she will win this case is if the court sees that the college did nothing to help he get a job. | ||
Slithe
United States985 Posts
On September 01 2009 15:31 MuffinDude wrote: Show nested quote + On September 01 2009 15:11 Slithe wrote: On September 01 2009 14:46 MuffinDude wrote: On September 01 2009 14:33 JeeJee wrote: On September 01 2009 14:19 MuffinDude wrote: To make it even worse, 70,000? Wtf? Thats like how much you pay in 4 years at a top tier college like stanford. Really? How the hell do you spend 70,000? What the hell did she do? Spend 20 dollars per meal?. ... what? edit: i just re-read your whole post again and i .. i just don't know if you're serious i hope not Come on, 70,000. Thats a lot for some random college in the middle of nowhere. And i read in places that she did absolutely nothing to get a job until graduation. She just expected that after graduation she could get a job. When my parents lost their jobs, it took them at least half a year to get another job. Finding jobs these days isn't easy. On September 01 2009 14:36 Kwark wrote: Her point was that the careers office is completely ignoring her and instead focussing on people with better grades who they can help more easily. This makes sense for the college because if you devote a day to getting interviews for top candidates you'll have more success than spending the same time getting interviews for mediocre ones. But if they both pay the same fees for the same service then the careers office should put the effort in with her, even if it's a waste of time. Her case is that they took her money then wrote her off, not that she's not a write off. It doesn't help the case the she has a well below average gpa and it is only like 4 months after her graduation. I'll be surprised if you land a job immediately after graduation. It might not also be the fact that their ignoring her, but the employers ignoring her request for interview. I think you're being a little too ignorant of the actual situation here. We aren't talking about a normal school that she's suing here. You should first read the link that I posted on the previous page. You also have probably led a largely convenient life, and have suffered little hardships compared to the people who typically get exploited by these supposed institutes of higher education. Imagine this kind of scenario: A person who's grown up in less than ideal conditions, is finally looking to make something of himself and improve his life by getting a better education. His local neighborhood college is advertising just that kind of an opportunity, and also promises to help him find a job afterward. So the man decides to make that 4 year commitment, taking on some student loans in the process. Little did he know what kind of a shitty education he was getting, and how little he was actually learning in the way of applicable job skills. So where does the man stand now? Eight semesters of college at $5000/semester, 4 years of time wasted, and the bill is only growing as the student loans keep going unpaid. When you look at it like that, $70k doesn't look so unreasonable anymore. The college is using deceitful tricks to lure naive individuals into their institution and rob them of their cash. One could say that it's the woman's fault for being tricked, but I would hope that we as a society have advanced enough to not endorse such exploitation. Yes the college being corrupt could be true, but from the general gist of it, this person is just some lazy idiot who doesn't want to try to get a job. I did some reading into it and she apparently didn't do much in classes and was actually quite lazy. She could at least hold part time job to relieve the burden but apparently she didn't get any part time jobs. My parents came from less than ideal condition, as they grew up in china during 1950s to 1960s. During the time, my parents couldn't go to college because the colleges were closed to applicants, and when the college entrance exams opened up again, they worked their butt off, got into college, and managed to go to America where they are living a fairly good life. I just think that its insulting that you are grouping this kind of person with many of other people like my parents who worked their butt off to get somewhere in their life. American's living standard is actually far better than many other countries and as a result most Americans don't know what a real hardships are like (now the difference isn't that big, but when you compare now America to then China, it is a big difference). The only thing that is being debated about this case is whether she will win. The only way that she will win this case is if the court sees that the college did nothing to help he get a job. Is it possible for you to link the reading you did regarding her time in school? From the bit of research I did, nearly all the news stories are hardly longer than 2 paragraphs and lacked much in the way of real details. If this were a story about someone suing a reputable school, I'd call bullshit on it. However, this Monroe College is looking quite shady to me. | ||
MuffinDude
United States3837 Posts
On September 01 2009 15:46 Slithe wrote: Show nested quote + On September 01 2009 15:31 MuffinDude wrote: On September 01 2009 15:11 Slithe wrote: On September 01 2009 14:46 MuffinDude wrote: On September 01 2009 14:33 JeeJee wrote: On September 01 2009 14:19 MuffinDude wrote: To make it even worse, 70,000? Wtf? Thats like how much you pay in 4 years at a top tier college like stanford. Really? How the hell do you spend 70,000? What the hell did she do? Spend 20 dollars per meal?. ... what? edit: i just re-read your whole post again and i .. i just don't know if you're serious i hope not Come on, 70,000. Thats a lot for some random college in the middle of nowhere. And i read in places that she did absolutely nothing to get a job until graduation. She just expected that after graduation she could get a job. When my parents lost their jobs, it took them at least half a year to get another job. Finding jobs these days isn't easy. On September 01 2009 14:36 Kwark wrote: Her point was that the careers office is completely ignoring her and instead focussing on people with better grades who they can help more easily. This makes sense for the college because if you devote a day to getting interviews for top candidates you'll have more success than spending the same time getting interviews for mediocre ones. But if they both pay the same fees for the same service then the careers office should put the effort in with her, even if it's a waste of time. Her case is that they took her money then wrote her off, not that she's not a write off. It doesn't help the case the she has a well below average gpa and it is only like 4 months after her graduation. I'll be surprised if you land a job immediately after graduation. It might not also be the fact that their ignoring her, but the employers ignoring her request for interview. I think you're being a little too ignorant of the actual situation here. We aren't talking about a normal school that she's suing here. You should first read the link that I posted on the previous page. You also have probably led a largely convenient life, and have suffered little hardships compared to the people who typically get exploited by these supposed institutes of higher education. Imagine this kind of scenario: A person who's grown up in less than ideal conditions, is finally looking to make something of himself and improve his life by getting a better education. His local neighborhood college is advertising just that kind of an opportunity, and also promises to help him find a job afterward. So the man decides to make that 4 year commitment, taking on some student loans in the process. Little did he know what kind of a shitty education he was getting, and how little he was actually learning in the way of applicable job skills. So where does the man stand now? Eight semesters of college at $5000/semester, 4 years of time wasted, and the bill is only growing as the student loans keep going unpaid. When you look at it like that, $70k doesn't look so unreasonable anymore. The college is using deceitful tricks to lure naive individuals into their institution and rob them of their cash. One could say that it's the woman's fault for being tricked, but I would hope that we as a society have advanced enough to not endorse such exploitation. Yes the college being corrupt could be true, but from the general gist of it, this person is just some lazy idiot who doesn't want to try to get a job. I did some reading into it and she apparently didn't do much in classes and was actually quite lazy. She could at least hold part time job to relieve the burden but apparently she didn't get any part time jobs. My parents came from less than ideal condition, as they grew up in china during 1950s to 1960s. During the time, my parents couldn't go to college because the colleges were closed to applicants, and when the college entrance exams opened up again, they worked their butt off, got into college, and managed to go to America where they are living a fairly good life. I just think that its insulting that you are grouping this kind of person with many of other people like my parents who worked their butt off to get somewhere in their life. American's living standard is actually far better than many other countries and as a result most Americans don't know what a real hardships are like (now the difference isn't that big, but when you compare now America to then China, it is a big difference). The only thing that is being debated about this case is whether she will win. The only way that she will win this case is if the court sees that the college did nothing to help he get a job. Is it possible for you to link the reading you did regarding her time in school? From the bit of research I did, nearly all the news stories are hardly longer than 2 paragraphs and lacked much in the way of real details. If this were a story about someone suing a reputable school, I'd call bullshit on it. However, this Monroe College is looking quite shady to me. I will say this now, but I don't have good proof. Its mostly from comments from others. And based on a website, the average gpa of private school was around 3.5 while public 3.0. So her gpa was well below average. Heres the website where I got most of the comments from. http://www.nypost.com/seven/08022009/news/regionalnews/sheep_kinned_182607.htm Heres an example of a comment. I know this girl personally, and she is taking this too far. Although she graduated with a Bachelors degree, she didn't do the hard work that is required. She was on a team of 4-6 individuals at times, and she did nothing at all. She got the credit because it was a team effort. Everyone gets the same grade. Yes its not a good source, but the a lot of sources says the same thing. Its already suspicious to me that she just faded away after initially declaring that she was going to sue the college. And its also only 4 months after her graduation. If you have good gpa, and at least spent a year and not satisfied with the job that the colleges give, then hell i would sue them too. But her case is too weak especially in time the economic downturn. Edit: Check out this youtube video. It'll clarify conditions she must meet to win the lawsuit. | ||
Fontong
United States6454 Posts
On September 01 2009 04:02 Eniram wrote: Show nested quote + On September 01 2009 03:28 XsebT wrote: "Paying for going to college" is LOL HAHA LOL. ![]() With love from Denmark. It may cost money but our colleges are some of the best in the world so its worth it to me. I've never even heard of there being a college in Sudan, though I must assume that they exist. | ||
| ||
The PiG Daily
Best Games of SC
Reynor vs Zoun
Classic vs Clem
herO vs Solar
Serral vs TBD
PiGStarcraft499
[ Submit Event ] |
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games summit1g9594 tarik_tv8853 shahzam513 WinterStarcraft432 C9.Mang0431 Maynarde255 NeuroSwarm105 Trikslyr45 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH302 StarCraft: Brood War• practicex ![]() • Mapu10 • Kozan • Migwel ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • sooper7s • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP League of Legends |
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Creator vs Rogue
MaxPax vs Cure
PiGosaur Monday
Afreeca Starleague
Mini vs TBD
Soma vs sSak
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Clem vs goblin
ByuN vs SHIN
Online Event
The PondCast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Zoun vs Bunny
herO vs Solar
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] LiuLi Cup
BSL Team Wars
Team Hawk vs Team Dewalt
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
SC Evo League
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Classic vs Percival
Spirit vs NightMare
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Sparkling Tuna Cup
SC Evo League
BSL Team Wars
Team Bonyth vs Team Sziky
Afreeca Starleague
Queen vs HyuN
EffOrt vs Calm
Wardi Open
Replay Cast
|
|