EPTMovie - Hancock
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
InFiNitY[pG]
Germany3474 Posts
| ||
|
XCetron
5226 Posts
| ||
|
kidd
United States2848 Posts
| ||
|
Tropics
United Kingdom1132 Posts
| ||
Twisted
Netherlands13554 Posts
Definitely going to watch this. | ||
|
zizou21
United States3683 Posts
 | ||
|
H
New Zealand6138 Posts
| ||
|
Raithed
China7078 Posts
| ||
|
Spike
United States1392 Posts
looks like a good summer for movies. | ||
|
StripedBlueCrow
United States506 Posts
| ||
|
DhakhaR
United Kingdom721 Posts
ps. is it just me or does every trailer these days have at least one song from guitar hero? | ||
|
JudgeMathis
Cuba1286 Posts
| ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
| ||
|
JudgeMathis
Cuba1286 Posts
| ||
|
Archaic
United States4024 Posts
If anyone is wondering: I'm in Taiwan right now, so +12 hours =P. | ||
|
5HITCOMBO
Japan2239 Posts
Well I do. So fuck him, and fuck you, too. | ||
|
5HITCOMBO
Japan2239 Posts
| ||
|
Motiva
United States1774 Posts
This movie is worth watching simply because of it's style. As Deathtray said the back-story and everything does seem like the writers simply got lazy or something. Because it is great up until then. Worth watching -- I'd give it a 7/10 simply for the first hour. | ||
|
[GiTM]-Ace
United States4935 Posts
| ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
| ||
|
[X]Ken_D
United States4650 Posts
| ||
|
Cobalt
United States441 Posts
If that song is in this movie, I would be even more ecstatic <3 | ||
|
il0seonpurpose
Korea (South)5638 Posts
| ||
|
kpcrew
Korea (South)1071 Posts
| ||
|
B1nary
Canada1267 Posts
| ||
|
iLjh
United States160 Posts
On July 02 2008 12:48 il0seonpurpose wrote: Whats up with the name of the movie? you find out in the movie | ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
| ||
|
ulszz
Jamaica1787 Posts
| ||
|
Track
United States217 Posts
| ||
|
iori_LT
Lithuania675 Posts
gonna watch it 100% | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
|
FragKrag
United States11552 Posts
| ||
|
VIB
Brazil3567 Posts
Is this correct? edit: 35/100 rating "Though it begins with promise, Hancock suffers from a flimsy narrative and poor execution." from rottentomatoes.com k now there is something I am not gonna watch ^^ | ||
|
ash.cure
United States29 Posts
On July 02 2008 15:51 FragKrag wrote: If you watch the trailers, it gives hints about him becoming less powerful or some shit. Some woman said "Hancock is down and he looks hurt!" in one of the trailers. or he just gets his ass beat somehow... | ||
|
Motiva
United States1774 Posts
On July 02 2008 15:44 {88}iNcontroL wrote: some spoilers would be nice! I dont mind having it spoiler I just wanna know what the plot of this is.. who could he possibly battle when he is THAT powerful? ok. This is the movie: + Show Spoiler + Hancock is an alcoholic superhero because he doesn't remember anything from his past.... well atleast the last 80 years. He was hit on the head and doesn't remember anything. + Show Spoiler + This is because he isn't the only one... There is another like him and when they're around each other they nullify each other's powers. + Show Spoiler + So in short: He fights himself, because the public hates him for being a ridiculous drunken superhero and then he meets the other super hero, and becomes weak, and has to fight some thugs Totally worth watching though, because the humor and style of the character is very entertaining. Just don't expect any substance. | ||
|
Raithed
China7078 Posts
badddd guyssss do i look like i care? jackassss | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
|
decafchicken
United States20072 Posts
| ||
|
chobopeon
United States7342 Posts
but man the first half was worlds better than the first | ||
|
kpcrew
Korea (South)1071 Posts
On July 02 2008 15:51 FragKrag wrote: If you watch the trailers, it gives hints about him becoming less powerful or some shit. Some woman said "Hancock is down and he looks hurt!" in one of the trailers. i wouldnt trust a women with anything besides my laundry | ||
|
tube
United States1475 Posts
turned out to be a huge disappointment in that the ending was garbage and that the only thing it had going for it was humor | ||
|
Texas
Germany2388 Posts
| ||
|
jjun212
Canada2208 Posts
unless they are like MAJOR movie reviewers who look for the finest details like in no country for old men. the writer who made the story originally is really smart. the film wasn't that long and to fit hancock's actual past and everything into the film would have made it too long and people would have complained about that probably. the main point of the film was comedy and so the screen play writers and stuff wrote the hancock story in a comedy way. cutting out the dramatics and the heavy storyline to provide humour. i REALLY think that if hancock was made in a more serious way with a sequel or two or even a television series, you would all be amazed out how great the hancock story really is. + Show Spoiler + he forgot his past and lives like a bum doing heroic acts in the dumbest ways possible that harm the people of the city he is helping. he seems to have no purpose in his life and then he finds out about his past and why he is the way he is. he can't have love if he wants to finally serve a purpose in his life. its a choice he has to make... like cmon. you guys gotta admit, if it were longer and more detailed, it can be really awesome | ||
|
ThePhan2m
Norway2750 Posts
| ||
|
o3.power91
Bahrain5288 Posts
| ||
|
Kingsp4de20
United States716 Posts
| ||
|
CyuntiyuL
Canada1740 Posts
| ||
|
FragKrag
United States11552 Posts
| ||
XaI)CyRiC
United States4471 Posts
It seems like the movie got cut more than it should and left out some key parts that would've made the story more believable and not so abrupt. I felt like what I think people who have never read the Harry Potter books would feel from watching the movies, that so much seems to "come out of nowhere" because it isn't sufficiently explained or built up. I didn't feel any sort of connection to any of the characters or their relationships really because of how little they were built up as well. The movie didn't seem to flow that well, which again makes me feel like there was some bad editing done or something. The movie felt rushed in the second half, and very half-ass. In the end, it's an okay movie, but one that I wish I would've watched on DVD. | ||
Chosi
Germany1303 Posts
no story and when there is story its full of errors no plot and no message so this is like 5 or 6 jokes mixed in 2 hours of nothing. This should have been a 20 minute shortfilm and I would have loved it. You know and saw everything ... after you saw the trailer. | ||
|
Spike
United States1392 Posts
it could have been much better because there are some elements of Hancock that could translate into a good movie/story. | ||
|
ulszz
Jamaica1787 Posts
best part is the whale throw so u can actually just watch the movie on youtube. | ||
|
KicksAss
Canada30 Posts
| ||
|
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
| ||
|
Pressure
7326 Posts
On July 03 2008 18:48 tube wrote: i saw it with friends yesterday, they wanted to watch it over Wanted turned out to be a huge disappointment in that the ending was garbage and that the only thing it had going for it was humor seeing all the reviews for Hancock that im reading right now it's probably a little bit lower than Wanted wanted probably had better action scenes but the ending to it is probably just as bad lol | ||
|
Spike
United States1392 Posts
On July 04 2008 06:12 Pressure wrote: seeing all the reviews for Hancock that im reading right now it's probably a little bit lower than Wanted wanted probably had better action scenes but the ending to it is probably just as bad lol Wanted... ugh... the action scenes were fine but they had to fit some kind of dumb story to it. this movie is one those cases where a director should say fuck to the backstory and make it all about style. + Angelina looked 20 lbs too light, wtf. i was surprised she could hold up the prop guns. stop with stick figures in hollywood please. | ||
|
Funchucks
Canada2113 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Especially since this is clearly a prequel to the upcoming Thor movie. I think Hancock is going to end up "passing the torch" to a Mjolnir-dependent mortal, though. (I have a suspicion that he is going to become Mjolnir somehow) | ||
LosingID8
CA10828 Posts
and like people said, the first 2/3 to 3/4 of the movie was good, but after that it went downhill lol. still, it was entertaining to watch and i don't regret watching it. however, it's not the kind of movie that i would watch again on my own. | ||
|
EGoldman
United States110 Posts
| ||
|
Empyrean
17014 Posts
Hancock, for me, was disappointing. All through the movie I was wondering whether or not the movie was worth the money for me. I thought the plot was a decent idea, but was so contrivingly executed that it just fell apart for me. And in the paraphrased words of some newspaper I'm too lazy to remember/look up, not even Will Smith's charisma could save the mess that was Hancock. | ||
|
TranceStorm
1616 Posts
| ||
|
Sze-Yuen
Canada23 Posts
| ||
|
XaI)CyRiC
United States4471 Posts
On July 06 2008 07:51 EGoldman wrote: People are right about their complaints, but at least the character wasn't cliche, the conflict in the first 1/2 of the movie was very believable and sympathetic, and the dialogue was sharp. Wall-E on the other hand... You've made your point on the Wall-E matter, no need to bring it up again in this thread. Now you're just getting petty and troll-like. Grow up. | ||
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
After this i went and saw Wanted which was soooo much better. | ||
|
EGoldman
United States110 Posts
On July 07 2008 15:22 XaI)CyRiC wrote: You've made your point on the Wall-E matter, no need to bring it up again in this thread. Now you're just getting petty and troll-like. Grow up. Grow up? You're the one getting troll like trying to come at me over a 5 word line. That's why I left it at that with zero specifics. Relax. And learn what maturity means before you try insulting other people about it. | ||
|
morfyy
Romania593 Posts
| ||
|
Conquest101
United States1395 Posts
On July 05 2008 17:32 Funchucks wrote: I liked it a lot. + Show Spoiler + Especially since this is clearly a prequel to the upcoming Thor movie. I think Hancock is going to end up "passing the torch" to a Mjolnir-dependent mortal, though. (I have a suspicion that he is going to become Mjolnir somehow) I dunno if I'm being Romanian with this (probably), but is there any basis for this spoiler? It'd be quite the stretch but would definitely be amusing. But Hancock has no connection with Marvel right? | ||
|
Funchucks
Canada2113 Posts
On July 08 2008 04:42 Conquest101 wrote: I dunno if I'm being Romanian with this (probably), but is there any basis for this spoiler? It'd be quite the stretch but would definitely be amusing. But Hancock has no connection with Marvel right? + Show Spoiler + I think they deliberately hid the connection to ease people into it, because Thor is going to be a hard sell, despite being an indispensible original member of the Avengers. But there was a tell in the sneak clip (just after the credits), when a guy compares Hancock in his new costume to Wolverine (of the X-Men). | ||
|
XaI)CyRiC
United States4471 Posts
On July 08 2008 04:42 Conquest101 wrote: I dunno if I'm being Romanian with this (probably), but is there any basis for this spoiler? It'd be quite the stretch but would definitely be amusing. But Hancock has no connection with Marvel right? + Show Spoiler + I think it's a bit of a stretch myself. As far as I know there is connection between Hancock and Marvel. I really don't think that this movie is "clearly a prequel" to any movie, and, at best, has only a very tenuous connection to Thor. A nice theory, but I think based more on hope than actual evidence. | ||
|
aeronexus
United States392 Posts
On July 07 2008 22:02 Kennigit wrote: God i was so disappointed with this movie. The premise is amazing - a hobo who is a super hero LOL! But the writing, the direction and the execution reminded me of a glorified teen Disney movie i'd watch sunday afternoon after waking to an intense hangover. After this i went and saw Wanted which was soooo much better. lol that's pretty much the opposite of what I thought about the movies; Wanted seemed brainless and poorly done while the only thing that bothered me about Hancock was over-use of an unsteady camera. | ||
|
Spenguin
Australia3316 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Before that fight between both of them, the one with the 3 cyclones on the street, did anyone notice a robot or something taller and not human shaped running between the cars, the camera was on it for like 2 seconds a long with other extras as they ran away. | ||
|
Centric
United States1989 Posts
| ||
|
SlickR12345
Macedonia408 Posts
| ||
|
Play
Australia608 Posts
kind of disappointing really :/ | ||
|
evanthebouncy!
United States12796 Posts
The whole gods shits irks me so. | ||
|
Spenguin
Australia3316 Posts
. | ||
|
BottleAbuser
Korea (South)1888 Posts
| ||
| ||
