|
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. |
But You are clearly wrong. There is contiunuity of Soviet-Russian state and there is continuity of atrocities during all the time of its existance. WWII, Hungary (1956), Czechoslovakia (1968), Afghanistan (1979-89), Chechenya (1994-1996) and (1999-2000), Georgia (2008), Syria(2015-present), Ukraine (2014-present). They never apologized for them, they never admited they did something wrong. On the contarary people who commited those atrocities are cheerished as heros. As an example to follow. Many of higher ranking officers killed by Ukrainans were veterans of either Chechenya, Syria, Georgia or all of them. Distiguished heroes of Russia. Butchers with blood on their hands.
And there is also issue of police state and rule of terror, gulags, KGB (FSB), killings of poltical oponents and squashing of oposition. Subjugating neighbouring countries by force or threat of use force.
|
On April 12 2022 15:51 Broetchenholer wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2022 08:11 Manit0u wrote:On April 12 2022 07:25 Ghanburighan wrote: I'm sorry, but assuming that these atrocities are just soldiers acting independently is false. There are way too many reports like the following which suggest that orders came from superiors to execute prisoners.
I believe the orders came from above too. It's too wide-spread and methodical for it to be like one rogue battalion doing it or something like that. Another thing to keep in mind is that Russia has a history of class and ethnic purging (Stalin's government killed way more people than Nazis). This is exactly the comment I am arguing against. Somehow Russia decades after Stalins death has a history of purging. Russia is exactly as much the Stalin regime as Germany is the third Reich or GB is the British empire and the US are still systemically racist, but they don't allow slavery anymore. Putins war crimes stand on their own feet, they do not need Stalin or the Russian empire to work. I think it is undeniable that Putins army uses terror against civilians as a tool and I hope they will pay for it. They are not nazis though. They do not plan to murder 43 million Ukrainians, they are arguing that Ukraine never existed because those people are actually really Russians. Their propaganda is desperately trying to keep up with the blatant lies of their leadership while reality might bring a defeat and not a 5 day victory. All of that does not justify or apologize for the crimes the invading army has committed but at the same time making Putin to Stalin 2.0 is not helpful either.
This is prime westsplaining. You take a random misunderstood part of the argument (RU22=Stalin), strawman that, and then provide your own definitive explanation of what's happening "Russia just wants to destroy Ukraine". The only problem being, it's divorced from historical and current reality. You can trace the behaviour of modern Russia to the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars. Their people, their leaders, and especially their diplomatic corps learned a modus operandi and follow it to this day. Of course, there are modifications, improvements, and more, but Russia 2022 didn't fall out fo the sky, it evolved into its current state. And when a country has Stalin in its history, and instead of repenting like DE or JP, it has spent the last two decades glorifying him, you can see why mentioning Stalin is relevant. What Stalin did is not abhorrent to Russians, it's to be valued and replicated.
Putin sees, and his successor will see, Russia as an empire. They appear to believe that they have been given a holy mission to make as much of the world Russian as possible. Whether that stops before they kill millions of Ukrainians or not, we don't know. But there is nothing in their rhetoric that says that they won't if they have to. And, their plan requires people from other nations to die as well. Moldovans, Georgians, perhaps the Finnish. Germany is almost certainly high on their list because of the part it played in WWII and the Cold War. They're salivating at the chance to declare Germany a nazi state and march on Berlin like in their Great Patriotic War.
Fortunately, by showing the atrocities of Russia, and the genocidal intent behind them, we can hopefully rally to stop them, again. And, this time, we hopefully don't give them a "get out of jail free card" because they have oil and gas, and instead force them to play by the same rules as all other countries. You either behave or you get isolated.
|
So if Finns go to vote on joining NATO then by accounts it will be the new member.
Finns are making a somber assessment of their eastern neighbor: 84% think that Russia poses a significant military threat after it attacked Ukraine on Feb. 24 and began waging a full-scale war.
That’s up 25 percentage points from a year earlier, according to a survey measuring attitudes in the second and third weeks of Russia’s invasion, published on Tuesday by Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVA. In 2005, fewer than one in three considered Russia a significant military threat.
The changed attitudes help explain why Finns almost overnight began backing entry to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, with the government seen leaning toward a membership application to the defense alliance within weeks.
The people in the Nordic country, which has a 1,300-kilometer (800-mile) border with Russia and a history of wars going back hundreds of years, think Russia is an expansionary dictatorship, according to the poll. They’re nearly unanimous in saying their neighbor is “unstable and unpredictable,” with just 2% saying they did not agree with that characterization of Russia in the poll.
Yet almost 60% of Finns said Russians are “pleasant people” and more than 70% said Russia has a rich culture. The poll conducted by Taloustutkimus Oy had 2,074 responses in the period March 4-15.
Source
|
On April 12 2022 17:29 Ghanburighan wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2022 15:51 Broetchenholer wrote:On April 12 2022 08:11 Manit0u wrote:On April 12 2022 07:25 Ghanburighan wrote: I'm sorry, but assuming that these atrocities are just soldiers acting independently is false. There are way too many reports like the following which suggest that orders came from superiors to execute prisoners.
I believe the orders came from above too. It's too wide-spread and methodical for it to be like one rogue battalion doing it or something like that. Another thing to keep in mind is that Russia has a history of class and ethnic purging (Stalin's government killed way more people than Nazis). This is exactly the comment I am arguing against. Somehow Russia decades after Stalins death has a history of purging. Russia is exactly as much the Stalin regime as Germany is the third Reich or GB is the British empire and the US are still systemically racist, but they don't allow slavery anymore. Putins war crimes stand on their own feet, they do not need Stalin or the Russian empire to work. I think it is undeniable that Putins army uses terror against civilians as a tool and I hope they will pay for it. They are not nazis though. They do not plan to murder 43 million Ukrainians, they are arguing that Ukraine never existed because those people are actually really Russians. Their propaganda is desperately trying to keep up with the blatant lies of their leadership while reality might bring a defeat and not a 5 day victory. All of that does not justify or apologize for the crimes the invading army has committed but at the same time making Putin to Stalin 2.0 is not helpful either. This is prime westsplaining. You take a random misunderstood part of the argument (RU22=Stalin), strawman that, and then provide your own definitive explanation of what's happening "Russia just wants to destroy Ukraine". The only problem being, it's divorced from historical and current reality. You can trace the behaviour of modern Russia to the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars. Their people, their leaders, and especially their diplomatic corps learned a modus operandi and follow it to this day. Of course, there are modifications, improvements, and more, but Russia 2022 didn't fall out fo the sky, it evolved into its current state. And when a country has Stalin in its history, and instead of repenting like DE or JP, it has spent the last two decades glorifying him, you can see why mentioning Stalin is relevant. What Stalin did is not abhorrent to Russians, it's to be valued and replicated. Putin sees, and his successor will see, Russia as an empire. They appear to believe that they have been given a holy mission to make as much of the world Russian as possible. Whether that stops before they kill millions of Ukrainians or not, we don't know. But there is nothing in their rhetoric that says that they won't if they have to. And, their plan requires people from other nations to die as well. Moldovans, Georgians, perhaps the Finnish. Germany is almost certainly high on their list because of the part it played in WWII and the Cold War. They're salivating at the chance to declare Germany a nazi state and march on Berlin like in their Great Patriotic War. Fortunately, by showing the atrocities of Russia, and the genocidal intent behind them, we can hopefully rally to stop them, again. And, this time, we hopefully don't give them a "get out of jail free card" because they have oil and gas, and instead force them to play by the same rules as all other countries. You either behave or you get isolated.
I disagree. And how is that "westsplaining", i am from eastern germany old enough to remember the GDR, i am as much part of the west as an average young person from Estonia is. You are talking about how Russia is so much defined by the opposition to the west and imperialism against the west and then manage to define yourself as being offended by an opinion held by a random person on the internet that happens to live in Germany.
If Russia is the only country where you believe that their current behaviour is entirely in line with every bad thing they did in the last 200 years, while everyone else evolved from their imperialistic times and is now freed from their history, maybe you should think about why this one nation is so differently perceived by you. Russia is not a nazi state and had they won their war in 5 days, they would not have started to murder civilians. Because their goal was not to murder all Ukrainians, their goal was to puppet the country and generate as much wealth as possible for them to steal while looking like they care for this Russian Empire you seem to be fixated about. They are clearly willing to use terror as a tool, as such, the russian army right now and for the last 2 decades are definately war criminals and monsters. That does not mean them commiting war crimes is inevitable because they are russian, or that the next step can only be genocide of Ukraine or an invasion of germany.
|
On April 12 2022 22:47 Broetchenholer wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2022 17:29 Ghanburighan wrote:On April 12 2022 15:51 Broetchenholer wrote:On April 12 2022 08:11 Manit0u wrote:On April 12 2022 07:25 Ghanburighan wrote: I'm sorry, but assuming that these atrocities are just soldiers acting independently is false. There are way too many reports like the following which suggest that orders came from superiors to execute prisoners.
I believe the orders came from above too. It's too wide-spread and methodical for it to be like one rogue battalion doing it or something like that. Another thing to keep in mind is that Russia has a history of class and ethnic purging (Stalin's government killed way more people than Nazis). This is exactly the comment I am arguing against. Somehow Russia decades after Stalins death has a history of purging. Russia is exactly as much the Stalin regime as Germany is the third Reich or GB is the British empire and the US are still systemically racist, but they don't allow slavery anymore. Putins war crimes stand on their own feet, they do not need Stalin or the Russian empire to work. I think it is undeniable that Putins army uses terror against civilians as a tool and I hope they will pay for it. They are not nazis though. They do not plan to murder 43 million Ukrainians, they are arguing that Ukraine never existed because those people are actually really Russians. Their propaganda is desperately trying to keep up with the blatant lies of their leadership while reality might bring a defeat and not a 5 day victory. All of that does not justify or apologize for the crimes the invading army has committed but at the same time making Putin to Stalin 2.0 is not helpful either. This is prime westsplaining. You take a random misunderstood part of the argument (RU22=Stalin), strawman that, and then provide your own definitive explanation of what's happening "Russia just wants to destroy Ukraine". The only problem being, it's divorced from historical and current reality. You can trace the behaviour of modern Russia to the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars. Their people, their leaders, and especially their diplomatic corps learned a modus operandi and follow it to this day. Of course, there are modifications, improvements, and more, but Russia 2022 didn't fall out fo the sky, it evolved into its current state. And when a country has Stalin in its history, and instead of repenting like DE or JP, it has spent the last two decades glorifying him, you can see why mentioning Stalin is relevant. What Stalin did is not abhorrent to Russians, it's to be valued and replicated. Putin sees, and his successor will see, Russia as an empire. They appear to believe that they have been given a holy mission to make as much of the world Russian as possible. Whether that stops before they kill millions of Ukrainians or not, we don't know. But there is nothing in their rhetoric that says that they won't if they have to. And, their plan requires people from other nations to die as well. Moldovans, Georgians, perhaps the Finnish. Germany is almost certainly high on their list because of the part it played in WWII and the Cold War. They're salivating at the chance to declare Germany a nazi state and march on Berlin like in their Great Patriotic War. Fortunately, by showing the atrocities of Russia, and the genocidal intent behind them, we can hopefully rally to stop them, again. And, this time, we hopefully don't give them a "get out of jail free card" because they have oil and gas, and instead force them to play by the same rules as all other countries. You either behave or you get isolated. I disagree. And how is that "westsplaining", i am from eastern germany old enough to remember the GDR, i am as much part of the west as an average young person from Estonia is. You are talking about how Russia is so much defined by the opposition to the west and imperialism against the west and then manage to define yourself as being offended by an opinion held by a random person on the internet that happens to live in Germany. If Russia is the only country where you believe that their current behaviour is entirely in line with every bad thing they did in the last 200 years, while everyone else evolved from their imperialistic times and is now freed from their history, maybe you should think about why this one nation is so differently perceived by you. Russia is not a nazi state and had they won their war in 5 days, they would not have started to murder civilians. Because their goal was not to murder all Ukrainians, their goal was to puppet the country and generate as much wealth as possible for them to steal while looking like they care for this Russian Empire you seem to be fixated about. They are clearly willing to use terror as a tool, as such, the russian army right now and for the last 2 decades are definately war criminals and monsters. That does not mean them commiting war crimes is inevitable because they are russian, or that the next step can only be genocide of Ukraine or an invasion of germany.
I'm not so sure this is an accurate sentiment. They detained, tortured, and disappeared plenty of Crimean civilians post-annexation. Unless you are not counting targeted eradication of anyone expressing anti-Russian sentiment as murdering civilians. I guess it wouldn't be uniformed soldiers doing it, though.
|
You also have to consider the fact that if you for example make a YouTube video where you're saying anything not in line with Russian government statements or anything against or criticizing the "special operation" you're facing 15 years in prison. That is a pretty clear indication of a fascist regime.
And before people start calling me out for pointing out that Russia is in fact a fascist state, let's just check the quick checklist of 14 defining characteristics of fascism:
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - check 2. Disregard for Human Rights - check 3. Identification of Enemies as a Unifying Cause - check 4. Supremacy of the Military - maybe? 5. Widespread Sexism - check 6. Controlled Mass Media - check 7. Obsession with National Security - check 8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - maybe? 9. Corporate Power is Protected - check (oligarchs in this case) 10. Labor Power is Suppressed - check 11. Disrespect for Intellectuals and the Arts - maybe? 12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - check 13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - check 14. Fraudulent Elections - check
That's a lot of ticked boxes right there. Pretty clear indicators of a totalitarian fascist state in my opinion.
|
Russia has disappeared and massacred civilians in Chechnya well into 2000 entirely unrelated to military objectives. I'm not informed on post-2000, but it would surprise me if they just stopped there. Political analysis concludes that this was due to Russian policy labeling all Chechens as combatants and all combatants as terrorists. It was also considered a cleansing by Russia.
Russia in Ukraine is the exact same situation. The claim that they'd halt their crimes against civilians after their war efforts isn't based in historical and recent observation.
|
On April 12 2022 23:47 TheTenthDoc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2022 22:47 Broetchenholer wrote:On April 12 2022 17:29 Ghanburighan wrote:On April 12 2022 15:51 Broetchenholer wrote:On April 12 2022 08:11 Manit0u wrote:On April 12 2022 07:25 Ghanburighan wrote: I'm sorry, but assuming that these atrocities are just soldiers acting independently is false. There are way too many reports like the following which suggest that orders came from superiors to execute prisoners.
I believe the orders came from above too. It's too wide-spread and methodical for it to be like one rogue battalion doing it or something like that. Another thing to keep in mind is that Russia has a history of class and ethnic purging (Stalin's government killed way more people than Nazis). This is exactly the comment I am arguing against. Somehow Russia decades after Stalins death has a history of purging. Russia is exactly as much the Stalin regime as Germany is the third Reich or GB is the British empire and the US are still systemically racist, but they don't allow slavery anymore. Putins war crimes stand on their own feet, they do not need Stalin or the Russian empire to work. I think it is undeniable that Putins army uses terror against civilians as a tool and I hope they will pay for it. They are not nazis though. They do not plan to murder 43 million Ukrainians, they are arguing that Ukraine never existed because those people are actually really Russians. Their propaganda is desperately trying to keep up with the blatant lies of their leadership while reality might bring a defeat and not a 5 day victory. All of that does not justify or apologize for the crimes the invading army has committed but at the same time making Putin to Stalin 2.0 is not helpful either. This is prime westsplaining. You take a random misunderstood part of the argument (RU22=Stalin), strawman that, and then provide your own definitive explanation of what's happening "Russia just wants to destroy Ukraine". The only problem being, it's divorced from historical and current reality. You can trace the behaviour of modern Russia to the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars. Their people, their leaders, and especially their diplomatic corps learned a modus operandi and follow it to this day. Of course, there are modifications, improvements, and more, but Russia 2022 didn't fall out fo the sky, it evolved into its current state. And when a country has Stalin in its history, and instead of repenting like DE or JP, it has spent the last two decades glorifying him, you can see why mentioning Stalin is relevant. What Stalin did is not abhorrent to Russians, it's to be valued and replicated. Putin sees, and his successor will see, Russia as an empire. They appear to believe that they have been given a holy mission to make as much of the world Russian as possible. Whether that stops before they kill millions of Ukrainians or not, we don't know. But there is nothing in their rhetoric that says that they won't if they have to. And, their plan requires people from other nations to die as well. Moldovans, Georgians, perhaps the Finnish. Germany is almost certainly high on their list because of the part it played in WWII and the Cold War. They're salivating at the chance to declare Germany a nazi state and march on Berlin like in their Great Patriotic War. Fortunately, by showing the atrocities of Russia, and the genocidal intent behind them, we can hopefully rally to stop them, again. And, this time, we hopefully don't give them a "get out of jail free card" because they have oil and gas, and instead force them to play by the same rules as all other countries. You either behave or you get isolated. I disagree. And how is that "westsplaining", i am from eastern germany old enough to remember the GDR, i am as much part of the west as an average young person from Estonia is. You are talking about how Russia is so much defined by the opposition to the west and imperialism against the west and then manage to define yourself as being offended by an opinion held by a random person on the internet that happens to live in Germany. If Russia is the only country where you believe that their current behaviour is entirely in line with every bad thing they did in the last 200 years, while everyone else evolved from their imperialistic times and is now freed from their history, maybe you should think about why this one nation is so differently perceived by you. Russia is not a nazi state and had they won their war in 5 days, they would not have started to murder civilians. Because their goal was not to murder all Ukrainians, their goal was to puppet the country and generate as much wealth as possible for them to steal while looking like they care for this Russian Empire you seem to be fixated about. They are clearly willing to use terror as a tool, as such, the russian army right now and for the last 2 decades are definately war criminals and monsters. That does not mean them commiting war crimes is inevitable because they are russian, or that the next step can only be genocide of Ukraine or an invasion of germany. I'm not so sure this is an accurate sentiment. They detained, tortured, and disappeared plenty of Crimean civilians post-annexation. Unless you are not counting targeted eradication of anyone expressing anti-Russian sentiment as murdering civilians. I guess it wouldn't be uniformed soldiers doing it, though. There is also the difference that Crimea has the largest Russian population in Ukraine at ~70%, so if you want to kill non-Russians Crimea is not the region to commit mass murder in.
|
|
Russian Federation20 Posts
On April 13 2022 00:24 Manit0u wrote: You also have to consider the fact that if you for example make a YouTube video where you're saying anything not in line with Russian government statements or anything against or criticizing the "special operation" you're facing 15 years in prison. That is a pretty clear indication of a fascist regime.
And before people start calling me out for pointing out that Russia is in fact a fascist state, let's just check the quick checklist of 14 defining characteristics of fascism:
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - check 2. Disregard for Human Rights - check 3. Identification of Enemies as a Unifying Cause - check 4. Supremacy of the Military - maybe? 5. Widespread Sexism - check 6. Controlled Mass Media - check 7. Obsession with National Security - check 8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - maybe? 9. Corporate Power is Protected - check (oligarchs in this case) 10. Labor Power is Suppressed - check 11. Disrespect for Intellectuals and the Arts - maybe? 12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - check 13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - check 14. Fraudulent Elections - check
That's a lot of ticked boxes right there. Pretty clear indicators of a totalitarian fascist state in my opinion.
I'm note 100% sure that right now what we see here in Russia is a pure fascism, but may be some form of it. 1,3 - is not 100% true; there is still a large "pro-western" group of people. The propaganda works well on poorer people though 4 - I'd say supremacy of secret police (FSB). A military carrier was never considered prestigious (except for some Caucasian regions, where they have very high unemployment). 8 - 100% true; Russian Orthodoxal Church is just a department of FSB now 9 - we almost do not have true oligarchs; most of them are simply placeholders working for FSB 11 - unsure; recent years IT professions were growing in popularity - with a spike of interest for technical education etc 13-14 - 100% true
|
Russian Federation20 Posts
On April 13 2022 00:36 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2022 23:47 TheTenthDoc wrote:On April 12 2022 22:47 Broetchenholer wrote:On April 12 2022 17:29 Ghanburighan wrote:On April 12 2022 15:51 Broetchenholer wrote:On April 12 2022 08:11 Manit0u wrote:On April 12 2022 07:25 Ghanburighan wrote: I'm sorry, but assuming that these atrocities are just soldiers acting independently is false. There are way too many reports like the following which suggest that orders came from superiors to execute prisoners.
I believe the orders came from above too. It's too wide-spread and methodical for it to be like one rogue battalion doing it or something like that. Another thing to keep in mind is that Russia has a history of class and ethnic purging (Stalin's government killed way more people than Nazis). This is exactly the comment I am arguing against. Somehow Russia decades after Stalins death has a history of purging. Russia is exactly as much the Stalin regime as Germany is the third Reich or GB is the British empire and the US are still systemically racist, but they don't allow slavery anymore. Putins war crimes stand on their own feet, they do not need Stalin or the Russian empire to work. I think it is undeniable that Putins army uses terror against civilians as a tool and I hope they will pay for it. They are not nazis though. They do not plan to murder 43 million Ukrainians, they are arguing that Ukraine never existed because those people are actually really Russians. Their propaganda is desperately trying to keep up with the blatant lies of their leadership while reality might bring a defeat and not a 5 day victory. All of that does not justify or apologize for the crimes the invading army has committed but at the same time making Putin to Stalin 2.0 is not helpful either. This is prime westsplaining. You take a random misunderstood part of the argument (RU22=Stalin), strawman that, and then provide your own definitive explanation of what's happening "Russia just wants to destroy Ukraine". The only problem being, it's divorced from historical and current reality. You can trace the behaviour of modern Russia to the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars. Their people, their leaders, and especially their diplomatic corps learned a modus operandi and follow it to this day. Of course, there are modifications, improvements, and more, but Russia 2022 didn't fall out fo the sky, it evolved into its current state. And when a country has Stalin in its history, and instead of repenting like DE or JP, it has spent the last two decades glorifying him, you can see why mentioning Stalin is relevant. What Stalin did is not abhorrent to Russians, it's to be valued and replicated. Putin sees, and his successor will see, Russia as an empire. They appear to believe that they have been given a holy mission to make as much of the world Russian as possible. Whether that stops before they kill millions of Ukrainians or not, we don't know. But there is nothing in their rhetoric that says that they won't if they have to. And, their plan requires people from other nations to die as well. Moldovans, Georgians, perhaps the Finnish. Germany is almost certainly high on their list because of the part it played in WWII and the Cold War. They're salivating at the chance to declare Germany a nazi state and march on Berlin like in their Great Patriotic War. Fortunately, by showing the atrocities of Russia, and the genocidal intent behind them, we can hopefully rally to stop them, again. And, this time, we hopefully don't give them a "get out of jail free card" because they have oil and gas, and instead force them to play by the same rules as all other countries. You either behave or you get isolated. I disagree. And how is that "westsplaining", i am from eastern germany old enough to remember the GDR, i am as much part of the west as an average young person from Estonia is. You are talking about how Russia is so much defined by the opposition to the west and imperialism against the west and then manage to define yourself as being offended by an opinion held by a random person on the internet that happens to live in Germany. If Russia is the only country where you believe that their current behaviour is entirely in line with every bad thing they did in the last 200 years, while everyone else evolved from their imperialistic times and is now freed from their history, maybe you should think about why this one nation is so differently perceived by you. Russia is not a nazi state and had they won their war in 5 days, they would not have started to murder civilians. Because their goal was not to murder all Ukrainians, their goal was to puppet the country and generate as much wealth as possible for them to steal while looking like they care for this Russian Empire you seem to be fixated about. They are clearly willing to use terror as a tool, as such, the russian army right now and for the last 2 decades are definately war criminals and monsters. That does not mean them commiting war crimes is inevitable because they are russian, or that the next step can only be genocide of Ukraine or an invasion of germany. I'm not so sure this is an accurate sentiment. They detained, tortured, and disappeared plenty of Crimean civilians post-annexation. Unless you are not counting targeted eradication of anyone expressing anti-Russian sentiment as murdering civilians. I guess it wouldn't be uniformed soldiers doing it, though. There is also the difference that Crimea has the largest Russian population in Ukraine at ~70%, so if you want to kill non-Russians Crimea is not the region to commit mass murder in.
I'd say replace anti-Russian by anti- Russian government. There is a number of ethnic Ukrainians in Russian army and vice versa. Eastern regions of Ukraine are also mostly populated by ethnic Russians
|
Zelensky straight up refused to see the German president.
German president Steinmeier's visit to Kyiv 'not wanted'
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who's currently in Warsaw, said a trip to Ukraine suggested by his Polish counterpart "wasn't wanted" by Kyiv. He has been criticized for his closeness to Russia. Kyiv rejected the proposed trip by German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, he said on Tuesday while visiting Warsaw. Steinmeier had been planning to make a joint visit to Ukraine with Polish President Andrzej Duda and their Estonian, Lithuanian and Latvian counterparts "a strong signal of joint European solidarity with Ukraine." But "that apparently wasn't wanted in Kyiv" Steinmeier said. Ukraine has previously been highly critical of the German president over his connections with Russia and the leading role he played as former foreign minister in improving relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. https://m.dw.com/en/german-president-steinmeiers-visit-to-kyiv-not-wanted/a-61447160
Not sure it's a good time to act like that. People tend to be more willing to give you their money when you're nice to them.
|
On April 13 2022 01:54 Sent. wrote:Zelensky straight up refused to see the German president. Show nested quote +German president Steinmeier's visit to Kyiv 'not wanted'
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who's currently in Warsaw, said a trip to Ukraine suggested by his Polish counterpart "wasn't wanted" by Kyiv. He has been criticized for his closeness to Russia. Kyiv rejected the proposed trip by German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, he said on Tuesday while visiting Warsaw. Steinmeier had been planning to make a joint visit to Ukraine with Polish President Andrzej Duda and their Estonian, Lithuanian and Latvian counterparts "a strong signal of joint European solidarity with Ukraine." But "that apparently wasn't wanted in Kyiv" Steinmeier said. Ukraine has previously been highly critical of the German president over his connections with Russia and the leading role he played as former foreign minister in improving relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. https://m.dw.com/en/german-president-steinmeiers-visit-to-kyiv-not-wanted/a-61447160 Not sure it's a good time to act like that. People tend to be more willing to give you their money when you're nice to them.
I think its good. While a lot of the ukrainian criticism towards germany has felt a bit harsh and unfair, it did believe it helped in swaying public opinion. Politicians had to do something to save face, even if ukrainian demands where impossible to fulfil. Like with ukraine calling for a no fly zone, surely they knew it would be impossible since it would mean war with russia, but it might have helped getting other things to make up for it.
Our increased military spending is already getting back-pedalled in part, so a bit of heat seems needed.
|
On April 13 2022 01:59 Artesimo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 13 2022 01:54 Sent. wrote:Zelensky straight up refused to see the German president. German president Steinmeier's visit to Kyiv 'not wanted'
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who's currently in Warsaw, said a trip to Ukraine suggested by his Polish counterpart "wasn't wanted" by Kyiv. He has been criticized for his closeness to Russia. Kyiv rejected the proposed trip by German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, he said on Tuesday while visiting Warsaw. Steinmeier had been planning to make a joint visit to Ukraine with Polish President Andrzej Duda and their Estonian, Lithuanian and Latvian counterparts "a strong signal of joint European solidarity with Ukraine." But "that apparently wasn't wanted in Kyiv" Steinmeier said. Ukraine has previously been highly critical of the German president over his connections with Russia and the leading role he played as former foreign minister in improving relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. https://m.dw.com/en/german-president-steinmeiers-visit-to-kyiv-not-wanted/a-61447160 Not sure it's a good time to act like that. People tend to be more willing to give you their money when you're nice to them. I think its good. While a lot of the ukrainian criticism towards germany has felt a bit harsh and unfair, it did believe it helped in swaying public opinion. Politicians had to do something to save face, even if ukrainian demands where impossible to fulfil. Like with ukraine calling for a no fly zone, surely they knew it would be impossible since it would mean war with russia, but it might have helped getting other things to make up for it. Our increased military spending is already getting back-pedalled in part, so a bit of heat seems needed.
I don't think this will create any goodwill or sympathy though. It is one thing to have your ambassador run from talk show to talk show and demand the delivery of German submarines, so maybe Berlin gets their heads out of their asses and at least delivers something more than a few helmets. It is a completely different thing to pointlessly agitate the head of state, who is probably the most liked president for the past decades and a former party member of the current ruling party. What is there to gain?
|
US State department can't confirm that Russia is moving heavy military equipment to the Finnish border.
|
Russia attacking Finland is not a credible threat. Aside from not being able to fight Ukraine, let alone a war on 2 fronts they would also risk the EU directly getting involved as Finland is part of the EU mutual defence treaty, And if the EU gets involved NATO is a small step away.
|
On April 13 2022 04:02 Gorsameth wrote: Russia attacking Finland is not a credible threat. Aside from not being able to fight Ukraine, let alone a war on 2 fronts they would also risk the EU directly getting involved as Finland is part of the EU mutual defence treaty, And if the EU gets involved NATO is a small step away.
I don't think there's any chance of Russia attacking Finland, but the EU mutual defence treaty has nothing to do with it. If NATO involvement is a step away from EU involvement (and the EU doesn't want NATO involvement because of the risk of nuclear war), then Russia can expect the EU to sit on their hands and ignore whatever the piece of paper in front of them says.
NATO, on the other hand, has soldiers from multiple countries on the front line to tie everyone's hands together, so to speak.
|
On April 12 2022 05:28 Ghanburighan wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2022 04:06 Dangermousecatdog wrote: If that was true, then all countries in East Europe would just be dumping their old vehicles so they can order foreign equipment quicker. All countries in the world that buy foreign military eqiupment would be doing so too. That though, is not what is occuring. Could it be their governments are all less clever that Czechia who have solely figured this out?
Ordering a new tank is nothing like ordering a newly released car/graphics card/phone. You don't get on a waiting list. Military procurement is a country to country agreement and dumping your old vehicles does not get you to the "order book" any faster than if you did not. It's safe to say that Czechia is fine with making themselves have a weaker military in order to boost the capability of Ukraine and diminish the capability of Russia. That seems to very much be the ulterior motive here. No need for conspirical, aren't Czechs clever, theories. You misunderstood the logic. You clear your books in the sense that you create space in your own budget. Then you can use that budget space for a new order. And you need to be quick about placing orders, because a lot of countries are currently negotiating or starting to negotiate new orders. For countries like Estonia which are more nimble and don't generally use heavy machinery, it was much quicker and they have already placed orders in the size of about 0.2% GDP. For larger countries, I would be very surprised if they have even properly initiated the process yet. Edit: I'd like to emphasize that I don't know whether this is why CZ did this. That's speculation on my part. I'd be perfectly happy in the knowledge that they just want to help UA defeat RU. P.S. Any comparison to Hitler always derails a discussion. That, and the very real historical suffering of people is why it's better to leave these comparisons to historians and focus on the atrocities at hand. That's not how creating a space in a budget works. Losing military equipment for nothing and having to buy new eqiupment is the opposite of creating space in their budget. The Czech Republic military will have to spend more to maintain parity than if they did not give awy their equipment for free, no matter how old they are if they are still maintanable, which they are. As written before, military equipment are government to government deals. The motive is simple and obvious; Czech Republic wishes to support Ukraine. There's no need for a speculation of an ulterior motive that is doesn't stand up to logical scrutiny..
On April 13 2022 00:24 Manit0u wrote: You also have to consider the fact that if you for example make a YouTube video where you're saying anything not in line with Russian government statements or anything against or criticizing the "special operation" you're facing 15 years in prison. That is a pretty clear indication of a fascist regime.
And before people start calling me out for pointing out that Russia is in fact a fascist state, let's just check the quick checklist of 14 defining characteristics of fascism:
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - check 2. Disregard for Human Rights - check 3. Identification of Enemies as a Unifying Cause - check 4. Supremacy of the Military - maybe? 5. Widespread Sexism - check 6. Controlled Mass Media - check 7. Obsession with National Security - check 8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - maybe? 9. Corporate Power is Protected - check (oligarchs in this case) 10. Labor Power is Suppressed - check 11. Disrespect for Intellectuals and the Arts - maybe? 12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - check 13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - check 14. Fraudulent Elections - check
That's a lot of ticked boxes right there. Pretty clear indicators of a totalitarian fascist state in my opinion. It is enough to say Russia is a fascist state on that it is very much acting out on ethnic nationalistic idealogy, to conquer and suppress other nations, a nation whose prime focus is to glorify that ethnic nationalism at the expense of any other idealogy. That is afterall fascism. That is enough, without additional checkboxes. it shouldn't be controversal to say Russia today is a fascist state.
_________________________________________
That said, I don't equate Russia with Nazism, no matter how rife Nazis may be within the Russian military. Nazi Germany was a fascist state, but not all fascist state are Nazi. Russia can be their own brand of repugnance and horror, without having be party to the sentiments of Nazism. I can note with irony of Russia's propaganda of accusing Ukraine of being invaded to be "saved" from the influence of Nazism. However I must note with irony that painting Russia as Nazis, is exactly what Russia is attempting to do; to evoke an emotional word that does not describe.
_____________________________________________
You can be sure too, that Finland likewise is moving military assets. Difference is Finland isn't currently fighting a war thousand of miles away that it is supposed to be focusing attention on.
|
Is anyone actually claiming Russia is a Nazi state, though?
|
On April 13 2022 02:28 mahrgell wrote:Show nested quote +On April 13 2022 01:59 Artesimo wrote: I think its good. While a lot of the ukrainian criticism towards germany has felt a bit harsh and unfair, it did believe it helped in swaying public opinion. Politicians had to do something to save face, even if ukrainian demands where impossible to fulfil. Like with ukraine calling for a no fly zone, surely they knew it would be impossible since it would mean war with russia, but it might have helped getting other things to make up for it.
Our increased military spending is already getting back-pedalled in part, so a bit of heat seems needed. I don't think this will create any goodwill or sympathy though. It is one thing to have your ambassador run from talk show to talk show and demand the delivery of German submarines, so maybe Berlin gets their heads out of their asses and at least delivers something more than a few helmets. It is a completely different thing to pointlessly agitate the head of state, who is probably the most liked president for the past decades and a former party member of the current ruling party. What is there to gain?
Public pressure. Openly displaying that ukraine is dissatisfied with our behaviour can help with that. They are emphasizing their opinions on germany buying a lot of gas from russia for one, and I think it is supposed to target the conscience of the german public. By now we have openly accepted that it was a bad idea to be so dependent on russia, some people want to make amends for that and this is a message that what has been done so far is not enough.
I do see your point though, there is the risk of just seeing this as agitation, both from the german government as well as the public, and it could backfire. If I recall correctly, we did have one of our diplomats of foreign relations people voice frustration about the ukrainian ambassador to germany earlier in the war, though he did in the end admit that it was very much understandable and exactly what the ambassador was supposed to do.
Maybe its also more about internal politics though. If the ukrainian public is mad at us I can totally understand that, they just survived the first round of the fight for the survival of their nation. Now that a lot of leaders can't get to kiev fast enough to demonstrate how much they are on their side, I can see ukraine / the ukrainian public not granting germany the same little PR stunt.
Personally I like it for the potential of reinforcing the desire to support ukraine, and/or driving home the point that we do have to address our reliance on russian ressources. I would really hate it if the war ends and 2 or 3 years down the line we scrap all the plans and go back to depending heavily on russia.
|
|
|
|