|
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. |
On June 25 2023 05:54 zeo wrote: All of this, of course, went on with the backdrop of the disastrous failed offensive of the Ukrainian army Its better to not use a crack pipe as your source.
|
If they were shooting down this many aircraft then they were taking serious losses in the airstrikes. Chances are they couldn't reach Moscow even remotely capable of fighting.
|
Are there any updates on what Ukraine is doing in the meantime? It seems the decision to wait and see what happened was a good one because this insurrection seems to have petered out very quickly
|
Russian Federation605 Posts
|
I think at the end of the day this was just Prigozhin and Wagner "negotiating" for better conditions for their integration into the official military or whatever their future brings. Putin will not fully recover from this, he looks so weak. If you protest the war you get thrown into jail. If you occupy Rostov, take over some military bases and march towards the capitol, you get a free vacation in Belarus and a pardon?
|
And a free defenestration.
|
On June 25 2023 06:45 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2023 06:09 Broetchenholer wrote:On June 25 2023 05:54 zeo wrote: Well this was an interesting day.
The audacity of the whole spectacle. All of this, of course, went on with the backdrop of the disastrous failed offensive of the Ukrainian army, obviously Prigozhin went ahead with this at a time when there was no chance of a failure at the front but I doubt we will find out why any time soon (I'm going to be very interested when the memoirs' start coming out about 24.06.2023. in a decade or so)
So what was the point of all of this? What's the end game here? Wagner was part of one of the greatest combined arms victories in modern military history. They played a key role in destroying very large quantities of Ukrainian men and armor and delayed the Ukrainian offensive by months, giving the Russian military time to get its shit together. And we've seen the results in the last few weeks. Basically gold status in Russian society and then they go and do this... Because they were going to be integrated more into the RAF?
Why? Why degrade yourself to the point where you get the 'moderate rebel' tag from the western MSM. Everyone looks like an idiot. The Russian government especially, it didn't finish without bloodshed and its insane to think a nuclear power has this happening on its front lawn. Blowing up your own bridges to slow down your mercenary army? What? NATO look like tools because they are losing to these idiots. Not to mention the cringe amounts of fake news stuffing going on throughout the day, this thread being full of it. Its embarrassing to read (yes its funny sometimes to watch the peremoga-zrada cycle but the kind of trash people unironically posted today goes beyond, almost satire)
edit: CIPSO working long hours for nothing, ya hate to see it You are the only one that can look at this and somehow drag NATO into it. Also, the greatest combined arms victories in modern military history? What? Are you smoking? Literally every other phase of the war so far has been a bigger combined arms victory for one of the two sides so far... The battle for Bahmut in sheer numbers exceeded anything we've seen since the Korean War. Maybe the Siege of Basra? Aleppo for all brutality had less troops deployed and the Jihadi's never had air support. Again, looking at combined arms Bahmut/Artemovsk will always be near the top
What do you think this is, a tournament live report?
|
Zurich15313 Posts
Defenestration is for people still within the system. Can't really window a warlord that is roaming the country side with a private army.
This... Deal, whatever you want to call it, feels so unstable. And unstable in that there are so many new uncertainties and variables introduced that's it's unclear where all the instabilities and fault lines are. I don't envy any intelligence service right now.
|
Is there any way Ukraine could make use of Prigozhin's admission that Putin's casus belli was utter bullshit?
|
If Prigozhin stays alive, it's either because Putin wants him to stay alive, or because he sees too many downsides to chasing him down and killing him. If the latter is true we probably don't have to be worried about anything Prigozhin does in the future. But if it's the former, then Putin may still have plans for him.
It'll be important to monitor the movement of Wagner troops near Ukraine under Prigozhin's immediate command.
|
On June 25 2023 18:02 Godwrath wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2023 06:45 zeo wrote:On June 25 2023 06:09 Broetchenholer wrote:On June 25 2023 05:54 zeo wrote: Well this was an interesting day.
The audacity of the whole spectacle. All of this, of course, went on with the backdrop of the disastrous failed offensive of the Ukrainian army, obviously Prigozhin went ahead with this at a time when there was no chance of a failure at the front but I doubt we will find out why any time soon (I'm going to be very interested when the memoirs' start coming out about 24.06.2023. in a decade or so)
So what was the point of all of this? What's the end game here? Wagner was part of one of the greatest combined arms victories in modern military history. They played a key role in destroying very large quantities of Ukrainian men and armor and delayed the Ukrainian offensive by months, giving the Russian military time to get its shit together. And we've seen the results in the last few weeks. Basically gold status in Russian society and then they go and do this... Because they were going to be integrated more into the RAF?
Why? Why degrade yourself to the point where you get the 'moderate rebel' tag from the western MSM. Everyone looks like an idiot. The Russian government especially, it didn't finish without bloodshed and its insane to think a nuclear power has this happening on its front lawn. Blowing up your own bridges to slow down your mercenary army? What? NATO look like tools because they are losing to these idiots. Not to mention the cringe amounts of fake news stuffing going on throughout the day, this thread being full of it. Its embarrassing to read (yes its funny sometimes to watch the peremoga-zrada cycle but the kind of trash people unironically posted today goes beyond, almost satire)
edit: CIPSO working long hours for nothing, ya hate to see it You are the only one that can look at this and somehow drag NATO into it. Also, the greatest combined arms victories in modern military history? What? Are you smoking? Literally every other phase of the war so far has been a bigger combined arms victory for one of the two sides so far... The battle for Bahmut in sheer numbers exceeded anything we've seen since the Korean War. Maybe the Siege of Basra? Aleppo for all brutality had less troops deployed and the Jihadi's never had air support. Again, looking at combined arms Bahmut/Artemovsk will always be near the top What do you think this is, a tournament live report? Maybe you should go through some of the hot takes posted here yesterday with your tournament live report comment in mind. From around page 469 onward compiling a list of every fake and lie posted here along with an explanation would take a very long time. Still interesting to read through and see the cope narrative warp in real time though with this much stuffing you can debunk one lie, and there is another 99 people are clinging onto. There's that saying: The longer you deny reality, the harder it will hit you in the face later. And a lot of people here are going to be feeling sore by the time its all over, or they'll just cling onto the next fad that comes along and forget everything about it.
On another note I honestly should have been more specific about the Bahmut comment, I was referring to specific battles between peer armies, not military whole campaigns. And that is totally my bad. Still we are only now seeing just how important Bahmut really was and the consequences of the way the government in Kiev defended it.
The inability of the Ukrainian army to consolidate even minor strategic gains with the resources put forth in June is very telling of where this conflict is going. We went from Crimea in three days to maybe Crimea in there months, to we will just stop talking about it all together, shifting goalposts doesn't win wars. Unless the UAF really goes collapse in on itself with losses during the offensive Russia does not have the manpower at the front without another wave of mobilization to end the conflict.
For a political settlement, with Zelensky ruling out any kind of elections we might have to wait until the US presidential one to see which way the wind will blow. Thats still a long way away though and all it takes is a crazy day like yesterday to throw everything upside down. I mean, Wagner was 200km away from Moscow yesterday, today they are in Belarus 150km away from Kiev .
|
On June 25 2023 19:48 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2023 18:02 Godwrath wrote:On June 25 2023 06:45 zeo wrote:On June 25 2023 06:09 Broetchenholer wrote:On June 25 2023 05:54 zeo wrote: Well this was an interesting day.
The audacity of the whole spectacle. All of this, of course, went on with the backdrop of the disastrous failed offensive of the Ukrainian army, obviously Prigozhin went ahead with this at a time when there was no chance of a failure at the front but I doubt we will find out why any time soon (I'm going to be very interested when the memoirs' start coming out about 24.06.2023. in a decade or so)
So what was the point of all of this? What's the end game here? Wagner was part of one of the greatest combined arms victories in modern military history. They played a key role in destroying very large quantities of Ukrainian men and armor and delayed the Ukrainian offensive by months, giving the Russian military time to get its shit together. And we've seen the results in the last few weeks. Basically gold status in Russian society and then they go and do this... Because they were going to be integrated more into the RAF?
Why? Why degrade yourself to the point where you get the 'moderate rebel' tag from the western MSM. Everyone looks like an idiot. The Russian government especially, it didn't finish without bloodshed and its insane to think a nuclear power has this happening on its front lawn. Blowing up your own bridges to slow down your mercenary army? What? NATO look like tools because they are losing to these idiots. Not to mention the cringe amounts of fake news stuffing going on throughout the day, this thread being full of it. Its embarrassing to read (yes its funny sometimes to watch the peremoga-zrada cycle but the kind of trash people unironically posted today goes beyond, almost satire)
edit: CIPSO working long hours for nothing, ya hate to see it You are the only one that can look at this and somehow drag NATO into it. Also, the greatest combined arms victories in modern military history? What? Are you smoking? Literally every other phase of the war so far has been a bigger combined arms victory for one of the two sides so far... The battle for Bahmut in sheer numbers exceeded anything we've seen since the Korean War. Maybe the Siege of Basra? Aleppo for all brutality had less troops deployed and the Jihadi's never had air support. Again, looking at combined arms Bahmut/Artemovsk will always be near the top What do you think this is, a tournament live report? Maybe you should go through some of the hot takes posted here yesterday with your tournament live report comment in mind. From around page 469 onward compiling a list of every fake and lie posted here along with an explanation would take a very long time.
May I ask for you to single out just one lie that stuck out to you? Just one shouldn't be too much to ask.
|
I wonder if this mutiny/coup could embolden Free Russia/RVC to venture deeper into Russia and destroy all sorts of assets in the rear. The Kremlin really struggled to put up a fight. They showed just how vulnerable they are.
|
Meanwhile back in Ukraine.... NSFW.
|
Bakhmut is only exceptional post ww2 because of how long it took to clear the city. It didn't even end the battle as Ukraine has just swept right back into the city and is making gains again. The Kharkiv offensive was still more decisive and important on the war as a whole Ukraine just managed to do it in a lot less time. If you're talking peer to peer battles you are ignoreing all the asian wars like the post ww2 chinese civil war battles and again iran-iraq. Its not an impressive combined arms battle when you're just grinding through urban combat
I don't know who told you the plan was a kyiv in three days three months don't talk about it anymore, oh wait I mean crimea but anyone who told you that was dumb. The only one shifting goalposts is Russians milblogers who don't understand whats going on. Ukraine has already taken far more than bakhmut. The idea that somehow kyiv is more vulnerable now than it was at the start of the war just shows a level of delusion. if the entire russian army was somehow able to teleport to belerus right now and attack kyiv I don't think it would have a chance at taking kyiv.
|
Russian Federation240 Posts
On June 25 2023 22:13 Sermokala wrote: Bakhmut is only exceptional post ww2 because of how long it took to clear the city. It didn't even end the battle as Ukraine has just swept right back into the city and is making gains again. The Kharkiv offensive was still more decisive and important on the war as a whole Ukraine just managed to do it in a lot less time. If you're talking peer to peer battles you are ignoreing all the asian wars like the post ww2 chinese civil war battles and again iran-iraq. Its not an impressive combined arms battle when you're just grinding through urban combat
I don't know who told you the plan was a kyiv in three days three months don't talk about it anymore, oh wait I mean crimea but anyone who told you that was dumb. The only one shifting goalposts is Russians milblogers who don't understand whats going on. Ukraine has already taken far more than bakhmut. The idea that somehow kyiv is more vulnerable now than it was at the start of the war just shows a level of delusion. if the entire russian army was somehow able to teleport to belerus right now and attack kyiv I don't think it would have a chance at taking kyiv.
I agree with you that Petraeus is a bit dimwit. https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jun/03/russia-ukraine-war-live-russian-army-may-struggle-in-bakhmut-compared-with-wagner-uk-mod-suggests?page=with:block-647afd7a8f08b007454b97f0#block-647afd7a8f08b007454b97f0
|
On June 25 2023 22:20 a_ch wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2023 22:13 Sermokala wrote: Bakhmut is only exceptional post ww2 because of how long it took to clear the city. It didn't even end the battle as Ukraine has just swept right back into the city and is making gains again. The Kharkiv offensive was still more decisive and important on the war as a whole Ukraine just managed to do it in a lot less time. If you're talking peer to peer battles you are ignoreing all the asian wars like the post ww2 chinese civil war battles and again iran-iraq. Its not an impressive combined arms battle when you're just grinding through urban combat
I don't know who told you the plan was a kyiv in three days three months don't talk about it anymore, oh wait I mean crimea but anyone who told you that was dumb. The only one shifting goalposts is Russians milblogers who don't understand whats going on. Ukraine has already taken far more than bakhmut. The idea that somehow kyiv is more vulnerable now than it was at the start of the war just shows a level of delusion. if the entire russian army was somehow able to teleport to belerus right now and attack kyiv I don't think it would have a chance at taking kyiv. I agree with you that Petraeus is a bit dimwit. https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jun/03/russia-ukraine-war-live-russian-army-may-struggle-in-bakhmut-compared-with-wagner-uk-mod-suggests?page=with:block-647afd7a8f08b007454b97f0#block-647afd7a8f08b007454b97f0 What do you think that interview says?
|
So much for the narrative that the whole thing was just a big ruse. If Russia wanted to do some 4D false flag move to somehow embarass NATO (or whatever this dumb conspiracy theory that's floating around on twitter) then why would they intentionally allow Wagner to kill 15 airmen and destroy multiple expensive pieces of airpower? Must have been pretty committed to the illusion right?
This deal still has me confused. It doesn't make a lot of sense from either side. If Putin is seriously going to just let Pirghozin walk free and keep his money/influence abroad then doesn't that make him look exceptionally weak? The dude panicked and flew out of Moscow when the convoy was on its way, then caved and paid the guy off after making a big public address about he was a traitor and all of Wagner were traitors on Russian TV. Even if he kills him off now and does the usual thing of trying to have plausible deniabilty for it, doesn't that still make him look like he caved in to something he insists was a minor situation he had under control.
And from Pirghozin's point of view, he can't seriously trust that Putin will actually leave him alone now can he? Maybe he felt like he liked his chances better dodging Putin's assassins and Russian Mafia hits than dying in combat in Moscow because he didn't have enough support from the Russian Military. But if his march on Moscow was that easily called off, why even make the push in the first place if he wasn't committed to it?
Whole thing is so strange. I just hope Ukraine took advantage of it the day of confusion as best that they could.
|
United States42014 Posts
On June 25 2023 22:20 a_ch wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2023 22:13 Sermokala wrote: Bakhmut is only exceptional post ww2 because of how long it took to clear the city. It didn't even end the battle as Ukraine has just swept right back into the city and is making gains again. The Kharkiv offensive was still more decisive and important on the war as a whole Ukraine just managed to do it in a lot less time. If you're talking peer to peer battles you are ignoreing all the asian wars like the post ww2 chinese civil war battles and again iran-iraq. Its not an impressive combined arms battle when you're just grinding through urban combat
I don't know who told you the plan was a kyiv in three days three months don't talk about it anymore, oh wait I mean crimea but anyone who told you that was dumb. The only one shifting goalposts is Russians milblogers who don't understand whats going on. Ukraine has already taken far more than bakhmut. The idea that somehow kyiv is more vulnerable now than it was at the start of the war just shows a level of delusion. if the entire russian army was somehow able to teleport to belerus right now and attack kyiv I don't think it would have a chance at taking kyiv. I agree with you that Petraeus is a bit dimwit. https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jun/03/russia-ukraine-war-live-russian-army-may-struggle-in-bakhmut-compared-with-wagner-uk-mod-suggests?page=with:block-647afd7a8f08b007454b97f0#block-647afd7a8f08b007454b97f0 I don’t think that says what you think it says. He’s describing rotating 72-96 hour phases of pushing, entrenching, consolidating to move through a minefield. He’s not saying that the war would be won in 72 hours.
|
Mexico2170 Posts
There is one thing that is clear. We’re being lied to. We don’t know what actually happened.
As much as we’d want it to be true, they are not stupid. If this situation doesn’t make sense, and the deal doesn’t make sense, it’s because we’re missing a lot of information. They wouldn’t have made a deal so fast if it didn’t make sense for both parties.
Just keep that in mind.
|
|
|
|